Decompressive craniectomy in trauma: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a surgical procedure in which a large section of the skull is removed, and the underlying dura mater is opened widely. After evacuating a traumatic acute subdural hematoma, a primary DC is typically performed if the brain is bulging or if brain swelling is expected over the next several days. However, a recent randomized trial found similar 12-month outcomes when primary DC was compared with craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma. Secondary removal of the bone flap was performed in 9% of the craniotomy group, but more wound complications occurred in the craniectomy group. Two further multicenter trials found that, whereas early neuroprotective bifrontal DC for mild to moderate intracranial hypertension is not superior to medical management, DC as a last-tier therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension leads to reduced mortality. Patients undergoing secondary last-tier DC are more likely to improve over time than those in the standard medical management group. The overall conclusion from the most up-to-date evidence is that secondary DC has a role in the management of intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury but is not a panacea. Therefore, the decision to offer this operation should be made on a case-by-case basis. Following DC, cranioplasty is warranted but not always feasible, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Consequently, a decompressive craniotomy, where the bone flap is allowed to "hinge" or "float," is sometimes used. Decompressive craniotomy is also an option in a subgroup of traumatic brain injury patients undergoing primary surgical evacuation when the brain is neither bulging nor relaxed. However, a high-quality randomized controlled trial is needed to delineate the specific indications and the type of decompressive craniotomy in appropriate patients.

Subgaleal drains may be associated with decreased infection following autologous cranioplasty: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Autologous bone is often the first choice in cranioplasty following a decompressive craniectomy. However, infection is a common complication, with reported rates up to 25%. While the incidence and management of infection are well documented, the risk factors associated with infection remain less clear. The current study aims to identify predictors of infection risk following autologous cranioplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty using cryopreserved autologous bone flaps between 2010 and 2020. Patient demographics and factors related to both surgeries and infection rates were recorded from patient records. Logistic regressions were conducted to determine which factors were implicated in the development of infection.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 126 patients underwent autologous cranioplasty. A total of 10 patients (7.9%) developed an infection following reconstruction, with half resulting in implant failure. We did not identify any significant risk factors for infection. Regression analysis identified placement of subgaleal drain following cranioplasty as a protective factor against the development of infection (OR: 0.16, p = 0.007). On average, drains remained in for 3 days, with no difference between the length of drains for those with infection vs. those without (p = 0.757).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates an infection rate of 7.9% in patients who receive an autologous cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy, which is consistent with previous data. Half (4%) of patients who experienced an infection ultimately required removal of the implant. While it is common practice for neurosurgeons to use drains to prevent hematomas and fluid collections, we found that subgaleal drain placement following cranioplasty was associated with decreased infection, thus demonstrating another benefit of a commonly used tool.

High-Density Porous Polyethylene Implant Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review of Outcomes

Porous polyethylene has been widely used in craniofacial reconstruction due to its biomechanical properties and ease of handling. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to summarize outcomes utilizing high-density porous polyethylene (HDPP) implants in cranioplasty. A literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify original studies with HDPP cranioplasty from inception to March 2023. Non-English articles, commentaries, absent indications or outcomes, and nonclinical studies were excluded. Data on patient demographics, indications, defect size and location, outcomes, and patient satisfaction were extracted. Summary statistics were calculated using weighted averages based on the available reported data. A total of 1089 patients involving 1104 cranioplasty procedures with HDPP were identified. Patients' mean age was 44.0 years (range 2 to 83 y). The mean follow-up duration was 32.0 months (range 2 wk to 8 y). Two studies comprising 17 patients (1.6%) included only pediatric patients. Alloplastic cranioplasty was required after treatment of cerebrovascular diseases (50.9%), tumor excision (32.0%), trauma (11.4%), trigeminal neuralgia/epilepsy (3.4%), and others such as abscesses/cysts (1.4%). The size of the defect ranged from 3 to 340 cm 2 . An overall postoperative complication rate of 2.3% was identified, especially in patients who had previously undergone surgery at the same site. When data were available, contour improvement and high patient satisfaction were reported in 98.8% and 98.3% of the patients. HDPP implants exhibit favorable outcomes for reconstruction of skull defects. Higher complication rates may be anticipated in secondary cranioplasty cases.

Design of customized implants and 3D printing of symmetric and asymmetric cranial cavities

A methodology has been developed in this work to design customized cranial implants from computed tomography (CT) scan images for symmetric as well as asymmetric defects. The two-dimensional CT scan images were converted into three-dimensional geometric models using software packages. Two cases of cranial cavities at different locations were considered for implant design using two different approaches. Case 1 is having a symmetric cranial cavity while Case 2 has an asymmetric frontal cranial cavity. The craniums with defects were 3D reconstructed. Customized cranial implants were made for the two cases. In Case 1, symmetry was used to design the cranial implant. Symmetry cannot be used in Case 2. In Case 2, the implant was designed by blending from the surface available adjacent to the missing portion of the cranium. 3D reconstructed bone models and customized implants were 3D printed in poly-lactic acid (PLA) using a fused deposition modeling process for form and fit evaluation. Finite element analysis was performed to compare the mechanical behavior of bone, and the two biomaterials - polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and Ti6Al4V. Static structural finite element analysis was performed to simulate the impact of falling off a bicycle with an impact on the cranial implants in the two cases. The load was modeled as a normal force acting on the surface of the implant. It was found that the stresses in the titanium alloy are comparable to those of PEEK for both the cases. However, the strains and deformation were found to be much smaller compared to those in PEEK. Therefore, the titanium alloy is the material of choice for both the cases among the materials under consideration. The designed implants are solid hence may face the challenge in bone ingrowth. In future studies, the implant can be made porous by incorporating a lattice structure to enhance osseointegration and promote bone ingrowth. Implants for both symmetric and asymmetric defect cases in cranium were successfully designed.

A 2-Year Prospective Study of Complication Rates After Cranioplasty: Is 8 Weeks' Interval Associated with Increased Complications?

BACKGROUND

The commonly observed complications after cranioplasty include infections, intracranial hemorrhage, and seizures. The timing of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy (DC) is still under debate, with literature available for both early and delayed cranioplasties. The objectives of this study were to note the overall complication rates and more specifically compare complications between 2 different time intervals.

METHODS

This was a 24-month, single-center, prospective study. Since timing is the most debated variable, the study cohort was divided into 2 groups (≤8 weeks and >8 weeks). Furthermore, other variables such as age, gender, etiology of DC, neurologic condition, and blood loss were correlated with complications.

RESULTS

A total of 104 cases were analyzed. Two thirds were traumatic etiology. The mean and median DC-cranioplasty intervals were 11.3 weeks (range 4-52 weeks) and 9 weeks, respectively. Seven complications (6.7%) were observed in 6 patients. There was no statistical difference observed between any of the variables and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that performing cranioplasty within 8 weeks of the initial DC surgery is safe and noninferior to cranioplasty performed after 8 weeks. Therefore if the general condition of the patient is satisfactory, we are of the opinion that an interval of 6-8 weeks from the primary DC is safe and a reasonable time frame for performing cranioplasty.

Optimal Timing of Cranioplasty and Predictors of Overall Complications After Cranioplasty: The Impact of Brain Collapse

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of cranioplasty (CP) and predictors of overall postoperative complications are still controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal timing of CP.

METHODS

Patients were divided into collapsed group and noncollapsed group based on brain collapse or not, respectively. Brain collapse volume was calculated in a 3-dimensional way. The primary outcomes were overall complications and outcomes at the 12-month follow-up after CP.

RESULTS

Of the 102 patients in this retrospective observation cohort study, 56 were in the collapsed group, and 46 were in the noncollapsed group. Complications were noted in 30.4% (n = 31), 24 (42.9%) patients in the collapsed group and 7 (15.2%) patients in the noncollapsed group, with a significant difference ( P = .003). Thirty-three (58.9%) patients had good outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0-3) in the collapsed group, and 34 (73.9%) patients had good outcomes in the noncollapsed group without a statistically significant difference ( P = .113). Brain collapse ( P = .005) and Karnofsky Performance Status score at the time of CP ( P = .025) were significantly associated with overall postoperative complications. The cut-off value for brain collapse volume was determined as 11.26 cm 3 in the receiver operating characteristic curve. The DC-CP interval was not related to brain collapse volume or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Brain collapse and lower Karnofsky Performance Status score at the time of CP were independent predictors of overall complications after CP. The optimal timing of CP may be determined by tissue window based on brain collapse volume instead of time window based on the decompressive craniectomy-CP interval.

