Management of Intraductal Papilloma of the Breast Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy: Latest Controversies

Intraductal papillomas (IDPs), including central papilloma and peripheral papilloma, are common in the female population. Due to the lack of specific clinical manifestations of IDPs, it is easy to misdiagnose or miss diagnose. The difficulty of differential diagnosis using imaging techniques also contributes to these conditions. Histopathology is the gold standard for the diagnosis of IDPs while the possibility of under sample exists in the percutaneous biopsy. There have been some debates about how to treat asymptomatic IDPs without atypia diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB), especially when the upgrade rate to carcinoma is considered. This article concludes that further surgery is recommended for IDPs without atypia diagnosed on CNB who have high-risk factors, while appropriate imaging follow-up may be suitable for those without risk factors.

Contributions of nanotechnology to the intraductal drug delivery for local treatment and prevention of breast cancer

Breast cancer is a major public health problem, affecting millions of people. It is a very heterogeneous disease, with localized and invasive forms, and treatment generally consists of a combination of surgery and radiotherapy followed by administration of estrogen receptor modulators or aromatase inhibitors. Given its heterogeneity, management strategies that take into consideration the type of disease and biological markers and can provide more personalized and local treatment are required. More recently, the intraductal administration (i.e., into the breast ducts) of drugs has attracted significant attention due to its ability of providing drug distribution through the ductal tree in a minimally invasive manner. Although promising, intraductal administration is not trivial, and difficulties in duct identification and cannulation are important challenges to the further development of this route. New drug delivery strategies such as nanostructured systems can help to achieve the full benefits of the route due to the possibility of prolonging tissue retention, improving targeting and selectivity, increasing cytotoxicity and reducing the frequency of administration. This review aims at discussing the potential benefits and challenges of intraductal administration, focusing on the design and use of nanocarriers as innovative and feasible strategies for local breast cancer therapy and prevention.

Evaluation and management of pathological nipple discharges without using intraductal imaging methods

BACKGROUND

The most common cause of pathological nipple discharge (PND) is single papilloma, which is a benign intraductal lesion (BIL). However, underlying malign (MIL) or high-risk intraductal lesions (HIL) should be considered during examination.

AIM

To reveal the value of conventional imaging methods (CIM), discharge characteristics, and cytology in lack of intraductal imaging methods to detect intraductal lesions (IL) and MIL that cause PND.

METHODS

We compared the pathological findings with the characteristics of discharge, CIM, and cytology findings of the patients who admitted to our clinic with nipple discharge and underwent duct excision (n = 111).

RESULTS

IL were detected in 69 (62.2%) patients as BIL (n = 31), HIL (n = 23), and MIL (n = 15). Most of the IL was observed with bloody, serosanguineous, and serous discharges (83.3%, 76.2%, and 69.2%, respectively). The sensitivities of ultrasonography, MRI, and cytology in detecting IL were found to be 50.7%, 42.6%, and 74.1%, while their specificities were found to be 73.8%, 88.2%, and 48.6%, respectively. None of the CIM was sufficient to detect MIL in 5 (33.3%) patients. The appearance of red blood cells detailed in cytology was significantly related to IL (p < 0.01), whereas the presence of inflammatory cells was related to ductal ectasia and periductal mastitis (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients' physical examinations, CIM, and cytology findings were normal, duct excision procedures should be applied to exclude MIL or HIL, which can be a cause of discharge in case of suspicious color. The details in cytology reports have a role in increasing the value of cytology.

