Practical Considerations When Interpreting FDG PET/CT Imaging for Staging and Treatment Response Assessment in Melanoma Patients

While FDG PET/CT bears a high sensitivity and specificity for the staging of stage III and IV melanoma as well as for the purpose of melanoma recurrence detection, overall results tend to vary from one part of the body to another as well as for melanoma from cutaneous or choroidal origin. In this paper, organ or site-related differences in sensitivity and specificity in melanoma patients, both from cutaneous and choroidal origin, as well as their impact on clinical decision making are discussed. Furthermore, with the advent of immunotherapy for the treatment of malignant melanoma, post-treatment related potential false positive findings have emerged, the knowledge of which is essential for accurate treatment response assessment. These post-treatment related potential false positive findings are summarized in this paper so as to help the nuclear medicine physician in avoiding erroneous interpretation of acquired FDG PET/CT images in melanoma patients receiving immuntherapy.

PET Scan Misses Cutaneous Melanoma Metastasis with Significant Tumour Size and Tumour Thickness

BACKGROUND

Although PET-scan is an advanced, innovative and widely used method for monitoring patients with different types of cancer diseases, it is important to note that its application in patients with cutaneous melanoma is limited and should be reconsidered.

CASE REPORT

To affirm this new statement, we are presenting a case from our clinical practice of a patient with melanoma of the interdigital space (with resected in sano primary melanoma and performed complete lymphadenectomy) that showed locoregional and systemic progression in two months post operation. The PET scan performed within the second hospitalization (and before the second operation) did not detect the presence of any cutaneous metastases, which were clinically and histologically verified after the second operative procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

This data suggests that shortly more reliable and sensitive imaging methods for monitoring patients with cutaneous melanoma should be found. Having in mind that our patient has been operated twice in the area of the primary lesion (as the surgical wound underwent secondary healing), theoretically, the abundant cicatrization could have led to reduced glucose uptake in the surrounded cancerous tissue. Monitoring of a larger number of patients with locoregional metastases and surgical interventions in different locations would shed light on the observations shared by us.

Cost-effectiveness of adding FDG-PET or CT to the diagnostic work-up of patients with stage III melanoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to assess predictive value of fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and computed tomography (CT) and to analyze their cost-effectiveness in several diagnosis-treatment combinations.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of melanoma continues to rise. A proportion will present or recur with lymph node metastases (American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control stage III). To detect distant metastases, CT and/or FDG-PET are available. However, few studies have assessed their value and costs in stage III.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with melanoma with palpable, proven lymph node metastases (2003-2008) referred for examination with FDG-PET and CT were prospectively included. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. In economic evaluation, the costs of diagnostic work-up with and without FDG-PET and CT were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 253 patients with melanoma were included. FDG-PET showed a higher sensitivity than CT: 86.1% compared with 78.2%. Specificity was higher for CT (93.7%) compared with FDG-PET (93.1%). Overall, FDG-PET showed a higher PPV and NPV. Cost-consequence analysis showed that adding CT (True-Positive upstaging in 61 patients) to diagnostic work-up decreased cost by 5.5%, adding FDG-PET (True-Positive upstaging in 68 patients) increased cost by 7.2%, and adding both (True-Positive upstaging in 78 patients) increased cost by 15.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, FDG-PET had higher sensitivity and predictive value, whereas CT had a higher specificity. Adding one of these diagnostic tools improved the staging of stage III patients with less than 10% cost increase. A proposal for stage-specific use of imaging modalities for clinicians caring for patients with melanoma is presented.

Metabolic positron emission tomography imaging in cancer detection and therapy response

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a noninvasive imaging technique that provides a functional or metabolic assessment of normal tissue or disease conditions. Fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging (FDG-PET) is widely used clinically for tumor imaging due to increased glucose metabolism in most types of tumors, and has been shown to improve the diagnosis and subsequent treatment of cancers. We review its use in cancer diagnosis, staging, restaging, and assessment of response to treatment. In addition, other metabolic PET imaging agents in pre-clinical research or clinical trial stages of development are discussed, including amino acid analogs based on increased protein synthesis, and choline, which is based on increased membrane lipid synthesis. Amino acid analogs and choline are more specific to tumor cells than FDG, so they play an important role in differentiating cancers from benign conditions and in the diagnosis of cancers with low FDG uptake or high background FDG uptake. For decades, researchers have shown that tumors display altered metabolic profiles with elevated uptake of glucose, amino acids, and lipids. This can be used for cancer diagnosis and monitoring of the therapeutic response with excellent signal-to-noise ratios.