Nuclear export of signal recognition particle RNA is a facilitated process that involves the Alu sequence domain

Nuclear SRP9/SRP14 heterodimer transcriptionally regulates 7SL and BC200 RNA expression

The SRP9/SRP14 heterodimer is a central component of signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA (7SL) processing and Alu retrotransposition. In this study, we sought to establish the role of nuclear SRP9/SRP14 in the transcriptional regulation of 7SL and BC200 RNA. 7SL and BC200 RNA steady-state levels, rate of decay, and transcriptional activity were evaluated under SRP9/SRP14 knockdown conditions. Immunofluorescent imaging, and subcellular fractionation of MCF-7 cells, revealed a distinct nuclear localization for SRP9/SRP14. The relationship between this localization and transcriptional activity at 7SL and BC200 genes was also examined. These findings demonstrate a novel nuclear function of SRP9/SRP14 establishing that this heterodimer transcriptionally regulates 7SL and BC200 RNA expression. We describe a model in which SRP9/SRP14 cotranscriptionally regulate 7SL and BC200 RNA expression. Our model is also a plausible pathway for regulating Alu RNA transcription and is consistent with the hypothesized roles of SRP9/SRP14 transporting 7SL RNA into the nucleolus for posttranscriptional processing, and trafficking of Alu RNA for retrotransposition.

In vivo assembly of eukaryotic signal recognition particle: A still enigmatic process involving the SMN complex

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a universally conserved non-coding ribonucleoprotein complex that is essential for targeting transmembrane and secretory proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Its composition and size varied during evolution. In mammals, SRP contains one RNA molecule, 7SL RNA, and six proteins: SRP9, 14, 19, 54, 68 and 72. Despite a very good understanding of the SRP structure and of the SRP assembly in vitro, how SRP is assembled in vivo remains largely enigmatic. Here we review current knowledge on how the 7SL RNA is assembled with core proteins to form functional RNP particles in cells. SRP biogenesis is believed to take place both in the nucleolus and in the cytoplasm and to rely on the survival of motor neuron complex, whose defect leads to spinal muscular atrophy.

Exportin-5 mediates nuclear export of SRP RNA in vertebrates

The signal recognition particle is a ribonucleoprotein complex that is essential for the translocation of nascent proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum. It has been shown that the RNA component (SRP RNA) is exported from the nucleus by CRM1 in the budding yeast. However, how SRP RNA is exported in higher species has been elusive. Here, we show that SRP RNA does not use the CRM1 pathway in Xenopus oocytes. Instead, SRP RNA uses the same export pathway as pre-miRNA and tRNA as showed by cross-competition experiments. Consistently, the recombinant Exportin-5 protein specifically stimulated export of SRP RNA as well as of pre-miRNA and tRNA, whereas an antibody raised against Exportin-5 specifically inhibited export of the same RNA species. Moreover, biotinylated SRP RNA can pull down Exportin-5 but not CRM1 from HeLa cell nuclear extracts in a RanGTP-dependent manner. These results, taken together, strongly suggest that the principal export receptor for SRP RNA in vertebrates is Exportin-5 unlike in the budding yeast.

Protein interactions with piALU RNA indicates putative participation of retroRNA in the cell cycle, DNA repair and chromatin assembly

Recent analyses suggest that transposable element-derived transcripts are processed to yield a variety of small RNA species that play critical functional roles in gene regulation and chromatin organization as well as genome stability and maintenance. Here we report a mass spectrometry analysis of an RNA-affinity complex isolation using a piRNA homologous sequence derived from Alu retrotransposal RNA. Our data point to potential roles for piALU RNAs in DNA repair, cell cycle and chromatin regulations.

miRISC recruits decapping factors to miRNA targets to enhance their degradation

MicroRNA (miRNA)-induced silencing complexes (miRISCs) repress translation and promote degradation of miRNA targets. Target degradation occurs through the 5′-to-3′ messenger RNA (mRNA) decay pathway, wherein, after shortening of the mRNA poly(A) tail, the removal of the 5′ cap structure by decapping triggers irreversible decay of the mRNA body. Here, we demonstrate that miRISC enhances the association of the decapping activators DCP1, Me31B and HPat with deadenylated miRNA targets that accumulate when decapping is blocked. DCP1 and Me31B recruitment by miRISC occurs before the completion of deadenylation. Remarkably, miRISC recruits DCP1, Me31B and HPat to engineered miRNA targets transcribed by RNA polymerase III, which lack a cap structure, a protein-coding region and a poly(A) tail. Furthermore, miRISC can trigger decapping and the subsequent degradation of mRNA targets independently of ongoing deadenylation. Thus, miRISC increases the local concentration of the decapping machinery on miRNA targets to facilitate decapping and irreversibly shut down their translation.

