Rerupture of a Blister Aneurysm After Treatment With a Single Flow-Diverting Stent

Flow diverting stent monotherapy as the best choice in the treatment of intracranial blood blister-like aneurysms: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of flow-diverting stent (FDS) monotherapy in the treatment of intracranial blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) through a detailed systematic review.

METHODS

This review adheres to the PRISMA guidelines, focusing on studies utilizing FDS monotherapy for BBAs, spanning from July 2010 to November 2023. A systematic search across databases including Embase, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted. Studies in English that solely used FDS for BBA treatment and assessed perioperative complications were included. Data from 23 studies encompassing 181 cases were systematically analyzed for patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment specifics, and outcomes.

RESULTS

The collected data indicates a dominant occurrence of BBAs in the internal carotid artery (86.9%), with a mean patient age of 50.27 years and a higher prevalence in females (73.43%). Treatment timing varied, with 45.9% treated within the first three days, 35.7% were treated between 4 and 14 days, and 18.4% of patients were treated after 14 days. The study found a complete occlusion rate of 88.1% in follow-up imaging and a favorable clinical outcome in 82.2% of cases. Periprocedural complications were reported in 19.2% of patients, with a related mortality rate of 3.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic review demonstrates that FDS monotherapy is highly effective and safe in the treatment of intracranial BBAs. It offers a high rate of complete aneurysm occlusion, favorable clinical outcomes, and low complication rates. These results highlight FDS monotherapy as a prominent treatment method, ensuring robust aneurysmal protection while maintaining the patency of the parent artery.

Periprocedural management of ruptured blister aneurysms treated with pipeline flow diversion

Background

Blister aneurysms are high-risk intracranial vascular lesions. Definitive treatment of these lesions has been challenging. Severe disability or mortality rates are as high as 55% when these lesions are treated with open surgery. Recent data show that flow diversion is a safe and effective alternative treatment for blister aneurysms. Rerupture of the functionally unsecured lesion remains a concern as flow diversion does not immediately exclude the aneurysm from the circulation.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of any patients with ruptured blister aneurysms treated with a pipeline embolization device between 2010 and 2020 at the University of Colorado.

Results

In this paper, we present the results of the intensive care management of ruptured intracranial blister aneurysms after flow-diverting stent placement.

Conclusion

Despite the need for dual antiplatelet therapy and the delayed occlusion of blister aneurysms treated with flow diversion, we did not find an increase in periprocedural complications.

Treatment with a flow diverter-assisted coil embolization for ruptured blood blister-like aneurysms of the internal carotid artery: a technical note and analysis of single-center experience with pooled data

Treatment of blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) with flow diverters (FDs) has become widespread in recent years. However, ruptured blood blister-like aneurysm (BBA) of ICA treatment with flow diverter-assisted coil embolization (FDAC) remains controversial. Moreover, limited direct comparative studies have been conducted between the two treatment modalities, FDs and FDAC, for BBAs. The purpose of this study was to document our experience and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of FDAC. We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological information from ten patients who experienced ruptured BBAs of the supraclinoid ICA at our center from January 2021 to February 2023. The technical details of FDAC for ruptured BBAs were described, and the technical steps were named "pipeline embolization device (PED)-Individualized shaping(microcatheter)-Semi deploying-Rivet(coils)-Massage(microwire)" as the PEISSERM technique. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), whereas radiological results were determined through angiography. A pooled analysis was implemented, incorporating data from literature sources that reported perioperative and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of ruptured BBAs treated with FD and FDAC strategies, along with our data. Data in our analysis pool were categorized into FD and FDAC strategy groups to explore the preferred treatment modalities for BBAs. The PEISSERM technique was utilized to treat ten patients, seven males, and three females, with an average age of 41.7 years. A single PED was deployed in conjunction with coils in all ten patients. All PEDs were documented to have good wall apposition. The immediate postoperative angiograms demonstrated Raymond grade I in ten aneurysms. Angiographic follow-up of nine patients at 4-25 months showed total occlusion of the aneurysms. At the most recent follow-up, the mRS scores of nine patients hinted at a good prognosis. Pooled analysis of 233 ICA-BBA cases of FD revealed a technical success rate of 91% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88 to 0.95], a rate of complete occlusion of 79% (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.84), a recurrence rate of 2% (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.04), a rebleed rate of 2% (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.04), and the perioperative stroke rate was 8% (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.11). The perioperative mortality was 4% (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.07). The long-term good clinical outcome rate was 85% (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90). The mortality rate was 6% (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.09). Results from the subgroup analysis illustrated that the FDAC strategy for BBAs had a significantly higher immediate postoperative complete occlusion rate (P < 0.001), total occlusion rate (P = 0.016), and a good outcome rate (P = 0.041) compared with the FD strategy. The FDAC strategy can yield a higher rate of good outcomes than the FD strategy. The PEISSERM technique employed by the FDAC is a reliable and effective treatment approach as it can minimize the hemodynamic burden of BBA's fragile dome, thereby achieving an excellent occlusion rate. The PEISSERM technique in the FDAC strategy contributes to understanding the BBA's treatment and offers a potentially optimal treatment for BBA.

