1
|
Yilmaz S, Gorgun E. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:277-288. [PMID: 39132198 PMCID: PMC11309798 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Up to 15% of colorectal polyps are amenable for conventional polypectomy. Advanced endoscopic resection techniques are introduced for the treatment of those polyps. They provide higher en bloc resection rates compared with conventional techniques, while helping patients to avoid the complications of surgery. Note that 20 mm is considered as the largest size of a polyp that can be resected by polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in an en bloc fashion. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended for polyps larger than 20 mm. Intramucosal carcinomas and carcinomas with limited submucosal invasion can also be resected with ESD. EMR is snare resection of a polyp following submucosal injection and elevation. ESD involves several steps such as marking, submucosal injection, incision, and dissection. Bleeding and perforation are the most common complications following advanced endoscopic procedures, which can be treated with coagulation and endoscopic clipping. En bloc resection rates range from 44.5 to 63% for EMR and from 87.9 to 96% for ESD. Recurrence rates following EMR and ESD are 7.4 to 17% and 0.9 to 2%, respectively. ESD is considered enough for the treatment of invasive carcinomas in the presence of submucosal invasion less than 1000 μm, absence of lymphovascular invasion, well-moderate histological differentiation, low-grade tumor budding, and negative resection margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumeyye Yilmaz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jacques J, Neuhaus H, Enderle MD, Biber U, Linzenbold W, Schenk M, Khalaf K, Repici A. Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Performance of a Novel Hybrid-Technology Knife in an Animal Trial. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3347. [PMID: 37958243 PMCID: PMC10650536 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed for the removal of benign and early malignant lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. We aimed to evaluate the performance and safety of a novel high-pressure waterjet-assisted ESD knife in colorectal applications. Six female German Landrace pigs with an average weight of 62 kg (range 60-65 kg) were used in this prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Twenty-four ESDs were performed by three endoscopists: Twelve each with the new Erbe HYBRIDknife® flex T-Type (HK-T) and the Olympus DualKnife® J (DK-J), including six rectal and six colonic ESDs per instrument. The order of performance was randomized regarding anatomic position and instrument. As the primary endpoint, ESD knife performance characteristics were combined and rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with 5 Likert points (LP) representing the best response (5 = very good). The HK-T was rated significantly better than the DK-J (4.7 LP versus 4.4 LP, p = 0.0295), mainly because of HK-T injection ability (5 LP versus 3 LP, p < 0.0001) and hemostasis (5 LP versus 4 LP, p = 0.0452). There was no difference in procedure time (HK-T: 35 min versus DK-J: 34 min, p = 0.8005), resection diameter (3.1 cm versus 2.8 cm, p = 0.3492), injection volume (41 mL versus 46 mL, p = 0.5633), and complication rates. HK-T is as effective as DK-J in colorectal ESD in terms of dissection quality but has better injection and hemostatic properties. The impact of these technical advantages on the ESD treatment of patients with large superficial colorectal lesions remains to be clinically verified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémie Jacques
- Department of Hepato-Gastro-Enterology, University Hospital Center, 87042 Limoges, France
| | - Horst Neuhaus
- Medical Clinic for Gastroenterology at the Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Ulrich Biber
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, 72072 Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Martin Schenk
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Okimoto K, Matsumura T, Matsusaka K, Inaba Y, Ishikawa T, Akizue N, Kaneko T, Ota M, Ohta Y, Taida T, Saito K, Ogasawara S, Maruoka D, Kato J, Ikeda JI, Kato N. Outcomes for Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of 21-30-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Feasible Study. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3963-3973. [PMID: 37658209 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08093-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of 21-30 mm colonic polyps. METHOD We conducted a single-center RCT. Patients diagnosed with suspected colorectal intramucosal carcinoma (21-30 mm and adaptable for both UEMR and ESD) were randomly assigned to the UEMR and ESD groups at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. We independently performed one-sample tests against the set threshold for each treatment. The significance level was set at p = 0.224. RESULT Eleven polyps each in the UEMR and ESD groups, respectively, were analyzed. The R0 resection rate (%) was 36 (95% confidence interval 11-69) and 100 (72-100) for UEMR and ESD, respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.002). The p-value against the set threshold for UEMR was 0.743, whereas that for ESD was < 0.001 (one-sample binomial test). The en bloc resection rates (%) were 82 (48-97) and 100 (72-100) for UEMR and ESD, respectively; however, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.167). The mean treatment time (min) was significantly shorter in the UEMR group (8 ± 6) than in the ESD group (48 ± 29) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION ESD could achieve a high R0 resection rate, while the en bloc resection rate was comparable between the two treatment techniques with less burden on patients undergoing UEMR for 21-30-mm colorectal polyps. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trial as jRCT1030210015 and jRCT1030210177.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichiro Okimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
| | - Tomoaki Matsumura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | | | - Yosuke Inaba
- Biostatistics Section, Chiba University Hospital Clinical Research Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tsubasa Ishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Naoki Akizue
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Kaneko
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ota
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Ohta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Takashi Taida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Keiko Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Sadahisa Ogasawara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Daisuke Maruoka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
- Kameido Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Jun-Ichiro Ikeda
- Department of Pathology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoya Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Omori T, Funasaka K, Horiguchi N, Kamano T, Nagasaka M, Nakagawa Y, Miyahara R, Hashimoto S, Shibata T, Ohmiya N, Hirooka Y. Injury to the muscle layer, increasing the risk of post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:87-93. [PMID: 36200387 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM In colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS) has been recognized as one of the major complications. There are no reports on the relationships between ESD findings and PECS. This study aims to evaluate the risk factors for PECS, including ESD findings such as muscularis propria exposure. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent colorectal ESD between January 2017 and December 2021 in Japan. The grade of injury to the muscle layer caused by ESD was categorized as follows: Grade 0, no exposure of muscularis propria; Grade 1, muscularis propria exposure; Grade 2, torn muscularis propria; and Grade 3, colon perforation. The risk factors for PECS, including injury to the muscle layer, were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Out of 314 patients who underwent colorectal ESD, PECS occurred in 28 patients (8.9%). The multivariate analysis showed that female sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.233; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.264-8.265, P = 0.014), large specimen size (≥ 40 mm) (OR 6.138; 95% CI: 1.317-28.596, P = 0.021), long procedure time (≥ 90 min) (OR 2.664; 95% CI: 1.053-6.742, P = 0.039), and Grade 1 or 2 injury to the muscle layer (OR 3.850; 95% CI: 1.090-13.61, P = 0.036) were independent risk factors for PECS. CONCLUSIONS Injury to the muscle layer, such as exposure or tear, was identified as a novel independent risk factor for PECS. We should perform colorectal ESD carefully to avoid injuring the muscle layers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Omori
