Sentinel Node Biopsy Provides More Accurate Staging Than Elective Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma

Sentinel lymph node metastasis in primary cutaneous basosquamous carcinoma. A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Basosquamous carcinoma (BSC) is a rare, biologically aggressive tumor. This cross-sectional study aims to define risk factors for subclinical nodal metastasis in primary BSC, and identify the patients who would benefit from routine sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) as part of the initial management.

METHODS

A total of 142 patients, with histologically proven BSC without palpable lymph nodes, underwent SLNB after the initial excision. Clinicopathological features and demographics were analyzed between the patients with detected micrometastasis (SLNM) and those with negative SLN.

RESULTS

In 7.7% patients, subcapsular and <0.1 mm SLNM were found. The frequency of SLNM was 0.9%, 11.8%, and 80.0% in patients with maximum lesion diameter ≤ 2 cm, 2.1-3.0 cm and >3.0 cm, respectively (P < 0.001) and was strongly associated with perineural (P < 0.001; OR = 26.46, 95% CI = 5.62-124.52) and lymphatic invasion (P < 0.001; OR = 17.35, 95% CI = 4.44-67.91). Within 18-84 months, no recurrence or metastasis were observed in SLNM positive patients. False negative SLNB rate of 15.4% was recorded.

CONCLUSION

Cutaneous BSC is associated with early nodal metastatic potential. Tumor size >2 cm, lymphatic and perineural invasion are significant determinants for SLN micrometastasis. In the absence of palpable lymphadenopathy, wide resection and SLNB with long-term follow-up are highly recommended in these patients.

Surgical management of tumor-positive interval node in melanoma patients: An observational study

The presence of interval nodes (IN) in melanoma is testified in several studies and sometimes these lymph nodes can contain metastatic disease. Currently there are no guidelines about the management of patients with tumor-positive INs.We enrolled all patients affected by melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in a single institution. All patients with tumor-positive IN underwent the lymphadenectomy of the subsequent draining lymphatic field. Prognosis of IN+-patients was compared with subjects with positive SLNB in usual field through Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analysis.Overall 596 subjects underwent lymphoscintigraphy and one or more INs were identified in 94 (15.8%) patients. The mean number of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) identified per patient was significantly higher in patients with INs. Macrometastasis were more common in patients with INs. Matched pair analysis testified a statistically significant better prognosis in patients with positive-INs when compared with patients with positive SNs in usual side with the same demographic and clinical characteristics. These findings were confirmed both in analysis of 10-year recurrence-free period, then in 10-years overall survival analysis.Lymphadenectomy of the lymphatic draining field beyond positive-IN testify has proved to be a safe procedure that may improve prognosis in melanoma patients with tumor-positive INs. The better prognosis of patients with tumor-positive INs undergoing lymphadenectomy may be justified by the earlier treatment of lymphatic metastases. Further multicentric comparative studies are needed to evaluate possible impact of this procedure on prognosis of melanoma patients.

Fatty Acid Synthase and Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase Are Expressed in Nodal Metastatic Melanoma But Not in Benign Intracapsular Nodal Nevi

BACKGROUND

Melanoma is a potentially lethal form of skin cancer for which the current standard therapy is complete surgical removal of the primary tumor followed by sentinel lymph node biopsy when indicated. Histologic identification of metastatic melanoma in a sentinel node has significant prognostic and therapeutic implications, routinely guiding further surgical management with regional lymphadenectomy. While melanocytes in a lymph node can be identified by routine histopathologic and immunohistochemical examination, the distinction between nodal nevus cells and melanoma can be morphologically problematic. Previous studies have shown that malignant melanoma can over-express metabolic genes such as fatty acid synthase (FASN) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC). This immunohistochemical study aims to compare the utility of FASN and ACC in differentiating sentinel lymph nodes with metastatic melanomas from those with benign nodal nevi in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using antibodies against FASN and ACC, 13 sentinel lymph nodes from 13 patients with metastatic melanoma and 14 lymph nodes harboring benign intracapsular nevi from 14 patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma were examined. A diagnosis of nodal melanoma was based on cytologic atypia and histologic comparison with the primary melanoma. All nodal nevi were intracapsular and not trabecular. Immunohistochemistry for Melan-A, S100, human melanoma black 45 (HMB45), FASN, and ACC were performed. The percentage of melanocytes staining with HMB45, FASN, and ACC was determined and graded in 25% increments; staining intensity was graded as weak, moderate, or strong.

RESULTS

All metastatic melanomas tested had at least 25% tumor cell staining for both FASN and ACC. Greater than 75% of the tumor cells stained with FAS in 7/13 cases and for ACC in 5/12 cases. Intensity of staining was variable; strong staining for FASN and ACC was observed in 69% and 50% of metastatic melanoma, respectively. HMB45 was negative in 40% of nodal melanoma cases all of which stained with FASN and ACC. Capsular nevi were uniformly negative for FASN, ACC, and HMB45 immunoreactivity.

CONCLUSIONS

All metastatic melanoma cases involving sentinel lymph nodes were positive for FASN and ACC while no staining was observed in intracapsular nevi. These findings suggest that FASN and ACC could be used as valuable ancillary stains in the distinction between nodal nevi and metastatic melanoma.

Surgical Management and Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk and Metastatic Melanoma

Wide local excision is considered routine therapy after initial diagnosis of primary melanoma to reduce local recurrences, but it does not impact survival. Sentinel node staging is recommended for melanomas of intermediate thickness, but it has also not demonstrated any indisputable therapeutic effect on survival. The prognostic value of sentinel node staging has been long established and is therefore considered routine, especially in light of the eligibility criteria for adjuvant therapy (trials). Whether completion lymph node dissection after a positive sentinel node biopsy improves survival is the question of current trials. The MSLT-2 study is best powered to show a potential benefit, but it has not yet reported any data. Another study, the German DECOG study, presented at the 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting did not show any benefit but is criticized for the underpowered design and insufficient follow-up. There is no consensus on the use of adjuvant interferon in melanoma. This topic has been the focus of many studies with different regimens (low-, intermediate-, or high-dose and/or short- or long-term treatment). Adjuvant interferon has been shown to improve relapse-free survival but failed to improve overall survival. More recently, adjuvant ipilimumab has also demonstrated an improved relapse-free survival. Overall survival data have not yet been reported due to insufficient follow-up. Currently, studies are ongoing to analyze the use of adjuvant anti-PD-1 and molecular targeted therapies (vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and trametinib). In the absence of unambiguously positive approved agents, clinical trial participation remains a priority. This could change in the near future.

