Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: validity of a second generation device

Efficacy of Stroke Volume Variation, Cardiac Output and Cardiac Index as Predictors of Fluid Responsiveness using Minimally Invasive Vigileo Device in Intracranial Surgeries

Introduction:

Functional hemodynamic monitoring using dynamic parameters such as stroke volume variations (SVVs) based on pulse contour analysis is considered more accurate than central venous pressure and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in predicting fluid responsiveness. New device, i.e., Vigileo system, allows automatic and continuous monitoring of cardiac output (CO) based on pulse contour analysis and respiratory stroke volume.

Aim:

The study aims to test the above hypothesis using graded volume loading step (VLS) to assess the accuracy of SVV as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing intracranial surgery.

Materials and Methods:

After taking ethical committee approval and informed consent, 60 patients aged between 18 and 55 years belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Class I and II, of either sex, scheduled for brain surgery were included in the study. In this study, 5 min after intubation, with stable hemodynamics, patients received volume loading in successive steps (VLS) of 200 ml of lactated Ringer's solution until the stroke volume increased to <10%. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and SVV were measured before and after each VLS. Optimal preload augmentation required by each patient was measured by the number of VLS after which an increase in SV was <10%.

Results:

There was a significant decrease in the baseline BP and SV in responsive and nonresponsive groups for the first VLS, but there is no change in HR statistically. There was a significant change in SV after first VLS. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed a larger area under the curve of 0.758 for SVV compared to other measured variables. The median number of VLS administered were 2 per patient equating to a mean ± SD requirement of 368 ± 176 ml of crystalloid per patient as the optimal preoperative infusion volume.

Conclusion:

SVV is a better predictor of preload responsiveness measured with third-generation Vigileo device when compared to BP and HR.

The Combined Use of Cardiac Output and Intracranial Pressure Monitoring to Maintain Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure and Minimize Complications for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Objective

To show the effect of dual monitoring including cardiac output (CO) and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patiens. We hypothesized that meticulous treatment using dual monitoring is effective to sustain maintain minimal intensive care unit (ICU) complications and maintain optimal ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) for severe TBI patiens.

Methods

We included severe TBI, below Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 8 and head abbreviation injury scale (AIS) >4 and performed decompressive craniectomy at trauma ICU of our hospital. We collected the demographic data, head AIS, injury severity score (ISS), initial GCS, ICU stay, sedation duration, fluid therapy related complications, Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 3 months and variable parameters of ICP and CO monitor.

Results

Thirty patients with severe TBI were initially selected. Thirteen patients were excluded because 10 patients had fixed pupillary reflexes and 3 patients had uncontrolled ICP due to severe brain edema. Overall 17 patients had head AIS 5 except 2 patients and 10 patients (58.8%) had multiple traumas as mean ISS 29.1. Overall complication rate of the patients was 64.7%. Among the parameters of CO monitoring, high stroke volume variation is associated with fluid therapy related complications (p=0.043) and low cardiac contractibility is associated with these complications (p=0.009) statistically.

Conclusion

Combined use of CO and ICP monitors in severe TBI patients who could be necessary to decompressive craniectomy and postoperative sedation is good alternative methods to maintain an adequate ICP and CPP and reduce fluid therapy related complications during postoperative ICU care.

Assessment of Stroke Volume Variation Perioperatively by Using Arterial Pressure with Cardiac Output

OBJECTIVE

To observe the sensitivity of stroke volume variation (SVV) for assessing volume change during induction period of general anesthesia.

METHODS

Patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery under general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation were divided into two groups randomly. Patients in the group Ⅰwere subjected to progressive central hypovolemia and correction of hypovolemia sequentially; patients in the Group Ⅱ were exposed to hypervolemia alone. Each step was implemented after 5 minutes when the hemodynamics was stable. SVV and cardiac index (CI) were recorded, and Pearson's product-moment correlation was used to analyze correlation between SVV and CI.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included in this study, 20 cases in each group. For group Ⅰ patients, SVV was increased significantly along with blood volume reduction, and changes in CI were negatively correlated with changes in SVV (r=-0.605, P<0.01); SVV decreased significantly along with correction of blood volume; changes in CI were negatively correlated with changes in SVV (r=-0.651, P<0.01). For group Ⅱ patients, along with blood volume increase, SVV did not change significantly; changes in CI revealed no significant correlation with changes in SVV (r=0.067, P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

SVV is a useful indicator for hypovolemia, but not for hypervolemia.

Changes in myocardial lactate, pyruvate and lactate-pyruvate ratio during cardiopulmonary bypass for elective adult cardiac surgery: Early indicator of morbidity

BACKGROUND

Myocardial lactate assays have been established as a standard method to compare various myocardial protection strategies. This study was designed to test whether coronary sinus (CS) lactates, pyruvate and lactate-pyruvate (LP) ratio correlates with myocardial dysfunction and predict postoperative outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted on 40 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). CS blood sampling was done for estimation of myocardial lactate (ML), pyruvate (MP) and lactate-pyruvate ratio (MLPR) namely: pre-CPB (T(1)), after removal of aortic cross clamp (T(2)) and 30 minutes post-CPB (T(3)).