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kohei Funasaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Horiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Kamano
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Mitsuo Nagasaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Ryoji Miyahara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Senju Hashimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Shibata
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Naoki Ohmiya
- Department of Advanced Endoscopy, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Hirooka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mann R, Gajendran M, Umapathy C, Perisetti A, Goyal H, Saligram S, Echavarria J. Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:728704. [PMID: 35127735 PMCID: PMC8811151 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.728704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous polyps and sessile serrated lesions. Screening colonoscopy and therapeutic polypectomy can potentially reduce colorectal cancer burden by early detection and removal of these polyps, thus decreasing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Most endoscopists are skilled in detecting and removing the vast majority of polyps endoscopically during a routine colonoscopy. Polyps can be considered “complex” based on size, location, morphology, underlying scar tissue, which are not amenable to removal by conventional endoscopic polypectomy techniques. They are technically more challenging to resect and carry an increased risk of complications. Most of these polyps were used to be managed by surgical intervention in the past. Rapid advancement in endoscopic resection techniques has led to a decreasing role of surgery in managing these complex polyps. These endoscopic resection techniques do require an expert in the field and advanced equipment to perform the procedure. In this review, we discuss various advanced endoscopic techniques for the management of complex polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupinder Mann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Agnes Medical Center, Fresno, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Rupinder Mann
| | - Mahesh Gajendran
- Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, United States
| | - Chandraprakash Umapathy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Abhilash Perisetti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States
| | - Hemant Goyal
- The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, PA, United States
| | - Shreyas Saligram
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Juan Echavarria
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ochi M, Kawagoe R, Kamoshida T, Hamano Y, Ohkawara H, Ohkawara A, Kakinoki N, Yamaguchi Y, Hirai S, Yanaka A, Tsuchiya K. High total Joule heat increases the risk of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:6442-6452. [PMID: 34720533 PMCID: PMC8517781 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i38.6442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We hypothesized that thermal damage accumulation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) causes the pathogenesis of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS).
AIM To determine the association between Joule heat and the onset of PECS.
METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients who underwent colorectal ESD from May 2013 to March 2021 in Japan. We developed a novel device that measures swift coagulation time with a sensor adjacent to the electrosurgical coagulation unit foot switch, which enabled us to calculate total Joule heat. PECS was defined as localized abdominal pain (visual analogue scale ≥ 30 mm during hospitalization or increased by ≥ 20 mm from the baseline) and fever (temperature ≥ 37.5 degrees or white blood cell count ≥ 10000 µ/L). Patients exposed to more or less than the median Joule heat value were assigned to the high and low Joule heat groups, respectively. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests and logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses.
RESULTS We evaluated 151 patients. The PECS incidence was 10.6% (16/151 cases), and all patients were followed conservatively and discharged without severe complications. In multivariate analysis, high Joule heat was an independent PECS risk factor. The area under the ROC curve showing the correlation between PECS and total Joule heat was high [0.788 (95% confidence interval: 0.666-0.909)].
CONCLUSION Joule heat accumulation in the gastrointestinal wall is involved in the onset of PECS. ESD-related thermal damage to the peeled mucosal surface is probably a major component of the mechanism underlying PECS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masanori Ochi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi City 317-0077, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Kawagoe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Toshiro Kamoshida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi City 317-0077, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yukako Hamano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi City 317-0077, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Haruka Ohkawara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi City 317-0077, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ohkawara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi City 317-0077, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Nobushige Kakinoki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi City 317-0077, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yuji Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi City 317-0077, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Shinji Hirai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi City 317-0077, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Akinori Yanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Kiichiro Tsuchiya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tanaka S, Saitoh Y, Matsuda T, Igarashi M, Matsumoto T, Iwao Y, Suzuki Y, Nozaki R, Sugai T, Oka S, Itabashi M, Sugihara KI, Tsuruta O, Hirata I, Nishida H, Miwa H, Enomoto N, Shimosegawa T, Koike K. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps. J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:323-335. [PMID: 33710392 PMCID: PMC8005396 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-021-01776-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE) published ''Daicho Polyp Shinryo Guideline 2014'' in Japanese and a part of this guideline was published in English as "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps" in the Journal of Gastroenterology in 2015. A revised version of the Japanese-language guideline was published in 2020, and here we introduce a part of the contents of revised version. METHODS The guideline committee discussed and drew up a series of clinical questions (CQs). Recommendation statements for the CQs were limited to items with multiple therapeutic options. Items with established conclusions that had 100% agreement with previous guidelines (background questions) and items with no (or old) evidence that are topics for future research (future research questions: FRQs) were given descriptions only. To address the CQs and FRQs, PubMed, ICHUSHI, and other sources were searched for relevant articles published in English from 1983 to October 2018 and articles published in Japanese from 1983 to November 2018. The Japan Medical Library Association was also commissioned to search for relevant materials. Manual searches were performed for questions with insufficient online references. RESULTS The professional committee created 18 CQs and statements concerning the current concept and diagnosis/treatment of various colorectal polyps, including their epidemiology, screening, pathophysiology, definition and classification, diagnosis, management, practical treatment, complications, and surveillance after treatment, and other colorectal lesions (submucosal tumors, nonneoplastic polyps, polyposis, hereditary tumors, ulcerative colitis-associated tumors/carcinomas). CONCLUSIONS After evaluation by the moderators, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps were proposed for 2020. This report addresses the therapeutic related CQs introduced when formulating these guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinji Tanaka
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan.