Real-time lymphography by indocyanine green fluorescence: improved navigation for regional lymph node staging

OBJECTIVES

Lymphatic imaging is an important step for the identification of lymphonodal positive disease in solid malignancies. Various methods have been established to detect positive lymph nodes, but the available diagnostic tools leave some inherent drawbacks. The aim of this study was to validate the indocyanine green (ICG) guided approach for transcutaneous and transmesenterial navigation with accurate lymph vessel and node identification for regional lymph node staging in solid malignancies.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, a planar fluorescence imaging system was applied for lymphography and lymph node detection using ICG. A total of 96 patients were recruited and subject to fluorescence navigation for axillary (n = 46), inguinal (n = 16), and mesenterial (n = 34) visualization to analyze technical and clinical feasibility of the method after regional lymph node dissection and the applicability.

RESULTS

Overall fluorescence imaging identified lymphatic vessels and the SLN in 92 out of 96 patients (detection rate: 96%) after a mean injection of 7 mg ICG. Sensitivity based on fluorescent emission of ICG navigation was 95.6% in 65 out of 68 patients with lymph node dissection. All solid tumors were feasible for fluorescence-guided navigation with a broad spectrum.

CONCLUSION

Fluorescence-guided real-time lymphography with navigation to regional lymph nodes enables accurate visualization for a broad spectrum of different solid tumors with potential lymphonodal spread. In addition, the technique can be applied for lymphography in non-malignant diseases. With reference to the broad application spectrum, institutional investment in camera equipment can be justified.

Evaluation of the benefit of using blue dye in addition to indocyanine green fluorescence for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

Background

Near infrared-guided indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence has vast potential for guiding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate any additional clinical benefit for SLNB when blue dye is used in combination with ICG.

Methods

Between November of 2009 and September of 2013, 86 patients diagnosed with breast cancer were investigated by SLNB using a combination of patent blue and ICG. A lymph node was considered as the sentinel lymph node (SLN) when it was stained with blue dye and/or fluorescence. A levelIandIIaxillary dissection was performed for verification of axillary node status after the SLNB.

Results

The SLN identification rate of SLN for ICG-patent blue combination was comparable to that for ICG alone (98.8% versus 93%; P = 0.054), but the false-negative rate was reduced from 12% (3/25) to 4% (1/25). Twenty-four patients had positive SLNs. In two of those patients, although there were SLNs identified by both tracers, the positive SLNs were identified by blue dye only.

Conclusion

Although blue dye did not improve the identification rate significantly, there was a definite benefit in improving the false-negative rate. The use of a fluorescence method together with blue dye is an ideal method for hospitals that do not have access to conventional radiation-based detection methods.

Use of Fluorescence Imaging in Combination with Patent Blue Dye versus Patent Blue Dye Alone in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) has the potential to improve sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in breast cancer. In this clinical trial, we compared the potential value of ICG combined with blue dye with that of blue dye alone for detecting SLNs.

METHODS

Patients undergoing SLN biopsy (SLNB) between November 2010 and November 2013 were included. Up to December 2011, SLNs were detected by using patent blue (PB) alone, and since January 2012, by using PB in combination with ICG. The patients were divided into the following two groups: group A (ICG-PB; n=96) and group B (PB; n=73), and SLN detection parameters were compared between the groups. All patients underwent level I and II axillary dissections after SLNB.

RESULTS

In group A, the SLN detection rate was 96.9% (93/96), the accuracy of detection was 98.9% (92/93), and the false-negative rate (FNR) was 3.4% (1/29). In group B, the SLN detection rate was 84.9% (62/73), the accuracy of detection was 96.8% (60/62), and the FNR was 11.1% (2/18). The ICG-PB group showed significantly superior results compared to the PB group for SLN detection (p=0.005) and a greatly improved FNR.

CONCLUSION

The combined fluorescence and blue dye-based tracer technique was superior to the use of blue dye alone for identifying SLNs, and for predicting axillary lymph node status in patients with breast cancer; in addition, the combined technique had reduced false-negative results.

Validation of a nomogram predicting sentinel lymph node status in melanoma in an Irish population

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity is an important prognostic factor in cutaneous melanoma. A nomogram has been developed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) to predict SLN positivity and this may be useful to select patients for SLN biopsy.

AIMS

We aimed to determine whether this nomogram would be of clinical use in an Irish population.

METHODS

Age, Breslow thickness, Clark's level, presence of ulceration and tumour location indices were used to calculate the probability of SLN positivity with the MSKCC nomogram in 124 patients who underwent SLN biopsy in Beaumont Hospital between 2006 and 2012. Discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated. Negative predictive value (NPV) of the nomogram was calculated, using a cut-off of nomogram predicted probability of <9%.

RESULTS

SLN biopsy was positive in 25 patients (20.16%). Overall predictive accuracy of the nomogram was found to be significant with an area under the curve of 0.805 (95% confidence interval 0.710-0.899). The mean predicted probability correlated well with observed risk (r = 0.887). The NPV was 92.86% with an error rate of 3.23%. This would lead to a reduction in SLN biopsy rate of 45.16%.

CONCLUSIONS

This nomogram is valid and accurate at predicting SLN positivity in an Irish population. This may facilitate the clinical decision to perform a SLN biopsy in malignant melanoma.

Breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping using near-infrared guided indocyanine green in comparison with blue dye

Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) was considered to have the potential to improve sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in breast cancer. Herein, we performed a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of ICG fluorescence imaging compared with blue dye imaging in SLN navigation surgery. We also analyzed lymph drainage pathways to identify targets for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Finally, 68 consecutive patients diagnosed with breast cancer and who underwent SLNB between November 2010 and September 2012 were enrolled in the study. The cases were randomly grouped into either the ICG fluorescence or blue dye group, with 36 in the ICG fluorescence group and 32 in the blue dye group. Levels I and II axillary dissection was performed in all cases after SLNB. A single lymph drainage pathway was detected in 21 of 36 (58.3%) patients, and multiple lymph drainage pathways were detected in 15 of 36 (41.7%) cases. The detection rate of SLNB was higher by ICG fluorescence than by blue dye (97.2 vs. 81.3%, p < 0.05), as 3.6 SLNs were detected on average in the ICG fluorescence group compared to 2.1 in the blue dye group. However, the sensitivity and false-negative rate were similar in the two groups. In conclusion, ICG fluorescence was superior to blue dye for the identification of the SLN.

