Infection with hepatitis C virus is an adverse prognostic factor after liver resection for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma eligible for liver transplantation

Comparison of Postoperative Prognosis Among HBV-Related, HCV-Related, and Non-HBV Non-HCV Hepatocellular Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Context: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer, and different hepatitis viruses might affect the prognosis of patients with HCC. Objectives: This study aimed to reveal the differences in the postoperative prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus-related HCC (HBV-HCC), hepatitis C virus-related HCC (HCV-HCC), and non-HBV non-HCV hepatocellular carcinoma (NBNC-HCC). Methods: The databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for articles published until April 2022. Stata software version 12 and Review Manager version 5.4 were used to conduct the meta-analysis, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was adopted in this study. Results: In the present study, 26 papers on a total of 20381 participants who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The 5-year overall survival in the HBV-HCC and HCV-HCC groups was lower than in the NBNC-HCC group (HBV-HCC vs. NBNC-HCC, P = 0.005; HCV-HCC vs. NBNC-HCC, P = 0.001). Patients with HBV-HCC and HCV-HCC had worse 5-year recurrence-free survival than patients with NBNC-HCC (HBV-HCC vs. NBNC-HCC, P = 0; HCV-HCC vs. NBNC-HCC, P = 0). In addition, the 5-year recurrence-free rate in the HCV-HCC group was lower than in the HBV-HCC group (P = 0). The observed association between serum alpha-fetoprotein levels and the postoperative prognosis was inconsistent in different subgroups. Conclusions: Patients with NBNC-HCC had a significantly better postoperative prognosis than those with virus-related HCC. The alpha-fetoprotein levels significantly correlated with the postoperative prognosis of patients with HCC.

An MMP-based risk score strongly distinguishes prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after resection

Aim: To first explore the prognostic value of MMP11 and MMP15 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: MMP11/MMP15 expression was immunohistochemically detected and correlated with clinicopathologic variables and survival and confirmed in publicly available databases. An MMP-based risk score (MMPRS) was established. Results: Tumoral MMP11/MMP15 expression was higher and univariately associated with crucial clinicopathologic parameters, overall survival and disease-free survival in all patients and/or many subsets. Multivariately, MMP11/MMP15 expression remained significant. Their overexpression and prognostic value were confirmed in the Ualcan and Kaplan-Meier plotter databases. Critically, the novel MMPRS integrating MMP11, MMP15 and tumor-node-metastasis stage identified subgroups with the best and worst prognoses, with much higher predictive power. Conclusion: MMP11 and MMP15 served as prognosticators in hepatocellular carcinoma. MMPRS might work more accurately.

Liver transplantation vs liver resection in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criterion: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of published reports to compare long-term outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) and liver resection (LR), respectively, in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Milan criterion.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Embase, Medline, PubMed databases, and the Cochrane Library was performed using both medical subject headings (MeSH) and truncated word searches to identify all comparative studies published on this topic. The primary outcomes were postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We calculated the pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of OS and DFS.

RESULTS

Pooled analysis of six studies, with a total of 1697 patients with HCC beyond Milan criteria, did not reveal a statistically significant improvement in OS in patients undergoing LT vs LR (LT vs LR, HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.68-1.01, P = .06), without significant heterogeneity (χ²  = 8.38, I² = 40.3%, P = .137). Five studies with a total of 1511 patients were included in pooled analysis of DFS between LT and LR group. In the fixed-effects model, patients in the LT group gained significantly better DFS (LT vs LR, HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37-0.56, P < .001) than patients in the LR group, with no significant heterogeneity (χ²  = 6.80, I² = 41.6%, P = .144). Four studies provided the data of adjusted HRs (LT vs LR). In the fixed-effects model, patients in the LT group had significantly better OS (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.44-0.77, P < .001, I² = 0%) and DFS (HR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.08-0.23, P < .001, I² = 0%) than those of patients in the LR group. The sensitivity analyses revealed that the results were robust.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that HBV-related patients with HCC beyond Milan criterion who underwent LT gained better OS and DFS compared with patients who underwent LR after adjusting confounding factors.

INFLUENCE OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA ETIOLOGY IN THE SURVIVAL AFTER RESECTION

Background:

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent type of primary liver cancer and its incidence is increasing around the world in the last decades, making it the third cause of death by cancer in the world. Hepatic resection is one of the most effective treatments for HCC with five-year survival rates from 50-70%, especially for patients with a single nodule and preserved liver function. Some studies have shown a worse prognosis for HCC patients whose etiology is viral. That brings us to the question about the existence of a difference between the various causes of HCC and its prognosis.