Technical Nuances and Outcomes of Telescoping Pipeline Flow Diverters: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

"Telescoping" multiple overlapping Pipeline Embolization Devices (PEDs; Medtronic) has increased their utility by allowing for more impermeable coverage and providing the ability to off-set landing zone sites and extend treatment constructs.

OBJECTIVE

To consider the technical nuances and challenges of telescoping PEDs for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

Databases from 3 U.S. academic neurovascular centers were retrospectively queried to identify patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with multiple PED constructs. Data on patient and aneurysm characteristics, as well as outcomes including Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, modified Rankin Scale score, and complications, were gathered.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients had 48 intracranial aneurysms treated, including 16 (33%) in whom placement of telescoping PEDs was planned. Fourteen (30%) patients presented with a ruptured aneurysm. Twenty-one aneurysms (44%) were treated with proximal extension, 13 (27%) with distal extension, and 14 (29%) with PED placement inside one another. Thirty (70%) patients had complete aneurysm occlusion at follow-up. Two (4%) patients had to be retreated. Three patients with unruptured and 1 with ruptured aneurysm had a permanent intraprocedural complication. We present descriptive cases illustrating PEDs that were placed inside one another, proximally, distally, and to improve wall apposition because of vessel tortuosity.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate a higher than expected complication rate that is likely because of the technical complexity of these cases. The case illustrations presented demonstrate the indications and challenging aspects of telescoping PEDs.

Flow Diverter Device-Assisted Coiling Treatment for Cerebral Blister Aneurysm: A Single-Center Study

Although endovascular treatment is a promising approach, blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) still present treatment challenges. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of flow diverter device-assisted coiling (FDDAC) for the treatment of BBAs, which are broad based and friable with a high rebleeding risk. Eight patients (five females and three males) who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAH) due to BBA ruptures between May 2020 and May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were treated by flow diverter device (Tubridge) adjunctive coil embolization using a semi-deploying technique. The demographic information, angiographic data, interval between admission and treatment, materials, therapy, clinical outcomes (including periprocedural and intraprocedural mortality and morbidity), and follow-up results of all patients were reviewed. The mean age of the patients with BBAs was 48.5 years (range 31–62 years); aneurysm sizes ranged from 2.2 × 1.7 mm to 4.6 × 3.2 mm, and the median Hunt–Hess score was 3. All aneurysms were completely closed at follow-up, and all 8 patients had excellent clinical outcomes (modified Rankin scores = 0–2) at discharge. Angiograms showed complete aneurysm occlusion after 6 months to 1 year. In addition, there were no cases of re-rupture, re-treatment, or recurrence of the aneurysms. FDDAC is safe to use in patients with BBAs and provides an alternative treatment option for this disease.

Case report: Covered stent placement to treat delayed aneurysmal rupture after flow diverter-assisted coil embolization

INTRODUCTION

Flow diverter (FD) placement is widely accepted as a treatment for large saccular intracranial aneurysms. Delayed aneurysmal rupture (DAR) after FD placement is potentially catastrophic and difficult to treat. To our knowledge, using a Willis covered stent (WCS) to treat DAR after placement of a Pipeline Flex embolization device (PFED) combined with coiling has not been previously reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 49-year-old woman with an incidental asymptomatic large right supraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm was treated with PFED placement and adjunctive coiling. DAR causing subarachnoid hemorrhage occurred 11 hours after the procedure. Treatment using a WCS was successful and resulted in a favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale score 2).