Nipple discharge: The state of the art

Over 80% of females experience nipple discharge during their life. Differently from lactational (milk production) and physiological (white, green, or yellow), which are usually bilateral and involving multiple ducts, pathologic nipple discharge (PND) is a spontaneous commonly single-duct and unilateral, clear, serous, or bloody secretion. Mostly caused by intraductal papilloma(s) or ductal ectasia, in 5-33% of cases is due to an underlying malignancy. After clinical history and physical examination, mammography is the first step after 39, but its sensitivity is low (7-26%). Ultrasound shows higher sensitivity (63-100%). Nipple discharge cytology is limited by a false negative rate over 50%. Galactography is an invasive technique that may cause discomfort and pain; it can be performed only when the duct discharge is demonstrated at the time of the study, with incomplete/failed examination rate up to 15% and a difficult differentiation between malignant and benign lesions. Ductoscopy, performed under local anesthesia in outpatients, provides a direct visualization of intraductal lesions, allowing for directed excision and facilitating a targeted surgery. Its sensitivity reaches 94%; however, it is available in only few centers and most clinicians are unfamiliar with its use. PND has recently emerged as a new indication for contrast-enhanced breast MRI, showing sensitivity superior to galactography, with an overall sensitivity up to 96%, also allowing tailored surgery. Surgery no longer can be considered the standard approach to PND. We propose a state-of-the art flowchart for the management of nipple discharge, including ductoscopy and breast MRI as best options.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Evaluation of Nipple Discharge

Appropriate imaging evaluation of nipple discharge depends the nature of the discharge. Imaging is not indicated for women with physiologic nipple discharge. For evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge, multiple breast imaging modalities are rated for evidence-based appropriateness under various scenarios. For women age 40 or older, mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) should be the initial examination. Ultrasound is usually added as a complementary examination, with some exceptions. For women age 30 to 39, either mammogram or ultrasound may be used as the initial examination on the basis of institutional preference. For women age 30 or younger, ultrasound should be the initial examination, with mammography/DBT added when ultrasound shows suspicious findings or if the patient is predisposed to developing breast cancer. For men age 25 or older, mammography/DBT should be performed initially, with ultrasound added as indicated, given the high incidence of breast cancer in men with pathologic nipple discharge. Although MRI and ductography are not usually appropriate as initial examinations, each may be useful when the initial standard imaging evaluation is negative. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Bioinformatics analysis of dysregulated microRNAs in the nipple discharge of patients with breast cancer

MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) have been reported to be associated with the tumorigenesis and progression of various types of human cancer; however, the underlying mechanisms of this association remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to explore the potential functions of miRNAs in the development of breast cancer using bioinformatics analysis, based on the miRNA expression profile in nipple discharge. A previous study demonstrated the upregulation of miR-3646 and miR-4484, and the downregulation of miR-4732-5p in the nipple discharge of patients with breast cancer, compared with patients with benign breast lesions. In the present study, the target genes of miR-3646, −4484 and −4732-5p were predicted using TargetScan and the MicroRNA Target Prediction and Functional Study Database. The predicted target genes were further analyzed by Gene Ontology term enrichment analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction analysis. Numerous carcinoma-associated genes, including ADIPOQ, CPEB1, DNAJB4, EIF4E, APP and BCLAF1, were revealed to be putative targets of miR-3646, −4484 and −4732-5p. Bioinformatics analysis associated miR-3646 with the Rap1 and TGF-β signaling pathways, miR-4484 with the ErbB, estrogen and focal adhesion signaling pathways, and miR-4732-5p with the proteoglycan signaling pathway. Notably, protein-protein interaction analysis identified that numerous predicted targets of these miRNAs were associated with one other. In addition, the target genes of the miRNAs were identified to be under the regulation of a number of transcription factors (TFs). The predicted target genes of miR-3646, −4484 and −4732-5p were identified to serve a role in cancer-associated signaling pathways and TF-mRNA networks, indicating that they serve a role in breast carcinogenesis and progression. These results provide a comprehensive view of the functions and molecular mechanisms of miR-3646, −4484 and −4732-5p, and will aid in future studies.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ductoscopy in patients with pathological nipple discharge

Background

Invasive surgery remains the standard for diagnosis of pathological nipple discharge (PND). Only a minority of patients with nipple discharge and an unsuspicious finding on conventional breast imaging have cancer. Ductoscopy is a minimally invasive alternative for evaluation of PND. This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ductoscopy in patients with PND.

