Perioperative Lung Protection: Clinical Implications

Individual FiO2 guided by SPO2 prevents hyperoxia and reduces postoperative atelectasis in colorectal surgery: A randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether individualized fraction of inspired oxygen (iFiO2) improves pulmonary atelectasis after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery relative to 60 % FiO2.

DESIGN

This was a single-center, prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

This study was conducted in a single tertiary care hospital in China.

PATIENTS

A total of 84 eligible inpatients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery between August 2021 and May 2022 were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were randomly assigned to receive either a fixed fraction of inspiration oxygen (fFiO2 group) or individualized FiO2 based on physiological SpO2 (iFiO2 group).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the lung ultrasound score (LUS) at 30 min after extubation. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, admission to the intensive care unit, the length of post-anesthetic care unit stay, the ratio of lung capacity on the third day after surgery compared with before surgery, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, and surgical site infections after surgery. Additionally, the airway plate pressure, airway peak pressure, pulmonary dynamic compliance, PaO2, oxygenation index, alveolar-arterial oxygen tension gradient (A-aDO2), and pulmonary shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) were considered.

MAIN RESULTS

The LUS was significantly lowered in the iFiO2 group (5 [4, 7]) compared with the fFiO2 group (8 [4, 10]) (P = 0.03). Based on the criterion for determining atelectasis, 25 patients (62.5 %) in the fFiO2 group experienced significant atelectasis compared with 15 patients (37.5 %) in the iFiO2 group (P = 0.025). At the end of surgery, PaO2, A-aDO2, and Qs/Qt were significantly reduced in patients in the iFiO2 group compared with those in the fFiO2 group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of iFiO2 during operation significantly reduces the LUS and pulmonary atelectasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery under general anesthesia.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTRT2100049615.

Effects of Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Solution Combined with Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on the Internal Environment of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized 2 × 2 Factorial Design Pilot

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the influence of sodium bicarbonate Ringer's solution (BRS) combined with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the internal environment in patients who have undergone laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A total of 128 patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery were randomly divided into the control group (group C), the PEEP group (group P), the BRS group (group B), and the BRS combined with the PEEP group (group BP). The results of arterial blood gas analysis, including pH value, base excess (BE), concentrations of electrolyte, and lactate (Lac) were documented before intravenous infusion (T0) and 5 min after the surgery (T1). Additional metrics included tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and were quantified before intravenous infusion and at 30 min post-surgery. The quality of recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15) scores were documented preoperatively (D0) and on the first (D1) and third (D3) days, postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was no significant interaction effect between the two factors of BRS and PEEP (p = 0.659). After the infusion of BRS, the pH level increased significantly at T2 (p < 0.05). Using PEEP during operation can increase PaO2 in patients with obesity (p < 0.05). The level of pH value is increased, and the concentrations of inflammatory factors are reduced due to the combination of BRS and PEEP (p < 0.05). Compared with group C, group BP exhibited an augmentation in QoR-15 (p < 0.05), and the recovery time of group BP was significantly shortened (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

BRS combined with PEEP has been demonstrated to improve acid-base balance, reduce the inflammatory response, shorten the recovery time, and substantially enhance the quality of early postoperative recovery.

Mechanical power during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) requires pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position. Our aim was to investigate the influence of the combination of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on mechanical power and its components during RALP.

METHODS

Sixty-one prospectively enrolled patients scheduled for RALP were studied in supine position before surgery, during pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery at constant ventilatory setting. In a subgroup of 17 patients the response to increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from 5 to 10 cmH2O was studied.

RESULTS

The application of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position increased the total mechanical power (13.8 [11.6 - 15.5] vs 9.2 [7.5 - 11.7] J/min, p < 0.001) and its elastic and resistive components compared to supine position before surgery. In supine position after surgery the total mechanical power and its elastic component decreased but remained higher compared to supine position before surgery. Increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 cmH2O within each timepoint significantly increased the total mechanical power (supine position before surgery: 9.8 [8.4 - 10.4] vs 12.1 [11.4 - 14.2] J/min, p < 0.001; pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position: 13.8 [12.2 - 14.3] vs 15.5 [15.0 - 16.7] J/min, p < 0.001; supine position after surgery: 10.2 [9.4 - 10.7] vs 12.7 [12.0 - 13.6] J/min, p < 0.001), without affecting respiratory system elastance.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical power in healthy patients undergoing RALP significantly increased both during the pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery. PEEP always increased mechanical power without ameliorating the respiratory system elastance.

