1
|
Uppal V, Russell R, Sondekoppam RV, Ansari J, Baber Z, Chen Y, DelPizzo K, Dirzu DS, Kalagara H, Kissoon NR, Kranz PG, Leffert L, Lim G, Lobo C, Lucas DN, Moka E, Rodriguez SE, Sehmbi H, Vallejo MC, Volk T, Narouze S. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on postdural puncture headache: a consensus report from a multisociety international working group. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024; 49:471-501. [PMID: 37582578 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis or management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. This multisociety guidance aims to fill this void and provide practitioners with comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with PDPH. METHODS Based on input from committee members and stakeholders, the committee cochairs developed 10 review questions deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid) on 2 March 2022. The results from each search were imported into separate Covidence projects for deduplication and screening, followed by data extraction. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for the development of guidelines and shared with contributors. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations graded according to the US Preventative Services Task Force grading of evidence. The interim draft was shared electronically, with each collaborator requested to vote anonymously on each recommendation using two rounds of a modified Delphi approach. RESULTS Based on contemporary evidence and consensus, the multidisciplinary panel generated 50 recommendations to provide guidance regarding risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH, along with their strength and certainty of evidence. After two rounds of voting, we achieved a high level of consensus for all statements and recommendations. Several recommendations had moderate-to-low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS These clinical practice guidelines for PDPH provide a framework to improve identification, evaluation and delivery of evidence-based care by physicians performing neuraxial procedures to improve the quality of care and align with patients' interests. Uncertainty remains regarding best practice for the majority of management approaches for PDPH due to the paucity of evidence. Additionally, opportunities for future research are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Uppal
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management & Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Robin Russell
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rakesh V Sondekoppam
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jessica Ansari
- Anesthesia Department, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Zafeer Baber
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yian Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kathryn DelPizzo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dan Sebastian Dirzu
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Hari Kalagara
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Narayan R Kissoon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Peter G Kranz
- Depatement of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa Leffert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale New Haven Health System; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Grace Lim
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Clara Lobo
- Anesthesiology Institute, Interventional Pain Medicine Department, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Dominique Nuala Lucas
- Department of Anaesthesia, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Eleni Moka
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Creta Interclinic Hospital - Hellenic Healthcare Group (HHG), Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Stephen E Rodriguez
- Department of Anesthesia, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Herman Sehmbi
- Department of Anesthesia, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manuel C Vallejo
- Departments of Medical Education, Anesthesiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Thomas Volk
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Saarland University Hospital and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany
| | - Samer Narouze
- Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA
- Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ledesma I, Stieger A, Luedi MM, Romero CS. Spinal anesthesia in ambulatory patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2024:00001503-990000000-00211. [PMID: 38979677 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW To assess current practice in the use of spinal anesthesia in major ambulatory surgery, highlighting its advantages over general anesthesia and identifying potential areas for improvement to facilitate a transition to a sustainable healthcare system. RECENT FINDINGS Spinal anesthesia might be preferred in selected populations when compared to general anesthesia providing the highest standards of healthcare quality.The use of local anesthetics with short half-life has proven to be efficient in achieving high anesthesia success rates. Spinal anesthesia does not increase perioperative complications; instead, it has shown a reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting, an improvement in patient comfort, and a favorable economic impact when compared to general anesthesia. SUMMARY Spinal anesthesia is an appropriate method for anesthesia in ambulatory patients, offering advantages over general anesthesia in selected populations.The use of spinal anesthesia is expanding to meet surgical needs. Therefore, it is crucial to plan ahead and anticipate organizational failures in the ambulatory setting to maintain safety and efficiency during outpatient procedures and surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Ledesma
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital General Universitario De Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Andrea Stieger
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Markus M Luedi
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carolina S Romero
