The Successful Management of Severe Protamine-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension Using Inhaled Prostacyclin

Perioperative right ventricular function and dysfunction in adult cardiac surgery-focused review (part 2-management of right ventricular failure)

The single most important factor in improving outcomes in right ventricular (RV) failure is anticipating and recognizing it. Once established, a vicious circle of systemic hypotension, and RV ischemia and dilation, occurs, leading to cardiogenic shock, multi-organ failure, and death. RV dysfunction and failure theoretically can occur in three settings-increase in the pre-load; increase in after load; and decrease in contractility. For patients deemed low risk for the development of RV failure, when it occurs, the correction of underlying cause is the most important and effective treatment strategy. Therapy of RV failure must focus on improving the RV coronary perfusion, lowering pulmonary vascular resistance, and optimizing the pre-load. Pre-load and after-load optimization, ventilator adjustments, and improving the contractility of RV by inotropes are the first line of therapy and should be initiated early to prevent multi-organ damage. Mechanical assist device implantation or circulatory support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be needed in refractory cases.

Use of epoprostenol to treat severe pulmonary vasoconstriction induced by protamine in cardiac surgery

Since there were a few articles to report the treatment of severe pulmonary vasoconstriction induced by protamine in cardiac surgery, we described the use of epoprostenol to reverse this condition.A total of 5 cases of severe pulmonary vasoconstriction induced by protamine in cardiac surgery were reviewed. The demographic, clinical data and treatment process were obtained. All the patients were followed up.Severe pulmonary vasoconstriction was occurred 4 to 10 minutes after protamine infusion. The primary sign was sudden hypotension, the pulmonary artery pressure was increased gradually, the arterial oxygen partial pressure was decreased in all the patients. Epoprostenol was infused via pulmonary artery catheter at dosage of 20 to 40 ng/kg·min in all the patients, 2 patients were underwent re-cardiac pulmonary bypass assistance. The hemodynamic instability status lasted 40 to 65 minutes respectively. All the patients were recovered uneventfully.All physicians should alert to the incidence of severe pulmonary vasoconstriction induced by protamine in cardiac surgery. Use epoprostenol through pulmonary artery catheter could treat pulmonary artery vasoconstriction effectively and safely.

Drug-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

While pulmonary arterial hypertension remains an uncommon diagnosis, various therapeutic agents are recognized as important associations. These agents are typically categorized into "definite", "likely", "possible", or "unlikely" to cause pulmonary arterial hypertension, based on the strength of evidence.

OBJECTIVE

This review will focus on those therapeutic agents where there is sufficient literature to adequately comment on the role of the agent in the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed covering the period September 1970- 2017. The search term utilized was "drug induced pulmonary hypertension". This resulted in the identification of 853 peer-reviewed articles including case reports. Each paper was then reviewed by the authors for its relevance. The majority of these papers (599) were excluded as they related to systemic hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, human immunodeficiency virus, pulmonary fibrosis, alternate differential diagnosis, treatment, basic science, adverse effects of treatment, and pulmonary hypertension secondary to pulmonary embolism. Agents affecting serotonin metabolism (and related anorexigens): Anorexigens, such as aminorex, fenfluramine, benfluorex, phenylpropanolamine, and dexfenfluramine were the first class of medications recognized to cause pulmonary arterial hypertension. Although most of these medications have now been withdrawn worldwide, they remain important not only from a historical perspective, but because their impact on serotonin metabolism remains relevant. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tryptophan, and lithium, which affect serotonin metabolism, have also been implicated in the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Interferon and related medications: Interferon alfa and sofosbuvir have been linked to the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with other risk factors, such as human immunodeficiency virus co-infection. Antiviral therapies: Sofosbuvir has been associated with two cases of pulmonary artery hypertension in patients with multiple risk factors for its development. Its role in pathogenesis remains unclear. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent a relatively new class of medications. Of these dasatinib has the strongest evidence in drug-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension, considered a recognized cause. Nilotinib, ponatinib, carfilzomib, and ruxolitinib are newer agents, which paradoxically have been linked to both cause and treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Monoclonal antibodies and immune regulating medications: Several case reports have linked some monoclonal antibodies and immune modulating therapies to pulmonary arterial hypertension. There are no large series documenting an increased prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension complicating these agents; nonetheless, trastuzumab emtansine, rituximab, bevacizumab, cyclosporine, and leflunomide have all been implicated in case reports. Opioids and substances of abuse: Buprenorphine and cocaine have been identified as potential causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The mechanism by which this occurs is unclear. Tramadol has been demonstrated to cause severe, transient, and reversible pulmonary hypertension. Chemotherapeutic agents: Alkylating and alkylating-like agents, such as bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and mitomycin have increased the risk of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, which may be clinically indistinct from pulmonary arterial hypertension. Thalidomide and paclitaxel have also been implicated as potential causes. Miscellaneous medications: Protamine appears to be able to cause acute, reversible pulmonary hypertension when bound to heparin. Amiodarone is also capable of causing pulmonary hypertension by way of recognized side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary arterial hypertension remains a rare diagnosis, with drug-induced causes even more uncommon, accounting for only 10.5% of cases in large registry series. Despite several agents being implicated in the development of PAH, the supportive evidence is typically limited, based on case series and observational data. Furthermore, even in the drugs with relatively strong associations, factors that predispose an individual to PAH have yet to be elucidated.