Comparison of lung aeration loss in open abdominal oncologic surgeries after ventilation with electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP versus conventional PEEP: a pilot feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Existing literature lacks high-quality evidence regarding the ideal intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to minimize postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). We hypothesized that applying individualized PEEP derived from electrical impedance tomography would reduce the severity of postoperative lung aeration loss, deterioration in oxygenation, and PPC incidence.

METHODS

A pilot feasibility study was conducted on 36 patients who underwent open abdominal oncologic surgery. The patients were randomized to receive individualized PEEP or conventional PEEP at 4 cmH2O. The primary outcome was the impact of individualized PEEP on changes in the modified lung ultrasound score (MLUS) derived from preoperative and postoperative lung ultrasonography. A higher MLUS indicated greater lung aeration loss. The secondary outcomes were the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and PPC incidence.

RESULTS

A significant increase in the postoperative MLUS (12.0 ± 3.6 vs 7.9 ± 2.1, P < 0.001) and a significant difference between the postoperative and preoperative MLUS values (7.0 ± 3.3 vs 3.0 ± 1.6, P < 0.001) were found in the conventional PEEP group, indicating increased lung aeration loss. In the conventional PEEP group, the intraoperative PaO2/FiO2 ratios were significantly lower but not the postoperative ratios. The PPC incidence was not significantly different between the groups. Post-hoc analysis showed the increase in lung aeration loss and deterioration of intraoperative oxygenation correlated with the deviation from the individualized PEEP.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized PEEP appears to protect against lung aeration loss and intraoperative oxygenation deterioration. The advantage was greater in patients whose individualized PEEP deviated more from the conventional PEEP.

Effect of the alveolar recruitment maneuver during laparoscopic colorectal surgery on postoperative pulmonary complications: A randomized controlled trial

Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation, including low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure, reduces postoperative pulmonary complications. However, the effect and specific alveolar recruitment maneuver method are controversial. We investigated whether the intraoperative intermittent recruitment maneuver further reduced postoperative pulmonary complications while using a lung-protective ventilation strategy. Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery were randomly allocated to the recruitment or control groups. Intraoperative ventilation was adjusted to maintain a tidal volume of 6-8 mL kg-1 and positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O in both groups. The alveolar recruitment maneuver was applied at three time points (at the start and end of the pneumoperitoneum, and immediately before extubation) by maintaining a continuous pressure of 30 cmH2O for 30 s in the recruitment group. Clinical and radiological evidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was investigated within 7 days postoperatively. A total of 125 patients were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was not significantly different between the recruitment and control groups (28.1% vs. 31.1%, P = 0.711), while the mean ± standard deviation intraoperative peak inspiratory pressure was significantly lower in the recruitment group (10.7 ± 3.2 vs. 13.5 ± 3.0 cmH2O at the time of CO2 gas-out, P < 0.001; 9.8 ± 2.3 vs. 12.5 ± 3.0 cmH2O at the time of recovery, P < 0.001). The alveolar recruitment maneuver with a pressure of 30 cmH2O for 30 s did not further reduce postoperative pulmonary complications when a low tidal volume and 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure were applied to patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery and was not associated with any significant adverse events. However, the alveolar recruitment maneuver significantly reduced intraoperative peak inspiratory pressure. Further study is needed to validate the beneficial effect of the alveolar recruitment maneuver in patients at increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03681236).

Apneustic anesthesia ventilation improves pulmonary function in anesthetized bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

Introduction

Use of mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia is a necessary practice in the anesthetization of small cetaceans as spontaneous ventilation fails to provide adequate gas exchange. Currently available methods of ventilation do not account for the intermittent breathing strategy of representative species within this infraorder of fully aquatic mammals and may have a significant effect on cardiac and respiratory physiology.

Methods

To understand the impact of mechanical ventilation on cardiopulmonary function in one small species of cetacean, the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), we compared controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) to a novel ventilation method known as apneustic anesthesia ventilation (AAV). AAV simulates the normal inspiratory breath-hold pattern of dolphins. Ten anesthetic procedures (dental procedure, n = 9; bronchoscopy, n = 2) were performed on nine dolphins (age range: 10-42 years; mean = 32 years; median = 37 years; female = 3, 40%; male = 6, 60%). In a cross-over study design, dolphins were instrumented and randomly assigned to AAV or CMV as the initial mode of ventilation, then switched to the alternate mode. Baseline cardiopulmonary data were collected and again after 30 min on each mode of ventilation. Cardiac index, stroke volume index, systemic vascular resistance, alveolar dead space, alveolar-arterial oxygen tension gradient, arterial oxygen content, oxygen delivery index, and dynamic respiratory system compliance index were calculated at each of the four time points.

