What is the incidence of metastatic lymph node involvement after significant pathologic response of primary tumor following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer?

Exploring the correlation between Tom1L1 and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally progressive mid-low rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the specificity of Target of Myb1-Like1 (Tom1L1) expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma tissues and analyze the predictive value of Tom1L1 in the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The cancerous tissues and paracancerous normal tissues of 102 patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma without treatment were selected; quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), Western blot and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were adopted to validate the expression level of Tom1L1 in the two groups. Furthermore, 34 patients with locally progressive mid-low rectal adenocarcinoma, who were treated with neoadjuvant Xelox chemotherapy prior to the operation, IHC was adopted to detect the expression of Tom1L1 protein in patients before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to analyze the relationship between the expression level of Tom1L1 and the sensitivity of neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

The results of qPCR, Western blot and IHC showed that the expression of Tom1L1 in colorectal adenocarcinoma tissues was significantly higher than that in paracancerous normal tissues, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01); Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly more effective in patients with low expression of Tom1L1 protein than in those with high expression of Tom1L1 protein, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Tom1L1 is highly expressed in colorectal adenocarcinoma tissues; neoadjuvant Xelox chemotherapy can have an impact on Tom1L1 expression in progressive rectal cancer; patients with locally progressive mid-low rectal adenocarcinoma who have low Tom1L1 expression are more sensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Significant Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Therapy and Curative Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer: Surgical and Oncological Outcomes From a Retrospective Cohort Study

AIM

This study evaluated surgical complication rates, recurrence-free survival, overall survival (OS), and stoma status of patients with rectal cancer after significant pathologic response following neoadjuvant treatment and curative resection. Pathologic complete response (pCR) and near-pCR patients constitute patients in our study.

METHODS

Included was a retrospective cohort study of patients with rectal cancer who were diagnosed between July 2011 and September 2022 and who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection.

RESULTS

Of 696 patients with rectal cancer, 149 (21.4%) cases achieved significant pathologic response. During the 64 (70.5) months of follow-up, recurrence occurred in 16.1% of patients and distant metastases account for the majority of them. Age (p = 0.014) and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.016) were significantly related to the occurrence of recurrence. The five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS rates were obtained at 83% and 87%, respectively. Although age and surgical technique were significant factors in univariate Cox regression analysis, none of the candidate variables were significant prognostic factors for RFS in the multiple models. The risk of surgical complications remained in these patients. The most frequent complication attributed to infection (20.8%). Despite the 24.8% presence of permanent stoma at primary surgery, more than 50% of our patients lived without stoma at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our recurrence rate was about 16%, and it was related to age and adjuvant chemotherapy. These patients achieved over 80% rates of five-year RFS and OS. No significant prognostic factors were found on RFS in the multivariable model. As a matter of course, the risk of surgical complications and permanent stoma has still remained in these patients.

The Norwegian Watch and Wait study: Norwait for rectal cancer. A report from a failed study-a word of caution

The paucity of prospective data on the subject of Watch and Wait for rectal cancer prompted the implementation of Norwait, a population-based study including rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of clinical complete response (cCR) and quantify the regrowth rates. Norwait was a prospective population-based observational study with ethical approval (2017/935) registered at clinicaltrials.com (NTC03402477). Residents of Norway with histologically proven rectal cancer located within 15 cm from anal verge were eligible following completion of radiotherapy or chemoradiation at seven hospitals. cCR was the disappearance of tumour and of any ulcer with/without the appearance of whitening of prior tumour site and telangiectasia evaluated at 12 weeks by digital rectal exam, and endoscopic imaging. The study aimed to include 100 cCR patients with regrowth rates as primary endpoint. The data are presented in crude form. Eighty-two patients were included in seven hospitals from 2018 to 2020 when the study was terminated. Fifty-one patients were included in six hospitals, whereas protocol violations were identified in one hospital, where thirty-one (rather than protocol-estimated 12) patients were enrolled. Amongst the 31 patients, there were only 2 with documented cCR. Of the latter 29, there were 16 with ulcer or persistent tumour, and 13 without any documentation of cCR. Of these, 23 underwent surgery with a delay up to 50 weeks. At median 54-month follow-up of 31 patients, there were 77% local regrowths (n = 23), 40% metachronous metastases (n = 12) and 23% deaths (n = 7). At median 54-month follow-up of 51 cCR patients, there were 53% local regrowths (n = 27), 14% metachronous metastases (n = 7) and 4% deaths (n = 2). Norwait admonishes a word of caution reaching beyond the inconclusive results of a population-based study jeopardised by serious violation to protocol and legislation for conducting safe research.

