1
|
Zhou J, Yim W, Zhou J, Jin Z, Xu M, Mantri Y, He T, Cheng Y, Fu L, Wu Z, Hancock T, Penny W, Jokerst JV. A fiber optic photoacoustic sensor for real-time heparin monitoring. Biosens Bioelectron 2022; 196:113692. [PMID: 34653712 PMCID: PMC9119340 DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Heparin is a common anticoagulant, but heparin overdose is a common intensive care unit (ICU) medication error due to the narrow therapeutic window of heparin. Conventional methods to monitoring heparin suffer from long turnaround time, the need for skilled personnel, and low frequency of sampling. To overcome these issues, we describe here a fiber optic photoacoustic (PA) sensor for real-time heparin monitoring. The proposed sensor was validated with in vitro testing and in a simulated in vivo model using the following samples: (1) phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), (2) spiked human plasma, (3) spiked whole human blood, and (4) clinical samples from patients treated with heparin. Samples were validated by comparing the PA signal to the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) as well as the activated clotting time (ACT). Importantly, the proposed sensor has a short turnaround time (3 min) and a limit of detection of 0.18 U/ml in whole human blood. The PA signal is linear with heparin dose and correlates with the aPTT value (Pearson's r = 0.99). The PA signal from 32 clinical samples collected from eight patients linearly correlated with ACT values (Pearson's r = 0.89, in vitro; Pearson's r = 0.93, simulated in vivo). The PA signal was also validated against the cumulative heparin dose (Pearson's r = 0.94, in vitro; Pearson's r = 0.96, simulated in vivo). This approach could have applications in both in vitro and real-time in vivo heparin monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingcheng Zhou
- Department of NanoEngineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Wonjun Yim
- Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Jiajing Zhou
- Department of NanoEngineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Zhicheng Jin
- Department of NanoEngineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Ming Xu
- Department of NanoEngineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Yash Mantri
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Tengyu He
- Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Yong Cheng
- Department of NanoEngineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Lei Fu
- Department of NanoEngineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Zhuohong Wu
- Department of NanoEngineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Tiffany Hancock
- Division of Cardiology, VA Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, 92161, USA
| | - William Penny
- Division of Cardiology, VA Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, 92161, USA
| | - Jesse V. Jokerst
- Department of NanoEngineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA,Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA,Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA,Corresponding author. Department of Nano Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. (J.V. Jokerst)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl and Its Derivatives in Children: A Comprehensive Review. Clin Pharmacokinet 2019; 57:125-149. [PMID: 28688027 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-017-0569-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Fentanyl and its derivatives sufentanil, alfentanil, and remifentanil are potent opioids. A comprehensive review of the use of fentanyl and its derivatives in the pediatric population was performed using the National Library of Medicine PubMed. Studies were included if they contained original pharmacokinetic parameters or models using established routes of administration in patients younger than 18 years of age. Of 372 retrieved articles, 44 eligible pharmacokinetic studies contained data of 821 patients younger than 18 years of age, including more than 46 preterm infants, 64 full-term neonates, 115 infants/toddlers, 188 children, and 28 adolescents. Underlying diagnoses included congenital heart and pulmonary disease and abdominal disorders. Routes of drug administration were intravenous, epidural, oral-transmucosal, intranasal, and transdermal. Despite extensive use in daily clinical practice, few studies have been performed. Preterm and term infants have lower clearance and protein binding. Pharmacokinetics was not altered by chronic renal or hepatic disease. Analyses of the pooled individual patients' data revealed that clearance maturation relating to body weight could be best described by the Hill function for sufentanil (R 2 = 0.71, B max 876 mL/min, K 50 16.3 kg) and alfentanil (R 2 = 0.70, B max (fixed) 420 mL/min, K 50 28 kg). The allometric exponent for estimation of clearance of sufentanil was 0.99 and 0.75 for alfentanil clearance. Maturation of remifentanil clearance was described by linear regression to bodyweight (R 2 = 0.69). The allometric exponent for estimation of remifentanil clearance was 0.76. For fentanyl, linear regression showed only a weak correlation between clearance and bodyweight in preterm and term neonates (R 2 = 0.22) owing to a lack of data in older age groups. A large heterogeneity regarding study design, clinical setting, drug administration, laboratory assays, and pharmacokinetic estimation was observed between studies introducing bias into the analyses performed in this review. A limitation of this review is that pharmacokinetic data, based on different modes of administration, dosing schemes, and parameter estimation methods, were combined.
Collapse
|
3
|
Correction to: Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl and Its Derivatives in Children: A Comprehensive Review. Clin Pharmacokinet 2017; 57:393-417. [PMID: 29178007 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-017-0609-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Fentanyl and its derivatives sufentanil, alfentanil, and remifentanil are potent opioids. A comprehensive review of the use of fentanyl and its derivatives in the pediatric population was performed using the National Library of Medicine PubMed. Studies were included if they contained original pharmacokinetic parameters or models using established routes of administration in patients younger than 18 years of age. Of 372 retrieved articles, 44 eligible pharmacokinetic studies contained data of 821 patients younger than 18 years of age, including more than 46 preterm infants, 64 full-term neonates, 115 infants/toddlers, 188 children, and 28 adolescents. Underlying diagnoses included congenital heart and pulmonary disease and abdominal disorders. Routes of drug administration were intravenous, epidural, oral-transmucosal, intranasal, and transdermal. Despite extensive use in daily clinical practice, few studies have been performed. Preterm and term infants have lower clearance and protein binding. Pharmacokinetics was not altered by chronic renal or hepatic disease. Analyses of the pooled individual patients' data revealed that clearance maturation relating to body weight could be best described by the Hill function for sufentanil (R 2 = 0.71, B max 876 mL/min, K 50 16.3 kg) and alfentanil (R 2 = 0.70, B max (fixed) 420 mL/min, K 50 28 kg). The allometric exponent for estimation of clearance of sufentanil was 0.99 and 0.75 for alfentanil clearance. Maturation of remifentanil clearance was described by linear regression to bodyweight (R 2 = 0.69). The allometric exponent for estimation of remifentanil clearance was 0.76. For fentanyl, linear regression showed only a weak correlation between clearance and bodyweight in preterm and term neonates (R 2 = 0.22) owing to a lack of data in older age groups. A large heterogeneity regarding study design, clinical setting, drug administration, laboratory assays, and pharmacokinetic estimation was observed between studies introducing bias into the analyses performed in this review. A limitation of this review is that pharmacokinetic data, based on different modes of administration, dosing schemes, and parameter estimation methods, were combined.
