Immediate titanium cranioplasty after debridement and craniectomy for postcraniotomy surgical site infection

Bone flap management strategies for postcraniotomy surgical site infection

Background:

Surgical site infection (SSI) after a craniotomy is traditionally treated with wound debridement and disposal of the bone flap, followed by intravenous antibiotics. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety of replacing the bone flap or performing immediate titanium cranioplasty.

Methods:

All craniotomies at single center between 2008 and 2020 were examined to identify 35 patients with postoperative SSI. Patients were grouped by bone flap management: craniectomy (22 patients), bone flap replacement (seven patients), and titanium cranioplasty (six patients). Retrospective chart review was performed to identify patient age, gender, index surgery indication and duration, diffusion restriction on MRI, presence of gross purulence, bacteria cultured, sinus involvement, implants used during surgery, and antibiotic prophylaxis/ treatment. These variables were compared to future infection recurrence and wound breakdown.

Results:

There was no significant difference in infection recurrence or future wound breakdown among the three bone flap management groups (P = 0.21, P = 0.25). None of the variables investigated had any significant relation to infection recurrence when all patients were included in the analysis. However, when only the bone flap replacement group was analyzed, there was significantly higher infection recurrence when there was frank purulence present (P = 0.048).

Conclusion:

Replacing the bone flap or performing an immediate titanium cranioplasty is safe alternatives to discarding the bone flap after postoperative craniotomy SSI. When there is gross purulence present, caution should be used in replacing the bone flap, as infection recurrence is significantly higher in this subgroup of patients.

Comparison of two different titanium cranioplasty methods: Custom-made titanium prostheses versus precurved titanium mesh

Background:

The aim of this study was to compare the results of two different titanium cranioplasties for reconstructing skull defects: standard precurved mesh versus custom-made prostheses.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of 23 patients submitted to titanium cranioplasty between January 2014 and January 2019. Ten patients underwent delayed cranioplasty using custom-made prostheses; and 13 patients were treated using precurved titanium mesh (ten delayed cranioplasties, and three single-stage resection- reconstructions). Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were recorded. Results and complications of the two methods were compared, including duration of surgery, cosmetic results (visual analog scale for cosmesis [VASC]), and costs of the implants.

Results:

Complications: one epidural hematoma in the custom-made group, one delayed failure in precurved group due to wound dehiscence with mesh exposure. There were no infections in either group. All custom-made prostheses perfectly fitted on the defect; eight of 13 precurved mesh prostheses incompletely covered the defect. Custom-made cranioplasty obtained better cosmetic results (average VASC 94 vs. 68), shorter surgical time (141min vs. 186min), and -fewer screws was needed to fix the prostheses in place (6 vs. 15). However, satisfactory results were obtained using precurved mesh in cases of small defects and in single-stage reconstruction. Precurved mesh was found to be cheaper (€1,500 vs. €5,500).

Conclusion:

Custom-made cranioplasty obtained better results and we would suggest that this should be a first choice, particularly for young patients with a large cranial defect. Precurved mesh was cheaper and useful for single-stage resection-reconstruction. Depending on the individual conditions, both prostheses have their place in cranioplasty therapies.

Cranial Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh for Open Depressed Skull Fracture in Children: Reports of Two Cases with Long-term Observation

In the treatment of open depressed skull fracture in pediatric cases, it is preferable to use the patient's own bone material rather than artificial material. However, there are occasions when self-material reconstruction may be impossible. In such cases the safe option is to leave the defect until future replacement of the skull becomes possible, however this often causes such children to experience severe limitations to school life. We present two thought-provoking cases in which we solved such issues by early stage cranioplasty using a titanium mesh. The first case involved a 9-year-old boy who sustained a depressed fracture in the right temporal region after falling down a riverbank. Although he underwent surgical repair, bacterial infection forced removal of the bone flap postoperatively. His school life was severely restricted and sports activities were prohibited due to the residual regional bone defect. Cranial reconstruction with a titanium mesh made it possible for him to enjoy a more active lifestyle. The second case involved a 7-year-old boy who sustained a right frontal depressed fracture in a traffic accident. The fractured skull was promptly replaced by a titanium mesh at the initial surgery due to the extreme degree of bone fragmentation. Both boys returned to school life enjoying normal activities and without any complications for up to 8 years now. The cases presented here indicate that early cranioplasty even using artificial material is not only safe but enables school age patients to participate in physical activities. From the standpoint of physical and psychological development, early stage cranioplasty with titanium mesh may be a valuable treatment option for pediatric open depressed skull fracture.

