Regulation and function of H3K36 di-methylation by the trithorax-group protein complex AMC

Genomic context-dependent histone H3K36 methylation by three Drosophila methyltransferases and implications for dedicated chromatin readers

Methylation of histone H3 at lysine 36 (H3K36me3) marks active chromatin. The mark is interpreted by epigenetic readers that assist transcription and safeguard the integrity of the chromatin fiber. The chromodomain protein MSL3 binds H3K36me3 to target X-chromosomal genes in male Drosophila for dosage compensation. The PWWP-domain protein JASPer recruits the JIL1 kinase to active chromatin on all chromosomes. Unexpectedly, depletion of K36me3 had variable, locus-specific effects on the interactions of those readers. This observation motivated a systematic and comprehensive study of K36 methylation in a defined cellular model. Contrasting prevailing models, we found that K36me1, K36me2 and K36me3 each contribute to distinct chromatin states. A gene-centric view of the changing K36 methylation landscape upon depletion of the three methyltransferases Set2, NSD and Ash1 revealed local, context-specific methylation signatures. Set2 catalyzes K36me3 predominantly at transcriptionally active euchromatin. NSD places K36me2/3 at defined loci within pericentric heterochromatin and on weakly transcribed euchromatic genes. Ash1 deposits K36me1 at regions with enhancer signatures. The genome-wide mapping of MSL3 and JASPer suggested that they bind K36me2 in addition to K36me3, which was confirmed by direct affinity measurement. This dual specificity attracts the readers to a broader range of chromosomal locations and increases the robustness of their actions.

Structural and functional insights into the epigenetic regulator MRG15

MORF4-related gene on chromosome 15 (MRG15), a chromatin remodeller, is evolutionally conserved and ubiquitously expressed in mammalian tissues and cells. MRG15 plays vital regulatory roles in DNA damage repair, cell proliferation and division, cellular senescence and apoptosis by regulating both gene activation and gene repression via associations with specific histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase complexes. Recently, MRG15 has also been shown to rhythmically regulate hepatic lipid metabolism and suppress carcinoma progression. The unique N-terminal chromodomain and C-terminal MRG domain in MRG15 synergistically regulate its interaction with different cofactors, affecting its functions in various cell types. Thus, how MRG15 elaborately regulates target gene expression and performs diverse functions in different cellular contexts is worth investigating. In this review, we provide an in-depth discussion of how MRG15 controls multiple physiological and pathological processes.

ASH1L-MRG15 methyltransferase deposits H3K4me3 and FACT for damage verification in nucleotide excision repair

To recognize DNA adducts, nucleotide excision repair (NER) deploys the XPC sensor, which detects damage-induced helical distortions, followed by engagement of TFIIH for lesion verification. Accessory players ensure that this factor handover takes place in chromatin where DNA is tightly wrapped around histones. Here, we describe how the histone methyltransferase ASH1L, once activated by MRG15, helps XPC and TFIIH to navigate through chromatin and induce global-genome NER hotspots. Upon UV irradiation, ASH1L adds H3K4me3 all over the genome (except in active gene promoters), thus priming chromatin for XPC relocations from native to damaged DNA. The ASH1L-MRG15 complex further recruits the histone chaperone FACT to DNA lesions. In the absence of ASH1L, MRG15 or FACT, XPC is misplaced and persists on damaged DNA without being able to deliver the lesions to TFIIH. We conclude that ASH1L-MRG15 makes damage verifiable by the NER machinery through the sequential deposition of H3K4me3 and FACT.

Distinct roles for canonical and variant histone H3 lysine-36 in Polycomb silencing

Polycomb complexes regulate cell type-specific gene expression programs through heritable silencing of target genes. Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) is essential for this process. Perturbation of H3K36 is thought to interfere with H3K27me3. We show that mutants of Drosophila replication-dependent (H3.2K36R) or replication-independent (H3.3K36R) histone H3 genes generally maintain Polycomb silencing and reach later stages of development. In contrast, combined (H3.3K36RH3.2K36R) mutants display widespread Hox gene misexpression and fail to develop past the first larval stage. Chromatin profiling revealed that the H3.2K36R mutation disrupts H3K27me3 levels broadly throughout silenced domains, whereas these regions are mostly unaffected in H3.3K36R animals. Analysis of H3.3 distributions showed that this histone is enriched at presumptive Polycomb response elements located outside of silenced domains but relatively depleted from those inside. We conclude that H3.2 and H3.3 K36 residues collaborate to repress Hox genes using different mechanisms.

