Biomechanical Comparison of Facet Versus Laminar C2 Screws

BACKGROUND

Transpedicular or transisthmic screws for C2 instrumentation represent the gold standard; however, the anatomy is not always compatible (hypoplastic pedicles, procidentia of the vertebral artery). Laminar screws (LS) have been proposed as a rescue technique and recently, bicortical facet screws (FS). To date, the biomechanical property of FS remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the pull-out resistance of bicortical facet (FS) vs laminar (LS) C2 screws.

METHODS

Thirty-two human cadaveric C2 vertebrae were screened by CT scan imaging and dual x-ray absorptiometry before receiving both techniques and were randomized according to side and sequence (FS or LS first). Screw positioning was validated using 2-dimensional x-rays. Sixty-four mechanical tests were performed using pure tensile loading along the axis of the screws until pull-out. Mean pull-out strengths were compared using paired tests, multivariate and survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier curves).

RESULTS

The morphometric data were consistent with previous studies. Over 64 tests, the mean pull-out strength of LS (707 ± 467 N) was significantly higher than that of FS (390 ± 230 N) ( P = .0004). Bone mineral density was weakly correlated with pull-out strength (r = 0.42 for FS and r = 0.3 for LS). Both techniques were mechanically equivalent for vertebrae in which intralaminar cortical grip was not achievable for LS. The mean pull-out strength for LS with laminar cortical grip (1071 ± 395 N) was significantly higher than that of LS without (423 ± 291 N) ( P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that bicortical FS of C2 offer less mechanical resistance than LS.

Spontaneous Osseous Fusion after Remodeling Therapy for Chronic Atlantoaxial Rotatory Fixation and Recovery Mechanism of Rotatory Range of Motion of the Cervical Spine

We aimed to investigate the risk factors of spontaneous osseous fusion (SOF) of the atlantoaxial joint after closed reduction under general anesthesia followed by halo fixation (remodeling therapy) for chronic atlantoaxial rotatory fixation, and to elucidate the recovery mechanism of the rotatory range of motion (ROM) after halo removal. Twelve patients who underwent remodeling therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Five patients with SOF were categorized as the fusion group and seven patients without SOF as the non-fusion group. Three dimensional CT was used to detect direct osseous contact (DOC) of facet joints before and during halo fixation, while dynamic CT at neutral and maximally rotated head positions was performed to measure rotatory ROM after halo removal. The duration from onset to initial visit was significantly longer (3.2 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.04), incidence of DOC during halo fixation was higher (0/7 [0%] vs. 4/5 [80%], p = 0.004), and segmental rotatory ROM of Occiput/C1 (Oc/C1) at final follow-up was larger (9.8 vs. 20.1 degrees, p = 0.003) in the fusion group. Long duration from the onset to the initial visit might induce irreversible damage to the articular surface of the affected facet, which was confirmed as DOC during halo fixation and resulted in SOF. Long duration from the onset to the initial visit and DOC during halo fixation could be used to suggest the risk for SOF. Nonetheless, rotatory ROM of Oc/C1 increased to compensate for SOF.

Can C1 lateral mass and C3 pedicle screw fixation be used as an option for atlantoaxial reduction and stabilization in Klippel-Feil patients? A study of its morphological feasibility, technical nuances, and clinical efficiency

In Klippel-Feil patients with atlantoaxial dislocation, narrow C2 pedicles are often encountered preventing pedicle screw placement. Alternative techniques, including translaminar screws, pars screws, and inferior process screws could not achieve 3-column rigid fixation, and have shown inferior biomechanical stability. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of C3 pedicle screws (C3PSs) as an option for atlantoaxial stabilization in Klippel-Feil patients, and to introduce a freehand technique, the "medial sliding technique," for safe and accurate C3PS insertion. Thirty-seven Klippel-Feil patients with congenital C2-3 fusion who have received atlantoaxial fixation were reviewed. Preoperative CT and CT angiography were acquired to evaluate the feasibility of C3PS placement. C1 lateral mass and C3PS constructs were used for atlantoaxial stabilization. The "medial sliding technique" was introduced to facilitate C3PS insertion. Clinical outcomes and complications were evaluated, and screw accuracy was graded on postoperative CT scans. Morphological measurements showed that more than 80% C3 pedicles could accommodate a 3.5-mm screw. Fifty-eight C3PSs were placed in 33/37 patients using the medial sliding technique. Overall, 96.7% screws were considered safe and there was no related neurovascular complications; 27/33 patients exhibited neurological improvement and 30/33 patients had a solid bone fusion at an average 19.3-month follow-up. Therefore, the C3PS was a feasible option for atlantoaxial fixation in Klippel-Feil patients. The clinically efficiency of C3PS was satisfied with high fusion rates and low complications. The medial sliding technique we used could facilitate safe and accurate placement of C3PSs in Klippel-Feil patients with fused C2-3 vertebra.