Methods

A systematic search of electronic databases for studies addressing ductoscopy in patients with PND was conducted. Two classification systems were assessed. For DSany, all visualized ductoscopic abnormalities were classified as positive, whereas for DSsusp, only suspicious findings were considered positive. After checking heterogeneity, pooled sensitivity and specificity of DSany and DSsusp were calculated.

Results

The search yielded 4642 original citations, of which 20 studies were included in the review. Malignancy rates varied from 0 to 27 per cent. Twelve studies, including 1994 patients, were eligible for meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of DSany were 94 (95 per cent c.i. 88 to 97) per cent and 47 (44 to 49) per cent respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of DSsusp were 50 (36 to 64) and 83 (81 to 86) per cent respectively. Heterogeneity between studies was moderate to large for sensitivity (DSany: I2 = 17·5 per cent; DSsusp: I2 = 37·9 per cent) and very large for specificity (DSany: I2 = 96·8 per cent; DSsusp: I2 = 92·6 per cent).

Conclusion

Ductoscopy detects about 94 per cent of all underlying malignancies in patients with PND, but does not permit reliable discrimination between malignant and benign findings.

Does Nipple Discharge Color Predict (pre-) Malignant Breast Pathology?

Unilateral single-duct nipple discharge is associated with an increased risk for underlying breast malignancy. There is no consensus whether color of nipple discharge independently indicates the risk of malignancy. We sought to assess the relationship between the color of discharge and the risk of malignancy. Patients with unilateral single-duct nipple discharge without abnormalities on clinical and radiologic examination were included. Prior to diagnostic microdochectomy nipple discharge characteristics were registered. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to assess the relationship between color of nipple discharge and malignancy, corrected for age. During a mean follow-up period of 7.1 years we determined complication rate and false-negative rate of microdochectomy. A total of 184 patients were included (median age 53 years, range 19-84). Histologic examination revealed (in situ or invasive) breast carcinoma in 10.9% (20) of patients and high-risk lesions in 11.4% (21). Malignancy or high-risk lesions were found in 25% (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.62-3.00) of patients with bloody discharge. Risk of underlying malignancy increased in patients >60 years (OR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.14-4.83). Complication rate of microdochectomy was 2.7%. Single-duct, unilateral nipple discharge is a sign of underlying malignancy in a substantial proportion of cases. The majority of patients with unilateral single-duct nipple discharge, diagnosed with breast cancer, present with bloody discharge. However, the association between bloody nipple discharge and malignancy is not strong enough to distinguish high-risk patients. Therefore, invasive diagnostic procedures like microdochectomy should be offered to all patients with unilateral uniductal nipple discharge to search for underlying malignancy.

[Minimally invasive breast surgery]

Due to the development in medical science and industrial technology, minimally invasive procedures have appeared in the surgery of benign and malignant breast diseases. In general , such interventions result in significantly reduced breast and chest wall scars, shorter hospitalization and less pain, but they require specific, expensive devices, longer surgical time compared to open surgery. Furthermore, indications or oncological safety have not been established yet. It is quite likely, that minimally invasive surgical procedures with high-tech devices - similar to other surgical subspecialties -, will gradually become popular and it may form part of routine breast surgery even. Vacuum-assisted core biopsy with a therapeutic indication is suitable for the removal of benign fibroadenomas leaving behind an almost invisible scar, while endoscopically assisted skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy, axillary staging and reconstruction with latissimus dorsi muscle flap are all feasible through the same short axillary incision. Endoscopic techniques are also suitable for the diagnostics and treatment of intracapsular complications of implant-based breast reconstructions (intracapsular fluid, implant rupture, capsular contracture) and for the biopsy of intracapsular lesions with uncertain pathology. Perception of the role of radiofrequency ablation of breast tumors requires further hands-on experience, but it is likely that it can serve as a replacement of surgical removal in a portion of primary tumors in the future due to the development in functional imaging and anticancer drugs. With the reduction of the price of ductoscopes routine examination of the ductal branch system, guided microdochectomy and targeted surgical removal of terminal ducto-lobular units or a "sick lobe" as an anatomical unit may become feasible. The paper presents the experience of the authors and provides a literature review, for the first time in Hungarian language on the subject. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(5), 162-169.