Fatal right ventricular failure and pulmonary hypertension after protamine administration during cardiac transplantation

Protamine sulfate is the only Food and Drug administration approved medication for reversal of intraoperative heparin-induced anticoagulation during cardiac and vascular surgeries. One of the rare side effects of protamine sulfate is an idiosyncratic reaction resulting in acute pulmonary hypertension (APH) and right ventricular (RV) failure occurring after protamine administration. These reactions are rare but catastrophic with high mortality. A 36-year-old female with severe congestive heart failure was undergoing cardiac transplant surgery. After successful implantation of the donor heart, the patient was weaned off cardiopulmonary bypass. Protamine was then administered to reverse the heparin anticoagulation. She immediately developed APH and RV failure immediately after protamine infusion. The patient required immediate administration of inotropic agents, nitric oxide (NO), and subsequently required a number of mechanical support devices including an RV assist device (RVAD) and ultimately full veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Despite heroic efforts, the patient developed refractory multi-organ failure in the Intensive Care Unit and died after family requested discontinuation of resuscitative efforts. This case probably represents the first reported occurrence of fatal protamine-induced APH and ventricular failure in the setting of cardiac transplantation surgery. A number of interventions including inhaled NO, systemic vasopressors, RVAD, and ultimately VA-ECMO failed to reverse the situation, and the patient died of multi-organ failure.

Efficacy of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in a case of protamine shock during transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Here, we report the case of a patient who developed protamine shock during a transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI) procedure, which was diagnosed by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). A 77-year-old man with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular (LV) function underwent TAVI under general anesthesia. During the procedure, a transcatheter heart valve (THV) was deployed via the transfemoral approach, without any other major complications. The entire device system was then removed, and protamine sulfate was administered intravenously in 2 min.

Two minutes after the protamine administration, severe hypotension occurred. TEE did not reveal THV malfunction or any other major complications. However, comparison of the TEE image obtained before protamine administration and that obtained 2 min after protamine administration showed right ventricular (RV) dilatation, RV free wall motion abnormality, and LV volume reduction, without any electrocardiographic changes. We diagnosed this as protamine shock and bolus infusions of phenylephrine and norepinephrine were administered, and chest compressions were initiated immediately. After 1 min, hypotension as well as the right and left ventricular size and dysfunction immediately reverted to baseline. The severe systemic hypotension resolved as well. Thereafter, he recovered from anesthesia without other complications.

This case showed the clinical features of protamine shock with acute pulmonary hypertension. The TEE images, in this case, should be a reminder for all doctors who perform intraoperative TEE for patient monitoring when they perform procedures to treat structural heart diseases.

Protamine Administration Via the Ascending Aorta May Prevent Cardiopulmonary Instability

OBJECTIVE

The method of protamine administration may influence adverse reactions. The authors investigated the effects of 3 different methods of protamine administration on cardiopulmonary function.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical study.

SETTING

Single university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Human volunteer patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Ninety-five patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized prospectively into 3 groups. Group central vein control (CVC) and group central vein (CV) received protamine via a central vein over 10 minutes and 2 minutes, respectively. Group ascending aorta (AA) received protamine via the ascending aorta over 2 minutes. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed at 7 intraoperative time points, and pulmonary parameters were assessed at 4 intraoperative time points.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The groups were similar regarding preoperative demographics, intraoperative care, and baseline cardiopulmonary function. However, both the CVC and CV groups exhibited decreased blood pressure and impaired pulmonary oxygenation after protamine administration; these changes were not observed in the AA group. Within-group changes in mean arterial blood pressure after protamine administration were significant in the AA group (mean increase 6.5 mmHg; p = 0.01) but not in the CVC (mean decrease 3.1 mmHg, p = 0.13) or CV (mean decrease 4.3 mmHg, p = 0.14) groups. Within-group changes in arterial oxygenation after protamine administration were significant in the CVC (mean decrease 85 mmHg; p<0.001) and CV (mean decrease 47 mmHg; p = 0.009) groups but not in the AA group (mean decrease 8 mmHg; p = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that administration of protamine via the ascending aorta may be the preferred route. The potential ability of administering protamine via the ascending aorta to prevent cardiopulmonary instability in patients undergoing cardiac surgery deserves further clinical investigation.

