Sentinel lymph node mapping in colon cancer: current status

Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Colorectal Cancer - First Experience

BACKGROUND:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second commonest cancer in women, the third in men, being the fourth commonest cause of cancer death. The most important factor for prognosis and staging in CRC patients is the status of the regional lymph nodes (LN).

AIM:

To implement the method for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in CRC patients using radiocolloid, and test its detection rate, sensitivity, accuracy, negative predictive value and the possibility for upstaging.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

The study included 40 CRC patients, age 63 ± 14 years, without LNs detected on CT or MRI. SLN detection was performed after endoscopically peri- and intratumoral injection of 99mTc-SENTISCINT. All patients underwent resection with systemic lymphadenectomy, and the SLNs were detected ex vivo. Pathohistology was performed to all resected LNs.

RESULTS:

The identification rate was 95%, the accuracy of the procedure was 92.1%, the negative predictive value was 86.95%, the sensitivity was 83.3%, and the upstage was 22.5%.

CONCLUSION:

Identification of SLNs in CRC patients with this method is possible and the detection rate, negative predictive value, accuracy and sensitivity are reliable. We expect to contribute in the upstaging of stage II CRC patients and the selection of appropriate oncology treatment protocols.

[Sentinel lymph node biopsy technique in colon cancer. Experience in 125 cases]

INTRODUCTION

The level of lymph node involvement is the most important factor in staging colorectal cancer without metastasis. Sentinel lymph node mapping identifies the node(s) that most accurately reflect the lymph node status of patients, and intensive techniques that improve staging can be focused on these nodes. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of ex vivo sentinel lymph node mapping in the staging of colon cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on 125 patients from the Alava-Txagorritxu University Hospital Health Region (Alava), who were diagnosed prior to surgery with colon cancer without distant metastasis from September 2009 to December 2011. Ex vivo sentinel lymph node mapping with methylene blue was use in these patients to study the sentinel nodes with multiple slices using immunohistochemical techniques and haematoxylin-eosin staining. A comparative study was also performed based on a control group of 170 patients staged with conventional techniques, and involving a single slice and haematoxylin-eosin staining.

RESULTS

The sentinel lymph node identification rate was 98%, with 5.6% false negatives. Upstaging occurred in 14.2% of cases compared to the group studied using conventional techniques (P=.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Ex vivo sentinel lymph node mapping with methylene blue accurately reflects the lymph node status of patients with colon cancer. This approach upstages patients classified as stages i and ii by conventional techniques to stage iii, indicating chemotherapy that may improve their prognosis.

Sentinel lymph node mapping in colon cancer using radiocolloid as a single tracer: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the feasibility and safety of radiocolloid as a tracer for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in colon cancer.

METHODS

A feasibility study was conducted in consecutive colon cancer patients who were surgically treated at our institute. During preoperative colonoscopy, radiocolloid was injected around the tumour, followed by scintigraphic imaging to identify SLNs. SLNs were identified intraoperatively by a gamma probe and postoperatively by additional ex-vivo scintigraphy of the resection specimen. All retrieved SLNs were examined by histopathological ultrastaging. Standard oncologic laparoscopic resections with lymphadenectomy were performed following the identification of SLNs in all patients.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were included. At least one SLN was identified in 86% of patients. In one patient (7%) SLNs could be detected intraoperatively. In 83% of patients, the SLNs accurately reflected the tumour status of the remaining lymph nodes. Aberrant lymphatic drainage was preoperatively identified in one patient (7%), but this could not be confirmed intraoperatively. Sensitivity was 67% and the false-negative rate was 33%. Seventeen per cent of patients were upstaged because of SLN micrometastases.

CONCLUSION

SLN mapping in colon cancer using radiocolloid as a single tracer is feasible and safe. However, it was difficult to identify SLNs intraoperatively because of high radioactivity at the injection site. Furthermore, the protocol is labour intensive, especially because of the additional colonoscopic tracer injection. Sensitivity is not better than when blue dye is used, and aberrant lymphatic drainage patterns are scarce. Therefore, this technique is not preferred for SLN mapping in colon cancer.

Occult tumor metastasis and the prognostic value of sentinel lymph nodes in rectal cancer

