The median effective dose of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine after intrathecal injection in lower limb surgery

The Options for Neuraxial Drug Administration

Neuraxial drug administration, i.e., the injection of drugs into the epidural or intrathecal space to produce anesthesia or analgesia, is a technique developed more than 120 years ago. Today, it still is widely used in daily practice in anesthesiology and in acute and chronic pain therapy. A multitude of different drugs have been introduced for neuraxial injection, only a part of which have obtained official approval for that indication. A broad understanding of the pharmacology of those agents is essential to the clinician to utilize them in a safe and efficient manner. In the present narrative review, we summarize current knowledge on neuraxial anatomy relevant to clinical practice, including pediatric anatomy. Then, we delineate the general pharmacology of neuraxial drug administration, with particular attention to specific aspects of epidural and intrathecal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Furthermore, we describe the most common clinical indications for neuraxial drug administration, including the perioperative setting, obstetrics, and chronic pain. Then, we discuss possible neurotoxic effects of neuraxial drugs, and moreover, we detail the specific properties of the most commonly used neuraxial drugs that are relevant to clinicians who employ epidural or intrathecal drug administration, in order to ensure adequate treatment and patient safety in these techniques. Finally, we give a brief overview on new developments in neuraxial drug therapy.

Effect of Pregabalin on the Median Effective Plasma Concentration of Intravenous Alfentanil in Capsaicin-Induced Pain

OBJECTIVE

To apply the sequential up-down method to a human experimental pain model in order to examine the opioid-sparing effect of oral pregabalin on intravenous alfentanil.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, crossover.

SETTING

Academic university medical center.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-one healthy males.

METHODS

The median effective plasma concentration of intravenous alfentanil was determined under two conditions: alfentanil alone (phase I) and alfentanil+ pregabalin (300 mg orally) (phase II). The alfentanil plasma level (after a computer-controlled infusion) producing a success criterion (at least 30% intradermal capsaicin-induced pain reduction compared with placebo) was used to determine higher or lower doses for each sequential subject. The median dose producing a success criterion and its confidence interval were determined.

RESULTS

On the basis of the t test for a difference across phase and regression coefficients across groups, there was no opioid-sparing effect of pregabalin on alfentanil. Four subjects in phase I and five subjects in phase II did not complete the study. Two in phase I were technical failures, with the rest in both phases stopped because of side effects. Of the subjects who completed the study, six of 19 subjects in phase I and 11 of 12 subjects in phase II reported side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

When the intradermal capsaicin-induced pain model was used in healthy volunteers, oral pregabalin had no opioid-sparing effects on intravenous alfentanil. This experimental model may be useful in studying analgesic interactions.

Comparing the minimum local anesthetic dose of ropivacaine in real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia and traditional landmark-guided spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial of knee surgery patients

Background

Through previous studies and clinical practice, we have found that real-time ultrasound-guided (UG) spinal anesthesia (SA) and traditional landmark-guided (LG) SA each require a different minimum local anesthetic dose (MLAD) of ropivacaine. For this study, we used Dixon’s up-and-down sequential method to analyze and compare the MLAD of different ropivacaine concentrations required for the UG and LG SA methods.

Methods

A total of 120 patients undergoing knee surgery were consecutively recruited and randomly divided into four groups (30 patients per group). These groups were categorized as follows: Group I: high ropivacaine ultrasound-guided (HRUG), Group II: low ropivacaine ultrasound-guided (LRUG), Group III: high ropivacaine landmark-guided (HRLG), and Group IV: low ropivacaine landmark-guided (LRLG). SA was established by a bolus administration of up-and-down doses of 0.75% or 0.5% plain ropivacaine. Initial doses of 16, 18, 12, and 14 mg were administered to groups I–IV, and after that, increased or decreased by 1.5 mg according to dose effectiveness. Upon identifying the intervertebral puncture level, a lumbar X-ray was performed with metal markers, and actual radiographic findings were identified and compared to the initial markings.

