[Trigeminal neuromas: modern diagnosis and treatment]

Trigeminal neuroma (TN) is a benign neoplasm arising from trigeminal nerve sheath. The tumor can grow from any part of the nerve from the root in posterior cranial fossa to peripheral extracranial branches. Symptoms of trigeminal neuroma are variable and usually depend on location and dimensions of tumor. We present a review devoted to the problem of TN. Surgery was the only possible option in patients with TN for a long time. However, radiotherapy became one of the options and sometimes alternative to surgical treatment since the late 1980s. Besides active management of patients with TN, follow-up with regular radiographic control of small asymptomatic tumors also seems to be reasonable. When evaluating treatment outcomes, physicians consider quality of life and return to previous work and activity in addition to resection quality, neurological impairment, relapse-free period and tumor growth control. However, assessment of these indicators after certain treatment is rare. Thus, it is difficult to determine treatment strategy with maximum ratio of effectiveness and quality of life. Therefore, optimization of TN treatment is currently an urgent problem that requires further study.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal schwannomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been deemed as the gold standard stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) mode for the treatment of intracranial tumors, cerebrovascular diseases and brain functional diseases. Our study was aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy, safety, and complications of gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal schwannomas.

METHOD

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the clinical outcomes of patients with trigeminal schwannomas treated primarily or adjunctly with GKRS. We searched two databases, Pubmed and Embase, for studies published before January 1, 2021, using GKRS for trigeminal schwannomas. Studies reporting treatment of other schwannomas, or other forms of SRS such as linear accelerator and Cyberknife were excluded to reduce its heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Our search achieved 351 studies, of which 35 were assessed for full-text eligibility. 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. 456 of 504 patients (0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.96, I² = 3.02%, p < 0.01) from 18 studies had local control, and 278 of 489 patients (0.63, 95%CI 0.48-0.78, I² = 88.75%, p < 0.01) from 16 studies experienced tumor regression or disappearance. 231 of 499 patients (0.50, 95% CI 0.37-0.62; I² = 83.89%, P < 0.01) from 17 studies had clinical symptoms improved. There was no significant difference in tumor control between those treated with GKRS as either primary treatment or adjuvant to surgery(p = 0.390).

CONCLUSION

GKRS is an efficacious primary and adjuvant method of treating trigeminal schwannomas, with reliable tumor control rates. Randomized controlled trials are needed to further and comprehensively evaluate the benefit-to-risk ratio of gamma knife radiosurgery.

Surgical Management of Jugular Foramen Schwannomas

Simple Summary

Treatments of jugular foramen schwannomas may be challenging due to critical anatomical relations and the involvement of different aspects of the skull base. Advances in microsurgery have led to improved outcomes over recent decades, whereas in contrast, some advocate stereotactic radiotherapy as an effective therapy, controlling the tumor volume with few complications. In this manuscript, we present the outcomes and adverse events in a contemporary cohort and discuss surgical advantages and disadvantages of different performed classic skull base approaches.

Abstract

Background: Resection of jugular foramen schwannomas (JFSs) with minimal cranial nerve (CN) injury remains difficult. Reoperations in this vital region are associated with severe CN deficits. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis at a tertiary neurosurgical center of patients who underwent surgery for JFSs between June 2007 and May 2020. We included nine patients (median age 60 years, 77.8% female, 22.2% male). Preoperative symptoms included hearing loss (66.6%), headache (44.4%), hoarseness (33.3%), dysphagia (44.4%), hypoglossal nerve palsy (22.2%), facial nerve palsy (33.3%), extinguished gag reflex (22.2%), and cerebellar dysfunction (44.4%). We observed Type A, B, C, and D tumors in 3, 1, 1, and 4 patients, respectively. A total of 77.8% (7/9) underwent a retrosigmoid approach, and 33.3% (3/9) underwent an extreme lateral infrajugular transcondylar (ELITE) approach. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in all cases. The rate of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus was 22.2% (2/9). No further complications requiring surgical intervention occurred during follow-up. The median follow-up time was 16.5 months (range 3–84 months). Conclusions: Considering the satisfying outcome, the GTR of JFSs is feasible in performing well-known skull base approaches. Additional invasive and complicated approaches were not needed. Radiosurgery may be an effective alternative for selected patients.