The aim of the present study to evaluate the application of sentinel lymph node (SLN) pathology in rectal cancer using ex vivo mapping and to investigate the incidence and prognostic value of occult SLN metastasis in routine node-negative specimens. Specimens (n=117) of rectal cancer were examined using a combination of routine pathology and ex vivo SLN mapping. The inspected SLNs were further treated with immunohistochemical staining for occult cancer foci. The log-rank test was used to assess survival. SLNs were examined in 112 of the included specimens with a total number of 212, resulting in an identification rate of 95.7% (112/117). The status of SLNs accurately reflected N stage in 93.8% (105/112) of cases and the sensitivity was 75.6% (31/41) in detecting nodal metastasis. The accuracy of SLN pathology decreased in cancers of more advanced TNM stages (P=0.001). In 74 cases with routine node-negative (N0) disease, SLN micrometastasis (MIC) and isolated tumor cells (ITC) were examined in 9 and 4 cases, while the remaining 61 were regarded as negative (NEG). The log-rank test revealed poorer disease-free and overall survival of the MIC group compared with the NEG group. However, the findings from the ITC group were not significant compared with those from the MIC and NEG groups. In conclusion, ex vivo SLN pathology is practical and accurate in rectal cancer; however, its utility is limited in cases of advanced disease. Immunohistochemically detected SLN micrometastasis in node-negative cases is therefore a predictor of poorer outcome, and may therefore be listed as a marker for adjuvant therapy.

Clinical value of sentinel node mapping in carcinoma of the colon

AIM

Sentinel lymph node mapping has been used in colon cancer to improve prognosis. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of in vivo SLNM in patients with colon carcinoma undergoing surgery with curative intent.

METHOD

Thirty-one patients operated for colon carcinoma underwent in vivo sentinel lymph node mapping using patent blue dye. Each sentinel lymph node (SLN) was marked intraoperatively, and histological examination was performed after en bloc resection. If no metastasis was found, step sectioning with immunohistochemistry was performed.

RESULTS

The SLN was successfully identified in 28 (90%) of 31 patients. The false-negative rate to identify stage III disease was 66% (eight of 12), the negative predictive value was 46% (19 of 27) and the accuracy was 14% (four of 28). One patient negative on routine histopathology had micrometastasis on step sectioning of the SLN.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node mapping in colon carcinoma cannot accurately predict nodal status.

A new concept for the role of ex vivo sentinel lymph nodes in node-negative colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

We recently introduced ex vivo, intra-arterial methylene blue injection as a simple method to improve the lymph node (LN) harvest in gastrointestinal cancer. We now combined it with a novel ex vivo sentinel lymph node (evSLN) mapping technique.

METHODS

evSLN mapping was performed by subserosal (n = 20) or submucosal (n = 30) India ink injection. Subsequently, methylene blue was injected intra-arterially to enhance visibility of all LNs to improve the overall LN harvest. Manual LN dissection was carried out after fixing overnight. evSLNs nodes were identified by detecting carbon particles during histological examination. In primary node-negative cases, all detected LNs were step sectioned and immunohistochemically stained for pan-cytokeratin.

RESULTS

India ink injection was easy to perform. Methylene blue injection failed in 1 case. The mean lymph node harvest was 42 ± 18 LNs, and the SLN detection rate was 78%. The sensitivity for detecting metastases was 75%. The mean SLN number was 3 ± 1. LN metastases were found in 20 of 47 malignant cases (43%). Skip metastases occurred in 4 cases. Of these cases, 3 showed involvement of at least 1 entire LN. True upstaging (N0 → N1mi) was found in 1 of 23 cases (4%) within a SLN after advanced evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of methylene blue technique and ex vivo sentinel mapping is feasible, easy to perform, and cost effective. It guarantees an optimal LN harvest and has the potential to heighten the sensitivity of metastasis detection.

Factors affecting false-negative rates on ex vivo sentinel lymph node mapping in colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Despite the increasing use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping after colorectal cancer resection, reported node identification and false-negative rates vary considerably. The main aim of this prospective study was to quantify the false-negative rates on SLN mapping after resection and to evaluate factors influencing them.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with biopsy-proven cancer of the colon and rectum underwent SLN mapping according to a protocol involving the ex vivo submucosal and peritumoral injection of 2-4 ml of Patent Blue V dye. All lymph nodes visualized were marked as SLN and totally embedded, then two 4 microm sections were cut for hematoxylin and eosin staining, and cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) immunostaining. A standard examination of the whole specimen and of the regional non-sentinel lymph nodes was also performed.

RESULTS

SLNs were identified in 97.3% of the evaluable cases. A mean of 5.0 SLNs were removed per patient (SD+/-4.2). Nine false negatives were identified. Rectal cancer, tumor size>60mm, number of metastatic non-sentinel lymph nodes, and mucinous tumors were associated with false-negative SLNs. At multivariate analysis, a rectal location and mucinous differentiation were independently associated with false-negative SLNs.

CONCLUSIONS

Ex vivo SLN mapping after colorectal cancer surgery is technically feasible with a high identification rate. Tumor size and stage, rectal involvement and a mucinous histology seem to interfere with the reliability of SLN staging. It is mandatory to standardize the procedure and selection criteria in order to deal with the question of the reliability of SLN mapping in colorectal cancer.