The prognostic significance of sentinel node tumour burden in melanoma patients: an international, multicenter study of 1539 sentinel node-positive melanoma patients

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel node (SN) biopsy (SNB) and completion lymph node dissection (CLND) when SN-positive have become standard of care in most cancer centres for melanoma. Various SN tumour burden parameters are assessed to determine the heterogeneity of SN-positivity. The aim of the present study was to validate the prognostic significance of various SN tumour burden micromorphometric features and classification schemes in a large cohort of SN-positive melanoma patients.

METHODS

In 1539 SN-positive patients treated between 1993 and 2008 at 11 melanoma treatment centres in Europe and Australia, indices of SN tumour burden (intranodal location, tumour penetrative depth (TPD) and maximum size of SN tumour deposits) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Non-subcapsular location, increasing TPD and increasing maximum size were all predictive factors for non-SN (NSN) status and were independently associated with poorer melanoma-specific survival (MSS). Patients with subcapsular micrometastases <0.1mm in maximum dimension had the lowest frequency of NSN metastasis (5.5%). Despite differences in SN biopsy protocols and clinicopathologic features of the patient cohorts (between centres), most SN parameters remained predictive in individual centre populations. Maximum SN tumour size>1mm was the most reliable and consistent parameter independently associated with higher non-SN-positivity, poorer disease-free survival (DFS) and poorer MSS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large retrospective, multicenter cohort study, several parameters of SN tumour burden including intranodal location, TPD and maximum size provided prognostic information, but their prognostic significance varied considerably between the different centres. This could be due to sample size limitations or to differences in SN detection, removal and examination techniques.

Surgical management of melanoma: an EORTC Melanoma Group survey

Objectives:

The objective of the article is to explore the surgical practices and views in the treatment of melanoma within members and non-members of the EORTC Melanoma Group (MG) during the years 2003–2005.

Methods:

An e-mail questionnaire (see appendix) developed within the EORTC MG was sent to all melanoma units (MUs) of the EORTC (180) and to selected international centres between 2003 and 2005. The questionnaire investigated the different practices regarding surgical management of melanoma patients at all stages.

Results:

A total of 75 questionnaires were returned from centres in Europe (70), Israel (3), Australia (1) and the United States (1). Resection margins on primary melanoma vary according to AJCC 2002 staging. Sixty three of 75 MUs perform Sentinel node biopsy. Modified radical neck dissection is performed in 82% of MUs for macrometastases and in 80% of MUs for micrometastases. Most MUs surveyed perform all three levels of Berg axillary dissection whether for macrometastases (79%) or micrometastases (62%). An ilio inguinal-obturator dissection is proposed with macrometastases (41% of MUs), whereas 33% of MUs perform a pelvic dissection only if the Cloquet node is positive. Twenty five of 75 MUs perform an isolated limb perfusion with a therapeutic indication; three also as an adjuvant. The majority of MUs perform surgery for distant metastases including superficial (53 of 75 [71%]) or solitary visceral metastases (52 of 75[69%]) or for palliation (58 of 75[77%]).

Conclusion:

The adequacy of surgery appears to be the most important milestone in the therapeutic approach of melanoma. Even if surgery is fundamental in the different stages of the disease, there is quite a variability concerning the extension of the surgical treatment related to primary and lymphnodal disease. Phase III randomised trials have shown that wide margins, elective lymph node dissections, and prophylactic isolated limb perfusions have not improved survival and cannot be considered the standard of care in the routine management of primary melanoma. The surgical subgroup of the EORTC Melanoma Group is developing a new version of the surgical survey questionnaire including new treatment modalities like isolated limb infusion and electrochemotherapy, which were not frequently in use some years ago, to obtain new data to be compared to the nearly ten-year-old data.

Lymphatic biomarkers in primary melanomas as predictors of regional lymph node metastasis and patient outcomes

Recently developed lymphatic-specific immunohistochemical markers can now be utilized to assess intratumoral and/or peritumoral lymphatic vessel density (LVD), to detect lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) by melanoma cells and to identify lymphatic marker expression in melanoma cells themselves. We systematically reviewed the available evidence for the expression of lymphatic markers as predictors of regional node metastasis and survival in melanoma patients. The currently available evidence suggests that LVD (particularly in a peritumoral location) and LVI are predictors of sentinel node metastasis and poorer survival. Nevertheless, adherence to international guidelines in the conduct and reporting of the studies was generally poor, with wide methodologic variations and heterogeneous findings. Larger, carefully conducted and well-reported studies that confirm these preliminary findings are required before it would be appropriate to recommend the routine application of costly and time-consuming immunohistochemistry for lymphatic markers in the routine clinical assessment of primary cutaneous melanomas.

Application of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous basosquamous carcinoma

Basosquamous carcinoma of the skin is a relatively rare cutaneous neoplasm that has significant metastatic potential and a metastatic rate greater than that of basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma. We describe the use of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in a 63-year-old man after identification of basosquamous carcinoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy, which is a standard tool to detect regional lymphatic metastasis in cutaneous melanoma, has been rarely employed to detect lymphatic metastasis of basosquamous carcinoma. The approach was successful in detecting a regional lymphatic metastasis of two nodal basins with minor morbidity. Sentinel lymph node biopsy may be useful for certain high-risk lesions of basosquamous carcinoma.

High rate of solitary sentinel node metastases identification by fluorescence-guided lymphatic imaging in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The lymph node status was shown to be an important prognostic factor for breast cancer, but controversial issues remain. There has been increased focus on optimizing the visualization of lymph nodes for an accurate and selective approach to axillary lymph nodes. Fluorescence-guided lymphatic imaging is a potential candidate for further research on remaining controversies.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients were subject to injection of indocyanine green for navigation to the SLN based on fluorescent dye retention detection. In two groups, patients either received intended axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for superstaging or isolated SLNB for minimal-invasive staging. The prospective study was designed to evaluate the technical feasibility with focus on solitary positive SLN.