Stress-induced lncRNAs evade nuclear degradation and enter the translational machinery

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles in the regulation of gene expression. In fission yeast, glucose starvation triggers a transcriptional cascade of polyadenylated lncRNAs in the upstream region of the fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase gene (fbp1(+) ), which is correlated with stepwise chromatin remodeling and necessary for the massive induction of fbp1(+) mRNA. Here, we show that these novel metabolic stress-induced lncRNAs (mlonRNAs) are 5'-capped, less stable than fbp1(+) mRNA and sensitive to a certain extent to the nuclear exosome cofactor Rrp6. However, most mlonRNAs seem to escape nuclear degradation and are exported to the cytoplasm, where they localize to polysomes precisely during glucose starvation-induced global translation inhibition. It is likely that ribosomes tend to accumulate in the upstream region of mlonRNAs. Although mlonRNAs contain an unusual amount of upstream AUGs (uAUGs) and small open reading frames (uORFs), they escape Upf1-mediated targeting to the non-sense-mediated decay (NMD) pathway. The deletion of Upf1 had no effect on mlonRNA stability, but considerably destabilized fbp1(+) mRNA, hinting toward a possible novel role of Upf1. Our findings suggest that the stability of mlonRNAs is distinctly regulated from mRNA and previously described noncoding transcripts.

Implication of the SMN complex in the biogenesis and steady state level of the signal recognition particle

Spinal muscular atrophy is a severe motor neuron disease caused by reduced levels of the ubiquitous Survival of MotoNeurons (SMN) protein. SMN is part of a complex that is essential for spliceosomal UsnRNP biogenesis. Signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein particle crucial for co-translational targeting of secretory and membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. SRP biogenesis is a nucleo-cytoplasmic multistep process in which the protein components, except SRP54, assemble with 7S RNA in the nucleolus. Then, SRP54 is incorporated after export of the pre-particle into the cytoplasm. The assembly factors necessary for SRP biogenesis remain to be identified. Here, we show that 7S RNA binds to purified SMN complexes in vitro and that SMN complexes associate with SRP in cellular extracts. We identified the RNA determinants required. Moreover, we report a specific reduction of 7S RNA levels in the spinal cord of SMN-deficient mice, and in a Schizosaccharomyces pombe strain carrying a temperature-degron allele of SMN. Additionally, microinjected antibodies directed against SMN or Gemin2 interfere with the association of SRP54 with 7S RNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Our data show that reduced levels of the SMN protein lead to defect in SRP steady-state level and describe the SMN complex as the first identified cellular factor required for SRP biogenesis.

Multiple Roles of Alu-Related Noncoding RNAs

Repetitive Alu and Alu-related elements are present in primates, tree shrews (Scandentia), and rodents and have expanded to 1.3 million copies in the human genome by nonautonomous retrotransposition. Pol III transcription from these elements occurs at low levels under normal conditions but increases transiently after stress, indicating a function of Alu RNAs in cellular stress response. Alu RNAs assemble with cellular proteins into ribonucleoprotein complexes and can be processed into the smaller scAlu RNAs. Alu and Alu-related RNAs play a role in regulating transcription and translation. They provide a source for the biogenesis of miRNAs and, embedded into mRNAs, can be targeted by miRNAs. When present as inverted repeats in mRNAs, they become substrates of the editing enzymes, and their modification causes the nuclear retention of these mRNAs. Certain Alu elements evolved into unique transcription units with specific expression profiles producing RNAs with highly specific cellular functions.

Discrete subcellular partitioning of human retrotransposon RNAs despite a common mechanism of genome insertion

Despite the immense significance retrotransposons have had for genome evolution much about their biology is unknown, including the processes of forming their ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles and transporting them about the cell. Suppression of retrotransposon expression, together with the presence of retrotransposon sequence within numerous mRNAs, makes tracking endogenous L1 RNP particles in cells problematic. We overcame these difficulties by assaying in living and fixed cells tagged-RNPs generated from constructs expressing retrotransposition-competent L1s. In this way, we demonstrate for the first time the subcellular colocalization of L1 RNA and proteins ORF1p and ORF2p, and show their targeting together to cytoplasmic foci. Foci are often associated with markers of cytoplasmic stress granules. Furthermore, mutation analyses reveal that ORF1p can direct L1 RNP distribution within the cell. We also assayed RNA localization of the non-autonomous retrotransposons Alu and SVA. Despite a requirement for the L1 integration machinery, each manifests unique features of subcellular RNA distribution. In nuclei Alu RNA forms small round foci partially associated with marker proteins for coiled bodies, suborganelles involved in the processing of non-coding RNAs. SVA RNA patterning is distinctive, being cytoplasmic but without prominent foci and concentrated in large nuclear aggregates that often ring nucleoli. Such variability predicts significant differences in the life cycles of these elements.

