Complication Differences Between the Tumescent and Non-Tumescent Dissection Techniques for Mastectomy: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose

We conducted a systematic literature search and pooled data from studies to compare the incidence of complications between the tumescent and non-tumescent techniques for mastectomy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, BioMed Central, Ovid, and CENTRAL databases for studies comparing the two mastectomy techniques up to November 1^st, 2020. We used a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Nine studies were included with one randomized controlled trial (RCT). Meta-analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in the incidence of total skin necrosis (OR 1.18 95% CI 0.71, 1.98 I² = 82% p=0.52), major skin necrosis (OR 1.58 95% CI 0.69, 3.62 I² = 71% p=0.28), minor skin necrosis (OR 1.11 95% CI 0.43, 2.85 I² = 72% p=0.83), hematoma (OR 1.19 95% CI 0.80, 1.79 I² = 4% p=0.39), and infections (OR 0.87 95% CI 0.54, 1.40 I² = 54% p=0.56) between tumescent and non-tumescent groups. Analysis of studies using immediate alloplastic reconstruction revealed no statistically significant difference in the incidence of explantation between the two groups (OR 0.78 95% CI 0.46, 1.34 I² = 62% p=0.37). Multivariable-adjusted ORs on total skin necrosis were available from three studies. Pooled analysis indicated no statistically significant difference between tumescent and non-tumescent groups (OR 1.72 95% CI 0.72, 4.13 I² = 87% p=0.23).

Conclusion

Low-quality evidence derived mostly from non-randomized studies is indicative of no difference in the incidence of skin necrosis, hematoma, seroma, infection, and explantation between the tumescent and non-tumescent techniques of mastectomy. There is a need for high-quality RCTs to further strengthen the evidence.

Tumescent technique versus electrocautery mastectomy: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Danish women. In 2016 about 1450 (31%) Danish breast cancer patients had a mastectomy. The aim was to compare the frequency of postoperative complications in two methods of surgery, electrocautery dissection and tumescent technique, when performing a mastectomy.

METHODS

Open randomized controlled trial of all consecutive primary breast cancer or DCIS female patients who underwent either a simple mastectomy or a modified radical mastectomy in Vejle Hospital, from January 2012 to October 2017. Primary outcomes were seroma production, bleeding, infection and necrosis. Secondary outcomes were duration of surgery and delay of adjuvant treatment caused by complications. Categorical outcome variables were compared between randomization groups using chi-square of Fisher exact test and continuous outcome variables by using Wilcoxon rank test. All analyses were performed at a 5% two-sided significance level.

RESULTS

357 patients met the inclusion criteria. 14 had bilateral mastectomy, i.e. 371 breasts. The two randomization groups consisted of 105 patients/107 breasts operated by tumescent technique and 98 patients/102 breasts operated by electrocautery technique. Tumescent technique produced more seroma though not significant (p = 0.631) (mean 605 vs. 630 ml). Bleeding in the tumescent group was 10.3% vs. 5.9% in the electrocautery group (p = 0.245). Infection (5.9% vs. 7.5% p = 0.645) and necrosis (4.9% vs. 4.7% p = 0.938) was uncommon with no difference between the intervention groups. Infection was most common cause of delay of adjuvant treatment; 3.9% in the electrocautery technique group. No significant difference in duration of surgery (p = 0.392).

CONCLUSION

Both techniques are equally safe for simple and modified radical mastectomy.

The Use of Hydrodissection in Nipple- and Skin-sparing Mastectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Hydrodissection (HD) is a method to create a subcutaneous and prepectoral plane during mastectomy using a mixture of crystalloid solution with local anesthetic and epinephrine. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative complications and surgical outcomes of this technique compared with standard mastectomy.

