1
|
Breitkopf M, Ahrens E, Herrmann ML, Heinemann S, Kuester O, Ma H, Walther A, Thomas C, Eschweiler GW, von Arnim CAF, Wagner S. Preoperative hypoxic biomarkers and postoperative delirium in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Anesth 2024:10.1007/s00540-024-03417-2. [PMID: 39495288 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-024-03417-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative delirium (POD) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with increased mortality and healthcare costs. In this study, we investigated the association of OSA risk, serum biomarkers for central nervous ischemia (S100B and NSE), and POD. METHODS After research ethics approval, patients completed the STOP BANG assessment before undergoing elective surgery. Blood was drawn for S100B and NSE measurement, and cognitive performance was tested using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at study admission and postoperatively at discharge. Delirium assessment was performed using the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (NuDESC) and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). RESULTS One hundred twenty-four enrolled patients were separated into three OSA-risk groups based on STOP BANG score testing (low risk, n = 22; intermediate risk, n = 67; high risk, n = 35). Preoperative NSE values increased with OSA risk (NSE in ng/ml; mean [range]; low risk: 15.6 [9.2-44.3]; intermediate risk: 21.8 [7.6-114.1]; high risk: 29.2 [10.1-151]; p = 0.039). Postoperative MoCA and NuDESC assessments were not different between the OSA-risk groups. We found a decreasing incidence for POD with increasing OSA risk (positive CAM: low risk: 18.1%, intermediate risk: 12.0%; high risk: 11.5%, p = 0.043). However, this was no longer detectable in a complete case analysis. In patients with POD, postoperative ischemic biomarker values were not different between OSA-risk groups. CONCLUSION We found a trend of decreasing POD incidence with increasing OSA risk, which was not robust in a complete case analysis. Our results possibly support the phenomenon of hypoxic preconditioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Breitkopf
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Katharinenhospital Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthias L Herrmann
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Geriatric Center, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephanie Heinemann
- Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Olivia Kuester
- Department of Neurology, Universitaetsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Haobo Ma
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Andreas Walther
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Katharinenhospital Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Christine Thomas
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Stuttgart, Krankenhaus Bad Cannstatt, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Gerhard W Eschweiler
- Geriatric Center, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Soeren Wagner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Katharinenhospital Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
von Wedel D, Redaelli S, Wachtendorf LJ, Ahrens E, Rudolph MI, Shay D, Chiarella LS, Suleiman A, Munoz-Acuna R, Ashrafian S, Seibold EL, Woloszynek S, Chen G, Talmor D, Banner-Goodspeed V, Eikermann M, Oriol NE, Schaefer MS. Association of anaesthesia provider sex with perioperative complications: a two-centre retrospective cohort study. Br J Anaesth 2024; 133:628-636. [PMID: 38926028 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies suggested that surgeon sex is associated with differential patient outcomes. Whether this also applies to anaesthesia providers is unclear. We hypothesised that female sex of the primary anaesthesia provider is associated with lower risk of perioperative complications. METHODS The first case for all adult patients undergoing anaesthesia care between 2008 and 2022 at two academic healthcare networks in the USA was included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary exposure was the sex of the anaesthesia provider who spent the most time in the operating theatre during the case. The primary outcome was intraoperative complications, defined as hypotension (mean arterial blood pressure <55 mm Hg for ≥5 cumulative minutes) or hypoxaemia (oxygen saturation <90% for >2 consecutive minutes). The co-primary outcome was 30-day adverse postoperative events (including complications, readmission, and mortality). Analyses were adjusted for a priori defined confounders. RESULTS Among 364,429 included patients, 57,550 (15.8%) experienced intraoperative complications and 55,168 (15.1%) experienced adverse postoperative events. Care by female compared with male anaesthesia providers was associated with lower risk of intraoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-0.97, P<0.001), which was magnified among non-trainees (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.82-0.87, P-for-interaction<0.001). Anaesthesia provider sex was not associated with the composite of adverse postoperative events (aOR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02, P=0.88). CONCLUSIONS Care by a female anaesthesia provider was associated with a lower risk of intraoperative complications, which was magnified among non-trainees. Future studies should investigate underlying mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario von Wedel
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simone Redaelli
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maíra I Rudolph
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Denys Shay
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laetitia S Chiarella
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Ricardo Munoz-Acuna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Ashrafian
