Anorectal Infections in Neutropenic Leukemia Patients: A Common Clinical Challenge

Anorectal infections in neutropenic leukemia patients are a significant and potentially life-threatening complication. The pathogenesis of this condition is not entirely understood and believed to be multifactorial, including mucosal injury as a result of cytotoxic drugs, profound neutropenia and impaired host defense. Establishing an early diagnosis is key and often made clinically on the basis of signs and symptoms, but also from imaging studies demonstrating perianal inflammation or fluid collection. The management of anorectal infections in neutropenic leukemia patients is not straightforward, as there are no well-conducted studies on this entity. This review seeks to provide a framework into the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of anorectal infections in neutropenic leukemia patients, propose a diagnostic approach and to discuss controversies in the management of this condition.

Leukopenia is an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications following incision and drainage of anorectal abscess

AIM

Few data are available regarding the management of anorectal abscess in patients with leukopenia. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of leukopenia among patients undergoing incision and drainage for anorectal abscess.

METHOD

A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database identified patients from 2015 to 2020. Perianal fistulas and supralevator abscesses were excluded. Patients were grouped based on white blood cell (WBC) count: WBC < 4.5 cells/μl, WBC = 4.5-11.0 cells/μl and WBC > 11.0 cells/μl. The 30-day overall complications and outcomes were compared using regression models, accounting for demographics and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Ten thousand two hundred and forty (70.3% male) patients were identified. Univariate analysis showed that, compared with patients with leukocytosis (WBC > 11.0 cells/μl) and normal WBC count (WBC = 4.5-11.0 cells/μl), patients with leukopenia (WBC <4.5 cells/μl) had higher rates of overall (p < 0.001), pulmonary (p < 0.001) and haematological complications (p < 0.001). They also had higher rates of readmission (p < 0.001), reoperation (p = 0.005), discharge to a care facility (p = 0.003), increased length of hospital stay (p = 0.004) and death (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified leukopenia as an independent risk factor for overall complications [odds ratio (OR) 2.31, 95% CI 1.65-3.24; p < 0.001], pulmonary complications (OR 5.65, 95% CI 1.88-16.97; p = 0.002), haematological complications (OR 4.30, 95% CI 2.94-6.28; p < 0.001), unplanned readmission (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.43-3.40; p < 0.001), reoperation (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.10-2.93; p = 0.019) and death (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.02-7.52; p = 0.046). Discharge to a care facility and length of stay were not significant on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Leukopenia is associated with increased risk for pulmonary and haematological complications, readmissions, reoperations, discharge to a care facility and death after incision and drainage for anorectal abscess.

Gastrointestinal Surgical Emergencies in the Neutropenic Immunocompromised Patient

Surgeons encounter neutropenic patients through elective or emergency consultation with increasing regularity. As medical management continues to extend the lives of patients with benign hematologic diseases, hematologic malignancies, solid malignancies, or iatrogenic neutropenia, more patients are presenting with infectious complications caused and/or complicated by their neutropenia. This leaves surgeons in the difficult position of managing medically fragile patients with unusual presentations of common disease processes. These patients often fall outside of classical guidelines and treatment pathways. Many studies addressing these issues are retrospective and non-randomized. Here, we review common emergency gastrointestinal surgery scenarios and their management in the setting of a neutropenic patient. While biliary disease, appendicitis, anorectal disease, and perforations will be covered in detail, an extensive appreciation of a patient's medical or oncologic disease course and appropriate utilization of consultants such as interventional radiology, gastroenterology, and hematology is often necessary.

Anorectal emergencies: WSES-AAST guidelines

Anorectal emergencies comprise a wide variety of diseases that share common symptoms, i.e., anorectal pain or bleeding and might require immediate management. While most of the underlying conditions do not need inpatient management, some of them could be life-threatening and need prompt recognition and treatment. It is well known that an incorrect diagnosis is frequent for anorectal diseases and that a delayed diagnosis is related to an impaired outcome. This paper aims to improve the knowledge and the awareness on this specific topic and to provide a useful tool for every physician dealing with anorectal emergencies.The present guidelines have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. To create these guidelines, a panel of experts was designed and charged by the boards of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) to perform a systematic review of the available literature and to provide evidence-based statements with immediate practical application. All the statements were presented and discussed during the WSES-AAST-WJES Consensus Conference on Anorectal Emergencies, and for each statement, a consensus among the WSES-AAST panel of experts was reached. We structured our work into seven main topics to cover the entire management of patients with anorectal emergencies and to provide an up-to-date, easy-to-use tool that can help physicians and surgeons during the decision-making process.

