Impact of deep brain stimulation therapy on the vertebral sagittal balance in Parkinson's disease patients

Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by cardinal motor signs: 4-6 Hz resting tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia. In addition, 3-18% of PD patients have camptocormia, an abnormal forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine, which may have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Different possible treatments have been suggested for such a condition, but no one is resolutive. This study aims to define the possible impact of DBS, with selective targeting on the dorsal-lateral region of the STN, on the sagittal balance of patients affected by PD. Among all patients that have undergone DBS procedures in our institution, we selected eight subjects, four females and four males, with selective targeting on the dorsal-lateral region of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) because of camptocormia and other severe postural changes. Radiological assessments of spinal balance parameters before surgery and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively were carried out. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative spine X-ray data showed a statistically significant improvement in dorsal kyphosis angle (D-Cobb) 12 months after the operation. Deep brain stimulation with selective targeting of the dorsal lateral part of the STN may induce changes of the posture in patients with Parkinson's disease 12 months after the operation, which appears to improve in this small sample size, but larger observational and controlled trials would be required to confirm this observation.

A noninvasive method to quantify the impairment of spinal motion ability in Parkinson's disease

PURPOSE

There is a high demand on spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) but the results are sobering. Although detailed clinical and radiological diagnostics were carried out with great effort and expense, the biodynamic properties of the spine of PD patients have never been considered. We propose a noninvasive method to quantify the impairment of motion abilities in patients with PD.

METHODS

We present an analytical cross-sectional study of 21 patients with severe PD. All patients underwent a biodynamic assessment during a standardized movement-choreography. Thus, individual spinal motion profiles of each patient were objectively assessed and compared with a large comparative cohort of individuals without PD. Moreover, clinical scores to quantify motor function and lumbar back pain were collected and X-ray scans of the spine in standing position were taken and analysed.

RESULTS

Biodynamic measurement showed that 36.9% of the assessed motions of all PD patients were severely impaired. Men were generally more functionally impaired than women, in 52% of all motion parameters. The neurological and radiological diagnostics recorded pathological values, of which UPDRS-III ON correlated with findings of the biodynamics assessment (R = 0.52, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to operate on a PD patient's spine is far-reaching and requires careful consideration. Neurological and radiological scores did not correlate with the biodynamics of the spine. The resulting motion profile could be used as individual predictive factor to estimate whether patients are eligible for spinal surgery or alternative therapies.

Thoracolumbar Instrumentation Surgery in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

 With increasing prevalence of Parkinson's disease (PD), instrumentation surgery of the thoracolumbar spine of PD patients grows in importance. Poor operative results with high rates of revision surgery have been reported. The goal of this study was to compare the biomechanical complications of thoracolumbar instrumentation surgery of patients with and without PD.

METHODS

 In a retrospective case-control study, we compared 16 PD patients with a matched cohort of 104 control patients regarding the following postinstrumentation complications: (1) adjacent joint disease, (2) material failure, and (3) material loosening. Also, we compared the spinal bone density, which is the main prognostic criteria for failed instrumentation surgery, between the groups.

RESULTS

 We found the rate of material revision to be significantly higher in PD patients (43.8 vs. 13.5%, p = 0.008, odds ratio (OR) = 5.0). Furthermore, the indications for revision surgery differed between the groups, with more hardware failures in the PD group and more adjacent segment degeneration in the control group. PD patients profited from modern operation techniques (percutaneous instrumentation and CT-navigated screw implantation). Hospitalization was significantly longer for PD patients (20.2 ± 15.1 vs. 14.1 ± 8.9 days, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

 PD patients exhibit challenging biomechanical demands on instrumenting the spine. Besides osteoporosis, especially sagittal imbalance, gait disturbance, and altered muscle tone may be contributive. PD patients may particularly profit from navigated and less invasive surgical techniques.

Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease-related postural abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a well-established treatment modality for Parkinson's disease (PD), especially regarding motor fluctuations, dyskinesias, and tremor. Although postural abnormalities (i.e., Camptocormia [CC] and Pisa syndrome [Pisa]) are known to be a major symptom of PD as well, the influence of DBS on postural abnormalities is unclear. The objective of this study is to analyze the existing literature regarding DBS for PD-associated postural abnormalities in a systematic review and meta-analysis. In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 studies that reported the effect of DBS regarding postural abnormalities. After screening of 53 studies, a total of 98 patients (44 female, 53 males, 1 not reported; mean age: 62.3, range 30-83 years) with postural abnormalities (CC n = 98; Pisa n = 11) were analyzed from 18 included studies. Of those patients, 94.9% underwent STN-DBS and 5.1% had GPi as DBS target area. A positive outcome was reported for 67.8% with CC and 72.2% with Pisa. In the meta-analysis, younger age and lower pre-operative UPDRS-III (ON/OFF) were found as positive predictive factors for a positive effect of DBS. DBS might be a potentially effective treatment option for PD-associated postural abnormalities. However, the level of evidence is rather low, and definition of postoperative outcome is heterogenous between studies. Therefore larger, prospective trials are necessary to give a clear recommendation.

Spinal Surgery after Bilateral Subthalamic Stimulation for Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Outcome Analysis of Pain and Functional Control

Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients often suffer from spinal diseases requiring surgeries, although the risk of complications is high. There are few reports on outcomes after spinal surgery for PD patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS). The objective of this study was to explore the data on spinal surgery for PD patients with precedent DBS. We evaluated 24 consecutive PD patients with 28 spinal surgeries from 2007 to 2017 who received at least a 2-year follow-up. The characteristics and outcomes of PD patients after spinal surgery were compared to those of 156 non-PD patients with degenerative spinal diseases treated in 2013–2017. Then, the characteristics, outcomes, and spinal alignment of PD patients receiving DBS were analyzed in degenerative spinal/lumbar diseases. The mean age at the time of spinal surgery was 68 years. The Hoehn and Yahr score regarding PD was stage 1 for 8 patients, stage 2 for 2 patients, stage 3 for 8 patients, stage 4 for 10 patients, and stage 5 for 0 patient. The median preoperative L-DOPA equivalent daily dose was 410 mg. Thirteen patients (46%) received precedent subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. Lumbar lesions with pain were common, and operation and anesthesia times were long in PD patients. Pain and functional improvement of PD patients persisted for 2 years after surgery with a higher complication rate than for non-PD patients. PD patients with STN DBS maintained better lumbar lordosis for 2 years after spinal surgery. STN DBS significantly maintained spinal alignment with subsequent pain and functional amelioration 2 years after surgery. The outcomes of spinal surgery for PD patients might be favorably affected by thorough treatment for PD including DBS.

Surgical Management of Post-Radiation, Dropped Head Spinal Deformity in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Dropped head syndrome is a morbid condition, which affects daily functionality, causing pain and dysphagia and respiratory compromise. Reported causes of dropped head syndrome include neuromuscular disorders, iatrogenic from cervical spine surgery, idiopathic and post-radiation for head and neck cancers. Management of this spinal disorder remains challenging, as the complication rates are high. We present our series of 7 patients who underwent surgical correction of dropped head syndrome, all resulting from radiation for head and neck cancers.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 7 patients who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2019 for dropped head syndrome secondary to post-radiation cervical spine deformity. Clinical variables were obtained from medical records. Radiographic parameters pre- and post-surgery including T1 slope, sagittal vertical axis, and C2-7 cervical lordosis were examined.

RESULTS

Seven patients were included in the study, with an average age 69 years. Two patients underwent traction pre-operatively. Five patients had posterior fixation and fusion only and two patients had a combined anterior and posterior fixation and fusion. Overall, there was improvement in average pre/post-op SVA (6.96cm to 3.04cm), T1 slope (33.61^o to 24.34^o) and C2-7 lordosis (-21.65^o to -0.03^o).