CONCLUSION

DAR after FD implantation requires isolation of the aneurysm from the cerebral circulation as soon as possible. WCS placement can achieve this immediately and occlude the aneurysm. We hope our case could provide new idea for similar cases in the future.

Treatment of Blood Blister Aneurysms of the Internal Carotid Artery With Pipeline-Assisted Coil Embolization: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Blood blister aneurysm (BBA) is a complex and rare aneurysm that presents significant treatment challenges. The application of pipeline embolization device (PED)-assisted coiling in the treatment of ruptured BBA remains controversial. This study aimed to report on our experience and assess the safety and efficacy of this strategy.

Methods

Between February 2019 and February 2021, 12 patients with ruptured BBAs underwent PED-assisted coil embolization. We collected detailed data about each patient, including demographic information, aneurysmal data, technical details, antiplatelet strategy, operation-related complications, and follow-up outcomes.

Results

A total of 12 BBA patients were treated with single PED-assisted coil embolization. One patient experienced intraoperative rupture that was controlled by rapid coiling without clinical consequences. All the patients demonstrated complete occlusion on postoperative angiography. A total of three patients had postoperative complications: left hemiparesis, Broca's aphasia, and right hemiplegia due to vasospasm, and transient hemiparesis. Follow-up angiography revealed that all BBAs were completely occluded, except one with neck residue. All patients had favorable outcomes at discharge and the most recent clinical follow-up (mRS score ≤ 2).

Conclusion

Endovascular treatment of BBAs of the internal carotid artery using PED-assisted coil embolization is a safe and effective strategy. This has contributed to the understanding of BBA therapy and provides a potentially optimal treatment option for this intractable lesion.

Cerebrovascular bypass for ruptured aneurysms: A case series

In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) unfavorable for endovascular or traditional open surgical techniques, surgical revascularization strategies comprise one of remaining limited options. There is nonetheless a paucity of data on the safety and efficacy of bypass in aSAH. In this study, we aimed to investigate complications and outcomes in a cohort of patients with aSAH treated with bypass. A prospective single-surgeon database of consecutive patients treated for aSAH between 2013 and 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Complications and functional status at discharge were recorded and analyzed for the patients that underwent bypass surgery. Forty patients with aSAH were treated with bypass surgery (23 extracranial-intracranial; 17 intracranial-intracranial). All-cause perioperative mortality was 13% (6 patients). At discharge and at mean 14-month follow up, respectively, 16/40 (40%) and 16/25 (64%) of patients achieved a Glasgow Outcome Score of 4-5. All-cause, in-hospital complications occurred in 28 patients (70%), of which any ischemic complication occurred in 20 patients (50%), 7 (18%) being open surgical complications. This work represents the largest modern series of bypass for aSAH to date. In cases of aSAH unfavorable for endovascular intervention or traditional open surgical techniques, bypass remains a viable option in this complex group of patients.

Flow Diverter-Assisted Coil Embolization of Blood Blister-Like Aneurysm Using Semi-deploying Technique

Despite many therapeutic methods were utilized to treat blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs), the optimal treatment approach has not yet been defined. This study presents the single center experience with BBAs treated with flow diverter-assisted coiling using semi-deploying technique, and discusses the efficacy and safety of the method. The patients with subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAH) due to BBAs and treated with Pipeline Flex Embolization Device (PED) between November 2015 and February 2019 in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographic data, timing of treatment, angiographic details, treatment techniques, clinical outcomes and follow-up results were recorded. Ten cases (6 women and 4 men) were enrolled. The mean age of patients was 50.7 years (range 40–61 years). The aneurysm size ranged from 2 × 1.7 mm to 4.5 × 3.8 mm. Seven patients were treated with PED assisted coil embolization using semi-deploying technique, and all of the aneurysms were totally obliterated at the follow up. One patient treated with PED assisted coil embolization suffered from parenchymal hemorrhage 3 days after the treatment, and another one patient also treated with PED and coil died of severe vasospasm 10 days after the treatment. There was no reruptured cases during the follow-up. Here we showed that PED assisted coil embolization using semi-deploying technique could be a technically safe and effective treatment for BBAs.

