Two Teflon granulomas of the nasopharynx and paravertebral space mimicking a neoplasm

Teflon has been proved to be able to extravasate and infiltrate into soft tissue to form an inflammatory giant-cell foreign-body reaction, a so-called Teflon granuloma. We present a rare case report of a patient with two Teflon granulomas of the head and neck, who were first interpreted as a neoplasm.

Appearance of cerebellar cyst following microvascular decompression to treat hemifacial spasm: a report of two cases and literature review

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is an effective and safe approach for treating hemifacial spasm (HFS). Postoperative complications may include facial nerve palsy, hearing loss, intracerebral haematoma, and brainstem infarction. The occurrence of intracranial cyst following MVD is extremely rare, with few cases documented in the literature. Herein, the cases of two patients with HFS who developed ipsilateral cerebellar cyst following MVD are reported. The first patient was a 50-year-old male presenting with a 6-year history of HFS on the right side of his face. MVD was performed, and 12 days postoperatively he developed dizziness and nausea. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a cyst in the ipsilateral cerebellum. Antibiotic treatment provided no benefit, and the cyst was drained. The second patient was a 44-year-old female presenting with a 4-year history of HFS on the right side of her face. MVD was performed, and 18 days following surgery, she developed dizziness and nausea. MRI showed an ipsilateral cerebellar cyst. Conservative treatment was applied and the cyst shrunk. At the 2-month follow-up appointment, symptoms were completely resolved in both patients. Cerebellar cyst is a rare complication following MVD. Timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment should be emphasized, and surgical treatment may be unnecessary.

Foreign Body Granuloma After Cranial Surgery: A Systematic Review of Reported Cases

BACKGROUND

In cranial surgery, different foreign body (FB) materials are used and may be left intentionally or unintentionally in the surgical field after closure, inducing a foreign body granuloma (FBG). This is a rare complication in neurosurgery, but it may be a diagnostic dilemma, with sometimes medicolegal implications.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the English literature between 1965 and 2018 and found a total of 77 articles concerning 100 cases of FBG caused by retained material located within the cranium or surrounding soft tissues.

RESULTS

There were 60 females and 40 males, with ages ranging from 1 to 77 years. Most initial diagnoses were cranial/intracranial tumors, trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, intracranial aneurysm, hydrocephalus, head injury, infectious disease, and nontraumatic intracerebral hematoma. The interval from the causative surgical operation to presentation of the FBG ranged from 2 weeks to 20 years. Various radiologic modalities were used and histologic study confirmed the presence of FBG in all patients. Intentional FB was used and left in 77 patients, and unintentional FB was found postoperatively in 23 patients. Associated infection was found in 13 patients. Complete recovery was seen in 47.6% of patients with sufficient data.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being unusual, a retained FBG should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any patient after cranial surgery. A history of surgery, clinical symptoms, physical examination findings, laboratory results, and the use of appropriate neuroimaging explorations may provide a correct preoperative diagnosis. In addition, unintentionally retained FBs are preventable errors in the operating room.

Revision Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia and Hemifacial Spasm: Factors Associated with Surgical Failure

Objective  To investigate risk factors for symptom recurrence in patients requiring a revision microvascular decompression (MVD) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) or hemifacial spasm (HFS). Design  Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Participants  Seventeen consecutive patients undergoing revision MVD at our institution between January 1993 and September 2017. Main Outcome Measures  The incidence and causes for revision MVDs were recorded. Response to revision MVD for TN was tracked using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) grading scale. Response to revision MVD for HFS was graded as "no improvement," "some relief," or "complete resolution" of symptoms. Results  Revision MVD rate for the senior author across all MVDs performed in this period was 1.9% for TN and 9.3% for HFS. Initial MVD failure was primarily caused by active inflammation and/or scarring and adhesions in 5/17 patients, malposition/slippage of Teflon in 3/17 patients, and insufficient Teflon in 1/17 patients. Without other factors, a new site of neurovascular conflict was identified in 4/17 patients, while the same site of neurovascular conflict was found in 3/17 patients. No cause could be identified in 1/17 patients. Scarring was found primarily in the TN group and was associated with symptom persistence. Conclusion  Revision MVD for recurrent TN and HFS is an effective procedure offering the prospect of a complete cure. Proper Teflon use is crucial for surgical success. Scarring after initial MVD is a negative prognostic factor requiring destructive treatment consideration. Although morbidity rates were slightly increased with revision versus original MVDs, the complications were non-disabling and resolved over time.

