Absence of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression as a stage-dependent prognostic factor in sporadic colorectal cancers

Rate of dissemination and prognosis in early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability status: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

For the past two decades, microsatellite instability (MSI) has been reported as a robust clinical biomarker associated with survival advantage attributed to its immunogenicity. However, MSI is also associated with high-risk adverse pathological features (poorly differentiated, mucinous, signet cell, higher grade) and exhibits a double-edged sword phenomenon. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the rate of dissemination and the prognosis of early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on MSI status.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of original studies was performed on Ovid searching MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, American College of Physicians ACP Journal Club, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects DARE, Clinical Trials databases from inception of database to June 2019. Colorectal cancer, microsatellite instability, genomic instability and DNA mismatch repair were used as key words or MeSH terms. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed. Data were pooled using a random-effects model with odds ratio (OR) as the effect size. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan ver 5.3 Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS

From 5288 studies, 136 met the inclusion criteria (n = 92,035; MSI-H 11,746 (13%)). Overall, MSI-H was associated with improved OS (OR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.90), DFS (OR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.66-0.81) and DSS (OR, 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.90). Importantly, MSI-H had a protective effect against dissemination with a significantly lower rate of lymph node and distant metastases. By stage, the protective effect of MSI-H in terms of OS and DFS was observed clearly in stage II and stage III. Survival in stage I CRC was excellent irrespective of MSI status. In stage IV CRC, without immunotherapy, MSI-H was not associated with any survival benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI-H CRC was associated with an overall survival benefit with a lower rate of dissemination. Survival benefit was clearly evident in both stage II and III CRC, but MSI-H was neither a robust prognostic marker in stage I nor stage IV CRC without immunotherapy.

Prognostic Value of Mismatch Repair Genes for Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Meta-Analysis

DNA mismatch repair was proposed to play a pivotal role in the development and prognosis of colorectal cancer. However, the prognostic value of mismatch repair on colorectal cancer is still unknown. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched. The articles about mismatch repair (including hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH3, hMSH6, hPMSH1, and hPMSH2) deficiency for the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer were included in the study. The hazard ratio and its 95% confidence interval were used to measure the impact of mismatch repair deficiency on survival time. Twenty-one articles were included. The combined hazard ratio for mismatch repair deficiency on overall survival was 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.69) and that on disease-free survival was 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.75). In subgroup analysis, there were a significant association between overall survival and mismatch repair deficiency in Asian studies (hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.91) and Western studies (hazard ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.67). For disease-free survival, the hazard ratios in Asian studies and Western studies were 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.38-0.81) and 0.62 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.78), respectively. Our meta-analysis indicated that mismatch repair could be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer.

Clinical significance of chromodomain helicase/ATPase DNA binding protein 1-like and human mutL homolog 1 gene expression in cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is a highly malignant form of gastrointestinal cancer with an unfavorable prognosis. The novel oncogene chromodomain helicase/ATPase DNA binding protein 1-like (CHD1L) has been confirmed to serve a vital role in numerous types of cancer, including liver cancer. Mismatch repair (MMR) is a common DNA repair process that contributes to the preservation of the integrity and stability of genetic substances. Human mutL homolog 1 gene (hMLH1) is an important MMR protein family member. The present study aimed to evaluate the pathological and clinical features of cholangiocarcinoma, and to investigate the clinical significance of CHD1L and hMLH1 expression in cholangiocarcinoma. A total of 108 samples from cholangiocarcinoma tumor tissues and 60 samples from normal bile duct tissue were obtained from patients admitted to The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between May 2005 and May 2014. All cholangiocarcinoma cases were pathologically confirmed. The expression of CHD1L and hMLH1 was examined by immunohistochemistry analysis. The expression of CHD1L in cholangiocarcinoma (94.44%) was significantly higher than in normal bile duct tissues (40.00%). CHD1L expression was associated with gallstone history, serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level and Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage (P<0.05). hMLH1 expression in cholangiocarcinoma (77.78%) was significantly lower than in normal bile duct tissues (96.67%), and was associated with gender, age, serum CA19-9 level, the presence of hepatitis B virus surface antigen, TNM stage and tumor diameter (P<0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis indicated that the 3-year accumulative survival rates for CHD1L-positive and -negative patients differed significantly (P<0.05; 17.90 and 83.33%, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) between the 3-year accumulate survival rates for hMLH1-positive and -negative patients (38.90 and 33.30%, respectively). High CHD1L expression and low hMLH1 expression levels were observed in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, and their abnormal expression patterns were associated with the progression of malignancy and an unfavorable disease prognosis. Therefore, CHD1L and hMLH1 may be potential prognostic biomarkers for cholangiocarcinoma.

