A phase II study of gemcitabine and capecitabine in advanced cholangiocarcinoma and carcinoma of the gallbladder: a single-institution prospective study

A Propensity Score Analysis of Chemotherapy Use in Patients With Resectable Gallbladder Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Gallbladder cancer is uncommon but highly fatal. Surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment for localized or locoregionally advanced gallbladder cancer. The rate of use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable gallbladder cancer is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess factors associated with the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable gallbladder cancer and survival outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify 6391 adults who underwent definitive surgical resection for gallbladder cancers between January 1, 2004, and January 1, 2016. Data analysis was performed from January 15 to February 15, 2020. Patients with localized or locoregionally advanced gallbladder cancers (ie, categories cTx-cT4, cN0-2, and cM0) were categorized as receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, or surgery alone. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test, with 1:3 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Survival outcomes between groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The use and survival outcomes of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 6391 patients who underwent definitive surgery for gallbladder cancer, 4559 were women (71.3%); median age was 68 (IQR, 59-77) years. A total of 3145 patients (49.2%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 3145 patients (49.2%) underwent surgery without chemotherapy, and 101 patients (1.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use was associated with treatment at an academic facility (61 patients [60%] vs 38 patients [38%] treated in a nonacademic facility; P < .001) and in those with private insurance (65 patients [65%] vs 11 patients [11%] with Medicaid insurance; P < .001). Surgery alone was frequently used in older patients (median age, 72 [IQR, 63-81] years vs 59 [IQR, 52-66] years in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy; P < .001), those with Medicare insurance (1925 patients [57%] vs 1438 patients [43%] with adjuvant chemotherapy; P < .001), and patients with a higher comorbidity index score (326 patients [62%] vs 197 patients [38%] with adjuvant chemotherapy; P < .001). Adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used more frequently than surgery in patients with node-positive cancer (1482 [67.2%] vs 53 [65.4%] vs 912 [49.7%]). On propensity score matching analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with longer survival than surgery alone (22 vs 18 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.96); survival with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not statistically significant compared with surgery alone and adjuvant chemotherapy groups (27 months, HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58-1.04). However, in patients with node-positive gallbladder cancer, neoadjuvant therapy was associated with longer median overall survival (30 months [95% CI, 24-36 months] vs 14 months [95% CI, 11-17] in patients with surgery alone; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy was low in patients with surgically resected gallbladder cancers. Chemotherapy was used more frequently than surgery in lymph node-positive disease compared with lymph node-negative disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a survival advantage in resectable gallbladder cancer, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increased survival in node-positive gallbladder cancers. These findings suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in treatment of gallbladder cancer.

TRAIL receptors are differentially regulated and clinically significant in gallbladder cancer

Deregulation of the receptors of TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) has been reported in various cancers. In an effort to define the role of these receptors we profiled their expression in gallbladder cancer (GBC) and explored their clinical significance. Expression of TRAIL receptors' mRNA in GBC was analysed through reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and protein through western blotting, immunohistochemistry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). mRNA data show frequent higher expression of TRAIL receptors in GBC samples. Death receptors DR4 and DR5 showed significant negative correlation with tumour stage, T stage and tumour grade; DcR1 transcript showed positive correlation with tumour stage, N stage, M stage and tumour grade. Similarly, IHC showed frequent positive staining for DR4, DR5 and DcR1in GBC samples. Cytoplasmic and nuclear DR4 protein showed negative correlation with T stage and tumour grade, whereas cytoplasmic DcR1 protein showed positive correlation with tumour stage and N stage. Nuclear DcR1 showed positive correlation with N stage. ELISA results showed significantly higher expression of secretory DcR1 in GBC patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly decreased mean survival of patients with positive staining of cytoplasmic DcR1. High level of death receptors identified the patients with early gallbladder cancer, whereas high DcR1 expression served as a prognostic factor for poor outcome.

miR-125b suppresses cellular proliferation by targeting c-FLIP in gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most common malignant tumor of the biliary tract. The incidence rate of gallbladder cancer ranks sixth among gastrointestinal types of cancer, and its incidence is increasing each year. Further clarification of the pathogenesis of GBC is essential, and identification of novel effective treatments is required. It has been previously demonstrated that high expression of the anti-apoptotic protein cellular Fas-associated death domain-like interleukin-1-converting enzyme inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) in GBC inhibited apoptosis in gallbladder cancer cells. In subsequent experiments, it was observed that microRNA (miR)-125b could target c-FLIP and inhibit the protein expression of c-FLIP by binding to the 3'untranslated regions of c-FLIP mRNA. In addition, the expression of miR-125b in GBC was significantly decreased, and the growth of gallbladder cancer cells was inhibited by the overexpression of miR-125b. The present study demonstrated that miR-125b could suppress the proliferation of gallbladder cancer cells by targeting c-FLIP. c-FLIP enriched the target gene pathway of miR-125b and may serve as a novel target for the treatment of GBC.

Comparison of FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy with Other Regimens in Patients with Biliary Tract Cancers: a Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the different treatment options of patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) who were treated with platinum-gemcitabine (CG) or platinum-5-fluorouracil (CF) or 5-Fluorouracil-oxaliplatin-irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) chemotherapy.