Clinically important aspects of lymph node assessment in colon cancer

There has been considerable discussion in the literature regarding the importance and validity of lymph node retrieval and lymph node count for patients with colon cancer. In this article we summarize the importance of lymph node resection and assessment in contemporary colon cancer care, key clinical determinants of lymph node assessment, and discuss the role of lymph node assessment as a quality marker in colon cancer care.

The potential of cytokeratin 20 and mucin 2 mRNA as metastasis markers in regional lymph nodes of colon cancer patients investigated by quantitative RT-PCR

PURPOSE

The presence of regional lymph node metastases is one of the most important prognostic factors in colon cancer. Nevertheless, up to 30% of the lymph node negative patients experience disease recurrence. Possibly, this patient group may be identified by more sensitive techniques than routine histopathological examination of the lymph nodes.

METHODS

In the present study, we have evaluated the detection of colon cancer lymph node metastases by real-time RT-PCR quantitation of the epithelial-specific cytokeratin 20 (CK20) and mucin 2 (MUC2) mRNAs.

RESULTS

Both assays were able to detect dilutions of tumor cells down to one tumor cell in 10(6) normal lymphocytes. CK20 and MUC2 mRNA were quantitated in 52 normal lymph nodes from 12 patients undergoing surgery for benign bowel diseases and in 144 primary colon tumors. The median tumor level of both markers were more than 10(4)-fold higher than the highest level in normal lymph nodes, indicating that the markers had a potential for metastasis detection in a clinical context. We applied the assays to 61 lymph nodes with known metastases detected by routine staining. Elevated CK20 or MUC2 mRNA levels were detected in 57 (95%) of the 61 LNs.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, CK20 and MUC2 quantitation by real-time RT-PCR seems to be a promising, sensitive tool to detect metastases in regional lymph nodes from colon cancer patients.

Could lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy provide oncological providence for local resectional techniques for colon cancer? A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resectional techniques for colon cancer are undermined by their inability to determine lymph node status. This limits their application to only those lesions at the most minimal risk of lymphatic dissemination whereas their technical capacity could allow intraluminal or even transluminal address of larger lesions. Sentinel node biopsy may theoretically address this breach although the variability of its reported results for this disease is worrisome.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were interrogated back to 1999 to identify all publications concerning lymphatic mapping for colon cancer with reference cross-checking for completeness. All reports were examined from the perspective of in vivo technique accuracy selectively in early stage disease (i.e. lesions potentially within the technical capacity of endoscopic resection).

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies detailing the experiences of 3390 patients were identified. Considerable variation in patient characteristics as well as in surgical and histological quality assurances were however evident among the studies identified. In addition, considerable contamination of the studies by inclusion of rectal cancer without subgroup separation was frequent. Indeed such is the heterogeneity of the publications to date, formal meta-analysis to pool patient cohorts in order to definitively ascertain technique accuracy in those with T1 and/or T2 cancer is not possible. Although lymphatic mapping in early stage neoplasia alone has rarely been specifically studied, those studies that included examination of false negative rates identified high T3/4 patient proportions and larger tumor size as being important confounders. Under selected circumstances however the technique seems to perform sufficiently reliably to allow it prompt consideration of its use to tailor operative extent.

CONCLUSION

The specific question of whether sentinel node biopsy can augment the oncological propriety for endoscopic resective techniques (including Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery [NOTES]) cannot be definitively answered at present. Study heterogeneity may account for the variability evident in the results from different centers. Enhanced capacity (perhaps to the level necessary to consider selective avoidance of en bloc mesenteric resection) by its confinement to only early stage disease is plausible although not proven. Specific study of the technique in early stage tumors is clearly essential before proffering this approach.

Optimal pathologic staging: defining stage II disease

Tumor stage remains the most important determinant of prognosis in colorectal cancer and is the basis of all authoritative patient management guidelines. The pathologic assessment of stage II disease is especially critical because it may help to identify patients at additional risk for whom surgery alone may not be curative. Accurate analysis of regional lymph nodes, extent of tumor penetration, and circumferential resection margins constitute the most crucial issues. For assignment of pN0, adequacy of the surgical resection and thoroughness of the lymph node harvest from the resection specimen are both essential. The minimum number of lymph nodes has been variably determined to be between 12 and 18 for assignment of pN0, but the confidence level increases with increasing numbers of nodes examined. The ability of exhaustive analysis of sentinel lymph nodes using special techniques to substitute for an exhaustive lymph node harvest and standard node examination has not been definitively shown. Although special techniques may facilitate the identification of minute amounts of tumor (i.e., isolated tumor cells) in regional lymph nodes, the prognostic significance of such findings remains unclear. Additional stage-independent pathologic features that have been validated as adverse prognostic factors include involvement by tumor of mural lymphovascular channels, venous vessels, or the surgical resection margin of the operative specimen and high tumor grade. The presence of these features may help to identify patients for whom surgery alone will not be curative and adjuvant therapies may be appropriate.