Timing of cranial reconstruction after cranioplasty infections: are we ready for a re-thinking? A comparative analysis of delayed versus immediate cranioplasty after debridement in a series of 48 patients

The optimal management of cranioplasty infections remains a matter of debate. Most authors have suggested that the infected bone/implant removal is mandatory, combined with prolonged antibiotic therapy before reconstruction. However, failures can occur, even with 12-18-month intervals between the surgeries. Longer wait times before cranial reconstruction increase the risks of socioeconomic burdens and further complications, as observed in decompressed patients hosting shunts. In our department, we treated 48 cranioplasty infections over a period of 8 years, divided into two groups. For Group A (n = 26), the treatment consisted of cranioplasty removal and debridement, followed by a delayed reconstruction. Group B (n = 22) received 2 weeks of broad-spectrum antibiotics, followed by an "aggressive" field debridement and immediate cranioplasty. All patients received a minimum of 8 weeks of post-operative antibiotic therapy and were scheduled for clinic-radiological follow-ups for at least 36 months. Significant differences were observed between Groups A and B with respect to the number of failures (respectively 7 versus 1), the global operative time (significantly longer for Group B), germ identification (respectively 7 versus 13), and the overall length of hospital stay (on average, 61.04 days in Group A versus 47.41 days in Group B). Three shunted patients in Group A developed sinking flap syndrome. Shunt resetting allowed symptom control until cranioplasty in one subject, whereas two did not improve, even after reconstruction. In selected patients, an aggressive field debridement, followed by the immediate replacement of an infected cranioplasty, may represent a safe and valuable option.

Single procedure revision cranioplasty with intra-operative autoclave following titanium plate exposure

Background: Patients with titanium cranioplasties can develop skin defects and plate exposure requiring revision surgery to prevent infection. The management of these patients has historically been staged surgery to remove the exposed plate followed by re-implantation of a sterile plate at a later date.Objectives: We describe an alternative where the exposed plate is removed, sterilised by autoclaving and re-implanted, in one operation.Methods: Patients with exposed titanium cranioplasties who underwent single-stage revisions were identified over a 30-month period. All patients received antibiotics post-procedure and were followed up.Results: Between June 2015 and December 2017 four patients had five single-stage revision cranioplasties with intraoperative autoclave sterilisation (SSRC). The mean time from initial procedure to revision was 5.6years. The mean time from plate exposure to surgery was 7 days. Plate exposure recurred in 60% (3/5) of cases post-SSRC. Two of these had the plate removed. The other had a second SSRC. On average recurrent plate exposure developed 17 months after SSRC. The 2 cases who had the plate removed remained complication-free to last follow up at 25 and 52 months after SSRC.Conclusions: Single procedure revision cranioplasty with intra-operative autoclave following titanium plate exposure may be considered as an option in patients with plate exposure who do not have other evidence on infection but we found recurrent plate exposure occurred in 50%.

Immediate Cranioplasty for Postcranioplasty Infection in Patients with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt

BACKGROUND

Patients with a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt tend to develop epidural fluid accumulation after cranioplasty and also have a higher frequency of syndrome of the trephined after bone flap removal. Thus treatment of patients with postcranioplasty infection and a VP shunt is often challenging.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We treated 2 patients with postcranioplasty infection and a VP shunt. One patient had undergone decompressive craniectomy for cerebral hemorrhage, and the other patient had a large frontal dead space following resection of a brain tumor. Both patients were treated by immediate cranioplasty with obliteration of the epidural dead space by using a vascularized free latissimus dorsi muscle flap. In both of them, the postoperative course was uneventful without any complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate cranioplasty and obliteration of the epidural dead space with a vascularized free latissimus dorsi muscle flap is an alternative for patients with postcranioplasty infection who are unfavorable candidates for temporary bone flap removal because of the risk of neurologic deterioration.

Bone flap salvage in acute surgical site infection after craniotomy for tumor resection

Craniotomy surgical site infections are an inherent risk and dreaded complication for the elective brain tumor patient. Sequelae can include delays in resumption in adjuvant treatments for multiple surgeries if staged cranioplasty is pursued. Here, the authors review their experience in operative debridement of surgical site infections with single-stage reimplantation of the salvaged craniotomy bone flap. A prospectively maintained database of a single surgeon's neuro-oncology patients from 2009 to 2017 (JRF) was queried to identify 11 patients with surgical site infection after craniotomy for tumor resection. All patients underwent a protocol of aggressive operative debridement including drilling the bone edges and intraoperative flap sterilization with single-stage reimplantation, followed by tailored-antibiotic therapy. Ten of the 11 patients with frankly contaminated bone flaps from surgical site infection were able to be salvaged in a single-stage procedure. Five of these patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation without secondary complication. There was one treatment failure in a delayed fashion which required additional surgery for craniectomy; however, this occurred after adjuvant treatment was administered. Surgical debridement and bone flap salvage is safe and cost-effective in managing acute surgical site infections after craniotomy for tumors. Additionally, this practice is likely beneficial in expediting the resumption of cancer therapy.