METHODS

We included the patients with advanced BTC who were registered at the Department of Oncology in Gaziantep University between January 2008 and January 2016. The following data were analyzed: disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) of first and second-line of chemotherapy, and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test was used to compare two survival curves, and hazard regression model was used to evaluate risk factors for PFS.

RESULT

Ninety-two patients were recruited. 53 (57.6 %), 27 (29.3 %), and 12 (13 %) patients received CG, CF, and FOLFIRINOX regimen as first-line chemotherapy, respectively. Median PFS and DCR of CG group were 22 weeks and 56.6 %, and these were 12 weeks and 44.4 % for CF group, and 9 weeks and 41.7 % for FOLFIRINOX group. Median OS of CG, CF, and FOLFIRINOX groups was 28, 21,and 23.5 weeks, respectively (p = 0.497). Second-line PFS of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy group and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy group was 12 vs. 14 weeks (p = 0.988). Second-line PFS of FOLFIRINOX was 20 weeks, whereas it was 14 weeks for other fuoropyrimidine-based chemotherapies (p = 0.190).

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study evaluating the FOLFIRINOX regimen in BTC. Cisplatin-gemcitabine therapy still provides better survival in BCT. However, FOLFIRINOX can be an option in the second-line treatment of BTC patients who are eligible for chemotherapy.

Gemcitabine and capecitabine for advanced biliary cancer

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine with capecitabine (gem-cap) is an established regimen for advanced biliary cancer (ABC) supported by our previously reported phase II trial. Here, we provide our updated experience.

METHODS

Single institution, retrospective study from 2005 to 2015 of ABC treated with gem-cap.

RESULTS

A total of 372 patients with ABC were identified, of whom 227 (61.0%) were treated with chemotherapy. 153 patients (67.4%) received gem-cap, of which 129 (56.8%) received it in the first line. Thirty two point six percent (42/129) were locally advanced, 67.4% (87/129) had metastatic disease, and 18.6% (24/129) received it as adjuvant therapy. Disease sites included 48.8% [63] intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), 24.0% [31] extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) and 27.1% [35] gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Median follow-up was 49.7 months (mo). The median PFS and OS were 8.0 mo [95% confidence intervals (CI): 6.0-9.3] and 13.0 mo (95% CI: 10.7-17.4), respectively. Overall, 53.5% (69/129) experienced a grade 3/4 toxicity. The most common (35.7%) was a hematologic toxicity (neutropenia or thrombocytopenia) followed by infection (25.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gem-cap provides similar survival outcomes to gemcitabine/cisplatin based on historical comparison to the ABC-2 trial (median PFS =8.0 mo and OS =11.7 mo). Gem-cap may offer the advantage of fewer adverse events compared to the levels reported in ABC-2 (grade 3/4 events 70.7%).

Doval D. Gemcitabine and cisplatin in inoperable, loco-regionally advanced and metastatic gallbladder cancer: A study from Northern India cancer institute

Aims: The primary objective of this study was to determine the response rates of the gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in treatment naive patients with inoperable gall bladder cancer. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the toxicity, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Materials and Methods: Treatment naive patients with histologically proven inoperable gallbladder cancer treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy between March 2010 and December 2014 were included in this retrospective study. The dose of gemcitabine and cisplatin was 1 g/m2 on day 1 and 8, and 75 mg/m2 on day 1, in a 21-day cycle respectively. Computed tomography scan was used for response assessment. Results: There were 32 men and 59 women with a median age of 52 years (range 30–67 years). Of the 91 patients, 9 (9.9%) patients achieved a complete response and 41 (45.1%) patients achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 55%. The median number of chemotherapy cycles administered were 6 (range 1–9). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 5.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9–7.9 months], with one year survival rate of 34.1%. Common toxicity criteria grade 3 or 4 anemia was seen in 4 (4.4%) and 2 (2.2%) patients respectively. Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was observed in 10 (10.9%) and 9 (9.9%) patients respectively. Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is active in advanced gallbladder carcinoma with mild toxicity.

Cholangiocarcinoma

Biliary tract cancer accounts for <1% of all cancers and affects chiefly an elderly population, with predominance in men. We distinguish cholangiocarcinoma (intrahepatic, hilar and distal) and gallbladder cancer, with different pathogenesis and prognosis. The treatment is based on surgery (whenever possible), radiotherapy in selected cases, and chemotherapy. The standard cytotoxic treatment for advanced/metastatic disease is represented by the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin, whereas fluoropyrimidines are generally administered in second line setting. At the present time, no biologic drug demonstrated a clear efficacy in this cancer, although the molecular characterisation could provide a promising basis for experimental treatments. A good supportive care and an early palliative care are warranted in most patients and should be delivered as a part of a global approach.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gallbladder cancer

AIM

Surgery is the only curative option for patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC). This study looks at the outcome of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

PATIENTS & METHODS

This is retrospective analysis of the prospectively maintained database of patients with locally advanced GBC treated between February 2009 and September 2013 with NACT. Patients received gemcitabine-platinum based regimen.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients (median age: 54 years, 64.9% females) received NACT. Overall response rate was 67.5%. In total, 17 patients (46%) underwent R0 resection. Median overall survival/progression-free survival of the whole group was 13.4/8.1 months, respectively. Patients who underwent surgery had a significantly better overall survival (median not reached vs 9.5 months) and progression-free survival (25.8 vs 5.6 months), respectively.

