Relative analgesic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for caudal anesthesia in children

The minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal block in anorectal surgery. A dose finding study

Background

Caudal epidural block (CEB) provides reliable anesthesia for adults undergoing anorectal surgery. Despite the widely utilization, the minimum effective concentration for 90% patients (MEC₉₀) of ropivacaine for CEB remains unknown.

Objective

To estimate MEC of ropivacaine for CEB in anorectal surgery.

Design

A prospective dose-finding study using biased coin design up-and-down sequential method.

Setting

Operating room and postoperative recovery area of Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital, from October 2019 to January 2020.

Patients

50 males and 51 females scheduled for anorectal surgery.

Interventions

We conducted two independent biased coin design up-and down trials by genders. The concentration of ropivacaine administered to the first patient of male and female were 0.25% with fixed volume of 14ml for male and 12ml for female patients based on our previous study. In case of failure, the concentration was increased by 0.05% in the next subject. Otherwise, the next subject was randomized to a concentration 0.05% less with a probability of 0.11, or the same concentration with a probability of 0.89. Success was defined as complete sensory blockade of perineal area 15 min after the block evidenced by the presence of a lax anal sphincter and pain-free surgery.

Main outcome measures

The MEC of ropivacaine to achieve a successful CEB in 90%(MEC₉₀) of the patients.

Results

The MEC₉₀ of ropivacaine for CEB were estimated to be 0.35% (95% CI 0.29 to 0.4%) for male and 0.353% (95%CI 0.22 to 0.4%) for female. By extrapolation to MEC in 99% of subjects (MEC99) and pooled adjacent violators algorithm (PAVA) adjusted responses, it would be optimal to choose 0.4% ropivacaine with a volume of 14ml for male and 12ml for female.

Conclusions

A concentration of 0.35% ropivacaine with a volume of 14ml provided a successful CEB in 90% of the male patients, while 0.353% ropivacaine with a volume of 12ml provided a successful CEB in 90% of the female patients. A concentration of 0.4% and a volume of 14ml for male and 12 ml for female would be successful in 99% of the patients.

Trial registration

Chictr.org.cn identifier: No. ChiCTR 1900024315.

Effect of caudal ketamine on minimum local anesthetic concentration of ropivacaine in children: a prospective randomized trial

Background

Caudal ketamine has been shown to provide an effective and prolonged post-operative analgesia with few adverse effects. However, the effect of caudal ketamine on the minimum local anesthetic concentration (MLAC) of ropivacaine for intra-operative analgesia is unclear.

Methods

One hundred and sixty-nine children were randomized to five groups: Group C (caudal ropivacaine only), Group K_0.25 (caudal ropivacaine plus 0.25 mg/kg ketamine), Group K_0.5 (caudal ropivacaine plus 0.5 mg/kg ketamine), Group K_0.75 (caudal ropivacaine plus 0.75 mg/kg ketamine), and Group K_1.0 (caudal ropivacaine plus 1.0 mg/kg ketamine). The primary outcome was the MLAC values of ropivacaine with/without ketamine for caudal block.

Results

The MLAC values of ropivacaine were 0.128% (0.028%) in the control group, 0.112% (0.021%) in Group K_0.25, 0.112% (0.018%) in Group K_0.5, 0.110% (0.019%) in Group K_0.75, and 0.110% (0.020%) in Group K_1.0. There were no significant differences among the five groups for the MLAC values (p = 0.11). During the post-operative period the mean durations of analgesia were 270, 381, 430, 494, and 591 min in the control, K_0.25, K_{0. 5}, K_0.75, and K_1.0 groups respectively, which shown that control group is significantly different from all ketamine groups. Also there were significant differences between K_0.25 and K_0.75 groups, and between K_1.0 groups and the other ketamine groups.

Conclusions

Adding caudal ketamine to ropivacaine prolong the duration of post-operative analgesia; however, it does not decrease the MLAC of caudal ropivacaine for intra-operative analgesia in children.

Clinical trial registration

ChiCTR-TRC-13003492. Registered on 13 August 2013.