Nonoperative management and local excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer

Locally advanced extraperitoneal rectal cancer represents a significant clinical challenge, and currently, the standard treatment is based on neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by radical surgical resection with total mesorectal excision (TME). In the last 30 years, its management has undergone significant changes due to the improvement of complementary radio- and chemotherapy treatments, the improvement of minimally invasive surgical approaches and the diffusion of organ-sparing approaches, such as nonoperative management, commonly called "watch and wait" (NOM) and local excision (LE), in highly selected patients who achieve a major or complete response to neoadjuvant CRT. This review aimed to critically examine the efficacy and oncological safety of NOM and LE compared to those of standard TME in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant CRT. Both the pros and cons of these approaches were strictly analyzed, providing a comprehensive and critical overview of these novel management strategies for rectal cancer.

Does neoadjuvant rectal score predict treatment outcomes better than the all grading systems used in neoadjuvantly treated rectal cancer?

BACKGROUND

/Objective: To compare the prognostic value of the yield pathologic (yp) stage, used 4 tumor regression grading (TRG) systems, and neoadjuvant rectal score(NARS) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received long-term neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2017, we included 302 patients with LARC who treated with nCRT. Postoperative pathological responses were graded by using Dworak, American Joint Committee on Cancer, Mandart, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, grading systems and NARS([5ypN-3(kT-pT)+12]2/9,61) calculations. Their results were compared in terms of treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 51 months (range 5-136). There was a significant relation between cT stage and the response in used grading systems(p < 0,001). Median overall(OS), local recurrence free(LRFS), and distant metastasis free(MFS) survival rates were 50, 48, and 45 months, respectively. 5-year OS, LRFS, and MFS rates were 71%, 92%, and 72%, respectively. According to the NARS and treatment response grating systems, a significant difference was found between the low risk and high risk groups in terms of OS, LRFS, and MFS rates. While it was not seen any difference in terms of OS and MFS, NARS was found to predict LRFS better than other grading systems. In multivariate analysis, high NARS was found to be correlated with worse OS and worse MFS. On the other hand, pCR was the another important factor affecting treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

While used systems except NARS group patients according to ypT status in surgical tissue, NARS add the value of ypN status in addition to ypT status. It could be suggested to use NARS to predict LRFS.

Multiparametric MRI-based Radiomics approaches on predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of multiparametric MRI-based radiomics on predicting response to nCRT in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

This study enrolled 193 patients with pathologically confirmed LARC who received nCRT treatment between Apr. 2014 and Jun. 2018. All patients underwent baseline T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W) and T2-weighted fat-suppression (T2FS) MRI scans before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Radiomics features were extracted and selected from the MRI data to establish the radiomics signature. Important clinical predictors were identified by Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test. The nomogram integrating the radiomics signature and important clinical predictors was constructed using multivariate logistic regression. Prediction capabilities of each model were assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Performance of the nomogram was evaluated by its calibration and potential clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