Low-Cost 3-D-Printer-Assisted Personalized Cranioplasty Treatment: A Case Series of 14 Consecutive Patients

OBJECTIVE

The current study used polylactic acid molds [developed locally using three-dimensional printers and our software] and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) to perform cranioplasty of bone defects in technically demanding areas of the skull while ensuring ideal cosmetic results and functional recovery. The overall aim was to identify the ideal method for standard cranioplasty procedures METHODS: Polylactic acid duplicates of the skull defects were created for eligible patients, after which a two-part negative mold composed of plaster and silicone was used to form artificial bone with PMMA. Thereafter, cranioplasty was performed and the treatment success was assessed by evaluating the percentage of similarity objectively and the body image scale subjectively.

RESULTS

No surgical complications were seen to occur in the 14 patients included in the current study. Furthermore, the subjective and objective evaluation revealed a significant improvement in outcomes (p < 0.05). No postoperative complications were observed over a follow-up period of 6 months, except in 1 patient who exhibited late infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Cranioplasty operations were performed at an economical price of approximately US$50 dollars, suggesting that this method can be applied widely. Furthermore, preoperative preparation of the PMMA models can help reduce the duration of anesthesia and surgery which, in turn, will minimize the risk of surgical complications. Based on current knowledge in the field, we believe that this method represents the ideal technique.

Sonolucent Cranioplasty in Extracranial to Intracranial Bypass Surgery: Early Multicenter Experience of 44 Cases

BACKGROUND

The new sonolucent cranioplasty implant (clear polymethyl methacrylate, PMMA) adds functionality besides surgical reconstruction. One possible application uses the transcranioplasty ultrasound (TCUS) technique after PMMA cranioplasty to assess graft patency of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To report our early multicenter experience.

METHODS

This is a multicenter analysis of consecutive EC-IC bypass patients from 5 US centers (2019-2022) with closure postbypass using PMMA implant.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (median age 53 years, 68.2% females) were included. The most common indication for bypass was Moyamoya disease/syndrome (77.3%), and superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass was the most common procedure (79.5%). Pretreatment modified Rankin Scales of 0 and 1 to 2 were noted in 11.4% and 59.1% of patients, respectively. Intraoperative imaging for bypass patency involved a combination of modalities; Doppler was the most used modality (90.9%) followed by indocyanine green and catheter angiography (86.4% and 61.4%, respectively). Qualitative TCUS assessment of graft patency was feasible in all cases. Postoperative inpatient TCUS confirmation of bypass patency was recorded in 56.8% of the cases, and outpatient TCUS surveillance was recorded in 47.7%. There were no cases of bypass failure necessitating retreatment. Similarly, no implant-related complications were encountered in the cohort. Major complications requiring additional surgery occurred in 2 patients (4.6%) including epidural hematoma requiring evacuation (2.3%) and postoperative surgical site infection (2.3%) that was believed to be unrelated to the implant.

CONCLUSION

This multicenter study supports safety and feasibility of using sonolucent PMMA implant in EC-IC bypass surgery with the goal of monitoring bypass patency using TCUS.

Complications of Different Types of Cranioplasty and Identification of Risk Factors Associated with Cranioplasty at a Tertiary Care Centre: A Prospective Observational Study

Objective Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is an urgent procedure which is done to decrease intracranial pressure. A study of the complications would suggest measures to improve the care. This study was focused on analyzing the complications after cranioplasty (CP) and to identify risk factors that may be associated with the failure of the procedure.

Method: This study was conducted over 41 months at level-1 trauma center and medical college. It included patients undergoing CP for a defect arising out of previous DC or inability to replace the bone flap (Glasgow Coma Scale > 13, size > 5 cm, without surgical site infection). All patients underwent CT imaging before and after the procedure. The CP technique largely depended on the patients, based on the cost of prosthesis and availability.

Result: Hundred patients were included in the study. Postoperatively, total 22 patients suffered complications of which few had more than one complication. Titanium implant appeared to be a better implant, with no complication (p < 0.05). Complication was common in younger age group, chemically cured PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) and ethylene oxide) sterilized bone flap). Complications were higher among patients with multiple comorbidity and stroke patients.

Conclusion: Titanium flap had no complication and in case of autologous abdominal subcutaneous flap, apart from bone flap absorption, patients had no major complication. Therefore, both implants are preferred implants for CP. Heat-cured PMMA can be used in case of nonavailability of a better option, as it is economical feasible and can be molded at any dental lab.

Outcomes of Cranioplasty: A Single-Center Experience

Background Cranioplasty (CP) is a common cranial reconstructive procedure. It is performed after craniectomy due to various causes such as relieving increased intracranial pressure, infection, and tumor infiltration. Although CP is an easy procedure, it is associated with a high rate of complications. We aimed to retrospectively investigate the outcomes of CP at the King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah (KAMC-J). Methods This is a retrospective observational study that included all patients who had CP (first time or redo) at KAMC-J from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2020. Patients with congenital cranial malformation were excluded.  Result A total of 68 patients underwent CP. Of those, 23 (34%) had complications. The most common complication was infection (10.3%). Twelve of the 23 patients had major complications that necessitated reoperation. Of those 12, six underwent redo CP; three out of these six patients had further complications which were also managed surgically. On bivariate analysis, cranial defects over 50 cm² were associated with a higher rate of both infection and hydrocephalus (p=0.018) while the frontal site was associated with a higher rate of infection (p=0.014). Moreover, traumatic brain injury as an etiology was exclusively associated with post-cranioplasty hydrocephalus (p=0.03).  Conclusion Patients undergoing CP after craniectomy are prone to a considerably high rate of adverse outcomes. The overall rate of complications in this study was 34%, with an infection rate of 10.3% and a 1.5% mortality rate. Consistent with other studies, larger cranial defects as well as frontal sites have a higher rate of infection.

Beyond the abdominal and pelvic cavity: abdominal wall and spinal "Aunt Minnies"

Abdominal wall and spinal soft tissue findings are frequently encountered on CT or MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. Many of these entities have specific imaging findings, for which a definitive diagnosis can be made without the need for further work up. These abdominal wall and spinal findings may be diagnostically challenging for sub-specialized abdominal radiologists who are unfamiliar with their appearance and appropriate management. This review article describes and illustrates pathognomonic or characteristic abdominal wall and spinal pathologies, which reside outside the abdominopelvic cavity. The cases selected all have findings that allow a confident diagnosis without further imaging or intervention. The cases presented include myonecrosis, intramuscular abscess, myositis, iliopsoas bursitis, Morel-Lavallée lesion, hydrocele of canal of Nuck, Klippel Trenaunay Weber syndrome, neurofibroma with target sign, perineural cysts, filum terminale lipoma, calvarial bone flap, transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap, liposuction, and hidradenitis suppurativa, among others. Although not all-encompassing, this paper will help abdominal radiologists to accurately diagnose a variety of abdominal and pelvic extra-cavitary soft tissue pathologies by identifying key radiologic findings.

Rates of operative intervention for infection after synthetic or autologous cranioplasty: a National Readmissions Database analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical utilization and associated charges of autologous bone flap (ABF) versus synthetic flap (SF) cranioplasty and to characterize the postoperative infection risk of SF versus ABF using the National Readmissions Database (NRD).

METHODS

The authors used the publicly available NRD to identify index hospitalizations from October 2015 to December 2018 involving elective ABF or SF cranioplasty after traumatic brain injury (TBI) or stroke. Subsequent readmissions were further characterized if patients underwent neurosurgical intervention for treatment of infection or suspected infection. Survey Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess risk of readmission.