RESULTS

Baseline myocardial LPR strongly correlated with Troponin-I at T1 (σ: 0.6). Patients were sub grouped according to the median value of myocardial lactate (2.9) at baseline T1 into low myocardial lactate (LML) group, mean (2.39±0.4 mmol/l), n=19 and a high myocardial lactate (HML) group, mean (3.65±0.9 mmol/l), n = 21. A significant increase in PL, ML, MLPR and TropI occurred in both groups as compared to baseline. Patients in HML group had significant longer period of ICU stay. Patients with higher inotrope score had significantly higher ML (T2, T3). ML with a baseline value of 2.9 mmol/l had 70.83% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity (ROC area: 0.7109 Std error: 0.09) while myocardial pyruvate with a baseline value of 0.07 mmol/l has 79.17% sensitivity and 68.75% specificity (ROC area: 0.7852, Std error: 0.0765) for predicting inotrope requirement after CPB.

CONCLUSION

CS lactate, pyruvate and LP ratio correlate with myocardial function and can predict postoperative outcome.

Crystalloid and colloid preload for maintaining cardiac output in elderly patients undergoing total hip replacement under spinal anesthesia

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of colloid and crystalloid preload on cardiac output (CO) and incidence of hypotension in elderly patients under spinal anesthesia (SA). A randomized, double-blinded study was conducted including 47 elderly patients undergoing scheduled total hip replacement (THR), who were randomized to three groups: the control group (C group, n = 15), crystalloid (RS group, n =16) and colloid group (HES group, n = 16). An intravenous preload of 8 mL/kg of either lactated Ringer's solution in the RS group or 6% hydroxyethyl starch in the HES group was infused within 20 min before SA induction, while no intravenous preload was given in the C group. There was a trend of decrease in CO and systolic blood pressure after SA with time in the C group. In the RS and HES groups, CO increased significantly after fluid preloading as compared with baseline (P < 0.01). Thereafter, CO remained higher than baseline until 30 min after SA in the HES group. The change of systolic blood pressure was similar to CO, but no significant difference from baseline was observed in each group. Hypotension occurred in 3 patients in the C group and one each in the RS and HES group, respectively (P = 0.362). Intravascular volume preload with colloid is more effective than crystalloid solution in maintaining CO, which may be improved the hemodynamic stability in elderly patients during SA.

Cardio-renal syndromes: a systematic approach for consensus definition and classification

The "Cardio-Renal Syndrome" (CRS) is a disorder of the heart and kidneys whereby acute or chronic dysfunction in one organ may induce acute or chronic dysfunction of the other. The general definition has been expanded to five subtypes reflecting the primacy of organ dysfunction and the time-frame of the syndrome: CRS type I: acute worsening of heart function (AHF-ACS) leading to kidney injury and/or dysfunction. CRS type II: chronic abnormalities in heart function (CHF-CHD) leading to kidney injury or dysfunction. CRS type III: acute worsening of kidney function (AKI) leading to heart injury and/or dysfunction. CRS type IV: chronic kidney disease (CKD) leading to heart injury, disease and/or dysfunction. CRS type V: systemic conditions leading to simultaneous injury and/or dysfunction of heart and kidney. Different pathophysiological mechanisms are involved in the combined dysfunction of heart and kidney in these five types of the syndrome.

A comparison of pulse contour wave analysis and ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring in the critically ill

Cardiac output (CO) is a key determinant of major organ blood flow and solute delivery to drug eliminating organs. As such, CO assessment is a key covariate in understanding altered drug handling in the critically ill. Newer minimally-invasive devices are providing unique platforms for such an application, although comparison data are currently lacking. In this study we evaluated the Vigileo (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) and USCOM (USCOM Ltd, Sydney, NSW) devices in 62 critically ill patients requiring antibacterial therapy. The mean COVigileo and COUSCOM for the first paired measurements were 8.20±2.65 l/minute and 6.84±2.57 l/minute respectively (P <0.001). A significant correlation was evident in all patients (r=0.537, P <0.001) although the recorded bias was large (1.36±2.51 l/minute, limits of agreement -3.6 to±6.3 l/minute). The overall percentage error was 65%. There was an improved correlation in those admitted with sepsis (r=0.639, P <0.001), compared to trauma (r=0.373, P=0.066), although bias, precision and percentage error were similar in both subgroups. In 54 patients a second paired assessment was obtained at three hours. A weak, although significant correlation (r=0.377, P=0.005) was observed suggesting that gross trends over time were similar. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate poor agreement between these techniques suggesting that these devices are not simply interchangeable when assessing CO in a research or clinical setting.

Performance of Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system during hyperdynamic therapy for delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage

Background:

Monitoring of cardiac output (CO) is important for promising safe approach to goal-directed hemodynamic therapy for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but is often precluded by the invasiveness and complexity of ongoing monitoring modalities. We examined the clinical utility of less-invasive management using an uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform-derived cardiac output (APCO) monitor with refined algorithm (Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo, Edwards, Irvine, CA, USA) during hyperdynamic therapy for post-SAH DCI, compared with transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCO, Pulsion, Munich, Germany) as a reference technique.

Methods:

Forty-five patients who underwent surgical clipping within 24 h of SAH onset and subsequently developed clinical deterioration attributable to DCI were investigated. Validation of the APCO-derived cardiac index (CI) during dobutamine-induced hyperdynamic therapy was compared with a reference CI analyzed by transpulmonary thermodilution in 20 patients. In a subsequent trial of 48 cases, the overall clinical results from patients managed with each device were compared.

Results:

The APCO underestimated CI with an overall bias ± SD of 0.33 ± 0.26 L/min/m² compared with transpulmonary thermodilution, resulting in an error of 14.9%. The trends of CI for both techniques at each dobutamine dose were similar (r²= 0.77; P < 0.0001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the device groups for frequencies of neurological improvement, cerebral infarction, cardiopulmonary complications, or functional outcomes at 3 months.