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital General Universitario De Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Research Methods Department, Universidad Europea de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carley M, Sheetz M, Lauzadis J, Zhong H, DelPizzo K. Mepivacaine dosing for spinal anesthesia in pediatric orthopedic surgery: a retrospective chart review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024:rapm-2023-105093. [PMID: 38307613 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mepivacaine is an intermediate-acting local anesthetic used for spinal anesthesia in adults. Currently, there are no published dosing guidelines for spinal mepivacaine in patients under age 18. AIMS The purpose of this study is to describe the clinically used doses of mepivacaine by weight and age for orthopedic surgery in pediatrics. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of patients aged 0-18 who received mepivacaine for spinal anesthesia from 2016 to 2022. We performed a secondary analysis for patients aged 0-18 who received spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine or chloroprocaine. RESULTS The data extraction yielded 3627 single-shot mepivacaine spinals. Patient age ranged from 5 to 18 years. Median dosage in milligrams/kilograms (mg/kg) of mepivacaine was calculated for each age group. Our analysis revealed that dosage in mg/kg decreased by patient age and began to plateau at age 15. Bupivacaine was the most common single-shot spinal agent in patients under age 10. After age 10, mepivacaine was more common. Chloroprocaine began to be used in patients older than 8 years. CONCLUSIONS We describe mepivacaine dosage as a function of age and weight in patients younger than 18 years. As age and weight increased, a lower dose of mepivacaine per kg was administered for spinal anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Carley
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Miriam Sheetz
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Justas Lauzadis
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Haoyan Zhong
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kathryn DelPizzo
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Uppal V, Russell R, Sondekoppam R, Ansari J, Baber Z, Chen Y, DelPizzo K, Dîrzu DS, Kalagara H, Kissoon NR, Kranz PG, Leffert L, Lim G, Lobo CA, Lucas DN, Moka E, Rodriguez SE, Sehmbi H, Vallejo MC, Volk T, Narouze S. Consensus Practice Guidelines on Postdural Puncture Headache From a Multisociety, International Working Group: A Summary Report. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2325387. [PMID: 37581893 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures, such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. Objective To fill the practice guidelines void and provide comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations for preventing, diagnosing, and managing PDPH. Evidence Review With input from committee members and stakeholders of 6 participating professional societies, 10 review questions that were deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH were developed. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE on March 2, 2022. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews, and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for practice guideline development and shared with collaborator groups. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations that were rated according to the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence. Collaborators were asked to vote anonymously on each recommendation using 2 rounds of a modified Delphi approach. Findings After 2 rounds of electronic voting by a 21-member multidisciplinary collaborator team, 47 recommendations were generated to provide guidance on the risk factors for and the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH, along with ratings for the strength and certainty of evidence. A 90% to 100% consensus was obtained for almost all recommendations. Several recommendations were rated as having moderate to low certainty. Opportunities for future research were identified. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this consensus statement suggest that current approaches to the treatment and management of PDPH are not uniform due to the paucity of evidence. The practice guidelines, however, provide a framework for individual clinicians to assess PDPH risk, confirm the diagnosis, and adopt a systematic approach to its management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Uppal
- Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Robin Russell
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Oxford, England
| | - Rakesh Sondekoppam
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City
| | - Jessica Ansari
- Anesthesia Department, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California
| | - Zafeer Baber
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yian Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Kathryn DelPizzo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Dan Sebastian Dîrzu
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Hari Kalagara
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Narayan R Kissoon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Peter G Kranz
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lisa Leffert
- Yale University School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital and Bridgeport Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Grace Lim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Magee Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Clara A Lobo
- Anesthesiology Institute, Interventional Pain Medicine Department, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Dominique Nuala Lucas
- Department of Anaesthesia, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England
| | - Eleni Moka
- Anaesthesiology Department, Creta Interclinic Hospital-Hellenic Healthcare Group, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Herman Sehmbi
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manuel C Vallejo
- Medical Education, Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | - Thomas Volk
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Samer Narouze
- Rootstown and Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schubert AK, Wiesmann T, Wulf H, Dinges HC. Spinal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2023; 37:109-121. [PMID: 37321760 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Spinal anesthesia is a safe alternative to general anesthesia but remains underrepresented in the ambulatory setting. Most concerns relate to low flexibility of spinal anesthesia duration and the management of urinary retention in the outpatient setting. This review focuses on the characterization and safety of the local anesthetics that are available to adapt spinal anesthesia very flexibly to the needs of ambulatory surgery. Furthermore, recent studies on the management of postoperative urinary retention provide evidence for safe, but report wider discharge criteria and much lower hospital admission rates. With the local anesthetics that have current approval for usage in spinal anesthesia, most requirements for ambulatory surgeries can be met. The reported evidence on local anesthetics without approval supports clinically established off-label use and can improve the results even further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Kristin Schubert
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiesmann
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Diakoneo Diak Klinikum Schwäbisch-Hall, Schwäbisch-Hall, Germany
| | - Hinnerk Wulf
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany.