CONCLUSION

NACT increases resectability and survival in patients with locally advanced GBC.

Gallbladder Cancer in the 21st Century

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an uncommon disease in the majority of the world despite being the most common and aggressive malignancy of the biliary tree. Early diagnosis is essential for improved prognosis; however, indolent and nonspecific clinical presentations with a paucity of pathognomonic/predictive radiological features often preclude accurate identification of GBC at an early stage. As such, GBC remains a highly lethal disease, with only 10% of all patients presenting at a stage amenable to surgical resection. Among this select population, continued improvements in survival during the 21st century are attributable to aggressive radical surgery with improved surgical techniques. This paper reviews the current available literature of the 21st century on PubMed and Medline to provide a detailed summary of the epidemiology and risk factors, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, radiology, pathology, management, and prognosis of GBC.

Gallbladder cancer: expert consensus statement

An American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA)-sponsored consensus meeting of expert panellists was convened on 15 January 2014 to review current evidence on the management of gallbladder carcinoma in order to establish practice guidelines. In summary, within high incidence areas, the assessment of routine gallbladder specimens should include the microscopic evaluation of a minimum of three sections and the cystic duct margin; specimens with dysplasia or proven cancer should be extensively sampled. Provided the patient is medically fit for surgery, data support the resection of all gallbladder polyps of >1.0 cm in diameter and those with imaging evidence of vascular stalks. The minimum staging evaluation of patients with suspected or proven gallbladder cancer includes contrasted cross-sectional imaging and diagnostic laparoscopy. Adequate lymphadenectomy includes assessment of any suspicious regional nodes, evaluation of the aortocaval nodal basin, and a goal recovery of at least six nodes. Patients with confirmed metastases to N2 nodal stations do not benefit from radical resection and should receive systemic and/or palliative treatments. Primary resection of patients with early T-stage (T1b-2) disease should include en bloc resection of adjacent liver parenchyma. Patients with T1b, T2 or T3 disease that is incidentally identified in a cholecystectomy specimen should undergo re-resection unless this is contraindicated by advanced disease or poor performance status. Re-resection should include complete portal lymphadenectomy and bile duct resection only when needed to achieve a negative margin (R0) resection. Patients with preoperatively staged T3 or T4 N1 disease should be considered for clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Following R0 resection of T2-4 disease in N1 gallbladder cancer, patients should be considered for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy.

Bringing Patient-Centered Care to the Fore in Diseases of the Pancreas

Diseases of the pancreas are often very challenging for both patients and doctors as well as pose a considerable burden on healthcare system. Emerging evidence on the importance of shared-decision making in medicine stresses the need to integrate best clinical evidence and patient-reported outcomes to deliver optimal patient care. This paper argues that patient-centered care should no longer be a hermit in management of pancreatic diseases in the 21st century.

Surgical treatment of gallbladder cancer: Strategy and optimization

Gallbladder cancer is the most common malignant tumor of the biliary tract. It is difficult to diagnose early due to the lack of special symptoms and physical signs. Most cases are diagnosed in advanced stages and the response to traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy is extremely limited, with modest impact on overall survival. Despite improvements in outcome associated with extended resections, selection of patients for such extensive surgery remains controversial. In this article, we analyze and discuss the key issues about the surgical management of gallbladder cancer, with the hope of a more comprehensive recognition of this malignancy.

Identification of active chemotherapy regimens in advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a review of chemotherapy trials in the past two decades

Biliary tract carcinoma is a rare malignancy. We performed a comprehensive analysis of published prospective clinical trials in advanced biliary tract carcinoma in an attempt to identify active regimens in this setting. We searched PubMed and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium, European Society of Medical Oncology and European Cancer Organization conferences for clinical trials in this disease. We found 83 trials. The effect of gemcitabine on overall survival benefit showed a strong trend (p = 0.014) and an improvement in progression-free survival (p = 0.003). Gemcitabine-based regimens containing 5-fluorouracil showed a trend toward an improved overall survival (p = 0.047) relative to platinum agents. Our findings support gemcitabine as the chemotherapy backbone for the treatment of patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Gemcitabine plus 5-fluorouracil combinations warrant further investigations.

Can thymidine phosphorylase be a predictive marker for gemcitabine and doxifluridine combination chemotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma?: case series

Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma is poorly responded to chemotherapy, especially for the case refractory to gemcitabine and cisplatin. Here, we tested whether high expression of thymidine phosphorylase (TP) can be a predictive biomarker for the indicator for gemcitabine and doxifluridine combination chemotherapy in the cholangiocarcinoma refractory to gemcitabine and cisplatin. Immunohistochemical staining for TP was performed with a biopsy specimen. We accepted the result as positive when more than 10% of cancer cells were stained with moderate intensity. Here, we report 2 cases of TP-positive cholangiocarcinoma well controlled with gemcitabine and doxifluridine combination chemotherapy, which had been refractory to the first line treatment with gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for gall bladder cancer

Gall bladder cancer is a common cancer in the Ganges belt of North-eastern India. In view of incidental diagnosis of gall bladder cancer by physicians and surgeons, the treatment is not optimised. Most patients present in advanced stages and surgery remains the only option to cure. This review highlights the current evidence in advances in systemic therapy of gall bladder cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy for downstaging of locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is a rare but highly lethal type of cancer. A minority of patients present with resectable disease. Surgery remains the only treatment modality offering a chance of long-term survival. Unresectable patients are typically offered palliative treatment. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence for neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection in patients presenting with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Cochrane databases, Medline, PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched to identify articles describing neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection or re-assessment of resectability in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Included were all articles with original research. Study selection and data extraction were performed separately by two reviewers using a standardized protocol.