Perianal sepsis in neutropaenic patients with haematological malignancies: the role of magnetic resonance imaging and surgery

BACKGROUND

Perianal sepsis occurs in up to 10% of neutropaenic patients with haematological malignancy and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The management of this condition is challenging in neutropaenic patients due to its atypical pathophysiology. The aim of this study is to assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgery in neutropaenic patients with perianal sepsis.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on all neutropenic patients with a haematological malignancy who had a diagnosis of perianal sepsis during the inpatient admission between 2008 and 2017. Patient characteristics, symptoms, haematological data, MRI result, surgical intervention, intraoperative findings and outcomes including recurrence and mortality were collected.

RESULTS

Nineteen neutropaenic patients with haematological malignancy were treated for perianal sepsis, eight (42%) patients were managed conservatively and 11 (58%) were managed surgically. Nine patients underwent MRI, which identified a collection in 88% of cases despite severe neutropaenia. In patients with a collection identified on MRI prior to surgery, 80% had a drainable collection confirmed intraoperatively. Post-operative complications included two cases of sepsis from a presumed perianal source and one death. A total of 82% of patients experienced symptom resolution after surgery compared to 88% of patients managed conservatively.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated that MRI is a useful diagnostic tool in evaluating perianal sepsis in patients with haematological malignancy, even during periods of severe neutropenia. We found that both conservative and surgical management strategies lead to resolution of symptoms.

A Novel Severity Score Index for Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Colorectal Diseases

Introduction

Abdominal and anorectal disorders may be the cause of clinical decompensation in neutropenic febrile patients, particularly those with hematologic diseases. Infection is a cause for concern for the colorectal surgeon. Some conditions have few manifestations and can lead to death within a short period of time. This study presents the novel colorectal disorder severity score for febrile neutropenic patients.

Materials and Methods

This was a case series study analyzing the medical records of 897 patients admitted to the Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Unit in a university hospital between the years 2008 and 2013. Seventy-four episodes of febrile neutropenia in 69 patients diagnosed with an abdominal or anorectal infection site were eligible for the study. The new scoring system proposed here is based on the author's clinical experience and an extensive literature review. In addition to the extensive literature review, effect measures were calculated, and a statistical analysis was performed. Based on an evaluation of common biological plausibility criteria, five factors were selected as the main predictors of hospital mortality in febrile neutropenic patients with colorectal disease.

Results

The proposed score demonstrated increased mortality as the condition worsened as reflected by an increasing score (Fisher's exact test: 0.001). When considering the logistic model for the probability of death by score level, the AUC value was 0.82 (0.72-0.925), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic value was 2.3, p = 0.806.

Conclusion

The proposed scoring system allows prediction of the likelihood of death during hospitalization for febrile neutropenic patients with an abdominal and anorectal focus. New studies on the subject are required, and the proposed scoring scale must be validated on a larger and different sample of patients.

Incision & drainage of perianal sepsis in the immunocompromised: A need for heightened postoperative awareness

BACKGROUND

Incision and drainage of perianal sepsis has appreciable success in the immunocompetent population, but outcomes after incision and drainage in the immunosuppressed population are unknown.

METHODS

13,666 patients (n = 930 immunosuppressed) undergoing incision and drainage of perianal sepsis between 2011 and 2015 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were identified. The main outcomes were major morbidity, return to the operating room, and mortality. Multivariable analysis was performed for each outcome.

RESULTS

Sepsis was the most common postoperative complication. Preoperative immunosuppression was an independent risk factor for major morbidity (odds ratio [OR]: 1.6, p < 0.01), return to the operating room (OR: 1.9, p < 0.01), and mortality (OR: 2.6, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression is an independent risk factor for major morbidity, return to the operating room, and mortality. With post-operative sepsis the most common complication, inpatient admission and extended duration antibiotic therapy is warranted in immunosuppressed patients.