Conclusions:

These data suggest that the refined APCO tends to underestimate CI compared with reference transpulmonary thermodilution during hyperdynamic therapy with dobutamine for reversing DCI, but may be acceptable in this select category of patients to obtain comparable clinical results.

Hemodynamic changes during robotic radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Effect on hemodynamic changes and experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) in steep Trendelenburg position (45°) with high-pressure CO(2) pneumoperitoneum is very limited. Therefore, we planned this prospective clinical trial to study the effect of steep Tredelenburg position with high-pressure CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamic parameters in a patient undergoing RALRP using FloTrac/Vigileo™1.10.

METHODS

After ethical approval and informed consent, 15 patients scheduled for RALRP were included in the study. In the operation room, after attaching standard monitors, the radial artery was cannulated. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (2 μg/kg) and thiopentone (4-7 mg/kg), and tracheal intubation was facilitated by vecuronium bromide (0.1 mg/kg). The patient's right internal jugular vein was cannulated and the Pre Sep™ central venous oximetry catheter was connected to it. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen and nitrous oxide and intermittent boluses of vecuronium. Intermittent positive-pressure ventilation was provided to maintain normocapnea. After CO(2) pneumoperitoneum, position of the patient was gradually changed to 45° Trendelenburg over 5 min. The robot was then docked and the robot-assisted surgery started. Intraoperative monitoring included central venous pressure (CVP), stroke volume (SV), stroke volume variation (SVV), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI) and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO(2)).

RESULTS

After induction of anesthesia, heart rate (HR), SV, CO and CI were decreased significantly from the baseline value (P>0.05). SV, CO and CI further decreased significantly after creating pneumoperitoneum (P>0.05). At the 45° Trendelenburg position, HR, SV, CO and CI were significantly decreased compared with baseline. Thereafter, CO and CI were persistently low throughout the 45° Trendelenburg position (P=0.001). HR at 20 min and 1 h, SV and mean arterial blood pressure after 2 h decreased significantly from the baseline value (P>0.05) during the 45° Trendelenburg position. CVP increased significantly after creating pneumoperitoneum and at the 45° Trendelenburg position (after 5 and 20 min) compared with the baseline postinduction value (P>0.05). All these parameters returned to baseline after deflation of CO(2) pneumoperitoneum in the supine position. There were no significant changes in SVV and ScvO(2) throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The steep Trendelenburg position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum, during RALRP, leads to significant decrease in stroke volume and cardiac output.

Accuracy of cardiac output measurements during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: according to the vessel anastomosis sites

Background

During beating heart surgery, the accuracy of cardiac output (CO) measurement techniques may be influenced by several factors. This study was conducted to analyze the clinical agreement among stat CO mode (SCO), continuous CO mode (CCO), arterial pressure waveform-based CO estimation (APCO), and transesophageal Doppler ultrasound technique (UCCO) according to the vessel anastomosis sites.

Methods

This study was prospectively performed in 25 patients who would be undergoing elective OPCAB. Hemodynamic variables were recorded at the following time points: during left anterior descending (LAD) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min; during obtuse marginal (OM) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min: and during right coronary artery (RCA) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min. The variables measured including the SCO, CCO, APCO, and UCCO.

Results

CO measurement techniques showed different correlations according to vessel anastomosis site. However, the percent error observed was higher than the value of 30% postulated by the criteria of Critchley and Critchley during all study periods for all CO measurement techniques.

Conclusions

In the beating heart procedure, SCO, CCO and APCO showed different correlations according to the vessel anastomosis sites and did not agree with UCCO. CO values from the various measurement techniques should be interpreted with caution during OPCAB.

Applications of minimally invasive cardiac output monitors

Because of the increasing age of the population, critical care and emergency medicine physicians have seen an increased number of critically ill patients over the last decade. Moreover, the trend of hospital closures in the United States t imposes a burden of increased efficiency. Hence, the identification of devices that facilitate accurate but rapid assessments of hemodynamic parameters without the added burden of invasiveness becomes tantamount. The purpose of this review is to understand the applications and limitations of these new technologies.

Cardiac output monitoring devices: an analytic review

To evaluate cardiac output (CO), both invasive and semi-invasive monitors are used in critical care medicine. The pulmonary artery catheter is an invasive tool to assess CO with the major criticism that the level of its invasiveness is not supported by an improvement in patients' outcomes. The interest in a lesser invasive techniques is high. Therefore, alternative techniques have been developed recently, and are used frequently in critical care medicine. Cardiac output can be monitored continuously by different devices that analyze the stroke volume and CO. The purpose of this review is to understand these new technologies and their applications and limitations.

Cardio-renal syndromes: from foggy bottoms to sunny hills

"Cardio-renal syndromes" (CRS) are disorders of the heart and kidneys whereby acute or chronic dysfunction in one organ may induce acute or chronic dysfunction of the other. The current definition has been expanded into five subtypes whose etymology reflects the primary and secondary pathology, the time-frame and simultaneous cardiac and renal co-dysfunction secondary to systemic disease: CRS type I: acute worsening of heart function (AHF-ACS) leading to kidney injury and/or dysfunction. CRS type II: chronic abnormalities in heart function (CHF-CHD) leading to kidney injury or dysfunction. CRS type III: acute worsening of kidney function (AKI) leading to heart injury and/or dysfunction. CRS type IV: chronic kidney disease (CKD) leading to heart injury, disease and/or dysfunction. CRS type V: systemic conditions leading to simultaneous injury and/or dysfunction of heart and kidney. These different subtypes may have a different pathophysiological mechanism and they may represent separate entities in terms of prevention and therapy.

