Treatment of Basilar Invagination With Klippel-Feil Syndrome: Atlantoaxial Joint Distraction and Fixation With Transoral Atlantoaxial Reduction Plate

Surgical Failure and Revision Strategy for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Retrospective Study of 109 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To classify surgical failures following atlantoaxial dislocation, present strategies for revisions, and evaluate the clinical results of revision surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

With the increase in atlantoaxial dislocation surgery, the number of surgical failures has gradually risen. However, current reports on atlantoaxial surgical revision are limited in scope. There remains a lack of summary regarding the causes of surgical failure, a detailed classification system, and no proposed strategy for revision surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 109 cases of failed surgery following atlantoaxial dislocation were classified according to the reduction immediately after surgery and the fusion status before revision. The reduction, decompression, fusion status, and outcomes following revision surgery were evaluated by x-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. The data were analyzed statistically with a paired-samples t test and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The 109 patients were classified into three categories of failure: nonreduction with nonfusion (NR-NF, 73 cases), nonreduction with fusion (NR-F, 19 cases), and reduction with nonfusion (R-NF, 17 cases). Sixty-four patients underwent anterior revision, 21 posterior revision, and 24 anteroposterior revision. Postoperative complications were the primary cause of early revisions. After revision, complete decompression was achieved in all cases, anatomical reduction in 89 cases, significant improvement of Japanese Orthopaedic Association score in 77 cases, and fusion achieved in 86 cases. Twelve cases experienced surgical complications and three underwent a second revision.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found that NR-NF was the most common type of failure following surgery for atlantoaxial dislocation. Revision strategies can be guided according to the descriptive classification of failure, and revision surgery should focus on achieving adequate reduction, appropriate fixation, and reliable fusion to optimize postsurgical outcomes.

Posterior Occipitocervical Fixation and Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy for the Treatment of Basilar Invagination with Klippel-Feil Syndrome: A Case Report

Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) is characterized by the congenital fusion of the cervical vertebrae and is sometimes accompanied by anomalies in the craniocervical junction. In basilar invagination (BI), which is a dislocation of the dens in an upper direction, compression of the brainstem and cervical cord results in neurological defects and surgery is required. A 16-year-old boy diagnosed with KFS and severe BI presented with spastic tetraplegia, opisthotonus and dyspnea. CT scans showed basilar impression, occipitalization of C1 and fusion of C2/C3. MRI showed ventral compression of the medullocervical junction. Posterior occipitocervical reduction and fusion along with decompression were performed. Paralysis gradually improved postoperatively over 3 weeks. However, severe spasticity and opisthotonus persisted and intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy was initiated. Following this, opisthotonus disappeared and spasticity of the extremities improved. Rehabilitation therapy continued by controlling the dose of ITB. Five years after the surgery, self-propelled wheelchair driving was achieved and activities of daily life improved. The treatment strategy for patients with BI and congenital anomalies remains controversial. Posterior reduction and internal fixation using instrumentation were effective techniques in this case. Spasticity control achieved through a combination of surgery and ITB treatment enabled the amelioration of therapeutic efficacy of rehabilitation and the improvement of ADL.

Modified interfacet technique using shaped autologous occipital bone mass for basilar invagination

PURPOSE

In economically undeveloped areas, surgery for basilar invagination (BI) is still a serious economic burden for people. This study introduces a modified interfacet technique for the treatment of BI using shaped autologous occipital bone mass to reduce BI and to save economical expenditure.

METHODS

The data of 6 patients with BI who underwent modified interfacet technique using shaped autologous occipital bone mass in our hospital from April 2020 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. During the operation, osteotomy at the external occipital protuberance was performed using ultrasonic osteotome, followed by interfacet release and implantation of shaped autologous occipital bone mass to complete vertical reduction. The atlantodental interval (ADI), Chamberlain's line violation (CLV), clivo-axial angle (CXA) and cervico-medullary angle (CMA) were compared before and after surgery. Additionally, we observed implant stability during the follow-up period to assess the long-term success of the modified interfacet technique.

RESULTS

The surgical procedure was successful in all six patients, with no reported incidents of vascular injury, spinal cord injury, or dural tear. Following the operation, improvements were observed in the ADI, CLV, CXA, and CMA. Throughout the follow-up period, the implants remained stable, demonstrating no complications such as bone resorption of the autologous occipital bone mass, implant fracture, or displacement.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of shaped autologous occipital bone mass in atlantoaxial interfacet bone grafting has demonstrated effectiveness and feasibility. This technique offers simplicity, ease of preparation, and cost-effectiveness, making it a viable option for treating BI.