For the prediction of good response (GR) and pathologic complete response (pCR), the developed radiomics signature comprising 10 and 7 features, respectively, were significantly associated with the therapeutic response to nCRT. The nomogram incorporating the radiomics signature and important clinical predictors (CEA and CA19-9 for predicting GR; CEA, posttreatment length and posttreatment thickness for predicting pCR) achieved favorable prediction efficacy, with AUCs of 0.918 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.867-0.971, Sen = 0.972, Spe = 0.828) and 0.944 (95% CI: 0.891-0.997, Sen = 0.943, Spe = 0.828) in the training and validation cohort for predicting GR, respectively; with AUCs of 0.959 (95% CI: 0.927-0.991, Sen = 1.000, Spe = 0.833) and 0.912 (95% CI: 0.843-0.982, Sen = 1.000, Spe = 0.815) in the training and validation cohort for predicting pCR, respectively. Decision curve analysis confirmed potential clinical usefulness of our nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the MRI-based radiomics nomogram is predictive of response to nCRT and can be considered as a promising tool for facilitating treatment decision-making for patients with LARC.

Prognostic Impact of the Neoadjuvant Rectal Score as Compared With the Tumor Regression Grade and Yield Pathologic TNM Stage in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

The present study compared the prognostic value of the yield pathologic (yp) stage, tumor regression grade (TRG), and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For the assessment of tumor regression, the Dworak grading system was used. The NAR score was calculated using the following equation: (5ypN-3[cT-ypT]+12)²÷9.61.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, the NAR score and ypTNM stage were significantly associated with DFS [hazard ratio (HR)=2.514, p<0.001 and HR=3.200, p<0.001] and OS (HR=2.292, p=0.001 and HR=2.859, p<0.001), whereas the TRG was significantly associated with only DFS (HR=2.008, p=0.017). In multivariate analysis, the ypTNM stage was the only independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR=3.796, p<0.001) and OS (HR=3.591, p=0.0034).

CONCLUSION

Only the ypTNM stage was significantly associated with survival outcomes in multivariate analysis, suggesting that it is the most powerful prognostic factor of nCRT in patients with LARC.

Prognostic importance of lymph node count and ratio in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Results from a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of lymph node count (LNC) and lymph node ratio (LNR) in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

Patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT and total mesorectal excision (TME) for Stage I-III rectal cancer were selected from a cross-sectional study including 71 Dutch centres. Primary outcome parameters were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic significance of LNC and LNR (cut-off values 0.15, 0.20, 0.30) was tested for different (sub)groups.

RESULTS

From 2095 registered patients, 458 were included, of which 240 patients with LNC < 12 and 218 patients with LNC ≥ 12. LNC was not significantly associated with DFS (p = 0.35) and OS (p = 0.59). In univariable analysis, LNR was significantly associated with DFS and OS in the whole cohort and LNC subgroups, but not in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

LNC was not associated with long-term oncological outcome in rectal cancer patients treated with CRT, nor was LNR when corrected for N-stage. However, LNR might be used to identify subgroups of node-positive patients with a favourable outcome.

The Feasibility of Patient-Specific Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring throughout Multi-Modality Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal and Rectal Cancer: A Potential Biomarker for Early Detection of Subclinical Disease

As non-operative management (NOM) of esophageal and rectal cancer is becoming more prevalent, blood-biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may provide clinical information in addition to endoscopy and imaging to aid in treatment decisions following chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In this feasibility study, we prospectively collected plasma samples from locally advanced esophageal (n = 3) and rectal cancer (n = 2) patients undergoing multimodal neoadjuvant therapy to assess the feasibility of serial ctDNA monitoring throughout neoadjuvant therapy. Using the Dual-Index Degenerate Adaptor-Sequencing (DIDA-Seq) error-correction method, we serially interrogated plasma cell-free DNA at 28-41 tumor-specific genomic loci throughout therapy and in surveillance with an average limit of detection of 0.016% mutant allele frequency. In both rectal cancer patients, ctDNA levels were persistently elevated following total neoadjuvant therapy with eventual detection of clinical recurrence prior to salvage surgery. Among the esophageal cancer patients, ctDNA levels closely correlated with tumor burden throughout and following neoadjuvant therapy, which was associated with a pathologic complete response in one patient. In this feasibility study, patient- and tumor-specific ctDNA levels correlated with clinical outcomes throughout multi-modality therapy suggesting that serial monitoring of patient ctDNA has the potential to serve as a highly sensitive and specific biomarker to risk-stratify esophageal and rectal cancer patients eligible for NOM. Further prospective investigation is warranted.