Structural insight into ASH1L PHD finger recognizing methylated histone H3K4 and promoting cell growth in prostate cancer

ASH1L is a member of the Trithorax-group protein and acts as a histone methyltransferase for gene transcription activation. It is known that ASH1L modulates H3K4me3 and H3K36me2/3 at its gene targets, but its specific mechanism of histone recognition is insufficiently understood. In this study, we found that the ASH1L plant homeodomain (PHD) finger interacts with mono-, di-, and trimethylated states of H3K4 peptides with comparable affinities, indicating that ASH1L PHD non-selectively binds to all three methylation states of H3K4. We solved nuclear magnetic resonance structures picturing the ASH1L PHD finger binding to the dimethylated H3K4 peptide and found that a narrow binding groove and residue composition in the methylated-lysine binding pocket restricts the necessary interaction with the dimethyl-ammonium moiety of K4. In addition, we found that the ASH1L protein is overexpressed in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) PC3 and DU145 cells in comparison to PCa LNCaP cells. The knockdown of ASH1L modulated gene expression and cellular pathways involved in apoptosis and cell cycle regulation and consequently induced cell cycle arrest, cell apoptosis, and reduced colony-forming abilities in PC3 and DU145 cells. The overexpression of the C-terminal core of ASH1L but not the PHD deletion mutant increased the overall H3K36me2 level but had no effect on the H3K4me2/3 level. Overall, our study identifies the ASH1L PHD finger as the first native reader that non-selectively recognizes the three methylation states of H3K4. Additionally, ASH1L is required for the deregulation of cell cycle and survival in PCas.

Structural and functional specificity of H3K36 methylation

The methylation of histone H3 at lysine 36 (H3K36me) is essential for maintaining genomic stability. Indeed, this methylation mark is essential for proper transcription, recombination, and DNA damage response. Loss- and gain-of-function mutations in H3K36 methyltransferases are closely linked to human developmental disorders and various cancers. Structural analyses suggest that nucleosomal components such as the linker DNA and a hydrophobic patch constituted by histone H2A and H3 are likely determinants of H3K36 methylation in addition to the histone H3 tail, which encompasses H3K36 and the catalytic SET domain. Interaction of H3K36 methyltransferases with the nucleosome collaborates with regulation of their auto-inhibitory changes fine-tunes the precision of H3K36me in mediating dimethylation by NSD2 and NSD3 as well as trimethylation by Set2/SETD2. The identification of specific structural features and various cis-acting factors that bind to different forms of H3K36me, particularly the di-(H3K36me2) and tri-(H3K36me3) methylated forms of H3K36, have highlighted the intricacy of H3K36me functional significance. Here, we consolidate these findings and offer structural insight to the regulation of H3K36me2 to H3K36me3 conversion. We also discuss the mechanisms that underlie the cooperation between H3K36me and other chromatin modifications (in particular, H3K27me3, H3 acetylation, DNA methylation and N⁶-methyladenosine in RNAs) in the physiological regulation of the epigenomic functions of chromatin.

Histone Methylases and Demethylases Regulating Antagonistic Methyl Marks: Changes Occurring in Cancer

Epigenetic regulation of gene expression is crucial to the determination of cell fate in development and differentiation, and the Polycomb (PcG) and Trithorax (TrxG) groups of proteins, acting antagonistically as complexes, play a major role in this regulation. Although originally identified in Drosophila, these complexes are conserved in evolution and the components are well defined in mammals. Each complex contains a protein with methylase activity (KMT), which can add methyl groups to a specific lysine in histone tails, histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27), by PcG complexes, and H3K4 and H3K36 by TrxG complexes, creating transcriptionally repressive or active marks, respectively. Histone demethylases (KDMs), identified later, added a new dimension to histone methylation, and mutations or changes in levels of expression are seen in both methylases and demethylases and in components of the PcG and TrX complexes across a range of cancers. In this review, we focus on both methylases and demethylases governing the methylation state of the suppressive and active marks and consider their action and interaction in normal tissues and in cancer. A picture is emerging which indicates that the changes which occur in cancer during methylation of histone lysines can lead to repression of genes, including tumour suppressor genes, or to the activation of oncogenes. Methylases or demethylases, which are themselves tumour suppressors, are highly mutated. Novel targets for cancer therapy have been identified and a methylase (KMT6A/EZH2), which produces the repressive H3K27me3 mark, and a demethylase (KDM1A/LSD1), which demethylates the active H3K4me2 mark, are now under clinical evaluation.