RESULTS

Visualization of lymphatic vessels with bright fluorescence of the SLN was feasible in 46 of 47 patients. Eighteen of 19 nodal positive patients were correctly identified with a sensitivity of 94.7% in all patients after ALND. After immunohistochemistry, in 19 of 25 overall nodal positive patients (76%) the SLN was the only positive lymph node.

CONCLUSION

Fluorescence-guided imaging using fluorescence retention detection allows transcutaneous navigation with a high rate of solitary positive SLN identification as an alternative technique for further research.

Primary cutaneous malignancies in sub-Saharan Africa

Cutaneous malignancies are the most common malignancies in Whites; traditionally considered rare among Blacks, their occurrence in sub-Saharan Africa is yet to be fully characterized.Data on specimens submitted between 1992 and April 2008 on all histologically proven primary cutaneous malignancies were collected from the Pathology Department, including patient age, sex, anatomic site of malignancy, and histologic diagnosis. There were 1900 patients with primary cutaneous malignancies, aged between 8 months and 110 years, with a mean age of 49 years. There were 14 different types of malignancies found, with squamous cell carcinoma representing 45% of the total. A number of the rarer types have not been reported previously, from this region.Cutaneous malignancies in Africa present a number of management challenges including the following: difficulties in early diagnosis in the dark skin, late presentation, access to treatment, and the ability to pay for the appropriate treatment. The current human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome scourge on the continent may lead a significant increase in cutaneous malignancies, posing even bigger challenges.

Prognostic factors in cutaneous desmoplastic melanoma: a study of 252 patients

BACKGROUND

Desmoplastic melanoma (DM) is a rare subtype of melanoma that is characterized by malignant spindle cells separated by prominent, fibrocollagenous stroma. Primary melanomas either may be entirely desmoplastic or almost entirely desmoplastic (pure DM [pDM]) or may exhibit a desmoplastic component admixed with a nondesmoplastic component (combined DM [cDM]).

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed between 1993 and 2007 at a single institution with clinically localized, primary cutaneous melanoma (PCM) that contained a desmoplastic component and who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy were identified. Clinical and pathologic features of the primary tumors were correlated with DM type, SLN status, and patient outcome.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-two patients (167 men, 85 women) were identified (median age, 61 years). The median tumor thickness was 2.0 mm. One hundred twenty-three patients (48.8%) had pDM, and 129 patients (51.2%) had cDM. Overall, 17 patients (6.7%) had positive SLN status, including 12 patients with cDM and 5 patients with pDM. Because of the low SLN-positive rate, a statistically significant difference in SLN status between patients with cDM (8.5%) and patients with pDM (4.9%; P = .25) could not be demonstrated. Older patient age, being a man, positive SLN status, and increasing tumor thickness were associated significantly with poorer disease-free survival (P < .05), although only the latter 2 variables were independently predictive. In addition, cDM type (P = .017) was associated significantly and independently with a shorter time to recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In this largest study to date of patients with DM who underwent SLN biopsy, the SLN-positive rate in patients with DM was lower than that in patients with conventional melanoma. The results indicated that DM type is associated significantly and independently with the time to recurrence and should be evaluated routinely in all patients with PCM. Cancer 2010. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.

Non-Sentinel Node Risk Score (N-SNORE): a scoring system for accurately stratifying risk of non-sentinel node positivity in patients with cutaneous melanoma with positive sentinel lymph nodes

PURPOSE

Sentinel node (SN) biopsy allows identification of patients with melanoma at risk of further metastatic disease in regional non-sentinel nodes (NSN). We investigated clinicopathologic factors that predict NSN positivity in an attempt to identify patients who may be safely spared completion lymph node dissection (CLND).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathologic factors previously shown to be predictive of NSN positivity were analyzed in 409 patients with SN-positive disease (309 of whom underwent CLND) managed at a single melanoma center. A weighted score Non-Sentinel Node Risk Score [N-SNORE] incorporating predictive factors was derived, and the efficacy of N-SNORE at stratifying risk of NSN involvement was studied.

RESULTS

Factors independently predictive of NSN positivity included primary tumor regression, proportion of harvested SNs involved by melanoma (%PosSN), sex (trend), and SN tumor burden indices (maximum size of largest deposit [MaxSize], % cross-sectional area of SN occupied by tumor, tumor penetrative depth, intranodal location of tumor) and perinodal lymphatic invasion (PLI). Of SN tumor burden criteria, MaxSize was the strongest predictor. N-SNORE was the sum of scores for five parameters: sex (female = 0, male = 1), regression (absent = 0, present = 2), %PosSN (absent = 0, present = 2), MaxSize (≤ 0.5 mm = 0, 0.51 to 2.00 mm = 1, 2.01 to 10.00 mm = 2, > 10.00 mm = 3), and PLI (absent = 0, present = 3). N-SNOREs of 0, 1 to 3, 4 to 5, 6 to 7, and ≥ 8 were associated with very low (0%), low (5% to 10%), intermediate (15% to 20%), high (40% to 50%), and very high (70% to 80%) risks of NSN involvement.

CONCLUSION

A weighted score (N-SNORE) based on clinicopathologic characteristics accurately stratifies risk of NSN involvement in patients with melanoma. If validated in future studies, N-SNORE will better predict prognosis, aid in management decisions, and stratify patient groups for entry into clinical trials.

Multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in lymphatic drainage and sentinel node tumor burden

PURPOSE

We assessed molecular (presence of melanoma cells markers in lymph fluid [LY]) and pathological features (sentinel lymph node [SN] tumor burden according to Rotterdam criteria, metastases microanatomic location) and correlated them with survival and melanoma prognostic factors in a group of patients with positive SN biopsy.

METHODS

We analyzed 368 consecutive SN-positive patients after completion lymph node dissection (CLND). In 321 patients we obtained data on SLN microanatomic location/tumor burden (only 7 cases had metastases <0.1 mm); in 137 we additionally analyzed 24-hour collected LY after CLND (multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction [MM-RT-PCR] with primers for tyrosinase, MART1 (MelanA), and uMAGE mRNA (27.7% positive samples)]. Median follow-up time was 41 months.