Delayed rupture of intracranial aneurysms after placement of intra-luminal flow diverter

BACKGROUND

Though flow diverter is a safe and efficient modality, some patients can experience delayed aneurysmal rupture. The mechanism of delayed rupture is still obscure to us.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search in the PubMed database for patients with delayed rupture of intracranial aneurysms after flow diverter placement.

RESULTS

A total of 36 articles reporting on 60 patients were included in the final analysis. Of the 49 patients with description of presenting symptoms, six (12.2%) patients were incidentally diagnosed, 39 (87.8%) patients were admitted for aneurysmal rupture or mass effect. Multiple flow diverters were used in 38.3% (18/47) of the patients. Coil assistance was applied in 13.0% (7/54) of the patients. Delayed aneurysmal rupture led to intracranial hemorrhage or carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (CCF) in 76.8% (43/56) and 23.2% (13/56) of the patients, respectively. Of the 55 patients with description of outcome, 14 (25.5%) patients achieved good recovery, one (1.8%) patient was severely disabled, 40 (72.7%) patients died. All of the patients in the CCF group survived and experienced good recovery.

CONCLUSION

Increased intra-aneurysmal pressure, destabilization of the aneurysm wall by intra-aneurysmal thrombus, persistent residual intra-aneurysmal flow, characteristics of the specific aneurysm, and mechanical injury by the flow diverter might conjointly contribute to the final delayed rupture. There has been no established preventive measure to decrease the incidence of delayed rupture yet. The treatment and outcome depend on the presentation of delayed rupture. Patients presenting with aneurysm-related intracranial hemorrhage have a dismal outcome. Those presenting with CCFs usually have a satisfactory recovery.

Treatment of Ruptured Blister-Like Aneurysms with the FRED Flow Diverter: A Multicenter Experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms is technically challenging. This study aimed at analyzing the safety and efficacy of the Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) in the treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective multicenter study, all patients treated with the FRED due to a ruptured intracranial blister-like aneurysm between January 2013 and May 2019 were analyzed. The primary end points for clinical safety were mRS 0-2 at 6 months after treatment and the absence of major ipsilateral stroke or death. The primary end points for efficacy were the absence of rebleeding after treatment and complete angiographic occlusion according to the O'Kelly-Marotta classification at 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 30 patients with 30 ruptured blister-like aneurysms were treated. Immediate complete aneurysm obliteration (O'Kelly-Marotta classification D) with the FRED was achieved in 10 patients (33%). Of the 26 patients with follow-up, complete obliteration was achieved in 21 patients (80%) after 6 months and in 24 patients (92%) in the final follow-up (median, 22 months). Twenty-three patients (77%) achieved mRS 0-2 at 6 months. Major stroke or death occurred in 17%. Two patients died due to pneumonia, and 2 patients died due to infarction following cerebral vasospasm. There was no case of rebleeding after FRED implantation. There was 1 case of delayed asymptomatic stent occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms with the FRED is safe and effective.

Rerupture Following Flow Diversion of a Dissecting Aneurysm of the Vertebral Artery: Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Dissecting aneurysms of the posterior cerebral circulation can wield significant treatment challenges with devastating clinical outcomes. Despite an expanded therapeutic armamentarium, these vascular lesions remain relatively difficult to diagnose and portend high associated morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A ruptured, fusiform, dissecting aneurysm of the mid V4 segment of the right vertebral artery (VA) distal to the posterior inferior cerebellar artery origin resulted in a Hunt and Hess grade 5, Fisher scale score 4 subarachnoid hemorrhage. The lesion incorporated 360 degrees of the vessel wall and extended across an area measuring 11 mm in length and 6.8 mm in width at maximum dimension. The vascular lesion was treated with 2 overlapping Pipeline Embolization Devices.

