Contraction of atrial smooth muscle reduces cardiac output in perfused turtle hearts

No evidence for pericardial restraint in the snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) following pharmacologically-induced bradycardia at rest or during exercise

Most animals elevate cardiac output during exercise through a rise in heart rate (f_H), whilst stroke volume (V_S) remains relatively unchanged. Cardiac pacing reveals that elevating f_H alone does not alter cardiac output, which is instead largely regulated by the peripheral vasculature. In terms of myocardial oxygen demand, an increase in f_H is more costly than that which would incur if V_S instead were to increase. We hypothesized that f_H must increase because any substantial rise in V_S would be constrained by the pericardium. To investigate this hypothesis, we explored the effects of pharmacologically-induced bradycardia, with ivabradine treatment, on V_S at rest and during exercise in the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) with intact or opened pericardium. We first showed that, in isolated myocardial preparations, ivabradine exerted a pronounced positive inotropic effect on atrial tissue, but only minor effects on ventricle. Ivabradine reduced f_H in vivo, such that exercise tachycardia was attenuated. Pulmonary and systemic V_S rose in response to ivabradine. The rise in pulmonary V_S largely compensated for the bradycardia at rest, leaving total pulmonary flow unchanged by ivabradine, although ivabradine reduced pulmonary blood flow during swimming (exercise x ivabradine interaction, P<0.05). Although systemic V_S increased, systemic blood flow was reduced by ivabradine both at rest and during exercise, in spite of ivabradine's potential to increase cardiac contractility. Opening the pericardium had no effect on f_H, V_S or blood flows before or after ivabradine, indicating that the pericardium does not constrain V_S in turtles, even during pharmacologically-induced bradycardia.

What determines systemic blood flow in vertebrates?

In the 1950s, Arthur C. Guyton removed the heart from its pedestal in cardiovascular physiology by arguing that cardiac output is primarily regulated by the peripheral vasculature. This is counterintuitive, as modulating heart rate would appear to be the most obvious means of regulating cardiac output. In this Review, we visit recent and classic advances in comparative physiology in light of this concept. Although most vertebrates increase heart rate when oxygen demands rise (e.g. during activity or warming), experimental evidence suggests that this tachycardia is neither necessary nor sufficient to drive a change in cardiac output (i.e. systemic blood flow, Q̇ _sys) under most circumstances. Instead, Q̇ _sys is determined by the interplay between vascular conductance (resistance) and capacitance (which is mainly determined by the venous circulation), with a limited and variable contribution from heart function (myocardial inotropy). This pattern prevails across vertebrates; however, we also highlight the unique adaptations that have evolved in certain vertebrate groups to regulate venous return during diving bradycardia (i.e. inferior caval sphincters in diving mammals and atrial smooth muscle in turtles). Going forward, future investigation of cardiovascular responses to altered metabolic rate should pay equal consideration to the factors influencing venous return and cardiac filling as to the factors dictating cardiac function and heart rate.

Smooth Muscle in Cardiac Chambers is Common in Turtles and Extensive in the Emydid Turtle, Trachemys scripta

A prominent layer of smooth muscle lining the luminal side of the atria of freshwater turtles (Emydidae) was described more than a century ago. We recently demonstrated that this smooth muscle provides a previously unrecognized mechanism to change cardiac output in the emydid red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta) that possibly contributes to their tremendous diving capacity. The purpose of the present immunohistochemical study was firstly to screen major groups of vertebrates for the presence of cardiac smooth muscle. Secondly, we investigated the phylogenetic distribution of cardiac smooth muscle within the turtle order (Testudines), including terrestrial and aquatic species. Atrial smooth muscle was not detected in a range of vertebrates, including Xenopus laevis, Alligator mississippiensis, and Caiman crocodilus, all of which have pronounced diving capacities. However, we confirmed earlier reports that traces of smooth muscle are found in human atrial tissue. Only within the turtles (eight species) was there substantial amounts of nonvascular smooth muscle in the heart. This amount was greatest in the atria, while the amount in proportion to cardiac muscle was greater in the sinus venosus than in other chambers. T. scripta had more smooth muscle in the sinus venosus and atria than the other turtles. In some specimens, there was some smooth muscle in the ventricle and the pulmonary vein. Our study demonstrates that cardiac smooth muscle likely appeared early in turtle evolution and has become extensive within the Emydidae family, possibly in association with diving. Across other tetrapod clades, cardiac smooth muscle might not associate with diving. Anat Rec, 303:1327-1336, 2020. © 2019 The Authors. The Anatomical Record published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association for Anatomy.