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Minami-ku, KasumiHiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Saitoh
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Takahisa Matsuda
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Masahiro Igarashi
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsumoto
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Yasushi Iwao
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Yasumoto Suzuki
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Nozaki
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Tamotsu Sugai
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Shiro Oka
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Michio Itabashi
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Sugihara
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Osamu Tsuruta
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Ichiro Hirata
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Nishida
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Hiroto Miwa
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Enomoto
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Tooru Shimosegawa
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Koike
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ham NS, Kim J, Oh EH, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, Ye BD, Myung SJ, Yang SK, Byeon JS. Cost of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection in the Colorectum. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65:969-977. [PMID: 31493041 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05822-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have compared the costs of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR). AIMS Here, we aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of these approaches by analyzing clinical outcomes and costs. METHODS Data from patients undergoing colorectal ESD and EPMR were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes (procedure time, complete resection, and recurrence) were compared, and total direct costs (procedural and follow-up) were assessed. RESULTS Data from 429 ESD and 115 EPMR patients were included in the analysis. The complete resection rate was significantly higher (83.9% vs. 32.2%, p < 0.001), recurrence rate was lower (0.5% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.001), procedure time was longer (55.4 ± 47.0 vs. 25.6 ± 32.7 min, p < 0.001), and total direct procedural costs at the initial resection were higher (1480.0 ± 728.0 vs. 729.8 ± 299.7 USD, p < 0.001) in the ESD group than in the EPMR group. The total number of surveillance endoscopies was higher in the EPMR group (1.7 ± 1.5 vs. 1.3 ± 1.1, p = 0.003). The cumulative total costs of ESD and EPMR were comparable at 3 and 2 years' follow-up in the adenoma and mucosal/superficial submucosal cancer subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Colorectal ESD was associated with higher complete resection and lower recurrence rates. EPMR showed shorter procedure times and similar cumulative total direct costs. ESD or EPMR should be chosen based on both clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nam Seok Ham
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Jeongseok Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Eun Hye Oh
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Sung Wook Hwang
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Sang Hyoung Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Dong-Hoon Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Byong Duk Ye
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Seung-Jae Myung
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Suk-Kyun Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Saitoh Y, Tsuruta O, Sugihara KI, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Kusunoki M, Koike K, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2020; 32:219-239. [PMID: 31566804 DOI: 10.1111/den.13545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 204] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Suitable lesions for endoscopic treatment include not only early colorectal carcinomas but also several types of precarcinomatous adenomas. It is important to establish practical guidelines wherein preoperative diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia and selection of endoscopic treatment procedures are appropriately outlined and to ensure that actual endoscopic treatment is useful and safe in general hospitals when carried out in accordance with guidelines. In cooperation with the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, the Japanese Society of Coloproctology, and the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society compiled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines by using evidence-based methods in 2014. The first edition of these guidelines was published 5 years ago. Accordingly, we have published the second edition of these guidelines based on recent new knowledge and evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinji Tanaka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yutaka Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroo Yamano
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoichi Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Hisabe
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yao
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiko Watanabe
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Saitoh
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Tsuruta
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Hisao Tajiri
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nomura T, Matsuzaki I, Sugimoto S, Oyamda J, Kamei A, Kobayashi M. Clip-on-clip closure method for a mucosal defect after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective feasibility study. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:1412-1416. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07195-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
11
|
Russo P, Barbeiro S, Awadie H, Libânio D, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Bourke M. Management of colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E239-E259. [PMID: 30705959 PMCID: PMC6353652 DOI: 10.1055/a-0732-487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective and study aims To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different endoscopic resection techniques for laterally spreading colorectal tumors (LST). Methods Relevant studies were identified in three electronic databases (PubMed, ISI and Cochrane Central Register). We considered all clinical studies in which colorectal LST were treated with endoscopic resection (endoscopic mucosal resection [EMR] and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD]) and/or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TEMS). Rates of en-bloc/piecemeal resection, complete endoscopic resection, R0 resection, curative resection, adverse events (AEs) or recurrence, were extracted. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Results Forty-nine studies were included. Complete resection was similar between techniques (EMR 99.5 % [95 % CI 98.6 %-100 %] vs. ESD 97.9 % [95 % CI 96.1 - 99.2 %]), being curative in 1685/1895 (13 studies, pooled curative resection 90 %, 95 % CI 86.6 - 92.9 %, I 2 = 79 %) with non-significantly higher curative resection rates with ESD (93.6 %, 95 % CI 91.3 - 95.5 %, vs. 84 % 95 % CI 78.1 - 89.3 % with EMR). ESD was also associated with a significantly higher perforation risk (pooled incidence 5.9 %, 95 % CI 4.3 - 7.9 %, vs. EMR 1.2 %, 95 % CI 0.5 - 2.3 %) while bleeding was significantly more frequent with EMR (9.6 %, 95 % CI 6.5 - 13.2 %; vs. ESD 2.8 %, 95 % CI 1.9 - 4.0 %). Procedure-related mortality was 0.1 %. Recurrence occurred in 5.5 %, more often with EMR (12.6 %, 95 % CI 9.1 - 16.6 % vs. ESD 1.1 %, 95 % CI 0.3 - 2.5 %), with most amenable to successful endoscopic treatment (87.7 %, 95 % CI 81.1 - 93.1 %). Surgery was limited to 2.7 % of the lesions, 0.5 % due to AEs. No data of TEMS were available for LST. Conclusions EMR and ESD are both effective and safe and are associated with a very low risk of procedure related mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Russo
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sandra Barbeiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
| | - Halim Awadie
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,CINTESIS/MEDCIDS, Porto Faculty of Medicine, Portugal