The role of H3K36 methylation and associated methyltransferases in chromosome-specific gene regulation

In Drosophila, two chromosomes require special mechanisms to balance their transcriptional output to the rest of the genome. These are the male-specific lethal complex targeting the male X chromosome and Painting of fourth targeting chromosome 4. Here, we explore the role of histone H3 methylated at lysine-36 (H3K36) and the associated methyltransferases—Set2, NSD, and Ash1—in these two chromosome-specific systems. We show that the loss of Set2 impairs the MSL complex–mediated dosage compensation; however, the effect is not recapitulated by H3K36 replacement and indicates an alternative target of Set2. Unexpectedly, balanced transcriptional output from the fourth chromosome requires intact H3K36 and depends on the additive functions of NSD and Ash1. We conclude that H3K36 methylation and the associated methyltransferases are important factors to balance transcriptional output of the male X chromosome and the fourth chromosome. Furthermore, our study highlights the pleiotropic effects of these enzymes.

The Paramount Role of Drosophila melanogaster in the Study of Epigenetics: From Simple Phenotypes to Molecular Dissection and Higher-Order Genome Organization

Simple Summary

Since its adoption as a model organism more than a hundred years ago, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has led to major discoveries in biology, notably in epigenetics. Epigenetics studies the changes in gene function inherited through mitosis or meiosis that are not due to modifications in the DNA sequence. The first discoveries in epigenetics emerged from analyses of the perturbations of simple phenotypes such as the bristle position or cuticle pigmentation. Identification of the mutated genes led to the discovery of major chromatin regulators, which were found to be conserved in other insects, and unexpectedly, in all metazoans. Many of them deposit post-translational modifications on histones, the proteins around which the DNA is wrapped. Others are chromatin remodeling complexes that move, eject, or exchange nucleosomes. We review here the role of D. melanogaster research in three important epigenetic fields: The formation of heterochromatin, the repression of mobile DNA elements by small RNAs, and the regulation of gene expression by the antagonistic Polycomb and Trithorax complexes. We then review how genetic tools available in D. melanogaster have allowed us to examine the role of histone marks and led to more global discoveries on chromatin organization. Lastly, we discuss the impact of varying environmental conditions on epigenetic regulation.

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster has played a paramount role in epigenetics, the study of changes in gene function inherited through mitosis or meiosis that are not due to changes in the DNA sequence. By analyzing simple phenotypes, such as the bristle position or cuticle pigmentation, as read-outs of regulatory processes, the identification of mutated genes led to the discovery of major chromatin regulators. These are often conserved in distantly related organisms such as vertebrates or even plants. Many of them deposit, recognize, or erase post-translational modifications on histones (histone marks). Others are members of chromatin remodeling complexes that move, eject, or exchange nucleosomes. We review the role of D. melanogaster research in three epigenetic fields: Heterochromatin formation and maintenance, the repression of transposable elements by piRNAs, and the regulation of gene expression by the antagonistic Polycomb and Trithorax complexes. We then describe how genetic tools available in D. melanogaster allowed to examine the role of histone marks and show that some histone marks are dispensable for gene regulation, whereas others play essential roles. Next, we describe how D. melanogaster has been particularly important in defining chromatin types, higher-order chromatin structures, and their dynamic changes during development. Lastly, we discuss the role of epigenetics in a changing environment.

Therapeutic Opportunities of Targeting Canonical and Noncanonical PcG/TrxG Functions in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Transcriptional deregulation is a key driver of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a heterogeneous blood cancer with poor survival rates. Polycomb group (PcG) and Trithorax group (TrxG) genes, originally identified in Drosophila melanogaster several decades ago as master regulators of cellular identity and epigenetic memory, not only are important in mammalian development but also play a key role in AML disease biology. In addition to their classical canonical antagonistic transcriptional functions, noncanonical synergistic and nontranscriptional functions of PcG and TrxG are emerging. Here, we review the biochemical properties of major mammalian PcG and TrxG complexes and their roles in AML disease biology, including disease maintenance as well as drug resistance. We summarize current efforts on targeting PcG and TrxG for treatment of AML and propose rational synthetic lethality and drug-induced antagonistic pleiotropy options involving PcG and TrxG as potential new therapeutic avenues for treatment of AML.

