Sentinel lymph node mapping for thick (>or=4-mm) melanoma: should we be doing it?

Prognostic Significance of Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Thick Primary Melanomas (> 4 mm)

BACKGROUND

The key prognostic factors for staging patients with primary cutaneous melanoma are Breslow thickness, ulceration, and sentinel lymph node (SLN) status. The multicenter selective lymphadenectomy trial (MSLT-I) verified SLN status as the most important prognostic factor for patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma (Breslow thickness, 1-4 mm). Although most international guidelines recommend SLN biopsy (SLNB) also for patients with thick (> 4 mm, pT4) melanomas, its prognostic role has been questioned. The primary aim of this study was to establish whether SLN status is prognostic in T4 melanoma tumors.

METHODS

Data for all patients with a diagnosis of primary invasive cutaneous melanoma of Breslow thickness greater than 1 mm in Sweden between 2007 and 2020 were retrieved from the Swedish Melanoma Registry, a large prospective population-based registry. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model for melanoma-specific survival (MSS) was constructed based on Breslow thickness stratified for SLN status.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 10,491 patients, 1943 of whom had a Breslow thickness greater than 4 mm (pT4). A positive SLN was found for 34% of these pT4 patients. The 5-year MSS was 71%, and the 10-year MSS was 62%. There was a statistically significant difference in MSS between the patients with a positive SLN and those with a negative SLN (hazard ratio of 2.4 (95% confidence interval CI 1.6-3.5) for stage T4a and 2.0 (95% CI 1.6-2.5) for satage T4b.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node status gives important prognostic information also for patients with thick (> 4 mm) melanomas, and the authors thus recommend that clinical guidelines be updated to reflect this.

Practice Patterns and Prognostic Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Thick Melanoma: A National Cancer Database Study

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been somewhat controversial for patients with a diagnosis of thick (> 4 mm) melanoma. This study aimed to characterize the national practice pattern in performing SLNB for this patient population and to determine the predictors and prognostic value of nodal positivity using population-level data.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of clinically node-negative, thick melanoma (2010-2015) were identified using the National Cancer Database. Factors associated with performing regional nodal evaluation were characterized. Predictors of nodal positivity were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

Of 9847 study patients, 7513 (76.3%) underwent SLNB. The patients who underwent nodal evaluation were younger (median age, 66 vs 81 years; P < 0.001), less likely to have comorbid conditions (19.6% vs 26.0%; P < 0.001), more often privately insured (40.4% vs 16.4%; P < 0.001), and more frequently treated at an academic center (49.5% vs 43.9%; P < 0.001). Among those who underwent nodal evaluation, 25.5% had metastatic nodes. Multivariable regression identified age, Charlson-Deyo score, primary location, ulceration, mitoses, vertical growth phase, and lymphovascular invasion as independent predictors of nodal positivity, but with only moderate predictive accuracy (optimism-adjusted area under the curve, 0.684). Furthermore, compared with node negativity, node positivity was significantly associated with decreased OS (hazard ratio, 2.05; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although nodal status provides important prognostic information, at a national level, nearly one fourth of patients with clinically node-negative, thick melanoma do not undergo SLNB. Appropriate pathologic staging would allow these high-risk patients to be candidates for effective adjuvant therapy.

Disparities in the Presentation and Management of Cutaneous Melanoma That Required Admission

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to examine the association of demographic and socioeconomic factors with cutaneous melanoma that required admission.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, 2003-2009, was merged with County Health Rankings Data.

RESULTS

A total of 2,765 discharge -records were included. Men were more likely to have melanoma in the head, neck, and trunk regions (p < 0.001), while extremities melanoma was more common in women (p < 0.001). Males had a higher risk of lymph node metastasis on presentation (OR 1.54, 95% CI [1.27-1.89]). Blacks and Hispanics were more likely to present with extremities melanoma. Patients with low annual income were more likely to be treated by low-volume surgeons and in hospitals located in high-risk communities (p < 0.05 each). Patients with Medicaid coverage were twice as likely to present with distant metastasis and were more likely to be managed by low-volume surgeons (p < 0.05 each).

CONCLUSIONS

The presentation and outcomes of cutaneous melanoma have a distinct pattern of distribution based on patients' characteristics.

