Fractionated Proton Radiation Therapy and Hearing Preservation for Vestibular Schwannoma: Preliminary Analysis of a Prospective Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Controversies in neuro-oncology: Focal proton versus photon radiation therapy for adult brain tumors

Radiation therapy (RT) plays a fundamental role in the treatment of malignant and benign brain tumors. Current state-of-the-art photon- and proton-based RT combines more conformal dose distribution of target volumes and accurate dose delivery while limiting the adverse radiation effects. PubMed was systematically searched from from 2000 to October 2023 to identify studies reporting outcomes related to treatment of central nervous system (CNS)/skull base tumors with PT in adults. Several studies have demonstrated that proton therapy (PT) provides a reduced dose to healthy brain parenchyma compared with photon-based (xRT) radiation techniques. However, whether dosimetric advantages translate into superior clinical outcomes for different adult brain tumors remains an open question. This review aims at critically reviewing the recent studies on PT in adult patients with brain tumors, including glioma, meningiomas, and chordomas, to explore its potential benefits compared with xRT.

Evolving Role of Proton Radiation Therapy in Clinical Practice

With the expansion of proton radiation therapy centers across the United States and a gradually expanding body of academic evidence supporting its use, more patients are receiving-and asking about-proton therapy than ever before. Here, we outline, for nonradiation oncologists, the theoretical benefits of proton therapy, the clinical evidence to date, the controversies affecting utilization, and the numerous randomized trials currently in progress. We also discuss the challenges of researching and delivering proton therapy, including the cost of constructing and maintaining centers, barriers with insurance approval, clinical situations in which proton therapy may be approached with caution, and the issue of equitable access for all patients. The purpose of this review is to assist practicing oncologists in understanding the evolving role of proton therapy and to help nonradiation oncologists guide patients regarding this technology.

Hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this systematic review is to analyse the role of hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma. The complications and hearing outcomes of the single surgical techniques were investigated and compared with those of less invasive strategies, such as stereotactic radiotherapy and wait and scan policy. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. All included studies were published in English between 2000 and 2022. Literature data show that hearing preservation is achieved in less than 25% of patients after surgery and in approximately half of cases after stereotactic radiotherapy, even if data on long-term preservation are currently not available.

Cochlear-optimized treatment planning in photon and proton radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma patients

Objective

To investigate the potential to reduce the cochlear dose with robotic photon radiosurgery or intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for vestibular schwannomas.

Materials and Methods

Clinically delivered photon radiosurgery treatment plans were compared to five cochlear-optimized plans: one photon and four proton plans (total of 120). A 1x12 Gy dose was prescribed. Photon plans were generated with Precision (Cyberknife, Accuray) with no PTV margin for set-up errors. Proton plans were generated using an in-house automated multi-criterial planning system with three or nine-beam arrangements, and applying 0 or 3 mm robustness for set-up errors during plan optimization and evaluation (and 3 % range robustness). The sample size was calculated based on a reduction of cochlear Dmean > 1.5 Gy(RBE) from the clinical plans, and resulted in 24 patients.

Results

Compared to the clinical photon plans, a reduction of cochlear Dmean > 1.5 Gy(RBE) could be achieved in 11/24 cochlear-optimized photon plans, 4/24 and 6/24 cochlear-optimized proton plans without set-up robustness for three and nine-beam arrangement, respectively, and in 0/24 proton plans with set-up robustness. The cochlea could best be spared in cases with a distance between tumor and cochlea. Using nine proton beams resulted in a reduced dose to most organs at risk.

Conclusion

Cochlear dose reduction is possible in vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery while maintaining tumor coverage, especially when the tumor is not adjacent to the cochlea. With current set-up robustness, proton therapy is capable of providing lower dose to organs at risk located distant to the tumor, but not for organs adjacent to it. Consequently, photon plans provided better cochlear sparing than proton plans.