RESULTS

Digital subtraction angiography demonstrated an origin of the right posterior inferior cerebellar artery mildly stenosed by the dissecting aneurysm. The left VA was markedly hypoplastic. After deployment of 2 overlapping Pipeline Embolization Devices, the aneurysm neck was well covered with appropriate positioning of the stent construct with good apposition to the vessel wall. There was contrast stasis within the aneurysm. The patient was managed with dual antiplatelet therapy. He demonstrated initial clinical and radiographic improvement. However, on the night of the second postprocedure day, the patient succumbed to rerupture of the aneurysm.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature posits that nonsaccular, fusiform, and dissecting aneurysms of the vertebrobasilar circulation can be occluded with consistency and success using flow diversion techniques. Endovascular treatment of a ruptured dissecting aneurysm of the VA is technically feasible and can be performed with or without parent artery occlusion. Outcomes following flow diversion of the posterior circulation may depend on the location of the dissection and viability of collateral circulation. In the present case, adequate coverage of the aneurysm did not portend a positive outcome.

Ruptured Fisher grade 3 blister aneurysms have a higher incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia than ruptured Fisher grade 3 saccular aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Blister aneurysms are a rare subclass of aneurysms, which remain challenging to treat both with open cerebrovascular and endovascular techniques, and clinicians continue to see poor outcomes in some cases despite improvements in technology. Based on our clinical observations, we hypothesized that patients with a Fisher grade 3 subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from a ruptured anterior circulation blister aneurysm are significantly more likely to develop poor outcome due to delayed cerebral ischemia than patients with a Fisher grade 3 SAH from a ruptured anterior circulation saccular aneurysm.

METHODS

In this consecutive case series, we reviewed management, outcomes, and rates of delayed cerebral ischemia for all ruptured anterior circulation blister aneurysms from 2012 to 2018 at our institution and compared them to a concurrent cohort of ruptured saccular anterior circulation aneurysms. A blister aneurysm was defined as an aneurysm that arises from a nonbranching point and demonstrates hemispherical anatomy on diagnostic angiography.

RESULTS

We identified 14 consecutive ruptured anterior circulation blister aneurysms. Thirteen aneurysms were treated operatively- 5 with clip remodeling and 8 with flow diversion embolization. While clip remodeling had a high intraoperative rupture rate (80%), there was only one (12.5%) intraoperative rupture with flow diversion embolization. Outcomes were worsened by delayed cerebral ischemia from vasospasm in patients with Fisher 3 hemorrhages from blister aneurysms (86%). The rate of delayed cerebral ischemia from vasospasm was significantly higher for ruptured blister aneurysms than for a concurrent cohort of ruptured saccular aneurysms (8.6%, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Ruptured Fisher grade 3 anterior circulation blister aneurysms have a significantly higher incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia from vasospasm compared to saccular aneurysms, regardless of the treatment modality.

Poor Results of Flow Diversion as Salvage Treatment for Intracranial Aneurysm Rerupture After Surgical Clip Reconstruction

Rebleeding episodes after a ruptured intracranial aneurysm has been secured are considered a significant source of patient morbidity and mortality. Theoretically, acute treatment with a flow-diversion device may offer a reasonable treatment option to prevent future bleeding and to remodel the diseased vessel segment. The authors identified two patients who underwent emergent treatment with the placement of a Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) in the setting of an acute rebleeding of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm previously treated with clip reconstruction. The first patient was a 50-year-old woman who underwent clip reconstruction for a broad-based right anterior choroidal artery aneurysm measuring approximately 2×8 mm. Clip reconstruction was achieved with a single fenestrated clip. On day 14, the patient experienced a rebleeding episode. She underwent emergent treatment with a single PED but experienced another rebleeding and died. The second patient was a 53-year-old woman who presented with a ruptured dorsal variant blister aneurysm, which was treated with clip reconstruction. On day 22, she experienced a rebleeding episode and underwent emergent treatment using two PEDs in a duplicative fashion. After the procedure, she experienced another acute rebleeding episode and died. The treatment of reruptured intracranial aneurysms in a salvage fashion with emergent placement of PEDs in two patients resulted in good technical placement of the device covering the neck of the aneurysm, yet both patients experienced additional rebleeding and did not survive. Future generations of flow diverters may have more appropriate properties that would allow their use as salvage treatment in the setting of acutely ruptured aneurysms.

Flow diverter embolization device for endovascular treatment of ruptured blister and wide necked very small aneurysms

Purpose

Ruptured blood blisters (BBA) and very small, wide necked aneurysms (VSA) remain challenging lesions to treat due to their small size, wide necks, and thin, fragile walls. In the present study, we reviewed our experience with these aneurysms treated by flow diversion.