Sentinel Lymph Node Status is a Main Prognostic Parameter Needful for the Correct Staging of Patients with Melanoma Thicker than 4 mm: Single-Institution Experience and Literature Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The usefulness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thick melanomas is debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in T4 melanoma patients and to verify whether this was a homogeneous group of patients with similar poor behavior.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed. Data were extracted from the Tuscan Regional Referral Center database. The outcome of sentinel lymph node-negative and sentinel lymph node-positive T4 melanomas were compared. A systematic review of published series on this issue and a meta-analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Among 125 T4 melanoma patients, 53 patients (42.4%) were sentinel lymph node-positive and 72 (57.6%) patients were sentinel lymph node-negative. The 5-year and the 10-year melanoma specific survival were 81.9% and 72.3% for sentinel lymph node-negative patients and 42.4% and 17.9% (P < 0.001) for sentinel lymph node-positive patients. A positive sentinel lymph node showed an HR of 3.08. The meta-analysis confirmed that there was a significantly greater risk of death for patients with thick melanoma and positive sentinel lymph node (RR 1.75).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study point out that the sentinel lymph node biopsy is required for the correct staging of patients with melanoma thicker than 4 mm and that the status of sentinel lymph node is a significant predictor of melanoma specific survival. This knowledge allows early surgical and adjuvant treatment as well as appropriate trial enrollment and tailored follow-up.

Thin Melanoma with Nodal Involvement: Analysis of Demographic, Pathologic, and Treatment Factors with Regard to Prognosis

BACKGROUND

Although only a small proportion of thin melanomas result in lymph node metastasis, the abundance of these lesions results in a relatively large absolute number of patients with a diagnosis of nodal metastases, determined by either sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy or clinical nodal recurrence (CNR).

METHODS

Independent cohorts with thin melanoma and either SLN metastasis or CNR were identified at two melanoma referral centers. At both centers, SLN metastasis patients were included. At center 1, the CNR cohort included patients with initial negative clinical nodal evaluation followed by CNR. At center 2, the CNR cohort was restricted to those presenting in the era before the use of SLN biopsy. Uni- and multivariable analyses of melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were performed.

RESULTS

At center 1, 427 CNR patients were compared with 91 SLN+ patients. The 5- and 10-year survival rates in the SLN group were respectively 88 and 84 % compared with 72 and 49 % in the CNR group (p < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis showed age older than 50 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.2-1.9), present ulceration (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-2.9), unknown ulceration (HR 1.6; 95 % CI 1.3-2.1), truncal site (HR 1.6; 95 % CI 1.2-2.2), and CNR (HR 3.3; 95 % CI 1.8-6.0) to be associated significantly with decreased MSS (p < 0.01 for each). The center 2 cohort demonstrated remarkably similar findings, with a 5-year MSS of 88 % in the SLN (n = 29) group and 76 % in the CNR group (n = 39, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

Patients with nodal metastases from thin melanomas have a substantial risk of melanoma death. This risk is lower among patients whose disease is discovered by SLN biopsy rather than CNR.

Identification of Patients with Intermediate Thickness Melanoma at Low Risk for Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is recommended for all patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas. We sought to identify such patients at low risk of SLN positivity.

METHODS

All patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas (1.01-4 mm) undergoing SLN biopsy at a single institution from 1995-2011 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression determined factors associated with a low risk of SLN positivity. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to stratify groups based on risk of positivity.

RESULTS

Of the 952 study patients, 157 (16.5 %) had a positive SLN. In the multivariate analysis, thickness <1.5 mm (odds ratio [OR] 0.29), age ≥60 (OR 0.69), present tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (OR 0.60), absent lymphovascular invasion (OR 0.46), and absent satellitosis (OR 0.44) were significantly associated with a low risk of SLN positivity. CART analysis identified thickness of 1.5 mm as the primary cut point for risk of SLN metastasis. Patients with a thickness of <1.5 mm represented 36 % of the total cohort and had a SLN positivity rate of 6.6 % (95 % confidence interval 3.8-9.4 %). In patients with melanomas <1.5 mm in thickness, the presence of additional low risk factors identified 257 patients (75 % of patients with <1.5 mm melanomas) in which the rate of SLN positivity was <5 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a SLN positivity rate of 16.5 % overall, substantial heterogeneity of risk exists among patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma. Most patients with melanoma between 1.01 and 1.5 mm have a risk of SLN positivity similar to that in patients with thin melanomas.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Provides Prognostic Value in Thick Head and Neck Melanoma

Objectives

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is standard practice for intermediate-thickness head and neck melanoma (HNM) but remains controversial for melanomas more than 4 mm in thickness. The objectives of this study were to evaluate (1) the diagnostic accuracy and (2) the prognostic value of SLNB in patients with thick HNM.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Large cancer center between June 2000 and December 2012.