Fluoroscopy-Assisted C1-C2 Posterior Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability: A Single-Center Case Series of 78 Patients

Background and Objectives: Posterior C1-C2 fixation, with trans-articular screws (TAS) or screw-rod-construct (SRC), is the main surgical technique for atlantoaxial instability, and can be performed with a fluoroscopy-assisted free-handed technique or 3D navigation. This study aimed to evaluate complications, radiological and functional outcome in patients treated with a fluoroscopy-assisted technique. Materials and Methods: A single-center consecutive cohort study was conducted of all adult patients who underwent posterior C1-C2 fixation, using TAS or CRS, between 2005-2019. Results: Seventy-eight patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 6.8 years. Trauma was the most common injury mechanism (64%), and cervicalgia the predominant preoperative symptom (88%). TAS was used in 33%, and SRC in 67% of cases. Surgery was associated with a significant reduction in cervicalgia (from 88% to 26%, p < 0.001). The most common complications were vertebral artery injury (n = 2, 2.6%), and screw malposition (n = 5, 6.7%, of which 2 were TAS and 3 were SRC). No patients deteriorated in their functional status following surgery. Conclusions: Fluoroscopy-assisted C1-C2 fixation with TAS or SRC is a safe and effective treatment for atlantoaxial instability, with a low complication rate, few surgical revisions, and pain relief in the majority of the cases.

C2 translaminar screw fixation in pediatric occipitocervical fusion

PURPOSE

Rigid occipitocervical (O-C) instrumentation can reduce the anterior pathology and has a high fusion rate in children with craniovertebral instability. Typically, axis (C2) screw fixation utilizes C1-C2 transarticular screws or C2 pars screws. However, anatomic variation may preclude these screw types due to the size of fixation elements or by placing the vertebral artery at risk for injury. Pediatric C2 translaminar screw fixation has low risk of vertebral artery injury and may be used when the anatomy is otherwise unsuitable for C1-C2 transarticular screws or C2 pars screws.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a neurosurgical database at UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland for patients who had undergone a cervical spinal fusion that utilized translaminar screws for occipitocervical instrumentation between 2002 and 2020. We then reviewed the operative records to determine the parameters of C2 screw fixations performed. Demographic and all other relevant clinical data were then recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients ranging from 2 to 18 years of age underwent O-C fusion, with a total of 43 translaminar screws at C2 placed. Twenty-three patients were fused (92%) after initial surgery with a mean follow-up of 43 months. Two patients, both with Down syndrome, had a nonunion. Another 2 patients had a superficial wound dehiscence that required wound revision. One patient died of unknown cause 7 months after surgery. One patient developed an adjacent-level kyphosis.

CONCLUSION

When performing occipitocervical instrumentation in the pediatric population, C2 translaminar screw fixation is an effective option to other methods of C2 screw fixation dependent on anatomic feasibility.

Axis screws: results and complications of a large case series

OBJECTIVE

To present the surgical results of patients who underwent axis screw instrumentation, discussing surgical nuances and complications of the techniques used.

METHODS

Retrospective case-series evaluation of patients who underwent spinal surgery with axis instrumentation using screws.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included in this study. The most common cause of mechanical instability was spinal cord trauma involving the axis (36 patients - 55.4%), followed by congenital craniocervical malformation (12 patients - 18.5%). Thirty-seven (57%) patients required concomitant C1 fusion. Bilateral axis fixation was performed in almost all cases. Twenty-three patients (35.4%) underwent bilateral laminar screws fixation; pars screws were used in twenty-two patients (33.8%), and pedicular screws were used isolated in only three patients (4.6%). In fourteen patients (21.5%), we performed a hybrid construction. There was no neurological worsening nor vertebral artery injury in this series.

