Pleomorphic dermal sarcoma of the scalp - A single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) of the scalp is a rare tumour which is usually slow growing, but occasionally displays rapid growth and has a low rate of local recurrence. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, with or without radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to describe the surgical approach and the additional benefit of radiotherapy to the treatment of these patients.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-centre analysis of patients with PDS of the scalp that underwent surgical resection between 2007 and 2021 (n = 24). Treatment variables including depth of resection (superficial or deep to the galea aponeurotica) and adjuvant radiotherapy were investigated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included in this study. Median age was 80 (range, 52-95), with a median ASA score of 3 (2-3). Sixteen (66.6 %) patients underwent surgical resection including the galea, while the rest (n = 8) did not or was not known. Radiotherapy was given in 7 (29 %) patients in which only 3 (12.5 %) were in the galeal resection group. Reasons for radiotherapy administration were concomitant SCC found at the same area of resection and close margins. In a median follow-up of was 26.2 months (range, 13.6-102.5) there was only one recurrence event.

CONCLUSIONS

PDS of the scalp can be safely managed with a surgical resection if clear surgical margins are achieved without radiotherapy with good oncological outcomes.

Patients with first recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma that can be macroscopically completely resected can achieve comparable outcomes with that of primary patients after en bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs

The outcomes of patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) are significantly superior to those with recurrence. En bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs is recommended in primary RPS. However, whether en bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs can benefit recurrent patients or some recurrent patients is unclear. We compared the outcomes of patients with primary RPS, first recurrence (RPS-Rec1), and ≥2 recurrences (≥RPS-Rec2) to evaluate the value and criteria for en bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs in recurrent cases. We evaluated the safety of en bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs by assessing operation time, blood loss volume, postoperative morbidities (POM), and efficacy by comparing local recurrence and peritoneal metastasis (LR-PM), distant metastasis, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 101, 47, and 30 patients with primary RPS, RPS-Rec1, and ≥RPS-Rec2 were included, respectively. Recurrent RPS invaded more adjacent organs and surrounding fat tissue than primary RPS. The operation time, amount of blood loss, incidence of grade III–V POM, LR-PM rate, PFS, and OS in the RPS-Rec1 group were similar to those of the primary group, both of which were significantly superior to those of the ≥RPS-Rec2 group. Macroscopically incomplete resection and high-grade RPS rather than first recurrence were independent risk factors for LR-PM, PFS, and OS. In conclusion, the safety and efficacy of en bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs in RPS-Rec1 were comparable with those in primary RPS but significantly superior to those of ≥RPS-Rec2. For RPS-Rec1, comparable outcomes to patients with primary RPS can be achieved, particularly in those in whom a macroscopically complete resection is achieved.

Surgical Principles of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in the Era of Personalized Treatment: A Review of the Frontline Extended Surgery

Simple Summary

Surgery is the only curative treatment for localized disease in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Frontline extended surgery, or compartmental surgery, is a recent surgical strategy consisting of resecting the tumor together with adjacent organs, with the aim of minimizing marginality. This review provides a practical step by step description of this standardized procedure, tailored to histologic behavior, tumor localization, and patient condition.

Abstract

Surgery is the key treatment in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), as completeness of resection is the most important prognostic factor related to treatment. Compartmental surgery/frontline extended approach is based on soft-tissue sarcoma surgical principles, and involves resecting adjacent viscera to achieve a wide negative margin. This extended approach is associated with improved local control and survival. This surgery must be tailored to tumor histology, tumor localization, and patient performance status. We herein present a review of compartmental surgery principles, covering the oncological and technical basis, and describing the tailored approach to each tumor subtype and localization in the retroperitoneum.

Retroperitoneal and Mesenteric Liposarcomas

Retroperitoneal liposarcomas are a rare entity and are comprised mostly of the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated subtypes. Eight-year survival ranges from 30% to 80% depending on histologic subtype and grade. Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment and compartment resection is the current standard. Mesenteric liposarcomas are extremely rare and comprise more high-grade lesions, with poorer prognosis of 50% 5-year overall survival. They are managed with a similar aggressive surgical approach. This review presents the current management of retroperitoneal and mesenteric liposarcomas.

Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of rare tumors of mesenchymal origin that include several well-defined histologic subtypes. In 2015, the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published consensus recommendations for the best management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Since then, through international collaboration, new evidence and knowledge have been generated, creating the need for an updated consensus document.

METHODS

The primary aim of this study was to critically evaluate the current evidence and develop an up-to-date consensus document on the approach to these difficult tumors. The resulting document applies to primary RPS that is non-visceral in origin, with exclusion criteria as previously described. The relevant literature was evaluated and an international group of experts consulted to formulate consensus statements regarding the best management of primary RPS. A level of evidence and grade of recommendation were attributed to each new/updated recommendation.

RESULTS

Management of primary RPS was considered from diagnosis to follow-up. This rare and complex malignancy is best managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized referral center. The best chance of cure is at the time of primary presentation, and an individualized management plan should be made based on the 29 consensus statements included in this article, which were agreed upon by all of the authors. Whenever possible, patients should be enrolled in prospective trials and studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing international collaboration is critical to expand upon current knowledge and further improve outcomes of patients with RPS. In addition, prospective data collection and participation in multi-institution trials are strongly encouraged.

Role of neoadjuvant Radio-Chemotherapy for retroperitoneal Liposarcoma in primary and secondary surgical intervention

Abstract Background: Approximately 30–40 % of all retroperitoneal soft tissue tumors are sarcomas with liposarcoma prevailing in approximately 50% of these cases. Retroperitoneal liposarcomas typically show a high rate of local recurrence and late distant metastases. The aim of our retrospective analysis was to investigate the efficacy of treatment in our patients with liposarcoma. Methods: Thirty-four consecutive patients underwent surgery in our clinic between October 2004 and November 2017. Liposarcomas arising from the mesenteric or abdominal adipose tissue or the pelvis were excluded. In 2011 we had introduced neo-adjuvant therapy according to IAWS-Guidelines in patients younger than seventy without severe comorbidities to pretreatement. Results: Out of 34 patients, 23 (67,6%) presented with primary and 11 (32,4%) with recurrent disease. In 8 of the 27 patients (30 %), a radical resection (R0) could be achieved, and in 17 patients (63%) resection was marginal (R1). Time to recurrence was not affected by neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Patients that underwent systemic chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy developed earlier recurrences (p = 0.016). Overall survival appeared to be better in the neoadjuvant group but was not significant (0.080) Conclusions: Combining surgical resection with neoadjuvant radiation treatment showed survival benefits in primary but not recurrent disease. Repeated surgery stays a valid approach in carefully selected patients but all patients should be referred to a center of expertise in multimodal treatment approaches for retroperitoneal liposarcomas.

Update in pelvic and retroperitoneal sarcoma management: The role of compartment surgery

Surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas should be "en bloc" compartmental, which involves resection of unaffected organs. Its upfront use is key, providing a high percentage of resections with negative margins, resulting in a better local control and increased survival in many patients. Preservation of organs should be done in an individualized manner, especially in the pelvic location, and adapted to the histological aggressiveness of the tumor. Preoperative biopsy is able to establish the diagnosis of sarcoma subtype and consequently an adequate perioperative strategy. These patients should be managed by expert surgeons at referral centers with multidisciplinary units and oncology committees. The use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is not yet well defined, so it is only recommended at referral centers with clinical trials. Currently, this is the only option to offer the best morbidity and mortality rates, as well as possible improvements in the survival of these patients.

