Pain, disability, and psychological functioning in chronic low back pain subgroups: myofascial versus herniated disc syndrome

Classification of patients with low back-related leg pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The identification of clinically relevant subgroups of low back pain (LBP) is considered the number one LBP research priority in primary care. One subgroup of LBP patients are those with back related leg pain. Leg pain frequently accompanies LBP and is associated with increased levels of disability and higher health costs than simple low back pain. Distinguishing between different types of low back-related leg pain (LBLP) is important for clinical management and research applications, but there is currently no clear agreement on how to define and identify LBLP due to nerve root involvement. The aim of this systematic review was to identify, describe and appraise papers that classify or subgroup populations with LBLP, and summarise how leg pain due to nerve root involvement is described and diagnosed in the various systems.

METHODS

The search strategy involved nine electronic databases including Medline and Embase, reference lists of eligible studies and relevant reviews. Selected papers were appraised independently by two reviewers using a standardised scoring tool.

RESULTS

Of 13,358 initial potential eligible citations, 50 relevant papers were identified that reported on 22 classification systems. Papers were grouped according to purpose and criteria of the classification systems. Five themes emerged: (i) clinical features (ii) pathoanatomy (iii) treatment-based approach (iv) screening tools and prediction rules and (v) pain mechanisms. Three of the twenty two systems focused specifically on LBLP populations. Systems that scored highest following quality appraisal were ones where authors generally included statistical methods to develop their classifications, and supporting work had been published on the systems' validity, reliability and generalisability. There was lack of consistency in how LBLP due to nerve root involvement was described and diagnosed within the systems.

CONCLUSION

Numerous classification systems exist that include patients with leg pain, a minority of them focus specifically on distinguishing between different presentations of leg pain. Further work is needed to identify clinically meaningful subgroups of LBLP patients, ideally based on large primary care cohort populations and using recommended methods for classification system development.

Work-related chronic low back pain-return-to-work outcomes after referral to interventional pain and spine clinics

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate return-to-work outcomes in patients with chronic, work-related low back pain referred to pain treatment centers and/or spine clinics (PTCs/SCs).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Return-to-work outcomes in cases of work-related chronic low back pain after referral to PTCs and/or SCs have not been previously studied.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 230 consecutive patients was conducted from an occupational medicine program. Of these, 122 patients were referred to a PTC/SC and 108 patients were not. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop a model to predict improvement in functional status and pain level after 1 year.

RESULTS

At the 1-year evaluation, there was functional improvement in the nonreferral group (P < 0.001) and no change in the referral group (P = 0.21). The change in pain level was similar. Time from injury to initial evaluation seemed to be the major factor contributing to poor outcomes in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Referral to a PTC/SC did not yield improved functional outcomes in this cohort. A major factor contributing to this finding was the length of time to referral to PTC/SC after the initial injury.

Association between centralization, depression, somatization, and disability among patients with nonspecific low back pain

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether depression and somatization subscores of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), which have been shown to identify chronic disability in individuals with nonspecific low back pain, are applicable to a different population of individuals with low back pain; and to determine if this potential association is confounded by a combination of centralization and subsequent treatment based on centralization.

BACKGROUND

To help direct management of patients with nonspecific low back pain, recommendations include performing tests designed to identify psychosocial risk factors predictive of poor patient outcomes. SCL-90-R depression and somatization subscores have been shown to predict chronic disability among patients with low back pain.

METHODS

SCL-90-R depression and somatization subscores and data on centralization were collected during the initial physical therapy examination of 231 consecutive patients treated for low back pain in 2 clinics. Disability was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire at intake and discharge from physical therapy, and work status was determined by patient self-report at 6 and 12 months after discharge. Pain intensity was assessed by the numeric pain rating scale at the initial visit, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Data were analyzed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Odds ratios for the association between depression and somatization subscores and patient outcomes ranged from 0.76 to 2.93. For analyses in which the data suggested a trend toward an association, the association was less evident following adjustment for centralization and centralization-based treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In our sample, in which all individuals received physical therapy, and those who centralized received interventions based on the direction of centralization, SCL-90-R depression and somatization subscores were moderately associated with chronic pain and disability. This association was reduced when centralization and centralization-based treatment was considered in multivariable analyses.

[Non-specific lower back pain: In search of the origin of pain]

Lower back pain is a condition considered benign and with a specific cause determined only in 15% of patients. In the past years this concept has varied, because many papers have described no benign condition leading to back pain, citing their capacity to cause disability. Through many different diagnostic techniques it is possible to identify the structures capable of producing back pain. This identification, and the level of evidence of the interventional techniques, is the aim of this paper.

Treatment of Fibromyalgia, Myofascial Pain, and Related Disorders

Chronic muscle pain is a common complaint among patients who seek care for musculoskeletal disorders. A spectrum of clinical presentations exists, ranging from focal or regional complaints that usually represent myofascial pain syndromes to more wide spread pain that may meet criteria for a diagnosis of fibromyalgia. This article addresses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical management of myofascial pain syndrome and fibromyalgia. These conditions are challenging to treat and require physiatrists to be aware of the wide range of pharmacologic, rehabilitative,and psychosocial interventions that can be helpful.

Roadblocks to effective pain treatment

Managed care "backlash" rhetoric to the contrary, roadblocks to effective pain treatment occur both intrinsic and extrinsic to the healthcare system. Pain medicine, an emerging, formally recognized specialty, and the special population of patients which it serves, experience additional discreet barriers. Chief among these is a lack of clear identity and recognition of the specialty and the disenfranchisement of many of the patients it serves in the American healthcare system. Special problems within various healthcare financing environments is discussed.

Pain in fibromyalgia

Just as our caveman forebears were frail in the face of predatory animals, we are frail in today's society of childhood neglect or abuse, bumper-to-bumper traffic, frustration at work, and multiple daily hassles. The same neuroendocrine systems and pain regulatory mechanisms that protected early man during acute stress are still encoded in our genome, but may be maladaptive in psychologically and physiologically vulnerable people faced with chronic stress. Many patients with fibromyalgia become vulnerable because of the long-lasting psychological and neurophysiological effects of negative experiences in childhood. Ill-equipped with positive cognitive, emotional, and behavioral skills as adults, they display maladaptive coping strategies, low self-efficacy, and negative mood when confronted with the inevitable stressors of life. Psychological distress ensues, which reduces thresholds for pain perception and tolerance (already relatively low in women) even further. Converging lines of psychological and neurobiological evidence strongly suggest that chronic stress-related blunting of the HPA, sympathetic, and other axes of the stress response together with associated alterations in pain regulatory mechanisms may finally explain the pain and fatigue of fibromyalgia. Vulnerable people who can be classified by the ACR criteria as having fibromyalgia do not have a discrete disease. They are simply the most ill in a continuum of distress, chronic pain, and painful tender points in the general population.