Surgical Outcome of Trigeminal Schwannomas

Simple Summary

Trigeminal schwannomas are the most common among non-vestibular schwannomas. Treatment of trigeminal schwannomas may be challenging due to critical anatomical relations and involvement of different aspects of the skull base. Advances in microsurgery have led to improved outcomes over the last decades, whereas in contrast, some advocate stereotactic radiotherapy as an effective therapy, controlling the tumor volume with few complications. In this manuscript, we present outcome and adverse events in a contemporary cohort of trigeminal schwannomas and discuss surgical advantages and disadvantages of different performed classic skull-base approaches.

Abstract

(1) Background: As resection of trigeminal schwannomas is challenging, due to anatomical involvement of the anterior, middle and posterior fossa, the appropriate approach is important. We report our experience with surgical resection of trigeminal schwannomas by simple and classic skull-base approaches. (2) Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center study including patients who underwent surgery for trigeminal schwannoma tumors between June 2007 and May 2020, concentrating on surgical technique, extent of resection, postoperative outcome and complications. (3) Results: We included 13 patients (median age 57.5 with range of 36-83 years, 53.8% (7/13) female. The most common preoperative clinical presentations were facial pain in six (46.2%), hypoacusis in four (30.8%), trigeminal nerve hypesthesia in 11 (V1 46.2% (6/13), V2 (61.5% (8/13), V3 46.2% (6/13)) and headache in three (23.1%) patients. In three cases, the tumor was resected in a two-stage technique. The intradural subtemporal approach was performed in six cases, the extradural technique in two cases, the retrosigmoid approach in five cases, a Kawase approach in two cases and the transnasal endoscopic approach in one case. The gross total resection rate was 76.9% (10/13) and the median follow-up time 24.0 (0–136) months. Three (23.1%) patients developed postoperative anesthesia in at least one branch of the trigeminal nerve. Trigeminal motor function was preserved in 11 (84.6%) patients. Ten of the 11 patients (76.9%) who reported decreased gustation, cerebellar ataxia, visual impairment, or headache improved postoperatively. Two (15.4%) patients exhibited minimal facial palsy (House and Brackmann II–III), which resolved during the follow-up. The total adverse event rate requiring surgical intervention during follow-up was 7.7%. Surgery-related mortality was 0%. (4) Conclusions: Trigeminal schwannomas are rare benign lesions with intra- and extracranial extension. Considering the low operative morbidity and satisfying functional outcome, gross total resection of trigeminal schwannomas is achievable by classic, but also individually tailored approaches. More invasive or combined techniques were not needed with meticulous surgical planning.

Tumor control and trigeminal dysfunction improvement after stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Trigeminal nerve schwannomas (TS) are uncommon intracranial tumors, frequently presenting with debilitating trigeminal and/or oculomotor nerve dysfunction. While surgical resection has been described, its morbidity and mortality rates are non-negligible. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged with variable results as a valuable alternative. Here, we aimed at reviewing the medical literature on TS treated with SRS so as to investigate rates of tumor control and symptomatic improvement. We reviewed manuscripts published between January 1990 and December 2019 on PubMed. Tumor control and symptomatic improvement rates were evaluated with separate meta-analyses. This meta-analysis included 18 studies comprising a total of 564 patients. Among them, only one reported the outcomes of linear accelerators (Linac), while the others of GK. Tumor control rates after SRS were 92.3% (range 90.1–94.5; p < 0.001), and tumor decrease rates were 62.7% (range 54.3–71, p < 0.001). Tumor progression rates were 9.4% (range 6.8–11.9, p < 0.001). Clinical improvement rates of trigeminal neuralgia were 63.5% (52.9–74.1, p < 0.001) and of oculomotor nerves were 48.2% (range 36–60.5, p < 0.001). Clinical worsening rate was 10.7% (range 7.6–13.8, p < 0.001). Stereotactic radiosurgery for TS is associated with high tumor control rates and favorable clinical outcomes, especially for trigeminal neuralgia and oculomotor nerves. However, patients should be correctly advised about the risk of tumor progression and potential clinical worsening. Future clinical studies should focus on standard reporting of clinical outcomes.