Mastectomy flap necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction: An evaluation of tumescence and sharp dissection technique on surgical outcomes

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate implant-based reconstruction has better esthetic outcomes and improved patient satisfaction, in addition to being oncologically safe. A known complication of NSM is skin flap necrosis. The use of tumescence and sharp dissection may decrease this complication compared to the standard NSM technique using electrocautery. This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent a NSM between 2014 and 2017 at a regional cancer center. Tumescence with sharp dissection was compared to electrocautery. The primary outcome was skin flap necrosis. The secondary outcomes were operative time and management of the complication. A total of 62 patients underwent a NSM with 116 breasts being operated on. Full-thickness necrosis occurred more frequently in the standard electrocautery group (12.8%) compared to the tumescence and sharp dissection group (1.3%; P = 0.02). Partial-thickness necrosis also occurred more frequently in the standard group (33.3%) compared to the sharp dissection group (13.0%; P = 0.01). The operative time was significantly shorter in the sharp dissection group with the mean (SD) time being 183.5 (48.9) minutes compared to the standard electrocautery group at 202.9 (33.8) minutes (P = 0.03). NSM using tumescence and sharp dissection have a lower rate of the complications of partial- and full-thickness necrosis. Shorter operative time was also seen with the tumescent technique.

Stepwise En Bloc Resection of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma with Oncologic Considerations

Guidelines published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network state that standard of care treatment for the majority of patients with breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is surgical resection. This cancer is generally indolent, and if confined to the capsule, curative treatment is usually surgery alone. An en bloc resection involves a total capsulectomy, explantation, complete excision of associated masses, and excision of any involved lymph node(s). Patients with surgical control of disease have favorable long-term overall and event-free survival. Oncologic principles should be applied when resecting BIA-ALCL, and a complete oncologic resection is essential to cure patients of the disease. Incomplete resections, partial capsulectomies, and positive margins are all associated with high rates of disease recurrence and have potential for progression of the disease. Routine sentinel lymph node biopsy is unnecessary and full axillary lymph node dissection is rarely indicated except in cases of proven involvement of multiple nodes. Lymphoma oncology consultation and disease staging by imaging is performed prior to surgery. Importantly, en bloc resection is indicated only for an established diagnosis of BIA-ALCL, and is not recommended for merely suspicious or prophylactic surgeries. The purpose of this article was to demonstrate a stepwise approach to surgical ablation of BIA-ALCL with an emphasis on oncologic considerations critical to disease prognosis.

Nipple sparing mastectomy techniques: a literature review and an inframammary technique

Nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) has quickly become an accepted technique for patients with selected cancers and for risk reducing surgery. Much of its surgical acceptance over the last decade has been based on the low risk of nipple areolar complex (NAC) occurrence in breast cancer patients. Improved patient satisfaction due to improved cosmetic outcomes with reconstruction have also driven its popularity. We reviewed current English journals to determine the NSM techniques which achieve the lowest complications, best outcomes, and best patient satisfaction. We researched studies showing reductions in complications with improved surgical techniques and patient selection which have been implicated in improved results. In the studies reviewed, incision placement, away from the nipple, resulted in the lowest rates of ischemic nipple complications and the best cosmetic outcomes. The effect of other factors such as surgeon experience and thickness of skin flap development were more difficult to prove. Leaving a 2-3 mm rim of tissue around the nipple bundle was shown to help preserve the nipple vascularity. Lower complication rates with improved outcomes and patient satisfaction were reported in the literature in patients with B or smaller cup sizes, non-smokers, and patients with lower body mass index (BMI). Incision placement, away from the nipple, with preservation of a 2-3 mm rim of tissue around the nipple bundle along with careful patient selection were the most significant variables reviewed which helped to lower complications rates of NSM. Coordinated surgical planning with the breast and plastic surgeons to determine the best surgical approach for each individual patient is necessary to obtain the best results. Although short-term oncologic follow-up seems to be acceptable, longer follow-up will still be needed to define the best breast cancer surgical candidates for the nipple sparing approach.

Tumescent mastectomy: the current indications and operative tips and tricks

Background

Tumescent mastectomy refers to usage of a mixture of lidocaine and epinephrine in a diluting saline solution that makes flaps firm and tense, thus minimizing systemic drugs toxicity and making surgery possible with minimal bleeding. This technique is very useful in elder women and those with American Society of Anesthesiologists; score III and IV. The objective was to establish an alternative safe technique to general anesthesia in some selected mastectomy patients.