The Trithorax group protein ASH1 requires a combination of BAH domain and AT hooks, but not the SET domain, for mitotic chromatin binding and survival

The Drosophila Trithorax group (TrxG) protein ASH1 remains associated with mitotic chromatin through mechanisms that are poorly understood. ASH1 dimethylates histone H3 at lysine 36 via its SET domain. Here, we identify domains of the TrxG protein ASH1 that are required for mitotic chromatin attachment in living Drosophila. Quantitative live imaging demonstrates that ASH1 requires AT hooks and the BAH domain but not the SET domain for full chromatin binding in metaphase, and that none of these domains are essential for interphase binding. Genetic experiments show that disruptions of the AT hooks and the BAH domain together, but not deletion of the SET domain alone, are lethal. Transcriptional profiling demonstrates that intact ASH1 AT hooks and the BAH domain are required to maintain expression levels of a specific set of genes, including several involved in cell identity and survival. This study identifies in vivo roles for specific ASH1 domains in mitotic binding, gene regulation, and survival that are distinct from its functions as a histone methyltransferase.

Allosteric regulation of histone lysine methyltransferases: from context-specific regulation to selective drugs

Histone lysine methyltransferases (HKMTs) are key regulators of many cellular processes. By definition, HKMTs catalyse the methylation of lysine residues in histone proteins. The enzymatic activities of HKMTs are under precise control, with their allosteric regulation emerging as a prevalent paradigm. We review the molecular mechanisms of allosteric regulation of HKMTs using well-studied histone H3 (K4, K9, K27 and K36) methyltransferases as examples. We discuss the current advances and future potential in targeting allosteric sites of HKMTs for drug development.

Drosophila melanogaster: a fruitful model for oncohistones

Drosophila melanogaster has proven to be a powerful genetic model to study human disease. Approximately 75% of human disease-associated genes have homologs in the fruit fly and regulatory pathways are highly conserved in Drosophila compared to humans. Drosophila is an established model organism for the study of genetics and developmental biology related to human disease and has also made a great contribution to epigenetic research. Many key factors that regulate chromatin condensation through effects on histone post-translational modifications were first discovered in genetic screens in Drosophila. Recently, the importance of chromatin regulators in cancer progression has been uncovered, leading to a rapid expansion in the knowledge on how perturbations of chromatin can result in the pathogenesis of human cancer. In this review, we provide examples of how Drosophila melanogaster has contributed to better understanding the detrimental effects of mutant forms of histones, called 'oncohistones', that are found in different human tumours.

Role of Ash1l in Tourette syndrome and other neurodevelopmental disorders

Ash1l potentially contributes to neurodevelopmental diseases. Although specific Ash1l mutations are rare, they have led to informative studies in animal models that may bring therapeutic advances. Ash1l is highly expressed in the brain and correlates with the neuropathology of Tourette syndrome (TS), autism spectrum disorder, and intellectual disability during development, implicating shared epigenetic factors and overlapping neuropathological mechanisms. Functional convergence of Ash1l generated several significant signaling pathways: chromatin remodeling and transcriptional regulation, protein synthesis and cellular metabolism, and synapse development and function. Here, we systematically review the literature on Ash1l, including its discovery, expression, function, regulation, implication in the nervous system, signaling pathway, mutations, and putative involvement in TS and other neurodevelopmental traits. Such findings highlight Ash1l pleiotropy and the necessity of transcending a single gene to complicated mechanisms of network convergence underlying these diseases. With the progress in functional genomic analysis (highlighted in this review), and although the importance and necessity of Ash1l becomes increasingly apparent in the medical field, further research is required to discover the precise function and molecular regulatory mechanisms related to Ash1l. Thus, a new perspective is proposed for basic scientific research and clinical interventions for cross‐disorder diseases.