LambdaN-GFP: an RNA reporter system for live-cell imaging

We describe a GFP-based RNA reporter system (lambdaN-GFP) to visualize RNA molecules in live mammalian cells. It consists of GFP fused to an arginine-rich peptide derived from the phage lambda N protein, lambdaN22, which binds a unique minimal RNA motif and can be used to tag any RNA molecule. LambdaN-GFP uses a small and easy to engineer RNA tag, reducing the likelihood of perturbing the function of the tagged RNA molecule.

The Trypanosoma brucei signal recognition particle lacks the Alu-domain-binding proteins: purification and functional analysis of its binding proteins by RNAi

Trypanosomes are protozoan parasites that have a major impact on human health and that of livestock. These parasites represent a very early branch in the eukaryotic lineage, and possess unique RNA processing mechanisms. The trypanosome signal recognition particle (SRP) is also unusual in being the first signal recognition particle described in nature to be comprised of two RNA molecules, the 7SL RNA and a tRNA-like molecule. In this study, we further elucidated the unique properties of this particle. The genes encoding three SRP proteins (SRP19, SRP72 and SRP68) were identified by bioinformatics analysis. Silencing of these genes by RNAi suggests that the SRP-mediated protein translocation pathway is essential for growth. The depletion of SRP72 and SRP68 induced sudden death, most probably as a result of toxicity due to the accumulation of the pre-SRP in the nucleolus. Purification of the trypanosome particle to homogeneity, by TAP-tagging, identified four SRP proteins (SRP72, SRP68, SRP54 and SRP19), but no Alu-domain-binding protein homologs. This study highlights the unique features of the trypanosome SRP complex and further supports the hypothesis that the tRNA-like molecule present in this particle may replace the function of the Alu-domain-binding proteins present in many eukaryotic SRP complexes.

Subcellular Distribution of Small Interfering RNA: Directed Delivery Through RNA Polymerase III Expression Cassettes and Localization by In Situ Hybridization

Reduction in the expression of specific genes through small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) is dependent on the colocalization of siRNAs with other components of the RNA interference (RNAi) pathways within the cell. The expression of siRNAs within cells from cassettes that are derived from genes transcribed by RNA polymerase III (pol III) and provide for selective subcellular distribution of their products can be used to direct siRNAs to the cellular pathways. Expression from the human U6 promoter, resulting in siRNA accumulation in the nucleus, is effective in reducing gene expression, whereas cytoplasmic and nucleolar localization of the siRNA when expressed from the 5S or 7 SL promoters is not effective. The distribution of siRNA within the cell is determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Although the long uninterrupted duplex of siRNA makes it difficult to detect with DNA oligonucleotide probes, labeled oligonucleotide probes with 2'-O-methyl RNA backbones provide the stability needed for a strong signal. These methods contribute to studies of the interconnected cellular RNAi pathways and are useful in adapting RNAi as a tool to determine gene function and develop RNA-based therapeutics.

Alu's dimeric consensus sequence destabilizes its transcripts

The effect that different regions of the Alu consensus sequence have upon the stability and accumulation of its RNA polymerase III (Pol III) directed transcripts was determined by transiently overexpressing Alu deletion and chimeric constructs in human 293 cells. Transcripts of the left Alu monomer are more stable than those of the full-length consensus sequence and any additional 3' sequence beyond the left monomer destabilizes the resulting transcript. Neither the middle A-rich region nor the 3' A-rich tail specifically affect the stability of Alu transcripts. However, the right monomer is inherently less stable than corresponding left monomer transcripts. Alu's dimeric structure and sequences peculiar to the right monomer each limit the stability and steady state accumulation of its transcripts. A host requirement to rapidly metabolize Alu RNA or restrict its abundance may have selected for these two features of the Alu consensus sequence.

Signal recognition particle-dependent protein targeting, universal to all kingdoms of life

The signal recognition particle (SRP) and its membrane-bound receptor represent a ubiquitous protein-targeting device utilized by organisms as different as bacteria and humans, archaea and plants. The unifying concept of SRP-dependent protein targeting is that SRP binds to signal sequences of newly synthesized proteins as they emerge from the ribosome. In eukaryotes this interaction arrests or retards translation elongation until SRP targets the ribosome-nascent chain complexes via the SRP receptor to the translocation channel. Such channels are present in the endoplasmic reticulum of eukaryotic cells, the thylakoids of chloroplasts, or the plasma membrane of prokaryotes. The minimal functional unit of SRP consists of a signal sequence-recognizing protein and a small RNA. The as yet most complex version is the mammalian SRP whose RNA, together with six proteinaceous subunits, undergo an intricate assembly process. The preferential substrates of SRP possess especially hydrophobic signal sequences. Interactions between SRP and its receptor, the ribosome, the signal sequence, and the target membrane are regulated by GTP hydrolysis. SRP-dependent protein targeting in bacteria and chloroplasts slightly deviate from the canonical mechanism found in eukaryotes. Pro- and eukaryotic cells harbour regulatory mechanisms to prevent a malfunction of the SRP pathway.