RESULTS

An estimated 2295 SF and 2072 ABF cranioplasties were performed from October 2015 to December 2018 in the United States. While the total number of cranioplasty operations decreased during the study period, the proportion of cranioplasties utilizing SF increased (p < 0.001), particularly in male patients (p = 0.011) and those with TBI (vs stroke, p = 0.012). The median total hospital charge for SF cranioplasty was $31,200 more costly than ABF cranioplasty (p < 0.001). Of all first-time readmissions, 20% involved surgical treatment for infectious reasons. Overall, 122 SF patients (5.3%) underwent surgical treatment of infection compared with 70 ABF patients (3.4%) on readmission. After accounting for confounders using a multivariable Cox model, female patients (vs male, p = 0.003), those discharged nonroutinely (vs discharge to home or self-care, p < 0.001), and patients who underwent SF cranioplasty (vs ABF, p = 0.011) were more likely to be readmitted for reoperation. Patients undergoing cranioplasty during more recent years (e.g., 2018 vs 2015) were less likely to be readmitted for reoperation because of infection (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

SFs are increasingly replacing ABFs as the material of choice for cranioplasty, despite their association with increased hospital charges. Female sex, nonroutine discharge, and SF cranioplasty are associated with increased risk for reoperation after cranioplasty.

Impact of Cranioplasty on Rehabilitation Course of Patients with Traumatic or Hemorrhagic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Some authors have hypothesized that cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy (DC) could positively influence functional recovery through several mechanisms. However, only a few studies with small sample sizes have investigated the effects of cranioplasty on functional recovery. Our study aims at evaluating the role of post-DC cranioplasty in influencing the functional recovery in a large cohort of patients with different etiologies of acquired brain injury (ABI).

METHODS

This retrospective study consecutively enrolled 253 patients with ABI, consisting of 108 adults who underwent post-DC cranioplasty and 145 adults who did not. All the subjects underwent a 6-month individual rehabilitation program. Demographic data, etiology, classification and anatomical site of brain injury, neurological and functional assessment at baseline and on discharge, and number of deaths during hospitalization were recorded.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 145 patients (57.3%) and 108 patients (42.7%) had, respectively, a hemorrhagic stroke (HS) and a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Only in the patients with TBI cranioplasty emerged as an independent predictor of better functional outcome in terms of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) total score at discharge (β = 0.217, p = 0.001) and of the FIM variation during rehabilitation (ΔFIM) (β = 0.315, p = 0.001). Conversely, in the case of HS, no associations were found between post-DC cranioplasty and functional recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-DC cranioplasty was associated with better functional recovery six months after TBI but not in the patients with HS. Although the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying HS are different from those of TBI and possibly play a role in the different outcomes between the two groups, further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying the observed differences.

Comparison of autograft and implant cranioplasty in pediatrics: A meta-analysis

Background:

Cranioplasty in pediatrics is quite challenging and intricated. The ideal material for it is still debatable until now due to the limited study comparing autologous and implant grafts. This meta-analytic study was conducted to evaluate the risk of infection and revision in pediatric patients after autograft and implant cranioplasty.

Methods:

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A thorough literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and ScienceDirect database. Articles published from 2000 to 2021 were selected systematically using PRISMA based on the predetermined eligibility criteria. The relevant data were, then, analyzed and discussed.

Results:

A total of four publications investigating the outcome of autograft and implant cranioplasty were included and reviewed. Postoperative infection and revision rate after 126 cranioplasty procedures (both autograft or implant) from 119 patients below 21 years during time frame of study were analyzed. This meta-analysis study showed that the rate of infection and revision after cranioplasty were not different between the autograft and implant groups.

Conclusion:

Autograft and implant cranioplasty have no significant difference in postoperatively infection and revision rate. This study showed that cranioplasty using implant is a plausible option in pediatric patients with cranial defects, depending on the patients’ condition due to similar outcome with autograft cranioplasty. Further studies with larger population and more specific details are necessary to determine the comparison of autograft and implant material in cranioplasty procedure.

Outcomes and Associated Complications of Cranioplasty following Craniectomy in Brunei Darussalam

Objective Cranioplasty, commonly performed after decompressive craniectomy, is associated with significant complications. We aim to characterize the outcomes and complications post cranioplasty performed in Brunei Darussalam.

Methods and Materials We conducted a nationwide retrospective study of the patients who underwent cranioplasty. Patients who underwent cranioplasty by the Neurosurgical Department from January 2014 to June 2019 were included. Patients were excluded if they did not have a minimum of 30-days follow-up or the initial cranioplasty was performed elsewhere. Outcomes including complications post cranioplasty and 30-day and 1-year failure rates were assessed. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 20 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA). The χ2 test, Student's t-test, and the Mann–Whitney U test were performed for nominal, normally, and non-normally distributed variables, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictors for complications and cranioplasty failure.

Results Seventy-seven patients with a median age of 48 (interquartile range, 37–61) years were included. Most cranioplasties used autologous bone (70/77, 90.9%). Infection and overall complication rates were 3.9% and 15.6%, respectively. Cranioplasty failure (defined as removal or revision of cranioplasty) rate was 9.1%. Previous cranial site infection post craniectomy was associated with cranioplasty failure (odds ratio: 12.2, 95% confidence interval [1.3, 114.0], p=0.028).

Conclusions Cranioplasty is generally associated with significant complications, including reoperation for implant failure. We highlighted that autologous bone cranioplasties can be performed with an acceptable low rate of infection, making it a viable first option for implant material.

The Use of the Three-Dimensional Printed Polyether Ether Ketone Implant in Secondary Craniosynostosis Revision

BACKGROUND

Skull deformities may be seen in patients years after craniosynostosis correction. These deformities cause psychosocial distress in affected patients. In this series, the authors describe the use of patient specific polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants for correction of skull deformities after cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A chart review was conducted for 3 revision procedures performed by 1 plastic surgeon in collaboration with 1 neurosurgeon, both affiliated with Northwell Health. Preoperative computed tomography scans were used to design three-dimensional (3D) printed PEEK implants manufactured by KLS Martin. Implants were used to correct frontal and orbital asymmetry and skull deformities in each patient. Outcomes were assessed at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-operation.

RESULTS

Two males and 1 female, ages 13, 17, and 19, underwent revision cranioplasty or orbital rim reconstruction using a custom, single piece 3D printed PEEK implant. All 3 patients underwent cranial vault remodeling in infancy; 1 was treated for coronal craniosynostosis and 2 were treated for metopic craniosynostosis. Revision cranioplasty operative times were 90, 105, and 147 minutes, with estimated blood loss of 45 mL, 75 mL, and 150 mL, respectively. One patient went home on post op day 1 and 2 patients went home on post op day 2. All patients had an immediate improvement in structural integrity and cranial contour, and all patients were pleased with their aesthetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

Custom 3D printed PEEK implants offer a single piece solution in revision cranioplasty surgery to correct skull deformities after cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors involved in bone flap resorption after decompressive craniectomy

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is effective in controlling increasing intracranial pressure determined by a wide range of conditions, mainly traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke, and the subsequent cranioplasty (CP) displays potential therapeutic benefit in terms of overall neurological function. While autologous bone flap (ABF) harvested at the time of DC is the ideal material for skull defect reconstruction, it carries several risks. Aseptic bone flap resorption (BFR) is one of the most common complications, often leading to surgical failure. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature and carry out a meta-analysis of possible factors involved in BFR in patients undergoing ABF cranioplasty after DC. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Different medical databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) were screened for eligible scientific reports until April 30th 2021. The following data were collected for meta-analysis to assess their role in BFR: sex, age, the interval time between DC and CP, the presence of systemic factors, the etiology determining the DC, CP surgical time, CP features, VP shunt placement, CP infection. Studies including pediatric patients or with less than 50 patients were excluded. Fifteen studies were included. There was a statistically significant increased incidence of BFR in patients with CPF > 2 compared to patients with CPF ≤ 2 (54.50% and 22.76% respectively, p = 0.010). TBI was a significantly more frequent etiology in the BFR group compared to patients without BFR (61.95% and 47.58% respectively, p < 0.001). Finally, patients with BFR were significantly younger than patients without BFR (39.12 ± 15.36 years and 47.31 ± 14.78 years, respectively, p < 0.001). The funnel plots were largely symmetrical for all the studied factors. Bone flap fragmentation, TBI etiology, and young age significantly increase the risk of bone resorption. Further studies are needed to strengthen our results and to clarify if, in those cases, a synthetic implant for primary CP should be recommended.