Patients and methods

Twenty candidate women for total mastectomy and axillary dissection were enrolled and consented to participate. After preparation, an anatomically directed infiltration was made under sedation, using a cocktail of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and epinephrine, followed after 20 minutes by the surgical incision and completion of mastectomy. All intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded.

Results

Although 7 cases required added analgesic medications, no conversion for general anesthesia was recorded. Mean operative time was 81±15.8 minutes. Mean blood loss was 95.8±47.5 mL. There was no recorded intraoperative hemodynamic instability. Postoperative visual analog score was not exceeding 4 till the end of the first 24 hours. Opioids were not required in any case, and the mean dosage of Ketorolac used was 30±8.75 mg. Drains output and the incidence of postoperative complications were acceptable.

Conclusion

We can consider tumescent mastectomy in well-selected patients a safe alternative for performing mastectomy when general anesthesia is hazardous, with minimal blood loss and long lasting postoperative analgesia without an additive effect on the operative time, hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Cannula-Assisted Flap Elevation (CAFE): a novel technique for developing flaps during skin-sparing mastectomies

BACKGROUND

One of the most challenging procedures in breast surgery is the skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). Various techniques and incisions have evolved that characterize this procedure; however, what is common in all of them is the smaller the incision, the more difficult it is to develop the skin flaps.

METHODS

A procedure was developed that incorporates the use of liposuction cannulas (without suction) to create the skin flaps. The technique and results are described in this manuscript.

RESULTS

From October of 2012 to April 2014, 289 mastectomies (171 patients) were performed using the CAFE procedure on women of all shapes and sizes. Postoperatively, no problems were experienced with flap viability using this technique. The main difference in side effects between the CAFE technique and other standard techniques for developing flaps in SSMs was more bruising than normal, but this resolved rapidly. The results for use of this technique were consistently impressive. The learning curve for this procedure is very short, especially for those who perform SSMs using sharp technique (scissors). Residents and fellows became proficient with the CAFE technique in a relatively short amount of time. Plastic surgeons were pleased with the cosmetic outcomes of their reconstructions that follow this type of mastectomy. Patients were extremely satisfied with their reconstructions as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating the use of liposuction cannulas (without suction) makes the creation of flaps for SSM a relatively simple and rapid method. It is especially useful to assist in developing skin flaps with even the smallest of skin incisions.

Tumescent technique does not increase the risk of complication following mastectomy with immediate reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing interest in the advantages of tumescent mastectomy technique, there remain concerns that tumescent solution may increase postoperative complication rates. This study evaluates patient outcomes following tumescent mastectomy in the setting of immediate prosthetic reconstruction.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 1,491 breasts (1,030 patients) treated by 4 oncologic and 2 reconstructive surgeons between 2004 and 2012 at a single institution. The primary outcomes of interest included seroma, hematoma, infection, and mastectomy flap necrosis, as well as conversion to autologous reconstruction. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted influence of tumescence on outcomes.

RESULTS

The tumescent cohort (n = 890 breasts) was younger and experienced lower rates of preoperative radiation than the nontumescent cohort (n = 601 breasts). Mean follow-up was 21.2 months. While tumescent procedures were on average 20 min faster, postoperative complication rates did not significantly differ between cohorts. Regression analysis controlling for potential confounders, including differences in surgeon technique, failed to identify tumescent mastectomy as an independent risk factor for complication [odds ratio (OR) = 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.8-1.8, p = 0.385]. Individually, neither seroma, hematoma, infection, nor flap necrosis was affected significantly by the use of tumescence (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 0.73-3.78, p = 0.229; OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.42-2.95, p = 0.837; OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.4-1.75, p = 0.689; OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.7-2.03, p = 0.67, respectively).

DISCUSSION

This longitudinal study is well equipped to assess the influence of tumescent mastectomy technique in the hands of experienced and high-volume oncologic surgeons on postoperative outcomes. Our analysis suggests that in the setting of an immediate prosthetic reconstruction, tumescent mastectomy does not independently affect postoperative complication rates.