Pathologic Complete Response Despite Nodal Yield Has Best Survival in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the ability of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCR) to diminish lymph node yield (LNY) and how that relationship is influenced by tumor response in patients undergoing proctectomy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with rectal adenocarcinomas from 2004 to 2014. Patients that received nCR were compared with those that underwent surgery alone. LNY was stratified into <12 and ≥12 groups to determine their differences in stage specific overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 56,812 patients 46.5% underwent surgery alone and 53.5% were administered nCR. There were more patients with LNY<12 in the nCR group compared to surgery alone, across all stages (44.1% versus 36.5%, P < 0.001). nCR improved OS regardless of LNY (P < 0.001). Although patients with LNY≥12 had improved overall survival, patients who had a pathologic complete response (pCR) achieved the greatest survival. In patients that did not achieve a pCR, LNY≥12 was a marker of improved OS but LNY did not impact OS in patients that attained pCR (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although nCR diminished LNY, LNY≥12 improved OS demonstrating the importance of quality total mesorectal excision. However, LNY did not impact patients that achieved pCR. These patients, who achieved the best OS, demonstrated that tumors' biologic response to nCR had the greatest impact on patient outcomes.

The potential predictive value of tumor budding for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer

Purpose

This study was conducted to investigate the potential predictive value of tumor budding for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Patients and methods

Surgical specimens of 128 ypUICC (Union for International Cancer Control) stage 0–III mid-to-low rectal cancer patients were identified from a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database and classified into two groups using the 10 high-power field average method: none/mild tumor budding (BD-0) and moderate/severe tumor budding (BD-1). Overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS), and recurrence estimates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. For RFS, a multivariable Cox’s proportional hazards regression analysis was performed.

Results

No (n = 20) or mild (n = 27) tumor budding (BD-0) was identified in 47 (37%) and moderate (n = 52) or severe (n = 29) tumor budding (BD-1) in 81 (63%) surgical specimens. Positive tumor budding (BD-1) was associated with significantly reduced T‑level downstaging (P < 0.001) and tumor regression (P < 0.001). After a median follow-up time of 7 years (range 2.9–146.7 months), BD-0 patients had more favorable 5‑year RFS (90 vs. 71%, P = 0.02) and distant recurrence (2 vs. 12%, P = 0.03) estimates. Multivariable analyses confirmed BD-1 as a negative predictive parameter for RFS (hazard ratio = 3.44, 95% confidence interval 1.23–9.63, P = 0.018).

Conclusions

Our data confirm tumor budding as a strong prognostic factor and its potential predictive value for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer patients. This provides the opportunity to modify and individualize neoadjuvant therapy regimens for non-responders.

Model predicting the ypN0 status after good response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify the predictive factors for ypN0 status in tumors with good pathologic response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients at two tertiary cancer center who underwent rectal resection after good response to CRT between 2000 and 2013.

RESULTS

No preoperative treatment (oxaliplatin use, radiotherapy boost of 5,4 Gy, delay CRT-surgery) impacted on the ypN status. In the multivariate analysis, only a ypT<3 (HR 7.5 [2,9-19.5]) was significant and no lymphovascular invasion (HR 8,9 [1.6-49.8]) was limited to significance.The best model predicting the ypN0 status used only the ypT status<3. The major part (92.2%) of patients with ypT0-2 tumors had no LN invasion.