Outcomes of Cranioplasty Strategies for High-Risk Complex Cranial Defects: A 10-Year Experience

INTRODUCTION

Although the literature contains reports of the risks and complications of calvarial vault reconstruction for acquired defects, there are few publications addressing the specific patient population who require such reconstructions in cases preceded by prior infection, radiation, massive associated soft tissue trauma, and so on. We define such clinical presentations as a hostile environment for large surface area reconstruction. Our objective is to compare the safety and efficacy of autologous bone and alloplastic reconstruction in hostile cranial defects.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of patients who underwent cranioplasty of a hostile site at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between January 2008 and December 2018 was performed. The patients were stratified into 3 groups based on the type of implant used: autogenous (bone), alloplastic (polyetheretherketone [PEEK], titanium, polymethyl methacrylate), or mixed (combination of bone and prosthetic). The primary outcome metric was a complication in the year after cranioplasty, identified by implant failure, necrosis, or infection. Statistical analysis included t tests and χ2 tests where appropriate using SPSS.

RESULTS

There were 55 total cases in this period: 27 autogenous, 23 alloplastic, and 5 mixed. The purely autogenous group had the highest complication rate (44%), and the alloplastic group had the lowest complication rate (38%), which was not statistically different between the 3 groups (P = 0.121). When stratified by specific material used for reconstruction (27 bone, 14 PEEK, 10 titanium, and 5 polymethyl methacrylate), overall complication rate was statistically significant (P = 0.009, χ2 test), with PEEK implants having the lowest complication rate (21%).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis interestingly found that in the setting of hostile cranial defects, cranioplasties would benefit from the use of prosthetic implants instead of autologous bone grafts, not only for avoidance of donor site morbidity but also for a decrease in overall complications.

Surgical Treatment of Radiation-Induced Late-Onset Scalp Wound in Patients Who Underwent Brain Tumor Surgery: Lessons from a Case Series

Objective. The management of late-onset scalp wounds following irradiation is troublesome, especially in patients with a surgical history of intracranial neoplasms. It, insidiously, starts with wound dehiscence or discharge and never heals spontaneously without appropriate surgical treatment. Nevertheless, definite treatment guidelines have not yet been established. Here, we present our clinical experience with radiation-induced scalp wounds and suggest a surgical principle for their treatment. Patients and Methods. The medical records of 13 patients with brain tumors, who were treated for intractable scalp wounds after irradiation between January 2000 and August 2015, were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients underwent a craniotomy for brain tumor resection. Surgical treatment for a late-onset scalp wound was decided based on the “reconstructive ladder” and according to the status of bone flap and scalp tissue. The patients’ clinical characteristics and information regarding irradiation, surgery, and postoperative complications were recorded. Results. Scalp wounds developed 4.4 years, on average, after the completion of irradiation. Revision operations were performed an average of 2.3 times, and 6 patients (46%) required more than 2 operations. The bone flap was removed in 11 patients (84.6%) to achieve complete wound healing. Among them, 3 patients underwent a cranioplasty using artificial materials, but 2 patients underwent removal due to recurrent wound problems. Conclusions. Postirradiation scalp wounds are difficult to treat and have a high risk of recurrence. If osteoradionecrosis is suspected, the bone flap should be removed. It is important to debride unhealthy tissues aggressively and cover defects with robust tissue.

Materials Used in Cranial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty is a common neurological procedure with complication rates ranging from 20% to 50%. It is hypothesized that the risks of various complications are impacted by which material is used for cranioplasty.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate existing literature comparing rates of complications following cranioplasty using different materials including autologous bone, hydroxyapatite, methyl methacrylate (MMA), demineralized bone matrix, polyetheretherketone, titanium, or composite materials.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for relevant articles published between 2010 and 2020. After screening, 35 articles were included. Outcomes included infection, wound problems, poor cosmesis, overall complications, duration of surgery, and length of stay. For each outcome, a frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted to compare materials used.

RESULTS

The risk of infection was 1.62 times higher when MMA was used compared to autologous bone (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.45). Length of stay following cranioplasty was on average 3.62 days shorter when titanium was used compared autologous bone (95% CI -6.26 to -0.98). The networks constructed for other outcomes demonstrated moderate to substantial between-study heterogeneity, wide confidence intervals, and no significant differences between materials.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of existing literature on this topic is relatively poor, almost exclusively comprised of single-center retrospective studies. There is currently not strong enough evidence available to make comprehensive conclusions regarding the risk-profiles of various cranioplasty materials across multiple outcomes. Prospective randomized trials are necessary to confirm the significant results found in this analysis and to further elucidate the differential risks of various cranioplasty materials.

Cranioplasty: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is an operation where a large section of the skull is removed to accommodate brain swelling. Patients who survive will usually require subsequent reconstruction of the skull using either their own bone or an artificial prosthesis, known as cranioplasty. Cranioplasty restores skull integrity but can also improve neurological function. Standard care following DC consists of the performance of cranioplasty several months later as historically, there was a concern that earlier cranioplasty may increase the risk of infection. However, recent systematic reviews have challenged this and have demonstrated that an early cranioplasty (within three months after DC) may enhance neurological recovery. However, patients are often transferred to a rehabilitation unit following their acute index admission and before their cranioplasty. A better understanding of the pathophysiological effects of cranioplasty and the relationship of timing and complications would enable more focused patient tailored rehabilitation programs, thus maximizing the benefit following cranioplasty. This may maximise recovery potential, possibly resulting in improved functional and cognitive gains, enhancement of quality of life and potentially reducing longer-term care needs. This narrative review aims to update multi-disciplinary team regarding cranioplasty, including its history, pathophysiological consequences on recovery, complications, and important clinical considerations both in the acute and rehabilitation settings.

The utility of routine autologous bone-flap swab cultures in predicting post-cranioplasty infection

Objective:

To evaluate the utility of autologous bone-flap swab cultures performed at the time of cranioplasty in predicting postcranioplasty surgical site infection (SSI).

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Participants:

Patients undergoing craniectomy (with bone-flap storage in tissue bank), followed by delayed autologous bone-flap replacement cranioplasty between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2020.

Setting:

Tertiary-care academic hospital.

Methods:

We framed the bone-flap swab culture taken at the time of cranioplasty as a diagnostic test for predicting postcranioplasty SSI. We calculated, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios.

Results:

Among 282 unique eligible cases, 16 (5.6%) developed SSI after cranioplasty. A high percentage of bone-flap swab cultures were positive at the time of craniectomy (66.7%) and cranioplasty (59.5%). Most organisms from bone-flap swab cultures were Cutibacterium acnes or coagulase-negative staphylococci (76%–85%), and most SSI pathogens were methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (38%). Bone-flap swab culture had poor sensitivity (0.07; 95% CI, 0.01–0.31), specificity (0.4; 95% CI, 0.34–0.45), and positive likelihood ratio (0.12) for predicting postcranioplasty SSI.

Conclusion:

Overall, autologous bone-flap swab cultures performed at the time of cranioplasty have poor utility in predicting postcranioplasty SSI. Eliminating this low-value practice would result in significant workload reductions and associated healthcare costs.