CONCLUSION

Axis screw instrumentation proved to be a safe and efficient method for cervical stabilization. Laminar and pars screws were the most commonly used.

Reoperation for Symptomatic Nonunions in Atlantoaxial (C1-C2) Fusions with and without Bone Morphogenetic Protein: A Cohort of 108 Patients with >2 Years Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in atlantoaxial (C1-C2) fusions with or without bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) using data from a national spine registry and to analyze the different types of bone grafts used in the non-BMP group.

METHODS

Data from the Kaiser Permanente spine registry were used to identify patients with C1-C2 fusions with >2 years follow-up. Patient characteristics, diagnosis, operative times, length of stay, and reoperations were extracted from the registry. The data set was divided into patients with and without BMP. Further analysis was made of the different types of non-BMP grafts as well as the instrumentation used.

RESULTS

In our cohort, we found 58 patients (53.7%) with BMP and 50 patients (46.3%) without with an average follow-up time of 5 years (interquartile range, 2.04-8.49). The BMP versus non-BMP groups differed in admitting diagnosis, operative times, length of stay, and follow-up times. There were no reoperations for symptomatic nonunions in both groups. The non-BMP group included iliac crest graft (with or without allograft [+/-] allograft); lamina (+/- allograft); and allograft alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Using one of the largest retrospective studies on C1-C2 fusions with and without BMP, we found no difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions. For the non-BMP group, we found that lamina (+/- allograft) or allograft alone may also be just as effective as iliac crest graft (+/- allograft) in having no reoperations for symptomatic nonunions.

Bicortical facet screws as a new option for posterior C2 fixation: anatomical study and clinical experience

PURPOSE

C2 fixation is a demanding procedure, particularly in patients with variants of C1-C2 anatomy. The inferior articular process (IAP) of the axis can be an alternative for screw placement. We report the results of a CT study of C2 IAP anatomy and we present the clinical experience of 28 patients operated with this technique.

METHODS

Anatomical study: 50 CT angiographies of the vertebral arteries (VA) were used for this study and, therefore, 100 IAPs were considered. We measured on the axial and sagittal planes the length, height and width of the facet, the distance between the anterior cortex and the VA and the distance between the screw entry point and the VA. We also measured the angle between the sagittal plane and the external tangent line of the VA.

CLINICAL REPORT

28 patients were treated with C2 IAP screws at the Spine Surgery Department of the University Hospital in Lyon, France, from January 2014 to January 2016.

RESULTS

Anatomical study: the mean length of C2 IAP was 12 ± 2 mm, the mean distance between the anterior cortical layer and the VA was 5.2 ± 1.4 mm, and the mean angle we found was 0.2° ± 5.3°.

CLINICAL REPORT

16 of the 28 patients presented post-traumatic C1-C2 instability, 8 patients presented degenerative disease, 1 patient was treated for pseudoarthrosis, 1 for tumour, 1 for OPLL and 1 for rheumatoid arthritis. All the screws were correctly positioned and there was no VA injury.

CONCLUSION

IAP screws can represent a safe alternative option for C2 fixation.

Short isthmic versus long trans-isthmic C2 screw: anatomical and biomechanical evaluation

INTRODUCTION

The Harms technique is now considered as the gold standard to stabilize C1-C2 cervical spine. It has been reported to decrease the risk of vertebral artery injury. However, the risk of vascular injury does not totally disappear, particularly due to the proximity of the trans-isthmic C2 screw with the foramen transversarium of C2. In order to decrease this risk of vertebral artery injury, it has been proposed to use a shorter screw which stops before the foramen transversarium.

OBJECT

The main objective was to compare the pull-out strength of long trans-isthmic screw (LS) versus short isthmic screw (SS) C2 screw. An additional morphological study was also performed.