CONCLUSION

The risk of lymph node involvement metastases was only 7.8% for the patients with an ypT0-2 status. A fullthickness transanal resection coud be the futur treatment of these patients.

MR Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Radiomics Analysis to Assess Treatment Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy

Purpose To investigate the value of T2-weighted-based radiomics compared with qualitative assessment at T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging for diagnosis of clinical complete response in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy-radiation therapy (CRT). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 114 patients with rectal cancer who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after CRT between March 2012 and February 2016. Median age among women (47 of 114, 41%) was 55.9 years (interquartile range, 45.4-66.7 years) and median age among men (67 of 114, 59%) was 55 years (interquartile range, 48-67 years). Surgical histopathologic analysis was the reference standard for pathologic complete response (pCR). For qualitative assessment, two radiologists reached a consensus. For radiomics, one radiologist segmented the volume of interest on high-spatial-resolution T2-weighted images. A random forest classifier was trained to separate the patients by their outcomes after balancing the number of patients in each response category by using the synthetic minority oversampling technique. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, McNemar test, and Benjamini-Hochberg method. Results Twenty-one of 114 patients (18%) achieved pCR. The radiomic classifier demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87, 0.96), sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 0.84, 1), specificity of 91% (95% CI: 0.84, 0.96), positive predictive value of 72% (95% CI: 0.53, 0.87), and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 0.96, 1). The diagnostic performance of radiomics was significantly higher than was qualitative assessment at T2-weighted imaging or DW imaging alone (P < .02). The specificity and positive predictive values were significantly higher in radiomics than were at combined T2-weighted and DW imaging (P < .0001). Conclusion T2-weighted-based radiomics showed better classification performance compared with qualitative assessment at T2-weighted and DW imaging for diagnosing pCR in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after CRT. ^© RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Is the pathological regression level of metastatic lymph nodes associated with oncologic outcomes following preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer?

Purpose

The oncologic impact of the lymph node (LN) regression level after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) has not been thoroughly evaluated. Hence, this study aimed to examine whether the regression level of metastatic LNs following PCRT is associated with oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer.

Results

The optimal number of cut points for LRG sum was determined to be three. The three LRG groups demonstrated different distributions according to the ypT and ypN stages (p < 0.001 for both). However, the distribution of the LRG groups was not associated with the TRG of the primary tumor (p = 0.527). The RFS significantly differed according to the LRG groups (p = 0.001). Moreover, the differences in RFS remained when the LRG groups were analyzed within each separate ypN stage. The LRG group was confirmed as a factor associated with RFS in the multivariate analysis (p=0.018), while the ypN stage was not (p=0.4).

Patients and Methods

We analyzed the outcomes of 142 rectal cancer patients diagnosed with ypN1 disease after PCRT followed by radical resection. The pathological responses of the primary tumor and LNs to PCRT were evaluated using the tumor regression grade (TRG) and LN regression grade (LRG), respectively. The impact of LRG on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed. The K-adaptive partitioning for survival data method was applied to determine the optimal number of cut points for the LRG-sum and the optimal number of subgroups.

Conclusion

The LRG as an indicator of response to PCRT should be considered as a prognostic determinant in rectal cancer patients. Future large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Is the assessment of submucosal invasion still useful in the management of early rectal cancer? A study of 91 consecutive patients

AIM

The only studies on the prognosis of T1 tumours are old and investigate colic and rectal cancers. Very few studies use Kikuchi's classification (of dividing submucosa into three strata) to evaluate the depth of the submucosal invasion. This study aimed to assess the pathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM), and the pathological and oncological results of patients with early rectal cancer (ERC, pT1 tumour).