Localized expression of small RNA inhibitors in human cells

Several types of small RNAs have been proposed as gene expression repressors with great potential for use in gene therapy. RNA polymerase III (pol III) provides an ideal means of expressing small RNAs in cells because its normal products are small, highly structured RNAs that are found in a variety of subcellular compartments. We have designed cassettes that use human pol III promoters for the high-level expression of small RNAs in the cytoplasm, nucleoplasm, and nucleolus. The levels and subcellular destinations of the transcripts are compared for transcripts expressed using the U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA), 5S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and the 7SL RNA component of the signal recognition particle. The most effective location for a particular inhibitory RNA is not necessarily predictable; thus these cassettes allow testing of the same RNA insert in multiple subcellular locations. Several small interfering RNA (siRNA) inserts were tested for efficacy. An siRNA insert that reduces lamin expression when transcribed from the U6 snRNA promoter in the nucleus has no effect on lamin expression when transcribed from 5S rRNA and 7SL RNA-based cassettes and found in the nucleolus and cytoplasm. To test further the generality of U6-driven siRNA inhibitors, siRNAs targeting HIV were tested by co-transfection with provirus in cell culture. Although the degree of HIV-1 inhibition varied among inserts, results show that the U6 cassette provides a means of expressing an siRNA-like inhibitor of HIV gene expression.

RNA interference of signal peptide-binding protein SRP54 elicits deleterious effects and protein sorting defects in trypanosomes

Trypanosomes are protozoan parasites that have a major impact on health. This family diverged very early from the eukaryotic lineage and possesses unique RNA processing mechanisms such as trans-splicing and RNA editing. The trypanosome signal recognition particle (SRP) has a unique composition compared with all known SRP complexes, because it contains two RNA molecules, the 7SL RNA and a tRNA-like molecule. RNA interference was utilized to elucidate the essentiality of the SRP pathway and its role in protein translocation in Trypanosoma brucei. The production of double stranded RNA specific for the signal peptide-binding protein SRP54 induced the degradation of the mRNA and a loss of the SRP54 protein. SRP54 depletion elicited inhibition in growth and cytokinesis, suggesting that the SRP pathway is essential. The translocation of four signal peptide-containing proteins was examined. Surprisingly, the proteins were translocated to the endoplasmic reticulum and properly processed. However, the surface EP procyclin, the lysosomal protein p67, and the flagellar pocket protein CRAM were mislocalized and accumulated in megavesicles, most likely because of a secondary effect on protein sorting. The translocation of these proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum under SRP54 depletion suggests that an alternative pathway for protein translocation exists in trypanosomes.

Signal recognition particle protein 19 is imported into the nucleus by importin 8 (RanBP8) and transportin

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a cytoplasmic RNA-protein complex that targets proteins to the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Although SRP functions in the cytoplasm, RNA microinjection and cDNA transfection experiments in animal cells, as well as genetic analyses in yeast, have indicated that SRP assembles in the nucleus. Nonetheless, the mechanisms responsible for nuclear-cytoplasmic transport of SRP RNA and SRP proteins are largely unknown. Here we show that the 19 kDa protein subunit of mammalian SRP, SRP19, was efficiently imported into the nucleus in vitro by two members of the importin β superfamily of transport receptors, importin 8 and transportin; SRP19 was also imported less efficiently by several other members of the importin β family. Although transportin is known to import a variety of proteins, SRP19 import is the first function assigned to importin 8. Furthermore, we show that a significant pool of endogenous SRP19 is located in the nucleus, as well as the nucleolus. Our results show that at least one mammalian SRP protein is specifically imported into the nucleus, by members of the importin β family of transport receptors, and the findings add additional evidence for nuclear assembly of SRP.

Biogenesis of the signal recognition particle (SRP) involves import of SRP proteins into the nucleolus, assembly with the SRP-RNA, and Xpo1p-mediated export

The signal recognition particle (SRP) targets nascent secretory proteins to the ER, but how and where the SRP assembles is largely unknown. Here we analyze the biogenesis of yeast SRP, which consists of an RNA molecule (scR1) and six proteins, by localizing all its components. Although scR1 is cytoplasmic in wild-type cells, nuclear localization was observed in cells lacking any one of the four SRP "core proteins" Srp14p, Srp21p, Srp68p, or Srp72p. Consistently, a major nucleolar pool was detected for these proteins. Sec65p, on the other hand, was found in both the nucleoplasm and the nucleolus, whereas Srp54p was predominantly cytoplasmic. Import of the core proteins into the nucleolus requires the ribosomal protein import receptors Pse1p and Kap123p/Yrb4p, which might, thus, constitute a nucleolar import pathway. Nuclear export of scR1 is mediated by the nuclear export signal receptor Xpo1p, is distinct from mRNA transport, and requires, as evidenced by the nucleolar accumulation of scR1 in a dis3/rrp44 exosome component mutant, an intact scR1 3' end. A subset of nucleoporins, including Nsp1p and Nup159p (Rat7p), are also necessary for efficient translocation of scR1 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. We propose that assembly of the SRP requires import of all SRP core proteins into the nucleolus, where they assemble into a pre-SRP with scR1. This particle can then be targeted to the nuclear pores and is subsequently exported to the cytoplasm in an Xpo1p-dependent way.