METHOD

Thirteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines were included in the study. Orientation, width and height of the isthmus of C2 were measured on CT scan. Then, 3.5-mm titanium screws were inserted in C2 isthmus according to the Harms technique. Each specimen received a LS and a SS. The side and the order of placement were determined with a randomization table. Pull-out strengths and stiffness were evaluated with a testing machine, and paired samples were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and also the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The mean isthmus transversal orientation was 20° ± 6°. The mean width of C2 isthmus was less than 3.5 mm in 35 % of the cases. The mean pull-out strength for LS was 340 ± 85 versus 213 ± 104 N for SS (p = 0.004). The mean stiffness for the LS was 144 ± 40 and 97 ± 54 N/mm for the SS (p = 0.02).

DISCUSSION

The pull-out strength of trans-isthmic C2 screws was significantly higher (60 % additional pull-out resistance) than SSs. Although associated with an inferior resistance, SSs may be used in case of narrow isthmus which contraindicates 3.5-mm screw insertion but does not represent the first option for C2 instrumentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Hydrocephalus Caused by Fat Embolism: A Rare Complication of Atlanto-Axial Fixation for Odontoid Fractures

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Odontoid fracture is not uncommon and surgical treatment that uses posterior screw/rod fixation is an acceptable option. This is the first report of delayed hydrocephalus due to subarachnoid fat migration as a complication of posterior atlanto-axial (AA) fixation.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 27-year-old man underwent posterior C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw fixation for a recent Anderson-D'Alonzo type 2 odontoid fracture. Autologous bone graft was wired for onlay fusion. The surgery was smooth, except that there was an incidental durotomy intraoperatively. The patient had significant relief of his neck pain, although computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a medial breach of the left C1 screw postoperation; however, he gradually developed headache and dizziness after discharge. Five weeks after operation, magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a large pseudo-meningocele at the surgical site, which was managed conservatively. Nine weeks after the AA fixation, the patient was sent to the emergency department for altered consciousness. A brain CT demonstrated hydrocephalus and multiple fat emboli in the subarachnoid and intraventricular space. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt was inserted to manage the hydrocephalus and pseudo-meningocele. The patient recovered well and was followed up to 13 months after operation. To date, this was the first report of delayed hydrocephalus caused by fat embolism after AA fixation surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental durotomy in posterior AA fixation may predispose the patient to a serious complication of fat-cerebrospinal fluid embolism and subsequent hydrocephalus. There should be a heightened awareness for such a complication. Both CT and magnetic resonance imaging are useful for the diagnosis of subarachnoid fat droplets.

Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: a review of all techniques

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Posterior atlantoaxial fixation is an effective treatment for atlantoaxial instability. Great advancements on posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques have been made in the past decades. However, there is no article reviewing all the posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques yet.

PURPOSE

The aim was to review the evolution and advancements of posterior atlantoaxial fixation.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a literature review.

METHODS

The application of all posterior fixation techniques in atlantoaxial stabilization, including wiring techniques, interlaminar clamp fixation, transarticular fixation, screw-plate systems, screw-rod systems, and hook-screw systems, are reviewed and discussed. Recent advancements on the novel technique of atlantoaxial fixation are described. The combination of the C1 and C2 screws in screw-rod systems are described in detail.

RESULTS

All fixation techniques are useful. The screw-rod system appears to be the most popular approach. However, many novel or modified fixation methods have been introduced in recent years.

CONCLUSIONS

Great advancements on posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques have been made in the past decades. The wiring technique and interlaminar clamps technique have fallen out of favor because of the development of newer and superior fixation techniques. The C1-C2 transarticular screw technique may remain the gold standard for atlantoaxial fusion, whereas screw-rod systems, especially the C1 pedicle screw combined with C2 pedicle/pars screw fixation, have become the most popular fixation techniques. Hook-screw systems are alternatives for atlantoaxial fixation.