Knockdown of ASH1L methyltransferase induced apoptosis inhibiting proliferation and H3K36 methylation in bovine cumulus cells

This study aims to investigate the expression and function of absent, small, or homeotic 1-like (ASH1L) methyltransferase in bovine cumulus cells in order to reveal by which mechanisms ASH1L regulates epigenetic modification and apoptosis in cumulus cells. The location of ASH1L and the methylation pattern of H3K36 were detected using immunofluorescence staining in cumulus cells. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and western blotting were used to screen for effective siRNA targeting the ASH1L gene. Also, the mRNA expression levels of apoptosis-related genes and polycomb inhibitory complex genes were estimated by qPCR after knocking down the ASH1L gene in bovine cumulus cells. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were measured with the CCK-8 method and Annexin V-FITC by flow cytometry, respectively. The results of immunofluorescence analysis showed that ASH1L is located in the nucleus of bovine cumulus cells and is distributed in a dotted pattern. ASH1L knockdown in cumulus cells induced a decrease in the levels of H3K36me1/2/3 methylation (P < 0.05). Additionally, ASH1L knockdown inhibited cell proliferation, increased the apoptosis rate, and upregulated the expression of apoptosis genes CASPASE-3, BAX and BAX/BCL-2 ratio (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the mRNA expression levels of EZH2 and SUZ12, two subunits of PRC2 protein, were increased in cells with ASH1L knockdown (P < 0.05). Therefore, the expression of ASH1L methyltransferase and its function in on the apoptosis of bovine cumulus cells were first studied. The mechanism by which ASH1L regulates the histone methylation and apoptosis in cumulus cells was also revealed.

Dynamic Competition of Polycomb and Trithorax in Transcriptional Programming

Predicting regulatory potential from primary DNA sequences or transcription factor binding patterns is not possible. However, the annotation of the genome by chromatin proteins, histone modifications, and differential compaction is largely sufficient to reveal the locations of genes and their differential activity states. The Polycomb Group (PcG) and Trithorax Group (TrxG) proteins are the central players in this cell type-specific chromatin organization. PcG function was originally viewed as being solely repressive and irreversible, as observed at the homeotic loci in flies and mammals. However, it is now clear that modular and reversible PcG function is essential at most developmental genes. Focusing mainly on recent advances, we review evidence for how PcG and TrxG patterns change dynamically during cell type transitions. The ability to implement cell type-specific transcriptional programming with exquisite fidelity is essential for normal development.

Unleashing the Power of ASH1L Methyltransferase

Trithorax histone methyltransferase Ash1/ASH1L is tightly regulated because it activates developmental gene transcription and counteracts Polycomb silencing. In this issue of Structure, Lee et al. (2019) and Hou et al. (2019) report the crystal structure of ASH1L bound to its activator MRG15 and suggest a mechanism that releases ASH1L auto-inhibition.

Genetic Dissection Reveals the Role of Ash1 Domains in Counteracting Polycomb Repression

Antagonistic functions of Polycomb and Trithorax proteins are essential for proper development of all metazoans. While the Polycomb proteins maintain the repressed state of many key developmental genes, the Trithorax proteins ensure that these genes stay active in cells where they have to be expressed. Ash1 is the Trithorax protein that was proposed to counteract Polycomb repression by methylating lysine 36 of histone H3. However, it was recently shown that genetic replacement of Drosophila histone H3 with the variant that carried Arginine instead of Lysine at position 36 did not impair the ability of Ash1 to counteract Polycomb repression. This argues that Ash1 counteracts Polycomb repression by methylating yet unknown substrate(s) and that it is time to look beyond Ash1 methyltransferase SET domain, at other evolutionary conserved parts of the protein that received little attention. Here we used Drosophila genetics to demonstrate that Ash1 requires each of the BAH, PHD and SET domains to counteract Polycomb repression, while AT hooks are dispensable. Our findings argue that, in vivo, Ash1 acts as a multimer. Thereby it can combine the input of the SET domain and PHD-BAH cassette residing in different peptides. Finally, using new loss of function alleles, we show that zygotic Ash1 is required to prevent erroneous repression of homeotic genes of the bithorax complex in the embryo.