| | - Michael Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Albéniz E, Pellisé M, Gimeno-García AZ, Lucendo AJ, Alonso-Aguirre PA, Herreros de Tejada A, Álvarez MA, Fraile M, Herráiz Bayod M, López Rosés L, Martínez Ares D, Ono A, Parra Blanco A, Redondo E, Sánchez-Yagüe A, Soto S, Díaz-Tasende J, Montes Díaz M, Rodríguez-Téllez M, García O, Zuñiga Ripa A, Hernández Conde M, Alberca de Las Parras F, Gargallo CJ, Saperas E, Muñoz Navas M, Gordillo J, Ramos Zabala F, Echevarría JM, Bustamante M, González-Haba M, González-Huix F, González-Suárez B, Vila Costas JJ, Guarner Argente C, Múgica F, Cobián J, Rodríguez Sánchez J, López Viedma B, Pin N, Marín Gabriel JC, Nogales Ó, de la Peña J, Navajas León FJ, León Brito H, Remedios D, Esteban JM, Barquero D, Martínez Cara JG, Martínez Alcalá F, Fernández-Urién I, Valdivielso E. Clinical guidelines for endoscopic mucosal resection of non-pedunculated colorectal lesions. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2018; 110:179-194. [PMID: 29421912 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5086/2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Albéniz
- Aparato Digestivo. Unidad de Endoscopia Digestiva, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, España
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maite Herráiz Bayod
- Unidad de Endoscopia. Departamento de Digestivo, Clínica Universidad de Navarra
| | | | | | - Akiko Ono
- Digestivo/Endoscopias, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
| | | | | | | | | | - José Díaz-Tasende
- Servicio de Medicina del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, España
| | - Marta Montes Díaz
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, España
| | | | | | | | - Marta Hernández Conde
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marco Bustamante
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit. Gastoenterology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, España
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Óscar Nogales
- Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, España
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Albéniz E, Pellisé M, Gimeno García AZ, Lucendo AJ, Alonso Aguirre PA, Herreros de Tejada A, Álvarez MA, Fraile M, Herráiz Bayod M, López Rosés L, Martínez Ares D, Ono A, Parra Blanco A, Redondo E, Sánchez Yagüe A, Soto S, Díaz Tasende J, Montes Díaz M, Téllez MR, García O, Zuñiga Ripa A, Hernández Conde M, Alberca de las Parras F, Gargallo C, Saperas E, Navas MM, Gordillo J, Ramos Zabala F, Echevarría JM, Bustamante M, González Haba M, González Huix F, González Suárez B, Vila Costas JJ, Guarner Argente C, Múgica F, Cobián J, Rodríguez Sánchez J, López Viedma B, Pin N, Marín Gabriel JC, Nogales Ó, de la Peña J, Navajas León FJ, León Brito H, Remedios D, Esteban JM, Barquero D, Martínez Cara JG, Martínez Alcalá F, Fernández Urién I, Valdivielso E. Guía clínica para la resección mucosa endoscópica de lesiones colorrectales no pediculadas. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2018; 41:175-190. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
14
|
Kim TJ, Kim ER, Hong SN, Kim YH, Chang DK. Current practices in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: a survey of indications among Korean endoscopists. Intest Res 2017; 15:228-235. [PMID: 28522954 PMCID: PMC5430016 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2016] [Revised: 03/13/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims The indications for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) vary in clinical practice. To establish colorectal ESD as a standard treatment, standard indications are essential. For establishing standard indications for colorectal ESD, we surveyed the preferences and criteria of endoscopists for colorectal ESD in their practices. Methods A multiple-choice questionnaire was sent to 27 members of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/ESD group. The indications of endoscopists for selecting ESD as a treatment for colorectal tumors ≥2 cm in diameter were surveyed. Results On the basis of the preprocedural assessment of histology, adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, mucosal cancer, and shallow submucosa invasive cancer were included in the indication for ESD. Based on gross morphology, laterally spreading tumor (LST) granular nodular mixed type, LST-nongranular (LST-NG) flat elevated type, and LST-NG pseudodepressed type were included. On the basis of the pit pattern by Kudo classification, types III, IV, and V-I were included. Based on the narrow band imaging pattern by Sano classification, types II and III-a were included. Other lesions, such as sporadic localized tumors in chronic inflammation and local residual early carcinoma after endoscopic resection, were also included in the indication for ESD. Conclusions The indications of Korean endoscopists for colorectal ESD are broader than those in recent guidelines, and tend to include more benign-looking tumors. To find the appropriate indications for colorectal ESD, systematic data collection and analysis are required to reach a consensus in a timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Jun Kim
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Ran Kim
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Noh Hong
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Ho Kim
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Kyung Chang
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Akintoye E, Kumar N, Aihara H, Nas H, Thompson CC. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4:E1030-E1044. [PMID: 27747275 PMCID: PMC5063641 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-114774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced endoscopic technique that allows en-bloc resection of gastrointestinal tumor. We systematically review the medical literature in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of colorectal ESD. Patients and methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid, CINAHL, and Cochrane for studies reporting on the clinical efficacy and safety profile of colorectal ESD. Results: Included in this study were 13833 tumors in 13603 patients (42 % female) who underwent colorectal ESD between 1998 and 2014. The R0 resection rate was 83 % (95 % CI, 80 - 86 %) with significant between-study heterogeneity (P < 0.001) which was partly explained by difference in continent (P = 0.004), study design (P = 0.04), duration of the procedure (P = 0.009), and, marginally, by average tumor size (P = 0.09). Endoscopic en bloc and curative resection rates were 92 % (95 % CI, 90 - 94 %) and 86 % (95 % CI, 80 - 90 %), respectively. The rates of immediate and delayed perforation were 4.2 % (95 % CI, 3.5 - 5.0 %) and 0.22 % (95 % CI, 0.11 - 0.46 %), respectively, while rates of immediate and delayed major bleeding were 0.75 % (95 % CI, 0.31 - 1.8 %) and 2.1 % (95 % CI, 1.6 - 2.6 %). After an average postoperative follow up of 19 months, the rate of tumor recurrence was 0.04 % (95 % CI, 0.01 - 0.31) among those with R0 resection and 3.6 % (95 % CI, 1.4 - 8.8 %) among those without R0 resection. Overall, irrespective of the resection status, recurrence rate was 1.0 % (95 % CI, 0.42 - 2.1 %). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis, the largest and most comprehensive assessment of colorectal ESD to date, showed that colorectal ESD is safe and effective for colorectal tumors and warrants consideration as first-line therapy when an expert operator is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Akintoye
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States
| | - Nitin Kumar
- Developmental Endoscopy Lab, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Hala Nas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States
| | - Christopher C. Thompson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Akintoye E, Obaitan I, Muthusamy A, Akanbi O, Olusunmade M, Levine D. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8:517-532. [PMID: 27606044 PMCID: PMC4980641 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i15.517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2016] [Revised: 06/11/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To systematically review the medical literature in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Ovid, CINAHL, and Cochrane for studies reporting on the clinical efficacy and safety profile of gastric ESD.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine thousand five hundred and six tumors in 27155 patients (31% female) who underwent gastric ESD between 1999 and 2014 were included in this study. R0 resection rate was 90% (95%CI: 87%-92%) with significant between-study heterogeneity (P < 0.001) which was partly explained by difference in region (P = 0.02) and sample size (P = 0.04). Endoscopic en bloc and curative resection rates were 94% (95%CI: 93%-96%) and 86% (95%CI: 83%-89%) respectively. The rate of immediate and delayed perforation rates were 2.7% (95%CI: 2.1%-3.3%) and 0.39% (95%CI: 0.06%-2.4%) respectively while rates of immediate and delayed major bleeding were 2.9% (95%CI: 1.3-6.6) and 3.6% (95%CI: 3.1%-4.3%). After an average follow-up of about 30 mo post-operative, the rate of tumor recurrence was 0.02% (95%CI: 0.001-1.4) among those with R0 resection and 7.7% (95%CI: 3.6%-16%) among those without R0 resection. Overall, irrespective of the resection status, recurrence rate was 0.75% (95%CI: 0.42%-1.3%).
CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis, the largest and most comprehensive assessment of gastric ESD till date, showed that gastric ESD is safe and effective for gastric tumors and warrants consideration as first line therapy when an expert operator is available.
Collapse
|
17
|
De Ceglie A, Hassan C, Mangiavillano B, Matsuda T, Saito Y, Ridola L, Bhandari P, Boeri F, Conio M. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016; 104:138-55. [PMID: 27370173 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2016] [Revised: 04/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of colorectal lesions. METHODS A literature search was conducted from January 2000 to May 2015. The main outcomes were: recurrence after "en bloc" and "piecemeal" resection; procedure related adverse events; the EMR endoscopic success rate and the completely eradicated resection rate (R0) after ESD. RESULTS A total of 66 studies were included in the analysis. The total number of lesions was 17950 (EMR: 11.873; ESD: 6077). Recurrence rate was higher in the EMR than ESD group (765/7303l vs. 50/3910 OR 8.19, 95% CI 6.2-10.9 p<0.0001). EMR-en bloc resection was achieved in 6793/10803 lesions (62.8%) while ESD-en bloc resection was obtained in 5500/6077 lesions (90.5%) (OR 0.18, p<0.0001, 95% CI 0.16-0.2). Perforation occurred more frequently in ESD than in EMR group (p<0.0001, OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.15-0.24). CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions is safe and effective. Compared with EMR, ESD results in higher "en bloc" resection rate and lower local recurrence rate, however ESD has high procedure-related complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Gastroenterology Department, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Takahisa Matsuda
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Lorenzo Ridola
- Gastroenterology Unit, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Gastroenterology Department, Portsmouth Hospital NHS Trust, Portsmouth, Hampshire, UK
| | - Federica Boeri
- Gastroenterology Department, General Hospital, Sanremo, Italy
| | - Massimo Conio
- Gastroenterology Department, General Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasms According to Clinical Indications. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59:403-10. [PMID: 27050602 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although endoscopic submucosal dissection has been shown to be safe and effective for colorectal tumors, its clinical outcomes vary. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection according to clinical indications. DESIGN This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. SETTING The study was conducted at special hospitals for colorectal diseases and cancers. PATIENTS The study population included consecutive patients aged 20 to 80 years who underwent colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for 1) early colorectal cancer, 2) laterally spreading tumors ≥2 cm in diameter, and 3) submucosal tumors. INTERVENTIONS Procedures were performed by experienced colonoscopists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end points were en bloc and curative resection rates. En bloc resection was defined as endoscopic one-piece resection without tumor fragmentation. Curative resection was defined as en bloc resection and no pathologic requirement for additional surgery. Secondary end points included procedure time, complications, and hospital stay. RESULTS Of 321 patients, 317 (98.8%) underwent en bloc resection and 231 (72.0%) underwent curative resection. The mean procedure time was 46.2 minutes. Mean hospital stay after the procedure was 3.1 days. Perforation occurred in 2 patients (0.6%), and bleeding occurred in 10 (3.1%) patients. All patients with complications were treated by endoscopic clipping or nonoperative management. Fifteen patients (4.7%) underwent additional radical surgery owing to the risks of lymph node metastasis. Although tumor size was smaller and procedure time shorter in the submucosal tumor group than in the laterally spreading tumor or early colorectal cancer group, there were no differences in clinical outcomes including en bloc and curative resection rates. Submucosal fibrosis was the only factor affecting endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure-related complications. LIMITATIONS Early outcomes in a limited population and the potential for selection bias were limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection were acceptable in selected patients, with no difference in outcomes according to clinical indications. Because submucosal fibrosis can increase complications, it should be minimized before endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Collapse
|
19
|
Gorospe EC, Wong Kee Song LM. Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colon: Cutting corners or trimming fat? Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83:593-5. [PMID: 26897050 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel C Gorospe
- Prevea Center for Digestive Health & Medical College of Wisconsin-Green Bay Campus, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Roy S, Evans C. Overview of robotic colorectal surgery: Current and future practical developments. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8:143-150. [PMID: 26981188 PMCID: PMC4770168 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i2.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Revised: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 12/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimal access surgery has revolutionised colorectal surgery by offering reduced morbidity and mortality over open surgery, while maintaining oncological and functional outcomes with the disadvantage of additional practical challenges. Robotic surgery aids the surgeon in overcoming these challenges. Uptake of robotic assistance has been relatively slow, mainly because of the high initial and ongoing costs of equipment but also because of limited evidence of improved patient outcomes. Advances in robotic colorectal surgery will aim to widen the scope of minimal access surgery to allow larger and more complex surgery through smaller access and natural orifices and also to make the technology more economical, allowing wider dispersal and uptake of robotic technology. Advances in robotic endoscopy will yield self-advancing endoscopes and a widening role for capsule endoscopy including the development of motile and steerable capsules able to deliver localised drug therapy and insufflation as well as being recharged from an extracorporeal power source to allow great longevity. Ultimately robotic technology may advance to the point where many conventional surgical interventions are no longer required. With respect to nanotechnology, surgery may eventually become obsolete.