Postoperative pain management in children: Guidance from the pain committee of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA Pain Management Ladder Initiative)

The main remit of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA) Pain Committee is to improve the quality of pain management in children. The ESPA Pain Management Ladder is a clinical practice advisory based upon expert consensus to help to ensure a basic standard of perioperative pain management for all children. Further steps are suggested to improve pain management once a basic standard has been achieved. The guidance is grouped by the type of surgical procedure and layered to suggest basic, intermediate, and advanced pain management methods. The committee members are aware that there are marked differences in financial and personal resources in different institutions and countries and also considerable variations in the availability of analgesic drugs across Europe. We recommend that the guidance should be used as a framework to guide best practice.

Comparison of 0.5% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine for Sciatic Nerve Block Using Labat Approach in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Objective

Compared to ropivacaine, levobupivacaine is more lipophilic and a more potent vasoconstrictor. The study was conducted to compare the effect of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine in sciatic nerve block using conventional Labat approach in foot and ankle surgery.

Methods

A prospective double-blind, randomised study was carried out in 100 patients of either sex, aged between 20 to 60 years, and American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) grades I and II. Patients were randomly allocated into groups R and L of 50 each with 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine, respectively, for sciatic nerve block using the Labat approach. We assessed the onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, consumption of analgesic, and any untoward effect over 24 hours.

Results

Both the groups were comparable with regard to demographic variables and onset of sensory and motor block (p>0.05). Group L compared to group R had significantly longer median (95% confidence interval) duration of sensory block (647.50 min [624.99-674.41] vs. 535 min [524.77-559.83], respectively; p<0.0001) as well as motor block (1065.0 min [1054.5-1068.90] and 945 min [947.13-1013.30], respectively; p<0.0001). Postoperative analgesia also lasted significantly longer in group L compared to group R (1320 min [1273.4-1321.8] vs. 840 min [759.23-812.77]; p<0.0001]). Patients in group L had significantly better visual analogue scale (VAS) score and lesser consumption of analgesics (p<0.0001). None of the groups developed any adverse effect over the observation period.

Conclusion

Levobupivacaine provides prolonged postoperative analgesia in sciatic nerve block with reduction in postoperative analgesic consumption.

Caudal dexmedetomidine decreases the required concentration of levobupivacaine for caudal block in pediatric patients: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Dexmedetomidine (D) can prolong the duration of local anesthetics, but the effect of caudal dexmedetomidine on the potency of levobupivacaine (L) for caudal block has not been investigated. This study was designed to determine the effect of caudal dexmedetomidine on levobupivacaine for caudal block in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Eighty-nine children scheduled for elective inguinal hernia repair or hydrocele were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: Group L (caudal levobupivacaine), Group LD1 (levobupivacaine plus 1 μg·kg(-1) dexmedetomidine), or Group LD2 (levobupivacaine plus 2 μg·kg(-1) dexmedetomidine). The primary endpoint was the minimum local anesthetic concentration (MLAC), which was determined using the Dixon up-and-down method. The secondary endpoints were the duration of analgesia and sedation.

RESULTS

The MLAC values (sd) of caudal levobupivacaine were 0.103 (0.01)%, 0.068 (0.02)%, and 0.055 (0.03)% in Groups L, LD1, and LD2, respectively. The values of EC50 and EC95 (95% CI) of caudal levobupivacaine from logistic regression analysis were 0.094 (0.083-0.105)% and 0.129 (0.1-0.159)%, 0.058 (0.044-0.072)% and 0.106 (0.067-0.144)%, and 0.046 (0.033-0.059)% and 0.091 (0.055-0.127)% in Groups L, LD1, and LD2, respectively. The mean durations of analgesia in the postoperative period were 141, 378, and 412 min in Groups L, LD1, and LD2, respectively (L vs LD1 or LD2, P < 0.001). The mean durations of sedation in both Groups LD1 and LD2 also were significantly prolonged, compared with Group L (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Caudal dexmedetomidine reduces the MLAC values of levobupivacaine and improves postoperative analgesia in children without any neurological side effects.

Everyday regional anesthesia in children

Regional anesthesia in children is an evolving technique with many advantages in perioperative management. Although most regional anesthesia techniques are sufficiently described in the literature, the implementation of these techniques into daily clinical practice is still lacking. The main problems associated with pediatric regional anesthesia (PRA) include the appropriate selection of blockade, the management around the block, and how to teach these techniques in an optimal manner. This review article provides an overview of these 'hot' topics in PRA.