METHOD

Between 2000 and 2014, 91 consecutive patients undergoing surgery [primary total mesorectal excision (TME) or local excision (LE) alone, or LE followed by TME] for ERC were included.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients underwent LE, 22 underwent LE followed by TME and 51 underwent primary total TME. After TME (n = 73), 16 (23%) patients had LNM. The LNM rate was 15% for Sm1 tumours, 14% for Sm2 tumours and 30% for Sm3 tumours. In multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.027) and high tumour budding (P = 0.037) were the only independent factors predictive of LNM. The depth of submucosal invasion was not associated with an increased risk of LNM. After a mean follow up of 56 ± 46 months, 5-year overall survival, specific survival and disease-free survival were, respectively, 82%, 93% and 75%. No significant difference of survival was found according to the depth of submucosal invasion or to the surgical management.

CONCLUSION

Histological features seem to be stronger risk factors for LNM than depth of submucosal invasion. Considering the LNM rate, TME should be discussed after LE in terms of one of these pathological criteria.

High nodal positivity rates even in good clinical responders after chemoradiation of rectal cancer: is organ preservation feasible?

AIM

Local excision (LE) is emerging as a treatment option for rectal cancer responding well to chemoradiation. However, it does not address the mesorectal nodal burden. We aimed to identify the factors influencing nodal positivity and subsequently defined a low-risk group by including only patients at low risk.

METHOD

A single-centre, retrospective database analysis was carried out of patients with radically resected rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

RESULTS

This study included 524 patients with predominantly low rectal tumours. Nodal positivity among ypT0, T1 and T2 groups was 14.7%, 28% and 30%, respectively. Multivariate analysis with stepwise logistic regression identified the following low-risk features: age ≥ 40 years, nonsignet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) histology and pathological complete response (pCR). Sixty-nine patients fulfilling all three criteria were analysed and the nodal positivity was found to be 10.1%, which implies that, if these patients had been selected for LE, one in 10 would have had positive mesorectal nodes.

CONCLUSION

Even in patients with low-risk criteria (pCR, non-SRCC histology and age ≥ 40 years), the residual positive nodal disease burden is 10%. Whether this high incidence of residual nodal disease translates into a similar risk of locoregional recurrence if an organ-preservation strategy is adopted is unclear.

Long-Term Outcome of Rectal Cancer With Clinically (EUS/MRI) Metastatic Mesorectal Lymph Nodes Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Role of Organ Preservation Strategies in Relation to Pathologic Response

BACKGROUND

Organ preservation strategies are under investigation for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who achieve a complete pathologic response in the primary tumor (ypT0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT). This study explored the value of this approach for cN+ patients.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from our institutional prospective rectal cancer database. Tumors with mesorectal lymph nodes larger than 5 mm shown on endorectal ultrasonography, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, or both were staged as cN+.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 226 patients (142 men and 84 women; median age, 64 years) with LARC who underwent CRT followed by surgery including total mesorectal excision (TME) (n = 179) and full-thickness local excision (LE) (n = 47) between 1996 and 2013. At staging, 123 patients (54.4 %) were cN+. In 65 cases (28.7 %), ypCR was observed. Metastatic mesorectal lymph nodes (ypN+) were detected in 41.6 % of the cN+ patients and in 2.8 % of the cN0 patients (P < 0.01). Among the cN+ patients, 16 % of the ypT0 cases were ypN+ compared with 51.8 % of the no-ypT0 cases (P < 0.01). Among the cN+ patients who underwent TME, the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were respectively 100 and 91.6 % for the ypT0 patients compared with 71.2 and 58.0 % for the no-ypT0 patients (P = 0.01). Among the ypN+ patients, the 5-year DSS and DFS rates were both 100 % for the ypT0 cases compared with 59.1 and 43.3 % for the no-ypT0 patients. Among the cN+ and ypT0 patients, the 5-year DSS and DFS were respectively 100 and 85.7 % for the TME patients compared with 100 and 91.6 % for the LE patients. In the multivariate analysis, ypT0 was the only independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Protocols aimed at organ preservation in LARC that achieve ypT0 after CRT can be offered also to cN+ patients.

