Treatment of remote type ii axis fractures in the elderly: feasibility of anterior odontoid screw fixation

Management of fresh odontoid fractures using posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion: a long-term clinical follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

Posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion makes it possible to restore atlantoaxial motion after removing the implant, and it has been used as an alternative technique for odontoid fractures; however, the long-term efficacy of this technique remains uncertain. The purpose of the present study was to explore the long-term follow-up outcomes of patients with odontoid fractures who underwent posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 62 patients with type II/III fresh odontoid fractures who underwent posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion and were followed up for more than 5 years. The patients were divided into group A (23 patients with implant removal) and group B (39 patients without implant removal) based on whether they underwent a second surgery to remove the implant. The clinical outcomes were recorded and compared between the two groups. In group A, the range of motion (ROM) of C1-2 was calculated, and correlation analysis was performed to explore the factors that influence the ROM of C1-2.

RESULTS

A solid fracture fusion was found in all patients. At the final follow-up, no significant difference was found in visual analog scale score or American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale score between the two groups (p > 0.05), but patients in group A had a lower Neck Disability Index score and milder neck stiffness than did patients in group B (p < 0.05). In group A, 87.0% (20/23) of the patients had atlantoodontoid joint osteoarthritis at the final follow-up. In group A, the C1-2 ROM in rotation was 6.1° ± 4.5° at the final follow-up, whereas the C1-2 ROM in flexion-extension was 1.8° ± 1.2°. A negative correlation was found between the C1-2 ROM in rotation and the severity of tissue injury in the atlantoaxial region (r = -0.403, p = 0.024) and the degeneration of the atlantoodontoid joint (r = -0.586, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion can be used effectively for the management of fresh odontoid fractures. The removal of the implant can further improve the clinical efficacy, but satisfactory atlantoaxial motion cannot be maintained for a long time after implant removal. A surgeon should reconsider the contribution of posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion and secondary implant removal in preserving atlantoaxial mobility for patients with fresh odontoid fractures.

Determination and optimization of ideal patient candidacy for anterior odontoid screw fixation

Background:

Odontoid process fractures are one of the most common spine fractures, especially in patients over age 70. There is still much controversy over the ideal candidate for anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF), with outcomes affected by characteristics such as fracture morphology, nonideal body habitus, and osteoporosis. Therefore, this systematic review seeks to discuss the optimal criteria, indications, and adverse postoperative considerations when deciding to pursue AOSF.

Methods:

This investigation was conducted from experiential recall and article selection performed using the PubMed electronic bibliographic databases. The search yielded 124 articles that were assessed and filtered for relevance. Following the screening of titles and abstracts, 48 articles were deemed significant for final selection.

Results:

AOSF is often utilized to treat Type IIB odontoid fractures, which has been shown to preserve atlantoaxial motion, limit soft-tissue injuries/blood loss/vertebral artery injury/reduce operative time, provide adequate osteosynthesis, incur immediate spinal stabilization, and allow motion preservation of C1 and C2. However, this technique is limited by patient characteristics such as fracture morphology, transverse ligament rupture, remote injuries, short neck or inability to extend neck, barrel chested, and severe spinal kyphosis, in addition to adverse postoperative outcomes such as dysphagia and vocal cord paralysis.

Conclusion:

Due to the fact that odontoid fractures have a significant morbidity in elderly population, treatment with AOSF is generally recommended for this population with higher risk for nonoperative fusion. Considerations should be made to achieve fracture stability and fusion, while lowering the risk for operative and postoperative complications.

A new tool in percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation for odontoid fractures remains challenging due to the complex anatomy of the craniocervical junction. We designed a new guide instrument to help with the placement of guide wire, which have achieved satisfying surgical results. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new tool in percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with odontoid fracture were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation with the traditional guide instrument (n = 13) or the new guide instrument we designed (n = 16). The following clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups: operation time, radiograph times, incision length, blood loss, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative complications, bony union, fixation failure, and reoperation. Radiographs or CT scans were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative demographic data between the two groups. The operation time (56.62 ± 8.32 Vs 49.63 ± 7.47, P = 0.025) and radiograph times (26.54 ± 6.94 Vs 20.50 ± 5.02, P = 0.011) of the designed guide instrument group were significantly lower than those of the traditional guide instrument group. There were no significant differences in incision length (16.08 ± 3.07 Vs 15.69 ± 2.73, P = 0.720), blood loss (16.08 ± 4.96 Vs 17.88 ± 5.98, P = 0.393), postoperative hospitalization (7.15 ± 1.91 Vs 6.88 ± 2.36, P = 0.734), postoperative complications (7.7% Vs 12.5%, P = 1), and bony union (92.3% Vs 93.8%, P = 1) between the two groups. No fixation failure or reoperation occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The top of our designed guide instrument is a wedge-shaped tip with 30° inclination, which has a large contact area with the anterior surface of the cervical vertebra. According to our retrospective study, the guide instrument can reduce the operation time and radiograph times. It has potential clinical value, which needs further testing with a higher level of research design.

Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Anterior Screw Fixation for Odontoid Fracture and Analysis of the Predictive Factors for Surgical Failure

Objective

Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) is a safe and effective treatment for type II and rostral type III odontoid fracture. This study aimed to report the outcomes of the AOSF surgery and evaluate the potential risk factors of surgical failure.

Methods

We enrolled 63 patients who underwent AOSF. Follow-up computed tomography was performed 6 months after the surgery and once a year thereafter to evaluate the union. Clinical data including the age, sex, presenting symptoms, cause of injury, fracture gaps, dislocation position, degree of displacement, screw direction angle, and time interval from injury to operation were collected.

Results

Successful fusion was achieved in 55 patients (87.3%) and surgical failure occurred in 8 patients (12.7%). Variables such as age, sex, dislocation position, degree of displacement, screw direction angle, and time interval from injury to operation were not significantly associated with the surgical failure. However, surgical failure was statistically significantly associated with the fracture gap. The overall mean fracture gap at the time of injury was 1.29 mm (range, 0–3.11 mm), and the incidence of surgical failure was 8.3 times higher when the fracture gap at the time of injury was > 2 mm (p=0.019).

Conclusion

When performing AOSF in patients with type II or rostral shallow type III odontoid fractures, the displacement of the odontoid fracture fragment should be appropriately reduced to the aligning position before screw insertion and downward reduction should be achieved by perforation of the apical cortex of the odontoid during screw fixation, even if the surgery is delayed.

The Healing Rate of Type II Odontoid Fractures Treated With Posterior Atlantoaxial Screw-rod Fixation: A Retrospective Review of 77 Patients

BACKGROUND

In theory, temporary posterior atlantoaxial screw-rod fixation for type II odontoid fractures is a way to preserve rotatory motion. However, the healing rate of type II odontoid fractures treated in this way is unknown; that is, the risk associated with conducting a temporary screw-rod fixation for type II odontoid fractures is unknown. This study investigates the healing rate of type II odontoid fractures treated with posterior atlantoaxial screw-rod fixation by CT imaging and evaluates the feasibility of conducting a temporary screw-rod fixation for type II odontoid fractures.

METHODS

Patients with type II odontoid fracture who underwent posterior atlantoaxial screw-rod fixation in our spine center from January 2011 to December 2014 were identified. Patients older than 65 years or younger than 18 years were excluded. Those who were confirmed to have healing odontoid fractures on CT imaging were included. Those in whom fracture healing was not confirmed were asked to undergo a CT examination. Fracture healing was confirmed on the basis of the presence of bridging bone across the odontoid fracture site on CT imaging.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients (56 men and 21 women) were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 40.7 ± 11.6 years (range, 18 to 64 years). The mean duration of follow-up was 26.4 ± 4.6 months (range, 24 to 40 months). Fracture healing was observed in 73 patients (94.8%).

DISCUSSION

The healing rate of type II odontoid fractures (with an age range of 18 to 64 years) treated with modern posterior atlantoaxial fixation is relatively high. For patients at that age range, posterior atlantoaxial temporary screw-rod fixation for type II odontoid fractures can be conducted with a low risk of nonunion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic.

Analysis of Computed Tomography Scan After Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation with the Herbert Screw: Is It Effective to Reduce Fracture Gap?

OBJECTIVE

To assess computed tomography scans to evaluate the extent of reduction of fracture displacement and fracture gap after anterior odontoid screw fixation using the Herbert screw.

