Transforaminal 5% phenol neurolysis for the treatment of intractable cancer pain

Pain Intervention for Cancer and Non-cancer Pain: A Retrospective Analysis of Tertiary Care Hospital Experience

Background

With the recent advancement in medicine there has been a great emphasis on the management of chronic pain which remains as one of the major contributing factors for functional limitation in patients as well as a financial burden on healthcare. Newer treatment modalities are aimed at terminating the vicious pain cycles and in this regard peripheral nerve blocks have proven to be very effective.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for both cancer and non-cancer patients by objective assessment of the patients before and after the procedure.

Materials and methods

The study included 252 patients who underwent nerve block procedures in Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital from December 2016 to December 2018. The patients were evaluated using numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, reduction in analgesic doses and patient satisfaction after one and four weeks post procedure. The data was analyzed using mean values and calculating percentages.

Results

In cancer group, 168 patients were included; mean age 50.49 ± 15.39 with 46.43% females and 53.57% males, the average pain score was 2.62 ± 1.87 post procedure compared with 6.30 ± 1.87 post procedure. 48.21% of the patients reported a reduction in analgesia while 51.79% of the patients kept on using the same analgesics doses. 74.40% of the patients were satisfied and 25.60% patients remained unsatisfied after one week whereas 66.07% were satisfied, 23.81% were not satisfied and 10.12% loss to follow up after four weeks. In non-cancer group 84 patients were included; mean age 56.49 ± 15.79 with 41.67% females and 58.33% males, the average pain score before intervention was 5.99 ± 1.21 and after intervention it was 2.43 ± 1.62. In 73.81% non-cancer patients the analgesics doses were reduced and 70.24% patients were satisfied while 29.76% were unsatisfied after one week. After four weeks 55.95% were satisfied, 22.62% were not satisfied and 21.43% loss to follow up.

Conclusion

The study showed decrease in pain scores in both group of patients and the importance of nerve blocks as an effective method for chronic pain management. The reduction in the use of other analgesics was also commendable in both the groups.

Indian Society for Study of Pain, Cancer Pain Special Interest Group Guidelines on Interventional Management for Cancer Pain

The Indian Society for Study of Pain (ISSP), Cancer Pain Special Interest Group guidelines on interventional management for cancer pain in adults provide a structured, stepwise approach which will help to improve the management of cancer pain and to provide the patients with minimally acceptable quality of life. The guidelines have been developed based on the available literature and evidence, to suit the needs, patient population, and situations in India. A questionnaire based on the key elements of each sub draft addressing certain inconclusive areas where evidence was lacking was made available on the ISSP website and circulated by e-mail to all the ISSP and Indian Association of Palliative Care members. We recommend using interventional management when conventional therapy fails to offer adequate benefits or causes undesirable side effects. Vertebroplasty should be offered to patients with uncontrolled bone pain when expertise is available.

New Cancer Pain Treatment Options

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer pain is often incapacitating and discouraging to patients; is demoralizing to family members and care takers; and is taxing and difficult to subdue for the pain specialists. The consequences of implementing suboptimal treatment are far-reaching; therefore, effective treatment methods are in a great demand. The face of cancer pain management has changed in considerable ways, and interventional procedures have become an integral part of providing multimodal analgesia in cancer pain treatment. The goals of this review are to draw attention to the critical role that regional anesthetic nerve blocks and interventional pain management techniques play in treating malignancy-related pain and emphasize the benefits provided by the aforementioned treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large proportion of cancer patients continues to struggle with an inadequately treated pain despite a strict adherence to the WHO analgesic step ladder. The previous pain treatment algorithm has been modified to include peripheral neural blockade, neuro-destructive techniques, neuromodulatory device use, and intrathecal drug delivery systems. The accumulated evidence highlights the opioid-sparing qualities and other benefits afforded by these modalities: decreasing medication-induced side effects, reducing economic burden of poor analgesia, and overall improvement in quality of life of the patients afflicted with a painful neoplastic disease. The rising prevalence of cancer-related pain syndromes is paralleled by an unmatched growth of innovative treatment strategies. Modified WHO analgesic ladder represents one of the greatest paradigm shifts within the domain of oncologic pain treatment. The cancer patient population requires a prompt and liberal, albeit judicious, delivery of unorthodox pain treatment options freed from the rigid bonds of conventional guidelines and standard practices.

Interventional Treatments of Cancer Pain

Pain is a significant burden for patients with cancer and is particularly prevalent among those with advanced cancer. Appropriate interventional cancer pain therapies complement conventional pain management by reducing the need for systemic opioid therapy and its associated toxicity; however, these therapies are often underutilized. This article reviews techniques, indications, complications, and outcomes of the most common interventional approaches for the management of cancer-related pain. These approaches include intrathecal drug delivery, vertebral augmentation, neurolysis of the celiac, superior hypogastric and ganglion impar plexus', image-guided tumor ablation, and other less commonly performed but potentially beneficial interventions.

Percutaneous dorsal root ganglion lysis with phenol for the treatment of pain associated with thoracic compression fracture

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic thoracic compression fracture is one of the most common causes of back pain in elderly. Although vertebroplasty is widely utilized in patients when conservative treatment fails, we introduced an alternative percutaneous technique for the treatment of thoracic compression pain.

METHODS

This in a retrospective study. The analysis was performed on 28 consecutive patients who underwent undergoing percutaneous dorsal root ganglion lysis with phenol for the treatment of pain associated with thoracic compression fracture. An acceptable treatment outcome was operationally defined as a pain intensity numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 3 or lower or EQ-5D index of 0.672 or higher. The primary outcome was pain relief and acceptable treatment outcome at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year.

RESULTS

Of the 28 cases treated with our procedures, the change in mean NRS score between baseline and one day was -2.5 (95 % CI -1.6 ~ -3.4, p < 0.001), between baseline and one week was -4.7 (-4.1 to -5.3, p < 0.001), between baseline and one month was -5.8 (-5.2 to -6.5, p < 0.001), and between baseline and one year was -6.3 (-5.6 to -7.1, p < 0.001). An acceptable treatment outcome was 14 % one day after the procedure, 46 % at one week, 72 % at one month, and 84 % at one year. Complication rate was 3.6 %.

CONCLUSIONS

For thoracic compression fracture patients, percutaneous dorsal root ganglion lysis with phenol is an effective, and safe alternative treatment method worth considering. Pain relief is fast and persists for one year.

The role of chemical neurolysis in cancer pain

Pain continues to be a significant symptom burden in cancer patients, with prevalence in 53% of patients at all stages of cancer and as high as 58% to 69% in those with advanced cancer. Neurolytic blocks are a mainstay in the armamentarium of cancer pain management, more so in intractable pain from advanced cancer. There is no clear consensus on patient selection, technique, or timing of these blocks. Here we discuss the use of various neurolytic blocks for cancer pain and detail some of the recent literature and our experience.