Collapse
|
21
|
Bianco F, Arezzo A, Agresta F, Coco C, Faletti R, Krivocapic Z, Rotondano G, Santoro GA, Vettoretto N, De Franciscis S, Belli A, Romano GM. Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19:577-85. [PMID: 26403233 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-015-1361-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2015] [Accepted: 05/22/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Early colon cancer (ECC) has been defined as a carcinoma with invasion limited to the submucosa regardless of lymph node status and according to the Royal College of Pathologists as TNM stage T1 NX M0. As the potential risk of lymph node metastasis ranges from 6 to 17% and the preoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis is not reliable, the management of ECC is still controversial, varying from endoscopic to radical resection. A meeting on recent advances on the management of colorectal polyps endorsed by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) took place in April 2014, in Genoa (Italy). Based on this material the SICCR decided to issue guidelines updating the evidence and to write a position statement paper in order to define the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for ECC treatment in context of the Italian healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Bianco
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, "Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - F Agresta
- Department of General Surgery, Ulss1 9 of the Veneto, Civic Hospital, Adria (TV), Italy
| | - C Coco
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - R Faletti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Institute University Hospital City of Health and Science, Turin University, Turin, Italy
| | - Z Krivocapic
- Clinical Center of Serbia, Institute for Digestive Disease, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro
| | - G Rotondano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maresca Hospital, Torre del Greco (NA), Italy
| | - G A Santoro
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - N Vettoretto
- Department of General Surgery, Montichiari Hospital, Civic Hospitals of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - S De Franciscis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, "Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - A Belli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, "Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - G M Romano
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, "Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Kudo SE, Tsuruta O, Sugihara KI, Watanabe T, Saitoh Y, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Ichinose M, Matsui T, Sugita A, Sugano K, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2015; 27:417-434. [PMID: 25652022 DOI: 10.1111/den.12456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 398] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2014] [Accepted: 02/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become common in recent years. Suitable lesions for endoscopic treatment include not only early colorectal carcinomas but also many types of precarcinomatous adenomas. It is important to establish practical guidelines in which the preoperative diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia and the selection of endoscopic treatment procedures are properly outlined, and to ensure that the actual endoscopic treatment is useful and safe in general hospitals when carried out in accordance with the guidelines. In cooperation with the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, the Japanese Society of Coloproctology, and the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society has recently compiled a set of colorectal ESD/endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) guidelines using evidence-based methods. The guidelines focus on the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and caveat before, during, and after ESD/EMR and, in this regard, exclude the specific procedures, types and proper use of instruments, devices, and drugs. Although eight areas, ranging from indication to pathology, were originally planned for inclusion in these guidelines, evidence was scarce in each area. Therefore, grades of recommendation were determined largely through expert consensus in these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinji Tanaka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yutaka Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroo Yamano
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoichi Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Hisabe
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yao
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiko Watanabe
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Shin-Ei Kudo
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Tsuruta
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Yusuke Saitoh
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masao Ichinose
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Matsui
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Sugita
- Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Hisao Tajiri
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tanaka S, Saitoh Y, Matsuda T, Igarashi M, Matsumoto T, Iwao Y, Suzuki Y, Nishida H, Watanabe T, Sugai T, Sugihara KI, Tsuruta O, Hirata I, Hiwatashi N, Saito H, Watanabe M, Sugano K, Shimosegawa T. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps. J Gastroenterol 2015; 50:252-60. [PMID: 25559129 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-014-1021-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2014] [Accepted: 11/07/2014] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently in Japan, the morbidity of colorectal polyp has been increasing. As a result, a large number of cases of colorectal polyps that are diagnosed and treated using colonoscopy has now increased, and clinical guidelines are needed for endoscopic management and surveillance after treatment. METHODS Three committees [the professional committee for making clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators] were organized. Ten specialists for colorectal polyp management extracted the specific clinical statements from articles published between 1983 and September 2011 obtained from PubMed and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. Basically, statements were made according to the GRADE system. The expert panel individually rated the clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than seven on a nine-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. RESULTS The professional committee created 91CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis/treatment of various colorectal polyps including epidemiology, screening, pathophysiology, definition and classification, diagnosis, treatment/management, practical treatment, complications and surveillance after treatment, and other colorectal lesions (submucosal tumors, nonneoplastic polyps, polyposis, hereditary tumors, ulcerative colitis-associated tumor/carcinoma). CONCLUSIONS After evaluation by the moderators, evidence-based clinical guidelines for management of colorectal polyps have been proposed for 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinji Tanaka
- Guidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13 Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T, Tominaga M, Ueno N, Inaba Y, Ito T, Moriichi K, Kohgo Y. Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81:583-95. [PMID: 25592748 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 236] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2014] [Accepted: 07/11/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are used frequently to remove colon neoplasms. However, the predominance of these procedures has not yet been thoroughly explored. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and adverse events related to EMR with those related to ESD for colon neoplasms. DESIGN A meta-analysis of 8 studies published between 2005 and 2013. SETTING Multicenter review. PATIENTS Patients from 8 studies yielding 2299 lesions. INTERVENTIONS EMR or ESD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS En bloc resection, curative resection, recurrence, and adverse events. RESULTS The pooled odds ratios (OR) (OR [95% confidence interval]) for the tumor size, length of the procedure, en bloc resection, curative resection, recurrence, additional surgery, delayed bleeding, and perforation by ESD versus EMR were 7.38 (6.42-8.34), 58.07 (36.27-79.88), 6.84 (3.30-14.18), 4.26 (3.77-6.57), 0.08 (0.04-0.17), 2.16 (1.16-4.03), 0.85 (0.45-1.60), and 4.96 (2.79-8.85), respectively. LIMITATIONS This analysis included only nonrandomized studies. CONCLUSION The size of the tumor and rate of en bloc resection and curative resection were higher, and the rate of recurrence was lower in the ESD group versus the EMR group. However, in the ESD group, the procedure was longer, and the rate of additional surgery and perforation was higher, suggesting that the indications for ESD should therefore be rigorously determined in order to avoid such problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikihiro Fujiya