Subjects

77 patients undergoing SLNB for T4 HNM without in-transit, regional, or distant metastatic disease at presentation.

Methods

Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors were performed.

Results

77 patients underwent attempted SLNB for T4 HNM without in-transit, regional, or distant metastatic disease at presentation. The mean patient age was 62 years (range, 4-87 years) and there was a male predominance (80%). Mean Breslow thickness was 6.1 mm (range, 4-21 mm). Of the 77 patients undergoing attempted SLNB, 7 had no identifiable sentinel lymph node (9%). For the remaining 91% with 1 or more identifiable sentinel lymph nodes, the mean number of nodes identified was 3.3 (range, 1-13). The sentinel lymph node positivity rate was 24%. A false-negative SLNB occurred in 2 patients (3.8%). With a median follow-up of 36 months, the estimated 5-year disease-free, disease-specific, and overall survival rates were 47%, 74%, and 69%, respectively. A positive sentinel lymph node was significantly linked to shortened disease-free survival (74 vs 36 months, P = .026) and disease-specific survival (121 vs 59 months, P = .035).

Conclusion

SLNB provides accurate staging of the regional node basin and important prognostic information for patients with thick HNM.

Clinical and prognostic factors for melanoma of the skin using SEER registries: collaborative stage data collection system, version 1 and version 2

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this article are to assess the completeness of the data collected on site-specific factors (SSFs) as a part of Collaborative Stage (CS) version 2 and the impact of the transition from the American Joint Committee on Cancer's (AJCC) 6th to 7th edition guidelines on stage distribution.

METHODS

Incidence data for melanomas of the skin from 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries (SEER-18) were analyzed. Percentages of unknown cases for 7 SSFs were examined, along with staging trends from 2004 to 2010 and differences in AJCC 6th and 7th edition stage distributions for 2010 cases.

RESULTS

Fewer than 10% of cases were coded as unknown for SSFs 1 (measured thickness), 2 (ulceration), and 3 (lymph node metastasis). For the remaining SSFs, 36-81% of cases were coded as unknown. Stage distributions were relatively consistent across time and between the AJCC 6th and 7th editions, with the exception of stage IA and stage INOS (not otherwise specified), for which a shift in cases was observed between the AJCC 6th and 7th edition guidelines fOR 2010 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A shift of cases out of stage IA and into stage INOS was observed between the AJCC 6th and 7th edition guidelines for 2010 cases. This was attributed to the high number of cases coded as unknown for SSF7 (primary tumor mitotic count/rate). The percentage of cases coded as unknown varied by SSF. Data completeness presents an issue for SSFs introduced in CS version 2.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thick-Melanoma Patients (N=350): What is Its Prognostic Role?

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is currently recommended for patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas (T2-T3). Historically, T4 melanoma patients have not been considered good candidates for SLNB because of the high risk of distant progression. However, some authors suggest that T4 melanoma patients could be considered as a heterogeneous group that could benefit from SLNB.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 350 patients with thick (>4 mm) melanomas between 1999 and 2011. Patients were stratified into three groups depending on the results of SLNB: (1) 94 SLNB-negative; (2) 84 SLNB-positive; and (3) 172 SLNB not performed (observation group). The associations of clinical-pathologic features with the result of SLNB, disease-free interval (DFI), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses confirmed a better prognosis for SLN-negative patients compared with patients in the observation group (DSS hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, p = 0.03; DFI HR 0.47, p < 0.001). The observation group was shown to have the same prognosis as the positive-sentinel lymph node group, when adjusted for principal confounders in the model.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed that thick-melanoma patients are a heterogeneous group with different prognosis. In our experience, SLNB allowed for an appropriate stratification of patients in different survival groups. On the basis of our results, we strongly recommend the routine execution of SLNB in cases of primary melanoma thicker than 4 mm.

