Acute-Onset Quadriparesis After Placement of Thoracic Epidural: A Case Report

Comparison of subcutaneous analgesic system and epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control in open pediatric oncology operations: A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Children undergoing open oncologic surgery can have significant post-operative pain. The purpose of this trial was to compare a surgeon-placed subcutaneous analgesic system (SAS) to epidural analgesia.

METHODS

Single center randomized controlled trial including children ≤18 years undergoing open tumor resection between October 2018 and April 2021. Randomization to SAS or epidural was done preoperatively and perioperative pain management was standardized. Families were blinded to the modality. Comparisons of oral morphine equivalents (OME) and pain scores for three postoperative days, clinical outcome parameters, and parental satisfaction following unblinding were completed using non-parametric analyses.

RESULTS

Of 36 patients (SAS 18, Epidural 18), median age was 5 years (range <1-17). The Epidural cohort had less OME demand on postoperative day one (SAS 0.76 mg/kg, Epidural 0.11 mg/kg; p<0.01) and two (SAS 0.48 mg/kg, Epidural 0.07 mg/kg, p = 0.03). Pain scores were similar on postoperative days 1-3 (0-2 in both groups). The Epidural cohort had more device complications (SAS 11%, Epidural 50%; p = 0.03) and higher urinary catheter use (SAS 50%, Epidural 89%; p = 0.03). More than 80% of parents would use the same device in the future (SAS 100%, Epidural 84%, p = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

For children undergoing open oncologic abdominal or thoracic surgery, early post-operative pain control appears to be better with epidural analgesia; however, SAS has decreased incidence of device complications and urinary catheter use. Parental satisfaction is excellent with both modalities. SAS could be considered as an alternative to epidural, especially in settings when epidural placement is not available or contraindicated.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study, Randomized controlled trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1.

Subcutaneous analgesic system versus epidural for post-operative pain control in surgical pediatric oncology patients

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Pediatric oncology patients often undergo open operations for tumor resection, and epidural catheters are commonly utilized for pain control. Our purpose was to evaluate whether a subcutaneous analgesic system (SAS) provides equivalent post-operative pain control.

METHODS

An IRB approved, retrospective chart review of children age <18 undergoing open abdominal, pelvic or thoracic surgery for tumor resection between 2017 and 2019 who received either epidural or SAS for post-operative pain control was performed. Comparisons of morphine milligram equivalents (MME), pain scores, and post-operative course were made using parametric and non-parametric analyses.

RESULTS

Of 101 patients, median age was 7 years (2 months-17.9 years). There were 65 epidural and 36 SAS patients. Transverse laparotomy was the most common incision (41%), followed by thoracotomy (29%). Pain scores, MME, urinary catheter days, and post-operative length of stay (LOS) were similar between the two groups. Urinary catheter use was more common in epidural patients (70% vs 30%, p = <0.001). SAS patients had faster time to ambulation and time to regular diet by 1 day (p = 0.02). Epidural patients more commonly had a complication with the pain device (20% vs 3%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to be discharged with narcotics (60% vs. 40%, p = 0.04). Charges associated with the hospital stay were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric oncology patients undergoing open abdominal, pelvic, and thoracic surgery, SAS may provide similar pain control to epidural, but with faster post-operative recovery, fewer complications, and less discharge narcotic use. A prospective study is needed to validate these results.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective Comparative LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.