Brief intraoperative heparinization and blood loss in anterior lumbar spine surgery

OBJECT

The anterior approach to the lumbar spine may be associated with iliac artery thrombosis. Intraoperative heparin can be administered to prevent thrombosis; however, there is a concern that this will increase the procedural blood loss. The aim of this study was to examine whether intraoperative heparin can be administered without increasing blood loss in anterior lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

A prospective study of consecutive anterior approaches for lumbar spine surgery was performed between January 2009 and June 2014 by a single vascular surgeon and a single spine surgeon. Patients underwent an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L4-5 and/or L5-S1, a total disc replacement (TDR) at L4-5 and/or L5-S1, or a hybrid procedure with a TDR at L4-5 and an ALIF at L5-S1. Heparin was administered intravenously when arterial flow to the lower limbs was interrupted during the procedure. Heparin was usually reversed on removal of the causative retraction.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 188 patients with a mean age of 41.7 years; 96 (51.1%) were male. Eighty-four patients (44.7%) had an ALIF, 57 (30.3%) had a TDR, and 47 (25.0%) had a hybrid operation with a TDR at L4-5 and an ALIF at L5-S1. One hundred thirty-four patients (71.3%) underwent a single-level procedure (26.9% L4-5 and 73.1% L5-S1) and 54 (28.7%) underwent a 2-level procedure (L4-5 and L5-S1). Seventy-two patients (38.3%) received heparinization intraoperatively. Heparin was predominantly administered during hybrid operations (68.1%), 2-level procedures (70.4%), and procedures involving the L4-5 level (80.6%). There were no intraoperative ischemic vascular complications reported in this series. There was 1 postoperative deep venous thrombosis. The overall mean estimated blood loss (EBL) for the heparin group (389.7 ml) was significantly higher than for the nonheparin group (160.5 ml) (p < 0.0001). However, when all variables were analyzed with multiple linear regression, only the prosthesis used and level treated were found to be significant in blood loss (p < 0.05). The highest blood loss occurred in hybrid procedures (448.1 ml), followed by TDR (302.5 ml) and ALIF (99.7 ml). There were statistically significant differences between the EBL during ALIF compared with TDR and hybrid (p < 0.0001), but not between TDR and hybrid. The L4-5 level was associated with significantly higher blood loss (384.9 ml) compared with L5-S1 (111.4 ml) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

During an anterior exposure for lumbar spine surgery, the administration of heparin does not significantly increase blood loss. The prosthesis used and level treated were found to significantly increase blood loss, with TDR and the L4-5 level having greater blood loss compared with ALIF and L5-S1, respectively. Heparin can be administered safely to help prevent thrombotic intraoperative vascular complications without increasing blood loss.

Perioperative management of pulmonary hypertension during lung transplantation (a lesson for other anaesthesia settings)

Patients with pulmonary hypertension are some of the most challenging for an anaesthesiologist to manage. Pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing surgical procedures is associated with high morbidity and mortality due to right ventricular failure, arrhythmias and ischaemia leading to haemodynamic instability. Lung transplantation is the only therapeutic option for end-stage lung disease. Patients undergoing lung transplantation present a variety of challenges for anaesthesia team, but pulmonary hypertension remains the most important. The purpose of this article is to review the anaesthetic management of pulmonary hypertension during lung transplantation, with particular emphasis on the choice of anaesthesia, pulmonary vasodilator therapy, inotropic and vasopressor therapy, and the most recent intraoperative monitoring recommendations to optimize patient care.

Clinical review: management of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass after cardiac surgery

A sizable number of cardiac surgical patients are difficult to wean off cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) as a result of structural or functional cardiac abnormalities, vasoplegic syndrome, or ventricular dysfunction. In these cases, therapeutic decisions have to be taken quickly for successful separation from CPB. Various crisis management scenarios can be anticipated which emphasizes the importance of basic knowledge in applied cardiovascular physiology, knowledge of pathophysiology of the surgical lesions as well as leadership, and communication between multiple team members in a high-stakes environment. Since the mid-90s, transoesophageal echocardiography has provided an opportunity to assess the completeness of surgery, to identify abnormal circulatory conditions, and to guide specific medical and surgical interventions. However, because of the lack of evidence-based guidelines, there is a large variability regarding the use of cardiovascular drugs and mechanical circulatory support at the time of weaning from the CPB. This review presents key features for risk stratification and risk modulation as well as a standardized physiological approach to achieve successful weaning from CPB.