Proton beam radiation therapy for vestibular schwannomas-tumor control and hearing preservation rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Proton beam therapy is considered, by some authors, as having the advantage of delivering dose distributions more conformal to target compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of proton beam for VSs, evaluating tumor control and cranial nerve preservation rates, particularly with regard to facial and hearing preservation.

METHODS

We reviewed, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) articles published between 1968 and September 30, 2022. We retained 8 studies reporting 587 patients.

RESULTS

Overall rate of tumor control (both stability and decrease in volume) was 95.4% (range 93.5-97.2%, p heterogeneity= 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of tumor progression was 4.6% (range 2.8-6.5%, p heterogeneity < 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of trigeminal nerve preservation (absence of numbness) was 95.6% (range 93.5-97.7%, I2 = 11.44%, p heterogeneity= 0.34, p<0.001). Overall rate of facial nerve preservation was 93.7% (range 89.6-97.7%, I2 = 76.27%, p heterogeneity<0.001, p<0.001). Overall rate of hearing preservation was 40.6% (range 29.4-51.8%, I2 = 43.36%, p heterogeneity= 0.1, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Proton beam therapy for VSs achieves high tumor control rates, as high as 95.4%. Facial rate preservation overall rates are 93%, which is lower compared to the most SRS series. Compared with most currently reported SRS techniques, proton beam radiation therapy for VSs does not offer an advantage for facial and hearing preservation compared to most of the currently reported SRS series.

Intratumoral hemorrhage in vestibular schwannomas after stereotactic radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE

Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) are benign tumors of the cerebellopontine angle that are typically managed with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Intratumoral hemorrhage (ITH) of VSs is a rare occurrence that results in worsening vestibular and new cranial nerve deficits. Few reports have described the management and outcomes of this entity after SRS. To further delineate the incidence and impact of this event, the authors performed a retrospective review of their VS SRS patients at a single center.

METHODS

Between 1987 and 2022, 2058 patients with VSs underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. The authors performed a review of the prospectively maintained VS database at their center to identify patients with ITH. The presentation, management, and clinical and imaging outcomes of the patients are reported.

RESULTS

A total of 1902 VS patients had sufficient clinical and imaging follow-up data. Five Koos grade III (n = 1) and IV (n = 4) VS patients developed ITH after GKRS, resulting in a cumulative incidence rate of 0.26%. The age at presentation ranged from 62 to 79 years, and 3 patients were male. The time from VS diagnosis to GKRS ranged from 1 to 13 months, and the time from GKRS to ITH ranged from 2 to 130 months. Three patients had bleeding risk factors. One patient required urgent surgical intervention due to the ITH volume, while the other 4 patients were initially observed. Three patients remained stable and required no delayed intervention; 1 patient required delayed resection because of symptom progression and hemorrhagic expansion. Histopathological analysis revealed multiple fragments of S-100-positive cells, hemorrhage, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages. At last follow-up, 4 patients had clinically improved and 1 patient remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

ITH after VS radiosurgery is a rare phenomenon with a cumulative incidence rate of 0.26% in this series. Patient-tailored management in the form of observation or resection is based on patient presentation, acuity, and ITH size.

[Research progress on non-surgical treatment of vestibular schwannomas]

At present, the main treatment for vestibular schwannomas is surgery. Considering the risk of multiple complications from surgery and the subjective and objective conditions of patients, a non-surgical treatment modality, namely stereotactic radiotherapy, has gradually been included in the treatment of vestibular schwannomas. Studies have shown that Gamma Knife therapy has a more prominent therapeutic effect on smaller tumors and can alleviate facial nerve disorders caused by space occupying of tumor mass. Cyberknife not only has a better effect on tumor control, but also has an ideal retention rate for patients' auditory function. Proton beam therapy has also been gradually applied to the treatment of vestibular schwannomas, but the effect of treatment remains to be further studied. Drug therapy includes a variety of target inhibitors and anti-angiogenic drugs. At present, drug treatment focuses more on preclinical research. This article reviews the clinical research of various radiotherapy and the progress of drug treatment.