METHODS

Thirty-seven odontoid fractures were reduced and treated by anterior odontoid screw fixation with the Herbert screw. There were 37 patients whose age ranged from 20 to 79 years. Three-dimensional computed tomography scans were obtained for all patients to assess the screw position, the presence of the penetration of superior cortex of dens, the extent of reduction of fracture displacement, and fracture gap.

RESULTS

Mean fracture displacement was 2.6 ± 3.2 mm before surgery; after the operation this value was 1.0 ± 1.5 mm. The difference in fracture gap between the preoperative and the postoperative state was -0.1 ± 1.1 mm, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.667). We achieved cortical purchase in only 16 of 37 patients (43.2%); cortical purchase was not obtained in 21 patients (56.7%) due to the fear of the risk of the damage of neural and vascular structures. Of these 21 patients who had no penetration of the superior cortex of dens, widening of the fracture gap occurred in 12 patients (57%), no change in 6 patients (29%), and there was shortening in 3 patients (14%). However, of the 16 patients with penetration of apical dens tip, we achieved significant reduction of fracture gap (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

To maximize reduction of fracture gap using the Herbert screw, it is essential to penetrate the apical dens tip.

Comparison of Atlantoaxial Rotation and Functional Outcomes of Two Nonfusion Techniques in the Treatment of Anderson-D'Alonzo Type II Odontoid Fractures

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of anterior screw fixation and posterior temporary-fixation in the treatment of Anderson-D'Alonzo type II odontoid fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior C1-C2 temporary-fixation can spare the motion of C1-C2 in the treatment of odontoid fractures. However, it is unknown whether it can achieve the same outcomes as anterior screw fixation.

METHODS

Data of 20 patients who underwent posterior temporary-fixation due to Anderson-D'Alonzo type II odontoid fractures with intact transverse ligament were retrospectively reviewed. Another 20 patients undergoing anterior screw fixation were randomly selected as the control group. The range of motion (ROM) in rotation of C1-C2 measured on functional computed tomography (CT) scan and outcomes evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) for neck pain, neck stiffness, patient satisfaction, and neck disability index (NDI) were compared between two groups at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, 19 cases in each groups achieved facture healing. Total C1-C2 ROM in rotation on both sides in the posterior temporary-fixation group was 32.4 ± 12.5°, smaller than 40.0 ± 13.0 in the anterior fixation group. However, there was no statistical difference between two groups. And there was no significant difference between two groups in functional outcomes evaluated by VAS for neck pain, neck stiffness, patient satisfaction, and NDI.

CONCLUSION

Posterior temporary-fixation can spare the motion of C1-C2 and achieve same good clinical outcomes as anterior screw fixation in the treatment of Anderson-D'Alonzo type II odontoid fractures. It was an ideal alternative strategy to anterior screw fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Posterior C1-C2 Temporary Fixation Without Fusion and C1-C2 Fusion for Fresh Odontoid Fractures

BACKGROUND:

Posterior C1-C2 temporary-fixation technique can spare the range of motion (ROM) of the atlantoaxial joint after odontoid fracture healing. However, few studies analyze the difference in clinical outcome between this technique and posterior C1-C2 fusion technique for new odontoid fracture.

OBJECTIVE:

To verify whether the clinical outcome of the posterior C1-C2 temporary-fixation technique is superior to that of the posterior C1-C2 fusion technique in the treatment of a new odontoid fracture.

METHODS:

Twenty-one of 22 patients who underwent posterior C1-C2 temporary fixation of an odontoid fracture achieved fracture healing and regained motion of the atlantoaxial joint. The functional outcomes of these 21 patients were compared with that of a control group, which consisted of 21 randomly enrolled cases with posterior C1-C2 fixation and fusion. The differences between the 2 groups in the visual analog scale score for neck pain, neck stiffness, Neck Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and time to fracture healing were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Significantly better outcomes were observed in the temporary-fixation group for visual analog scale score for neck pain, Neck Disability Index, and neck stiffness. The outcomes in the temporary-fixation group was superior to those in the fusion group in all dimensions of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. There were no significant differences in fracture healing rate and time to fracture healing between the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSION:

Functional outcomes were significantly better after posterior C1-C2 temporary fixation than after fusion. Temporary fixation can be used as a salvage treatment for an odontoid fracture with an intact transverse ligament in cases of failure of, or contraindication to, anterior screw fixation.

