Is exposure of the superior sagittal sinus necessary in the interhemispheric approach?

Quantitative Anatomical Studies in Neurosurgery: A Systematic and Critical Review of Research Methods

BACKGROUND

The anatomy laboratory can provide the ideal setting for the preclinical phase of neurosurgical research. Our purpose is to comprehensively and critically review the preclinical anatomical quantification methods used in cranial neurosurgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid EMBASE databases were searched, yielding 1667 papers. A statistical analysis was performed using R.

RESULTS

The included studies were published from 1996 to 2023. The risk of bias assessment indicated high-quality studies. Target exposure was the most studied feature (81.7%), mainly with area quantification (64.9%). The surgical corridor was quantified in 60.9% of studies, more commonly with the quantification of the angle of view (60%). Neuronavigation-based methods benefit from quantifying the surgical pyramid features that define a cranial neurosurgical approach and allowing post-dissection data analyses. Direct measurements might diminish the error that is inherent to navigation methods and are useful to collect a small amount of data.

CONCLUSION

Quantifying neurosurgical approaches in the anatomy laboratory provides an objective assessment of the surgical corridor and target exposure. There is currently limited comparability among quantitative neurosurgical anatomy studies; sharing common research methods will provide comparable data that might also be investigated with artificial intelligence methods.

Comparison Between the Supracerebellar Infratentorial and Precuneal Interhemispheric, Transtentorial Approaches to the Cerebellomesencephalic Fissure: An Anatomoradiological Study and Illustrative Cases

BACKGROUND

The dorsal brainstem and cerebellomesencephalic fissure are challenging surgical targets. To afford a preferentially craniocaudal trajectory to this region, the precuneal interhemispheric transtentorial approach (PCIT) has been proposed.

OBJECTIVE

To didactically describe and compare exposures and anatomic indications of the supracerebellar infratentorial approach (SCIT) and PCIT to the cerebellomesencephalic fissure.

METHODS

Nine formalin-fixed, latex-injected cadaveric head specimens were used to perform a midline SCIT and bilateral PCITs and measure the distance of each approach. Twenty-four formalin-fixed specimens were used to measure the distance from the most posterior cortical bridging vein entering the superior sagittal sinus to the calcarine sulcus and the torcula. Fifty-one magnetic resonance images were reviewed to calculate the angle of each approach. Three illustrative surgical cases were described.

RESULTS

Mean distances from the brain or cerebellar surface to the operative target of the PCIT and SCIT were 7.1 cm (range: 5-7.7 cm) and 5.5 cm (range: 3.8-6.2 cm), respectively. The SCIT provided direct access to structures of the quadrigeminal cistern bilaterally. The PCIT provided access from the ipsilateral inferior colliculus to the ipsilateral infratrochlear zone. The PCIT's benefit was the direct access it provided to the cerebellomesencephalic fissure because of its superior to inferior trajectory.

CONCLUSION

The PCIT is indicated for unilateral lesions of the cerebellomesencephalic fissure and dorsal brainstem that harbor a craniocaudal long axis and do not have a superior extension beyond the superior colliculi. The SCIT is beneficial for lesions that extend bilaterally, have an anteroposterior long axis, or involve the Galenic complex.

The precuneal interhemispheric, trans-tentorial corridor to the pineal region and brainstem, surgical anatomy, and case illustration

BACKGROUND

The pineal region and dorsal midbrain are among the most challenging surgical targets. To approach lesions in this region that harbor a superior to inferior long axis, we describe the basic steps of the precuneal, interhemispheric, trans-tentorial approach and illustrate anatomical landmarks of this established, but not so popular, surgical trajectory.

METHOD

To study the anatomical landmarks and safety of this approach, the neurovascular anatomy was studied on 22 sides of 11 formalin-fixed latex-injected anatomical specimens. A step-by-step dissection of the precuneal interhemispheric trans-tentorial approach and study of the key anatomical landmarks was performed. An illustrative clinical case of a pontomesencephalic cavernous malformation (CM) resected through this approach is also detailed.

RESULTS

The mean distance from the transverse sinus to the most posterior cortical vein draining into the superior sagittal sinus was 6.4 cm. The mean distance from the calcarine sulcus to the most posterior cortical vein was 5.3 cm. Key steps of the dissection are as follows: craniotomy exposing the posterior aspect of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS), durotomy and gentle retraction of the SSS edge, dissection of the interhemispheric fissure, linear incision of the tentorium that extends anteriorly to the incisura and lateral reflection of the tentorium, and arachnoidal dissection and exposure of the cerebellomesencephalic fissure.

CONCLUSION

The precuneal, interhemispheric, trans-tentorial approach affords excellent access to the falcotentorial junction, splenium, pineal region, quadrigeminal cistern, and dorsal pons once the cerebellomesencephalic fissure has been dissected.