Oncologic Safety of Local Excision Compared With Total Mesorectal Excision for ypT0-T1 Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis

Good oncologic outcomes, demonstrated by a complete pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT), have led to local excision (LE) in selected patients with rectal cancer. We evaluated the oncologic safety of LE compared with total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with ypT0-T1 rectal cancer.A retrospective review of 304 patients who underwent PCRT, followed by LE or TME, for ypT0-T1 rectal cancer was performed. Propensity scores were computed and used to match groups (LE:TME = 1:1), and analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was made by comparing patients who underwent LE or TME. Prognostic factors of relapse were analyzed for all patients.Tumor categories were ypT0 in 25 (61.9%) cases, ypTis in 6 (14.3%) cases, and ypT1 in 11 (26.2%) cases for the LE group, and ypT0 in 28 (66.7%) cases, ypTis in 4 (9.5%) cases, and ypT1 in 10 (23.8%) cases for the matched TME patients. There was no significant difference between the matched LE and TME groups in relapse (4.8% and 7.14%, respectively; P = 0.646), 5-year DFS (95.2% vs 91.6%; P = 0.33) and 5-year OS (96.6% vs 88.0%; P = 0.238). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, tumor distance from the anal verge (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.616-0.992) and the tumor grade (HR = 4.29; 95% CI = 1.430-12.886) were significantly associated with the recurrence risk.LE results in oncologic outcomes that are comparable to those achieved by TME in selected patients with ypT0-T1 rectal cancer after PCRT.

Can tumor regression grade influence survival outcome in ypT3 rectal cancer?

PURPOSE

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients achieving ypT3 status following neoadjuvant chemoradiation are considered to have poor response with minimal downstaging. However, residual cancer cell amounts vary in the subserosa/perirectal fat. Tumor regression grading (TRG) is an evaluation method based on the proportion of fibrosis and residual cancer cells. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of TRG in ypT3 rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 325 LARC patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery. TRG scores were recorded by two independent pathologists. Among these patients, 143 were staged as ypT3. We analyzed TRG and other clinicopathological factors and their relationship with survival outcome including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Among 143 ypT3 patients, 44 (30.8 %) were TRG1, 84 (58.7 %) were TRG2 and 15 (10.5 %) were TRG3. Seventy-nine (55.3 %) of these patients had metastatic lymph nodes. In univariate analysis, TRG was not associated with DFS (TRG2 vs TRG1, P = 0.852; TRG3 vs TRG1, P = 0.593) or OS (TRG2 vs TRG1, P = 0.977; TRG3 vs TRG1, P = 0.665). Palliative surgery (HR 3.845; 95 % CI 1.670-8.857; P = 0.002) and metastatic lymph nodes after surgery (HR 5.894; 95 % CI 1.142-3.48; P = 0.015) were significantly associated with decreased DFS, while palliative surgery was the only factor associated with worse OS (HR 6.011; 95 % CI 2.150-16.810; P = 0.001). Palliative surgery (HR 3.923; 95 % CI 1.696-9.073; P = 0.001) and metastatic lymph nodes (HR 2.011; 95 % CI 1.152-3.512; P = 0.014) also showed prognostic significance for DFS in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual cancer cells evaluated by TRG score after neoadjuvant chemoradiation do not influence survival outcome in ypT3 rectal cancer patients. However, lymph node status is a significant prognostic factor in ypT3 patients.

Management of oligometastatic rectal cancer: is liver first?

Twenty percent of patients with rectal cancer present with synchronous liver metastases at the time of initial diagnosis. These patients can be treated with a curative intent, although the choice and sequence of treatment modalities are not well established and are commonly debated in multi-disciplinary tumor boards. In this article we review clinical evidence for various treatment approaches and attempt to formulate a pathway for clinicians to use in evaluating and managing these patients.