RESULTS

According to univariate analysis, the following factors had a negative impact on overall survival (OS): higher Breslow thickness (P = .0001), ulceration (P < .0001), higher Clark level (P = .008), male gender (P = .0001), metastatic lymph nodes >1 (P < .0001), nodal metastases extracapsular extension (P < .0001), metastases to additional non-SNs (P = .0004), micrometastases size ≥ 0.1 mm (P = .0006), and positive LY MM-RT-PCR (P = .0007). SN tumor burden showed linear correlation with increasing Breslow thickness (P = .01). The 5-year OS rates for SLN tumor burden <0.1 mm, 1-1.0 mm, and >1.0 mm were 84%/66%/44%, respectively, and for positive and negative LY MM-RT-PCR 47%/0%, respectively. The independent factors for shorter OS (multivariate analysis): male gender, primary tumor ulceration, number of involved nodes ≥ 4, micrometastases size >1.0 mm, and, in additional model including molecular analysis-positive MM-RT-PCR results (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2), micrometastases size >1.0 mm (HR 1.13), and primary tumor ulceration (HR 2.17). Similar results were demonstrated for disease-free survival (DFS) data.

CONCLUSIONS

SN tumor burden categories according to Rotterdam criteria and the positive result of LY MM-RT-PCR assay demonstrated additional, independent prognostic value in SN-positive melanoma patients, showing significant correlation with shorter DFS and OS.

Importance of tumor load in the sentinel node in melanoma: clinical dilemmas

There are two hypotheses to explain melanoma dissemination: first, simultaneous lymphatic and hematogeneous spread, with regional lymph nodes as indicators of metastatic disease; and second, orderly progression, with regional lymph nodes as governors of metastatic disease. The sentinel node (SN) has been defined as the first draining lymph node from a tumor and is harvested with the use of the triple technique and is processed by an extensive pathology protocol. The SN status is a strong prognostic factor for survival (83-94% for SN negative, 56-75% SN-positive patients). False-negative rates are considerable (9-21%). Preliminary results of the MSLT-1 trial did not demonstrate a survival benefit for the SN procedure, although a subgroup analysis indicates a possible benefit. A mathematical model has demonstrated 24% prognostic false positivity. SN tumor burden represents a heterogeneous patient population and is classified most frequently with the Starz, Dewar or Rotterdam Criteria. A completion lymph-node dissection might not be indicated in all SN-positive patients. Patients classified with metastases <0.1 mm by the Rotterdam Criteria have excellent survival rates. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology is emerging as a staging tool for high-risk patients, but more research is necessary before this can change clinical practice.

Expert opinion in melanoma: the sentinel node; EORTC Melanoma Group recommendations on practical methodology of the measurement of the microanatomic location of metastases and metastatic tumour burden

The sentinel node (SN) status has been recognised to be the most important prognostic factor in melanoma. Many studies have investigated additional factors to further predict survival/lymph node involvement. The EORTC Melanoma Group (MG) has formulated the following question: How should we report the microanatomic location and SN tumour burden? The EORTC MG recommends the following: the EORTC MG SN pathology protocol or a similarly extensive protocol, which has also been proven to be accurate, should be used. Only measure what you can see not what you presume. Cumulative measurements decrease the accuracy and reproducibility of measuring. The most reproducible measure is a single measurement of the maximum diameter of the largest lesion in any direction (1-D). If there is any infiltration into the parenchyma, this lesion can no longer be considered solely subcapsular. Reporting of the microanatomic location of metastases should be an assessment of the entire sentinel node, not only of the largest lesion. Multifocality reflects a scattered metastatic pattern, not to be confused with multiple cohesive foci, which fall under the regular location system. A subcapsular metastasis should have a smooth usually curved outline, not ragged or irregular. We recommend all pathologists to report the following items per positive SN for melanoma patients: the microanatomic location of the metastases according to Dewar et al. for the entire node, the SN Tumour Burden according to the Rotterdam Criteria for the maximum diameter of the largest metastasis expressed as an absolute number, and the SN Tumour Burden stratified per category; <0.1mm or 0.1-1.0mm or >1.0mm.

Current concepts in cutaneous melanoma: malignant melanoma

Melanoma of the skin is one of the most clinically important skin and soft tissue lesions encountered by the practicing general surgeon. If it is properly diagnosed and treated in its early stages, its prognosis and outcome are uniformly favorable. The current concepts in malignant melanoma are discussed.

Clinical and histopathological risk factors to predict sentinel lymph node positivity, disease-free and overall survival in clinical stages I-II AJCC skin melanoma: outcome analysis from a single-institution prospectively collected database

BACKGROUND

To investigate if the tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are able to predict the sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in clinical stages I-II AJCC primary cutaneous melanoma (PCM).

METHODS

The study included consecutive patients with PCM, all diagnosed, treated and followed up prospectively. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between DFS, OS, SLN positivity and Breslow thickness, Clark level, TIL, ulceration, lesion site, gender, regression and age.

RESULTS

From November 1998 to October 2008, 1251 consecutive patients with PCM were evaluated. Median age was 51 (range 15-96) with 32.2% (N=393) of them older than 60; 44.8% of them were males. Of the whole series, a total of 404 patients with primary vertical growth phase (VGP) melanoma and no clinical evidence of metastatic disease underwent SLN biopsy. Of these, 74 (18.8%) had a positive SLN. In a multivariate analysis, primary melanoma on the extremities versus that on the axial locations (truncal and head/neck) (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.98, p 0.04) and TILs (TILs versus no TILs) (OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.25-0.90, p 0.02) were predictive for lower probability of SLN involvement, while thickness (>4mm versus 0-1mm) (OR 24, 19, 95% CI 4.91-119.13, p<.001) was predictive for higher risk of SLN positivity. A multivariate stepwise analysis confirmed these results. The histological status of the SLN was the most significant predictor of DFS and OS. Patients with a negative SLN had a 5-year DFS of 75.9%, compared with 35.2% in patients with a positive SLN (p<.0001) and a 5-year OS of 88.7% versus 42.9%, respectively (p<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the absence of TILs predicts SLN metastasis, in multivariate analysis the SLN positivity predicts DFS and OS.

Validation of a nomogram to predict the presence of sentinel lymph node metastases in melanoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node involvement is a very important prognostic factor for cutaneous melanoma. In this paper we try to validate a nomogram that was created at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, to predict the probability of metastases in the sentinel nodes of patients with cutaneous melanoma.