C1-c2 pedicle screw fixation for treatment of old odontoid fractures

Nonunion and C1-C2 instability of odontoid fractures usually result from delayed diagnosis and inappropriate treatment. However, the available treatment options for odontoid fractures remain controversial. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of internal screw fixation via the C1 and C2 pedicle in cases of old odontoid fractures. This retrospective study included 21 patients with old odontoid fractures (13 men and 8 women; mean age, 46.5 years; range, 24-69 years). Internal screw fixation via the C1 and C2 pedicle was performed in all patients. Fracture reduction and C1-C2 fusion were assessed with imaging. The neck pain visual analog scale score and cervical spinal cord functional Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (for those who had cervical spinal cord injury) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. Postoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative imaging showed that the C1-C2 dislocation was satisfactorily repositioned in all patients. Bone fusion was observed 1 year after surgery in all patients. No loosening or breaking of internal fixation occurred. The preoperative neck pain visual analog scale score was 5.9±1.5 and improved significantly to 1.8±0.8 after surgery (P<.001). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score in patients with cervical spinal injury (n=14) was 9.2±1.9 and also significantly improved to 13.8±1.9 at the last follow-up examination (P<.001), with an average improvement rate of 61.0%. No iatrogenic vertebral artery injury or severe spinal cord injury occurred. Screw fixation via the C1 and C2 pedicle was found to be an effective and safe surgical approach for the treatment of old odontoid fractures with C1-C2 dislocation or instability.

Pooled analysis of non-union, re-operation, infection, and approach related complications after anterior odontoid screw fixation

Background

Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) has been one of the most popular treatments for odontoid fractures. However, the true efficacy of AOSF remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to provide the pooled rates of non-union, reoperation, infection, and approach related complications after AOSF for odontoid fractures.

Methods

We searched studies that discussed complications after AOSF for type II or type III odontoid fractures. A proportion meta-analysis was done and potential sources of heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression analysis.

Results

Of 972 references initially identified, 63 were eligible for inclusion. 54 studies provided data regarding non-union. The pooled non-union rate was 10% (95% CI: 7%–3%). 48 citations provided re-operation information with a pooled proportion of 5% (95% CI: 3%–7%). Infection was described in 20 studies with an overall rate of 0.2% (95% CI: 0%–1.2%). The main approach related complication is postoperative dysphagia with a pooled rate of 10% (95% CI: 4%–17%). Proportions for the other approach related complications such as postoperative hoarseness (1.2%, 95% CI: 0%–3.7%), esophageal/retropharyngeal injury (0%, 95% CI: 0%–1.1%), wound hematomas (0.2%, 95% CI: 0%–1.8%), and spinal cord injury (0%, 95% CI: 0%–0.2%) were very low. Significant heterogeneities were detected when we combined the rates of non-union, re-operation, and dysphagia. Multivariate meta-regression analysis showed that old age was significantly predictive of non-union. Subgroup comparisons showed significant higher non-union rates in age ≥70 than that in age ≤40 and in age 40 to <50. Meta-regression analysis did not reveal any examined variables influencing the re-operation rate. Meta-regression analysis showed age had a significant effect on the dysphagia rate.

Conclusions/Significances

This study summarized the rates of non-union, reoperation, infection, and approach related complications after AOSF for odontoid factures. Elderly patients were more likely to experience non-union and dysphagia.

Elderly patients are at increased risk for mortality undergoing surgical repair of dens fractures

OBJECTIVE

Dens fractures are common cervical injuries in advanced aged patients. The presented study was undertaken to analyze the clinical results and risks of surgically treated patients with dens fractures over 70 years.

METHODS

Data of 28 patients (17 female, 11 male) over 70 years treated from September 2004 to October 2009 were recorded. Clinical and radiological parameters were obtained including type of fracture, associated cervical and/or other injuries, comorbidities, symptoms, neurological condition, surgical strategy, postoperative course and complications.

RESULTS

89% were in a good neurological condition before surgery (ASIA E or D). In most cases, surgery was performed at an early stage after trauma (21 patients within 5 days). Ventral screw fixation was the preferred surgical strategy (64%). A slight worsening of neurological functions immediately after operation was only seen in one patient. Five patients died in the early and 2 in the late postoperative course which means a treatment mortality of 25%. Among the surviving patients two had general medical complications.

CONCLUSION

Type II dens fractures are a common fracture of elderly patients. Our results are good concerning the neurological functions. Surgical and general medical complications were acceptable. However, the study also underlines that mortality rate is high and therefore treatment options should be well-considered in this high risk group.