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Tanaka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Dokoshi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Motoya Tominaga
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Ueno
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yuhei Inaba
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takahiro Ito
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kentaro Moriichi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yutaka Kohgo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Patel RK, Sayers AE, Kumar P, Khulusi S, Razack A, Hunter IA. The Role of Endorectal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Early Rectal Lesions in a Tertiary Center. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2014; 13:245-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2014] [Accepted: 09/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
26
|
Coman RM, Gotoda T, Draganov PV. Training in endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5:369-378. [PMID: 23951392 PMCID: PMC3742702 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i8.369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2013] [Revised: 04/26/2013] [Accepted: 06/19/2013] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) represents an important advancement in the therapy of early neoplastic gastrointestinal lesions by providing higher en-bloc curative resection rate with lower recurrence compared to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and by sparing the involved organ and protecting patient’s quality of life. Despite these advantages ESD is associated with long procedure times and a higher rate of complications, making ESD a challenging procedure which requires advanced endoscopic skills. Thus, there has been a recognized need for structured training system for ESD to enhance trainee experience and, to reduce the risks of complications and inadequate treatment. ESD has a very flat learning curve. However, we do not have uniformly accepted benchmarks for competency. Nevertheless, it appears that, in Japan, more than 30 supervised gastric ESD procedures are required to achieve technical proficiency and minimize complications. A number of training algorithms have been proposed in Japan with the aim to standardize ESD training. These algorithms cannot be directly applied in the West due to substantial differences including the availability of highly qualified mentors, the type of pathology seen, choice of devices, and trainee’s background. We propose a training algorithm for Western physicians which integrates both hands-on training courses, animal model work as well as visits to expert centers. No specific preceptor training programs have been yet developed but there is a consensus that these programs are important for permeation of ESD worldwide.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) represents an important advancement in the therapy of early neoplastic gastrointestinal lesions by providing higher en-bloc curative resection rate with lower recurrence compared to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and by sparing the involved organ and protecting patient's quality of life. Despite these advantages ESD is associated with long procedure times and a higher rate of complications, making ESD a challenging procedure which requires advanced endoscopic skills. Thus, there has been a recognized need for structured training system for ESD to enhance trainee experience and, to reduce the risks of complications and inadequate treatment. ESD has a very flat learning curve. However, we do not have uniformly accepted benchmarks for competency. Nevertheless, it appears that, in Japan, more than 30 supervised gastric ESD procedures are required to achieve technical proficiency and minimize complications. A number of training algorithms have been proposed in Japan with the aim to standardize ESD training. These algorithms cannot be directly applied in the West due to substantial differences including the availability of highly qualified mentors, the type of pathology seen, choice of devices, and trainee's background. We propose a training algorithm for Western physicians which integrates both hands-on training courses, animal model work as well as visits to expert centers. No specific preceptor training programs have been yet developed but there is a consensus that these programs are important for permeation of ESD worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxana M Coman
- Roxana M Coman, Peter V Draganov, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Williams JG, Pullan RD, Hill J, Horgan PG, Salmo E, Buchanan GN, Rasheed S, McGee SG, Haboubi N. Management of the malignant colorectal polyp: ACPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15 Suppl 2:1-38. [PMID: 23848492 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J G Williams
- Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kim YJ, Kim ES, Cho KB, Park KS, Jang BK, Chung WJ, Hwang JS. Comparison of clinical outcomes among different endoscopic resection methods for treating colorectal neoplasia. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58:1727-1736. [PMID: 23385636 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2560-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2012] [Accepted: 01/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Endoscopic treatments of colorectal neoplasms have yet to be standardized. This study aimed to compare efficacy and tolerability of different endoscopic resection methods for colorectal epithelial tumors. METHODS Patients with non-pedunculated colorectal tumors undergoing endoscopic treatments were consecutively enrolled, and their medical records were reviewed retrospectively. The resection methods were classified into three groups: endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential precutting (EMR-P), endoscopic submucosal dissection with snaring (ESD-S), and endoscopic submucosal dissection alone (ESD). We compared en bloc resection, pathological complete resection, and complications associated with these methods. RESULTS Overall, 206 lesions from 203 patients were included in the study (mean size 25.2 ± 10.1 mm). The number of lesions treated with EMR-P, ESD-S, and ESD was 91 (44.2 %), 57 (27.7 %), and 58 (28.2 %), respectively. There was a significant difference in both the en bloc resection rates (EMR-P, 61.5 %; ESD-S, 64.9 %; ESD, 96.6 %; p = 0.001) and complete resection rates (EMR-P, 51.6 %; ESD-S, 54.4 %; ESD, 75.9 %; p = 0.009). Bleeding and perforation were less frequently observed in the EMR-P group. In the subgroup-analysis of lesions less than 20 mm, however, these differences were not observed. CONCLUSIONS All endoscopic resection methods, including EMR-P, ESD-S, and ESD, were effective and safe for the treatment of colorectal neoplasms. Technically demanding ESD with high en bloc and complete resection rate should be reserved for the suspicious cancer lesion, which requires the precise histological evaluation. EMR-P with good feasibility can be considered an alternative to ESD for the lesions less than 20 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Jung Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, 194 Dong San-dong, Jung-gu, Daegu, 700-712, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nicolás-Pérez D. [Endoscopic submucosal dissection: only for expert endoscopists?]. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2012; 35:344-67. [PMID: 22341600 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2011.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2011] [Accepted: 12/29/2011] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be applied to early gastrointestinal cancers. This technique was developed to achieve radical curative resection and to reduce unnecessary surgical interventions. ESD was designed in eastern countries and is not widely used in the West. Although ESD represents a major therapeutic advance in endoscopy and is performed with curative intent, the complication rate (hemorrhage, perforation) is higher than reported in other techniques, requiring from endoscopists the acquirement of technical skill and experience through a structured and progressive training program to reduce the morbidity associated with this technique and increase its potential benefits. Although there is substantial published evidence on the applications and results of ESD, there are few publications on training in this technique and a standardized training program is lacking. The current article aims to describe the various proposals for training, as well as the basic principles of the technique, its indications, and the results obtained, since theoretical knowledge that would guide endoscopists during the clinical application of ESD is advisable before training begins. Training in an endoscopic technique has a little value without knowledge of the technique's aims, the situations in which it should be applied, and the results that can be expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Nicolás-Pérez