Sentinel node biopsy should not be recommended for patients with thick melanoma

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain whether there is any relationship between the state of the sentinel lymph node histopathology, recurrence and mortality from thick melanoma in patients undergoing SLNB over a long follow-up.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with thick melanoma undergoing SLNB were selected from a prospective database. Lymphoscintigraphy, lymphatic mapping and intraoperative gamma probe detection were performed in all patients. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) was analyzed by HE and immunohistochemistry. Complete lymphadenectomy was indicated for patients with positive sentinel node. The histopathological SLN status was related to the rate of recurrence and mortality from melanoma.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-six SLNs were taken from the 86 patients. Ages ranged from 18 to 73 years. There were 47 women and 39 men. Micrometastases were found in 44 patients. Forty-two patients underwent complete lymphadenectomy. Seven other patients had positive lymph node. Among the 44 patients with positive sentinel node, there were 20 recurrences and 15 deaths. There were 18 recurrences and 12 deaths in the group with negative SLN. The Breslow thickness was not correlated with the histopathological SLN status. The histopathological SLN status did not affect the rates of recurrence and mortality (Fisher test, p = 1.00). The median follow-up was 69 months.

CONCLUSION

Considering the lack of evidence of benefit, SLNB should not be indicated for patients with thick melanoma outside of clinical studies.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: controversies and current guidelines

ABSTRACT: 

Melanoma is a global health problem and the incidence of this disease is rising. While localized melanoma has an excellent prognosis, regional and distant disease is associated with much poorer outcomes. Optimal treatment for clinically localized melanoma requires surgical control of the primary site and accurate staging of the regional nodal basin with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). While further data are required to determine if SLNB is associated with a survival advantage, currently available data supports the use of SLNB for staging of appropriate patients and the procedure may offer benefits beyond staging. This article reviews current data that shapes guidelines regarding patient selection for SLNB in melanoma and highlights areas where performing this procedure remains controversial.

Undertreatment of thick head and neck melanomas: an age-based analysis

PURPOSE

To determine U.S. treatment patterns for pathologic staging practices in patients with thick head and neck melanomas (HNM).

METHODS

Patients with thick HNM without clinical evidence of in-transit, regional, or distant metastatic spread at presentation were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. Treatment trends for patients were summarized, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations between varying practice patterns.

RESULTS

A total of 1,230 patients with HNM meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Surgical staging procedures were utilized in 53.5 %, including both sentinel lymph node biopsy (37 %) and elective neck dissection (16 %). Patients undergoing a surgical staging procedure were younger (64 vs. 77 years, p < 0.001) with smaller tumors (6.3 vs. 6.6 mm, p = 0.008). The rate of occult nodal disease was 22 % in patients undergoing a surgical staging procedure. The presence of a positive regional node in this subgroup of patients was associated with a significant reduction in disease-specific (44 vs. 59 months, p < 0.001) and overall survival (40 vs. 53 months, p < 0.001) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, the presence of a positive node was the most significant factor for reduced overall survival (hazard ratio 2.36, 95 % confidence interval 1.71-3.23) and disease-specific survival (hazard ratio 2.84, 95 % confidence interval 1.99-4.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologic staging procedures provide independent prognostic information for patients with thick HNM. Despite this, current practice patterns demonstrate underutilization, particularly in elderly patients. Further work is needed to address the barriers to pathologic staging implementation in patients with thick HNM.

Sentinel node biopsy in thin and thick melanoma

BACKGROUND

Although sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has become standard of care in patients with melanoma, its use in patients with thin or thick melanomas remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with thin (≤1 mm) or thick (≥4 mm) melanomas who underwent SNB at two Italian centers between 1998 and 2011. The associations of clinicopathologic features with sentinel lymph node positive status and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 492 patients with thin melanoma, sentinel node was positive for metastatic melanoma in 24 (4.9 %) patients. No sentinel node positivity was detected in patients with primary tumor thickness <0.3 mm. Mitotic rate was the only factor significantly associated with sentinel node positivity (p = 0.0001). Five-year OS was 81 % for patients with positive sentinel node and 93 % for negative sentinel node (p = 0.001). In 298 patients with thick melanoma, 39 % of patients had positive sentinel lymph nodes (median Breslow thickness 5 mm). In patients with positive sentinel node, 93 % had mitotic rate >1/mm(2). Five-year OS was 49 % for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes and 56 % for patients with negative sentinel nodes (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of sentinel node positivity in patients with thin melanoma was 4.9 %. The only clinicopathologic factor related to node positivity was mitotic rate. Given its prognostic importance, SNB should be considered in such patients. SNB should also be the standard method for melanoma ≥4 mm, not only for staging, but also for guiding therapeutic decisions.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thick primary cutaneous melanoma: patterns of use and underuse utilizing a population-based model