Adaptive Mechanism for Designing a Personalized Cranial Implant and Its 3D Printing Using PEEK

The rehabilitation of the skull's bones is a difficult process that poses a challenge to the surgical team. Due to the range of design methods and the availability of materials, the main concerns are the implant design and material selection. Mirror-image reconstruction is one of the widely used implant reconstruction techniques, but it is not a feasible option in asymmetrical regions. The ideal design approach and material should result in an implant outcome that is compact, easy to fit, resilient, and provides the perfect aesthetic and functional outcomes irrespective of the location. The design technique for the making of the personalized implant must be easy to use and independent of the defect's position on the skull. As a result, this article proposes a hybrid system that incorporates computer tomography acquisition, an adaptive design (or modeling) scheme, computational analysis, and accuracy assessment. The newly developed hybrid approach aims to obtain ideal cranial implants that are unique to each patient and defect. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is chosen to fabricate the implant because it is a viable alternative to titanium implants for personalized implants, and because it is simpler to use, lighter, and sturdy enough to shield the brain. The aesthetic result or the fitting accuracy is adequate, with a maximum deviation of 0.59 mm in the outside direction. The results of the biomechanical analysis demonstrate that the maximum Von Mises stress (8.15 MPa), Von Mises strain (0.002), and deformation (0.18 mm) are all extremely low, and the factor of safety is reasonably high, highlighting the implant's load resistance potential and safety under high loading. Moreover, the time it takes to develop an implant model for any cranial defect using the proposed modeling scheme is very fast, at around one hour. This study illustrates that the utilized 3D reconstruction method and PEEK material would minimize time-consuming alterations while also improving the implant's fit, stability, and strength.

Two-center validation of the Oulu resorption score for bone flap resorption after autologous cranioplasty

OBJECTIVE

Autologous bone has been the gold standard of cranioplasty materials for decades. Unique to autologous cranioplasty, bone flap resorption is a poorly understood and unclearly defined complication. Even further, it has been unclear, whether the resorption process eventually stabilizes over time. Thus, the sufficient follow-up period after autologous cranioplasty is unknown. The Oulu Resorption Score (ORS) is a straight-forward classification system for the radiological interpretation of bone flap resorption. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the reliability of the ORS using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and to assess the temporal progression of the resorption process.

METHODS

We identified 108 consecutive autologous cranioplasty patients treated between 2005 and 2018 in two tertiary referral centers. All 365 head CT scans the patients had undergone were evaluated using the ORS in a blinded, independent two-center setting. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were calculated. The ORS was applied to study the temporal progression of the resorption process.

RESULTS

The intra-observer reliability of the ORS was excellent (ICC 0.94, 95%CI 0.93-0.95). Inter-observer reliability was good-to-excellent (ICCs 0.87 and 0.89, 95%CIs 0.84-0.89 and 0.87-0.91, respectively). In scatterplot smoothing analyses, the progression of bone flap resorption appeared to stabilize 12-24 months after cranioplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

ORS is the only validated radiological tool for the standardized analysis of bone flap resorption after autologous cranioplasty. Evaluated using the ORS, the resorption process seemed to stabilize during the first two postoperative years after cranioplasty, suggesting that the sufficient follow-up time after autologous cranioplasty is two years.

Predictive Factors of Surgical Site Infection Following Cranioplasty: A Study Including 3D Printed Implants

In patients who have undergone decompressive craniectomy (DC), subsequent cranioplasty is required to reconstruct cranial defects. Surgical site infection (SSI) following cranioplasty is a devastating complication that can lead to cranioplasty failure. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to identify predictive factors for SSI following cranioplasty by reviewing procedures performed over a 10-year period. A retrospective analysis was performed for all patients who underwent cranioplasty following DC between 2010 and 2020 at a single institution. The patients were divided into two groups, non-SSI and SSI, in order to identify clinical variables that are significantly correlated with SSI following cranioplasty. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were then performed to identify predictive factors associated with SSI following cranioplasty. A total of 172 patients who underwent cranioplasty, including 48 who received customized three-dimensional (3D) printed implants, were enrolled in the present study. SSI occurred in 17 patients (9.9%). Statistically significant differences were detected between the non-SSI and SSI groups with respect to presence of fluid collections on CT scans before and after cranioplasty. Presence of fluid collections on computed tomography (CT) scan before (p = 0.0114) and after cranioplasty (p < 0.0000) showed significant association with event-free survival rate for SSI. In a univariate analysis, significant predictors for SSI were fluid collection before (p = 0.0172) and after (p < 0.0001) cranioplasty. In a multivariate analysis, only the presence of fluid collection after cranioplasty was significantly associated with the occurrence of SSI (p < 0.0001). The present study investigated predictive factors that may help identify patients at risk of SSI following cranioplasty and provide guidelines associated with the procedure. Based on the results of the present study, only the presence of fluid collection on CT scan after cranioplasty was significantly associated with the occurrence of SSI. Further investigation with long-term follow-up and large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm our conclusions.

Syndrome of the trephined: clinical spectrum, risk factors, and impact of cranioplasty on neurologic recovery in a prospective cohort

Syndrome of the trephined (SoT) is an underrecognized complication after decompressive craniectomy. We aimed to investigate SoT incidence, clinical spectrum, risk factors, and the impact of the cranioplasty on neurologic recovery. Patients undergoing a large craniectomy (> 80 cm²) and cranioplasty were prospectively evaluated using modified Rankin score (mRS), cognitive (attention/processing speed, executive function, language, visuospatial), motor (Motricity Index, Jamar dynamometer, postural score, gait assessment), and radiologic evaluation within four days before and after a cranioplasty. The primary outcome was SoT, diagnosed when a neurologic improvement was observed after the cranioplasty. The secondary outcome was a good neurologic outcome (mRS 0–3) 4 days and 90 days after the cranioplasty. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the risk factors for SoT and the impact of cranioplasty timing on neurologic recovery. We enrolled 40 patients with a large craniectomy; 26 (65%) developed SoT and improved after the cranioplasty. Brain trauma, hemorrhagic lesions, and shifting of brain structures were associated with SoT. After cranioplasty, a shift towards a good outcome was observed within 4 days (p = 0.025) and persisted at 90 days (p = 0.005). Increasing delay to cranioplasty was associated with decreased odds of improvement when adjusting for age and baseline disability (odds ratio 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93–0.99, p = 0.012). In conclusion, SoT is frequent after craniectomy and interferes with neurologic recovery. High suspicion of SoT should be exercised in patients who fail to progress or have a previous trauma, hemorrhage, or shifting of brain structures. Performing the cranioplasty earlier was associated with improved and quantifiable neurologic recovery.

Predictive Value of Swab Cultures for Cryopreserved Flaps During Delayed Cranioplasties

OBJECTIVE

To assess the predictive value of swab cultures of cryopreserved skull flaps during cranioplasties for surgical site infections (SSIs).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent delayed cranioplasties with cryopreserved autografts between 2009 and 2017. The results of cultures obtained from swabs and infected surgical sites were assessed. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of swab cultures for SSIs were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study included 422 patients categorized into two groups, swab and nonswab, depending on whether swab cultures were implemented during cranioplasties. The overall infection rate was 7.58%. No difference was seen in infection rates between groups. There were 18 false-positive and no true-positive swab culture results. All bacteria between swab cultures and SSI cultures were discordant. Meanwhile, there were 19 false-negative swab cultures. The results showed high specificity but low sensitivity for swab cultures to predict SSI occurrence and the pathogens.

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to low accuracy and sensitivity, swab cultures of cryopreserved autografts should not be routinely performed during delayed cranioplasties.

Factors predicting complications following cranioplasty

This study aimed to identify factors that predict complications following cranioplasty, by conducting a retrospective cohort study at a large tertiary care center. Electronic databases were searched to identify all patients who underwent cranioplasty at our institution. Baseline demographics, perioperative variables, and outcomes were extracted. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with cranioplasty complications. Of the 92 included patients, 15 (16.3%) experienced one or more complications, with 11 (73.3%) experiencing complication within 30 days of cranioplasty. Patients aged ≤60 had decreased odds of all-cause complication (OR 0.058; 95% CI 0.008-0.434) and cranioplasty graft removal (OR 0.035; 95% CI 0.004-0.321) on multivariate analysis. Titanium mesh cranioplasties were associated with increased odds of all-cause complication (OR 19.776; 95% CI 1.021-382.901), and cranioplasty removal (OR 29.780; 95% CI 1.330-666.878). A longer craniectomy-cranioplasty interval was associated with increased odds of cranioplasty removal (OR 1.005; 95% CI 1.000-1.010). An initial craniectomy indication of cerebral infarction was associated with decreased odds of all-cause complication (OR 0.042; 95% CI 0.002-0.876) and cranioplasty removal (OR 0.032; 95% CI 0.001-0.766). Elderly patients may require more aggressive follow-up and antibiotic prophylaxis in the postoperative period following cranioplasty. Additionally, avoiding the use of titanium mesh cranioplasties and prolonged craniectomy-cranioplasty intervals may further reduce complications.