Methods

A total of 18 patients with hemorrhage due to a ruptured BBAs and VSAs, treated with flow diversion between July 2014 and March 2016 were included in this study. We analyzed clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Results

A total of 12 (66.7%) VSAs and 6 (33.3%) BBAs were treated with flow diversion. Fifteen (83.3%) and three (16.7%) aneurysms were located on the internal carotid artery and the basilar artery, respectively. On admission, a GCS score of 15 and WFNS grade 1 were found in 14 (77.7%) patients, 3 patients had an admission GCS of 13 and WFNS grade 2, one had an admission GCS of 8 and WFNS of 4. Fisher CT grades 2, 3, and 4 were observed in 11 (61.1%), 1 (5.6%), and 6 (33.3%) patients, respectively. Flow diversion was performed on average 5.6 days after onset of hemorrhage. 6 months post-intervention angiography showed complete obliteration of the aneurysms in all patients.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that flow diversion in the acute and subacute phase of hemorrhage is a reliable treatment for reducing complications in patients with BBAs and VSAs. In patients with poor clinical presentation it might be reasonable to delay treatment until the first signs of recovery become apparent.

Clipping on Crossed Wrapping Method for Ruptured Blood Blister-Like Aneurysm of the Internal Carotid Artery: Technical Note and Long-Term Results

Background

We have been performing the clipping on crossed wrapping (COCW) method using 2 strips of cotton on patients with an internal carotid artery blood blister-like aneurysm (IC-BLA). This method is reliable in preventing the clips from slipping off and the aneurysm walls from being damaged during clipping, and it enables more appropriate and safer clipping. Here we report the technical details of this method and the long-term outcomes of patients receiving this procedure.

Methods

Fifteen of 1275 (1.5%) patients with a ruptured cerebral aneurysm who received treatment at the Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital during the period from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2016, had an IC-BLA. All 15 patients were treated with COCW, except for the first patient, who was treated using a single strip of cotton. The long-term outcome of the treatment was analyzed.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 74 months. The first patient experienced rerupture of an aneurysm 10 days after the operation. No complications or regrowth of an aneurysm were observed in the remaining 14 patients during the follow-up period, except for 1 patient who received a reoperation for the regrowth of an aneurysm. As the final outcome, the numbers of patients with a Modified Rankin Score of 0, 3, and 6 were 13, 1, and 1, respectively.

Conclusions

It is suggested that COCW is a treatment that enables safe and long-term management of lesions in IC-BLAs.

Microsurgical clipping and endovascular flow diversion of ruptured anterior circulation blood blister-like aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Detection and treatment of blister-like intracranial aneurysms as a source of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) can be challenging. In the past the results of both microsurgical and endovascular treatment were difficult. We present our experience with the treatment of blister-like aneurysms in the acute phase of SAH using microsurgical clipping, endovascular parent vessel occlusion or flow diversion.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the cases of eight consecutive patients presenting in the acute phase after SAH from an intracranial blister aneurysm was performed. The demographic data of the patients, aneurysm characteristics, the clinical results of the treatment and the follow-up examinations were recorded. Procedural safety margins and aneurysm occlusion on follow-up digital subtraction angiography were the main interest of this evaluation.

RESULTS

Between January 2012 and November 2017 a total of eight ruptured blister aneurysms were treated in our center, six patients endovascularly. Five patients were treated in the acute phase of SAH, four by flow diversion. All endovascular procedures were feasible and no procedure-related complications were observed, especially no recurrent hemorrhage. In the first angiographic follow-up all blood blister-like aneurysms were completely occluded; two of the six patients treated by flow diverter implantation showed mild, transient intimal hyperplasia without clinical symptoms or the need for treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular flow diversion is a viable option in the acute phase after SAH due to the rupture of a blister aneurysm. Implants with reduced thrombogenicity, obviating dual-platelet function inhibition, and flow diverters for vessel bifurcations would extend the indications for this treatment modality.