Focused bedside echocardiography in the surgical intensive care unit: comparison of 3 methods to estimate cardiac index

We sought to determine which of 3 methods used to evaluate cardiac index (CI) is the most accurate using focused bedside echocardiography (ECHO). We hypothesized that the fractional shortening (FS) method would provide a more accurate estimate of CI than the left ventricular outflow tract/velocity-time integral (LVOT/VTI) or Simpson's methods. This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in the surgical ICU of an urban level 1 trauma center utilizing all patients with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in place. Three surgical intensive care unit (SICU) faculty and 3 fellows underwent focused cardiac ultrasound training. Focused ECHO exams-bedside echocardiographic assessment in trauma/critical care (BEAT)- were performed using the Sonosite portable ultrasound device (Bothall, Washington). Stroke volume (SV) measurements were prospectively obtained on all trauma/SICU patients, with a PAC in place, using FS, LVOT/VTI, and Simpson's methods. The investigators were blinded to the PAC data. From each measurement, CI was calculated and categorized as low, normal, or high, based on a normal range of 2.4 to 4.0 L/min per m(2). Each CI obtained from the PAC was similarly categorized. The association between the BEAT and PAC estimates of CI was evaluated for each method using chi-square goodness of fit. Eighty five BEAT exams were performed on consecutive SICU patients, 56% were on trauma and 44% on emergency general surgery patients. There was a statistically significant association between the CI estimate using the FS method (P = .012), but not the LVOT/VTI (P = .33) or Simpson's method (P = .74). Our data showed a significant association between the PAC estimate of CI and our estimate using the FS method. The other methods were difficult to obtain, subjective, and inaccurate. Fractional shortening was the method of choice to estimate CI for the BEAT exam performed by intensivists in SICU patients.

Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

In the present review we will describe and discuss the physiological and technological background necessary in understanding the dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness and how they relate to recent softwares and algorithms' applications. We will also discuss the potential clinical applications of these parameters in the management of patients under general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation along with the potential improvements in the computational algorithms.

Inferior vena cava variation compared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Both occult hypoperfusion and volume overload are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Accurately predicting fluid responsiveness (FRes) allows for optimization of cardiac performance while avoiding fluid overload and prolonged mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVE

To simultaneously assess the ability to predict FRes using the stroke volume variation (SVV) obtained with the Vigileo/Flotrac monitor and inferior vena cava respiratory variation (ΔIVC) measured by standard echocardiography ([ECHO) during mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

We included medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing mechanical ventilation that required vasopressors, had worsening organ function, and that were well adapted to the ventilator. We excluded patients requiring escalating doses of vasopressors, hemodialysis, with ascites and patients with atrial fibrillation or a heart rate >120/min. Stroke volume index (SVI) and SVV were obtained from the Vigileo monitor whereas ΔIVC was obtained with ECHO (M-mode). Doppler ECHO was used to measure SVI and used to determine FRes (defined by SVI increase ≥ 10%). A data set was obtained before and 30 minutes after a 10-minute fluid challenge (FC) with 500 mL of saline.

RESULTS

In all, 25 patients were prospectively enrolled over an 8-month period. A total of 12 patients had acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 3 had a cardiac arrest, and 10 had sepsis. The patients' mean age was 61.36 years (±13.7), study enrollment since ICU admission was 3.4 days (±3.39), the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was 12.44 (±2.59), and the tidal volume 8.6 mL/kg (±1.68). Of the 25 patients, 8 (32%) were FRes. The correlation coefficient between the baseline ΔIVC and percentage increase in SVI (by ECHO) after an FC was R(2) = .51 with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.81 while that for the baseline SVV by Vigileo was R(2) = .12 with an ROC curve of 0.57. The mean SVI bias between ECHO and Vigileo was -2 mL/m(2), the precision was -18 to 14 and the mean error was 46%.

CONCLUSIONS

ECHO assessment of the IVC variation during mechanical ventilation may prove to be a useful technique to predict FRes and guide fluid resuscitation in the ICU. The SVV obtained with the Vigileo monitor failed to predict FRes likely due to lack of calibration and the use of a complex algorithm that may be unreliable in patients with sepsis.

Cardiac output assessed by invasive and minimally invasive techniques

Cardiac output (CO) measurement has long been considered essential to the assessment and guidance of therapeutic decisions in critically ill patients and for patients undergoing certain high-risk surgeries. Despite controversies, complications and inherent errors in measurement, pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) continuous and intermittent bolus techniques of CO measurement continue to be the gold standard. Newer techniques provide less invasive alternatives; however, currently available monitors are unable to provide central circulation pressures or true mixed venous saturations. Esophageal Doppler and pulse contour monitors can predict fluid responsiveness and have been shown to decrease postoperative morbidity. Many minimally invasive techniques continue to suffer from decreased accuracy and reliability under periods of hemodynamic instability, and so few have reached the level of interchangeability with the PAC.