Trigeminal schwannoma: a single-center experience with 43 cases and review of literature

OBJECTIVE

Trigeminal schwannomas (TS) are rare, when compared to vestibular schwannomas. The present study aims to analyze the clinical characteristics and surgical strategies of TS via the retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 43 patients.

METHODS

The clinical information of 43 patients diagnosed with TS, who were surgically treated from January 2008 to January 2018, was retrospectively analyzed. Then, the selection of approaches and surgical strategies were discussed.

RESULTS

During the last 10 years, 43 patients with TS received surgical treatment at Xuan Wu Hospital of Capital Medical University. Facial numbness and hypoesthesia were the most common symptoms, which developed in 29 cases (67.4%). Typical trigeminal neuralgia was complained by four patients (9.3%), while trigeminal motor impairment developed in nine cases (20.9%). The tumor was totally removed in 39 patients (90.7%), near-totally removed in three patients (7.0%), and partially removed in one patient (2.3%) due to intraoperative internal carotid artery (ICA) injury. The abducens was intraoperatively damaged in two patients (4.7%). After the operation, all four patients with trigeminal neuralgia achieved total recovery, but the facial numbness still continued in 24 patients (82.8%). At a median of 45.3 ± 25.5 (6-84) months of follow up, a tumor recurred in only one patient, and this patient received a second operation.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that total removal via the proper approach can be the best treatment for TS with a low complication rate. However, preoperative symptoms, such as facial numbness and trigeminal motor impairment that seldom improved though normal fibers, were carefully recognized and preserved during the operation.

Trigeminal Schwannomas in Middle Fossa Could Breach into Subdural Space: Report of 4 Cases and Review of Literature

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to report 4 cases diagnosed with trigeminal schwannomas (TS), among whom tumor in epidural space of middle fossa broke through dura mater into subdural space, and to analyze the potential reason for recurrence of TS in middle fossa after surgical removal by endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) or interdural approach.

METHODS

The information of 4 patients diagnosed with TS who were surgically treated was retrospectively analyzed and the selection of approaches, surgical strategies, and potential reason for recurrence after middle fossa TS removal by EEA and interdural approach were discussed.

RESULTS

During last 10 years, 43 patients with TS received surgical treatment at Xuan Wu Hospital of Capital Medical University, among whom 1 patient with TS extending from middle fossa to infratemporal fossa was first treated by EEA, then the tumor recurred and the patient underwent a second operation via a frontotemporal subdural approach. During the second operation, we found part of tumor had broken through the dura mater into subdural space. Moreover, this phenomenon was detected in another 3 patients with middle-posterior fossa TS.

CONCLUSIONS

TS in middle fossa has been widely believed to be totally located at epidural space, whereas we found that it could occasionally breach into subdural space and accept blood supply from the pial artery. We believe this could be the potential reason for recurrence after tumor resection by EEA and interdural approach.