RESULTS

From 732 articles 8 full text articles and 2 abstracts met the inclusion criteria. The 2 abstracts and 1 full text article were case reports, 3 articles were retrospective and 4 were prospective studies (2 phase I and 2 phase II studies). Photodynamic therapy, chemotherapy and radiation therapy were used in various indications in populations that included patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, some of which were primarily unresectable. Overall quality of articles was limited.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that neoadjuvant therapy in patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma can be performed safely and in a selected group of patients can lead to subsequent surgical R0 resection. Surgical resection of downstaged patients should be assessed in properly designed phase II studies.

Cholangiocarcinoma: Biology, Clinical Management, and Pharmacological Perspectives

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), or tumor of the biliary tree, is a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies associated with a very poor prognosis. Depending on their localization along the biliary tree, CCAs are classified as intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal, and these subtypes are now considered different entities that differ in tumor biology, the staging system, management, and prognosis. When diagnosed, an evaluation by a multidisciplinary team is essential; the team must decide on the best therapeutic option. Surgical resection of tumors with negative margins is the best option for all subtypes of CCA, although this is only achieved in less than 50% of cases. Five-year survival rates have increased in the recent past owing to improvements in imaging techniques, which permits resectability to be predicted more accurately, and in surgery. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are relatively ineffective in treating nonoperable tumors and the resistance of CCA to these therapies is a major problem. Although the combination of gemcitabine plus platinum derivatives is the pharmacological treatment most widely used, to date there is no standard chemotherapy, and new combinations with targeted drugs are currently being tested in ongoing clinical trials. This review summarizes the biology, clinical management, and pharmacological perspectives of these complex tumors.

Capecitabine and Gemcitabine (CapGem, CG, GemCap) for Advanced Pancreatic and Biliary Tract Cancer

The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of antineoplastic therapy, and the agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.

Activated K-Ras and INK4a/Arf deficiency promote aggressiveness of pancreatic cancer by induction of EMT consistent with cancer stem cell phenotype

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, suggesting that there is an urgent need to design novel strategies for achieving better treatment outcome of patients diagnosed with PDAC. Our previous study has shown that activation of Notch and NF-κB play a critical role in the development of PDAC in the compound K-Ras(G12D) and Ink4a/Arf deficient transgenic mice. However, the exact molecular mechanism by which mutated K-Ras and Ink4a/Arf deficiency contribute to progression of PDAC remains largely elusive. In the present study, we used multiple methods, such as real-time RT-PCR, Western blotting assay, and immunohistochemistry to gain further mechanistic insight. We found that the deletion of Ink4a/Arf in K-Ras(G12D) expressing mice led to high expression of PDGF-D signaling pathway in the tumor and tumor-derived cell line (RInk-1 cells). Furthermore, PDGF-D knock-down in RInk-1 cells resulted in the inhibition of pancreatosphere formation and down-regulation of EZH2, CD44, EpCAM, and vimentin. Moreover, we demonstrated that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was induced in the compound mice, which is linked with aggressiveness of PDAC. In addition, we demonstrated that tumors from compound transgenic mice have higher expression of cancer stem cell (CSC) markers. These results suggest that the acquisition of EMT phenotype and induction of CSC characteristics could be linked with the aggressiveness of PDAC mediated in part through the activation of PDGF-D, signaling.

Gallbladder cancer: past, present and an uncertain future

Although gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract, its relatively low incidence and confounding symptomatology result in advanced disease at the time presentation, contributing to the poor prognosis and decreased survival associated with this disease. It is therefore increasingly important to understand its pathogenesis and risk factors to allow for the earliest possible diagnosis. To date, gallbladder cancer is poorly understood compared to other malignancies, and is still most commonly discovered incidentally after cholecystectomy. Moreover, while much is known about biliary neoplasms as a whole, understanding the clinical and molecular nuances of GBC as a separate disease process will prove a cornerstone in the development of early intervention, potential screening and overall more effective treatment strategies. The present work reviews the most current understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, staging and natural history of GBC, with additional focus on surgical treatment. Further, review of current adjuvant therapies for unresectable and advanced disease as well as prognostic factors provide fertile ground for the development of future studies which will hopefully improve treatment outcomes and affect overall survival for this highly morbid, poorly understood malignancy.