Results

For UG groups, the MLAD in the LRUG group was significantly higher than in the HRUG group [20.192 mg (95% CI, 19.256–21.174) versus 17.176 mg (95% CI, 16.276–18.124), respectively; P<0.001]. For LG groups, the MLAD in the LRLG group was significantly higher than in the HLRG group [14.478 mg (95% CI, 13.364–15.500) versus 13.201 mg (95% CI, 11.959–14.571), respectively; P=0.047]. When comparing both high ropivacaine groups (HRGs: I/III) to the low ropivacaine groups (LRGs: II/IV), we found that both UG subgroups (I/II) had a significantly higher MLAD than LG subgroups (III/IV) (P<0.001). US identified L4–5 in up to 90% of cases. Comparatively, palpation was successful in only 33.3% of patients. The rates of cephalad localization by US and palpation were 6.67% vs. 66.67%, respectively (P=0.002).

Conclusions

We found a higher MLAD of ropivacaine was required for UG SA at the L4–5 level due to the method providing a more accurate (less cephalad) localization than traditional LG SA.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000033158.

Intrathecal Use of Isobaric Levobupivacaine 0.5% Versus Isobaric Ropivacaine 0.75% for Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries

Background

This study was undertaken to compare and evaluate the efficacy of 3-ml 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine versus 3-ml 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine in patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries.

Methods

We allocated 60 patients into two groups (n=30 each) to receive either a spinal block of 3-ml 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine (group L) or 3-ml 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine (group R). Haemodynamic parameters were measured intraoperatively till the end of surgery and postoperatively for two hours. The onset and duration of sensory block and motor block were recorded. Adverse events were also recorded. The student’s unpaired t-test was used for comparing the continuous variables.

Results

The mean age in group L was 37.83 ±16.51 years and the mean age in group R was 38.50 ±12.97 years. The mean onset of sensory block in group L (6.97 ±1.82 mins) was significantly faster than in group R (8.47 ±2.55 mins), p<0.05. Similarly, so was the mean onset of motor block in group L (10.27 ±1.92 mins) versus group R (12.93 ±2.55 mins), p<0.05. The mean duration of sensory block in group L (147.63 ±27.53 mins) was significantly longer than in group R (97.40 ±12.38 mins), p<0.05, as was the mean duration of motor block in group L (207.33 ±22.27 mins) versus group R (146.60 ±21.22 mins), p<0.05. In group L, 13.3% of patients had complications, with hypotension being the most common (6.7%); in group R, 40% had complications, of which bradycardia was the most common (13.3%).

Conclusion

There was an earlier onset of sensory and motor block and prolonged duration of sensory and motor block with intrathecal administration of 3-ml 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine as compared to 3-ml 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine. Haemodynamic parameters were more stable with levobupivacaine than ropivacaine. Adverse effects were more common with ropivacaine.

Randomised Control Trial Comparing Plain Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Caesarean Deliveries

Objective

The study compared spinal block characteristics of equipotent doses of plain 0.5% levobupivacaine, plain 0.75% ropivacaine and hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine for elective caesarean (CS) delivery.

Methods

A total of 100 parturient women undergoing elective CS under spinal anaesthesia were enrolled for the study. The parturients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following in a subarachnoid block: hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine 10 mg (group B), plain 0.5% levobupivacaine 10 mg (group L), or plain 0.5% ropivacaine 15 mg (group R).