Pathological prognostic factors in locally advanced rectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: analysis of 113 cases

AIMS

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) followed by surgical resection is the treatment for locally advanced mid-rectal or low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative histological prognostic factors in a series of surgical specimens after neoadjuvant RCT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen patients were included. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations were performed according to CAP recommendations, with additional criteria such as tumour budding, the presence of calcifications, and response to neoadjuvant therapy assessed according to Modified Rectal Cancer Regression Grade (m-RCRG). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 67.6%. In univariate analysis, ypTN stage, tumour budding, circumferential margin, invaded margin and vascular and perineural invasion were prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, the presence of calcifications (P = 0.04) and an involved circumferential margin (P = 0.03) were the only independent factors for worse DFS. mRCRG was not correlated with DFS. Among the 50 m-RCRG1 tumours, DFS was better in ypT0 patients than in other ypT stages (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of calcifications in the tumour bed is described for the first time as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer. The prognostic value of budding was demonstrated in this study after neoadjuvant RCT. ypT stage appears to be a more reliable predictor of oncological outcome than histological tumour regression grade, which needs to be standardized for better reproducibility.

A multicentric randomized controlled trial on the impact of lengthening the interval between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery on complete pathological response in rectal cancer (GRECCAR-6 trial): rationale and design

Background

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) is now part of the armamentarium of cancer of the lower and middle rectum. It is recommended in current clinical practice prior to surgical excision if the lesion is classified T3/T4 or N+. Histological complete response, defined by the absence of persistent tumor cell invasion and lymph node (ypT0N0) after pathological examination of surgical specimen has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor of overall survival and disease-free survival. Surgical excision is usually performed between 6 and 8 weeks after completion of CRT and pathological complete response rate ranges around 12%. In retrospective studies, a lengthening of the interval after RCT beyond 10 weeks was found as an independent factor increasing the rate of pathological complete response (between 26% and 31%), with a longer disease-free survival and without increasing the operative morbidity. The aim of the present study is to evaluate in 264 patients the rate of pathological complete response rate of rectal cancer after RCT by lengthening the time between RCT and surgery.

Methods/design

The current study is a multicenter randomized trial in two parallel groups comparing 7 and 11 weeks of delay between the end of RCT and cancer surgery of rectal tumors.

At the end of the RCT, surgery is planified and randomization is performed after patient’s written consent for participation. The histological complete response (ypT0N0) will be determined with analysis of the complete residual tumor and double reading by two pathologists blinded of the group of inclusion. Patients will be followed in clinics for 5 years after surgery. Participation in this trial does not change patient’s management in terms of treatment, investigations or visits. Secondary endpoints will include overall and disease free survival, rate of sphincter conservation and quality of mesorectal excision. The number of patients needed is 264.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01648894

Local resection for small rectal cancer

Rectal resection with total mesorectal excision is the standard treatment for rectal cancers. Local excision represents an alternative with less post-operative mortality and morbidity and preservation of intestinal and bladder function. However, local excision cannot provide adequate nodal staging. Presently, endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are used to select the appropriate patients for local excision, those with limited T1 rectal tumors. There is general agreement that the ideal tumors for local excision are less or equal to 3 cm in diameter, superficial (usTis and/or usT1N0), infra-peritoneal, located below the middle rectal valve, and involving no more than 40% of the rectal circumference. Transanal tumor excision is suitable for distal tumors and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for mid and upper lesions. The principles of adequate resection margin, non-fragmentation, and full-thickness excision are similar to those for any cancer resection. Unfavorable pathologic criteria, as assessed on the fixed rectal specimen, include depth of tumor invasion (submucosal [T1sm3] or muscular [T2]), positive resection margins, vascular and/or lymphatic invasion, and poor differentiation. Further radical surgery is required in case of unfavorable criteria. Simple surveillance may be advised for superficial tumors (T1sm1) without any unfavorable criteria. Management of T1sm2 tumors without any unfavorable criteria should be discussed on a case-by-case basis.