En bloc resection of sacral chordomas aided by frameless stereotactic image guidance: a technical note

A case-control study of computer navigation assisted resection of primary sacral chordoma above sacrum 3 level

•

This is a retrospective case-control study.

•

The computer navigation aided technology can make more cases achieve safe surgical margin.

•

The clear bone resection margins were achieved in all cases in navigation group.

•

The application of computer navigation doesn’t increase the operation time and intraoperative blood loss.

Background

The operation of sacral chordoma resection is difficult especial in the tumor above sacrum 3 level and the local recurrence rate was high. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of computer navigation aided technology in primary sacral chordoma resection above sacrum 3 level through a case-control study, which including perioperative safety, surgical margin, postoperative recurrence and function results.

Methods

This is a retrospective case-control study. The clinical data of 25 patients received initial computer-assisted resection of sacral chordoma above the level of sacrum 3 from 2009 to 2016 were analyzed; the patients underwent non-navigation assisted resection of tumor above the level of sacrum 3 in the same period were matched and 25 patients were selected randomly. There was no significant difference between these two groups in gender (P = 0.370), age (P = 0.554), tumor transverse diameter (P = 0.836). The average maximum diameter of tumor in navigation group was significant bigger than that in non-navigation group (P = 0.005). The intraoperative safety results, surgical margin, postoperative complications, recurrence rate and function were compared between these groups.

Results

There was no significant difference between navigation and non-navigation group in operative time (P = 0.105) and intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.537). There were 18 wide resections, 4 marginal resections and 3 intracapsular resections in navigation group; there were 6 wide resections, 12 marginal resections and 7 intracapsular resections in non-navigation group; the surgical margins of two groups were significant different (P = 0.003). There were 5 cases (20%) and 6 cases (24%) with wound complication in navigation group and non-navigation group (P = 0.733). The average follow-up was 49.6 (16–102) months in navigation group and 51.3 (12–110) months in non-navigation group. Three cases (12%) showed recurrence in navigation group and six cases showed recurrence (24%) in non-navigation group. The surgical margin was significantly related with tumor recurrence (P = 0.000). The average MSTS score was 27.3 (19–30) and 26.5 (20–29) in navigation group and non-navigation group (P = 0.374).

Conclusion

The computer navigation aided technology can improve the accuracy of primary sacral chordoma resection, and make more cases achieve safe surgical margin. Compared with the traditional operation, the application of computer navigation in the larger tumor resection does not increase the operation time and intraoperative blood loss, which shows good safety.

Image guidance in spine tumor surgery

Beginning with basic stereotactic operative methods in neurosurgery, intraoperative navigation and image guidance systems have since become the norm in that field. Following the introduction of image guidance into spinal surgery, there has been a dramatic increase in its utilization across disciplines and pathologies. Spine tumor surgery encompasses a wide range of complex surgical techniques and treatment strategies. Similarly to deformity correction and trauma surgery, spine navigation holds potential to improve outcomes and optimize surgical technique for spinal tumors. Recent data demonstrate the applicability of neuro-navigation in the field of spinal oncology, particularly for spinal stabilization, maximizing extent of resection and integration of minimally invasive therapies. The rapid introduction of new, less invasive, and ablative surgical techniques in spine oncology coupled with the rising incidence of spinal metastatic disease make it imperative for spine surgeons to be familiar with the indications for and limitations of imaging guidance. Herein, we provide a practical, current concepts narrative review on the use of spinal navigation in three areas of spinal oncology: (a) extent of tumor resection, (b) spinal column stabilization, and (c) focal ablation techniques.

Use of image-guided bone scalpel for resection of spine tumors: technical note

In the literature, the use of navigation for spine tumor surgery has largely centered on implant placement. We describe the cases of two patients with spinal tumors on whom we utilized our resection technique of registering an ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) to a navigation system. In both cases, we achieved a satisfactory tumor resection with negative margins and excellent neurologic outcomes. We feel that using the navigation-registered UBS is a valuable tool to increase the operator's ability to achieve desired resections while minimizing the neurologic deficits and operative morbidity associated with these challenging surgical cases.

Computer Navigation-aided Resection of Sacral Chordomas

BACKGROUND

Resection of sacral chordomas is challenging. The anatomy is complex, and there are often no bony landmarks to guide the resection. Achieving adequate surgical margins is, therefore, difficult, and the recurrence rate is high. Use of computer navigation may allow optimal preoperative planning and improve precision in tumor resection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of computer navigation-aided resection of sacral chordomas.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2013, a total of 26 patients with sacral chordoma underwent computer navigation-aided surgery were included and followed for a minimum of 18 months. There were 21 primary cases and 5 recurrent cases, with a mean age of 55.8 years old (range: 35-84 years old). Tumors were located above the level of the S3 neural foramen in 23 patients and below the level of the S3 neural foramen in 3 patients. Three-dimensional images were reconstructed with a computed tomography-based navigation system combined with the magnetic resonance images using the navigation software. Tumors were resected via a posterior approach assisted by the computer navigation. Mean follow-up was 38.6 months (range: 18-84 months).

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 307 min. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 3065 ml. For computer navigation, the mean registration deviation during surgery was 1.7 mm. There were 18 wide resections, 4 marginal resections, and 4 intralesional resections. All patients were alive at the final follow-up, with 2 (7.7%) exhibiting tumor recurrence. The other 24 patients were tumor-free. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score was 27.3 (range: 19-30).

CONCLUSIONS

Computer-assisted navigation can be safely applied to the resection of the sacral chordomas, allowing execution of preoperative plans, and achieving good oncological outcomes. Nevertheless, this needs to be accomplished by surgeons with adequate experience and skill.

Computer-Assisted Navigation During an Anterior-Posterior En Bloc Resection of a Sacral Tumor

Previously, a computer-based navigation system has not been used routinely for en-bloc resection of sacral tumors. In order to improve the accuracy of tumor resection, O-arm navigation was used to join anterior and posterior osteotomies during an en-bloc resection of a sacral Ewing’s sarcoma.

This case study describes the technique for en-bloc resection of a sacral Ewing’s sarcoma guided by O-arm computer navigation and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM).

An 18-year-old male presented with weakness in his left lower extremity. MRI of the patient's spine showed a sacral mass causing compression of left S1 and S2 roots. A surgical resection was planned with anterior and posterior approaches. An O-arm computer navigation system was used to assist in meeting anterior osteotomy cuts with the posterior cuts to ensure complete resection of the sacral tumor with a safe margin.

Computer-assisted navigation was used along with IONM during this procedure to help guide the surgical team in an adequate tumor resection. There were no complications related to the use of the O-arm or the navigation system.

Computer navigation guidance is both useful and safe in sacral tumor resections. It enhanced the accuracy of the en-bloc removal of a sacral tumor with safe margins while protecting neural function and minimizing recurrence.