Relationship of superior sagittal sinus with sagittal midline: A surgical application

Background:

Interhemispheric approach is widely used to surgical management of midline tumors and vascular lesion in and around the third ventricle. Complete exposure of the superior sagittal sinus to obtain adequate working space of midline lesion is difficult, because of the risk to inadvertent injury to the sinus and bridging veins, which may cause several neurological deficits. Understanding the SSS neuroanatomy and its relationships with external surgical landmarks avoid such complications. The objective of this study is to accurately describe the position of SSS and its displacement in relation with sagittal midline by magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods:

A retrospective cross-sectional, observational study was performed. Magnetic resonance image of 76 adult patients with no pathological imaging was analyzed. The position of the halfway between nasion and bregma, bregma, halfway between bregma and lambda, and lambda was performed. The width and the displacement of the superior sagittal sinus accordingly to the sagittal midline were assessed in those landmarks.

Results:

The mean width of superior sagittal sinus at halfway between nasion and bregma, bregma, halfway between bregma and lambda, and lambda was 5.62 ± 2.5, 6.5 ± 2.8, 7.4 ± 3.2, and 8.5 ± 2.1 mm, respectively, without gender discrepancy. The mean displacement according to the midline at those landmarks showed a statistically significant difference to the right side among sexes.

Conclusion:

In this study, we demonstrate that sagittal midline may approximate external location of the superior sagittal sinus. Our data showed that in the majority of the cases, the superior sagittal sinus is displaced to the right side of sagittal midline as far as 16.3 mm. The data we obtained provide useful information that suggest that neurosurgeons should use safety margin to perform burr holes and drillings at the sagittal midline.

The interhemispheric fissure-surgical outcome of interhemispheric approaches

Exposure of the anterior skull base is challenging due to strategic structures. The interhemispheric approach (IHA) has turned out to be a feasible technique. We report our experience with IHAs in patients with extraaxial lesions (EAL). We performed a retrospective chart review at a tertiary neurosurgical center between April 2009 and March 2020. We included patients with resection of EAL through IHAs concentrating on surgical technique, complete resection rate, postoperative outcome, and complications. Seventy-four patients resected by an IHA were included: 49 (66.2%) frontal (FIA), nine (12.1%) parietooccipital (PIA), and 16 (21.6%) frontobasal IHAs (FBIAs). Median age at time of surgery was 59 years (range 16–88 years), 47 (63.5%) female and 27 (36.5%) male. Complete resection rate was 83.8% (FIA 89.8%, PIA 55.6%, FBIA 81.3%). Rate of new minor deficits was 17.6%, rate of major deficits 5.4%, total rate 23.0%. 51 (68.9%) WHO°I meningiomas, ten (13.5%) WHO°II meningiomas, two (2.7%) WHO°III meningiomas, nine (12.2%) metastases, one (1.4%) sarcoma, and one (1.4%) local adenocarcinoma were resected. Total complication rate was 27.0%. Rate of major complications requiring intervention was 9.6%. Mean follow-up was 34.2 (± 33.2) months. In patients with lesions of the interhemispheric fissure, overall morbidity and complications are comparatively high. Extensions of IHAs with potential even higher morbidity are not necessary though; we support the use of standardized IHAs. Our findings suggest regular usage of relatively feasible IHAs for a satisfying outcome. Invasive, complicated, or contralateral trajectories were not needed.

Exposure of Dural Venous Sinuses: A Review of Techniques and Description of a Single-piece Troughed Craniotomy

Intracranial lesions along the falx and tentorium often require exposure of a dural venous sinus. Craniotomies that cross a sinus should maximize exposure while minimizing the risk of sinus injury and provide a cosmetically appealing result with simple reconstruction techniques. 

We describe the published techniques for exposing dural venous sinuses, and introduce a new technique for a single-piece craniotomy exposing the superior sagittal sinus or transverse sinus using drilled troughs.

A review of the literature was performed to identify articles detailing operative techniques for craniotomies over dural venous sinuses. Our troughed craniotomy for dural sinus exposure is described in detail as well as our experience using this technique in 82 consecutive cases from 2007-2015.

Five distinct techniques for exposure of the dural venous sinus were identified in the literature. In our series of patients undergoing a trough craniotomy, there were no sinus injuries despite a range of various locations and pathology along the sagittal and transverse sinuses. Our technique was found to be safe and simple to reconstruct compared to other techniques found in the literature.

A variety of different techniques for exposing the dural venous sinuses are available. A single-piece craniotomy using a trough technique is a safe means to achieve venous sinus exposure with minimal reconstruction required. Surgeons should consider this method when removing lesions adjacent to the falx or tentorium. 