Background. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for thick cutaneous melanoma is supported by national guidelines. We report on factors associated with the use and underuse of SLNB for thick primary cutaneous melanoma. Methods. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients who underwent surgery for thick primary cutaneous melanoma from 2004 to 2008. We used multivariate logistic regression models to predict use of SLNB. Results. Among 1,981 patients, 833 (41.8%) did not undergo SLNB. Patients with primary melanomas of the arm (OR 2.07, CI 1.56–2.75; P < 0.001), leg (OR 2.40, CI 1.70–3.40; P < 0.001), and trunk (OR 1.82, CI 1.38–2.40; P < 0.001) had an increased likelihood of receiving a SLNB, as did those with desmoplastic histology (OR 1.47, CI 1.11–1.96; P = 0.008). A decreased likelihood of receiving SLNB was noted for advancing age ≥ 60 years (age 60 to 69: OR 0.58, CI 0.33–0.99, P = 0.047; age 70 to 79: OR 0.32, CI 0.19–0.54, P < 0.001; age 80 or more: OR 0.10, CI 0.06–0.16, P < 0.001) and unknown race/ethnicity (OR 0.21, CI 0.07–0.62; P = 0.005). Conclusions. In particular, elderly patients are less likely to receive SLNB. Further research is needed to assess whether use of SLNB in this population is detrimental or beneficial.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology joint clinical practice guideline

PURPOSE

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) sought to provide an evidence-based guideline on the use of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in staging patients with newly diagnosed melanoma.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review of the literature published from January 1990 through August 2011 was completed using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Abstracts from ASCO and SSO annual meetings were included in the evidence review. An Expert Panel was convened to review the evidence and develop guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

Seventy-three studies met full eligibility criteria. The evidence review demonstrated that SLN biopsy is an acceptable method for lymph node staging of most patients with newly diagnosed melanoma.

RECOMMENDATIONS

SLN biopsy is recommended for patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas (Breslow thickness, 1 to 4 mm) of any anatomic site; use of SLN biopsy in this population provides accurate staging. Although there are few studies focusing on patients with thick melanomas (T4; Breslow thickness, > 4 mm), SLN biopsy may be recommended for staging purposes and to facilitate regional disease control. There is insufficient evidence to support routine SLN biopsy for patients with thin melanomas (T1; Breslow thickness, < 1 mm), although it may be considered in selected patients with high-risk features when staging benefits outweigh risks of the procedure. Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is recommended for all patients with a positive SLN biopsy and achieves good regional disease control. Whether CLND after a positive SLN biopsy improves survival is the subject of the ongoing Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II.

Advances in sentinel lymph node mapping for patients with melanoma

Sentinel lymph node mapping allows accurate pathological staging for patients with cutaneous melanoma and clinically normal regional nodes. Early technical advances facilitated its widespread acceptance by surgeons. Morbidity as a result of the procedure is well established, but the potential benefit of providing powerful prognostic information outweighs these risks in most patients with intermediate-risk disease.

Sentinel node biopsy for melanoma: an update after two decades of experience

When detected and treated early, melanoma has an excellent prognosis. Unfortunately, as the tumor invades deeper into tissue the risk of metastatic spread to regional lymph nodes and beyond increases and the prognosis worsens significantly. Therefore, accurately detecting any regional lymphatic metastasis would significantly aid in determining a patient's prognosis and help guide his or her treatment plan. In 1991, Don Morton and colleagues presented new paradigm in diagnosing regional lymphatic involvement of tumors termed sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). By mapping the regional lymph system around a tumor and tracing the lymphatic flow, a determination of the most likely lymph node or nodes the cancer will spread to first is made. Then, a limited biopsy of the most likely nodes is performed rather than a more-invasive removal of the entire local lymphatic chain. In 20 years that have followed, a great deal of information has been gained as to its accuracy, prognostic value, appropriate candidates, and its impact on regional disease control and survival. The SLNB has been shown to accurately stage regional lymph node basins in stage I and II melanoma patients with minimal morbidity. More sensitive histologic techniques are now being applied that may allow even greater accuracy in the staging of melanoma patients. Although specific percent risk thresholds are still in question, recommendation for SLNB when melanomas are 1 mm or thicker has gained wide acceptance. SLNB may also be appropriate for patients with melanomas that are between 0.76 and 1 mm thick and have ulceration, high mitotic rates, or reach a Clark level IV. Therefore, melanomas with IB or greater staging should be considered for SLNB.