Biomechanical analysis of screw constructs for atlantoaxial fixation in cadavers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECT

The unique and complex biomechanics of the atlantoaxial junction make the treatment of C1–2 instability a challenge. Several screw-based constructs have been developed for atlantoaxial fixation. The biomechanical properties of these constructs have been assessed in numerous cadaver studies. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the biomechanical stability achieved using various C1–2 screw constructs and to perform a meta-analysis of the available data.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed through July 1, 2013, was conducted using the following key words and Boolean operators: “atlanto [all fields]” AND “axial [all fields]” OR “C1–C2” AND “biomechanic.” Cadaveric studies on atlantoaxial fixation using screw constructs were included. Data were collected on instability models, fixation techniques, and range of motion (ROM). Forest plots were constructed to summarize the data and compare the biomechanical stability achieved.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. An average (± SD) of 7.4 ± 1.8 cadaveric specimens were used in each study (range 5–12). The most common injury models were odontoidectomy (53.3%) and cervical ligament transection (26.7%). The most common spinal motion segments potted for motion analysis were occiput–C4 (46.7%) and occiput–C3 (33.3%). Four screw constructs (C1 lateral mass–C2 pedicle screw [C1LM–C2PS], C1–2 transarticular screw [C1–C2TA], C1 lateral mass–C2 translaminar screw [C1LM-C2TL], and C1 lateral mass–C2 pars screw [C1LM–C2 pars]) were assessed for biomechanical stability in axial rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral bending, for a total of 12 analyses. The C1LM–C2TL construct did not achieve significant lateral bending stabilization (p = 0.70). All the other analyses showed significant stabilization (p < 0.001 for each analysis). Significant heterogeneity was found among the reported stabilities achieved in the analyses (p < 0.001; I2 > 80% for all significant analyses). The C1LM–C2 pars construct achieved significantly less axial rotation stability (average ROM 36.27° [95% CI 34.22°–38.33°]) than the 3 other constructs (p < 0.001; C1LM–C2PS average ROM 49.26° [95% CI 47.66°–50.87°], C1–C2TA average ROM 47.63° [95% CI 45.22°–50.04°], and C1LM–C2TL average ROM 53.26° [95% CI 49.91°–56.61°]) and significantly more flexion/extension stability (average ROM 13.45° [95% CI 10.53°–16.37°]) than the 3 other constructs (p < 0.001; C1LM–C2PS average ROM 9.02° [95% CI 8.25°–9.80°], C1–C2TA average ROM 7.39° [95% CI 5.60°–9.17°], and C1LM–C2TL average ROM 7.81° [95% CI 6.93°–8.69°]). The C1–C2TA (average ROM 5.49° [95% CI 3.89°–7.09°]) and C1LM–C2 pars (average ROM 4.21° [95% CI 2.19°–6.24°]) constructs achieved significantly more lateral bending stability than the other constructs (p < 0.001; C1LM–C2PS average ROM 1.51° [95% CI 1.23°–1.78°]; C1LM–C2TL average ROM −0.07° [95% CI −0.44° to 0.29°]).

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis of the existing literature showed that all constructs provided significant stabilization in all axes of rotation, except for the C1LM–C2TL construct in lateral bending. There were significant differences in stabilization achieved in each axis of motion by the various screw constructs. These results underline the various strengths and weaknesses in biomechanical stabilization of different screw constructs. There was significant heterogeneity in the data reported across the studies. Standardized spinal motion segment configuration and injury models may provide more consistent and reliable results.

Endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy without resection of nasal turbinates: clinical outcomes of 13 patients

Object The goal of the study was to report a series of consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy (ETO) without resection of nasal turbinates. The techniques for this minimally invasive approach are described in detail. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent ETO for basilar invagination. All the patients had myelopathy caused by compression at the cervicomedullary junction, which required surgical decompression. Preoperative and postoperative data, including those from radiographic and clinical evaluations, were compared. Morbidity and mortality rates for the procedure are also reported in detail. Results Thirteen patients (6 men and 7 women) with a mean age of 52.7 years (range 24-72 years) were enrolled. The basilar invagination etiologies were rheumatoid arthritis (n = 5), trauma (n = 4), os odontoideum (n = 2), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 1), and postinfectious deformity (n = 1). The average follow-up duration was 51.2 months (range 0.3-105 months). One patient died 10 days after the operation as a result of meningitis caused by CSF leakage. Among the other 12 patients, the average postoperative Nurick grade (3.2) was significantly improved over that before the operation (4.1, p = 0.004). The mean (± SD) duration of postoperative intubation was 1.5 ± 2.1 days, and there was no need for perioperative tracheostomy or nasogastric tube feeding. There also was no postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency. There were 6 (46%) intraoperative and 2 (15%) postoperative CSF leaks in the 13 patients in this series. Conclusions ETO is a viable and effective option for decompression at the ventral cervicomedullary junction. This approach is minimally invasive and causes little velopharyngeal insufficiency. The pitfall of this approach is the difficulty in repairing dural defects and subsequent CSF leakage.