[Systematic surgery of retroperitoneal sarcomas : Imaging-guided planning of surgical strategy]

Abdominal and retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent approximately 25-30% of all soft tissue sarcomas, if besides typical retroperitoneal tumors gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are also included. The surgical R0 en bloc resection with histopathologically free margins is basically the only potentially curative treatment procedure. When planning the surgical strategy, the histopathological subtype and tumor localization are pivotal. The extent of resection should be guided by the goal to reach an en bloc resection with histopathologically negative margins. Due to the frequently found vast dimensions of RPS and ultimately topographic proximity to vital structures at primary diagnosis, R0 resections are not always achievable. Despite the introduction of multimodal treatment regimens and the development of standardized extended surgical procedures, such as systematic retroperitoneal compartmental resection (SRCR), local recurrences remain the most common cause of tumor-associated death. Finally, the results of the transatlantic RPS working group (TARPSWG) could show that treatment of RPS in specialized high-volume centers contributes to better long-term survival. Particularly in Germany there is an urgent demand for centralization of sarcoma patient treatment.

Historical perspectives and future directions in the surgical management of retroperitoneal sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) have fascinated and intrigued physicians both past and present. Operative mortality rates were historically very high and complete resection was not possible for the majority of patients until only the last 2 decades. More recently, changes to the surgical approach and clinical decision-making in RPS have improved patient outcomes. With select integration of nonsurgical therapies, continued RPS-specific research, and ongoing collaborative efforts among major referral centers, the future appears promising.

Liposarcoma: Multimodality Management and Future Targeted Therapies

There are 3 biologic groups of liposarcoma: well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma, myxoid/round cell liposarcoma, and pleomorphic liposarcoma. In all 3 groups, complete surgical resection is central in treatment aimed at cure and is based on grade. Radiation can reduce risk of local recurrence in high-grade lesions or minimize surgical morbidity in the myxoid/round cell liposarcoma group. The groups differ in chemosensitivity, so adjuvant chemotherapy is selectively used in histologies with metastatic potential but not in the resistant subtype dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Improved understanding of the genetic aberrations that lead to liposarcoma initiation is allowing for the rapid development of targeted therapies for liposarcoma.

Histology-based Classification Predicts Pattern of Recurrence and Improves Risk Stratification in Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic significance of histologic type/subtype in a large series of patients with primary resected retroperitoneal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND

The histologic diversity and rarity of retroperitoneal sarcoma has hampered the ability to predict patient outcome.

METHODS

From a single-institution, prospective database, 675 patients treated surgically for primary, nonmetastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma during 1982 to 2010 were identified and histologic type/subtype was reviewed. Clinicopathologic variables were analyzed for association with disease-specific death (DSD), local recurrence (LR), and distant recurrence (DR).

RESULTS

Median follow-up for survivors was 7.5 years. The predominant histologies were well-differentiated liposarcoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma. Five-year cumulative incidence of DSD was 31%, and factors independently associated with DSD were R2 resection, resection of 3 or more contiguous organs, and histologic type. Five-year cumulative incidence for LR was 39% and for DR was 24%. R1 resection, age, tumor size, and histologic type were independently associated with LR; size, resection of 3 or more organs, and histologic type were independently associated with DR. Liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma were associated with late recurrence and DSD (as long as 15 years from diagnosis). For solitary fibrous tumor, LR was uncommon (<10%), but early distant recurrence was common (36% at 5 years). Nomograms were developed to predict DSD, LR, and DR.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologic type/subtype is the most important independent predictor of DSD, LR, and DR in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. Histology predicts the pattern and incidence of LR and DR and will aid in more accurate patient counseling and selection of patients for adjuvant therapy trials.

The importance of surgical margins in retroperitoneal sarcoma

Surgery is the "gold-standard" treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas, but local recurrence is common, and can cause disease-related death. Complete gross resection is associated with improved survival, but debate exists as to whether resection of adjacent organs to improve margins or prescription of neoadjuvant radiation leads to better outcomes. This review summarizes data addressing prognostic value of margin, extent of surgery necessary to optimize treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas, and role of histology in optimizing therapy.