Results

During AAV, dolphins had higher arterial oxygen tension, higher mean airway pressure, reduced alveolar dead space ventilation and lower alveolar-arterial oxygen difference. Cardiovascular performance was not statistically different between the two modes.

Discussion

Our study suggests AAV, which more closely resembles the conscious intermittent respiratory pattern phenotype of dolphins, improves ventilation and pulmonary function in the anesthetized dolphin. Future studies should evaluate the cardiopulmonary effects of neutral buoyancy and cardiopulmonary sparing drug protocols to reduce the need for hemodynamic support of current protocols.

Stubborn hypoxemia after mild to moderate sedation and analgesia: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Atelectasis typically denotes the partial or complete collapse of lung segments, lobes, or lobules in individuals, leading to a compromised respiratory function. The prevalence of perioperative atelectasis may be significantly underestimated, particularly among patients subjected to general anesthesia.

PATIENT CONCERNS

This article conducts a retrospective analysis of a case involving refractory hypoxemia in a patient with a liver tumor who was admitted to Yanbian University Affiliated Hospital (Yanbian Hospital) after undergoing mild-to-moderate sedation and analgesia outside the operating room.

DIAGNOSIS

Based on the results of CT examination and present history, the patient was diagnosed with intraoperative atelectasis.

INTERVENTION

After the surgery, the patient was transferred to the recovery ward, where nasal oxygen therapy and nebulized inhalation treatment were administered. Vital signs were closely monitored at the bedside, gradually returning to the preoperative baseline.

OUTCOME

Postoperatively, the patient developed atelectasis, with the percentage of lung opacity shown in the image decreasing from 9.2% of the total thoracic cage area to 8.4%.

CONCLUSION

During non-intubated intravenous anesthesia, patients with compromised pulmonary conditions are more susceptible to refractory hypoxemia. Therefore, a personalized approach should be adopted regarding oxygen concentration and the dosage and type of medication. Additionally, preparations for appropriate airway management measures are essential to safeguard patient safety in the event of respiratory issues.

Effect of Mechanical Ventilation Mode Type on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

It is unknown whether there is a difference in pulmonary outcome in different intraoperative ventilation modes for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The aim of this trial was to determine whether patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB could benefit from intraoperative optimal ventilation mode.

DESIGN

This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a single-center tertiary-care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1,364 adults undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB participated in this trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were assigned randomly (1:1:1) to receive 1 of 3 ventilation modes: volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), and pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG). All arms of the study received the lung-protective ventilation strategy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within the first 7 postoperative days. Pulmonary complications occurred in 168 of 455 patients (36.9%) in the PCV-VG group, 171 (37.6%) in the PCV group, and 182 (40.1%) in the VCV group, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the risk of overall pulmonary complications among groups (p = 0.585). There were no significant differences in the severity grade of PPCs within 7 days, postoperative ventilation duration, intensive care unit stay, postoperative hospital stay, or 30-day postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB, intraoperative ventilation mode type did not affect the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Preoperative preparation and postoperative care in children in thoracic surgery

Anesthesia for pediatric patients undergoing thoracic surgery continues to be distinctive due to differing anatomical and physiological characteristics compared to adults. Adequate preoperative preparation, appropriate tool selection for providing one-lung ventilation, perioperative pain management, and a multidisciplinary approach can ensure higher quality postoperative care. In this review, the perioperative anesthesia management for pediatric patients undergoing thoracic surgery will be discussed, starting from the preoperative preparation phase. Additionally, the issues related to the application and management of one-lung ventilation will also be assessed.

[Perioperative hyperoxia-More harmful than beneficial?]

BACKGROUND

The ideal perioperative oxygen concentration is controversial and study results are inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

Current knowledge on the beneficial and adverse effects of perioperative hyperoxia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Narrative review RESULTS: Perioperative hyperoxia is unlikely to increase the incidence of atelectasis, pulmonary or cardiovascular complications or mortality. Few and small potential beneficial effects, such as reduction of surgical wound infections or postoperative nausea and vomiting have been demonstrated. According to the current state of evidence, it is recommended to avoid perioperative hyperoxia and to aim for normoxia instead.