Quantitative anatomical comparison of the ipsilateral and contralateral interhemispheric transcallosal approaches to the lateral ventricle

OBJECTIVE The best approach to deep-seated lateral and third ventricle lesions is a function of lesion characteristics, location, and relationship to the ventricles. The authors sought to examine and compare angles of attack and surgical freedom of anterior ipsilateral and contralateral interhemispheric transcallosal approaches to the frontal horn of the lateral ventricle using human cadaveric head dissections. Illustrative clinical experiences with a contralateral interhemispheric transcallosal approach and an anterior interhemispheric transcallosal transchoroidal approach are also related. METHODS Five formalin-fixed human cadaveric heads (10 sides) were examined microsurgically. CT and MRI scans obtained before dissection were uploaded and fused into the navigation system. The authors performed contralateral and ipsilateral transcallosal approaches to the lateral ventricle. Using the navigation system, they measured areas of exposure, surgical freedom, angles of attack, and angle of view to the surgical surface. Two clinical cases are described. RESULTS The exposed areas of the ipsilateral (mean [± SD] 313.8 ± 85.0 mm²) and contralateral (344 ± 87.73 mm²) interhemispheric approaches were not significantly different (p = 0.12). Surgical freedom and vertical angles of attack were significantly larger for the contralateral approach to the most midsuperior reachable point (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively) and to the posterosuperior (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04) and central (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02) regions of the lateral wall of the lateral ventricle. Surgical freedom and vertical angles of attack to central and anterior points on the floor of the lateral ventricle did not differ significantly with approach. The angle to the surface of the caudate head region was less steep for the contralateral (135.6° ± 15.6°) than for the ipsilateral (152.0° ± 13.6°) approach (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The anterior contralateral interhemispheric transcallosal approach provided a more expansive exposure to the lower two-thirds of the lateral ventricle and striothalamocapsular region. In normal-sized ventricles, the foramen of Monro and the choroidal fissure were better visualized through the lateral ventricle ipsilateral to the craniotomy than through the contralateral approach.

Quantification and comparison of neurosurgical approaches in the preclinical setting: literature review

There is a growing awareness of the need for evidence-based surgery and of the issues that are specific to research in surgery. Well-conducted anatomical studies can represent the first, preclinical step for evidence-based surgical innovation and evaluation. In the last two decades, various reports have quantified and compared neurosurgical approaches in the anatomy laboratory using different methods and technology. The aim of this study was to critically review these papers. A PubMed and Scopus search was performed to select articles that quantified and compared different neurosurgical approaches in the preclinical setting. The basic characteristics that anatomically define a surgical approach were defined. Each study was analyzed for measured features and quantification method and technique. Ninety-nine papers, published from 1990 to 2013, were included in this review. A heterogeneous use of terms to define the features of a surgical approach was evident. Different methods to study these features have been reported; they are generally based on quantification of distances, angles, and areas. Measuring tools have evolved from the simple ruler to frameless stereotactic devices. The reported methods have each specific advantages and limits; a common limitation is the lack of 3D visualization and surgical volume quantification. There is a need for a uniform nomenclature in anatomical studies. Frameless stereotactic devices provide a powerful tool for anatomical studies. Volume quantification and 3D visualization of the surgical approach is not provided with most available methods.

Midline as a landmark for the position of the superior sagittal sinus on the cranial vault: An anatomical and imaging study

Background:

Craniotomies involving the midline are regular practice in neurosurgery, during which injury to the superior sagittal sinus (SSS), an uncommon yet devastating event, may occur. The midline tends to be the most common landmark used to identify the position of the SSS. In this study we examined the reliability of the midline as a landmark for the SSS.

Methods:

We performed bilateral craniectomies on eight cadaveric heads, preserving the coronal, sagittal, and lambdoid sutures. The width of the SSS and its displacement from midline were measured on the cadaveric specimens and on 105 normal magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the head at the following locations: halfway between nasion and bregma (NB), bregma (B), halfway between bregma and lambda (BL), lambda (L), and inion (I).

Results:

In all cadaveric specimens, the SSS was partially or totally displaced toward one side of midline, usually to the right. It tended to be closer to midline in the frontal region and more displaced posteriorly. The SSS usually drained into the right-side transverse sinus. The mean width of the SSS was 4.3, 5.9, 6.9, 7.9, and 7.8 mm, and the average displacement from midline was 4.3, 6.3, 5.5, 6.9, and 6.0 mm for NB, B, BL, L, and I, respectively. These measurements were then compared with those obtained from the MRIs.

Conclusion:

The SSS was consistently displaced on either side of midline. Thus, the midline is not reliable for identifying the SSS, and caution should be used within 6–10 mm on either side of midline.

Could craniometric measurements explain the growth of the superior sagittal sinus?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to relate demographic variables and craniometric measures with measurements of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) at different points along the path of the SSS. The findings were then discussed with regards to theories of skull growth.

METHODS

We studied 33 skulls with known demographic characteristics and measured various craniometric parameters and distances related to the specific dimensions of the SSS. These data were statistically analyzed, and the results are presented.

RESULTS

Of the 33 cadaver samples, 16 were female and 17 were male, aged between 28 and 87 years at the time of death. The cross-sectional area of the SSS measured at the coronary suture was positively correlated with the biauricular length. In addition, when measured 1.5 cm above the torcula, the cross-sectional area of the SSS was negatively correlated with the distance between the medial epicanthi.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationships found may indicate that the growth of the SSS is proportional to the activity of each segment of the SSS that occurs along its path.