Microsurgical Management of Trigeminal Schwannoma: Cohort Analysis and Systematic Review

Background  Trigeminal schwannomas are benign tumors with a predilection for women between 40 and 60 years of age and account for less than 0.5% of all intracranial tumors. Clinical presentation depends on size and location, and typical symptoms are ipsilateral hypesthesia, headache, and facial pain. Clinical features and imaging usually make the Diagnosis. Methods  A retrospective cohort analysis of 14 patients treated at our institution between January 1999 and October 2016 was performed, with a critical and systematic review of data from the literature, focusing on articles published over the same period. Results  Fourteen patients were included in our series comprised of mostly women with a mean age of 40 years. Lesion size ranged from 3 to 6.5 cm (mean 4.6 cm). Clinical status of patients was evaluated and also rated based on the Karnofsky Perfomance Scale with values greater than 90% found in all patients pre and postoperatively. Surgery was our treatment of choice, and gross total resection was achieved in 71% of patients. Associated morbidity was high at 57%, predominantly from cranial nerve palsy, and no deaths were encountered. Conclusions  Microsurgery is a suitable treatment for large symptomatic trigeminal schwannomas, achieving good local control rates over the observation period at acceptable morbidity. Therefore, microsurgery appears to a suitable option. During the study period, a significant evolution in the availability of treatment methods occurred. Radiosurgery emerged as an alternative treatment for unresectable lesions. A comprehensive review of the available literature was performed, and results were compared according to treatment modality.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for non-vestibular cranial nerve schwanommas

Non-vestibular cranial nerve schwannomas (NVCNS) are rare lesions, representing <10 % of cranial nerve schwannomas. The optimal treatment for NVCNS is often derived from vestibular schwannomas experience. Surgical resection has been referred to as the first line treatment for those benign tumors, but significant complication rates are reported. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has arisen as a mainstay of treatment for many benign tumors, including schwanommas. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of NVCNS treated by SRS to characterize tumor control, symptom relief, toxicity, and the role of hypo-fractionation of SRS dose. Eighty-eight (88) patients, with ninety-five (95) NVCNS were treated with either single or multi-session SRS from 2001 to 2014. Local control was achieved in 94 % of patients treated (median follow-up of 33 months, range 1-155). Complications were seen in 7.4 % of cases treated with SRS. At 1-year, 57 % of patients had improvement or resolution of their symptoms, while 35 % were stable and 8 % had worsening or increased symptoms. While 42 % received only one session, results on local control were similar for one or multiple sessions (p = 0.424). SRS for NVCNS is a treatment modality that provides excellent local control with minimal complication risk compared to traditional neurosurgical techniques. Tumor control obtained with a multi-session treatment was not significantly different from single session treatment. Safety profile was also comparable for uni or multi-session treatments. We concluded that, as seen in VS treated with CK SRS, radiosurgery treatment can be safely delivered in cases of NVCNS.

Operative management of trigeminal neuromas: an analysis of a surgical experience with 55 cases

BACKGROUND

The trigeminal schwannoma is the second most common intracranial schwannoma. Their proximity to the critical skull base neural and vascular structures increases the complexity of surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to better understand the surgical approaches and the prognosis, as well as to assess the optimum therapeutic schedule.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 55 patients with trigeminal schwannomas who visited our department between Jan 2007 and Jan 2012. We analyzed the clinical and radiological presentation, tumor characteristics, surgical approaches, the prognosis.

RESULTS

The patients were 30 women and 25 men of mean age 36 years (range, 6-66 years) who received postoperative neurological and neuroradiological follow-up. The tumor was located in the middle fossa (type A) in 13 cases, in the posterior fossa (type B) in ten cases, in the middle and posterior fossae (type C) in 21 cases, and in the branches of the trigeminal nerve (type D) in 11 cases. The most common symptom was facial hypesthesia or numbness in 36 patients (65 %) . Total and nearly total tumor resection was achieved in 51 cases (93 %). Three patients (5 %) had worsening of preexisting deficits and there was no perioperative mortality. With an average follow-up period of 35 months, facial hypesthesia persisted in 26 patients (72 %),and improved in ten patients (28 %). Facial pain was relieved in 11 patients (100 %). There has been a recurrence in one case (2 %) and all patients resumed independent and social reintegration.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates radical surgery with excellent neurological outcomes is the primary treatment of trigeminal schwannomas. Appropriate selection of surgical approach according to tumor types is highly important and necessary. The preoperative facial pain could be relieved, hypesthesia frequently remains or could even be worsened after surgery.