Teflon granuloma after microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a case report and literature review

Teflon has been commonly used as a surgical material. In particular, Teflon has been considered suitable for microvascular decompression of cranial nerves, as it is a stable, inert substance that does not resorb or migrate. Giant cell foreign body reactions after microvascular decompression (MVD) have been reported, but this rare complication has not been well recognized. Here, we report one case of Teflon granuloma that occurred 4 years after MVD for hemifacial spasm. We discuss the cause, histopathological analysis, particular MVD surgical methods, and management of Teflon granuloma.

Teflon granulomas mimicking cerebellopontine angle tumors following microvascular decompression

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To report two patients with a history of microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm who presented with Teflon granulomas (TG) mimicking cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors and to perform a systematic review of the English-language literature.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series at a single tertiary academic referral center and systematic review.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review with analysis of clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings. Systematic review using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases.

RESULTS

Two patients with large skull base TGs mimicking CPA tumors clinically and radiographically were managed at the authors' institution. The first presented 4 years after MVD with asymmetrical sensorineural hearing loss, multiple progressive cranial neuropathies, and brainstem edema due to a growing TG. Reoperation with resection of the granuloma confirmed a foreign-body reaction consisting of multinucleated giant cells containing intracytoplasmic Teflon particles. The second patient presented 11 years after MVD with asymmetrical sensorineural hearing loss and recurrent hemifacial spasm. No growth was noted over 2 years, and the patient has been managed expectantly. Only one prior case of TG after MVD for hemifacial spasm has been reported in the English literature.

CONCLUSIONS

TG is a rare complication of MVD for hemifacial spasm. The diagnosis should be suspected in patients presenting with a new-onset enhancing mass of the CPA after MVD, even when performed decades earlier. A thorough clinical and surgical history is critical toward establishing an accurate diagnosis to guide management and prevent unnecessary morbidity. Surgical intervention is not required unless progressive neurologic complications ensue.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 127:715-719, 2017.

Treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia due to Teflon granuloma

Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression (MVD) may be due to insufficient decompression, dislocation of the implant to pad the neurovascular contact, or the development of granuloma. Here, we report on our experience with Teflon granuloma including its treatment and histopathological examination. In a series of 200 patients with trigeminal neuralgia MVD was performed with Teflon felt according to Jannetta’s technique. In three patients with recurrent facial pain Teflon granuloma was found to be the cause for recurrence. In each instance, the granuloma was removed for histopathological examination. Mean age at the first procedure was 62.3 years and at the second procedure 66.3 years. Recurrence of pain occurred between 1 and 8.5 years after the first procedure. MRI scans demonstrated local gadolineum enhancement in the cerebellopontine angle, and CT scans showed local calcification. Intraoperatively dense fibrous tissue was found at the site of the Teflon granuloma. Histopathological examination revealed foreign body granuloma with multinuclear giant cells, collagen-rich hyalinized scar tissue, focal hemosiderin depositions, and microcalcifications. The Teflon granuloma was completely removed, and a new Teflon felt was used for re-decompression. Patients were free of pain after the second procedure at a mean of 40.3 months of follow-up. Teflon granuloma is a rare cause for recurrent facial pain after MVD. Small bleeding into the Teflon felt at surgery might trigger its development. A feasible treatment option is surgical re-exploration, nerve preserving removal of the granuloma, and repeat MVD.