CONCLUSION

Surgical correction of post-radiation dropped head spinal deformity involving anterior and posterior fixation with osteotomies provides improvement in functional and radiographic outcomes as shown in our series. These cases are technically challenging and have a high rate of peri-operative complications. Approaches must be tailored to the patient with attention to their specific surgical and radiation history.

Spinal Surgery for Parkinson Disease With Camptocormia: Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study With Degenerative Sagittal Imbalance (DSI)

STUDY DESIGN

A propensity score-matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the radiologic and clinical outcomes of camptocormia in Parkinson disease (PD) with degenerative sagittal imbalance (DSI) patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Camptocormia in PD and DSI could be characterized by a dynamic deformity. However, no study has directly evaluated the outcomes of patients with camptocormia and DSI.

METHODS

Thirteen consecutive PD patients undergoing surgical correction for camptocormia were matched in a 1-to-2 format with 26 patients in the DSI group by propensity score-matching. Radiologic outcomes, including paravertebral muscle changes, and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. The rate of proximal junctional problems and reoperations were assessed.

RESULTS

PD patients with camptocormia had significantly greater preoperative coronal and sagittal malalignments (29.9 vs. 16.9 mm, P=0.019; 142.8 vs. 64.4 mm, P=0.0001, respectively) and weakness of paravertebral muscles compared with the DSI patients. Regarding the clinical outcomes, reoperations were significantly higher in the camptocormia group, compared with the DSI group (53.8% vs. 7.7%, P=0.001). Moreover, proximal junctional failure was developed in 8 patients in the camptocormia group, while 1 patient in the DSI group (61.5% vs. 3.8%, P=0.0001). In subgroup analysis, independent risk factors for the proximal junctional failure were the total fusion levels (hazard ratio=0.26, P=0.018) and the degree of fatty changes of the paravertebral muscles (hazard ratio=1.15, P=0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

PD patients undergoing spinal surgery for camptocormia had global malalignment and higher rates of complications compared with DSI patients. Patients should be appropriately counseled regarding the increased risk of operative complications and closely followed for incipient failure.

Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Patients With Movement Disorders: A Propensity-matched Analysis of Outcomes and Cost

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study using national administrative data from the MarketScan database.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the complication rates, quality outcomes, and costs in a nationwide cohort of patients with movement disorders (MD) who undergo spinal deformity surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients with MD often present with spinal deformities, but their tolerance for surgical intervention is unknown.

METHODS

The MarketScan administrative claims database was queried to identify adult patients with MD who underwent spinal deformity surgery. A propensity-score match was conducted to create two uniform cohorts and mitigate interpopulation confounders. Perioperative complication rates, 90-day postoperative outcomes, and total costs were compared between patients with MD and controls.

RESULTS

A total of 316 patients with MD (1.7%) were identified from the 18,970 undergoing spinal deformity surgery. The complication rate for MD patients was 44.6% and for the controls 35.6% (P = 0.009). The two most common perioperative complications were more likely to occur in MD patients, acute-posthemorrhagic anemia (26.9% vs. 20.8%, P < 0.05) and deficiency anemia (15.5% vs. 8.5%, P < 0.05). At 90 days, MD patients were more likely to be readmitted (17.4% vs. 13.2%, P < 0.05) and have a higher total cost ($94,672 vs. $85,190, P < 0.05). After propensity-score match, the overall complication rate remained higher in the MD group (44.6% vs. 37.6%, P < 0.05). 90-day readmissions and costs also remained significantly higher in the MD cohort. Multivariate modeling revealed MD was an independent predictor of postoperative complication and inpatient readmission. Subgroup analysis revealed that Parkinson disease was an independent predictor of inpatient readmission, reoperation, and increased length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Patients with MD who undergo spinal deformity surgery may be at risk of higher rate of perioperative complications and 90-day readmissions compared with patients without these disorders.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Extensive Spinal Fusion Surgery in Patients With Parkinson Disease or Atypical Parkinsonism: Time Course of Clinical Outcomes in 5 Years Progress Report

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the mid-term results of extensive spinal fusion surgery in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) or atypical Parkinsonism, especially with respect to their activities of daily living (ADL) over time SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Postural disorders associated with PD lead to spinal imbalance and deformity, resulting in significant disabilities. Clinical outcomes of extensive fusion surgeries in patients with PD over a medium-term follow-up period are currently unknown.