Nuclear export of yeast signal recognition particle lacking Srp54p by the Xpo1p/Crm1p NES-dependent pathway

BACKGROUND

The movement of macromolecules through the nuclear pores requires energy and transport receptors that bind both cargo and nuclear pores. Different molecules/complexes often require different transport receptors. The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a conserved cytosolic ribonucleoprotein that targets proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Previous studies have shown that the export of SRP RNA from the nucleus requires trans-acting factors and that SRP may be at least partly assembled in the nucleus, but little else is known about how it is assembled and exported into the cytoplasm.

RESULTS

Of the six proteins that constitute the yeast SRP, we found that all except Srp54p were imported into the nucleus. Four of these had nucleolar pools. The same four proteins are required for stability of the yeast SRP RNA scR1, suggesting that they assemble with the RNA in the nucleus to form a central core SRP. This core SRP was a competent export substrate. Of the remaining components, Sec65p entered the nucleus and was assembled onto the core particle there, whereas Srp54p was solely cytoplasmic. The export of SRP from the nucleus required the transport receptor Xpo1p/Crm1p and Yrb2p, both components of the pathway that exports leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES)-containing proteins from the nucleus.

CONCLUSIONS

The SRP is assembled in the nucleus into a complex lacking only Srp54p. It is then exported through the NES pathway into the cytoplasm where Srp54p binds to it. This transport route for a ribonucleoprotein complex is so far unique in yeast.

Signal recognition particle components in the nucleolus

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein composed of an Alu domain and an S domain. The S domain contains unique sequence SRP RNA and four SRP proteins: SRP19, SRP54, SRP68, and SRP72. SRP interacts with ribosomes to bring translating membrane and secreted proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for proper processing. Additionally, SRP RNA is a member of a family of small nonribosomal RNAs found recently in the nucleolus, suggesting that the nucleolus is more plurifunctional than previously realized. It was therefore of interest to determine whether other SRP components localize to this intranuclear site. In transfected rat fibroblasts, green fluorescent protein fusions of SRP19, SRP68, and SRP72 localized to the nucleolus, as well as to the cytoplasm, as expected. SRP68 also accumulated in the ER, consistent with its affinity for the ER-bound SRP receptor. SRP54 was detected in the cytoplasm as a green fluorescent protein fusion and in immunofluorescence studies, but was not detected in the nucleolus. In situ hybridization experiments also revealed endogenous SRP RNA in the nucleolus. These results demonstrate that SRP RNA and three SRP proteins visit the nucleolus, suggesting that partial SRP assembly, or another unidentified activity of the SRP components, occurs at the nucleolus. SRP54 apparently interacts with nascent SRP beyond the nucleolus, consistent with in vitro reconstitution experiments showing that SRP19 must bind to SRP RNA before SRP54 binds. Our findings support the notion that the nucleolus is the site of assembly and/or interaction between the family of ribonucleoproteins involved in protein synthesis, in addition to ribosomes themselves.

Post-transcriptional adenylation of signal recognition particle RNA is carried out by an enzyme different from mRNA Poly(A) polymerase

A fraction of the signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA from human, rat, Xenopus, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells contains a single post-transcriptionally added adenylic acid residue on its 3'-end; in the case of human SRP RNA, over 60% of the SRP RNA molecules contain a nontemplated adenylic acid residue on their 3'-ends (Sinha, K. M., Gu, J., Chen, Y., and Reddy, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6853-6859). In this study, we investigated the enzyme that is involved in this 3'-end adenylation of SRP RNA. A U1A protein peptide conjugated to albumin completely inhibited the polyadenylation of a SV40 mRNA by HeLa cell nuclear extract in vitro; however, the 3'-end adenylation of human SRP RNA or Alu RNA, which corresponds to 5' and 3'-ends of SRP RNA, was not affected by this U1A peptide conjugate. SRP RNA from mutant strains of S. cerevisiae with a temperature-sensitive mRNA poly(A) polymerase grown at a restrictive temperature of 37 degrees C also contained a post-transcriptionally added adenylic acid residue just like SRP RNA from wild-type cells and mutant cells grown at permissive temperature of 23 degrees C. In addition, binding of SRP 9/14-kDa protein heterodimer was required for adenylation of Alu RNA in vitro. These lines of evidence, along with other data, show that post-transcriptional adenylation of SRP and Alu RNAs is carried out by a novel enzyme that is distinct from the mRNA poly(A) polymerase, CCA-adding enzyme, and nonspecific terminal transferase.