Biliary tract carcinomas: from chemotherapy to targeted therapy

Biliary tract carcinomas (BTC) are a group of tumours arising from the epithelial cells of intra- and extra-hepatic biliaryducts and the gallbladder, characterised by a poor prognosis. Surgery is the only curative procedure, but the risk of recurrence is high and furthermore, the majority of patients present with unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis. Systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for patients who present recurrent or metastatic disease. Progress has been made in the last decade to identify the most effective chemotherapy regimens, with the recent recommendation of the combination of gemcitabine-cisplatin as the standard schedule. Comprehension of the molecular basis of cholangiocarcinogenesis and tumour progression has recently led to the experimentation of targeted therapies in patients with BTC, demonstrating promising results. In this review we will discuss the clinical experience with systemic treatment for BTC, focusing on future directions with targeted therapies.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder cancer or cholangiocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group study S0202

PURPOSE

Patients with gallbladder cancer or cholangiocarcinoma were treated with the combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) IV over 100 min on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 650 mg/m(2) BID PO on days 1-14, administered every 21 days.

METHODS

The primary objective of this study was to assess the response rate (confirmed complete and partial responses) of gemcitabine and capecitabine used in advanced/metastatic biliary neoplasms. Secondary objectives included overall survival and toxicities.

RESULTS

The study accrued 57 patients from September 2003 to April 2005. Three patients were ineligible, and two others received no treatment. Characteristics of analyzable patients: 35 (67%) cholangiocarcinoma, 17 (33%) gallbladder cancer; PS 0 (18 pts), 1 (26 pts), 2 (8 pts); 26 (50%) men; median age 58.8 years (29.5-85.6). Among 51 patients evaluated for toxicity, 6 experienced grade 4 toxicities. Among 52 patients, there were 7 confirmed partial responses for a confirmed response probability of 13% (95% CI: 6-26%). Six patients had an unconfirmed partial response for an overall response probability of 25% (95% CI: 14-39%). Twelve patients (23%) demonstrated stable disease. The 6-month overall survival was 55% (95% CI: 41-69%), and median survival was 7 months (95% CI: 5-8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine is a well-tolerated regimen with activity in patients with advanced gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma.

A Phase I-II dose escalation study of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and capecitabine every two weeks in advanced cholangiocarcinomas

INTRODUCTION

Gemcitabine based regimens have been widely used in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CC), but no standard therapy exists. In this study we aimed to find the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of a two-week schedule of fixed dose rate (FDR) gemcitabine (G), oxaliplatin (O) and capecitabine (C), and evaluate the safety and efficacy of this regimen in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CC).

METHODS

In the Phase I part of the study a dose-escalation schedule of FDR G, O and C, administered every two weeks, was performed in patients with solid tumours and no other treatments or advanced CC. In the Phase II part response rate, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival was evaluated in patients with newly diagnosed advanced CC.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients entered the Phase I part and G 1 000 mg/m(2) day 1 and 15, O 60 mg/m(2) day 1 and 15, and C 1 000 mg/m(2) BID day 1-7 and day 15-21 were established as MTD. In the Phase II part, 41 patients with advanced CC were included. Overall response rate was 34% and 51% had stable disease, resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 85%. Grade III and IV adverse events were rare. Median survival was 12.5 months (95% CI 9.2-15.9) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.1-8.6).

CONCLUSIONS

This outpatient regimen was very feasible with significant activity and a favourable safety profile. Further studies will explore this combination with addition of newer targeted agents.

Surgical strategy for bile duct cancer: Advances and current limitations

The aim of this review is to describe recent advances and topics in the surgical management of bile duct cancer. Radical resection with a microscopically negative margin (R0) is the only way to cure cholangiocarcinoma and is associated with marked survival advantages compared to margin-positive resections. Complete resection of the tumor is the surgeon’s ultimate aim, and several advances in the surgical treatment for bile duct cancer have been made within the last two decades. Multidetector row computed tomography has emerged as an indispensable diagnostic modality for the precise preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer, in terms of both longitudinal and vertical tumor invasion. Many meticulous operative procedures have been established, especially extended hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, to achieve a negative resection margin, which is the only prognostic factor under the control of the surgeon. A complete caudate lobectomy and resection of the inferior part of Couinaud’s segment IV coupled with right or left hemihepatectomy has become the standard surgical procedure for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy is the first choice for distal bile duct cancer. Limited resection for middle bile duct cancer is indicated for only strictly selected cases. Preoperative treatments including biliary drainage and portal vein embolization are also indicated for only selected patients, especially jaundiced patients anticipating major hepatectomy. Liver transplantation seems ideal for complete resection of bile duct cancer, but the high recurrence rate and decreased patient survival after liver transplant preclude it from being considered standard treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy have a potentially crucial role in prolonging survival and controlling local recurrence, but no definite regimen has been established to date. Further evidence is needed to fully define the role of liver transplantation and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy.

Outcome of patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract or gallbladder carcinoma

PURPOSE

Patients with cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer have poor overall prognosis and their management is often complex. Currently, there is no standard chemotherapy for this disease, but several single agents and combinations have shown promising activity, most notably gemcitabine-based combinations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all cases of biliary tract cancer treated at two academic centers in Lyon, France: 127 cases were identified, 67 underwent primary surgery, 13 of which were deemed unresectable upon surgery and were treated medically; 60 patients received medical treatment only. Overall, 71 patients received chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease and are the subject of this report.