Comparison of ductoscopy, galactography, and imaging modalities for the evaluation of intraductal lesions: a critical review

BACKGROUND

Today, in cases of nipple discharge of unclear origin, the abundance of diagnostic procedures - a, diagnostic dilemma' - becomes apparent, because unequivocal indications and a current, standardized examination sequence are presently not available. The diagnostic workup of patients with nipple discharge usually includes the clinical history, physical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, galactography, and nipple discharge cytology, but not ductoscopy.

METHODS

In this review we analyze and discuss the possible role of ductoscopy in evaluating intraductal pathologies and its combined use with diagnostic imaging modalities. For this purpose, we reviewed and compared the results of the radiological, pathological, and surgical studies independently.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is no solitary accurate modality to reach our definitive purpose. Being aware of the capability of each diagnostic modality may take us closer to our target. Therefore, adjunct and appropriate use of multiple imaging modalities and ductoscopy is necessary to evaluate patients with nipple discharge.

The diagnostic value of nipple discharge cytology: breast imaging complements predictive value of nipple discharge cytology

BACKGROUND

Papilloma is the most common finding associated with pathologic nipple discharge. In the absence of breast imaging abnormalities, the incidence of occult malignancy is <3%.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the predictive value of nipple discharge cytology in conjunction with breast imaging.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 160 charts; inclusion criteria of clinically pathologic nipple discharge, subsequent excisional biopsy, and absence of palpable abnormalities. Nipple discharge cytology categorized as negative, atypical, suspicious, and papillary. Breast imaging was analyzed. Preoperative tests were correlated to final surgical pathology.

RESULTS

89 patients identified. Sixty-five had positive cytology, with a false positive rate of 32.3%. They were associated with papillomas in 52%, benign non-papillary in 33% and malignant lesions in 9% of cases. Nipple discharge cytology was positive in 69.6% of papillomas and 92% of atypical/malignant lesions; 30% had abnormal breast imaging and positive cytology. Nipple discharge cytology had a sensitivity of 74.5%, specificity of 30%, and positive predictive value of 68%. The positive predictive value increased to 85% with associated abnormal breast imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Nipple discharge cytology is useful in evaluating pathologic discharge. However, negative cytology with negative imaging is not enough to avoid surgery in cases of suspicious clinical presentation.

Bloody nipple discharge is a predictor of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Nipple discharge is a common complaint of patients with breast disease. The color of nipple discharge is always the first alarming symptom for patients. It is controversial whether the discharge color is an indicator of an underlying malignancy. The electronic database PubMed was searched for relevant articles. A meta-analysis about the association between the color of nipple discharge and breast cancer risk was conducted. Eight studies, including 3,110 patients, were eligible for this meta-analysis. Compared with patients in non-bloody nipple discharge group (179/1,478), patients in bloody nipple discharge group (404/1,632) had a markedly higher breast cancer risk (OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.32-3.89, P < 0.001 for heterogeneity). Compared with patients in clear/serous group (71/575), patients in bloody nipple discharge group (326/1,271) also had a higher risk (OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.25-4.93, P = 0.011 for heterogeneity). Furthermore, compared with patients in the colored group (55/448), patients in bloody nipple discharge group (296/1,124) (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 0.74-5.45, P = 0.009 for heterogeneity) had no significant difference. Besides, there was no significant difference between patients in colored group (55/448) and clear/serous group (61/470) (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.83-2.18, P = 0.707 for heterogeneity). Therefore, bloody nipple discharge could be a predictor of breast cancer risk among different colors of discharges. The symptom of bloody nipple discharge is helpful to the stratification of preoperative patients.