Effect of epidural clonidine on minimum local anesthetic concentration (ED50) of levobupivacaine for caudal block in children

BACKGROUND

Clonidine has the potential to significantly prolong the duration of caudal epidural anesthesia. We investigated the effect of the addition of clonidine to the MLAC of levobupivacaine in a randomized controlled dose-response trial.

METHODS

A group of 120 children aged <6 years of age received caudal anesthesia with levobupivacaine and 1, 2, or 3 μg·kg(-1) of clonidine. The MLAC was determined according to a Dixon-Massey protocol. The primary outcome was effective surgical anesthesia. Secondary outcomes were the duration of postoperative analgesia, postoperative pain scores, clonidine side effects, and time to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

The MLAC of caudal levobupivacaine was 0.106%, 0.077%, and 0.035% with 1, 2, and 3 μg·kg(-1) of clonidine, respectively. There were significant dose-dependent increases in median duration of analgesia. The incidence of delayed discharge, somnolence, and PONV was significantly increased in the 3 μg·kg(-1) of clonidine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Clonidine produces a local anesthetic sparing effect with a dose-dependent decrease in levobupivacaine MLAC for caudal anesthesia. In addition, there is a dose-dependent prolongation of postoperative analgesia following lower abdominal surgery in children. A dose of 2 μg·kg(-1) of clonidine provides the optimum balance between improved analgesia and minimal side effects.

Minimum local analgesic concentration of ropivacaine for intra-operative caudal analgesia in pre-school and school age children

We compared the minimum local analgesia concentration of ropivacaine for intra-operative caudal analgesia in pre-school and school age children. Fifty-one boys, undergoing hypospadius repair surgery, were stratified into pre-school or school age groups. After induction of anaesthesia, caudal block was performed with ropivacaine 1 ml.kg⁻¹ of the desired concentration. The first child in each group received ropivacaine 0.125%, and subsequent concentrations were determined by the analgesic response of the previous patient using Dixon's up-and-down method. Under general anaesthesia with 0.7 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane, the minimum local analgesia concentration of ropivacaine for intra-operative caudal block was 34% greater in school age than in pre-school age boys (0.143% (95% CI 0.132-0.157%) vs 0.107% (95% CI 0.089-0.122%), respectively; p < 0.001). This study indicates that a higher concentration of ropivacaine is needed for school age than pre-school age children to provide intra-operative caudal analgesia when combined with general anaesthesia.

Levobupivacaine 0.5% provides longer analgesia after sciatic nerve block using the Labat approach than the same dose of ropivacaine in foot and ankle surgery

BACKGROUND

Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine are 2 left enantiomeric molecules frequently used for peripheral nerve blocks because of their safe clinical profile. Levobupivacaine is more lipophilic and theoretically more potent than ropivacaine, but clinical studies show conflicting results in terms of anesthetic and analgesic characteristics. We hypothesized that the pure S-enantiomer of bupivacaine provides longer-lasting analgesia than ropivacaine.

METHODS

We compared the analgesic characteristics of 20 mL levobupivacaine versus 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% in a posterior sciatic nerve block (Labat approach) for foot and ankle surgery. In a double-blind, randomized, prospective design, 80 patients received either substance. We assessed the onset, duration, and success of the block, and the need for rescue analgesia and technical or neurologic complications over 24 hours.

RESULTS

The onset of sensory block (minutes) and the success rate were similar in levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups (onset, 15 minutes [5-40 minutes] vs 15 minutes [5-60 minutes], respectively; success rate, 90% vs 92.5%). The average time for the first request of pain medication provided by 20 mL levobupivacaine 0.5% was significantly longer than with ropivacaine (1605 minutes [575-2400 minutes] vs 1035 minutes [590-1500 minutes], P < 0.001). The need for postoperative rescue analgesia was higher in the ropivacaine group (37 of 40 [92.5%] vs 30 of 40 [75%], P < 0.034). No complications were noted in either group at 24 hours.

CONCLUSION

Twenty milliliters levobupivacaine 0.5% in posterior gluteal (Labat) sciatic nerve block provided longer-lasting analgesia after foot and ankle surgery compared with the same dose of ropivacaine.