First Report of a Multicenter Prospective Registry of Cranioplasty in the United Kingdom and Ireland

BACKGROUND

There are many questions that remain unanswered regarding outcomes following cranioplasty including the timing of cranioplasty following craniectomy as well as the material used.

OBJECTIVE

To establish and evaluate 30-d outcomes for all cranial reconstruction procedures in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland through a prospective multicenter cohort study.

METHODS

Patients undergoing cranioplasty insertion or revision between June 1, 2019 and November 30, 2019 in 25 neurosurgical units were included. Data collected include demographics, craniectomy date and indication, cranioplasty material and date, and 30-d outcome.

RESULTS

In total, 313 operations were included, consisting of 255 new cranioplasty insertions and 58 revisions. Of the new insertions, the most common indications for craniectomy were traumatic brain injury (n = 110, 43%), cerebral infarct (n = 38, 15%), and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 30, 12%). The most common material was titanium (n = 163, 64%). Median time to cranioplasty was 244 d (interquartile range 144-385), with 37 new insertions (15%) within or equal to 90 d. In 30-d follow-up, there were no mortalities. There were 14 readmissions, with 10 patients sustaining a wound infection within 30 d (4%). Of the 58 revisions, the most common reason was due to infection (n = 33, 59%) and skin breakdown (n = 13, 23%). In 41 (71%) cases, the plate was removed during the revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study is the largest prospective study of cranioplasty representing the first results from the UK Cranial Reconstruction Registry, a first national registry focused on cranioplasty with the potential to address outstanding research questions for this procedure.

The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty (CP) is associated with high complication rates compared to other common neurosurgical procedures. Several graft materials are used for CP, which may contribute to the high complication rates, but data in the literature regarding the influence of graft material on post-CP outcomes are inconsistent making it difficult to determine if, when, and to what extent the graft material impacts the rate of perioperative complications. There is an increased demand to identify and develop superior graft materials.

OBJECTIVE

To review and compare the indications, risks, complications, and patient results associated with the use of different graft materials for cranial reconstructions.

DESIGN

A search through EBSCOhost was conducted using the keywords "craniectomy" or "decompressive craniectomy," "cranioplasty," and "materials." The search was limited to literature published in the English language from 2005 until the present. Ultimately, 69 articles were included in this review. Due to the heterogeneity of the study populations, results, statistical analyses, and collecting methods, no statistical analyses could be performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Several graft materials have been adapted for use in cranial reconstructions with inconsistent results making it unclear if or when one material may be indicated over others. Advances in computer-aided design have led to improved patient-specific implants, but the ideal graft material is still being sought after in ongoing research efforts. Reviewing materials currently available, as well as those in clinical trials, is important to identify the limitations associated with different implants and to guide future research.

Decompressive Craniectomy and Risk of Wound Infection After Microsurgical Treatment of Ruptured Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Owing to prolonged hospitalization and the complexity of care required for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), these patients have a high risk of complications. The risk for wound infection after microsurgical treatment for aSAH was analyzed.

METHODS

All patients who underwent microsurgical treatment for aSAH between August 1, 2007, and July 31, 2019, and were recorded in the Post-Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial database were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were analyzed for risk factors for wound infection after treatment.

RESULTS

Of 594 patients who underwent microsurgical treatment for aSAH, 23 (3.9%) had wound infections. There was no significant difference in age between patients with wound infection and patients without infection (mean, 52.6 ± 12.2 years vs. 54.2 ± 4.0 years; P = 0.45). The presence of multiple comorbidities (including diabetes, tobacco use, and obesity), external ventricular drain, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, pneumonia, or urinary tract infection was not associated with an increased risk for wound infection. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in mean operative time between patients with wound infection and those without infection (280 ± 112 minutes vs. 260 ± 92 minutes; P = 0.38). Patients who required decompressive craniectomy (DC) were at increased risk of wound infection (odds ratio, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-14.1; P = 0.002). Among the 23 total infections, 9 were diagnosed following cranioplasty after DC.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical treatment for aSAH is associated with a relatively low risk of wound infection. However, patients undergoing DC may be at an increased risk for infection. Additional attention and comprehensive wound care are warranted for these patients.

Complication Rates in Early Versus Late Cranioplasty-A 14-Year Single-Center Case Series

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty (CP) following decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a common neurosurgical procedure for cranial cosmesis and protection. There is uncertainty regarding the complication rates and potential benefits related to the timing of CP.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of the timing of CP on complication rates for different etiologies of DC.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all CP cases between 2004 and 2018 for traumatic and nontraumatic indications of DC. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and complications were collected. Early and late CP were defined as replacement of the bone flap at ≤90 and >90 d following DC, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 278 patients were included, receiving 81 early and 197 late CPs. When analyzing all patients, early CP was associated with a statistically significant higher odds of any complication (odds ratio [OR]: 3.25, P < .001), reoperation (OR: 2.57, P = .019), hydrocephalus (OR: 6.03, P = .003), and symptomatic extra-axial collections (OR: 9.22, P = .003). Subgroup analysis demonstrated statistically significant higher odds of these complications only for the CP trauma subgroup, but not the nontrauma subgroup. The odds of complications postCP demonstrated a statistically significant decrease of 4.4% for each week after DC (Unit Odds Ratio [U-OR]: 0.956, P = .0363).

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective series, early CP was associated with higher odds of postoperative complications compared to late CP in the trauma subgroup. Greater care should be taken in preoperative planning and increased vigilance postoperatively for complications with this potentially more vulnerable subpopulation. Future prospective controlled trials are needed to elucidate optimal timing for CP.

Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound

If wounds are infected with bacteria resistant to an empirical antibiotic regimen, effective wound treatment will be delayed. This can delay wound healing and lengthen hospital stays, increasing the costs to patients. Long-term antibiotic use can also result in minor and major complications, such as diarrhea, antibiotic resistance, or life-threatening leukopenia. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria make wound treatment even more difficult. Traditionally, surgeons thought that adequate infection control should be established before soft tissue coverage. However, wounds infected by MDR do not heal well with this traditional method and there are no optimal treatment guidelines for MDR bacteria-contaminated wounds.We reviewed 203 patients who underwent vascularized flap surgery from 2012 to 2019 to cover wounds. Class IV and I wounds were compared according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classification. Class IV was further classified as antibiotic-resistant (ARB) and antibiotic-sensitive (ASB) bacteria. Wound size, mode, location, pathogens, healing time, and basic demographics were evaluated. Data were compared using Cramer's V and one-way ANOVA or independent t tests.The average healing time was longer in the ARB (19.7 [range 7-44] days) and ASB (17.9 [range 2-36] days) groups than in the Clean group (16.5 [range 7-28] days). Healing time differed in the 3 groups (P = .036). It was longer in the class IV group than in the class I group (P = .01). However, it was not statistically different between the ARB and ASB groups (P = .164).In our study the difference in healing time was small when vascularized tissue transfer was done in ARB-infected wound compared with ASB-infected and clean wound. It is necessary to perform surgery using vascularized tissue for the infected wound of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Complications of Cranioplasty in Relation to Material: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty is a ubiquitous neurosurgical procedure consisting of reconstruction of a pre-existing calvarial defect. Many materials are available, including polymethylmethacrylate in hand-moulded (hPMMA) and prefabricated (pPMMA) form, hydroxyapatite (HA), polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium (Ti).

OBJECTIVE

To perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess the relationship between materials and complications of cranioplasty.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 1990 to February 14, 2021. Studies detailing rates of any of infections, implant exposure, or revision surgery were included. A frequentist NMA was performed for each complication. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for each material pair.