METHODS

Values of the following variables were collected in 218 patients with cutaneous melanoma and sentinel lymph node: age, thickness, level of Clark, location of the lesion, and ulceration or not, and the nomogram was applied to assess the probability of sentinel node involvement in each patient. The discrimination of the nomogram was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, and to assess the accuracy of the nomogram actual probabilities were plotted against the nomogram-calculated predicted probability.

RESULTS

The overall predictive accuracy of the nomogram was 0.869 (95% confidence interval 0.813-0.925). Mean predicted probability of sentinel node metastasis was highly correlated to the observed risk (r = 0.953; P < 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The nomogram is a useful diagnostic tool that provides an adequate accurate prediction of the probability of sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

The survival benefit to patients with positive sentinel node melanoma after completion lymph node dissection may be limited to the subgroup with a primary lesion Breslow thickness greater than 1.0 and less than or equal to 4 mm (pT2-pT3)

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of sentinel node biopsy is still controversial. The aim of our study was to assess the overall survival (OS; calculated both from the date of primary tumor excision and lymph node dissection) data from two large groups of AJCC 2002 stage-III cutaneous melanoma patients-after completion lymph node dissection (CLND after positive sentinel node biopsy) and after therapeutic LND (TLND for clinically/cytologically detected regional lymph node metastases).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the outcomes for 544 consecutive patients, who underwent CLND (47.4%; 258 patients) or TLND (52.6%; 286 patients) at one institution between December 1994 and January 2005. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age and gender distribution and in the parameters of the primary tumor. Median follow-up time was 36 months (range 6-110 months).

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in OS (from the date of primary tumor excision) between CLND and TLND patients in the groups with primary tumor thicknesses of 1.0 mm or less or greater than 4.0 mm (pT1 and pT4); however, in patients with thicknesses greater than 1.0 mm and 4.0 mm or less (in subgroups pT2 and pT3), we found significantly better OS for CLND than for TLND patients-CLND: median OS not reached, 5-year OS was 57.2% (95%CI: 44.4-70.1%); TLND: median OS 42.1 months, 5-year OS was 37.9% (95%CI: 26.5-49.2%) (P = 0.0006). In the entire CLND and TLND groups, the median OS and 5-year OS rates were 60.5 months and 52.5% (95%CI: 45.6-61.5%) and 38.2 months and 39.5% (95%CI: 32.7-46.5%), respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, we have found that in the CLND group the important factors negatively influencing OS (from the date of lymphadenectomy) are: male gender, features of primary tumor (higher Breslow thickness and presence of ulceration) and features of nodal metastases (extracapsular invasion and number of involved nodes). In the TLND group, however, the negative prognostic factors are: male gender and features of nodal metastases (extracapsular invasion and number of involved nodes) without the impact of primary tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study demonstrate that the survival benefit after positive sentinel node biopsy with subsequent CLND is probably limited only to the subgroup of patients with primary tumor thicknesses not larger than 4 mm and not less than 1 mm when compared with lymph node dissection of palpable nodes. The primary tumor features have no impact on survival after lymphadenectomy performed for clinically involved nodes.

Randomized adjuvant therapy trials in melanoma: surgical and systemic

The utility of adjuvant surgical procedures in the management of primary melanomas has been evaluated in a large number of phase III randomized trials. These trials have shown that wide margins, elective lymph node dissection, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, and prophylactic isolated limb perfusion (ILP) do not improve survival but may improve locoregional control. Based on the claim of providing a survival benefit, these surgical procedures cannot be considered standard of care in the routine management of primary melanoma. Regarding the role of SLN biopsy it must be stated that this procedure provides the best information on prognosis and provides us with an important tool to stratify for and study more homogeneous patient populations to evaluate adjuvant systemic therapies in randomized phase III trials. The utility of systemic adjuvant therapy remains marginal as a result of the fact that a lack of effective drugs in stage IV disease is reflected by a lack of effective adjuvant therapies in stage II-III melanoma. Thus far, chemotherapeutic drugs, immunostimulants, and various vaccines have all failed. Interferon (IFN) has an effect on relapse-free survival but not on overall survival. Thus its impact is judged by many to be too small to be considered standard of care. The population of patients that can benefit from IFN needs to be better defined by identifying new biomarkers by genomic and proteomic studies, which are ongoing.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in histologically ambiguous melanocytic tumors with spitzoid features (so-called atypical spitzoid tumors)

BACKGROUND

The distinction of Spitz nevi from melanomas with spitzoid morphology can be difficult. For lesions with overlapping histopathologic features, it may be impossible to predict their malignant potential with certainty. The current study evaluated the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with such atypical spitzoid tumors.

METHODS

The clinical and histopathologic features of 21 patients with atypical spitzoid tumors who underwent SLN biopsy were reviewed and correlated with the presence or absence of metastatic tumor in their corresponding SLNs.

RESULTS

The atypical histopathologic features that were most frequently present included incomplete maturation (11 patients, 52%), two or more dermal mitoses per square millimeter (13 patients, 62%), and deep dermal mitoses (11 patients, 52%). Six patients (29%) showed SLN metastasis. There were histopathologic differences between tumors with positive SLN when compared with tumors with negative SLN: mean tumor thickness (3.38 mm vs. 2.04 mm), incomplete maturation (83% vs. 40%), median dermal mitotic rate (3.5/mm(2) vs. 2/mm(2)), deep dermal mitoses (83% vs. 47%), and expansile dermal nodules (50% vs. 13%). However, of these, only the difference in mean tumor thickness reached statistical significance (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

SLN biopsy offers a means of assessing the metastatic potential of atypical spitzoid tumors and aids in the management of these patients by selecting patients who may benefit from a regional node field dissection and those in whom the use of adjuvant therapies could be considered.

Sentinel node biopsy versus elective lymph node dissection in patients with cutaneous melanoma in a Japanese population

BACKGROUND

In Japan, elective lymph node dissection (ELND) has been the standard treatment for patients with possible nodal melanoma. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has now replaced ELND, not only in Japan but also worldwide. The objective of this study was to compare the interim outcomes of SNB and ELND.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted among patients with clinically node-negative disease treated at our institute with either SNB (n = 30) or ELND (n = 72).

RESULTS

The background was similar in the two groups. Nodal metastases were found in 40.0% of patients in the SNB group, but in only 26.4% in the ELND group (P = 0.173). The median follow-up was 31.5 months for the SNB group and 82 months for the ELND group. The incidence of locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis in the SNB group was 10.0% and 16.7%, respectively, and for the ELND group the incidence was 5.6% and 31.9%, respectively. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was similar in the two groups (P = 0.280), and the 3-year disease-free survival rates for node-positive patients were also similar in the two groups (P = 0.90), as were the 3-year disease-free survival rates for node-negative patients (P = 0.193).