Distinct export pathway utilized by the hepatitis B virus posttranscriptional regulatory element

The posttranscriptional regulatory element (PRE) of hepatitis B virus is an RNA element important for the export of viral mRNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. The cellular export pathway utilized by the PRE is controversial. We present data showing that PRE-dependent export is blocked by vesicular stomatitis virus matrix protein, an inhibitor of all cellular RNA export other than tRNA export. It is also blocked by a mutated form of Ran-binding protein 1, which blocks export mediated by the human immunodeficiency virus Rev and Rev-response element (RRE) but not export mediated by the simian retrovirus constitutive transport element (CTE). On the other hand, PRE-dependent export is not blocked by either TAgRex or leptomycin B, two agents that prevent Rev/RRE-mediated export. Therefore, PRE appears to utilize an export pathway different from that of Rev/RRE or CTE.

Growth inhibition by a triple ribozyme targeted to repetitive B2 transcripts

The B2 family represents a group of short repetitive sequences that are found throughout the rodent genome and are analogous to the human Alu sequences. Certain B2 subfamilies are transcribed by RNA polymerase III (pol III), and this transcription is in part controlled by the retinoblastoma protein. In addition to their putative role in retrotranspositional events, these actively transcribed B2 RNAs show a predicted highly stable secondary structure. Although B2 transcripts are normally confined to the nucleus, they demonstrate altered compartmentation after carcinogen treatment, in cancers, and in immortalized and/or transformed cell lines, the significance of which is unclear. Because modulation of B2 transcripts did not seem feasible with an antisense approach, we designed a triple ribozyme (TRz) construct to down-regulate B2 transcripts. The B2-targeted TRz undergoes efficient self-cleavage, resulting in liberation of the internal hammerhead Rz, which we targeted to a single-stranded region of the consensus B2 sequence. The liberated internal targeted Rz was 20 times more active than the corresponding double-G mutant construct that could not undergo self-cleavage, and 5 times more active than the same Rz flanked by nonspecific vector sequences. The B2-targeted TRz was used to develop stable transfectant clones from an SV40-immortalized hepatocyte cell line. These transfectant clones all showed variably reduced growth rates, accompanied by significant reductions in both cytoplasmic and nuclear B2 RNA levels: linear regression analyses showed that their growth rates were directly related to residual cytoplasmic B2 levels. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses documented efficient self-liberation of the internal targeted Rz in vivo, and showed that the relative cytoplasmic expression levels generally paralleled the magnitude of the decrease in B2 transcripts. The RT-PCR analyses further demonstrated that up to 20% of the Rz was located in the nucleus, which presumably reflects competition between autocatalytic processing and nucleocytoplasmic transport of the initial TRz transcript.

Accurate 3' end processing and adenylation of human signal recognition particle RNA and alu RNA in vitro

Human signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA is transcribed by RNA polymerase III and terminates with -GUCUCUUUUOH on its 3' end. Our previous studies showed that the three terminal uridylic acid residues of human SRP RNA are post-transcriptionally removed and a single adenylic acid residue is added, resulting in a 3' end sequence of -GUCUCUAOH (Sinha, K. M., Gu, J., Chen, Y., and Reddy, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6853-6859). In this study we show that the Alu RNA, corresponding to the 5' and 3' ends of SRP RNA, is also accurately processed and adenylated in vitro. Alu RNAs containing 7 or 11 additional nucleotides on the 3' end were accurately processed and then adenylated. Deletion analysis showed that an 87-nucleotide-long motif comprising of the 5' and 3' ends, including stem IV of the Alu RNA, is sufficient and necessary for the 3' end processing and adenylation. A 73-nucleotide-long construct with deletion of stem IV, required for the binding of SRP 9/14-kDa proteins, was neither processed nor adenylated. The adenylated Alu RNA as well as adenylated SRP RNA were bound to the SRP 9/14-kDa heterodimer and were immunoprecipitated by specific antibodies. A significant fraction of SRP RNA in the nucleoli was found to be processed and adenylated. These data are consistent with nascent SRP and/or Alu RNAs first binding to SRP 9/14-kDa protein heterodimer, followed by the removal of extra sequence on the 3' end and then the addition of one adenylic acid residue in the nucleus, before transport into the cytoplasm.