KDM2A/B lysine demethylases and their alternative isoforms in development and disease

Aberrant levels of histone modifications lead to chromatin malfunctioning and consequently to various developmental defects and human diseases. Therefore, the proteins bearing the ability to modify histones have been extensively studied and the molecular mechanisms of their action are now fairly well understood. However, little attention has been paid to naturally occurring alternative isoforms of chromatin modifying proteins and to their biological roles. In this review, we focus on mammalian KDM2A and KDM2B, the only two lysine demethylases whose genes have been described to produce also an alternative isoform lacking the N-terminal demethylase domain. These short KDM2A/B-SF isoforms arise through alternative promoter usage and seem to play important roles in development and disease. We hypothesise about the biological significance of these alternative isoforms, which might represent a more common evolutionarily conserved regulatory mechanism.

Polycomb Assemblies Multitask to Regulate Transcription

The Polycomb system is made of an evolutionary ancient group of proteins, present throughout plants and animals. Known initially from developmental studies with the fly Drosophila melanogaster, they were associated with stable sustainment of gene repression and maintenance of cell identity. Acting as multiprotein assemblies with an ability to modify chromatin, through chemical additions to histones and organization of topological domains, they have been involved subsequently in control of developmental transitions and in cell homeostasis. Recent work has unveiled an association of Polycomb components with transcriptionally active loci and the promotion of gene expression, in clear contrast with conventional recognition as repressors. Focusing on mammalian models, I review here advances concerning roles in transcriptional control. Among new findings highlighted is the regulation of their catalytic properties, recruiting to targets, and activities in chromatin organization and compartmentalization. The need for a more integrated approach to the study of the Polycomb system, given its fundamental complexity and its adaptation to cell context, is discussed.

Ash1 counteracts Polycomb repression independent of histone H3 lysine 36 methylation

Polycomb repression is critical for metazoan development. Equally important but less studied is the Trithorax system, which safeguards Polycomb target genes from the repression in cells where they have to remain active. It was proposed that the Trithorax system acts via methylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 and lysine 36 (H3K36), thereby inhibiting histone methyltransferase activity of the Polycomb complexes. Here we test this hypothesis by asking whether the Trithorax group protein Ash1 requires H3K36 methylation to counteract Polycomb repression. We show that Ash1 is the only Drosophila H3K36-specific methyltransferase necessary to prevent excessive Polycomb repression of homeotic genes. Unexpectedly, our experiments reveal no correlation between the extent of H3K36 methylation and the resistance to Polycomb repression. Furthermore, we find that complete substitution of the zygotic histone H3 with a variant in which lysine 36 is replaced by arginine does not cause excessive repression of homeotic genes. Our results suggest that the model, where the Trithorax group proteins methylate histone H3 to inhibit the histone methyltransferase activity of the Polycomb complexes, needs revision.

Structural Insights into Stimulation of Ash1L's H3K36 Methyltransferase Activity through Mrg15 Binding

The evolutionarily conserved Trithorax group protein Ash1 is a SET domain histone methyltransferase that mono- and dimethylates lysine 36 of histone H3 (H3K36). Ash1 forms a complex with Mrg15 and Nurf55, and the binding of Mrg15 greatly stimulates the catalytic activity of Ash1, yet the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unknown. Here we report the crystal structure of the tandem Mrg15-interacting and SET domains of human Ash1L in complex with Mrg15. Ash1L interacts with Mrg15 principally via a segment located N-terminal to the catalytic SET domain. Surprisingly, an autoinhibitory loop in the post-SET region of Ash1L is destabilized on Mrg15 binding despite no direct contact. Dynamics of the autoinhibitory loop can be attributed to subtle structural changes of the S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) binding pocket induced by Mrg15 binding, implicating a mechanism of conformational coupling between SAM and substrate binding sites. The findings broaden the understanding of regulation of H3K36 methyltransferases.

Structural Basis of MRG15-Mediated Activation of the ASH1L Histone Methyltransferase by Releasing an Autoinhibitory Loop

Human ASH1L is the catalytic subunit of the conserved histone methyltransferase (HMTase) complex AMC that dimethylates lysine 36 in histone H3 (H3K36me2) to promote gene transcription in mammals and flies. Unlike AMC, ASH1L alone shows poor catalytic activity, because access to its substrate binding pocket is blocked by an autoinhibitory loop (AI loop) from the postSET domain. We report the crystal structure of the minimal catalytic active AMC complex containing ASH1L and its partner subunit MRG15. The structure reveals how binding of the MRG domain of MRG15 to a conserved FxLP motif in ASH1L results in the displacement of the AI loop to permit substrates to access the catalytic pocket of the ASH1L SET domain. Together, ASH1L activation by MRG15 therefore represents a delicate regulatory mechanism for how a cofactor activates an SET domain HMTase by releasing autoinhibition.