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jang EJ, Kim DD, Cho CH. Value and interpretation of resection margin after a colonoscopic polypectomy for malignant polyps. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF COLOPROCTOLOGY 2011; 27:194-201. [PMID: 21980590 PMCID: PMC3180600 DOI: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.4.194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2011] [Accepted: 07/15/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This study was designed to compare the clinicopathologic findings of an endoscopic polypectomy for malignant polyps with subsequent surgery and to evaluate the appropriateness of the pathologic finding criterion of the resection margin as an indicator for surgery in cases of malignant colorectal polyps. Methods We examined the clinicopathologic characteristics, complications and prognoses among the patients who underwent a colonoscopic polypectomy in both our hospitals and at other hospitals from April 2003 and April 2010. These patients were divided into two groups, the group (non-operation group) that only underwent a polypectomy (n = 37) and the group (operation group) that underwent a polypectomy with subsequent surgery (n = 33). Results There were no differences between two groups in the ratios of the number of men to the number of women, the ages or the comorbidities. In terms of endoscopic findings, we found no differences between the two groups in the locations of the polyps, the sizes of the polyps, or the presence of stalks. However, ulceration of polyps was higher in the non-operation group (51.5% vs. 21.6%; P = 0.009), as was the case with submucosal invasion (75.8% vs. 16.2%; P < 0.005). When an endoscopic polypectomy was performed, incomplete resection margins and specimens with margins involved occurred more frequently in the operation group (93.9% vs. 51.4%; P < 0.005), but no residual tumor was detected in 31 of 33 (93.9%) patients in that group. One pathologist reviewed the specimens of 54 patients (operation group, 19; non-operation group, 36). Six of the 19 polyps (31.6%) in the operation group and fifteen of the 36 polyps (41.7%) in the non-operation group had a margin without cancer cells. Conclusion We may accept the criterion of a safe margin, including a coagulation zone. A multidisciplinary approach has to be developed by surgeons, endoscopists and pathologists based on a discussion of the risk factors for the patient before making a decision on the treatment treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Jung Jang
- Colorectal Clinic, Department of Surgery, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ravizza D, Tamayo D, Fiori G, Trovato C, De Roberto G, de Leone A, Crosta C. Linear array ultrasonography to stage rectal neoplasias suitable for local treatment. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43:636-41. [PMID: 21550864 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2010] [Revised: 02/08/2011] [Accepted: 03/27/2011] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the many therapeutic options available, a reliable staging is crucial for rectal neoplasia management. Adenomas and cancers limited to the submucosa without lymph node involvement may be treated locally. AIMS The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in the staging of neoplasias suitable for local treatment. METHODS We considered all patients who underwent endorectal ultrasonography between 2001 and 2010. The study population consisted of 92 patients with 92 neoplasias (68 adenocarcinomas and 24 adenomas). A 5 and 7.5MHz linear array echoendoscope was used. The postoperative histopathologic result was compared with the preoperative staging defined by endorectal ultrasonography. Adenomas and cancers limited to the submucosa were considered together (pT0-1). RESULTS The sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy rate, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of endorectal ultrasonography for pT0-1 were 86%, 95.6%, 91.3%, 94.9% and 88.7%. Those for nodal involvement were 45.4%, 95.5%, 83%, 76.9% and 84%, with 3 false positive results and 12 false negative. For combined pT0-1 and pN0, endorectal ultrasonography showed an 87.5% sensitivity, 95.9% specificity, 92% overall accuracy rate, 94.9% positive predictive value and 90.2% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION Endorectal linear array ultrasonography is a reliable tool to detect rectal neoplasias suitable for local treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Ravizza
- European Institute of Oncology, Division of Endoscopy, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a safe and effective alternative to surgery for large non-polypoid colonic lesions and early colorectal carcinoma. In this article, we discuss the development, efficacy and safety of ESD. As the incidence of colorectal cancer is rapidly increasing in Asia, we advocate standardization of ESD program, including patient selection, hardware prerequisites, and training of operators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larry H Lai
- Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Colorectal cancer screening and prevention is a pivotal element in every gastroenterologist practice. Recent advances in imaging technology and treatment opened the field for endoscopic management of large flat colorectal polyps and early cancer. RECENT FINDINGS High-definition white light colonoscopy allowed for better characterization of colon polyps, particularly flat lesions. Chromoendoscopy facilitated the identification of colon polyps as well as better endoscopic polyp characterization, with strong correlation with final pathological diagnosis, opening the field of 'virtual' biopsy. One particular technology, confocal endomicroscopy can magnify an image approximately 1000 times resembling optical microscopy with very good correlation with histology. Endoscopic mucosal resection has gained great acceptance to manage flat colorectal polyps with the two major complications being bleeding and perforation, both now under 5% in experienced hands. Endoscopic submucosal resection was developed to increase en-bloc resection (less residual disease) of a flat colorectal lesion but one has to accept a higher perforation rate around 10%. SUMMARY Current technology allows for better polyp identification and characterization, which can be managed endoscopically.
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Nowadays, the number of cases in which malignant colorectal polyps are removed is increasing due to colorectal cancer screening programmes. Cancerous polyps are classified into non-invasive high grade neoplasia (NHGN), when the cancer has not reached the muscularis mucosa, and malignant polyps, classed as T1, when they have invaded the submucosa. NHGN is considered cured with polypectomy, while the prognosis for malignant polyps depends on various morphological and histological factors. The prognostic factors include, sessile or pedunculated morphology of the polyp, whether partial or en bloc resection is carried out, the degree of differentiation of the carcinoma, vascular or lymphatic involvement, and whether the polypectomy resection margin is tumor free. A malignant polyp at T1 is considered cured with polypectomy if it is a pedunculated polyp (Ip of the Paris classification), it has been completely resected, it is not poorly differentiated, the resection edge is not affected by the tumor and there is no vascular or lymphatic involvement. The sessile malignant polyp (Is of the Paris classification) at T1 is considered not cured with polypectomy. Only in some cases (e.g. older people with high surgical risk) local excision (polypectomy or endoscopic submucosal dissection or conventional endoscopic mucosal resection) is considered the definitive treatment.
Collapse
|