Localization of signal recognition particle RNA in the nucleolus of mammalian cells

The signal recognition particle (SRP) of eukaryotic cells is a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein machine that arrests the translational elongation of nascent secretory and membrane proteins and facilitates their transport into the endoplasmic reticulum. The spatial pathway of SRP RNA processing and ribonucleoprotein assembly in the cell is not known. In the present investigation, microinjection of fluorescently tagged SRP RNA into the nucleus of mammalian cells was used to examine its intranuclear sites of localization. Microinjection of SRP RNA into the nuclei of normal rat kidney (NRK) epithelial cells maintained at 37 degreesC on the microscope stage resulted in a very rapid initial localization in nucleoli, followed by a progressive decline of nucleolar signal and an increase of fluorescence at discrete sites in the cytoplasm. Nuclear microinjection of a molecule corresponding to a major portion of the Alu domain of SRP RNA revealed a pattern of rapid nucleolar localization followed by cytoplasmic appearance of signal that was similar to the results obtained with full-length SRP RNA. In contrast, a molecule corresponding to the S domain of SRP RNA did not display nucleolar localization to the extent observed with full-length SRP RNA. An SRP RNA molecule lacking helix 6 of the S domain displayed normal nucleolar localization, whereas one lacking helix 8 of the S domain did not. These results, obtained by direct, real-time observation of fluorescent RNA molecules inside the nucleus of living mammalian cells, suggest that the processing of SRP RNA or its ribonucleoprotein assembly into the SRP involves a nucleolar phase.

Alu sequences

Alu sequences are frequently encountered during study of human genomic nucleic acid and form a major component of repetitive DNA. This review describes the origin of Alu sequences and their subsequent amplification and evolution into distinct subfamilies. In recent years a number of different functional roles for Alu sequences have been described. The multiple influences of Alu sequences on RNA polymerase II-mediated gene expression and the presence of Alu sequences in RNA polymerase III-generated transcripts are discussed.

Intracellular structure and nucleocytoplasmic transport

Intracellular movement of any solute or particle accords with one of two general schemes: either it takes place predominantly in the solution phase or it occurs by dynamic interactions with solid-state structures. If nucleocytoplasmic exchanges of macromolecules and complexes are predominantly solution-phase processes, i.e., if the former ("diffusionist") perspective applies, then the only significant structures in nucleocytoplasmic transport are the pore complexes. However, if such exchanges accord with the latter ("solid-state") perspective, then the roles of the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton in nucleocytoplasmic transport are potentially, at least, as important as that of the pore complexes. The role of the nucleoskeleton in mRNA transport is more difficult to evaluate than that of the cytoskeleton because it is less well characterized, and current evidence does not exclude either perspective. However, the balance of evidence favors a solid-state scheme. It is argued that ribosomal subunits are also more likely to migrate by a solid-state rather than a diffusionist mechanism, though the opposite is true of proteins and tRNAs. Moreover, recent data on the effects of viral proteins on intranuclear RNA processing and migration accord with the solid-state perspective. In view of this balance of evidence, three possible solid-state mechanisms for nucleocytoplasmic mRNA transport are described and evaluated. The explanatory advantage of solid-state models is contrasted with the heuristic advantage of diffusion theory, but it is argued that diffusion theory itself, even aided by modern computational techniques and numerical and graphical approaches, cannot account for data describing the movements of materials within the cell. Therefore, the mechanisms envisaged in a diffusionist perspective cannot be confined to diffusion alone, but must include other processes such as bulk fluid flow.

Nucleocytoplasmic transport: factors and mechanisms

In the past two years, our knowledge concerning the mechanisms of nucleocytoplasmic transport through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) has considerably expanded. The application of in vitro systems that reconstitute nuclear protein import has allowed the identification of cytosolic factors that are required for the import process. Microinjection into Xenopus oocytes and yeast genetic systems have provided interesting candidates for RNA export mediators. Functional and structural analysis of nucleoporins has demonstrated the involvement of NPC components in the transport process. Finally, new concepts have emerged such as the integration of the mechanisms of the nuclear protein import and RNA export reactions and the assembly of the transport machinery at specialised domains of the NPC.

Reverse transcriptase: mediator of genomic plasticity

Reverse transcription has been an important mediator of genomic change. This influence dates back more than three billion years, when the RNA genome was converted into the DNA genome. While the current cellular role(s) of reverse transcriptase are not yet completely understood, it has become clear over the last few years that this enzyme is still responsible for generating significant genomic change and that its activities are one of the driving forces of evolution. Reverse transcriptase generates, for example, extra gene copies (retrogenes), using as a template mature messenger RNAs. Such retrogenes do not always end up as nonfunctional pseudogenes but form, after reinsertion into the genome, new unions with resident promoter elements that may alter the gene's temporal and/or spatial expression levels. More frequently, reverse transcriptase produces copies of nonmessenger RNAs, such as small nuclear or cytoplasmic RNAs. Extremely high copy numbers can be generated by this process. The resulting reinserted DNA copies are therefore referred to as short interspersed repetitive elements (SINEs). SINEs have long been considered selfish DNA, littering the genome via exponential propagation but not contributing to the host's fitness. Many SINEs, however, can give rise to novel genes encoding small RNAs, and are the migrant carriers of numerous control elements and sequence motifs that can equip resident genes with novel regulatory elements [Brosius J. and Gould S.J., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89, 10706-10710, 1992]. Retrosequences, such as SINEs and portions of retroelements (e.g., long terminal repeats, LTRs), are capable of donating sequence motifs for nucleosome positioning, DNA methylation, transcriptional enhancers and silencers, poly(A) addition sequences, determinants of RNA stability or transport, splice sites, and even amino acid codons for incorporation into open reading frames as novel protein domains. Retroposition can therefore be considered as a major pacemaker for evolution (including speciation). Retroposons, with their unique properties and actions, form the molecular basis of important evolutionary concepts, such as exaptation [Gould S.J. and Vrba E., Paleobiology 8, 4-15, 1982] and punctuated equilibrium [Elredge N. and Gould S.J. in Schopf T.J.M. (ed). Models in Paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco, 1972, pp. 82-115].