Evaluation of a new software version of the FloTrac/Vigileo (version 3.02) and a comparison with previous data in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplant surgery

BACKGROUND

Reliable cardiac output monitoring is particularly useful in the cirrhotic patient undergoing liver transplant surgery, because cirrhosis of the liver is associated with a vasodilated and high output state, known as cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, that challenges the reliability of pulse contour cardiac output technology. The contractility of the ventricle in cirrhosis is impaired, which is tolerated even though the ejection fraction and cardiac output are elevated because of the low peripheral resistance. However, during surgery the cirrhotic patient can decompensate because of the physiological changes and stress of surgery. Recently, we showed that the FloTrac/Vigileo™ failed to perform in cirrhotic patients undergoing transplant surgery. In response, the company upgraded their software. Therefore, we have assessed the accuracy and reliability of this new third-generation (version 3.02) FloTrac/Vigileo algorithm software in the same setting.

METHODS

The cardiac index was measured simultaneously by single-bolus thermodilution (CI(TD)), using a pulmonary artery catheter, and pulse contour analysis, using the FloTrac/Vigileo (CI(V)). Readings were made at 10 time points during and after liver transplant surgery in 21 patients. Comparisons with data from our 2009 study, which used second-generation (version 01.10) software, were also made.

RESULTS

Our new data show that version 3.02 software significantly reduced the adverse effect on pulse contour cardiac output reading bias in low peripheral resistance states, and thus improves the overall precision and trending ability of the system. Regression analysis between CI(TD) and CI(V) showed that the correlation was moderate (r =0.67, 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.86). The Bland and Altman analysis showed that bias was 0.4 L.min(-1) · m(-2), and the percentage error was 52% (95% confidence interval, 49% to 55%). Trending ability of the new software also was improved but was still well below the current benchmarks.

CONCLUSION

The new software (version 3.02) provided substantial improvements over the previous versions with better overall precision and trending ability. Further algorithm refinements will increase this technology's reliability to be extensively used in the highly complex setting of cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output

Many methods of cardiac output measurement have been developed, but the number of methods useful for human pharmacological studies is limited. The 'holy grail' for the measurement of cardiac output would be a method that is accurate, precise, operator independent, fast responding, non-invasive, continuous, easy to use, cheap and safe. This method does not exist today. In this review on cardiac output methods used in pharmacology, the Fick principle, indicator dilution techniques, arterial pulse contour analysis, ultrasound and bio-impedance are reviewed.

The uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output during off-pump coronary bypass surgery: performance in patients with a low cardiac output status and a reduced left ventricular function

BACKGROUND

We compared the continuous cardiac index measured by the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system (FCI) to that measured by a pulmonary artery catheter (CCI) with emphasis on the accuracy of the FCI in patients with a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a low cardiac output status during off-pump coronary bypass surgery (OPCAB). We also assessed the influence of several factors affecting the pulse contour, such as the mean arterial pressure (MAP), the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and the use of norepinephrine.

METHODS

Fifty patients who were undergoing OPCAB (30 patients with a LVEF ≥ 40%, 20 patients with a LVEF < 40%) were enrolled. The FCI and CCI were measured and we performed a Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analyses were done according to the LVEF (< 40%), the CCI (≤ 2.4 L/min/m), the MAP (60-80 mmHg), the SVRI (1,600-2,600 dyne/s/cm(5)/m(2)) and the use of norepinephrine.

RESULTS

The FCI was reliable at all the time points of measurement with an overall bias and limit of agreement of -0.07 and 0.67 L/min/m(2), respectively, resulting in a percentage error of 26.9%. The percentage errors in the patients with a decreased LVEF and in a low cardiac output status were 28.2% and 22.3%, respectively. However, the percentage error in the 91 data pairs outside the normal range of the SVRI was 40.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The cardiac output measured by the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system was reliable even in patients with a decreased LVEF and in a low cardiac output status during OPCAB. Acceptable agreement was also noted during the period of heart displacement and grafting of the obtuse marginalis branch.

Performance of cardiac output measurement derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy

BACKGROUND

Arterial pressure waveform analysis of cardiac output (APCO) without external calibration (FloTrac/Vigileo™) is critically dependent upon computation of vascular tone that has necessitated several refinements of the underlying software algorithms. We hypothesized that changes in vascular tone induced by high-dose vasopressor therapy affect the accuracy of APCO measurements independently of the FloTrac software version.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, we assessed the validity of uncalibrated APCO measurements compared with transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output (TPCO) measurements in 24 patients undergoing vasopressor therapy for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage.

RESULTS

Patients received vasoactive support with [mean (sd)] 0.53 (0.46) µg kg(-1) min(-1) norepinephrine resulting in mean arterial pressure of 104 (14) mm Hg and mean systemic vascular resistance of 943 (248) dyn s(-1) cm(-5). Cardiac output (CO) data pairs (158) were obtained simultaneously by APCO and TPCO measurements. TPCO ranged from 5.2 to 14.3 litre min(-1), and APCO from 4.1 to 13.7 litre min(-1). Bias and limits of agreement were 0.9 and 2.5 litre min(-1), resulting in an overall percentage error of 29.6% for 68 data pairs analysed with the second-generation FloTrac(®) software and 27.9% for 90 data pairs analysed with the third-generation software. Precision of the reference technique was 2.6%, while APCO measurements yielded a precision of 29.5% and 27.9% for the second- and the third-generation software, respectively. For both software versions, bias (TPCO-APCO) correlated inversely with systemic vascular resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

In neurosurgical patients requiring high-dose vasopressor support, precision of uncalibrated CO measurements depended on systemic vascular resistance. Introduction of the third software algorithm did not improve the insufficient precision (>20%) for APCO measurements observed with the second software version.

Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients

Purpose

Second-generation FloTrac software has been shown to reliably measure cardiac output (CO) in cardiac surgical patients. However, concerns have been raised regarding its accuracy in vasoplegic states. The aim of the present multicenter study was to investigate the accuracy of the third-generation software in patients with sepsis, particularly when total systemic vascular resistance (TSVR) is low.

Methods

Fifty-eight septic patients were included in this prospective observational study in four university-affiliated ICUs. Reference CO was measured by bolus pulmonary thermodilution (iCO) using 3–5 cold saline boluses. Simultaneously, CO was computed from the arterial pressure curve recorded on a computer using the second-generation (CO_G2) and third-generation (CO_G3) FloTrac software. CO was also measured by semi-continuous pulmonary thermodilution (CCO).

Results

A total of 401 simultaneous measurements of iCO, CO_G2, CO_G3, and CCO were recorded. The mean (95%CI) biases between CO_G2 and iCO, CO_G3 and iCO, and CCO and iCO were −10 (−15 to −5)% [−0.8 (−1.1 to −0.4) L/min], 0 (−4 to 4)% [0 (−0.3 to 0.3) L/min], and 9 (6–13)% [0.7 (0.5–1.0) L/min], respectively. The percentage errors were 29 (20–37)% for CO_G2, 30 (24–37)% for CO_G3, and 28 (22–34)% for CCO. The difference between iCO and CO_G2 was significantly correlated with TSVR (r² = 0.37, p < 0.0001). A very weak (r² = 0.05) relationship was also observed for the difference between iCO and CO_G3.

Conclusions

In patients with sepsis, the third-generation FloTrac software is more accurate, as precise, and less influenced by TSVR than the second-generation software.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-010-2098-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cardiac output monitoring: is there a gold standard and how do the newer technologies compare?

As a principal determinant of oxygen delivery and of blood pressure, cardiac output (CO) represents an important hemodynamic variable. Its accurate measurement, therefore, is important to the clinician caring for critically ill patients in a variety of care environments. Though the first clinical measurement of CO occurred 70 years ago, it was the introduction of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) with thermodilution-based determination of CO in the 1970s that set the stage for practical and widespread clinical measurement of CO. Although the usefulness and accuracy of this technique have justified its consideration as a "practical" gold standard in CO measurement, its drawbacks have driven the search for newer, less invasive measurement techniques. The last decade has seen the introduction of several such devices into the clinical arena. This article will serve to give a brief review of the history of CO measurement, to provide a discussion of the measurement of accuracy as it relates to CO measurement, and to discuss some of the newer methods and devices for CO measurement and how they have fared against a "practical" gold standard.

Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study

Introduction

Stroke volume variation (SVV) is a good and easily obtainable predictor of fluid responsiveness, which can be used to guide fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. During major abdominal surgery, inappropriate fluid management may result in occult organ hypoperfusion or fluid overload in patients with compromised cardiovascular reserves and thus increase postoperative morbidity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of SVV guided fluid optimization on organ functions and postoperative morbidity in high risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

Methods

Patients undergoing elective intraabdominal surgery were randomly assigned to a Control group (n = 60) with routine intraoperative care and a Vigileo group (n = 60), where fluid management was guided by SVV (Vigileo/FloTrac system). The aim was to maintain the SVV below 10% using colloid boluses of 3 ml/kg. The laboratory parameters of organ hypoperfusion in perioperative period, the number of infectious and organ complications on day 30 after the operation, and the hospital and ICU length of stay and mortality were evaluated. The local ethics committee approved the study.

Results

The patients in the Vigileo group received more colloid (1425 ml [1000-1500] vs. 1000 ml [540-1250]; P = 0.0028) intraoperatively and a lower number of hypotensive events were observed (2[1-2] Vigileo vs. 3.5[2-6] in Control; P = 0.0001). Lactate levels at the end of surgery were lower in Vigileo (1.78 ± 0.83 mmol/l vs. 2.25 ± 1.12 mmol/l; P = 0.0252). Fewer Vigileo patients developed complications (18 (30%) vs. 35 (58.3%) patients; P = 0.0033) and the overall number of complications was also reduced (34 vs. 77 complications in Vigileo and Control respectively; P = 0.0066). A difference in hospital length of stay was found only in per protocol analysis of patients receiving optimization (9 [8-12] vs. 10 [8-19] days; P = 0.0421). No difference in mortality (1 (1.7%) vs. 2 (3.3%); P = 1.0) and ICU length of stay (3 [2-5] vs. 3 [0.5-5]; P = 0.789) was found.

Conclusions

In this study, fluid optimization guided by SVV during major abdominal surgery is associated with better intraoperative hemodynamic stability, decrease in serum lactate at the end of surgery and lower incidence of postoperative organ complications.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95085011.

Arterial pressure-based cardiac output in septic patients: different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices

INTRODUCTION

We compared the ability of two devices estimating cardiac output from arterial pressure-curve analysis to track the changes in cardiac output measured with transpulmonary thermodilution induced by volume expansion and norepinephrine in sepsis patients.