Different positive end expiratory pressure and tidal volume controls on lung protection and inflammatory factors during surgical anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation can lead to the severe impairment of the metabolic pathway of alveolar surfactants, inactivating alveolar surfactants and significantly reducing lung-chest compliance. The cardiopulmonary function of elderly patients usually reduced to a certain extent, and there are lung complications after surgical anesthesia, just like lung barotrauma caused by mechanical ventilation, atelectasis and postoperative hypoxemia.

AIM

To investigate the effects of different positive end expiratory pressures (PEEPs) and tidal volumes (VTs) on respiratory function, the degree of the inflammatory response and hemodynamic indexes in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients undergoing surgery for gastric or colon cancer under general anesthesia in Xinghua People's Hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were randomly divided into Group A and Group B, with 60 cases in each group. The ventilation mode in Group A was VT (6.0 mL/kg) + PEEP (5.0 cmH2O), while that in Group B was VT (6.0 mL/kg) + PEEP (8.0 cmH2O). Blood gas parameters, respiratory mechanical parameters, inflammatory response indicators, hemodynamic indicators and related complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in PaCO2, PaO2, oxygen or the examined indexes at T0 between group A and group B (P > 0.05). The measured PaO2 value of patients in group A at T3 was higher than that in group B, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in peak airway pressure (Ppeak), mean airway pressure or dynamic pulmonary compliance (Cdyn) at T0 between group A and group B (P > 0.05). The measured Ppeak value of patients in group A at T1 was higher than that in group B, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The measured Cdyn value at T1 and T2 was greater than that in group B (P < 0.05). Before surgery, there were no significant differences in tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6 or IL-10 between group A and group B (P > 0.05). After 4 h, the measured values of TNF-α and IL-6 in group A were lower than those in group B, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05). The IL-10 Level in group A was higher than that in group B (P < 0.05). At T0, there were no significant differences in cardiac output, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI) or mean arterial pressure between group A and group B (P > 0.05). The measured values of CI and SVI at T2 in patients in group A were higher than those in group B, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing surgery for gastric or colon cancer under general anesthesia, the VT (6.0 mL/kg) + PEEP (5.0 cmH2O) regimen was more effective than the VT (6.0 mL/kg) + PEEP (8.0 cmH2O) regimen in protecting the lung function and ventilatory function of patients, and it had better effects on maintaining hemodynamic stability and reducing inflammatory reactions.

A structured narrative review of clinical and experimental studies of the use of different positive end-expiratory pressure levels during thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to present a review on the general effects of different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels during thoracic surgery by qualitatively categorizing the effects into detrimental, beneficial, and inconclusive.

DATA SOURCE

Literature search of Pubmed, CNKI, and Wanfang was made to find relative articles about PEEP levels during thoracic surgery. We used the following keywords as one-lung ventilation, PEEP, and thoracic surgery.

RESULTS

We divide the non-individualized PEEP value into five grades, that is, less than 5, 5, 5-10, 10, and more than 10 cmH₂ O, among which 5 cmH₂ O is the most commonly used in clinic at present to maintain alveolar dilatation and reduce the shunt fraction and the occurrence of atelectasis, whereas individualized PEEP, adjusted by test titration or imaging method to adapt to patients' personal characteristics, can effectively ameliorate intraoperative oxygenation and obtain optimal pulmonary compliance and better indexes relating to respiratory mechanics.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data suggest that PEEP might play an important role in one-lung ventilation, the understanding of which will help in exploring a simple and economical method to set the appropriate PEEP level.

Is there a role for lung-protective ventilation in healthy children?

Lung-protective ventilation (LPV) has been adopted in the theater environment as a strategy to reduce pulmonary complications under anesthesia. Postoperative pulmonary complications are not infrequent and may have significant implications on the postoperative length of stay as well as the morbidity and mortality of pediatric patients. There is evidence in the adult literature to suggest that intraoperative LPV strategies may reduce the risk of such complications. The utility of LPV strategies in healthy children is not well researched, and the data from critical care studies appear to be conflicting. To ascertain the value of intraoperative LPV in pediatric patients, it is important to understand the pathophysiology of pediatric ventilator-induced lung injury and the basis of LPV strategies. The current evidence in adult and pediatric populations, including pediatric intensive care, is reviewed to gain insight into the role and value of intraoperative LPV for pediatric patients.