Signal recognition particle (SRP), a ubiquitous initiator of protein translocation

In higher eukaryotes, most secretory and membrane proteins are synthesised by ribosomes which are attached to the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER). This allows the proteins to be translocated across that membrane already during their synthesis. The ribosomes are directed to the RER membrane by a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particle, the signal recognition particle (SRP). SRP fulfills its task by virtue of three distinguishable activities: the binding of a signal sequence which, being part of the nascent polypeptide to be translocated, is exposed on the surface of a translating ribosome; the retardation of any further elongation; and the SRP-receptor-mediated binding of the complex of ribosome, nascent polypeptide and SRP to the RER membrane which results in the detachment of SRP from the signal sequence and the ribosome and the insertion of the nascent polypeptide into the membrane. Evidence is accumulating that SRP is not restricted to eukaryotes: SRP-related particles and SRP-receptor-related molecules are found ubiquitously and may function in protein translocation in every living organism. This review focuses on the mammalian SRP. A brief discussion of its overall structure is followed by a detailed description of the structures of its RNA and protein constituents and the requirements for their assembly into the particle. Homologues of SRP components from organisms other than mammals are mentioned to emphasize the components' conserved or less conserved features. Subsequently, the functions of each of the SRP constituents are discussed. This sets the stage for a presentation of a model for the mechanism by which SRP cyclically assembles and disassembles with translating ribosomes and the RER membrane. It may be expected that similar mechanisms are used by SRP homologues in organisms other than mammals. However, the mammalian SRP-mediated translocation mechanism may not be conserved in its entirety in organisms like Escherichia coli whose SRP lack components required for the function of the mammalian SRP. Possible translocation pathways involving the rudimentary SRP are discussed in view of the existence of alternative, chaperone-mediated translocation pathways with which they may intersect. The concluding two sections deal with open questions in two areas of SRP research. One formulates basic questions regarding the little-investigated biogenesis of SRP. The other gives an outlook over the insights into the mechanisms of each of the known activities of the SRP that are to be expected in the short and medium-term future.

Nuclear export pathways of tRNA and 40 S ribosomes include both common and specific intermediates

Different classes of RNAs are exported from Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei by facilitated pathways. We have performed kinetic competition analyses to investigate the relationship between the export pathways of microinjected tRNA and ribosomal subunits. Saturating concentrations of ribosomal subunits do not compete tRNA export. Thus, the saturable factor in the ribosomal subunit export pathway is not limiting for tRNA export. The co-microinjection of ribosomal subunits did, however, stimulate the rate of tRNA export. Co-injected mRNA also stimulated tRNA export. tRNA export itself displays positive cooperative export kinetics that are abrogated by saturating concentrations of rRNA. These results are consistent with the existence of common high affinity RNA-binding sites that can be titrated with tRNA, rRNA or ribosomal subunits, and mRNA. Furthermore, high concentrations of tRNA are also shown to have moderate inhibitory effects on 40 S subunit export, indicating a lower affinity common intermediate also shared by mRNA.

Direct interaction of nucleoporin p62 with mRNA during its export from the nucleus

Primary transcripts in eukaryotic cells undergo several processing steps within the nucleus, and resulting mature RNA molecules are selectively exported to the cytoplasm. Nucleo-cytoplasmic mRNA transport is an active process that likely involves RNA-protein interactions. To identify specific RNA-binding proteins, we designed a novel approach, which allows the analysis of interactions between mRNAs and proteins along the transport pathway. The method consists of inducing in vivo a covalent binding between nuclear proteins and microinjected mRNAs. Using such a procedure, we were able to detect a direct interaction between nucleoporin p62 with mRNA during export. The formation of the mRNA-p62 complex was inhibited by wheat-germ agglutinin, an inhibitor of mRNA export. Antibodies directed against p62 caused a substantial reduction in the rate of mRNA export from the nucleus.