Timing and context of dolphin clicks during and after mine simulator detection and marking in the open ocean

Sights and sounds dolphins, Tursiops truncatus preying on native fish of San Diego Bay and offshore in the Pacific Ocean

For the first time, dolphins wearing video cameras were observed capturing and eating live native fish. While freely swimming in San Diego Bay, one dolphin caught 69 resident fish, 64 demersal, 5 near surface, while the other caught 40, 36 demersal and 4 near the surface. Two other dolphins were observed capturing 135 live native fish in a sea water pool. Two additional dolphins were observed feeding opportunistically during open water sessions in the Pacific Ocean. Notably, one of these dolphins was observed to consume 8 yellow-bellied sea snakes (Hydrophis platurus). Searching dolphins clicked at intervals of 20 to 50 ms. On approaching prey, click intervals shorten into a terminal buzz and then a squeal. Squeals were bursts of clicks that varied in duration, peak frequency, and amplitude. Squeals continued as the dolphin seized, manipulated and swallowed the prey. If fish escaped, the dolphin continued the chase and sonar clicks were heard less often than the continuous terminal buzz and squeal. During captures, the dolphins’ lips flared to reveal nearly all of the teeth. The throat expanded outward. Fish continued escape swimming even as they entered the dolphins’ mouth, yet the dolphin appeared to suck the fish right down.

Detection of simulated patterned echo packets by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

Dolphins performing long-range biosonar tasks sometimes use "packets" of clicks, where inter-click-intervals within each packet are less than the two-way acoustic travel time from dolphin to target. The multi-echo nature of packets results in lower detection thresholds than single echoes; however, other potential benefits of packet use remain unexplored. The present study investigated whether structured temporal patterns observed in click packets impart some advantage in detecting echo-like signals embedded in noise. Two bottlenose dolphins were trained to passively listen and detect simulated packets of echoes in background noise consisting of either steady-state broadband Gaussian noise, or Gaussian noise containing randomly presented impulses similar to dolphin clicks. Four different inter-stimulus-interval (ISI) patterns (constant, random, increasing, or decreasing ISI within each packet) were tested. It was hypothesized that decreasing ISIs-found naturally in dolphin packets-would result in the lowest thresholds, while random, unlearnable patterns would result in the highest. However, no biologically significant differences in threshold were found among the four ISI patterns for either noise condition. Thus, the bottlenose dolphin's stereotypical pattern of decreasing ISI during active echolocation did not appear to provide an advantage in packet detection in this passive listening task.

Dolphin echolocation behaviour during active long-range target approaches

Echolocating toothed whales generally adjust click intensity and rate according to target range to ensure that echoes from targets of interest arrive before a subsequent click is produced, presumably facilitating range estimation from the delay between clicks and returning echoes. However, this click-echo-click paradigm for the dolphin biosonar is mostly based on experiments with stationary animals echolocating fixed targets at ranges below ∼120 m. Therefore, we trained two bottlenose dolphins instrumented with a sound recording tag to approach a target from ranges up to 400 m and either touch the target (subject TRO) or detect a target orientation change (subject SAY). We show that free-swimming dolphins dynamically increase interclick interval (ICI) out to target ranges of ∼100 m. TRO consistently kept ICIs above the two-way travel time (TWTT) for target ranges shorter than ∼100 m, whereas SAY switched between clicking at ICIs above and below the TWTT for target ranges down to ∼25 m. Source levels changed on average by 17log₁₀(target range), but with considerable variation for individual slopes (4.1 standard deviations for by-trial random effects), demonstrating that dolphins do not adopt a fixed automatic gain control matched to target range. At target ranges exceeding ∼100 m, both dolphins frequently switched to click packet production in which interpacket intervals exceeded the TWTT, but ICIs were shorter than the TWTT. We conclude that the click-echo-click paradigm is not a fixed echolocation strategy in dolphins, and we demonstrate the first use of click packets for free-swimming dolphins when solving an echolocation task.