CONCLUSION

This interim result in a Japanese melanoma population with clinically node-negative disease demonstrated that SNB identified more nodal micrometastases than ELND. This increase in accurate staging likely resulted from the reliable identification of the lymph node field by lymphoscintigraphy, as well as the more detailed pathologic examination of the nodes removed in SNB. It is quite reasonable to perform SNB instead of ELND in this population.

Multivariable analysis comparing outcome after sentinel node biopsy or therapeutic lymph node dissection in patients with melanoma

Background

Sentinel node (SN) status is the most important prognostic factor for overall survival in stage I or II melanoma. Yet SN-positive tumours with submicroscopic involvement of the SN (clusters of cells smaller than 0·1 mm) have shown a distant recurrence rate of only 9 per cent at 5 years, as good as that in SN-negative patients. This study compared the outcome after completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in SN-positive tumours with elective total lymph node dissection (TLND) in patients with palpable nodes.

Methods

A total of 188 patients were identified; 124 had TLND and 64 had CLND. Median follow-up was 56 and 37 months respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding tumour Breslow thickness, ulceration and site of the primary tumour. Survival rates were calculated from date of primary excision. All patients with primary melanomas on extremities or trunk were included.

Results

On univariable analysis, the site of the primary tumour (extremity versus trunk) (P &lt; 0·001), Breslow thickness (P = 0·005) and ulceration (P &lt; 0·001) were prognostic for overall survival. There was a non-significant 13 per cent difference in overall survival at 5 years between CLND and TLND (P = 0·115). Excluding 15 patients who had SN disease with submicrometastases reduced the difference to 6 per cent (P = 0·415).

Conclusion

This study showed no significant survival benefit for SN-positive CLND compared with TLND, especially when patients with nodes containing submicrometastases were excluded.

Impact of False-Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Survival in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is widely accepted as standard care in melanoma despite lack of pertinent randomized trials results. A possible pitfall of this procedure is the inaccurate identification of the sentinel lymph node leading to biopsy and analysis of a nonsentinel node. Such a technical failure may yield a different prognosis. The purpose of this study is to analyze the incidence of false negativity and its impact on clinical outcome and to try to understand its causes.

METHODS

The Melanoma Data Base at National Cancer Institute of Naples was analyzed comparing results between false-negative and tumor-positive sentinel node patients focusing on overall survival and prognostic factors influencing the clinical outcome.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-one cases were diagnosed to be tumor-positive after sentinel lymph node biopsy and were subjected to complete lymph node dissection. Thirty-four (18.4%)patients with tumor-negative sentinel node subsequently developed lymph node metastases in the basin site of the sentinel procedure. With a median follow-up of 42.8 months the 5-year overall survival was 48.4% and 66.3% for false-negative and tumor-positive group respectively with significant statistical differences (P < .03).

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy was 81.6%, and a regional nodal basin recurrence after negative-sentinel node biopsy means a worse prognosis, compared with patients submitted to complete lymph node dissection after a positive sentinel biopsy. The evidence of higher number of tumor-positive nodes after delayed lymphadenectomy in false-negative group compared with tumor-positive sentinel node cases, confirmed the importance of an early staging of lymph nodal involvement. Further data will better clarify the role of prognostic factors to identify cases with a more aggressive biological behavior of the disease.

Reliability of sentinel lymph-node extirpation as a diagnostic method for malignant melanoma of the head and neck region

A series of 106 patients with malignant melanoma of the head and neck and clinically negative local lymph-node status were included in a multimodal therapy programme and underwent sentinel lymph-node extirpation in 1999-2003. Out of 246 preoperatively marked lymph nodes, only 172 (70%) were identified intraoperatively and removed. In 89% of all patients at least one sentinel lymph node was removed. Histological examination revealed metastases in the sentinel lymph nodes of 17 patients. In the mean follow-up period of 47 months (range 4-76 months), regional lymph-node metastases were found in another eight patients. The non-marked lymph nodes that were often removed at the same time, in an elective cervical lymph-node dissection, did not reveal any metastasis in any of the cases where the sentinel lymph nodes were negative. The sensitivity of sentinel lymph-node extirpation was influenced by the length of the follow-up period and the detection rate, and was 68% (17/17+8), a result superior to that of any other diagnostic tool. Sentinel lymph-node extirpation is a valuable method in addition to elective lymph-node dissection.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in adenocarcinoma of minor salivary gland

Adenocarcinoma of the minor salivary gland (MSG) is a rare neoplasm. It represents about 2% of all MSG malignant tumours. It is more common in the palate and in females. This tumour occurs in a mean age of sixty and its mean size at presentation is 1.5cm. Microscopically, the neoplasms classified as adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS) are a histologically heterogeneous group: they vary from highly anaplastic adenocarcinoma to moderate and well-differentiated lesions. This report describes a case of adenocarcinoma of MSG occurring in the buccal mucosa of a 24-year-old male. The patient underwent a sentinel node biopsy as a staging tool in association with the primary surgical treatment. In the histological examination of sentinel lymph node (SLN) there was no evidence of metastatic disease. The patient presents no evidence of recurrent disease after 4years of follow-up. We believe that the use of SLN biopsy can be indicated in similar cases considering the tumoural biology (well-differentiated) because prospective randomized studies would be very difficult to be performed due to the rarity of this neoplasm.

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of melanoma

During the last 2 decades, the development and wide acceptance of SLN biopsy have affected the management of melanoma profoundly. This technique represents a considerable improvement in the ability to evaluate the tumor status of the regional lymph node basin, which is the most important predictor of survival in patients who have melanoma. Histopathologic and molecular assessment of the SLN has enhanced the detection of clinically occult nodal metastases, thereby distinguishing patients who might benefit from immediate lymphadenectomy from those for whom this procedure is unlikely to be helpful. This technique also identifies patients who would be candidates for clinical trials of adjuvant therapy. Centers can offer SLN biopsy without routine CLND once they reach a level of proficiency that usually corresponds to a learning phase of 55 cases. The role of molecular technology in the identification and analysis of the SLN remains to be established. Although molecular evidence of SLN metastasis has been identified in patients who have early-stage melanoma, its clinical relevance cannot be determined until marker selection is improved. The markers presently under study lack sensitivity and specificity. The role of molecular biomarkers can be validated only through large, multicenter, randomized. controlled trials such as the MSLT-II, a trial that will determine the benefit of multimarker RT-PCR assay in SLN specimens. SLN offers a promising future in staging lymph nodes and will improve the management of patients who have melanoma. Although SLN biopsy has become widely accepted as a minimally invasive technique of staging regional lymph nodes, its use in patients who have melanoma continues to be challenged. The future of SLN biopsy holds promise if prospective multicenter trials confirm a survival benefit for SLN biopsy as compared with watch-and-wait observation.