RESULTS

The median age was 60.7 years, 47 (66%) patients were male and 55 (77%) patients had metastatic disease. Twenty-seven patients (38%) required biliary drainage before chemotherapy. Twenty-four patients received single-agent gemcitabine, 37 patients received gemcitabine-platinum combination and 10 patients received fluorouracil-based regimens. The response rates, median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 24%, 4.1, 7.5 months, respectively. There was a significant increase in the response rate with gemcitabine-platinum combinations compared with other regimens. Fluororuracil-based regimens provided lower response rates and shorter median progression-free survival and overall survival as compared with gemcitabine-based regimens (both single agents and combinations).

CONCLUSION

Although retrospective, these data support the use of gemcitabine-containing regimens in patients with advanced biliary tract or gallbladder cancer. The benefit of adding oxaliplatin in this setting remains unclear.

Genetics of biliary tract cancers and emerging targeted therapies

Biliary tract cancers (BTC), which encompass intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and gallbladder carcinomas, are a genetically diverse collection of cancers. Evidence suggests distinct models of molecular and pathologic progression, and a growing body of genetics data points to a heterogeneous collection of underlying mutations in key oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Although tumor genetics have been used to tailor individual treatment regimens and guide clinical decision making in other cancers, these principles have not been applied in BTC. Recent clinical trials with targeted therapies seem promising, although the relationships between subsets of patients with positive responses to therapy and tumor genetics remain unexplored. Here, we summarize the molecular pathogenesis and genetics of BTCs and animal modeling and relate these to recent and ongoing clinical trials with targeted agents.

A successful treatment by hepatic arterial infusion therapy for advanced, unresectable biliary tract cancer

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are relatively rare tumors, and the prognosis is extremely poor. There has been no standard chemotherapy for advanced BTC. However, recently, gemcitabine (GEM) have been used against BTC as the most active agent, and promising response rates and overall survival times with tolerable drug toxicities have been observed. In this article, two cases of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and unresectable metastatic gallbladder (GB) cancer are reported. They were treated with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy using a combination of GEM and cisplatin, along with the systemic administration of GEM. As a consequence, multiple liver tumors, the GB cancer and metastatic lymph nodes regressed without severe drug toxicities, and favorable results (the overall survival times were 16 and 14 mo, respectively) were achieved. In conclusion, HAI therapy using GEM combined with cisplatin may be a useful and well-tolerated option for advanced BTC, especially in cases where multiple liver metastases are detected.

Depth of invasion determines the postresectional prognosis for patients with T1 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

We tested the hypothesis that in patients with T1 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC), prognosis postresection is significantly different for those with tumors that are limited to the mucosa than for those with tumors that have invaded (but not penetrated) the fibromuscular layer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 33 consecutive patients with pathologic T1 (pT1) EHC tumors. According to the depth of invasion, the pT1 tumors were divided into 2 groups: Group 1, tumors that were limited to the mucosa (mucosal tumors); and Group 2, tumors that had invaded (but not penetrated) the fibromuscular layer (fibromuscular layer-invasive tumors). Long-term outcomes after resection were compared between the 2 groups for a median follow-up time of 175 months.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients had mucosal tumors and 15 patients had tumors that had invaded the fibromuscular layer. None of the patients with mucosal tumors had lymphovascular invasion, whereas 3 of the patients with fibromuscular layer-invasive tumors had lymphovascular invasion (P = .083). Overall survival after resection was better in Group 1 than in Group 2 (cumulative 10-year survival rate, 100% vs 52%; P = .024). The rate of disease-free survival after resection was higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (cumulative disease-free 10-year survival rate, 100% vs 56%; P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term outcome after resection for EHC is significantly better for patients with mucosal tumors than for patients with fibromuscular layer-invasive tumors. This suggests that the depth of tumor invasion affects the postresection prognosis for patients with pT1 EHC.

Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental gallbladder carcinoma: analysis of the database of the Swiss association of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the long-term survival of patients with incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC). The role of radical resection for this disease is discussed controversially in the literature. We present the long-term survival and the results of re-resection versus simple cholecystectomy of the database of the Swiss Association for Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS) from 1994 to 2004.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma of the gallbladder were identified out of 30,960 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixty-nine patients were included in our study. Long-term survival by different T-stage and comparison of patients with extended resection versus simple cholecystectomy were calculated using the log-rank test. The time-to-event data are demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of IGBC in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 0.28% (89 of 30,960). Fifty patients underwent simple cholecystectomy [n = 2: carcinoma in situ (CIS); n = 2: pT1a; n = 10: pT1b; n = 23: pT2; n = 8: pT3; n = 5: pT4], whereas extended resection was performed in 19 cases (n = 2: pT1b; n = 11: pT2; n = 6: pT3). The comparison of simple cholecystectomy versus extended re-resection of the gallbladder bed and regional lymph node resections showed a significant benefit in overall survival for the pT2 and pT3 group (p < 0.05). The pT1b group showed no significant benefit in overall survival (p = 0.34).

CONCLUSION

IGBC has a low incidence (0.28%). We present a large study of patients with IGBC, comparing the overall survival by different histological findings. We observed a significant benefit for the group with pT2 and pT3. Therefore we recommend extended resection of the gallbladder bed and the regional lymph nodes for patient with incidental histologically confirmed pT2 and pT3 carcinoma of the gallbladder after performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For patients with pT1b stage no recommendations can be given based on this study.