Acute rerupture after coil embolization of ruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms: A literature review

Acute rerupture after coil embolization is defined as rerupture within three days after treatment; its prognosis is worse than that of rebleeding at other time periods. However, to date, little is known about complications during the acute phase. Therefore, we used the PubMed database to perform a review of acute rerupture after coil embolization of ruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms and increase our understanding. After reviewing the complications, we found that the cause of acute rerupture is unclear, but the following risk factors are involved: incomplete occlusion of the initial aneurysm, the presence of a hematoma adjacent to a ruptured aneurysm, an aneurysmal outpouching, poor Hunt-Hess grade at the time of treatment, and the location of the aneurysm in an anterior communicating artery. In addition, intraoperative rupture is a non-negligible cause. Acute rerupture after coil embolization mainly occurs within the first 24 hours after the procedure. Brain computed tomography is the gold standard for diagnosing acute rebleeding of a coiled aneurysm. For acute rerupture after coil embolization, prevention is critical, and complete occlusion of the aneurysm in the first session is the best protection against acute rebleeding. In addition, a restricted postembolization anticoagulation strategy is recommended for patients with high-risk aneurysms. For patients with an adjacent hematoma, surgical clipping is recommended. Most patients present no changes immediately after acute rebleeding because of their poor condition. However, surgical or endovascular treatments can be attempted if the patient is in an acceptable condition. Even so, the outcomes are typically unsatisfactory.

Contemporary endovascular and open aneurysm treatment in the era of flow diversion

Clinical outcomes have improved considerably over the last decade for patients with ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Modern endovascular techniques, such as flow diversion, are associated with high aneurysm occlusion rates and have become a popular treatment modality for many types of aneurysms. However, the safety and effectiveness of flow diversion has not yet been established in trials comparing it with traditional aneurysm treatments. Moreover, there are some types of aneurysms that may not be appropriate for endovascular coiling, such as wide-necked aneurysms located at branch points of major vessels, large saccular aneurysms with multiple efferent arteries, dolichoectatic aneurysms, large aneurysms with mass effect, when there are technical complications with endovascular treatment, when patients cannot tolerate or have contraindications to antiplatelet therapy or in the setting of a subarachnoid haemorrhage. For these cases, open cerebrovascular surgery remains important. This review provides a discussion on the current trends and evidence for both flow diversion and open cerebrovascular surgery for complex aneurysms that may not be suitable for coiling. We emphasise a continued important role for surgical treatment in certain situations.

Evaluation of Enterprise Stent-Assisted Coiling and Telescoping Stent Technique as Treatment of Supraclinoid Blister Aneurysms of the Internal Carotid Artery

BACKGROUND

Supraclinoid blister aneurysms (BAs) of the internal carotid artery are uncommon and deadly, and appropriate treatment is controversial. Endovascular reconstruction may allow treatment through aneurysm isolation. We report a single-institution experience in the use of Enterprise stent-assisted coiling (ESAC) for treating BAs to appraise the safety and efficacy of this technique.

METHODS

Patients treated with ESAC for a BA at our institution between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively included in this study. Patients' aneurysm characteristics, progression status, aneurysm occlusion on follow-up angiography, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score were recorded and analyzed. Occlusion rates and neurologic outcomes were compared between patients treated with a single stent and those treated with multiple telescoping stents.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were included (17 males; average age, 47.3 years), and ESAC was successfully performed in all patients. Immediate postprocedure angiography revealed complete occlusion in 23 patients (52.3%), residual neck in 15 (34.1%), and residual aneurysm in 6 (13.6%). Twenty patients (45.5%) suffered perioperative cerebral vasospasm, and 3 (6.8%) died of secondary ischemic stroke. The duration of follow-up ranged from 2.5 to 27 months (mean, 11.59 ± 5.76 months). One patient with recurrence was treated with additional coiling, and another patient was treated with a covered stent. The use of telescoping stents was associated with a better complete aneurysm occlusion rate compared with the use of single stents (84.4% [27 of 34] vs. 44.4% [4 of 9]; P = 0.04). Follow-up mRS score was ≤1 for 32 of 41 patients (78.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

ESAC to treat BAs is safe, effective, and provides good clinical outcomes. ESAC with telescoping stents has a higher follow-up complete occlusion rate compared with ESAC with single stents.