Associations of defect mismatch repair genes with prognosis and heredity in sporadic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability arises due to defect mismatch repair (MMR) and occurs in 10-20% of sporadic colorectal cancer. The purpose was to investigate correlations between defect MMR, prognosis and heredity for colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Tumour tissues from 318 patients consecutively operated for colorectal cancer were analysed for immunohistochemical expression of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 on tissue microarrays. Information on KRAS and BRAF mutation status was available for selected cases.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (15%) tumours displayed MSI. No correlation was seen between patients exhibiting MSI in the tumour and heredity (p = 0.789). Patients with proximal colon cancer and MSI had an improved cancer-specific survival (p = 0.006) and prolonged time to recurrence (p = 0.037). In a multivariate analysis including MSI status, gender, CEA, vascular and neural invasion, patients with MSS and proximal colon cancer had an impaired cancer-specific survival compared with patients with MSI (HR, 4.32; CI, 1.46-12.78). The same prognostic information was also seen in distal colon cancer; no recurrences seen in the eight patients with stages II and III distal colon cancer and MSI, but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

No correlation between MSI and heredity for colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives was seen. Patients with MSI tumours had improved survival.

Deficient DNA mismatch repair is associated with favorable prognosis in Thai patients with sporadic colorectal cancer

AIM: To determine the prognostic significance of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and BRAF V600E in Thai sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS: We studied a total of 211 out of 405 specimens obtained from newly diagnosed CRC patients between October 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007 at Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of CRC tissue samples were analyzed for dMMR by detection of MMR protein expression loss by immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-DHPLC. BRAF V600E mutational analysis was performed in DNA extracted from the same archival tissues by two-round allele-specific PCR and analyzed by high sensitivity DHPLC. Associations between patient characteristics, MMR and BRAF status with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier survival plots and log-rank test together with Cox’s proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS: dMMR and BRAF V600E mutations were identified in 31 of 208 (14.9%) and 23 of 211 (10.9%) tumors, respectively. dMMR was more commonly found in patients with primary colon tumors rather than rectal cancer (20.4% vs 7.6%, P =0.01), but there was no difference in MMR status between the right-sided and left-sided colon tumors (20.8% vs 34.6%, P = 0.24). dMMR was associated with early-stage rather than metastatic disease (17.3% vs 0%, P = 0.015). No clinicopathological features such primary site or tumor differentiation were associated with the BRAF mutation. Six of 31 (19.3%) samples with dMMR carried the BRAF mutation, while 17 of 177 (9.6%) with proficient MMR (pMMR) harbored the mutation (P = 0.11). Notably, patients with dMMR tumors had significantly superior DFS (HR = 0.30, 95%CI: 0.15-0.77; P = 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.10-0.84; P = 0.02) compared with patients with pMMR tumors. By contrast, the BRAF V600E mutation had no prognostic impact on DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION: The prevalence of dMMR and BRAF V600E in Thai sporadic CRC patients was 15% and 11%, respectively. The dMMR phenotype was associated with a favorable outcome.

Molecular markers in colorectal cancer: clinical relevance in stage II colon cancer

SUMMARY Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in developed countries. Adjuvant chemotherapy is standard for stage III colorectal cancer but its use in stage II is controversial. Several clinicopathological factors have been described to define a high-risk group among stage II colon cancers, which can aid the selection of patients who may benefit from chemotherapy. Local tumor invasion (T4), high histological grade, obstruction and perforation at diagnosis, and number of lymph nodes removed are the most widely accepted factors. Several molecular factors have been also investigated as prognostic candidate biomarkers. DNA ploidy, KRAS and TP53 mutations, thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidine phosphorylase, loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 18q and microsatellite instability have been widely investigated. The aim of this review is to analyze the current evidence and clinical applications of the classical molecular biomarkers as well as new ones such as BRAF, circulating tumor cells, genome expression signatures and DNA methylation.

FANCJ expression predicts the response to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in MLH1-proficient colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Fanconi anemia protein, FANCJ, directly interacts with MLH1, a key protein involved in DNA mismatch repair. Deficient mismatch repair, or microsatellite instability, is a potent marker for the ineffectiveness of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated the significance of FANCJ expression in CRC, focusing on the effects of 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic features and immunohistochemical expression of FANCJ and MLH1 were studied in 219 patients with CRC. We also analyzed 5-FU sensitivity in CRC cell lines with varying levels of FANCJ expression.

RESULTS

FANCJ expression was elevated in tumor tissues compared with normal epithelial tissue. High expression of FANCJ was significantly associated with 5-FU resistance measured by the SDI test (P < 0.05) and poor recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P < 0.05). Among patients with stage II/III tumors who received 5-FU, patients with tumors exhibiting high FANCJ expression had significantly worse RFS than did patients with tumors exhibiting low FANCJ expression (P < 0.01). Among patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, FANCJ expression was not correlated with RFS (P = 0.76). High FANCJ expression was correlated with 5-FU resistance in tumors with normal MLH1 expression (P < 0.05) but not in tumors not expressing MLH1 (P = 0.9). In vitro, FANCJ overexpression was correlated with 5-FU resistance in MLH1-proficient HCT116 3-6 cells but not in MLH1-deficient HCT116 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

FANCJ could be a useful biomarker to predict the response to 5-FU and prognosis of CRC, particularly in tumors with normal MLH1 expression.