Results

Motor block duration [groups B, LB, R: 143.78 (30.43) minutes, 139.31 (33.38) minutes, 137.32 (27.39) minutes, respectively; P=0.80], sensory block duration [groups B, LB, R: 122.87 (34.93) minutes, 113.03 (39.24) minutes, 125.58 (24.93) minutes, respectively; p=0.30] and first analgesic request time [groups B, LB, R: 136.87 (28.70) minutes, 133.59 (27.30) minutes, 144.19 (32.09) minutes, respectively; p=0.35] were statistically comparable. The groups were statistically comparable for sensory block onset time [T6 block; groups B, LB, R: 4.62 (2.80) minutes, 4.93 (2.63) minutes, 5.73 (3.00) minutes, respectively; p=0.29] but motor block onset time was statistically prolonged for group R as compared to group B [Bromage 3 block; group B, LB, R: 5.93 (3.41) minutes, 9.00 (4.00) minutes, 10.16 (5.66) minutes, respectively; p=0.001]. No statistically significant differences were seen in sensory and motor block recovery times, haemodynamic parameters or side-effects.

Conclusion

The anaesthesia from a spinal block with 10 mg plain levobupivacaine or 15 mg plain ropivacaine is comparable to the anaesthetic effect of 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine in elective caesarean deliveries.

Local anaesthetic delivery regimens for peripheral nerve catheters: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

There are numerous possible techniques for delivering local anaesthetic through peripheral nerve catheters. These include continuous infusions, patient-controlled boluses and programmed intermittent boluses. The optimal delivery regimen of local anaesthetic is yet to be conclusively established. In this review, we identified prospective trials of delivery regimens through peripheral nerve catheters. Our primary outcome was visual analogue scale scores for pain at 48 h. Secondary outcomes were: visual analogue scores at 24 h; patient satisfaction scores; rescue opioid use; local anaesthetic consumption; and nausea and vomiting. Network meta-analysis was used to compare these outcomes. Predefined sub-group analyses were performed. Thirty-three studies enrolling 1934 participants were included. In comparison with continuous infusion, programmed intermittent boluses improved visual analogue pain scores at both 48 and 24 h, the weighted mean difference (95%CI) being -0.63 (-1.12 to -0.14), p = 0.012 and -0.48 (-0.92 to -0.03), p = 0.034, respectively. Programmed intermittent boluses also improved satisfaction scores, the weighted mean difference (95%CI) being 0.70 (0.10-1.31), p = 0.023, and reduced rescue opioid use, the weighted mean difference (95%CI) in oral morphine equivalent at 24 h being -23.84 mg (-43.90 mg to -3.77 mg), p = 0.020. Sub-group analysis revealed that these findings were mostly confined to lower limb and truncal catheter studies; there were few studies of programmed intermittent boluses for upper limb catheters. Programmed intermittent boluses may provide optimal delivery of a local anaesthetic through peripheral nerve catheters. Further research is warranted, particularly to delineate the differences between upper and lower limb catheter locations, which will help clarify the clinical relevance of these findings.

Determination of the median effective dose (ED50) of bupivacaine and ropivacaine unilateral spinal anesthesia : Prospective, double blinded, randomized dose-response trial

BACKGROUND

Unilateral spinal anesthesia (USpA) has been reported to potentiate spinal anaesthesia and is used in geriatric patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the median effective dose (ED₅₀) of 0.5% hypobaric bupivacaine and 0.5% hypobaric ropivacaine USpA for geriatric patients (age ≥ 70 years) undergoing elective hip replacement surgery.

METHODS

A total of 60 geriatric patients (age ≥ 70 years) undergoing elective hip replacement surgery were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized into 2 groups to receive either intrathecal 0.5% hypobaric bupivacaine USpA (group B) or 0.5% hypobaric ropivacaine USpA (group R). Effective anesthesia was defined as a T10 sensory blockade level maintained for more than 60 min, and a Bromage score of 3 on the operation side within 10 min after injection with no additional epidural anesthetic required during surgery. The ED₅₀ of 0.5% hypobaric bupivacaine and 0.5% hypobaric ropivacaine was calculated using the Dixon and Massey formula.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of demographic data. The ED₅₀ of 0.5% hypobaric bupivacaine USpA was 4.66 mg (95% confidence interval CI 4.69-4.63 mg) mg and that of 0.5% hypobaric ropivacaine USpA was 6.43 mg (95% CI 6.47-6.39 mg) for geriatric patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.