Incidence and management of surgical site infection in the cervical spine following a transoral approach

PURPOSE

Transoral approach can accomplish ventral decompression directly. However, surgical site infection (SSI) cannot be ignored. This paper aims to review the prevalence of infection and conduct advice for the treatment of SSI in the cervical spine following the transoral approach.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with SSI after transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) surgery was performed. SSI was classified into three kinds according to the modified American CDC criteria.

RESULTS

2.9% (17/581) patients who underwent TARP surgery, experienced SSI, of which five had superficial SSI (SI), eight had deep SSI (DI), and four had organ/space SSI (O/SI). The patients with SI underwent intravenous antibiotic treatment and were ultimately cured. Among the remaining 12 patients with DI and O/SI, 11 underwent reoperation for TARP system removal and subsequently one-stage posterior occipitocervical fixation, and one patient experienced infection two months post-operatively and died without receiving treatment. Among patients who underwent revision surgery, three experienced intracranial infection due to intra-operative dural tears, and continuous lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage and intrathecal injection of antibiotics were used as effective and appropriate treatments, with outcomes of one recovery and two deaths. All patients with SSI were begun on intravenous antibiotics with conversion to oral antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of SSI was 2.9% (17/581). Adequate peri-operative preparation, early diagnosis, and appropriate treatment of SSI require further research.

Usefulness of a Three-Dimensional-Printed Model in the Treatment of Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation with Transoral Atlantoaxial Reduction Plate

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness of a 3D‐printed model for transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) surgery in the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD).

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of 23 patients (13 men, 10 women; mean age 58.17 ± 5.27 years) with IAAD who underwent TARP from January 2015 to July 2017. Patients were divided into a 3D group (12 patients) and a non‐3D group (11 patients). A preoperative simulation process was undertaken for the patients in the 3D group, with preselection of the TARP system using a 3D‐printed 1:1 scale model, while only imaging data was used for the non‐3D group. Complications, clinical outcomes (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] and visual analogue score [VAS]), and image measurements (atlas–dens interval [ADI], cervicomedullary angle [CMA], and clivus‐canal angle [CCA]) were noted preoperatively and at the last follow up.

Results

A total of 23 patients with a follow‐up time of 16.26 ± 4.27 months were included in the present study. The surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, and fluoroscopy times in the 3D group were found to be shorter than those in non‐3D group, with statistical significance. The surgery duration was 3.29 ± 0.45 h in the 3D group and 4.68 ± 0.90 h in the non‐3D group, and the estimated intraoperative blood loss was 131.67 ± 43.03 mL in the 3D group and 185.45 ± 42.28 mL in the non‐3D group. No patients received blood transfusions. The intraoperative fluoroscopy times were 5.67 ± 0.89 in the 3D group and 7.91 ± 1.45 in the non‐3D group. Preoperatively and at last follow up, JOA and VAS scores and ADI, CCA, and CMA were improved significantly within the two groups. However, no statistical difference was observed between the two groups. However, surgical site infection occurred in 1 patient in the 3D group, who underwent an emergency revision operation of the removal of TARP device and posterior occipitocervical fixation; the patient recovered 2 weeks after the surgery. In 2 patients in the traditional group, a mistake occurred in the placement of screws, with no neurological symptoms related to the misplacement.

Conclusion

Preoperative surgical simulation using a 3D‐printed real‐size model is an intuitive and effective aid for TARP surgery for treating IAAD. The 3D‐printed biomodel precisely replicated patient‐specific anatomy for use in complicated craniovertebral junction surgery. The information was more useful than that available with 3D reconstructed images.

Surgical treatment of a complex craniocervical malformation combined with posterior cranial fossa teratoma: a case report and literature review

Background

Basilar invagination (BI) with atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) is not uncommon in patients with scoliosis, Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS), and other bone deformities. Cases with combinations of the abovementioned dislocations and deformities with posterior cranial fossa teratoma are rare in the clinic and difficult to handle.

Case presentation

This case presents a 34-year-old woman diagnosed with atlantoaxial dislocation and posterior cranial fossa mass. After two surgeries, the posterior cranial teratoma was completely removed with satisfactory atlantoaxial reduction. The postoperative 1-year follow-up examination showed that the bone graft fusion was successful, without remaining significant dysfunction.

Conclusions

The surgical risk of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation combined with posterior cranial fossa tumor is huge. Thus, it needs to be fully preoperatively evaluated and managed carefully in accordance with sound surgical principles.