RESULTS

A total of 3620 abstracts were screened and 31 full papers were included. Surgical revision was reported in 18 studies and occurred in 316/2032 cases (14%; 95% CI 11-17). PEEK had the lowest risk of re-operation with a rate of 8/157 (5%; 95% CI 0-11) in 5 studies, superior to autografts (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.07-0.57), hPMMA (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.07-0.60), Ti (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.92), and pPMMA (RR 0.14; 95% CI 0.04-0.51). Revision rate was 131/684 (19%; 95% CI 13-25; 10 studies) in autografts, 61/317 (18%; 95%CI 9-28; 7 studies) in hPMMA, 84/599 (13%; 95% CI 7-19; 11 studies) in Ti, 7/59 (9%; 95% CI 1-23; 3 studies) in pPMMA, and 25/216 (12%; 95% CI 4-24; 4 studies) in HA. Infection occurred in 463/4667 (8%; 95% CI 6-11) and implant exposure in 120/1651 (6%; 95% CI 4-9).

CONCLUSION

PEEK appears to have the lowest risk of cranioplasty revision, but further research is required to determine the optimal material.

Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing for performing cranioplasty and its effect on functional outcome remains debatable. Multiple confounding factors may come into role; including the material used, surgical technique, cognitive assessment tools, and the overall complications. The aim of this study is to assess the neurological outcome and postoperative complications in patients who underwent early versus late cranioplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the neurological outcome and postoperative complications in patients who underwent cranioplasty between 2005 and 2018 at a Level l trauma center. Early and late cranioplasties were defined as surgeries performed within and more than 90 days of decompressive craniectomy, respectively. The Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) and modified Rankin scale (mRS), recorded within 1 week of cranioplasty, were used to assess the neurological outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 101 cases of cranioplasty were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 31.4 ± 13.9 years. Most patients (n = 86; 85.1%) were male. The mean GOS for all patients was 4.0 ± 1.0. The mean mRS was 2.2 ± 1.78. Hydrocephalus was noted in 18 patients (early, n = 6; late, n = 12; P = 0.48). Seizures developed in 28 patients (early, n = 12; late, n = 16; P = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

The neurological outcome in patients who underwent early versus late cranioplasty is almost identical. The differences in the rates of overall postoperative complications between early versus late cranioplasty were statistically insignificant. The optimal timing for performing cranioplasty is mainly dependent on the resolution of cerebral swelling.

Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a common neurosurgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), as well as malignant stroke, malignancy and infection. DC necessitates subsequent cranioplasty. There are significant demographic differences between TBI and non-TBI patients undergoing cranioplasty, which may influence their relative risk profiles for infection, aseptic bone flap resorption (aBFR) and re-operation.

OBJECTIVE

Perform a meta-analysis to determine the relative infection, aBFR and re-operation risk profiles of TBI patients as compared to other indications for DC.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar were searched until 26/11/2020. Studies detailing rates of infection, re-operation and/or aBFR in specific materials and the post-TBI population were included, while studies in paediatrics or craniosynostosis repair were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included. There was no difference in relative risk of infection between TBI and non-TBI cohorts (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57-1.17), with insignificant heterogeneity (I² = 33%). TBI was a risk factor for aBFR (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.25-1.89), with no significant heterogeneity (I² = 13%). TBI was a risk factor for re-operation in the autologous sub-group (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.11) but not in the alloplastic sub-group (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.34-2.18). Heterogeneity was insignificant (I² = 11%).

CONCLUSION

TBI is a risk factor for aBFR and re-operation following cranioplasty. Use of an alloplastic graft for primary cranioplasty in these patients may partially mitigate this increased risk.

Complications of cranioplasty in relationship to traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Despite being a common procedure, cranioplasty (CP) is associated with a variety of serious, at times lethal, complications. This study explored the relationship between the initial injury leading to decompressive craniectomy (DC) and the rates and types of complications after subsequent CP. It specifically compared between traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and patients undergoing CP after DC for other indications.A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases using PRISMA guidelines was performed to include case-control studies, cohorts, and clinical trials reporting complication data for CP after DC. Information about the patients' characteristics and the rates of overall and specific complications in TBI and non-TBI patients was extracted, summarized, and analyzed.A total of 59 studies, including the authors' institutional experience, encompassing 9264 patients (4671 TBI vs. 4593 non-TBI) met the inclusion criteria; this total also included 149 cases from our institutional series. The results of the analysis of the published series are shown both with and without our series 23 studies reported overall complications, 40 reported infections, 10 reported new-onset seizures, 13 reported bone flap resorption (BFR), 5 reported post-CP hydrocephalus, 10 reported intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 8 reported extra-axial fluid collections (EFC). TBI was associated with increased odds of BFR (odds ratio [OR] 1.76, p < 0.01) and infection (OR 1.38, p = 0.02). No difference was detected in the odds of overall complications, seizures, hydrocephalus, ICH, or EFC.Awareness of increased risks of BFR and infection after CP in TBI patients promotes the implementation of new strategies to prevent these complications especially in this category of patients.

AK, Faujdar DS. Bony Union and Flap Resorption in Cranioplasty with Autologous Subcutaneous Pocket Preserved Bone Flap: Early Report on an Ambidirectional CT Scan-Based Study

Introduction Absence of sufficient number of prospective randomized controlled studies and comparatively small sample size and short follow-up period of most of the studies, available so far, have left ambiguity and lack of standardization of different aspects of cranioplasty.

Materials and Methods This is an early report of a computed tomography scan image-based ambidirectional study on cranioplasties performed with autologous subcutaneous pocket preserved bone flaps. Retrospective arm compared bony union and factors influencing it between cranioplasties and craniotomies. Patients with poor bony union and aseptic resorption were followed up in the prospective arm.

Results Retrospective arm of the study, followed up for five years (mean 32.2 months), comprised 42 patients as cases (Group 1) and 29 as controls (Group 2). Twenty-seven individuals (64.3%) in Group 1 had good bony union, as compared with 20 (68.9%) good unions in Group 2 out of the 29 patients. Four patients (9.5%) in Group 1 showed evidence of flap resorption, a finding absent in any patient in Group 2. Age, sex, smoking habits, superficial skin infection, and method of fixation did not appear to have any implication on bony union. Craniotomies done using Gigli saws fared better as compared with those done with pneumatic saw with lesser flap size–craniectomy size discrepancy, though it was not statistically significant. Fifteen patients have been included in the Prospective arm at the time of submission of this article.

Conclusion Ours is a study with a small sample size, unable to put its weight on any side, but can surely add some more data to help the Neurosurgeons in choosing the best for their patients.

Cranioplasty Using Customized 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Implants: An International Collaboration Effort to Improve Neurosurgical Care

BACKGROUND

Evolutions in cranioplasty have allowed for the creation of customized implants via advances in 3-dimensional (3D) printing technology, although the high cost associated with this technique presents a barrier for low-income countries. Through an international collaboration, our team in Da Nang, Vietnam is able to create low-cost, customized titanium implants for patients with skull defects. We discuss the details of our collaboration and present our experience with this procedure.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 35 patients who underwent cranioplasty using custom-made titanium implants. The molding and implant making processes were performed by our neurosurgeons using a 3D printer donated by the United Kingdom-based nongovernmental organization Facing the World. We obtained demographic and preoperative data (reason for skull defect, location, surface area measurement of defect) and postoperative data (complications, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction).

RESULTS

The median patient age was 27 years (range, 16-60 years). Primary indications for craniectomy included traumatic brain injury from motor vehicle accident (77.1%), cerebrovascular disease (11.4%), implant failure following previous cranioplasty (5.7%), and fall (5.7%). Postoperatively, all implants were found to have an excellent fit; at 6-month follow-up, none of the implants required removal. Complications included 4 postoperative hematomas and 1 surgical site infection. All the patients had improved aesthetic appearance and high satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Cranioplasty using customized titanium implants yields excellent results for patients with skull defects, demonstrating the practicality of this technique for cranioplasty in low-income countries. Our experience highlights the importance of ongoing international collaboration to improve neurosurgical care in these countries.

Complications Following Decompressive Craniectomy

BACKGROUND

 Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has become the definitive surgical procedure to manage a medically intractable rise in intracranial pressure. DC is a life-saving procedure resulting in lower mortality but also higher rates of severe disability. Although technically straightforward, DC is accompanied by many complications. It has been reported that complications are associated with worse outcome. We reviewed a series of patients who underwent DC at our department to establish the incidence and types of complications.