Anorectal complications in patients with haematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

Anorectal complications are common in patients with haematological malignancies.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives are to characterize anorectal complications in these patients, identify risk factors and shed light on treatment, morbidity and mortality rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective, observational study that included 83 inpatients with haematological malignancies and proctological symptoms from January 2010 to September 2015 was conducted. Clinical outcomes were obtained through a detailed review of medical records.

RESULTS

The median age was 56 years, and 52 (62.7%) patients were men. Fifty-six (67.5%) patients had nonseptic anorectal complications and 27 (32.5%) patients had septic anorectal complications.

RISKS FACTORS

Patients with septic anorectal complications were more commonly male, older, and had lower absolute neutrophil counts, but the differences were not statistically significant (P=0.79, 0.67 and 0.89, respectively). In positive blood cultures [23/70 (32.9%)], Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Escherichia coli were the most common isolated agents.

TREATMENT

In nonseptic anorectal complications, conservative treatments/minor proctological procedures were adopted, and patients with septic anorectal complications were treated with antibiotics±major proctological procedures and/or surgical drainage/debridement.

RESULTS OF TREATMENT

Forty-eight (85.7%) patients in the nonseptic complications group improved compared with 23 (85.2%) patients in the septic complications group. The overall mortality rate was 2.4% (n=2), with one (1.2%) death related to perianal sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Enterococcus spp. were more commonly identified in this study and can be increasing in this specific population. In contrast to other reports, we did not identify an association between septic anorectal complications and possible risk factors such as male sex, younger age or a low absolute neutrophil count. Most patients had nonseptic anorectal complications. A major proctological procedure/surgical debridement should always be applied in septic complications, which have better prognoses now than in the past.

Typical MR imaging findings of perianal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the MR imaging findings of patients with hematologic malignancies who have symptoms suggesting perianal infection and to demonstrate the importance of imaging.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study included 36 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent anorectal MR imaging in our department between September 2011-May 2016. Two radiologists experienced in abdominal radiology viewed the MR images in consensus. Abscesses, fistulous or sinus tracts, signal alterations and contrast enhancement in keeping with an inflammation and edema in the perianal region were recorded.

RESULTS

Perianal abscess was found in 16 of the 36 patients. In 10 of these 16 patients there was also extensive inflammatory signal alterations in perianal and/or perineal soft tissues. In six of the 36 patients perianal fistula was detected. A sinus tract was seen at the level of subcutaneous external anal sphincter in one patient. Inflammatory signal alterations in the surrounding soft tissues were present in three of these seven patients. There were abscesses in labium majus in two patients and in one patient there were perineal abscesses with accompanying inflammatory signal alterations. In six of the 36 patients no abscess or fistula/sinus tract was seen. There were only inflammatory signal alterations with contrast enhancement in perianal or subcutaneous tissues. In two patients presenting with perianal pain and hemorrhoids, minimal inflammatory changes were detected on MR images. There were two patients with normal MR imaging findings.

CONCLUSION

As digital examination of the anorectum and rectoscopy are avoided in neutropenic patients, MR imaging, which clearly demonstrates the perianal pathology should be preferential.

Contemporary management of perianal conditions in febrile neutropenic patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to examine the type and frequency of perianal conditions in a contemporary series of febrile neutropenic patients and to examine the risk factors, management options and outcome of septic perianal conditions.

METHODS

Medical records of all adult febrile neutropenic patients (933 patients) who were admitted during the period from January, 2009 to December 2011 were retrospectively review. All patients with perianal complaints or conditions were included. The clinical features, management and outcome of septic conditions were recorded.

RESULTS

Of all the reviewed charts, 101 (10.8%) had perianal complaints or conditions. Most of them were non septic (74.3%), like piles and fissures, and were treated conservatively. In 26 patients the diagnosis was a septic condition: abscess (12 patients), fistula (4), inflammation (9) and necrotizing fasciitis (1). Septic conditions were more commonly found in males younger than 40 years. Surgery was done in 13 patients to drain a collection and in 2 patients to debride necrotic tissue. Most patients who had no collection had conservative management. There was 1 fatality only (3.8%) in those 26 patients.

CONCLUSION

Most of the perianal conditions in febrile neutropenic patients are non septic and are managed conservatively. Septic perianal conditions are not associated with a poor prognosis as in the past. Surgical drainage should be reserved to conditions where there is a collection; otherwise patients should be managed conservatively but with close monitoring.