METHODS

Patients with PD who underwent extensive fusion surgery more than 5 years prior were included. The patients' backgrounds, surgical and radiographic parameters, perioperative and mechanical complications, and indoor ADL over time were assessed. To assess the activities of severely disabled patients, indoor ADL was classified into four stages: independent; or cane, walker, and wheelchair use.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (mean age, 70.6 yrs) were included. The mean blood loss, duration of surgery, and fusion levels were 2039 mL, 424 minutes, and 11.9 levels, respectively. Sagittal vertical axis improved from 220 mm preoperatively to 95 mm postoperatively. Perioperative complications were observed in 17 cases (77%). Before surgery, 1, 5, 12, and four cases were independent in ADL, T-cane, walker, and wheelchair use, respectively, which improved to seven, four, six, and four, respectively in 1 year. Revision surgeries were performed in eight patients (36%) within 3 years of surgery. In the 3 to 5 years after the surgery, the ADL of nine patients worsened due to deterioration of PD. Fifteen cases were followed up over 5 years, at which one, two, four, and seven cases were independent in ADL, cane, walker, and wheelchair use, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Surgical intervention in PD patients with spinal deformities leads to good short-term outcomes; however, the patients' conditions deteriorated because of complications within 3 years and worsening of PD over 3 years after the surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Spinal Fusion in Parkinson's Disease Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis With Minimum 2-Year Surveillance

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes and complication rates between patients with and without Parkinson's disease (PD) patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is limited literature evaluating the impact of PD on long-term outcomes after thoracolumbar fusion surgery for ASD.

METHODS

Patients admitted from 2009 to 2011 with diagnoses of ASD who underwent any thoracolumbar fusion procedure with a minimum 2-year follow-up surveillance were retrospectively reviewed using New York State's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. A 1:1 propensity score-match by age, Deyo score, and number of fused vertebral levels was conducted before comparing surgical outcomes of patients with ASD with and without PD. Univariate analysis compared demographics, complications, and subsequent revision. Multivariate binary stepwise logistic regression models identified independent predictors of these outcomes (covariates: age, sex, Deyo Index score, and PD diagnosis).

RESULTS

A total of 576 propensity score-matched patients were identified (PD: n = 288; no-PD: n = 288), with a mean age of 69.7 years (PD) and 70.2 years (no-PD). Each cohort had comparable distributions of age, sex, race, insurance provider, Deyo score, and number of levels fused (all P > 0.05). Patients with PD incurred higher total charges across ASD surgery-related visits ($187,807 vs. $126,610, P < 0.001), yet rates of medical complications (35.8% PD vs. 34.0% no-PD, P = 0.662) and revision surgery (12.2% vs. 10.8%, P > 0.05) were comparable. Postoperative mortality rates were comparable between PD and no-PD cohorts (2.8% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.243). Logistic regression identified nine-level or higher spinal fusion as a significant predictor for an increase in total complications (odds ratio = 5.64); PD was not associated with increased odds of any adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Aside from higher hospital charges incurred, patients with PD experienced comparable overall complication and revision rates to a propensity score-matched patient cohort without PD from the general population undergoing thoracolumbar fusion surgery. These results can support management of concerns and postoperative expectations in this patient cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Hand, foot, and spine deformities in parkinsonian disorders

Hand and foot deformities, known as "striatal deformities", and other musculoskeletal abnormalities such as dropped head, bent spine, camptocormia, scoliosis and Pisa syndrome, are poorly understood and often misdiagnosed features of Parkinson's disease and other parkinsonian syndromes. These deformities share some similarities with known rheumatologic conditions and can be wrongly diagnosed as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, Dupuytren's contracture, trigger finger, or other rheumatologic or orthopedic conditions. Neurologists, rheumatologists, and other physicians must be familiar with these deformities to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary diagnostic tests, and to recommend appropriate treatment options.