Thick primary melanoma has a heterogeneous tumor biology: an institutional series

BACKGROUND

Thick melanomas (TM) ≥4 mm have a high risk for nodal and distant metastases. Optimal surgical management, prognostic significance of sentinel node biopsy (SLNB), and benefits of interferon (IFN) for these patients are unclear. As a continuum of increasing tumor thickness is placed into a single TM group, differences in biologic and clinical behavior may be lost. The purpose of this study was to better characterize the diverse biology in TM, including the value of increasing thickness and nodal status information, potentially identifying high risk TM subgroups that may warrant more aggressive treatment/follow up.

METHODS

155 consecutive TM patients treated at a single institution between 1971 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient, disease and treatment features were analyzed with respect to disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median patient age was 66 years and 68% of patients were men. The trunk was the most common TM location (35%), followed by the head and neck (29%) and lower extremities (20%). Median thickness was 6 mm and 61% were ulcerated. 6% patients had stage IV disease, 12% had clinical nodal metastases. Clinically negative lymph node basins were treated by observation (22 patients--15.4%), elective lymph node dissection (ELND) (24 patients--17.6%) or SLNB (91 patients--67%). 75% of ELND's and 53% of SLNB's were positive. Completion node dissection was performed in 38 SLNB+ patients and 22% had additional positive nodes. 17% of the study patients received IFN. At median follow up of 26 months, 5 year DFS and OS were 42% and 43.6%. For SLNB positive vs negative, median DFS were 22 vs 111 months (p = 0.006) and median OS were 41 vs 111 months (p = 0.006). When stratified by tumor thickness ≤ vs > 6 mm, 5 year DFS was 58.3% vs 20% (p < 0.0001) and OS was 62% vs 20% (P < 0.0001). IFN had no impact on DFS or OS (p = 0.98 and 0.8 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Within the high risk group of patients with TM, cases with tumor thickness > 6 mm or a positive SLNB had a significantly worse DFS and OS (p < .0001, <.0001 and .006, .006).

Sentinel lymph node biopsy and melanoma: 2010 update Part II

This article will discuss the evidence for and against the therapeutic efficacy of early removal of potentially affected lymph nodes, morbidity associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymphadenectomy, current guidelines regarding patient selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy, and the remaining questions that ongoing clinical trials are attempting to answer. The Sunbelt Melanoma Trial and the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trials I and II will be discussed in detail.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

At the completion of this learning activity, participants should be able to discuss the data regarding early surgical removal of lymph nodes and its effect on the overall survival of melanoma patients, be able to discuss the potential benefits and morbidity associated with complete lymph node dissection, and to summarize the ongoing trials aimed at addressing the question of therapeutic value of early surgical treatment of regional lymph nodes that may contain micrometastases.

Is there a benefit to sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with T4 melanoma?

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists as to whether patients with thick (Breslow depth>4 mm), clinically lymph node-negative melanoma require sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. The authors examined the impact of SLN biopsy on prognosis and outcome in this patient population.