Biomechanical evaluation of 2 insertion points for ventral screw fixation of C-2 dens fractures

Object

For many Type II fractures of the dens (Anderson and D'Alonzo classification), a double anterior screw fixation is performed. If screw disruption occurs, the location is most often at the anterior caudal endplate and body of the axis and not directly at the fracture line. The authors' objective was to determine the differences in primary mechanical stability at 2 insertion points used in ventral screw fixation of Type II fractures of the C-2 dens.

Methods

Screw fixation was performed on 16 formalin-fixed human C-2 dens specimens. The specimens were divided into 2 groups. For Group 1, the screws were inserted directly at the anterior lower endplates; for Group 2, the screws were inserted 2 mm dorsal to the anterior wall of the vertebral body. After a Type II odontoid fracture was created with an oscillating saw, screw fixation was performed using two 3.5-mm partially threaded lag screws with washers. Subsequently, each vertebral body was continuously loaded. The criterion for breakage was reversal of the force vector.

Results

In Group 1, screw disruption occurred at the point of entry; the mean load failure was 290.5 ± 106 N. In Group 2, no screw disruption occurred; the mean load failure was 574.2 ± 170.5 N. These results were significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

For double screw fixation of Type II fractures of the dens (Anderson and D'Alonzo classification), placement of the screws as far dorsal to the anterior lower endplate as possible seems to favorably affect primary stability. In actual clinical practice, care should be taken to not damage the anterior wall of the vertebral body of the axis during screw insertion.

Analysis of risk factors associated with fusion failure after anterior odontoid screw fixation

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of fusion failure after anterior screw fixation of type II and rostral shallow type III fractures and to identify related risk factors.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although several studies have reported fusion rates after anterior odontoid screw fixation of type II and rostral shallow type III fractures, few reports have analyzed in detail the risk factors associated with fusion failure.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with a type II and rostral shallow type III odontoid fracture were treated using anterior screw fixation. The patients were 33 men and 8 women mean age = 46.6 years; age range = 15-79 years. Range of follow-up was 7 to 48 months.

RESULTS

Anterior odontoid screw fixation resulted in solid bony union in 33 patients (80.5%), fibrous union in 3 (7.3%), and nonunion in 5 (12.2%). When surgery was delayed for more than 1 week, the incidence of fusion failure significantly increased (P = 0.0051). Furthermore, a fracture gap of 2 mm or more was found to be significantly associated with fusion failure (P = 0.0172). However, patient age and fracture displacement were not found to be significantly associated with fusion failure (P = 0.8236 and P = 0.5762, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study of anterior odontoid screw fixation reveals that the risk of fusion failure is 37.5 times greater in patients with a delay of more than 1 week before operation, and 21 times greater in patients with a fracture gap of greater than 2 mm.

Avoiding pitfalls in anterior screw fixation for Type II odontoid fractures

Anterior screw fixation of Type II odontoid fractures provides immediate stabilization of the cervical spine while preserving C1–2 motion. This technique has a high fusion rate, but can be technically challenging. The authors identify key points that should be taken into account to maximize the chance for a favorable outcome. Keys to success include proper patient and fracture selection, identification of suitable screw entry point and correct screw trajectory, achieving bicortical purchase, and placing 2 screws when feasible and applicable. The authors review the operative technique and present guidance on appropriate patient selection and common pitfalls in anterior screw fixation, with strategies for avoiding complications.

Is All Anterior Oblique Fracture Orientation Really a Contraindication to Anterior Screw Fixation of Type II and Rostral Shallow Type III Odontoid Fractures?

OBJECTIVE

It is debatable whether an anterior oblique fracture orientation is really a contraindication to anterior odontoid screw fixation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of anterior odontoid screw fixation of type II and rostral shallow type III fracture with an anterior oblique fracture orientation.

METHODS

The authors evaluated 16 patients with type II and rostral shallow type III odontoid fracture with an anterior oblique fracture orientation. Of these 16 patients, 8 (group 1) were treated by anterior odontoid screw fixation, and 8 (group 2) by a posterior C1-2 arthrodesis.