Bioinspired Collagen Scaffolds in Cranial Bone Regeneration: From Bedside to Bench

Calvarial defects are common reconstructive dilemmas secondary to a variety of etiologies including traumatic brain injury, cerebrovascular disease, oncologic resection, and congenital anomalies. Reconstruction of the calvarium is generally undertaken for the purposes of cerebral protection, contour restoration for psychosocial well-being, and normalization of neurological dysfunction frequently found in patients with massive cranial defects. Current methods for reconstruction using autologous grafts, allogeneic grafts, or alloplastic materials have significant drawbacks that are unique to each material. The combination of wide medical relevance and the need for a better clinical solution render defects of the cranial skeleton an ideal target for development of regenerative strategies focused on calvarial bone. With the improved understanding of the instructive properties of tissue-specific extracellular matrices and the advent of precise nanoscale modulation in materials science, strategies in regenerative medicine have shifted in paradigm. Previously considered to be simple carriers of stem cells and growth factors, increasing evidence exists for differential materials directing lineage specific differentiation of progenitor cells and tissue regeneration. In this work, we review the clinical challenges for calvarial reconstruction, the anatomy and physiology of bone, and extracellular matrix-inspired, collagen-based materials that have been tested for in vivo cranial defect healing.

Delayed Brain Edema and Swelling following Craniectomy for Evacuation of an Epidural Abscess that Improved by Cranioplasty: Case Report

We report a unique case of delayed brain swelling following craniectomy that improved rapidly after cranioplasty, and discuss the potential mechanism underlying this delayed and reversible brain swelling. A 22-year-old woman developed surgical site infection after removal of a convexity meningioma. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an epidural abscess around the surgical site. Subsequently, the abscess was evacuated, and the bone flap was removed. Later, brain edema around the skull defect emerged and progressed gradually, despite resolution of the infection. The edematous brain developed focal swelling outward through the bone defect without ventricle dilatation. Because we suspected that the edema and swelling were caused by the state of the bone defect, we performed a cranioplasty 10 weeks after the bone flap removal, and brain edema improved rapidly. We hypothesized that the brain edema was initially caused by surgical stress and inflammation, followed by compression of cortical veins between the dural edge and brain tissue, leading to disruption of venous return and exacerbation of brain edema. When delayed focal brain edema and external swelling progress gradually after bone flap removal, after excluding other pathological conditions, cranioplasty should be considered to improve cortical venous congestion caused by postsurgical adhesion.

Versatility of the Latissimus Dorsi Free Flap during the Treatment of Complex Postcraniotomy Surgical Site Infections

Background:

Some intractable cases of postcraniotomy infection, which can involve compromised skin, an open frontal air sinus, and residual epidural dead space, have been reported. In such cases, reconstructing the scalp and skull is challenging.

Methods:

Between 2009 and 2016, the author treated 12 patients with recalcitrant postcraniotomy surgical site infections with latissimus dorsi (LD) free flaps. The patients’ ages ranged from 37 to 79 years (mean, 63.5 years), and their underlying diseases included subarachnoid hemorrhaging (n = 5), brain tumors (n = 4), and cerebral arteriovenous malformations (n = 3).

Results:

The LD free flap was used for scalp reconstruction in 3 cases, scalp reconstruction and separation of the intracranial and nasal cavities in 5 cases, and the obliteration of epidural dead space in 4 cases. Debridement followed by staged cranial reconstruction was carried out in 8 cases, and single-stage cranial reconstruction was conducted in 2 cases. The bone defects of the other 2 cases, which were small, were filled with LD musculo-adipose free flaps. The postoperative local appearance of the wounds was acceptable in every case, and no complications occurred.

Conclusions:

The LD free flap is a versatile tool for the treatment of complex postcraniotomy surgical site infections. This vascularized muscle flap is useful for controlling local infections because of its abundant vascularity. Moreover, its variety of uses means that it can resolve several problems in cases involving complex cranial wounds.