METHODS

 We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of complications after DC performed in 135 patients during the time period from January 2013 to December 2018. Postoperative complications were evaluated using clinical status and CT during 6 months of follow-up. In addition, the impact of potential risk factors on the incidence of complications and the impact of complications on outcome were assessed.

RESULTS

 DC was performed in 135 patients, 93 of these for trauma, 22 for subarachnoid hemorrhage, 13 for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction, and 7 for intracerebral hemorrhage. Primary DC was performed in 120 patients and secondary DC in 15 patients. At least 1 complication occurred in each of 100 patients (74%), of which 22 patients (22%) were treated surgically. The following complications were found: edema or hematoma of the temporal muscle (34 times), extracerebral hematoma (33 times), extra-axial fluid collection (31 times), hemorrhagic progression of contusions (19 times), hydrocephalus (12 times), intraoperative malignant brain edema (10 times), temporal muscle atrophy (7 times), significant intraoperative blood loss (6 times), epileptic seizures (5 times), and skin necrosis (4 times). Trauma (p = 0.0006), coagulopathy (p = 0.0099), and primary DC (p = 0.0252) were identified as risk factors for complications. There was no significant impact of complications on outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

 The incidence of complications following DC is high. However, we did not confirm a significant impact of complications on outcome. We emphasize that some phenomena are so frequent that they can be considered a consequence of primary injury or natural sequelae of the DC rather than its direct complication.

The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review

The use of autologous bone flap for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy is a widely used strategy that allows alleviating health expenses. When the patient has recovered from the primary insult, the cranioplasty restores protection and cosmesis, recovering fluid dynamics and improving neurological status. During this time, the bone flap must be stored, but there is a lack of standardization of tissue banking practices for this aim. In this work, we have reviewed the literature on tissue processing and storage practices. Most of the published articles are focused from a strictly clinical and surgical point of view, paying less attention to issues related to tissue manipulation. When bone resorption is avoided and the risk of infection is controlled, the autograft represents the most efficient choice, with the lowest risk of complication. Otherwise, depending on the degree of involvement, the patient may have to undergo new surgery, assuming further risks and higher healthcare costs. Therefore, tissue banks must implement protocols to provide products with the highest possible clinical effectiveness, without compromising safety. With a centralised management of tissue banking practices there may be a more uniform approach, thus facilitating the standardization of procedures and guidelines.

Cranial bone flap resorption-pathological features and their implications for clinical treatment

Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy (DC) has a primary complication when using the autologous bone: aseptic bone resorption (ABR). So far, risk factors such as age, number of fragments, and hydrocephalus have been identified but a thorough understanding of the underlying pathophysiology is still missing. The aim of this osteopathological investigation was to gain a better understanding of the underlying processes. Clinical data of patients who underwent surgical revision due to ABR was collected. Demographics, the time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, and endocrine serum parameters affecting bone metabolism were collected. Removed specimens underwent qualitative and quantitative histological examination. Two grafts without ABR were examined as controls. Compared to the controls, the typical layering of the cortical and cancellous bone was largely eliminated in the grafts. Histological investigations revealed the coexistence of osteolytic and osteoblastic activity within the necrosis. Bone appositions were distributed over the entire graft area. Remaining marrow spaces were predominantly fibrotic or necrotic. In areas with marrow cavity fibrosis, hardly any new bone tissue was found in the adjacent bone, while there were increased signs of osteoclastic resorption. Insufficient reintegration of the flap may be due to residual fatty bone marrow contained in the bone flap which seems to act as a barrier for osteogenesis. This may obstruct the reorganization of the bone structure, inducing aseptic bone necrosis. Following a path already taken in orthopedic surgery, thorough lavage of the implant to remove the bone marrow may be a possibility, but will need further investigation.

An improved process for the fabrication and surface treatment of custom-made titanium cranioplasty implants informed by surface analysis

Cranioplasty implants are routinely fabricated from commercially pure titanium plates by maxillofacial prosthetists. The differing fabrication protocols adopted by prosthetists working at different hospital sites gives rise to considerable variations in surface topography and composition of cranioplasty implants, with residues from the fabrication processes having been found to become incorporated into the surface of the implant. There is a growing recognition among maxillofacial prosthetists of the need to standardise these protocols to ensure quality and consistency of practice within the profession. In an effort to identify and eliminate the source of the inclusions associated with one such fabrication protocol, the present study examined the surfaces of samples subjected to each of the manufacturing steps involved. Surface and elemental analysis techniques identified the main constituent of the surface inclusions to be silicon from the glass beads used to texture the surface of the implant during fabrication. Subsequent analysis of samples prepared according to a revised protocol resulted in a more homogeneous titanium dioxide surface as evidenced by the reduction in area occupied by surface inclusions (from 8.51% ± 2.60% to 0.93% ± 0.62%). These findings may inform the development of improved protocols for the fabrication of titanium cranioplasty plates.

Conditioning of 3D Printed Nanoengineered Ionic-Covalent Entanglement Scaffolds with iP-hMSCs Derived Matrix

Additive manufacturing is a promising method for producing customized 3D bioactive constructs for regenerative medicine. Here, 3D printed highly osteogenic scaffolds using nanoengineered ionic-covalent entanglement ink (NICE) for bone tissue engineering are reported. This NICE ink consists of ionic-covalent entanglement reinforced with Laponite, a 2D nanosilicate (nSi) clay, allowing for the printing of anatomic-sized constructs with high accuracy. The 3D printed structure is able to maintain high structural stability in physiological conditions without any significant swelling or deswelling. The presence of nSi imparts osteoinductive characteristics to the NICE scaffolds, which is further augmented by depositing pluripotent stem cell-derived extracellular matrix (ECM) on the scaffolds. This is achieved by stimulating human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells (iP-hMSCs) with 2-chloro-5-nitrobenzanilide, a PPARγ inhibitor that enhances Wnt pathway, resulting in the deposition of an ECM characterized by high levels of collagens VI and XII found in anabolic bone. The osteoinductive characteristics of these bioconditioned NICE (bNICE) scaffolds is demonstrated through osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow derived human mesenchymal stem cells. A significant increase in the expression of osteogenic gene markers as well as mineralized ECM are observed on bioconditioned NICE (bNICE) scaffolds compared to bare scaffolds (NICE). The bioconditioned 3D printed scaffolds provide a unique strategy to design personalized bone grafts for in situ bone regeneration.

Risk of Complications in Primary Versus Revision-Type Cranioplasty

INTRODUCTION

Cranioplasty (CP) is a multifaceted procedure in a heterogenous patient population, with a high risk for complication. However, no previous large-scale studies have compared outcomes in primary (ie, first attempt) CP versus revision CP (ie, following previous attempts). The authors, therefore, analyzed long-term outcomes of 506 consecutive primary and revision CPs, performed by a single surgeon.

METHODS

All CPs performed between 2012 and 2019 were analyzed under IRB protocol approval. Surgeries were categorized as either primary (no previous CP; n = 279) or revision CP (at least one previous CP; n = 227). Complications were defined as either major or minor. Subgroup analyses investigated whether or not CP complication risk directly correlated with the number of previous neuro-cranial surgeries and/or CP attempts.

RESULTS

The primary CP group experienced a major complication rate of 9% (26/279). In comparison, the revision CP group demonstrated a major complication rate of 32% (73/227). For the revision CP group, the rate of major complications rose with each additional surgery, from 4% (1 prior surgery) to 17% (2 prior surgeries) to 39% (3-4 prior surgeries) to 47% (≥5 prior surgeries).

CONCLUSION

In a review of 506 consecutive cases, patients undergoing revision CP had a 3-fold increase in incidence of major complications, as compared to those undergoing primary CP. These results provide critical insight into overall CP risk stratification and may guide preoperative risk-benefit discussions. Furthermore, these findings may support a center-of-excellence care model, particularly for those patients with a history of previous neuro-cranial surgeries and/or CP attempts.