A look into the ductoscope: its role in pathologic nipple discharge

OBJECTIVE

Mammary ductoscopy allows direct visualization of the ductal system and a method for directed excision and pathologic diagnosis. We reviewed our experience with mammary ductoscopy in the evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients who underwent ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge at our institution from 2006-2010. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Data included patient and imaging characteristics, indications, operative findings, and pathologic outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used for data summary.

RESULTS

During the study period, 121 patients underwent ductoscopy and directed duct excision for pathologic nipple discharge, including 66 (55%) with bloody discharge. Breast imaging [mammography, ultrasound, and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] revealed BIRADS category I/II/III findings in 112 (93%), BIRADS category IV findings in 6 (5%), and was unknown in 3 (2%) patients. Final pathology revealed papillomas in 64 (53%) patients, duct ectasia and associated benign findings in 48 (40%) patients, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 7 (6%) patients, and atypical ductal hyperplasia in 2 (1%) patients. None of the patients with DCIS underwent preductoscopy MRI, but all had BIRADS category I/II/III breast imaging. The extent of DCIS identified by ductoscopy and subsequent surgical excision ranged from <1 cm to 10 cm (median 3 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with pathologic nipple discharge have benign nonproliferative findings or benign papillomas. Although atypia and malignancy were diagnosed in only 7% of patients who underwent ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge, there were no routine imaging findings indicative of these diagnoses preoperatively.

[The role of ductoscopy in the modern diagnostics and therapy of breast diseases]

Mammary ductoscopy is a modern, minimally invasive procedure that enables direct, in vivo observation of the mammary ductal system, primarily by nipple discharge. The rapidly developing device is suitable for aimed biopsy for further cytological or molecular examinations. High-tech equipments facilitate polypectomy or laser vaporization of certain intraluminal lesions, and play an important role in the direct surgical excision of the duct or the so-called terminal duct-lobular unit. The above listed facilitate the early diagnosis of malignancies even before imaging could detect them, and the control of high risk patients. Ductoscopy can foster surgical removal of ductal in situ tumors as anatomical units, thus enabling the optimization of radicality of breast conserving surgeries. Authors give a detailed description of the surgical techniques, and provide a wide review of the literature, for the first time in the Hungarian language. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 1284-1293.

Office ductoscopy for surgical selection in women with pathologic nipple discharge

BACKGROUND

Pathologic nipple discharge (PND) is diagnosed clinically and managed by diagnostic duct excision (DDE). Mammary ductoscopy in the office setting may change this standard. We performed a prospective study to assess the utility of office ductoscopy for surgical selection in women with nipple discharge.

METHODS

Women with nipple discharge meeting at least 2 of 3 criteria of PND (spontaneous, single duct, bloody or serous) underwent office ductoscopy. Those showing papillomatous lesions underwent DDE in the operating room (surgical group, n = 38); if no lesion was present, women were followed clinically (observation group, n = 21).

RESULTS

A papillomatous lesion was identified in 79% of women with 3-criteria PND and in 21% with 2 criteria (P = .001). DDE yielded a proliferative lesion in 35 of 38 women (92%). Of the 38, 27 (71%) had papillomata, 2 (5%) had florid hyperplasia, and 6 (16%) had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on final pathology. Also, 11 women with papilloma and 1 with DCIS presented with 2-criteria PND. Ductoscopy findings were a better predictor of the presence of intraductal neoplasia (area under curve [AUC] 0.9, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.8-0.98) compared with 3-criteria PND (AUC 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8). The 21 women in the observation group did not develop signs of malignancy or need biopsy during a 48-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that office ductoscopy provides accurate surgical selection of women with nipple discharge and should be considered for women with 2 criteria of PND, and those with negative ductoscopy can be safely observed. These findings need confirmation in a larger study with longer follow-up.