CONCLUSION

We find the ED₅₀ were lower, and the ED50 of 0.5% hypobaric bupivacaine and ropivacaine was 4.66 mg (95% CI 4.69-4.63 mg) and 6.43 mg (95% CI 6.47-6.39 mg), respectively, for USpA in geriatric patients (age ≥ 70 years) undergoing elective hip replacement surgery.

Fluoroscopically Guided Epidural Injections of the Cervical and Lumbar Spine

Advances in imaging and the development of injection techniques have enabled spinal intervention to become an important tool in managing chronic spinal pain. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is one of the most widely used spinal interventions; it directly delivers drugs into the epidural space to relieve pain originating from degenerative spine disorders-central canal stenoses and neural foraminal stenoses-or disk herniations. Knowledge of the normal anatomy of the epidural space is essential to perform an effective and safe ESI and to recognize possible complications. Although computed tomographic (CT) or combined CT-fluoroscopic guidance has been increasingly used in ESI, conventional fluoroscopic guidance is generally performed. In ESI, drugs are delivered into the epidural space by interlaminar or transforaminal routes in the cervical spine or by interlaminar, transforaminal, or caudal routes in the lumbar spine. Epidurography is usually performed before drug delivery to verify the proper position of the needle in the epidural space. A small amount of contrast agent is injected with fluoroscopic guidance. Familiarity with the findings on a typical "true" epidurogram (demonstrating correct needle placement in the epidural space) permits proper performance of ESI. Findings on "false" epidurograms (demonstrating incorrect needle placement) include muscular staining and evidence of intravascular injection, inadvertent facet joint injection, dural puncture, subdural injection, and intraneural or intradiscal injection. ^©RSNA, 2016 An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on December 22, 2016.

Determination of the median effective dose (ED50) of spinal plain ropivacaine for motor block in adults

BACKGROUND

The median effective dose (ED50) for motor blockade of spinal plain bupivacaine in adults was previously reported; however, that of ropivacaine is unknown. This study aimed to determine the ED50 for motor blockade of spinal plain ropivacaine in adults, evaluating the effect of age on this parameter.

METHODS

133 patients in need of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this sequential allocation study. They were divided into 6 groups according to age: 20-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, and 71-80 years. Using the up-and-down method of Dixon, the ropivacaine dose was varied according to the preceding patient's reaction. The modified Bromage and hip motor function score was used to evaluate the degree of motor block after administration of ropivacaine. ED50 values were estimated by the method of Dixon and Massey. Other indexes, including the onset of motor block, the analgesia level, and the duration of motor block were also assessed.

RESULTS

the ED50 for motor block of intrathecal ropivacaine was 20.96 mg (95 % CI: 19.83-22.16 mg) in 20-30, 19.05 mg (95 % CI: 18.43-19.70 mg) in 31-40, 17.91 mg (95 % CI: 17.10-18.76 mg) in 41-50, 17.91 mg (95 % CI: 16.49-19.44 mg) in 51-60, 16.11 mg (95 % CI: 14.50-17.90 mg) in 61-70, and 15.75 mg (95 % CI: 13.98-17.73 mg) in 71-80 year-old patients. Maximum cephalic analgesic effects were obtained at the L4-T6 and L4-T2 levels, at 5 and 10 min, respectively, after intrathecal administration of ropivacaine in all groups.

CONCLUSION

the ED50 for motor block in spinal plain ropivacaine decreases with advancing age, indicating that age has an influence on the potency of spinal ropivacaine.

The Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Adult Patients: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block have examined a maximum of 12 articles, including fewer than 650 participants, and have not examined the effect of ultrasound-guided techniques specifically. Recently, many trials that use ultrasound approaches to TAP block have been published, which report conflicting analgesic results. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided TAP blocks exclusively for all types of abdominal surgeries in adult patients.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. The primary outcome was cumulative IV morphine consumption at 6 hours postoperatively, analyzed according to the type of surgery, the type of surgical anesthesia, the timing of injection, the block approach adopted, and the presence of postoperative multimodal analgesia. Secondary outcomes included IV morphine consumption at 24 hours postoperatively; pain scores at rest and on movement at 6 and 24 hours postoperatively; and postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and rates of complications.