Surgical treatment for basilar invagination with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate fixation vs occipitocervical fixation

BACKGROUND

Transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) fixation or occipitocervical fixation (OF) is an effective treatment for basilar invagination (BI) with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD). But, all current clinical studies involved a single surgical procedure. The clinical effects of TARP and OF operation for BI with IAAD have yet to be compared. We therefore present this report to compare the treatment of TARP and OF procedure for BI with IAAD.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with BI with IAAD who underwent TARP or OF operation from June 2011 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Among these, 35 patients underwent TARP operation (TARP group), and 21 patients underwent OF operation (OF group). We compared the difference of clinical, radiological, and surgical outcomes between the TARP and OF groups postoperatively.

RESULTS

Compared with OF group, the operative time and blood loss in TARP group were lower. There was no statistical difference in the atlantodental interval (ADI), clivus canal angle (CCA), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), distance between the top of the odontoid process and the Chamberlain line (CL) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the TARP and OF groups preoperatively, but the improvements of these parameters in the TARP group were superior to those in the OF group postoperatively. The fusion rates were higher in the TARP group than those in the OF group at the early stage postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

TARP and OF operations are effective surgical treatment for BI with IAAD, but the performance of reduction and decompression and earlier bone fusion rates of TARP procedure are superior to those of OF.

Transoral intraarticular cage distraction and C-JAWS fixation for revision of basilar invagination with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation

Background

The revision surgery of basilar invagination (BI) with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) after a previous occipitocervical fusion (OCF) is challenging. Transoral revision surgery has more advantages than a combined anterior and posterior approach in addressing this pathology. The C-JAWS is a cervical compressive staple that has been used in the lower cervical spine with many advantages. Up to now, there is no report on the application of C-JAWS in the atlantoaxial joint. We therefore present this report to investigate the clinical outcomes of transoral intraarticular cage distraction and C-JAWS fixation for revision of BI with IAAD.

Methods

From June 2011 to June 2015, 9 patients with BI and IAAD were revised by this technique after previous posterior OCF in our department. Plain cervical radiographs, computed tomographic scans and magnetic resonance imaging were obtained pre- and postoperatively to assess the degree of atlantoaxial dislocation and compression of the cervical cord. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was used to evaluate the neurological function.

Results

The revision surgeries were successfully performed in all patients. The average follow-up duration was 18.9 ± 7.3 months (range 9–30 months). The postoperative atlas-dens interval (ADI), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), distance between the top of the odontoid process and the Chamberlain line (CL) and JOA score were significantly improved in all patients (P < 0.05). Bony fusion was achieved after 3–9 months in all cases. No patients developed recurrent atlantoaxial instability.

Conclusions

Transoral revision surgery by intraarticular cage distraction and C-JAWS fixation could provide a satisfactory outcome for BI with IAAD after a previous unsuccessful posterior operation.

Management of pediatric patients with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: transoral anterior release, reduction, and fixation

OBJECTIVE

Although transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP) surgery has been confirmed to be safe and effective for adults who have irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) with or without basilar invagination or upper cervical revision surgery, it is rarely used to treat these disorders in children. The authors of this study aimed to report on the use of the anterior technique in treating pediatric IAAD.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, the authors identified 8 consecutive patients with IAAD who had undergone surgical reduction at a single institution in the period between January 2011 and June 2104. The patients consisted of 5 males and 3 females. Three had os odontoideum, 2 had basilar invagination, and the other 3 experienced atlantoaxial rotatory fixed dislocation (AARFD). They were all treated using transoral anterior release, reduction, and fusion with the TARP. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans and MR images were obtained. American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale grades were determined.

RESULTS

All symptoms were relieved in all 8 patients but to varying degrees. Intraoperative loose reduction and fixation of C1-2 were achieved in one stage. The 4 patients with preoperative neurological deficits were significantly improved after surgery, and their latest follow-ups indicated that their ASIA Impairment Scale grades had improved to E. Postoperative pneumonia occurred in 1 patient but was under complete control after anti-infective therapy and fiber optic-guided sputum suction.

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage transoral anterior release, reduction, and fixation is an effective, reliable, and safe means of treating pediatric IAAD. The midterm clinical results are satisfactory, with the technique eliminating the need for interval traction and/or second-stage posterior instrumentation and fusion.