A randomized controlled study of selective microdochectomy guided by ductoscopic wire marking or methylene blue injection

BACKGROUND

Methylene blue identification of lesions during microdochectomy is often inaccurate, resulting in large dissection and tissue damage. A wire placed via ductoscopy preoperatively into the pathologic duct may aid identification and reduce the amount of dissection required.

METHODS

A total of 53 patients being evaluated for nipple discharge were randomized to receive ductoscopy with either methylene blue or wire marking of the lesion before microdochectomy. Patient clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 28 patients who received methylene blue marking and 25 who received wire marking of the lesions. There were no differences between the demographic or clinical characteristics of the groups. Wire marking was associated with less surgical time, smaller incisions, and smaller surgical specimens, but the same diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Wire marking of lesions for microdochectomy is associated with less dissection and tissue damage than methylene blue, yet the same diagnostic accuracy.

Nipple discharge: is its significance as a risk factor for breast cancer fully understood? Observational study including 915 consecutive patients who underwent selective duct excision

Nipple discharge (ND) is a common symptom seen in breast cancer clinics. The primary aim of this study was to identify preoperative risk factors for breast cancer in patients with pathologic ND. The secondary aim was to assess the clinical and pathological effectiveness of physical examination, galactography, cytological examination of the discharge, selective duct excision and ductoscopy. All patients operated on between 1975 and 2008 who presented with ND as their only symptom was analyzed. Discharge's characteristics, cytological data and galactography reports were recorded. The relationship between each individual finding and the risk of breast cancer was calculated. For each diagnostic tool, the sensitivity, specificity and complication rates were calculated and compared. Nine-hundred-fifteen patients underwent selective duct excision. Two-hundred-nineteen patients (23.9%) were found to be affected by carcinoma. In 100/330 (30.3%) patients with bloody discharge and in 42/239 (17.6%) patients with serous secretion cancer was detected (P = 0.004, P = 0.013, respectively). Patients with sero-sanguinous or coloured discharge had the same risk of cancer as the population analyzed (23.9%, P = NS). Galactographic finding of irregular stenosis seemed to be associated with a higher risk of cancer (P = 0.0001). Cytological findings C5 and C4 were associated with cancer (P = 0.001). Selective duct excision showed highest sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, the well established role of bloody secretion is confirmed. The supposed benign aetiology of serous, coloured or sero-sanguinous discharge is questionable. The high specificity of the cytological exam justifies routine examination of the ND. Selective duct excision can be considered as the diagnostic gold-standard.

Ductoscopy in the evaluation and management of nipple discharge

BACKGROUND

Nipple discharge is a relatively common complaint among patients visiting specialized outpatient clinics for disease of the breast. With advancing technology, it became possible to diagnose and manage nipple discharge using minimally invasive procedures. The aim of this study is to report our experience with ductoscopic evaluation of patients with nipple discharge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between September 2005 and February 2009, 236 patients with complaint of nipple discharge were admitted prospectively into the study. All patients were evaluated with ductoscopy. Data concerning age, ductoscopic and postsurgical diagnosis, duration, and complications with the procedure were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

For 236 patients evaluated, there were 249 ductoscopic investigations. Of these, 39 patients were found to have intraductal solitary papilloma of which 24 were excised ductoscopically. Of the 24 ductoscopically excised solitary papillomas, it was possible to remove 17 completely, but 7 papillomas could be removed partially. For 13 patients with solitary papillomas large enough or unfavorably localized so that they could not be snare-excised and for 14 patients with multiple papillomas, we offered surgical removal of the lesions by limited excision of the ducts with the help of ductoscopic localization and marking. There were 35 patients who had debris within the canalicular system, and the debris was washed out. Ductoscopy revealed atypical ductal hyperplasia in 3 patients, ductal carcinoma in situ in 6 patients, and invasive carcinoma in 3 patients; all patients underwent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that, as the technology quickly improves, ductoscopy will become more widely accepted and applied for breast disorders, not only as a diagnostic tool but also as a privileged therapeutic option for certain pathologies.