Indirect decompression for a prior severe C1–2 dislocation causing progressive quadriparesis

Combined anterior and posterior surgery is frequently chosen for the treatment of prior, severe C1–2 dislocations that occurred during early childhood because of the difficulty in achieving reduction and satisfactory decompression. The authors treated a prior, severe C1–2 dislocation that was causing progressive quadriparesis. The patient was a 14-year-old boy who had suffered a C1–2 fracture-dislocation at 3 years of age and had been treated with a Minerva body jacket cast. The treatment involved posterior C1–2 segmental screw fixation, without direct bone decompression or additional surgery. Satisfactory neural decompression was achieved with the techniques used, and complete bone union was confirmed. The patient showed satisfactory neurological recovery at the 5-year follow-up assessment.

Risk to the vertebral artery during C-2 translaminar screw placement: a thin-cut computerized tomography angiogram-based morphometric analysis: clinical article

OBJECT

The goal of this study was to characterize the anatomy relevant to placement of crossing C-2 translaminar screws, including morphometric data, and to evaluate the risk of violating the vertebral artery (VA) during the screw placement. Placement of bilateral crossing C-2 translaminar screws has become an increasingly popular method for dorsal C-2 instrumentation as it is felt to avoid the known risk of VA injury associated with C1-2 transarticular screw fixation and C-1 lateral mass-C-2 pars screw fixation.

METHODS

The source images from 50 CT angiograms of the neck obtained from October to November 2007 were studied. Digital imaging software was used to measure lamina thickness and maximum screw length, perform angulation of screw trajectories in the axial plane, and evaluate the potential for VA injury. In cases where the VA could be injured, the distance between the maximal screw length and artery was measured. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate lamina width, axial angle, and screw length for predicting the potential for VA injury.

RESULTS

Mean lamina thickness, axial angle, and maximal screw length were determined for 100 laminae, and a potential for VA injury was noted in 55 laminae. The anatomically defined ideal screw length was longer in laminae with potential for VA injury than in laminae with no apparent risk (35.2 vs 33.6 mm, p = 0.0131). Only increasing optimal screw length was noted to be a statistically significant predictor of potential VA injury (p = 0.0159). The "buffer zone" (the distance between an optimally placed screw and the VA) was 5.6 ± 1.9 mm (mean ± SD, range 1.8-11.4 mm). A screw limited to 28 mm in length appeared to be safe in all laminae studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Crossing C-2 translaminar screws have been reported to be safe and effective. In addition to morphometric characteristics, the authors have found that screws placed in this trajectory could jeopardize the vertebral arteries in the foramen transversarium or the C1-2 interval. A C-2 translaminar screw limited to 28 mm in length appeared to be safe in all 100 screw trajectories studied in this series.

Axis instrumentation: surgical results

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the surgical results of axis screw instrumentation. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of the clinical and radiological data of patients submitted to axis fixation using screws. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were surgically treated. The mean age was 41.8 years (range: 12-73). Spinal cord trauma was the most common cause of instability (8 patients - 47%). Bilateral axis fixation was performed in all cases, except one, with laminar screw (total of 33 axis screws). Seven patients (41.1%) underwent bilateral pars screws; laminar screws were used in six cases and pedicular screws were used in two. In two cases, we performed a hybrid construction (laminar + pars and pedicle + pars). There was no neurological worsening or death, nor complications directly related to use axis screws. CONCLUSION: Axis instrumentation was effective and safe, regardless of the technique used for stabilization. Based on our learnt experience, we proposed an algorithm to choose the best technique for axis screw fixation.