METHODS

A review of the authors' institutional review board-approved melanoma database identified 293 patients with T4 melanoma who underwent surgical excision between 1998 and 2007. Patient demographics, histologic features, and outcome were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 227 T4 patients who had an SLN biopsy, 107 (47%) were positive. The strongest predictors of a positive SLN included angiolymphatic invasion, satellitosis, or ulceration of the primary tumor. Patients with a T4 melanoma and a negative SLN had a significantly better 5-year distant disease-free survival (DDFS) (85.3% vs 47.8%; P<.0001) and overall survival (OS) (80% vs 47%; P<.0001) compared with those with metastases to the SLN. For SLN-positive patients, only angiolymphatic invasion was a significant predictor of DDFS, with a hazard ratio of 2.29 (P=.007). Ulceration was not significant when examining SLN-positive patients but the most significant factor among SLN-negative patients, with a hazard ratio of 5.78 (P=.02). Increasing Breslow thickness and mitotic rate were also significantly associated with poorer outcome. Patients without ulceration or SLN metastases had an extremely good prognosis, with a 5-year OS>90% and a 5-year DDFS of 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically lymph node-negative T4 melanoma cases should be strongly considered for SLN biopsy, regardless of Breslow depth. SLN lymph node status is the most significant prognostic sign among these patients. T4 patients with a negative SLN have an excellent prognosis in the absence of ulceration and should not be considered candidates for adjuvant high-dose interferon.

Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification

PURPOSE

To revise the staging system for cutaneous melanoma on the basis of data from an expanded American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Melanoma Staging Database.

METHODS

The melanoma staging recommendations were made on the basis of a multivariate analysis of 30,946 patients with stages I, II, and III melanoma and 7,972 patients with stage IV melanoma to revise and clarify TNM classifications and stage grouping criteria.

RESULTS

Findings and new definitions include the following: (1) in patients with localized melanoma, tumor thickness, mitotic rate (histologically defined as mitoses/mm(2)), and ulceration were the most dominant prognostic factors. (2) Mitotic rate replaces level of invasion as a primary criterion for defining T1b melanomas. (3) Among the 3,307 patients with regional metastases, components that defined the N category were the number of metastatic nodes, tumor burden, and ulceration of the primary melanoma. (4) For staging purposes, all patients with microscopic nodal metastases, regardless of extent of tumor burden, are classified as stage III. Micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry are specifically included. (5) On the basis of a multivariate analysis of patients with distant metastases, the two dominant components in defining the M category continue to be the site of distant metastases (nonvisceral v lung v all other visceral metastatic sites) and an elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level.

CONCLUSION

Using an evidence-based approach, revisions to the AJCC melanoma staging system have been made that reflect our improved understanding of this disease. These revisions will be formally incorporated into the seventh edition (2009) of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and implemented by early 2010.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy from the vantage point of an oncologic surgeon

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has greatly influenced the surgical management of clinically localized primary melanoma. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy have been used for the selective management of the draining regional lymph node basin of primary cutaneous melanoma. Oncologic surgeons have adopted this procedure to selectively identify occult nodal status in melanoma patients who are at a higher risk of regional metastasis. The current standard of treatment of tumor-positive sentinel lymph node metastasis is immediate completion lymphadenectomy, but considerable debate surrounds the utility of this procedure. This contribution reviews development, technical aspects, selective management of the lymph node basin, and sentinel lymph node biopsy techniques.

Multidisciplinary treatment of primary melanoma

This article covers the multidisciplinary treatment of primary melanoma. Excision margins and the need for sentinel lymphadenectomy are mainly dictated by the Breslow thickness although exceptions to this dictum do exist. Interferon is the only FDA approved adjuvant therapy for high risk melanoma although its overall survival benefit is minimal. Trials examining different doses or duration of interferon therapy have not demonstrated any promising survival data so far. There have been several randomized vaccine trials for melanoma but none have shown an overall survival benefit. Research into T-cell regulation continues and will hopefully bring promise for the future of melanoma treatment.

Imaging in cutaneous melanoma

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is a common malignancy and imaging, particularly lymphoscintigraphy (LS), positron-emission tomography with 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET), ultrasound, radiography computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging have important roles in staging and restaging, surgical guidance, surveillance and assessment of recurrent disease. This review aims to summarize the available data regarding these and other imaging modalities in CM and provide the basis for subsequent formulation of guidelines regarding the use of imaging in CM. PubMed and Medline searches were performed and reference lists from publications were also searched. The published data were reviewed and tabulated. There is level I evidence supporting the use of LS and sentinel lymph node biopsy in nodal staging for CM. There is level III evidence demonstrating the superiority of ultrasound to palpation in the assessment of lymph nodes in CM. There is level IV evidence supporting FDG-PET in American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III/IV and recurrent CM and that FDG-PET/CT may be superior to FDG-PET. Level IV evidence also supports the use of CT in the same group of patients and the role of CT appears to be complementary to FDG-PET. Various imaging modalities, especially LS/sentinel lymph node biopsy and FDG-PET/CT, add incremental information in the management of CM and the various modalities have complementary roles depending on the clinical situation.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: aspects of pathologic assessment