Treatment of ruptured blood blister aneurysms using primary flow-diverter stenting with considerations for adjunctive coiling: A single-centre experience and literature review

Objective The objective of this article is to conduct a single-centre evaluation and quick literature review of the effectiveness of primary flow-diverter (FD) treatment of ruptured blood blister aneurysms (BBAs), with additional relevance of adjunctive coiling. Methods Patients presenting with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) due to ruptured BBAs and subsequently treated with FDs were retrospectively selected from June 2010 to January 2017. Treatment techniques, angiographic data on occlusion rates and procedural success as well as clinical outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were collated. Cross-reference of results were made with available literature. Results Thirteen patients harbouring 14 BBAs were recruited. Of the 14 aneurysms, five (35.7%) showed immediate complete occlusion after the procedure (four of these five patients had adjunctive coiling). All of the aneurysms showed complete occlusion by the six- to nine-month control diagnostic angiogram. No rebleed or retreatment was experienced. Twelve of 13 (92%) patients had an mRS score of 0-1 at the last clinical follow-up. From the pooled data of the literature review, eventual aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 48/56 patients, with five patients requiring further endovascular treatment. In the clinical follow-up period, an mRS of 0-2 was recorded for 83.3% (45/54) of patients. Conclusion Endovascular reconstruction of BBAs using FD treatment is an effective method with good final clinical outcomes. Adjunctive use of coiling achieves higher incidence of immediate complete occlusion of BBAs.

Pipeline flow diversion of ruptured blister aneurysms of the supraclinoid carotid artery using a single-device strategy

OBJECTIVE

Ruptured blister aneurysms remain challenging lesions for treatment due to their broad, shallow anatomy and thin, fragile wall. Historical challenges with both open microsurgical approaches and intrasaccular endovascular approaches have led to increased use of flow diversion for management of these aneurysms. However, the optimum paradigm, including timing of treatment, use of dual antiplatelet therapy, and number of flow-diverter devices to use remains unknown. The authors describe their experience with ruptured blister aneurysms treated with flow diversion at their institution, and discuss rates of rebleeding and number of devices used.

METHODS

All patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage from a ruptured blister aneurysm and treated with Pipeline flow diversion were identified. Patient demographic data, clinical status and course, need for external ventricular drain (EVD), timing of treatment, and angiographic details and follow-up were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 13 patients identified (11 women and 2 men), and 4 had multiple aneurysms. Two aneurysms were treated on initial angiography, with average time to treatment of 3.1 days for the remainder, after discussion with the family and institution of dual antiplatelet therapy. Device placement was technically successful in all patients, with 2 patients receiving 2 devices and the remainder receiving 1 device. There was 1 intraoperative complication, of a wire perforation causing intracerebral hemorrhage requiring decompressive craniectomy. Three patients had required EVD placement for management of hydrocephalus. There was no rebleeding from the target lesion; however, one patient had worsening intraventricular hemorrhage and another had rupture of an unrecognized additional aneurysm, and both died. Of the other 11 patients, 10 made a good recovery, with 1 remaining in a vegetative state. Nine underwent follow-up angiography, with 5 achieving complete occlusion, 2 with reduced aneurysm size, and 2 requiring retreatment for aneurysm persistence or enlargement. There were no episodes of delayed rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

Pipeline flow diversion is a technically feasible and effective treatment for ruptured blister aneurysms, particularly in good-grade patients without hydrocephalus. Patients with a worse grade on presentation and requiring EVDs may have higher risk for bleeding complications and poor outcome. There was no rebleeding from the target lesion with use of a single device in this series.

Endovascular treatment of blister aneurysms

Blister aneurysms are rare cerebrovascular lesions for which the treatment methods are reviewed here, with a focus on endovascular options. The reported pathogenesis of blister aneurysms varies, and hemodynamic stress, arterial dissection, and arteriosclerotic ulceration have all been described. There is consensus on the excessive fragility of blister aneurysms and their parent vessels, which makes clipping technically difficult. Open surgical treatment is associated with high rates of complications, morbidity, and mortality; endovascular treatment is a promising alternative. Among endovascular treatment options, deconstructive treatment has been associated with higher morbidity compared with reconstructive methods such as direct embolization, stent- or balloon-assisted direct embolization, stent monotherapy, and flow diversion. Flow diversion has been associated with higher technical success rates and similar clinical outcomes compared with non–flow diverting treatment methods. However, delayed aneurysm occlusion and the need for antiplatelet therapy are potential drawbacks to flow diversion that must be considered when choosing among treatment methods for blister aneurysms.