Etiology and Management of Spinal Deformity in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) commonly develop severe spinal deformity, including scoliosis, antecollis, camptocormia, and Pisa syndrome. The etiology of PD-associated spinal deformity is not completely understood and in most cases is likely due to multiple interrelated factors, including central dystonia and focal myopathy. Once spinal deformity has occurred, surgery is often the only modality that can correct the condition, although control of the movement disorder through medication and deep brain stimulation may slow progression. Advances in spinal instrumentation and deformity correction techniques have improved the outcomes of PD spinal deformity patients, though complications and revision surgery rates remain high. Surgical intervention is reserved for individuals who are physiologically healthy and whose condition is refractory to nonoperative management and follows similar treatment principles as other causes of neuromuscular scoliosis/kyphosis. Spinal deformity patients with PD are optimally treated by spinal deformity surgeons who are familiar with the unique needs of PD patients, with vigilant preoperative and postoperative treatment of their movement disorder and bone density.

Inpatient morbidity after spinal deformity surgery in patients with movement disorders

Background

To investigate the inpatient perioperative morbidity rate of patients with movement disorders (MD) after spinal deformity surgery.

Methods

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2002 to 2011 was queried to identify adult patients with MD who underwent spinal deformity surgery. Complication rates were compared between patients with MD and controls. A multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the effect of MD on outcome.

Results

A total of 365 patients with MD (3.3%) were identified among 11,043 patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformity. Patients with MD were on average 8 years older than the control group (67 vs. 59 years of age, P<0.001). The complication rate was 55.1% for patients with MD and 43.7% for patients without MD (P<0.001). The most common complication was acute post-hemorrhagic anemia, which occurred in 31.9% of all patients (41.6% in MD patients and 31.5% in the control group, P<0.001). Other complications that were more common in patients with MD included delirium (P<0.001), acute kidney injury (P=0.032), and pulmonary embolism (P=0.014). After controlling for patient age, sex, osteoporosis, complex procedures, fusion to the lumbosacral spine, use of bone morphogenetic protein, and use of blood transfusion, patients with MD were 1.3 times more likely to develop a complication compared to patients without MD [odds ratio (OR), 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.59; P=0.032] on multiple logistic regression analysis. No significant difference in hospital stay was observed.

Conclusions

Patients with MD who undergo spinal deformity surgery may be at risk of higher rate of complications compared to patients without these disorders.

Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease: An integrated approach from pathophysiology to management

Pisa syndrome was first described in 1972 in patients treated with neuroleptics. Since 2003, when it was first reported in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), Pisa syndrome has progressively drawn the attention of clinicians and researchers. Although emerging evidence has partially clarified its prevalence and pathophysiology, the current debate revolves around diagnostic criteria and assessment and the effectiveness of pharmacological, surgical, and rehabilitative approaches. Contrary to initial thought, Pisa syndrome is common among PD patients, with an estimated prevalence of 8.8% according to a large survey. Furthermore, it is associated with the following specific patient features: more severe motor phenotype, ongoing combined pharmacological treatment with levodopa and dopamine agonists, gait disorders, and such comorbidities as osteoporosis and arthrosis. The present literature on treatment outcomes is scant, and the uneven effectiveness of specific treatments has produced conflicting results. This might be because of the limited knowledge of Pisa syndrome pathophysiology and its variable clinical presentation, which further complicates designing randomized clinical trials on this condition. However, because some forms of Pisa syndrome are potentially reversible, there is growing consensus on the importance of its early recognition and the importance of pharmacological adjustment and rehabilitation. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Elective Thoracolumbar Spine Fusion Surgery in Patients with Parkinson Disease

OBJECTIVE

Few data are available concerning clinical outcomes in patients with Parkinson disease who undergo elective thoracolumbar spine fusion surgery. The goal of this study is to elucidate complication and revision rates after posterior thoracolumbar fusion surgery in patients with Parkinson disease, with a focus on how Parkinson disease modifies these rates.