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy affords an accurate, minimally invasive means of staging and determining prognosis in patients with melanoma and for identifying those patients who may benefit from complete regional lymph node dissection. Careful and accurate histopathologic assessment of SLNs is critical to achieving optimal reliability of the technique. Micromorphometric parameters of melanoma deposits in SLNs have been shown to be predictive of regional non-SLN involvement and of clinical outcomes. Several non-histopathologic methods of SLN evaluation have been investigated, and while some of them show promise for the future, excision and histopathologic examination currently remains the gold standard for the evaluation of SLNs.

Gender differences in skin: a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

There has been increasing interest in studying gender differences in skin to learn more about disease pathogenesis and to discover more effective treatments. Recent advances have been made in our understanding of these differences in skin histology, physiology, and immunology, and they have implications for diseases such as acne, eczema, alopecia, skin cancer, wound healing, and rheumatologic diseases with skin manifestations.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews advances in our understanding of gender differences in skin.

METHODS

Using the PubMed database, broad searches for topics, with search terms such as gender differences in skin and sex differences in skin, as well as targeted searches for gender differences in specific dermatologic diseases, such as gender differences in melanoma, were performed. Additional articles were identified from cited references. Articles reporting gender differences in the following areas were reviewed: acne, skin cancer, wound healing, immunology, hair/alopecia, histology and skin physiology, disease-specific gender differences, and psychological responses to disease burden.

RESULTS

A recurring theme encountered in many of the articles reviewed referred to a delicate balance between normal and pathogenic conditions. This theme is highlighted by the complex interplay between estrogens and androgens in men and women, and how changes and adaptations with aging affect the disease process. Sex steroids modulate epidermal and dermal thickness as well as immune system function, and changes in these hormonal levels with aging and/or disease processes alter skin surface pH, quality of wound healing, and propensity to develop autoimmune disease, thereby significantly influencing potential for infection and other disease states. Gender differences in alopecia, acne, and skin cancers also distinguish hormonal interactions as a major target for which more research is needed to translate current findings to clinically significant diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

CONCLUSIONS

The published findings on gender differences in skin yielded many advances in our understanding of cancer, immunology, psychology, skin histology, and specific dermatologic diseases. These advances will enable us to learn more about disease pathogenesis, with the goal of offering better treatments. Although gender differences can help us to individually tailor clinical management of disease processes, it is important to remember that a patient's sex should not radically alter diagnostic or therapeutic efforts until clinically significant differences between males and females arise from these findings. Because many of the results reviewed did not originate from randomized controlled clinical trials, it is difficult to generalize the data to the general population. However, the pressing need for additional research in these areas becomes exceedingly clear, and there is already a strong foundation on which to base future investigations.

The evolution of the management of regional lymph nodes in melanoma

The last two decades have seen sweeping changes in the surgical approach to melanoma. Traditionally, patients without evidence of nodal metastases were considered for elective lymph node dissection. This approach placed many patients at risk of morbidity while many derived no benefit. As investigators gained a deeper understanding of melanoma and lymphatic biology, newer methods of managing regional lymph nodes were sought. The advent of sentinel node biopsy has radically changed the approach to melanoma.

Malignant melanoma in the 21st century, part 2: staging, prognosis, and treatment

Critical to the clinical management of a patient with malignant melanoma is an understanding of its natural history. As with most malignant disorders, prognosis is highly dependent on the clinical stage (extent of tumor burden) at the time of diagnosis. The patient's clinical stage at diagnosis dictates selection of therapy. We review the state of the art in melanoma staging, prognosis, and therapy. Substantial progress has been made in this regard during the past 2 decades. This progress is primarily reflected in the development of sentinel lymph node biopsies as a means of reducing the morbidity associated with regional lymph node dissection, increased understanding of the role of neoangiogenesis in the natural history of melanoma and its potential as a treatment target, and emergence of innovative multimodal therapeutic strategies, resulting in significant objective response rates in a disease commonly believed to be drug resistant. Although much work remains to be done to improve the survival of patients with melanoma, clinically meaningful results seem within reach.