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eva-Lotte Seibold
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen Woloszynek
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Guanqing Chen
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Talmor
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Valerie Banner-Goodspeed
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthias Eikermann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nancy E Oriol
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma H, Ahrens E, Wachtendorf LJ, Suleiman A, Shay D, Munoz-Acuna R, Tartler TM, Teja B, Wagner S, Subramaniam B, Rhee J, Schaefer MS. Intraoperative Use of Phenylephrine versus Ephedrine and Postoperative Delirium: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology 2024; 140:657-667. [PMID: 37725759 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of intraoperative hypotension with phenylephrine may impair cerebral perfusion through vasoconstriction, which has been linked to postoperative delirium. The hypothesis was that intraoperative administration of phenylephrine, compared to ephedrine, is associated with higher odds of postoperative delirium. METHODS A total of 103,094 hospitalized adults undergoing general anesthesia for noncardiac, non-neurosurgical procedures between 2008 and 2020 at two tertiary academic healthcare networks in Massachusetts were included in this multicenter hospital registry study. The primary exposure was the administration of phenylephrine versus ephedrine during surgery, and the primary outcome was postoperative delirium within 7 days. Multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for a priori defined confounding variables including patient demographics, comorbidities, and procedural factors including magnitude of intraoperative hypotension were applied. RESULTS Between the two healthcare networks, 78,982 (76.6%) patients received phenylephrine, and 24,112 (23.4%) patients received ephedrine during surgery; 770 patients (0.8%) developed delirium within 7 days. The median (interquartile range) total intraoperative dose of phenylephrine was 1.0 (0.2 to 3.3) mg and 10.0 (10.0 to 20.0) mg for ephedrine. In adjusted analyses, the administration of phenylephrine, compared to ephedrine, was associated with higher odds of developing postoperative delirium within 7 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.71; and adjusted absolute risk difference, 0.2%; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.3%; P = 0.015). A keyword and manual chart review-based approach in a subset of 45,465 patients further validated these findings (delirium incidence, 3.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.37; P < 0.001). Fractional polynomial regression analysis further indicated a dose-dependent effect of phenylephrine (adjusted coefficient, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.14; P = 0.013, per each μg/kg increase in the cumulative phenylephrine dose). CONCLUSIONS The administration of phenylephrine compared to ephedrine during general anesthesia was associated with higher odds of developing postoperative delirium. Based on these data, clinical trials are warranted to determine whether favoring ephedrine over phenylephrine for treatment of intraoperative hypotension can reduce delirium after surgery. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haobo Ma
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elena Ahrens
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Luca J Wachtendorf
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aiman Suleiman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Denys Shay
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ricardo Munoz-Acuna
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tim M Tartler
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bijan Teja
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Soeren Wagner
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Balachundhar Subramaniam
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine and Sadhguru Center for a Conscious Planet, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James Rhee
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maximilian S Schaefer
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gao Y, Zhou Q, Li H, Zhao Y, Zhu H, Zhang X, Li Y. Melanin-Concentrating Hormone Is Associated With Delayed Neurocognitive Recovery in Older Adult Patients With Preoperative Sleep Disorders Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2024; 138:579-588. [PMID: 38051670 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aging and preoperative sleep disorders are the main risk factors affecting postoperative cognitive outcomes. However, the pathogenesis of delayed neurocognitive recovery after surgery remains ambiguous, and there is still a lack of potential biomarkers for delayed neurocognitive recovery in older adult patients with preoperative sleep disorders. Our study aimed to explore the relationship between melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) and delayed neurocognitive recovery early after surgery in older adult patients with preoperative sleep disorders. METHODS In this monocentric prospective observational study, 156 older adult patients (aged 65 years or older) with preoperative sleep disorders undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were included at an academic medical center in Inner Mongolia, China, from October 2021 to November 2022, and all patients underwent spinal anesthesia. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was applied to assess the preoperative sleep quality of all patients, and preoperative sleep disorders were defined as a score of PSQI >5. We measured the levels of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) MCH and plasma MCH of all patients. The primary outcome was delayed neurocognitive recovery early after surgery. All patients received cognitive function assessment through the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) 1 day before and 7 days after surgery (postoperative day 7 [POD7]). Delayed neurocognitive recovery was defined as a score of POD7 MoCA <26. The potential confounders included variables with P < .2 in the univariate logistic analysis, as well as the important risk factors of delayed neurocognitive recovery reported in the literature. Multivariable logistic regression model based on the Enter method assessed the association of MCH and delayed neurocognitive recovery in older adult patients with preoperative sleep disorders. RESULTS Fifty-nine (37.8%) older adult patients with preoperative sleep disorders experienced delayed neurocognitive recovery at POD7. Increase in CSF MCH levels (odds ratio [OR] for an increase of 1 pg/mL = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.23, P < .001) and decrease in plasma MCH levels (OR for an increase of 1 pg/mL = 0.92, 95% CI, 0.86-0.98, P = .003) were associated with delayed neurocognitive recovery, after adjusting for age, sex, education, baseline MoCA scores, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and coronary heart disease (CHD). CONCLUSIONS In older adult patients with preoperative sleep disorders, MCH is associated with the occurrence of delayed neurocognitive recovery after surgery. Preoperative testing of CSF MCH or plasma MCH may increase the likelihood of identifying the high-risk population for delayed neurocognitive recovery in older adult patients with preoperative sleep disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Gao
- From the Chifeng Clinical Medical College of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Chifeng, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, China
| | - Qi Zhou
- From the Chifeng Clinical Medical College of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Chifeng, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, China
| | - Haibo Li
- From the Chifeng Clinical Medical College of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Chifeng, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, China
| | - Yunjiao Zhao
- From the Chifeng Clinical Medical College of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Chifeng, China
| | - Hongyan Zhu
- From the Chifeng Clinical Medical College of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Chifeng, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, China
| | - Xizhe Zhang
- From the Chifeng Clinical Medical College of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Chifeng, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, China
| | - Yun Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Research Institute of Anesthesiology, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zheng J, Wang L, Wang W, Zhang H, Yao F, Chen J, Wang Q. Association and prediction of subjective sleep quality and postoperative delirium during major non-cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:306. [PMID: 37697244 PMCID: PMC10494396 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02267-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative delirium (POD) is an acute form of brain dysfunction that can result in serious adverse consequences. There has been a link between cognitive dysfunction and poor sleep. The present study aimed to determine the association and prediction of subjective sleep quality and postoperative delirium during major non-cardiac surgery. METHODS One hundred and thirty-four patients, aged 60 years or older, were scheduled for elective laparotomy or orthopaedic procedures. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and sleep log were used to assess perioperative subjective sleep quality in participants. Nursing Delirium Screening Checklist (NU-DESC) was used for screening, and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) was used to diagnose POD during the first seven days following surgery. The association between subjective sleep quality and POD was assessed using a multivariate logistic regression model. Thereafter, the prediction performance of subjective sleep quality was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS All assessments were completed on 119 patients who had an average PSQI score of 7.0 ± 2.4 before surgery. 23 patients (19.3%) suffered from POD. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the occurrence of POD was closely related to age, BMI, PSQI and operation time. After adjusting for related factors, there was a statistically significant association between PSQI and POD occurrence (OR = 1.422, 95%CI 1.079-1.873, per 1-point increase in PSQI). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal PSQI cutoff value was 8.0 for predicting POD, and the area under the ROC (AUROC) value of PSQI was 0.741 (95%CI 0.635 to 0.817). The AUROC of the model developed by the multivariate logistic regression analysis was 0.870 (95%CI 0.797 to 0.925). CONCLUSIONS The study found that preoperative subjective sleep quality was strongly associated with POD during major non-cardiac surgery. Additionally, PSQI combined with age, BMI, and operation time improved POD prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinwei Zheng
- Department of anesthesiology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200120, China
- Department of anesthesiology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lulu Wang
- Department of anesthesiology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of anesthesiology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Huafeng Zhang
- Department of anesthesiology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fangfang Yao
- Nursing department, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Junping Chen
- Department of anesthesiology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Qingxiu Wang
- Department of anesthesiology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200120, China.
| |
Collapse
|