Collapse
|
5
|
McCormack SA, Best BM. Obstetric Pharmacokinetic Dosing Studies are Urgently Needed. Front Pediatr 2014; 2:9. [PMID: 24575394 PMCID: PMC3920104 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2014.00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2013] [Accepted: 01/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Use of pharmacotherapy during pregnancy is common and increasing. Physiologic changes during pregnancy may significantly alter the overall systemic drug exposure, necessitating dose changes. A search of PubMed for pharmacokinetic clinical trials showed 494 publications during pregnancy out of 35,921 total pharmacokinetic published studies (1.29%), from the late 1960s through August 31, 2013. Closer examination of pharmacokinetic studies in pregnant women published since 2008 (81 studies) revealed that about a third of the trials were for treatment of acute labor and delivery issues, a third included studies of infectious disease treatment during pregnancy, and the remaining third were for varied ante-partum indications. Approximately, two-thirds of these recent studies were primarily funded by government agencies worldwide, one-quarter were supported by private non-profit foundations or combinations of government and private funding, and slightly <10% were supported by pharmaceutical industry. As highlighted in this review, vast gaps exist in pharmacology information and evidence for appropriate dosing of medications in pregnant women. This lack of knowledge and understanding of drug disposition throughout pregnancy place both the mother and the fetus at risk for avoidable therapeutic misadventures - suboptimal efficacy or excess toxicity - with medication use in pregnancy. Increased efforts to perform and support obstetric dosing and pharmacokinetic studies are greatly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelley A McCormack
- Pediatrics Department, School of Medicine, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, University of California San Diego , San Diego, CA , USA
| | - Brookie M Best
- Pediatrics Department, School of Medicine, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, University of California San Diego , San Diego, CA , USA ; Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brusseau R, Mizrahi-Arnaud A. Fetal anesthesia and pain management for intrauterine therapy. Clin Perinatol 2013; 40:429-42. [PMID: 23972749 DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2013.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Anesthesia provision for fetal intervention differs from most other anesthetic situations insofar as anesthesiologists must care for 2 or more patients-each with potentially conflicting requirements. The first is the mother who can readily indicate discomforts, can be monitored directly, and to whom drugs may be administered directly and easily. For the fetus (or fetuses), nociception must be assumed or inferred indirectly, monitoring is limited at best, and drug administration is complicated and often indirect. Fetal and maternal hemodynamic stability must be assured; and a plan to resuscitate the fetus, should problems occur during the procedure, must be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Brusseau
- Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Fetal surgery pushes the limits of knowledge and therapy beyond conventional paradigms by treating the developing fetus as a patient. Providing anesthesia for fetal surgery is challenging for many reasons. It requires integration of both obstetric and pediatric anesthesia practice. Two patients must be anesthetized for the benefit of one, and there is little margin for error. Many disciplines are involved, and communication must be effective among all of them. Conducting anesthetic research with vulnerable populations, such as the pregnant woman carrying a fetus with a birth defect is difficult, and many questions remain to be answered. Work is needed to study possible neurotoxicity caused by exposure of the developing brain to anesthetic agents. The effects of stress on the developing fetus also must be further delineated. Anesthetic techniques vary by institution, and prospective studies to determine optimal anesthetic regimens are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaina E Lin
- The Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ngamprasertwong P, Vinks AA, Boat A. Update in fetal anesthesia for the ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2012; 50:26-40. [PMID: 23047444 PMCID: PMC3756472 DOI: 10.1097/aia.0b013e31826df966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The ex-utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) is one type of fetal surgery, performed before delivery while the fetus remains attached to the uteroplacental circulation. This intervention improves neonatal morbidity and mortality of certain congenital diseases. For instance, securing the airway of a fetus with congenital airway obstruction while on uteroplacental circulation prevents the hypoxemia during the establishment of an airway post-delivery. Anesthesia for fetal surgery now incorporates new knowledge of the maternal/fetal response to anesthetic agents. This chapter reviews for the EXIT procedure the effects of maternal anesthesia on fetal hemodynamics, intravenous anesthesia to supplement inhalational anesthesia in order to provide maternal-fetal hemodynamic stability during surgery, intraoperative fetal monitoring, maternal pharmacokinetics approach to study placental drug transfer and fetal pharmacokinetics to improve our understanding of the effects of maternal anesthesia on the fetus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pornswan Ngamprasertwong
- Department of Anesthesia, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Alexander A Vinks
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Anne Boat
- Department of Anesthesia, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|