Aim:

To compare the prognosis (overall and disease-free survival at five years) of patients undergoing hepatectomy for the treatment of HCC with respect to various causes of liver disease.

Method:

Was performed a review of medical records of patients undergoing hepatectomy between 2000 and 2014 for the treatment of HCC. They were divided into groups according to the cause of liver disease, followed by overall and disease-free survival analysis for comparison.

Results:

There was no statistically significant difference in the outcomes of the groups of patients divided according to the etiology of HCC. Overall and disease-free survival at five years of the patients in this sample were 49.9% and 40.7%, respectively.

Conclusion:

From the data of this sample, was verified that there was no prognostic differences among the groups of HCC patients of the various etiologies.

Liver resection for early hepatocellular cancer: Comparison of centers in 3 different countries

AIM

To compare patients who underwent resection of early stage hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in three different countries.

METHODS

This retrospective study characterizes 573 stage I/II HCC patients treated with liver resection in 3 tertiary-referral centers: Tokyo (n = 250), Honolulu (n = 146) and Shanghai (n = 177).

RESULTS

Shanghai patients were younger, predominantly male, hepatitis-B seropositive (94%) and cirrhotic (93%). Tokyo patients were older and more likely to have hepatitis-C (67%), smaller tumors, low albumin, and normal alpha-fetoprotein. The Honolulu cohort had the largest tumors and 30% had no viral hepatitis. Age-adjusted mortality at 1 and 5-years were lower in the Tokyo cohort compared to Honolulu and there was no difference in mortality between Shanghai and Honolulu cohorts. Elevated alpha-fetoprotein, low albumin and tumor > 5 cm were associated with increased 1-year mortality. These factors and cirrhosis were independently associated with increased 5-year mortality. Independent risk factors of survival varied when examined separately by center.

CONCLUSION

The profile of early-stage HCC patients is strikingly different across countries and likely contributes to survival differences. Underlying differences in patient populations including risk factors/comorbidities influencing disease progression may also account for variation in outcomes.

The long-term outcomes after curative resection for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma associated with hepatitis C viral infection: a multicenter analysis by Osaka Hepatic Surgery Study Group

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection plays an important role in the development of not only hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but also intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The aim of this study was to identify the specific characteristics of HCV-related ICC.

METHODS

Of 90 patients who underwent curative resection for mass-forming ICC, 33 patients had chronic HCV infection. We examined the relationship between HCV infection and the clinicopathologic findings and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

The incidence of simultaneous HCC was significantly higher in patients infected with HCV (30.3%) than in those without HCV infection (5.3%). Four patients were diagnosed with metachronous HCC after resection for HCV-related ICC. Patients with HCV infection had a significantly shorter overall survival time than patients without HCV infection, although there was no difference in ICC tumor-free survival rates between the two groups. Five HCC-related deaths occurred in patients with HCV infection, while none of patients without HCV infection died from HCC. Multivariate analysis indicated that HCV infection, tumor size >5 cm, multiple ICC tumors, and nodal metastases were predictors of poor prognosis in patients who underwent curative resection for mass-forming ICC.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV infection was an adverse prognostic factor after curative resection for mass-forming ICC.

Transplant versus resection for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma meeting Milan Criteria in the MELD exception era at a single institution in a UNOS region with short wait times

BACKGROUND

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception era remains regionally variable. Outcomes were compared for patients undergoing transplant versus resection at a single institution in a UNOS region with short wait times for organ availability.

METHODS

All patients who underwent resection of HCC from January 2000 to August 2012 and patients who underwent transplant post-January 2006, during the Milan Criteria (MC)-based MELD exception policy for HCC, were identified. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-seven patients were analyzed, of whom 131 underwent transplant and 126 underwent resection. All transplant patients met MC; 45 (36%) resection patients met MC. Median follow-up time was 30 months. Median wait time to transplant was 55 days; no patients dropped off the waitlist while awaiting an organ. Among patients meeting MC, transplant demonstrated significantly greater 5-year OS (65.7% vs. 43.8%; P = 0.005) and RFS (85.3% vs. 22.7%; P < 0.001) versus resection. For patients with hepatitis C, transplant (n = 87) demonstrated significantly improved 5-year outcomes compared to patients meeting MC who underwent resection (n = 21; OS: 63.5% vs. 23.3%; P = 0.001; RFS: 83.5% vs. 23.7%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a region with short waitlist times for organ availability, liver transplant is associated with improved survival compared to resection for HCC within MC and should be considered for all patients meeting MC, particularly those with hepatitis C.