The Gumbel pre-factor k for gapped local alignment can be estimated from simulations of global alignment

The optimal gapped local alignment score of two random sequences follows a Gumbel distribution. The Gumbel distribution has two parameters, the scale parameter λ and the pre-factor k. Presently, the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) programs (BLASTP (BLAST for proteins), PSI-BLAST, etc.) use all time-consuming computer simulations to determine the Gumbel parameters. Because the simulations must be done offline, BLAST users are restricted in their choice of alignment scoring schemes. The ultimate aim of this paper is to speed the simulations, to determine the Gumbel parameters online, and to remove the corresponding restrictions on BLAST users. Simulations for the scale parameter λ can be as much as five times faster, if they use global instead of local alignment [R. Bundschuh (2002) J. Comput. Biol., 9, 243–260]. Unfortunately, the acceleration does not extend in determining the Gumbel pre-factor k, because k has no known mathematical relationship to global alignment. This paper relates k to global alignment and exploits the relationship to show that for the BLASTP defaults, 10 000 realizations with sequences of average length 140 suffice to estimate both Gumbel parameters λ and k within the errors required (λ, 0.8%; k, 10%). For the BLASTP defaults, simulations for both Gumbel parameters now take less than 30 s on a 2.8 GHz Pentium 4 processor.

Rapid significance estimation in local sequence alignment with gaps

In order to assess the significance of sequence alignments, it is crucial to know the distribution of alignment scores of pairs of random sequences. For gapped local alignment, it is empirically known that the shape of this distribution is of the Gumbel form. However, the determination of the parameters of this distribution is a computationally very expensive task. We present a new algorithmic approach which allows estimation of the more important of the Gumbel parameters at least five times faster than the traditional methods. Actual runtimes of our algorithm between less than a second and a few minutes on a workstation bring significance estimation into the realm of interactive applications.