METHODS

In 80 patients with septic circulatory failure, we administered volume expansion (40 patients) or introduced/increased norepinephrine (40 patients). We measured the pulse contour-derived cardiac index (CI) provided by the PiCCO device (CIpc), the arterial pressure waveform-derived CI provided by the Vigileo device (CIpw), and the transpulmonary thermodilution CI (CItd) before and after therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The changes in CIpc accurately tracked the changes in CItd induced by volume expansion (bias, -0.20 +/- 0.63 L/min/m2) as well as by norepinephrine (bias, -0.05 +/- 0.74 L/min/m2). The changes in CIpc accurately detected an increase in CItd >or= 15% induced by volume expansion and norepinephrine introduction/increase (area under ROC curves, 0.878 (0.736 to 0.960) and 0.924 (0.795 to 0.983), respectively; P < 0.05 versus 0.500 for both). The changes in CIpw were less reliable for tracking the volume-induced changes in CItd (bias, -0.23 +/- 0.95 L/min/m2) and norepinephrine-induced changes in CItd (bias, -0.01 +/- 1.75 L/min/m2). The changes in CIpw were unable to detect an increase in CItd >or= 15% induced by volume expansion and norepinephrine introduction/increase (area under ROC curves, 0.564 (0.398 to 0.720) and 0.541 (0.377 to 0.700, respectively, both not significantly different from versus 0.500).

CONCLUSIONS

The CIpc was reliable and accurate for assessing the CI changes induced by volume expansion and norepinephrine. By contrast, the CIpw poorly tracked the trends in CI induced by those therapeutic interventions.

The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on macrophage migration inhibitory factor, C-reactive protein and fetuin-a levels

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication on blood levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), macrophage migration inhibitory factor and fetuin-A in patients with dyspepsia who are concurrently infected with H. pylori.

METHODS

H.pylori infection was diagnosed based on the 14C urea breath test (UBT) and histology. Lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily were given to all infected patients for 14 days; 14C UBT was then re-measured. In 30 subjects, migration inhibitory factor, fetuin-A and hs-CRP levels were examined before and after the eradication of H. pylori infection and compared to levels in 30 healthy subjects who tested negative for H. pylori infection.

RESULTS

Age and sex distribution were comparable between patients and controls. Migration inhibitory factor and hs-CRP levels were higher, and fetuin-A levels were lower, in H. pylori-infected patients (p<0.05). Following eradication of H. pylori, migration inhibitory factor and hs-CRP levels were significantly decreased, whereas fetuin-A levels were increased. However, eradication of the organism did not change lipid levels (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that H. pylori eradication reduces the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as migration inhibitory factor and hs-CRP and also results in a significant increase in anti-inflammatory markers such as fetuin-A.

Clinical evaluation of the flotrac/Vigileo system for continuous cardiac output monitoring in patients undergoing regional anesthesia for elective cesarean section: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery may cause severe maternal hypotension and a decrease in cardiac output. Compared to assessment of cardiac output via a pulmonary artery catheter, the FloTrac/Vigileo system may offer a less invasive technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiac output and other hemodynamic measurements made using the FloTrac/Vigileo system in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section.

METHODS

A prospective study enrolling 10 healthy pregnant women was performed. Hemodynamic parameters were continuously obtained at 15 main points: admission to surgery (two baseline measurements), after preload, after spinal anesthesia administration and 4 time points thereafter (4, 6, 8 and 10 min after anesthesia), at skin and uterine incision, newborn and placental delivery, oxytocin administration, end of surgery, and recovery from anesthesia. Hemodynamic therapy was guided by mean arterial pressure, and vasopressors were used as appropriate to maintain baseline values. A repeated measures ANOVA was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in heart rate and a decrease of stroke volume and stroke volume index up to 10 min after spinal anesthesia (P < 0.01). Importantly, stroke volume variation increased immediately after newborn delivery (P < 0.001) and returned to basal values at the end of surgery. Further hemodynamic parameters showed no significant changes over time.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

No significant hemodynamic effects, except for heart rate and stroke volume changes, were observed in pregnant women managed with preload and vasopressors when undergoing elective cesarean section and spinal anesthesia.

Effects of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on left ventricular relaxation and compliance: a comprehensive perioperative echocardiography study

AIMS

The short-term effect of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on diastolic function is only moderately investigated. Furthermore, it remains unknown whether avoidance of cardioplegic arrest by an off-pump CABG procedure has advantages over on-pump procedure regarding diastolic relaxation and compliance. We investigated whether components of diastolic function would be improved the day after CABG depending on the type of the surgical procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Spontaneously breathing on-pump (n = 20) and off-pump CABG (n = 12) patients underwent a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography examination the day before and the day after elective CABG, including transmitral and pulmonary vein flow parameters, colour M-mode flow propagation velocity (Vp) and tissue Doppler assessment of the average mitral annulus diastolic velocity (Em). Isovolumic relaxation and E-wave deceleration time were corrected for heart rate (IVRTcHR and DTcHR). Left ventricular (LV) relaxation time (τ) and LV operating stiffness (LVOS) were calculated. Overall and independent from operation type and preload, CABG decreased IVRTcHR (107 ± 20 vs. 93 ± 15 ms) (P < 0.01) and τ (54 ± 10 vs. 45 ± 10 ms) (P < 0.01), increased Vp (49 ± 22 vs. 75 ± 37 cm/s) (P < 0.01), and increased Em (6.6 ± 2.0 vs. 7.3 ± 1.3 cm/s, P = 0.06), indicating improved relaxation. LVOS increased (0.13 ± 0.06 vs. 0.22 ± 0.05 mmHg/mL) (P < 0.01), compatible with an impaired compliance. A similar improvement in relaxation and impairment in compliance were observed in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Myocardial relaxation improved the day after CABG irrespective of the use of cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest. Impairment in compliance could not be prevented by the avoidance of cardioplegia.

Comparison of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis with continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE

Monitoring of cardiac output is required during anesthesia for off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Recently, FloTrac, a new device for arterial pressure waveform analysis for cardiac output (APCO) monitoring without external calibration, was developed. The authors have compared APCO with STAT-mode continuous cardiac output (SCCO) in patients undergoing OPCAB surgery.