Current management of gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) represents the most common and aggressive type among the biliary tree cancers (BTCs). Complete surgical resection offers the only chance for cure; however, only 10% of patients with GBC present with early-stage disease and are considered surgical candidates. Among those patients who do undergo "curative" resection, recurrence rates are high. There are no established adjuvant treatments in this setting. Patients with unresectable or metastatic GBC have a poor prognosis. There has been a paucity of randomized phase III data in this field. A recent report demonstrated longer overall survival with gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin than with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs. Molecularly targeted agents are under development. In this review, we attempt to discuss the current status and key issues involved in the management of GBC.

Number of positive lymph nodes independently determines the prognosis after resection in patients with gallbladder carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to compare the prognostic power of the location of positive lymph nodes with that of the number of positive lymph nodes in gallbladder carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 116 consecutive patients who underwent an R0 radical resection for gallbladder carcinoma. A total of 2,406 lymph nodes taken from the patients were examined histologically. The location of positive regional nodes was classified according to the Japanese staging system. The number of positive regional nodes was recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

Nodal disease was found in 49 patients, of whom 19 survived for more than 5 years after resection. Univariate analysis revealed that both the location (P < 0.0001) and the number (P < 0.0001) of positive nodes were significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of positive nodes was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.001), whereas the location of positive nodes failed to remain as an independent variable. The cumulative 5-year survival rates were 81% for patients without regional nodal disease, 62% for patients with a single positive node, 43% for patients with 2-3 positive nodes, and 15% for patients with > or =4 positive nodes (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The number, not the location, of positive lymph nodes independently determines the prognosis after resection in gallbladder carcinoma. No nodal disease or a single positive node indicates a favorable outcome after resection, whereas radical lymph node dissection is effective for selected patients with multiple positive nodes, provided that an R0 resection is feasible.

Sorafenib in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Advanced biliary tract carcinoma has a very poor prognosis, with chemotherapy being the mainstay of treatment. Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2/-3, PDGFR-beta, B-Raf, and C-Raf, has shown to be active in preclinical models of cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

We conducted a phase II trial of single-agent sorafenib in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma. Sorafenib was administered at a dose of 400 mg twice a day. The primary end point was the disease control rate at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were treated. In all, 26 (56%) had received chemotherapy earlier, and 36 patients completed at least 45 days of treatment. In intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response was 2% and the disease control rate at 12 weeks was 32.6%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months (range: 0-12 months), and the median overall survival was 4.4 months (range: 0-22 months). Performance status was significantly related to PFS: median PFS values for ECOG 0 and 1 were 5.7 and 2.1 months, respectively (P=0.0002). The most common toxicities were skin rash (35%) and fatigue (33%), requiring a dose reduction in 22% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib as a single agent has a low activity in cholangiocarcinoma. Patients having a good performance status have a better PFS. The toxicity profile is manageable.

Indications for neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative chemotherapy in the treatment of biliary tract cancers

Advanced biliary tract carcinomas represent a group of aggressive diseases that still carries a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy has been shown to provide disease control and may also prolong survival. An established role for systemic therapy in the adjuvant setting is still lacking. This article reviews the available evidence to support indications of systemic chemotherapy in the palliative setting and discuss the attempts to study it in the perioperative settings.

Over-expression of c-FLIP confers the resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis on gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is an aggressive malignancy with high mortality, mainly due to the reduced chance of curative resection and the resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. Here, we showed that cellular Fas-associated death domain-like interleukin-1 converting enzyme inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), an anti-apoptotic protein, was over-expressed in the most of gallbladder carcinoma tissues, as judged by immunohistochemistry. Semi-quantitation was performed by determining the percentage of c-FLIP-positive cells: no positive cells (-), approximately 1% positive cells (+), approximately 30% positive cells (++), and >70% positive cells (+++). Out of the 35 tissue specimens of gallbladder carcinoma, positive c-FLIP expression was found in 26 samples (6/positive+++, 13/++, 7/+), whereas negative or weak c-FLIP staining was detected in normal (1/+, 9/-) and adenomatous (2/+, 8/-) gallbladder tissues. Then, we used a small interference RNA (siRNA), which can substantially down-regulate the expression levels of c-FLIP mRNA and protein in GBC-SD and SGC-996 human gallbladder carcinoma cells, as confirmed by real-time PCR and western blot analyses. Furthermore, the combined treatment with the c-FLIP siRNA and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) significantly induced apoptosis in gallbladder carcinoma cells, as judged by the increases in pyknosis, caspase-3/7 activities, and Annexin V-propidium iodide labeling, a marker for chromatin condensation. Thus, the siRNA-mediated down-regulation of c-FLIP profoundly enhances the sensitivity to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In conclusion, c-FLIP expression is up-regulated in gallbladder carcinoma and the down-regulation of c-FLIP sensitizes TRAIL-induced apoptosis. The present study provides a potent strategy for the treatment of gallbladder carcinoma by targeting the c-FLIP.