Respiratory Mechanics

Today's management of the ventilated patient still relies on the measurement of old parameters such as airway pressures and flow. Graphical presentations reveal the intricacies of patient-ventilator interactions in times of supporting the patient on the ventilator instead of fully ventilating the heavily sedated patient. This opens a new pathway for several bedside technologies based on basic physiologic knowledge; however, it may increase the complexity of measurements. The spread of the COVID-19 infection has confronted the anesthesiologist and intensivist with one of the most severe pulmonary pathologies of the last decades. Optimizing the patient at the bedside is an old and newly required skill for all physicians in the intensive care unit, supported by mobile technologies such as lung ultrasound and electrical impedance tomography. This review summarizes old knowledge and presents a brief insight into extended monitoring options.

Intraoperative protective ventilation in patients undergoing major neurosurgical interventions: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPC) can develop in up to 13% of patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures and may adversely affect clinical outcome. The use of intraoperative lung protective ventilation (LPV) strategies, usually including the use of a low V_t, low PEEP and low plateau pressure, seem to reduce the risk of PPC and are strongly recommended in almost all surgical procedures. Nonetheless, feasibility of LPV strategies in neurosurgical patients are still debated because the use of low Vt during LPV might result in hypercapnia with detrimental effects on cerebrovascular physiology. Aim of our study was to determine whether LPV strategies would be feasible compared with a control group in adult patients undergoing cranial or spinal surgery.

METHODS

This single-centre, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted at the University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità" (Novara, Italy). Adult patients undergoing major cerebral or spinal neurosurgical interventions with risk index for pulmonary post-operative complications > 2 and not expected to need post-operative intensive care unit (ICU) admission were considered eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to either LPV (Vt = 6 ml/kg of ideal body weight (IBW), respiratory rate initially set at 16 breaths/min, PEEP at 5 cmH2O and application of a recruitment manoeuvre (RM) immediately after intubation and at every disconnection from the ventilator) or control treatment (Vt = 10 ml/kg of IBW, respiratory rate initially set at 6-8 breaths/min, no PEEP and no RM). Primary outcomes of the study were intraoperative adverse events, the level of cerebral tension at dura opening and the intraoperative control of PaCO_2. Secondary outcomes were the rate of pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications, the number of unplanned ICU admissions, ICU and hospital lengths of stay and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients, 30 for each group, were randomized. During brain surgery, the number of episodes of intraoperative hypercapnia and grade of cerebral tension were similar between patients randomized to receive control or LPV strategies. No difference in the rate of intraoperative adverse events was found between groups. The rate of postoperative pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications and major clinical outcomes were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LPV strategies in patients undergoing major neurosurgical intervention are feasible. Larger clinical trials are needed to assess their role in postoperative clinical outcome improvements.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ( www.anzctr.org.au ), registration number ACTRN12615000707561.

Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients

BACKGROUND

This study compared the hemodynamic effects and gas exchange under several different ventilator settings-with regard to tidal volume, respiratory rate, and end-expiratory pressure-in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

Prospective interventional cohort study with a controlled group in a single cardiosurgical ICU involving 119 patients following on-pump CABG surgery. During the 1st postoperative hour, the intervention group patients were ventilated with Vt 10 ml × kg-1, RR 14/min, PEEP 5 cmH2O ("conventional ventilation"). During the 2nd hour, RR was reduced to 8/min ("reduced RR ventilation"). At 3 hrs, Vt was decreased to 6 ml × kg-1, RR returned to 14/min, and PEEP increased to 10 cmH2O ("low Vt-high PEEP ventilation").

RESULTS

Patients in the "low Vt-high PEEP" ventilation period showed significantly lower alveolar ventilation and thoraco-pulmonary compliance than during "reduced RR" ventilation. Mean airway pressure and Vds/Vt peaked during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation; however, driving pressure was lower. Vt decrease and PEEP increase did not lead to oxygenation improvement and worsened CO2 elimination. Hemodynamically, the study revealed significant cardiac output decrease during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation. In 23.2% of patients, catecholamine therapy was initiated.

CONCLUSIONS

In postoperative cardiosurgical patients, MV with Vt 6 ml × kg-1 and PEEP 10 cm H2O is characterized by worsened oxygenation and elimination of CO2 and a less favorable hemodynamic profile than ventilation with Vt 10 ml × kg-1 and PEEP 5 cmH2O. New and Noteworthy. (i) Patients after CABG may be especially sensitive to low tidal volume and increased PEEP as it negatively affects hemodynamic profile by means of the right heart preload decrease and afterload increase. (ii) Mechanical ventilation settings aiming to minimize mean airway pressure reduce the negative effects of positive inspiratory pressure and are favorable for hemodynamics.