METHODS

The PearlDiver database (2005-2012) was queried for patients who underwent posterior approach thoracolumbar fusion from 2006 to 2011. Cohorts of patients with a previous diagnosis of Parkinson disease (n = 4816) and without (n = 280,702) were compared. Multivariate analysis that included various comorbidities and demographics was used to calculate effects of Parkinson disease on development of postoperative infection and major medical complications within 90 days and revision surgery within 1 year. For analyses, significance was set at P < 0.001.

RESULTS

Major medical complications were observed in 545 patients (11.3%) for 90 days after the index procedure. Postoperative infection was noted in 91 patients (1.9%) within 90 days, and revision surgeries were performed in 250 patients (5.2%) within 1 year. Multivariate analysis showed that Parkinson disease was significantly associated with an increased risk for medical complications (adjusted odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.34; P < 0.001) and revision surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-1.93; P < 0.001), but not postoperative infection (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Parkinson disease are more likely to require revision surgery and have higher rates of adverse medical events postoperatively. Patients with Parkinson disease should be appropriately selected to ensure favorable clinical outcomes.

Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism: clinical features, pathophysiology, and treatment

Pisa syndrome is defined as a reversible lateral bending of the trunk with a tendency to lean to one side. It is a frequent and often disabling complication of Parkinson's disease, and has also been described in several atypical forms of parkinsonism and in neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders after drug exposure and surgical procedures. Although no consistent diagnostic criteria for Pisa syndrome are available, most investigations have adopted an arbitrary cutoff of at least 10° of lateral flexion for the diagnosis of the syndrome. Pathophysiological mechanisms underlying Pisa syndrome have not been fully explained. One hypothesis emphasises central mechanisms, whereby Pisa syndrome is thought to be caused by alterations in sensory-motor integration pathways; by contrast, a peripheral hypothesis emphasises the role of anatomical changes in the musculoskeletal system. Furthermore, several drugs are reported to induce Pisa syndrome, including antiparkinsonian drugs. As Pisa syndrome might be reversible, clinicians need to be able to recognise this condition early to enable prompt management. Nevertheless, further research is needed to determine optimum treatment strategies.

Pathophysiological Concepts and Treatment of Camptocormia

Camptocormia is a disabling pathological, non-fixed, forward bending of the trunk. The clinical definition using only the bending angle is insufficient; it should include the subjectively perceived inability to stand upright, occurrence of back pain, typical individual complaints, and need for walking aids and compensatory signs (e.g. back-swept wing sign). Due to the heterogeneous etiologies of camptocormia a broad diagnostic approach is necessary. Camptocormia is most frequently encountered in movement disorders (PD and dystonia) and muscles diseases (myositis and myopathy, mainly facio-scapulo-humeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD)). The main diagnostic aim is to discover the etiology by looking for signs of the underlying disease in the neurological examination, EMG, muscle MRI and possibly biopsy. PD and probably myositic camptocormia can be divided into an acute and a chronic stage according to the duration of camptocormia and the findings in the short time inversion recovery (STIR) and T1 sequences of paravertebral muscle MRI. There is no established treatment of camptocormia resulting from any etiology. Case series suggest that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is effective in the acute but not the chronic stage of PD camptocormia. In chronic stages with degenerated muscles, treatment options are limited to orthoses, walking aids, physiotherapy and pain therapy. In acute myositic camptocormia an escalation strategy with different immunosuppressive drugs is recommended. In dystonic camptocormia, as in dystonia in general, case reports have shown botulinum toxin and DBS of the globus pallidus internus (GPi-DBS) to be effective. Camptocormia in connection with primary myopathies should be treated according to the underlying illness.