RESULTS

Of the 8 patients in group 1, seven patients achieved solid bone fusion (87.5%), and one experienced screw back-out of the C-2 body two months after anterior screw fixation. All patients treated by posterior C1-C2 fusion in group 2 achieved successful bone fusion. Mean fracture displacements and fracture gaps were not significantly different in two groups. (p=0.075 and 0.782). However, mean fracture orientation angles were 15.3±3.2 degrees in group 1, and 28.6+8.1 degrees in group 2 (p=0.002), and mean fragment angulations were 3.2±2.1 degrees in group 1, and 14.8±6.7 degrees in group 2 (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Even when the fracture lines of type II and rostral shallow type III fractures are oriented in an anterior oblique direction, anterior odontoid screw fixation can be feasible in carefully selected patients with a relatively small fracture orientation angle and relatively small fragment angulation.

Tratamento das fraturas do processo odontóide

OBJETIVO: Este artigo faz a avaliação retrospectiva clínica e radiológica das fraturas do odontóide de 20 pacientes atendidos no IOT-HCFMUSP, durante o período de 2004-2010. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado a estratificação destas fraturas segundo sua classificação (AO/Anderson e D'Alonzo), perfil epidemiológico, tipo de tratamento, tempo de consolidação e complicações. RESULTADOS: Observou-se maior número de casos da fratura do odontóide em pacientes do sexo masculino (4:1), com idade entre 3ª e 4ª década de vida (60%), vítimas de quedas de altura (60%) e acidentes automobilísticos (25%) como principais mecanismos de trauma, e 15% dos casos apresentaram-se com déficit neurológico. A fraturas do odontóide de maior prevalência foram as do tipo II (55%), seguidas pelas fraturas do tipo III (40%). Os tratamentos mais empregados nas fraturas do tipo II e III foram, respectivamente, o cirúrgico (73%) e conservador (87,5%). A consolidação ocorreu em até 16 semanas para 87,5% dos casos de tratamento cirúrgico e para 54,5% dos tratados conservadoramente. Não houve casos de pseudoartrose. CONCLUSÃO: O tratamento cirúrgico das fraturas do odontóide do tipo II apresentou resultados satisfatórios em relação ao tempo consolidação e baixa incidência de complicações, bem como o tratamento conservador destinado às fraturas do tipo III.Nivel de Evidência IV, série de casos.

Odontoid fractures: A retrospective analysis of 53 cases

BACKGROUND

The management of odontoid fracture has evolved but controversy persists as to the best method for Type II odontoid fractures with or without atlantoaxial (AA) instability. The anterior odontoid screw fixation can be associated with significant morbidity while delayed odontoid screw fixation has shown to be associated with reasonable good fusion rates. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the outcome of a trial of conservative management in type II odontoid fractures without atlantoaxial instability (Group A) followed by delayed odontoid screw fixation in cases in which fusion was not achieved by conservative treatment. The outcome of type II odontoid fracture with AA subluxation (Group B) was also analysed where closed reduction on traction could be achieved and in those atlantoaxial subluxations that were irreducible an intraoperative reduction was done.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of 53 cases of odontoid fractures treated over a 9-year period is being reported. All odontoid fractures without AA instability (n=29) were initially managed conservatively. Three patients who did not achieve union with conservative management were treated with delayed anterior screw fixation. Twenty-four cases of odontoid fractures were associated with AA instability; 17 of them could be reduced with skeletal traction and were managed with posterior fusion and fixation. Of the seven cases that were irreducible, the initial three cases were treated by odontoid excision followed by posterior fusion and fixation; however, in the later four cases, intra operative reduction was achieved by a manipulation procedure, and posterior fusion and fixation was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six of 29 cases of odontoid fracture without AA instability achieved fracture union with conservative management whereas the remaining three patients achieved union following delayed anterior odontoid screw fixation. 17 out of 24 odontoid fracture with atlantoaxial dislocation could be reduced on traction and these patients underwent posterior fusion and fixation. Optimal or near optimal reduction was achieved by on table manipulation in four cases which were irreducible with skeletal traction. Atlantoaxial stability was achieved in all cases. All cases were noted to be stable on evaluation with x-rays at six months.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial conservative management and use of odontoid screw fixation only in cases where conservative management for 6-12 weeks has failed to provide fracture union have shown good outcome in type II odontoid fracture without AA instability rates. Intraoperative manipulation and reduction in patients where AA subluxation failed to reduce on skeletal traction followed by posterior fusion obviates the need for transoral odontoid excision.