DESIGN

A clinical study.

SETTING

A university hospital (single institution).

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty consecutive patients undergoing elective OPCAB surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Arterial pressure measurement with FloTrac, pulmonary arterial catheter insertion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

APCO and SCCO measurements were recorded after pulmonary artery catheter insertion (T1), after sternotomy (T2), after heart positioning for left anterior descending artery anastomosis (T3, T4), after heart positioning for obtuse marginal artery anastomosis (T5, T6), after heart positioning for posterior descending artery anastomosis (T7, T8), and after sternal closure (T9). APCO and SCCO were compared using the Bland-Altman method and the percentage error by Critchley's criteria. SCCO and APCO ranged from 2.1 to 6.9 L/min and 1.2 to 7.4 L/min, respectively, and showed low correlation (r = 0.29). The overall bias by the Bland-Altman method between SCCO and APCO was -0.23 L/min, with a precision of -1.4 to 0.9 L/min, and the overall limits of agreement were -2.5 to 2.0 L/min. The overall mean CO was 4.0 ± 0.95 L/min. The overall percentage error between SCCO and APCO measurements was 57%.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncalibrated APCO values do not agree with thermodilution SCCO and significantly overestimated the SCCO in patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. Further evaluation is required to verify the clinical acceptance of FloTrac APCO in OPCAB surgery.

Assessment of a Cardiac Output Device using Arterial Pulse Waveform Analysis, VigileoTM, in Cardiac Surgery Compared to Pulmonary Arterial Thermodilution

Many devices are available to assess cardiac output (CO) in critically ill patients and in the operating room. Classical CO monitoring via a pulmonary artery catheter involves continuous cardiac output (CCO) measurement. The second generation of Flotrac/VigileoTM monitors propose an analysis of peripheral arterial pulse waves to calculate CO (APCO) without calibration. The aim of our study was to compare the CO between the Swan Ganz catheter and the VigileoTM. In this observational study, nine patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively included. APCO, mean (CCO) and instantaneous CO (ICO) were measured. Perioperative and postoperative assessments were performed up to 24 hours post-surgery. Measurements were recorded every minute, resulting in the collection of 6492 data pairs. Comparison of APCO and ICO showed a limited bias of -0.1 l/min but an important percentage error of 48%. Corresponding values were -0.1 l/min and 46% for the APCO versus CCO comparison, and 0 and 17% for ICO versus CCO comparison. Large inter-individual variability does exist. During cardiac surgery and after leaving the operating room, VigileoTM is not clinically equivalent to continuous thermodilution by pulmonary artery catheter. Nevertheless, the connection between CCO and ICO relates the difference between APCO and CCO more to the different algorithms used. Further efforts should be concentrated on assessing the ability of this device to track changes in cardiac output.

Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery

BACKGROUND

Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) are robust indicators of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated supine patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of PPV and SVV to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in the prone position (PP) during scoliosis surgery.

METHODS

Thirty subjects were studied after the induction of anaesthesia in the supine position [before and after volume expansion (VE) with 500 ml of hetastarch 6%] and in PP (immediately after PP and before and after VE). PPV, SVV, cardiac output (CO), and static compliance of the respiratory system were recorded at each interval. Subjects were defined as responders (Rs) to VE if CO increased > or =15%.

RESULTS

Three subjects were excluded. In the supine position, 16 subjects were Rs. PPV and SVV before VE were correlated with VE-induced changes in CO (r(2)=0.64, P<0.0001 and r(2)=0.56, P<0.0001, respectively). Fluid responsiveness was predicted by PPV >11% (sensitivity=88%, specificity=82%) and by SVV >9% (sensitivity=88%, specificity=91%). PP induced an increase in PPV and SVV (P<0.0001) and a decrease in the static compliance of the respiratory system (P<0.0001). In PP, 17 patients were Rs. PPV and SVV before VE were correlated with VE-induced changes in CO (r(2)=0.59, P<0.0001 and r(2)=0.55, P<0.0005, respectively). Fluid responsiveness was predicted in PP by PPV >15% (sensitivity=100%, specificity=80%) and by SVV >14% (sensitivity=94%, specificity=80%).

CONCLUSIONS

PP induces a significant increase in PPV and SVV but does not alter their abilities to predict fluid responsiveness.

Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac output (CO) and other flow-based hemodynamic variables have become increasingly important to guide treatment of patients undergoing major surgery with expected fluid shifts in the operating room as well as critically ill ICU patients. Established techniques such as pulmonary artery thermodilution, however, might not be justified in all of these patients. As arterial access is commonly available, less-invasive arterial pressure waveform-based CO devices are becoming more and more popular.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many studies dealing with arterial pressure waveform-based CO have emerged in recent years providing additional information with regard to accuracy of the different commercially available devices. Furthermore, methods of comparative CO studies have been recently brought into question.

SUMMARY

Although there are differences in invasiveness and the need for external calibration, all available devices provide parameters for enhanced hemodynamic monitoring. Initial validation studies of the more established techniques such as the pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) or LiDCO were recently met with less enthusiasm, whereas the initially disappointing validation studies of the FloTrac/Vigileo device had encouraging results after software updates. The pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) technique has not so far been sufficiently evaluated to be able to come to a conclusion. Further investigation is required with regard to the ability of the arterial pressure waveform-based methods to guide goal-directed therapy.