Long-term morbidity after multivisceral resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma

Background

More than 60 per cent of patients treated surgically for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma survive for at least 5 years. Extended surgical resection has been proposed for primary disease, but long-term morbidity data are lacking. A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the long-term morbidity of patients undergoing surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Methods

Patients operated on between January 2002 and December 2011 were eligible for the study. Long-term morbidity was evaluated based on a semistructured clinical interview. Lower limb function was assessed by means of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), a self-report questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0 (low functioning) to 80 (high functioning). Pain was investigated by means of the Brief Pain Inventory – Short Form, with pain intensity scores reported on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Results

Some 243 patients underwent surgery, and 101 of 160 patients who were alive at the time of the investigation responded to the study invitation letter. Finally, 95 patients were enrolled in the study. Sensory impairment of the limbs was reported in 72 patients (76 per cent). The median LEFS score was 60 (i.q.r. 43–73). Mean scores for the pain intensity items varied from 1·23 to 2·68. In multivariable analysis, there was no difference in median levels of creatinine at survey between patients who did or did not undergo nephrectomy (difference between median values 13 (95 per cent c.i. −4 to 30) µmol/l; P = 0·170).

Conclusion

Severe chronic pain and lower limb motor impairment after multivisceral resection for retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare. Long-term renal function is not significantly impaired when nephrectomy is performed.

Locoregional disease patterns in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma: implications for the extent of resection?

BACKGROUND

Well-differentiated (WD)/dedifferentiated (DD) liposarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum. The frequency of distant metastasis is low and the major burden of disease is locoregional. We sought to define the patterns of locoregional disease to help guide surgical decision making.

METHODS

Data were collected from 247 patients with de novo or recurrent tumors treated at our institution from 1993 to early 2012. The number and location of tumors at both initial presentation and subsequent locoregional recurrence were determined by combined analysis of operative dictations and radiologic imaging.

RESULTS

Thirty-four percent of patients had multifocal locoregional disease (two or more tumors) at initial presentation to our institution, including 9 % who had tumors at synchronous remote retroperitoneal sites. The impact of multifocal disease on overall survival was dependent on histologic subtype (WD vs. DD) and disease presentation (de novo vs. recurrence) at the time of resection. Among patients with initial unifocal disease, 57 % progressed to multifocal locoregional disease with subsequent recurrence, including 11 % with new tumors outside of the original resection field. No clinicopathologic or treatment-related variable, including the type or extent of resection, was predictive of either multifocal or 'outside field' progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Multifocal disease is common in patients with WD/DD retroperitoneal liposarcoma, and tumors can also develop at remote, locoregional sites. Surgical resection remains the primary method of locoregional control in this disease; however, the aggressiveness of resection should be individualized, with consideration of both tumor and patient-related factors.

Management of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma

Approximately 15% of soft tissue sarcomas are retroperitoneal. The occult location and anatomic complexity results in local recurrences in the majority of patients. Predictors of recurrence include histological subtype, completeness of resection, and the hospital case volume. The most significant predictor of outcome following local recurrence is the resectability of the recurrent disease. An understanding of the implication of tumor biology on outcomes is essential in determining optimal management for patients with recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Diagnosis and management of leiomyosarcoma arising from ovarian vein: case report and literature review

Primary leiomyosarcomas arising from the ovarian vein are extremely rare and are associated with high morbidity. A 49-year-old nulliparous woman presented with a left lower abdominal mass. Although extremely rare, the radiological appearance is able to preoperatively identify malignant retroperitoneal masses, such as leiomyosarcomas originating from the ovarian vein; thus, the patient underwent a simple total excision of the mass-adjacent organs, as well as complete resection of the uterus, bilateral adnexae and the left ovarian vein. Adjuvant postoperative combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel was administered. At 22 months, she had no recurrence or metastasis. Delayed diagnosis and high metastatic potentiality are associated with the high morbidity of vascular leiomyosarcomas. The preoperative radiological appearance is useful for early diagnosis, and radical treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine and docetaxel may improve the poor prognosis of patients with leiomyosarcoma arising from the ovarian vein.