RESULTS

Thirty-one controlled trials including 1611 adult participants were identified. Independent of the type of surgery (abdominal laparotomy, abdominal laparoscopy, and cesarean delivery) but not independent of the type of surgical anesthesia (general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia with or without intrathecal long-acting opioid), ultrasound-guided TAP block reduced IV morphine consumption at 6 hours postoperatively by a mean difference of 6 mg (95% confidence interval [CI], -7 to -4 mg; I2 = 94%; P < 0.00001). The magnitude of the reduction in morphine consumption at 6 hours postoperatively was not influenced by the timing of injection (I2 = 0%; P = 0.72), the block approach adopted (I2 = 0%; P = 0.72), or the presence of postoperative multimodal analgesia (I2 = 73%; P = 0.05). This difference persisted at 24 hours postoperatively (mean difference, -11 mg; 95% CI, -14 to -8 mg; I2 = 99%; P < 0.00001). Pain scores at rest and on movement were reduced at 6 hours postoperatively (mean difference at rest, -10; 95% CI, -15 to -5; I2 = 92%; P = 0.0002; mean difference on movement, -9; 95% CI, -14 to -5; I2 = 58%; P < 0.00001). There were neither differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (I2 = 1%; P = 0.59) nor in the pruritus (I2 = 12%; P = 0.58) Two minor complications (1 bruise and 1 anaphylactoid reaction) were reported in 1028 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided TAP block provides marginal postoperative analgesic efficacy after abdominal laparotomy or laparoscopy and cesarean delivery. However, it does not provide additional analgesic effect in patients who also received spinal anesthesia containing a long-acting opioid. The minimal analgesic efficacy is independent of the timing of injection, the approach adopted, or the presence of postoperative multimodal analgesia. Because of heterogeneity of the results, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Update on the clinical utility and practical use of ropivacaine in Chinese patients

We reviewed the Chinese and English literature for efficacy and tolerability data as well as pharmacological properties of ropivacaine in Chinese patients. Ropivacaine is a long-acting amide local anesthetic agent that elicits nerve block via reversible inhibition of sodium ion influx in nerve fibers. The available evidence in the literature on anesthesia practice indicates that ropivacaine produces equally surgical sensory block and postoperative and obstetrics analgesia with good maternal and fetal outcome to those of bupivacaine or levobupivacaine. It appears to be associated with comparable onset, quality, and duration of sensory block, but with a lower incidence or grade of motor block, compared to bupivacaine. The satisfaction of both patients and surgeons is high when ropivacaine is used. Thus, ropivacaine appears to be an important option for regional anesthesia and for the management of postoperative and labor pain, with its enhanced sensorimotor differentiation blockage at lower concentrations and enhanced safety at higher concentrations.

Clinical characteristics of spinal levobupivacaine: hyperbaric compared with isobaric solution

We performed a prospective, double-blinded study in 20 patients undergoing gynecologic surgery with lower abdominal incision, to investigate characteristics of intrathecal hyperbaric levobupivacaine compared with isobaric levobupivacaine. We randomly assigned them to receive 3 mL of either isobaric or hyperbaric 0.42% levobupivacaine intrathecally. We found that hyperbaric levobupivacaine, compared with isobaric levobupivacaine, spread faster to T10 level (2.8 ± 1.1 versus 6.6 ± 4.7 minutes, P = 0.039), reached higher sensory block levels at 5 and 15 minutes after injection (T8 versus L1, P = 0.011, and T4 versus T7, P = 0.027, resp.), and had a higher peak level (T4 versus T8, P = 0.040). Isobaric levobupivacaine caused a wider range of peak levels (L1 to C8) compared with hyperbaric form (T7 to T2). The level of T4 or higher reached 90% in the hyperbaric group compared with 20% in the isobaric group (P = 0.005). Our results suggest that hyperbaric levobupivacaine was more predictable for sensory block level and more effective for surgical procedures with lower abdominal approach. Hyperbaric levobupivacaine seems to be suitable, but the optimal dosage needs further investigation.