Epigenetic Regulation of Chromatin in Prostate Cancer

Epigenetics refers to mitotically/meiotically heritable mechanisms that regulate gene transcription without a need for changes in the DNA code. Covalent modifications of DNA, in the form of methylation, and histone post-translational modifications, in the form of acetylation and methylation, constitute the epigenetic code of a cell. Both DNA and histone modifications are highly dynamic and often work in unison to define the epigenetic state of a cell. Most epigenetic mechanisms regulate gene transcription by affecting localized/genome-wide transitions between heterochromatin and euchromatin states, thereby altering the accessibility of the transcriptional machinery and in turn, reduce/increase transcriptional output. Altered chromatin structure is associated with cancer progression, and epigenetic plasticity primarily governs the resistance of cancer cells to therapeutic agents. In this chapter, we specifically focus on regulators of histone methylation and acetylation, the two well-studied chromatin post-translational modifications, in the context of prostate cancer.

ASH1-catalyzed H3K36 methylation drives gene repression and marks H3K27me2/3-competent chromatin

Methylation of histone H3 at lysine 36 (H3K36me), a widely-distributed chromatin mark, largely results from association of the lysine methyltransferase (KMT) SET-2 with RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), but most eukaryotes also have additional H3K36me KMTs that act independently of RNAPII. These include the orthologs of ASH1, which are conserved in animals, plants, and fungi but whose function and control are poorly understood. We found that Neurospora crassa has just two H3K36 KMTs, ASH1 and SET-2, and were able to explore the function and distribution of each enzyme independently. While H3K36me deposited by SET-2 marks active genes, inactive genes are modified by ASH1 and its activity is critical for their repression. ASH1-marked chromatin can be further modified by methylation of H3K27, and ASH1 catalytic activity modulates the accumulation of H3K27me2/3 both positively and negatively. These findings provide new insight into ASH1 function, H3K27me2/3 establishment, and repression in facultative heterochromatin.

Not all genes in a cell’s DNA are active all the time. There are several ways to control this activity. One is by altering how the DNA is packaged into cells. DNA strands are wrapped around proteins called histones to form nucleosomes. Nucleosomes can then be packed together tightly, to restrict access to the DNA at genes that are not active, or loosely to allow access to the DNA of active genes.

Chemical marks, such as methyl groups, can be attached to particular sites on histones to influence how they pack together. One important site for such marks is known as position 36 on histone H3, or H3K36 for short. Correctly adding methyl groups to this site is critical for normal development, and when this process goes wrong it can lead to diseases like cancer. An enzyme called SET-2 oversees the methylation of H3K36 in fungi, plants and animals. However, many species have several other enzymes that can also add methyl groups to H3K36, and their roles are less clear.

A type of fungus called Neurospora crassa contains just two enzymes that can add methyl groups to H3K36: SET-2, and another enzyme called ASH1. By performing experiments that inactivated SET-2 and ASH1 in this fungus, Bicocca et al. found that each enzyme works on a different set of genes. Genes in regions marked by SET-2 were accessible for the cell to use, while genes marked by ASH1 were inaccessible. ASH1 also affects whether a methyl group is added to another site on histone H3. This mark is important for controlling the activity of genes that are critical for development.

ASH1 is found in many other organisms, including humans. The results presented by Bicocca et al. could therefore be built upon to understand the more complicated systems for regulating H3K36 methylation in other species. From there, we can investigate how to intervene when things go wrong during developmental disorders and cancer.

Roles of H3K36-specific histone methyltransferases in transcription: antagonizing silencing and safeguarding transcription fidelity

Histone H3K36 methylation is well-known for its role in active transcription. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, H3K36 methylation is mediated solely by SET2 during transcription elongation. In metazoans, multiple H3K36-specific methyltransferases exist and contribute to distinct biochemical activities and subsequent functions. In this review, we focus on the H3K36-specific histone methyltransferases in metazoans, and discuss their enzymatic activity regulation and their roles in antagonizing Polycomb silencing and safeguarding transcription fidelity.