Gemcitabine and Capecitabine (GemCap) Regimen for Solid Tumors

The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires that pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparing, dispensing, and administering antineoplastic therapy and to the agents, commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.

Operations for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: single-institution experience of 158 patients

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare primary liver malignancy. Until now, outcomes and prognostic factors after liver resection for these tumors have not been well-documented.

STUDY DESIGN

Between April 1998 and December 2006, a total of 158 patients underwent surgical exploration in our institution for intended liver resection of ICC. Prospectively collected data of patients undergoing liver resection (n = 83) were analyzed with regard to preoperative findings, operative details, perioperative morbidity and mortality, pathologic findings, outcomes measured by tumor recurrence and survival, and prognostic factors for outcomes.

RESULTS

Tumors were solitary in 47 patients. R0 resections were achieved in 53 patients. Vascular infiltration and lymph node metastasis were detected in 41% and 34%, respectively. After resection, the calculated 1-, 3-, and 5-year-survival rates were 71%, 38%, and 21%, respectively, with corresponding rates of 83%, 50%, and 30% in R0 resections. For 14 variables evaluated, only gender (p = 0.008), Union Internationale Contre le Cancer stage (p = 0.014), and R classification (p = 0.001) showed predictive value in the multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Results presented outline that an R0 resection leads to substantially prolonged survival in ICC and represents the considerable input of the surgeon to the outcomes of these patients. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer stage remains an important factor.

Gallbladder cancer: a morphological and molecular update

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) shows a marked geographical variation in its incidence, with the highest figures being seen in India and Chile and relatively low levels in many Western countries. Risk factors for its development include the presence of gallstones, infection and the presence of an anomalous pancreatobiliary ductal junction. It can arise from either a pathway involving metaplasia or dysplasia or one in which there is a pre-existing adenoma. The former is the more common and, because it is often not associated with a macroscopically recognizable lesion, leads to the recommendation that all gallbladders need to be examined microscopically. Accurate staging of invasive cancers is essential to determine prognosis and treatment, and this requires extensive tumour sampling. A number of genetic alterations have been identified in the preinvasive and invasive stages of GBC and they support the morphological evidence of there being two pathways by which tumours develop. Some of these genetic changes are associated with particular risk factors. For example, cases with anomalous pancreatobiliary ductal junction show a higher frequency of K-ras mutations. Some changes are associated with differences in prognosis. For example, cancers without expression of p21 but with expression for p27 have a better prognosis, whereas those that express c-erb-B2 have a worse one. Work has also been done on identifying clinical, imaging and other factors that indicate that patients have a higher risk of having GBC. This is particularly important in high-incidence areas in which GBC is a significant public health problem.

The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in the treatment of extrahepatic bile duct cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) population-based investigation

PURPOSE

Extrahepatic bile duct cancers (EBDC) are aggressive cancers for which the importance of the use of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in potentially curative cases remains the subject of clinical investigation.

METHODS

The 1973-2004 National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was analyzed for patients with EBDC who had undergone cancer-directed surgery. Patients who died <3 months after surgery were excluded from analysis. Patients with distant metastases, with unknown stage or interventions, or benign histologies were excluded.

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifty-six patients were selected. Tumor-related factors, such as regional (vs. local) disease and an increasing number of lymph nodes predicted for the delivery of PORT. In unadjusted univariate analysis, patients treated from 1973 to 2004 who fit the selection criteria had a lower 3-year survival rate if they received PORT vs. no PORT (3 year survival 31.3% vs. 39.6%, p = 0.04), but this improvement did not hold in multivariate survival analysis or in univariate analysis of patient subsets.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on analysis of the SEER database, there was no definitive evidence for improved survival with the addition of PORT to radical surgery. This analysis should be approached with caution given its observational and retrospective nature. In addition, it should be remembered that the SEER database lacks information on the use of chemotherapy, radiation technique, and the completeness of resection.

Management of bile duct tumors

Cholangiocarcinomas are a rare but highly fatal disease. The only curative treatment is radical surgical resection of the tumor and the regional lymph nodes. More than half of patients have irresectable disease, which implicates a median survival of < 1 year. The mainstay of palliative treatment is endoscopic or percutaneous drainage of the biliary system. In patients with good performance status, palliative chemotherapy seems to provide some survival benefit together with an improved quality of life. No standard chemotherapy has been defined but gemcitabine monotherapy or the combination of gemcitabine with platin derivates or capecitabine seems to be more effective than other protocols. Additionally, photodynamic therapy has shown promising results and radiation might be helpful for localized disease. In a very selected population liver transplantation can also be an option.

Adjuvant therapy for resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a review of the literature and future directions

Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare neoplasm originating from the intra- or extrahepatic bile duct epithelium. Incidence has been increasing worldwide in the last three decades. Complete surgical resection provides the only possibility of cure, but even with resection 5-yr survival can be as low as 11%. Adjuvant therapy has the potential to play a crucial role in prolonging survival and local control. Retrospective series have suggested benefit to adjuvant radiation, chemotherapy or concurrent chemo-radiation. The scarce prospective data has not shown a survival benefit to adjuvant therapy. In this article we review and summarize the published data regarding adjuvant therapy for resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Prospective, multi-institutional randomized trials are needed to clarify the role of adjuvant therapy in this disease.