Intravenous lipid emulsion - rescued at LAST

The accidental overdose of local anaesthetics may prove fatal. The commonly used amide local anaesthetics have varying adverse effects on the myocardium and beyond a certain dose all are capable of causing death. Local anaesthetics are the most frequently used drugs in dentistry and although uncommon, local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) accounts for a high proportion of mortalities in the dental office, with local anaesthetic-induced cardiac arrest particularly resistant to standard resuscitation methods. Over the last decade there has been convincing evidence of using intravenous lipid emulsions as a rescue in local anaesthetic - cardiotoxicity and anaesthetic organisations over the globe have developed guidelines on the use of this drug. Despite this, however, awareness among practitioners appears to be lacking. All who use local anaesthetics in their practice should have an appreciation of patients at high risk of toxicity, early symptoms and signs of toxicity, preventative measures when using these drugs and the initial management of systemic toxicity with intravenous lipid emulsion. In this review we intend to discuss the pharmacology and pathophysiology of local anaesthetic toxicity, and the rationale for intravenous lipid emulsion therapy.

Lipid emulsion for local anesthetic systemic toxicity

The accidental overdose of local anesthetics may prove fatal. The commonly used amide local anesthetics have varying adverse effects on the myocardium, and beyond a certain dose all are capable of causing death. Local anesthetics are the most frequently used drugs amongst anesthetists and although uncommon, local anaesthetic systemic toxicity accounts for a high proportion of mortality, with local anaesthetic-induced cardiac arrest particularly resistant to standard resuscitation methods. Over the last decade, there has been convincing evidence of intravenous lipid emulsions as a rescue in local anesthetic-cardiotoxicity, and anesthetic organisations, over the globe have developed guidelines on the use of this drug. Despite this, awareness amongst practitioners appears to be lacking. All who use local anesthetics in their practice should have an appreciation of patients at high risk of toxicity, early symptoms and signs of toxicity, preventative measures when using local anesthetics, and the initial management of systemic toxicity with intravenous lipid emulsion. In this paper we intend to discuss the pharmacology and pathophysiology of local anesthetics and toxicity, and the rationale for lipid emulsion therapy.

Comparison of intrathecal bupivacaine and ropivacaine with different doses of sufentanil

BACKGROUND

Spinal bupivacaine produces a complete anaesthetic block of a longer duration than ropivacaine, which leads to a potentially increased risk of failure. A combination of sufentanil to ropivacaine may improve the block's reliability.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients, scheduled for varicose vein stripping or the tension-free vaginal tape procedure, were allocated to receive double-blindly, spinal bupivacaine 10 mg (Group 1) or ropivacaine 10 mg without (Group 2) or with sufentanil 2.5 mcg (Group 3), 5 mcg (Group 4). Sensory block was tested with pinprick and motor block was evaluated with the Bromage scale until full recovery. The primary endpoint was to compare the duration of sensory block evaluated by regression to S2.

RESULTS

In comparison with bupivacaine, ropivacaine produced a shorter duration sensory block (median at 68, 90 and 120 min in groups 2, 3 and 4, respectively, vs. 150 min in Group 1) and motor block (median at 90, 98 and 120 min in groups 2, 3 and 4 vs. 180 min in Group 1). Motor blockade was significantly less important in patients receiving spinal ropivacaine (median values for the Bromage scale at 3 in groups 2, 3 and 4, vs. 1 in Group 1). Pruritus was significantly more frequent in patients receiving spinal sufentanil (Groups 3 and 4 vs. Groups 1 and 2).

CONCLUSION

Plain bupivacaine 10 mg has a longer recovery profile than the same dose of ropivacaine with or without sufentanil.