Analysis of Vacuum-Assisted Closure-Assisted Antibiotic Irrigation in Treatment of Severe Neurosurgical Central Nervous System Infections

Objective: Severe neurosurgical central nervous system infections (sNCNSIs) are among the most serious complications of neurosurgical disease. Conventional methods have shown a poor prognosis. This study aims to analyze the clinical characteristics of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in sNCNSIs with the help of antibiotic irrigation treatment. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was performed for patients diagnosed with sNCNSIs. A VAC device was placed on the incision after debridement and the surgical cavity was rinsed with antibiotic agents in the VAC group. Meanwhile the surgical cavity was drained after debridement in the control group. Medical data were reviewed and analyzed. Results: Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria, including 18 cases in the VAC group and 10 cases in the control group. The basic medical data showed no differences. Bacteria was isolated from 24 (85.7%) patients. The cure rate was significantly higher in the VAC group (p < 0.05). The cure rate in patients with multi-drug-resistant (MDR) infections was significantly higher in patients treated with VAC therapy (p < 0.05). The prognosis evaluated by Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) between the two groups showed significant difference (p < 0.05). No re-infection in the VAC group occurred in the follow-up period. Conclusions: It is suggested that VAC-assisted antibiotic irrigation is safe and effective for patients with severe NCNSIs and can improve the prognosis dramatically. The results can provide a new effective and reasonable therapeutic strategy for patients with sNCNSIs.

Complex Multidisciplinary Cranial and Scalp Reconstruction for Patient Salvage

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Patients can develop scalp and cranial defects as a result of neoplasm, trauma, or infection. Reconstruction of these defects can be difficult in some patients and may require a multidisciplinary approach using creative solutions usually used for disease processes in other areas of the body, such as severe burns.

METHODS

A series of 9 patients were treated using multidisciplinary techniques for reconstruction of complex cranial and scalp defects. Data on patient characteristics, initial treatment, and preparatory and definitive reconstructive treatment were retrospectively collected. Outcomes were measured as full solution, partial solution, or failure.

RESULTS

Three patients had a full solution/wound closure, 5 had a partial solution, and 1 failed reconstructive attempt. Full solution patients tended to be younger, received reconstruction treatment modalities for longer periods of time, and had more definitive surgeries. Initial and preparatory surgeries did not tend to promote a full solution, though having fewer preparatory surgeries that were not related to wound vacuum-assisted closure use tended to be associated with a better outcome. Infection of the scalp or cranium did not tend to change the result.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstructive salvage of complex cranial and scalp defects takes time, so patience and earlier recognition of need for atypical reconstruction is beneficial. Patient characteristics may influence outcomes, but judicious choice of materials and techniques is more critical to patient success. Use of a multidisciplinary approach to complex cranial and scalp reconstruction is a beneficial option for many patients for whom standard reconstruction methods are not viable.