| | - Hanns-Christian Dinges
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Siegler BH, Oehler B, Kranke P, Weigand MA. [Postdural puncture headache in obstetrics : Pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment]. DIE ANAESTHESIOLOGIE 2022; 71:646-660. [PMID: 35925200 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-022-01171-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most important complications of peripartum neuraxial analgesia. Loss of cerebrospinal fluid volume and pressure as well as compensatory intracranial vasodilation are assumed to be responsible. Potentially severe long-term sequelae necessitate the correct diagnosis of PDPH, exclusion of relevant differential diagnoses (with atypical symptoms and when indicated via imaging techniques) and rapid initiation of effective treatment. Nonopioid analgesics, caffeine and occasionally theophylline, gabapentin and hydrocortisone are the cornerstones of pharmacological treatment, while the timely placement of an autologous epidural blood patch (EBP) represents the gold standard procedure when symptoms persist despite the use of analgesics. Procedures using neural treatment are promising alternatives, especially when an EBP is not desired by the patient or is contraindicated. Interdisciplinary and interprofessional consensus standard procedures can contribute to optimization of the clinical management of this relevant complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Hermann Siegler
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - Beatrice Oehler
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Peter Kranke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Markus Alexander Weigand
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zetlaoui PJ, Buchheit T, Benhamou D. Epidural blood patch: A narrative review. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2022; 41:101138. [DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
8
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This manuscript aims to review the risks and the current treatments for postdural puncture headache (PDPH). RECENT FINDINGS PDPH is a relatively frequent complication after neuraxial blocks. It is typically orthostatic in nature, presenting as a positional and dull aching or throbbing headache, with added dysregulation of auditory and/or visual signals. Certain characteristics, such as female sex and young age, may predispose patients to the development of PDPH, as may factors such as previous PDPH, bearing down during the second stage of labor, and the neuraxial technique itself. Long-term complications including chronic headache for years following dural puncture have brought into question of the historical classification of PDPH as a self-limiting headache. So far, the underlying mechanism governing PDPH remains under investigation, while a wide variety of prophylactic and therapeutic measures have been explored with various degree of success. In case of mild PDPH, conservative management involving bed rest and pharmacological management should be used as first-line treatment. Nerve blocks are highly efficient alternatives for PDPH patients who do not respond well to conservative treatment. In case of moderate-to-severe PDPH, epidural blood patch remains the therapy of choice. An interdisciplinary approach to care for patients with PDPH is recommended to achieve optimal outcomes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang YJ, Hung KC, Chen IW, Kuo CL, Teng IC, Lin MC, Yew M, Liao SW, Wu CY, Yu CH, Lan KM, Sun CK. Efficacy of greater occipital nerve block for pain relief in patients with postdural puncture headache: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28438. [PMID: 34941197 PMCID: PMC8701447 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed at assessing the therapeutic effectiveness of greater occipital nerve block (GONB) against postdural puncture headache (PDPH). METHODS Studies investigating analgesic effects of GONB against PDPH in adults were retrieved from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google scholar, and Cochrane central databases from their inception dates to May, 2021. Pain score at postprocedural 24 hours was the primary endpoint, while secondary endpoints were pain score at postprocedural 1 hour and 12 hours as well as the risk of intervention failure. RESULTS Of the 7 studies (randomized controlled trials [RCTs], n = 4; non-RCTs, n = 3) that recruited 275 patients, 2 investigated female patients undergoing cesarean section and the other 5 were conducted in both obstetric and nonobstetric settings. Pooled results showed a lower mean pain score at 24 hours (i.e., primary outcome) (mean difference [MD] = -2.66, 95%: CI: -3.98 to -1.33, P < .001; I2 = 97%, 6 studies), 1 hour (MD = -4.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.08 to -3.37, P < .00001; I2 = 86%, 5 studies), and 6 hours (MD = -2.78, 95% CI: -4.99 to -0.57, P = .01; I2 = 98%, 4 studies) in patients with GONB compared to those without. Trial sequential analysis supported the robustness of evidence at postprocedural 24 hours. The use of GONB also decreased the risk of intervention failure (relative ratio [RR] = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.82, P = .01; I2 = 96%, 6 studies, 277 patients). CONCLUSION Our results suggested a therapeutic effect of greater occipital nerve block against postdural puncture headache up to postprocedural 24 hours. Further large-scale studies are warranted to evaluate its therapeutic benefit beyond the acute stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Jen Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
