Approach and management of patients injured by bullfighting trauma

INTRODUCTION

Bullfighting festivals are attributed to the cultural idiosyncrasies of the Ibero-American people, posing an extreme risk to the physical integrity of the participants. Spain is considered the country with the highest number of bull-related celebrations worldwide and, therefore, with the highest number of patients injured by bullfighting trauma treated, thus justifying a public health problem. The generalities associated with this type of trauma define the people injured as polytraumatised patients. In addition, it is important to know the kinematics of the injuries and their specific characteristics, in order to implement quality medical-surgical care.

METHODS

scientific review of the literature to promote a comprehensive guide for the medical-surgical management of patients injured by bullfighting trauma.

RESULTS

We described the guidelines to standardise protocols for in-hospital approach of patients injured by bullfighting trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

Bullfighting trauma is considered a real health problem in the emergency departments of the ibero-Americans countries, especially in Spain, where bullfighting is part of the national culture. The inherent characteristics of these animals cause injuries with special aspects, so it is important to know the generalities of bullfighting trauma. Because of the multidisciplinary approach, this guidelines are adressed to all healthcare providers involved in the management of these patients. It is essential to establish particular initial care for this type of injury, specific therapeutic action and follow-up based on the medical-surgical management of the trauma patient in order to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality.

Eight-year analysis of bullfighting injuries in Spain, Portugal and southern France

Improving knowledge on the epidemiology and analysing the prognostic factors of severity for injuries caused by fighting bulls in Spain, Portugal and southern France. Observational retrospective study including 1239 patients with a reported history of bull horn injuries between January 2012 and November 2019 in Spain, Portugal or southern France. A multiple logistic regression test was used to analyse the prognostic factors of severity and mortality rate of these lesions. The mean accident rate was 9.13% and the mortality rate was 0.48%. The most frequent mechanism of trauma was goring, and the commonest locations of the lesions were thigh and groin. Vascular lesion was found in 20% of thigh/groin gorings. Prognostic factors of severity were vascular lesion, head trauma, fracture, goring injuries and age of the animal. The most reliable prognostic factors of mortality were vascular lesion and goring in the back. Lesions caused by fighting bulls are common in the bullfighting events held in Spain, Portugal and southern France. Although the mortality rate is low, there is a higher morbidity rate, which is conditioned by vascular lesion. All medical teams should include a surgeon experienced in vascular surgery and an anaesthesiologist.

Taurine surgery in the 21st century from glory to contempt

Bullfighting surgery has gone from being something that the surgeon could be proud of in any setting to being an activity frowned upon from a social point of view, and even in our surgical guild. However, popular bullfighting festivities are still very frequent, with thousands of injured each year, some of them serious. Currently, health care in bullfighting festivals is immersed in a complex problem mainly due to four factors: 1) social and professional discredit; 2) poorly paid professional activity; 3) neglect by professional and academic institutions; and 4) lack of a specific body of doctrine. All this has led to the health care teams in bullfighting surgery being less and less professionalized and more inexperienced, to problems of professional intrusion. Consequently, there is a direct impact on the quality of care provided and on the morbidity and mortality rates of injured participants, with the legal implications that this entails. A restructuring of this situation and the support of professional institutions, especially Medical Associations, and academic institutions, is necessary.

Taurine surgery in the 21st century from glory to contempt

Bullfighting surgery has gone from being something that the surgeon presumed in all areas of his environment to being an activity frowned upon from a social point of view and included in our surgical guild. However, popular bullfighting festivities are still very frequent, with thousands of injured each year, some of them serious. Currently, health care in bullfighting festivals is immersed in a complex problem mainly due to four aspects: 1) social and professional discredit, 2) poorly paid professional activity, 3) abandonment by professional and academic institutions, and 4) lack of a specific body of doctrine. All this is leading to the health care teams in bullfighting surgery being less and less professionalized and more inexperienced, to problems of professional intrusion, and consequently is having a direct impact on the quality of care provided and on the morbidity and mortality of the injured population, with the legal implications that it entails. A restructuring of this situation and the support of professional institutions, especially Medical Associations, and academic institutions, is necessary.

Causes and Mechanisms of Death in Fatal Water Buffalo Attacks

Deaths due to buffalo attack have not been well described. A 72-year-old man was trampled by a water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) while attempting to move the animal within an enclosed area at an abattoir. At autopsy, there were numerous injuries involving the chest, head, neck, and left upper arm. Blunt force injury had resulted in multiple rib fractures with a flail chest and fracture/dislocation of the mid-cervical vertebrae caused either by physical crushing by the animal against the walls of the enclosure or by stomping. There was also evidence of crush asphyxia with bilateral conjunctival hemorrhages and petechial hemorrhages. In addition, there was a deep degloving injury of the upper left arm compatible with goring by one of the buffalo horns. While large animal attacks may result in death from multiple injuries, careful dissection and examination of specific injuries at autopsy may clarify the complex interaction of lethal mechanisms.

Bullhorn and bullfighting injuries

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to present our hospital experience with bullhorn injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients in our Trauma Registry (1993-2012).

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were included. All were hemodynamically stable on presentation, with a mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and a Revised Trauma Score (RTS) of 15 and 11.9, respectively. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score were 13.6 ± 6 and 15.9 ± 9, respectively. Seven had an ISS > 15. Injuries resulted from an isolated blunt trauma (BT) in four, penetrating trauma (PT) in seven, with extensive soft tissue injuries (STI) in three, and a combined BT + PT mechanism in four patients, with extensive STI in all. Three patients had injuries to vessels in the groin, two with prehospital vein ligation. Five patients had abdominal visceral injuries, and another had a sheathed goring, with a traumatic abdominal wall hernia and retroperitoneal hematoma. Four patients had thoracic injuries, and one of them had a traumatic thoracoplasty with a large open thoracic wound, a flail chest, and extensive STI. Two patients had traumatic brain injury, and six had bone fractures. Two-thirds of patients required a surgical procedure under general anesthesia. Morbidity included three surgical site infections, one leg compartment syndrome, and one persistent lymph drainage. There was no mortality, and the mean length of hospital stay was 16 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Bullhorn and bullfighting injuries frequently have a multimechanistic origin which goes beyond a pure penetrating trauma. Associated blunt and STI were common in our series, and the overall prognosis of patients admitted to hospital was good.