MSH2 promoter hypermethylation in circulating tumor DNA is a valuable predictor of disease-free survival for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Tumor-specific alterations of DNA methylation in circulating DNA have been associated with tumor burden and malignant progression. A wealth of information indicating the potential use of DNA methylation in circulating DNA for cancer screening, prognosis and monitoring of the efficacy of anticancer therapies has emerged. In this study, we examined prospectively whether the presence of plasma DNA with tumor characteristics before oesophagectomy is a predictive factor related to disease-free survival (DFS).

METHODS

Promoter hypermethylation of MSH2 was analyzed using real-time methylation-specific PCR (real-time MSP) in paired tumor and plasma samples of 209 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

RESULTS

Aberrant MSH2 methylation was found in 101 of 209 ESCC patients. Of these 101 patients, 77 cases exhibited the same alteration in their plasma DNA. No alterations were found in the plasma DNA of the remaining 108 patients. As a control, we screened for aberrant methylation in the plasma DNA of 60 health individuals. No methylation was found in plasma DNA of these control groups. Follow-up analysis indicated significantly lower DFS for patients with high MSH2 methylation compared to those with MSH2 unmethylation after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

It was suggestted that MSH2 methylation in the plasma would be a good predictor of DFS for these ESCC patients before oesophagectomy.

Promoter methylation status of hMLH1, hMSH2, and MGMT genes in colorectal cancer associated with adenoma-carcinoma sequence

PURPOSE

Epigenetic silencing of the DNA mismatch repair genes has been poorly described in colorectal carcinomas showing the classic adenoma-carcinoma pathway of carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the methylation status of MutL homolog 1 (hMLH1), MutS homolog 2 (hMSH2), and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in a series of colorectal carcinomas that contain both adenomas and carcinomas.

METHODS

Promoter methylation of hMLH1, hMSH2, and MGMT was evaluated in normal mucosa, adenoma, and carcinoma samples from 112 colorectal cancer patients. Methylation was assessed by bisulfite modification and methylation-specific PCR. Expression of the gene products was also examined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Of the 112 adenomas, methylation was detected for hMLH1 (2, 1.8%), hMSH2 (9, 8.0%), and MGMT (38, 33.9%). In the carcinoma samples, methylation was seen in hMLH1 (2, 1.8%), hMSH2 (15, 13.4%), and MGMT (53, 47.3%). In normal mucosa, hMSH2 (6, 5.4%) and MGMT (12, 10.7%) were methylated, whereas hMLH1 was not. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed abnormal hMLH1 (14, 12.5%), hMSH2 (11, 9.8%), and MGMT (53, 47.3%) expression with a significant correlation between aberrant MGMT methylation and a loss of MGMT expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that CpG island methylation in hMSH2 and MGMT, but not hMLH1, is closely related to carcinogenesis in colorectal carcinomas presenting with a conventional adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Therefore, the detection of hMSH2 and MGMT methylation may have clinical significance in the evaluation of colon cancer patients and in tumor-specific management of the disease.

Relationship between pit patterns of colorectal polypoid lesions classified by magnifying chromoendoscopy and expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins in colorectal mucosa

AIM: To explore the relationship between pit patterns of colorectal polypoid lesions classified by magnifying chromoendoscopy and expression of human MutL homolog 1/2 (hMLH1/2) proteins in colorectal mucosa.

METHODS: Colorectal lesions in 146 patients were classified as type I to V pit patterns by magnifying chromoendoscopy using the Kudo criteria. All lesions were pathologically confirmed as nonneoplastic, adenomatous or cancerous lesions. Colorectal mucosal biopsy specimens were used to detect the expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS: A total of 256 polypoid lesions were found in 146 patients by magnifying chromoendoscopy. The rates of loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein expression increased gradually from type I to type V pit patterns in 256 polypoid lesions [hMLH1: 0.0% (0/11), 1.61% (1/62), 19.68% (25/127), 33.33% (1/3), 32.26% (10/31), 36.36%(8/22); hMSH2: 0.00% (0/11), 3.22% (2/62), 16.53% (21/127), 33.33% (1/3), 35.48% (11/31), 40.90% (9/22); all P < 0.01]. The rates of loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression were 2.70% and 4.05% in nonneoplastic lesions, 23.07% and 16.92% in adenoma lesions, and 25% and 30.76% in cancerous lesions. The rates of loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein expression were significantly higher in cancerous lesions than in adenomatous and nonneoplastic lesions (both P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the rate of loss of hMLH1 and that of hMSH2 protein expression in all lesions (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The rates of loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein expression gradually increased from type I to type V pit patterns, suggesting that mutation or functional deficiency of DNA mismatch repair genes is an early event in colorectal carcinogenesis. Lesion classification by magnifying chromoendoscopy or detection of the loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein expression can help identify precancerous and colorectal lesions from colorectal lesions.