Anterior Retropharyngeal Cage Distraction and Fixation for Basilar Invagination: "The Wedge Technique"

OBJECTIVE

Surgery is indicated for basilar invagination (BI) in symptomatic patients. In many patients, symptoms and signs occur due to an upward-migrated and malaligned odontoid with fixed or mobile atlantoaxial instability. Posterior distraction and fixation of the atlantoaxial joints has evolved to become the standard of care, but has some inherent morbidity. In this study, we propose that the unilateral anterior submandibular retropharyngeal approach with customized wedge-shaped titanium cages inserted into both atlantoaxial joints and anterior atlantoaxial fixation with a plate screw construct is a safer and easier option in many cases of BI.

METHODS

From February 2014 to February 2019, 52 patients (age range, 15-78 years; 40 males and 12 females) with symptomatic BI with atlantoaxial dislocation and minimal sagittal facetal inclination and only mild Chiari malformation without syringomyelia were offered anterior submandibular retropharyngeal atlantoaxial distraction and fixation surgery.

RESULTS

Neurological improvement occurred in 80% of patients, while the neurological status of 20% remained unchanged. No patients worsened, and no major complications or mortality was observed.

CONCLUSION

In properly selected cases of symptomatic BI, anterior wedge cage distraction with anterior atlantoaxial fixation is a safe and simple option.

Japanese patient with Cole-carpenter syndrome with compound heterozygous variants of SEC24D

Cole-Carpenter syndrome is a rare skeletal dysplasia associated with low-bone mass or an osteogenesis imperfecta (OI)-like syndrome. Only 3 and 6 variants in SEC24D have been reported in patients with Cole-Carpenter syndrome type 2 and autosomal recessive OI, respectively. We describe a 15-year-old Japanese boy with short stature of the short-trunk type and craniofacial abnormalities including ocular proptosis, marked frontal bossing, midface hypoplasia, and micrognathia. These features were consistent with a diagnosis of Cole-Carpenter syndrome. He had low-bone mineral density and basilar impression. Whole exome sequencing analysis identified biallelic variants in SEC24D (p.Arg484* and p.Arg313His) in the patient. We will report a patient with compound heterozygous variants of SEC24D causing Cole-Carpenter syndrome type 2.

Delayed neurological deterioration following atlantoaxial facet joint distraction and fixation in a patient with Chiari malformation type I

Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) is typically treated with foramen magnum decompression. However, a recent study proposed a new technique for patients with CM-I, wherein only short atlantoaxial joint fusion and distraction is applied. Posterior fusion with or without atlantoaxial distraction is a potential option for patients with CM-I associated with basilar invagination or complex anomalous bony craniovertebral junction pathology, since this procedure allows clinicians to avoid using the technically demanding transoral approach in which some or all of the odontoid tip is invisible. Distraction of the atlantoaxial joint reduces ventral cervicomedullary compression, leading to neurological improvement. Here, the authors report the case of a 50-year-old woman with CM-I plus basilar invagination whose condition immediately improved but then gradually deteriorated following atlantoaxial joint distraction and fusion. Therefore, the authors performed endonasal/transoral odontoidectomy, which resulted in prolonged neurological recovery. Short atlantoaxial fusion with distraction is a smart and ideal surgical planning concept that can result in significant neurological improvement. However, this case suggests that anterior odontoidectomy is still an essential element of the intervention strategy for patients with CM-I with complex craniovertebral junction pathology.

Anterior endoscopically assisted bone grafting for iatrogenic distraction of odontoid fracture after percutaneous anterior screw fixation: A case report

RATIONALE

The complication of iatrogenic distraction of odontoid fracture after anterior screw fixation has not been reported in the literature. We treated the patient with endoscopically assisted bone grafting with good results. The new technique was not reported in the management of odontoid fracture or nonunion before.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 22-year-old man presented with neck pain after a motorcycle crash. The cervical spine radiograph and computed tomographic scan demonstrated the base of dens displaced 2 mm anteriorly.

DIAGNOSES

Radiographic images showed a type II odontoid fracture.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was treated by percutaneous anterior screw fixation. The postoperative radiograph and CT demonstrated an iatrogenic distraction of the odontoid with a gap of 6 mm.The follow-up radiograph did not show any sign of bone union 1 month and a half later. A revision surgery was given by anterior endoscopically assisted bone grafting. The patient was encouraged to sit out of bed immediately after the surgery with the protection of a soft cervical collar for 3 months.

OUTCOMES

No complications such as neural structures or vascular injuries were found. Bone union was achieved at the 1-year follow-up CT scans. Physical examination showed a full range of motion in the neck.

LESSONS

We reported a case of iatrogenic odontoid distraction that was managed by anterior endoscopically assisted bone grafting. It is a technically feasible and minimally invasive procedure.