Gender-related differences in outcome for melanoma patients

OBJECTIVE

To better understand the factors associated with the well-established gender difference in survival for patients with melanoma.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Gender is an important factor in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Male patients have a worse outcome when compared with females. The reasons for this difference are poorly understood.

METHODS

This prospective multi-institutional study included patients aged 18 to 70 years with melanomas > or =1.0 mm Breslow thickness. Wide excision and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was performed in all patients. Clinicopathologic factors, including gender, were assessed and correlated with disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 3324 patients were included in the covariate analyses; 1829 patients had follow-up data available and were included in the survival analyses. Median follow-up was 30 months. On univariate analysis, men (n = 1906) were more likely than women to be older than 60 years (P < 0.0001), have thicker melanomas (P < 0.0001), have primary tumor regression (P = 0.0054), ulceration (P < 0.0001), and axial primary tumor location (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, age (P = 0.0002), thickness (P < 0.0001), ulceration (P = 0.015), and location (P < 0.0001) remained significant in the model. There was no difference in the rate of SLN metastasis between men and women (P = 0.37) on multivariate analysis. When factors affecting survival were considered, the prognosis was worse for men as validated by lower DFS (P = 0.0005), DDFS (P < 0.0001), and OS (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Male gender is associated with a greater incidence of unfavorable primary tumor characteristics without an increased risk for nodal metastasis. Nonetheless, gender is an independent factor affecting survival.

Prospective Multi-Institutional Study of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Molecular Staging of Melanoma

Purpose

To evaluate the prognostic significance of molecular staging using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in detecting occult melanoma cells in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and circulating bloodstream.

Patients and Methods

In this multicenter study, eligibility criteria included patient age 18 to 71 years, invasive melanoma ≥ 1.0 mm Breslow thickness, and no clinical evidence of metastasis. SLN biopsy and wide excision of the primary tumor were performed. SLNs were examined by serial-section histopathology and S-100 immunohistochemistry. A portion of each SLN was frozen for RT-PCR. In addition, RT-PCR was performed on peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). RT-PCR analysis was performed using four markers: tyrosinase, MART1, MAGE3, and GP-100. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant–DFS (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

Results

A total of 1,446 patients with histologically negative SLNs underwent RT-PCR analysis. At a median follow-up of 30 months, there was no difference in DFS, DDFS, or OS between the RT-PCR–positive (n = 620) and RT-PCR–negative (n = 826) patients. Analysis of PBMC from 820 patients revealed significant differences in DFS and DDFS, but not OS, for patients with detection of more than one RT-PCR marker in peripheral blood.

Conclusion

In this large, prospective, multi-institutional study, RT-PCR analysis on SLNs and PBMCs provides no additional prognostic information beyond standard histopathologic analysis of SLNs. Detection of more than one marker in PBMC is associated with a worse prognosis. RT-PCR remains investigational and should not be used to direct adjuvant therapy at this time.

Randomized Trials in Melanoma: An Update

No effective therapy for metastatic melanoma exists. Polychemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy have not shown survival benefits. Vaccines have shown little activity in stage IV disease. To advance the identification of effective agents, new drugs can and should be offered as first-line treatment. Efforts must be made to improve understanding of the biology of malignant melanoma. Too many phase III trials have been conducted with a poor understanding of the mechanism of action of the involved drugs.

Identification of mRNA Markers for Molecular Staging of Lymph Nodes in Colorectal Cancer

Background: One evolving approach to improved prognostication of cancer patients is the identification of previously occult disease by use of quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Surprisingly, no systematic analysis of potential mRNA markers for colorectal cancer has been reported. We therefore performed an extensive mRNA marker survey for colorectal cancers.

Methods: We identified potential markers through literature and database searches. We analyzed all markers by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR on a limited set of primary tumors and benign lymph nodes. Selected markers were further evaluated on a larger tissue set with positive lymph nodes.

Results: We evaluated 43 markers and undertook further analysis of 6 in the secondary screening. Five gene markers—CDX1, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CK20, TACSTD1, and Villin1 (VIL1)—provided perfect classification of lymph node status.

Conclusions: Several mRNA markers are capable of providing exceptionally accurate characterization of lymph node status in colorectal cancer. An automated, multimarker, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay for characterization of lymph nodes from colorectal cancer patients may be useful for improved staging and therapeutic decision making in colorectal cancer.

[Anatomical location of the primary tumor as a variable to be considered in sentinel node biopsy of cutaneous melanoma]

INTRODUCTION

The anatomical location of cutaneous melanoma has been suggested to be an independent prognostic factor. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the location of the primary tumor influences sentinel node detection in cutaneous melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Two hundred twelve patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (96 of the limbs, 89 of the trunk and 27 of the head or neck) who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy were studied. Adequate lymphoscintigraphic and surgical localization was evaluated and epidemiological and histopathological variables, the number of lymph nodes draining the site of the primary lesion, sentinel nodes per drainage basin, and tumor-positive nodes were compared.

RESULTS

Localization was less successful for tumors of the head and neck (88.8%), both with lymphoscintigraphy (P<.001) and surgery (P<.0005), especially for lymph nodes adjacent to salivary glands (P<.0005). Melanomas of the trunk showed a greater number of nodes per lesion and wider variability in drainage pathways (P<.0005), although there were no differences in the number of sentinel nodes per drainage basin (P=.455).

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel node detection with less successful in cutaneous melanomas located in the head and neck. Location of the sentinel node adjacent to a salivary gland is a factor that influences its detection. Cutaneous melanomas of the trunk showed a higher number of draining nodes per lesion than those located in the limbs or head and neck.