- Department of Recreation and Health-Care Management, College of Recreation and Health Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Chuan Hung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - I-Wen Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Lin Kuo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - I-Chia Teng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chung Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Ming Yew
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Wei Liao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Yi Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hung Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Mao Lan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Cheuk-Kwan Sun
- Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine for International Students, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Ling Lee
- Department of Medicine, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Nursing, Oriental Institute of Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Wen-Hsun Chang
- Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Peng-Hui Wang
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Female Cancer Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Barad M, Carroll I, Reina MA, Ansari J, Flood P. Did she have an epidural? The long-term consequences of postdural puncture headache and the role of unintended dural puncture. Headache 2021; 61:1314-1323. [PMID: 34570902 DOI: 10.1111/head.14221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This narrative literature review examines the long-term impact of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in postpartum women following an unintended dural puncture (UDP) with a large bore needle commonly used for epidural catheter placement. It seeks to bridge the knowledge gap for the neurologist as to the mounting body of obstetric anesthesia literature on the development of chronic headache after PDPH with this unique needle. BACKGROUND Headache is the most common complication of dural puncture, and the risk is greatest in the parturient population. Preexisting risk factors for this population include youth and sex, and after UDP with a large bore needle, almost 70%-80% report a headache. Additionally, there appears to be a significant cohort who experience long-term, persistent headache after UDP. METHODS We performed a narrative review of literature using PubMed, searching terms that included long-term follow-up after UDP with a large bore needle in the postpartum population. RESULTS In women who had UDP with a large bore needle used for epidural catheter placement at delivery, the rate of chronic debilitating headache is around 30% in the months following delivery and may persist for up to a year or longer. CONCLUSION Based on the existing literature, we have mounting evidence that UDP with the large bore needle used to place an epidural catheter should be understood as a high-risk inciting event for the development of long-term headaches not simply a high risk of acute PDPH. Additionally, consideration should be given to stratifying the etiology of PDPH, based on needle type, and recognizing the entity of chronic PDPH, thus allowing for improvements in research and diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith Barad
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ian Carroll
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Miguel A Reina
- CEU San Pablo University School of Medicine, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Anesthesiology, Madrid-Montepríncipe University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jessica Ansari
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Pamela Flood
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Morgan KJ, Mohan R, Karol SE, Flerlage J. Epidural blood patch for post-dural puncture headaches in adult and paediatric patients with malignancies: a review. Br J Anaesth 2021; 126:1200-1207. [PMID: 33612247 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.11.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Many anaesthetists are hesitant to perform epidural blood patch in patients with cancer because of the potential risk of seeding the CNS with malignant cells. Recent evidence suggests that anaesthetists may view malignancy as a relative contraindication to epidural blood patch rather than an absolute contraindication. This review article summarises the clinical dilemma, reviews the existing literature, and proposes a treatment algorithm that includes the utilisation of for the management of post-dural puncture headache in the oncology population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle J Morgan
- Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
| | - Rahul Mohan
- The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Seth E Karol
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jamie Flerlage
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery: current controversies and concerns. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2020; 33:746-752. [DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000000924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|