1
|
Cos H, Shen P. Comparison of outcomes between surgical treatment of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver and the peritoneum: Review of the literature. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:85-90. [PMID: 37990864 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver and peritoneum are two of the most common sites of colorectal metastases. METHODS We searched for articles comparing outcomes of surgical management for metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver and peritoneum. CONCLUSION Cytoreductive surgery/heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy has a similar safety profile and survival outcomes as hepatectomy for colorectal metastases after stratifying by resection status and should be incorporated earlier in the management algorithm for colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases METHODS: We performed a wide search on PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for articles comparing outcomes of surgical management for metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver and peritoneum. We focused on studies comparing their perioperative clinical outcomes as well as their oncological outcomes. The following words were included in the search: comparison, outcomes, metastasectomy, colorectal cancer, liver, peritoneal surface disease, hepatectomy, and cytoreduction. RESULTS One hundred and twenty studies were evaluated. Six of these studies met the criteria for this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidy Cos
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Section Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Perry Shen
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Section Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morales-Soriano R, Pineño-Flores C, Morón-Canis JM, Molina-Romero FJ, Rodriguez-Pino JC, Loyola-Miró J, Gonzalez-Argente FX, Palma-Zamora E, Guillot-Morales M, Giménez S, Alvarez-Mon M, Ortega MA, Segura-Sampedro JJ. Simultaneous Surgical Approach with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Patients with Concurrent Peritoneal and Liver Metastases of Colon Cancer Origin. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12113860. [PMID: 37298054 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Simultaneous liver resection and peritoneal cytoreduction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains controversial today. The aim of the study was to analyze the postoperative outcomes and survival of patients with advanced metastatic colon cancer (peritoneal and/or liver metastases). Methods: Retrospective observational study from a prospective maintained data base. Patients who underwent a simultaneous peritoneal cytoreduction and liver resection plus HIPEC were studied. Postoperative outcomes and overall and disease free survival were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: From January 2010 to October 2022, 22 patients operated with peritoneal and liver metastasis (LR+) were compared with 87 patients operated with peritoneal metastasis alone (LR-). LR+ group presented higher serious morbidity (36.4 vs. 14.9%; p: 0.034). Postoperative mortality did not reach statistical difference. Median overall and disease free survival was similar. Peritoneal carcinomatosis index was the only predictive factor of survival. Conclusions: Simultaneous peritoneal and liver resection is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and hospital stay, but with similar postoperative mortality and OS and disease free survival. These results reflect the evolution of these patients, considered inoperable until recently, and justify the trend to incorporate this surgical strategy within a multimodal therapeutic plan in highly selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Morales-Soriano
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IDISBA), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Royal Academy of Medicine of the Balearic Islands, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Cristina Pineño-Flores
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - José Miguel Morón-Canis
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Molina-Romero
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Julia Loyola-Miró
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Francisco Xavier Gonzalez-Argente
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IDISBA), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Elías Palma-Zamora
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Mónica Guillot-Morales
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Sandra Giménez
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Melchor Alvarez-Mon
- Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (IRYCIS), University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | - Miguel A Ortega
- Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (IRYCIS), University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | - Juan José Segura-Sampedro
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IDISBA), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Solsky I, Moaven O, Valenzuela CD, Lundy M, Stauffer JA, Del Piccolo NR, Cheung T, Corvera CU, Wisneski AD, Cha C, Zarandi NP, Dourado J, Russell G, Levine EA, Votanopoulos KI, Shen P. Survival Outcomes of Optimally Treated Colorectal Metastases: The Importance of R0 Status in Surgical Treatment of Hepatic and Peritoneal Surface Disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2023:10.1245/s10434-023-13174-3. [PMID: 36754944 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13174-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although colorectal hepatic metastases (HM) and peritoneal surface disease (PSD) are distinct biologic diseases, they may have similar long-term survival when optimally treated with surgery. METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed prospectively managed databases. Patients undergoing R0 or R1 resections were analyzed with descriptive statistics, the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression. Survival was compared over time for the following periods: 1993-2006, 2007-2012, and 2013-2020. RESULTS The study enrolled 783 HM patients undergoing liver resection and 204 PSD patients undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Compared with PSD patients, HM patients more often had R0 resections (90.3% vs. 32.4%), less often had pre-procedure chemotherapy (52.4% vs. 92.1%), and less often were functionally independent (79.7% vs. 95.6%). The 5-year overall survival for HM was 40.9%, with a median survival period of 45.8 months versus 25.8% and 33.4 months, respectively, for PSD (p < 0.05). When stratified by resection status, R0 HM and R0 PSD did not differ significantly in median survival (49.0 vs. 45.4 months; p = 0.83). The median survival after R1 resection also was similar between HM and PSD (32.6 vs. 26.9 months; p = 0.59). Survival between the two groups again was similar over time when stratified by resection status. The predictors of survival for HM patients were R0 resection, number of lesions, intraoperative transfusion, age, and adjuvant chemotherapy. For the PSD patients, the predictors were peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, estimated blood loss (EBL), and female gender. CONCLUSION The study showed that R0 resections are associated with improved outcomes and that median survival is similar between HM and PSD patients when it is achieved. Surveillance and treatment strategies that facilitate R0 resections are needed to improve results, particularly for PSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Solsky
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Cristian D Valenzuela
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Megan Lundy
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Tanto Cheung
- University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | | | | | | | - Nima Pourhabibi Zarandi
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Justin Dourado
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Gregory Russell
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Edward A Levine
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Perry Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio based perioperative prediction of prognosis model on early mortality after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Asian J Surg 2022; 45:2676-2685. [PMID: 35260332 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.01.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combined cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) to treat peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) has gained a positive result compared with palliative chemotherapy alone in several cancer types. However, its postoperative care could be challenging. We aimed to develop a predicting model on early mortality. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 132 PSM patients who had received CRS-HIPEC. The optimal cut-off value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was determined as 4.4 by using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75. The impact of NLR on survival was elucidated by comparing the pre-operative low (NLR≤ 4.4, n = 101) and high (NLR> 4.4, n = 31) groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. The significant variables selected in multivariate analysis on early mortality were used in prediction model development. RESULTS Multivariate analysis showed that incomplete CRS, major postoperative complications, higher pre-operative NLR, and dynamic NLR changes were significant predictors of early mortality. Our perioperative prediction of prognosis (triple P) model contained four independent risks, and the AUC after classification was 0.860 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.773-0.947). External validation confirmed positive discrimination ability (AUC: 0.808, 95% CI: 0.666-0.950). CONCLUSION In conclusion, our triple P model provides great determination in outcomes prediction and it is easily obtained, reliable, and applicable in routine practice.
Collapse
|
5
|
García-Fadrique A, Estevan Estevan R, Sabater Ortí L. Quality Standards for Surgery of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:188-202. [PMID: 34435297 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10642-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standardization of surgical outcomes throughout surgical procedures is mandatory. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) should provide proficient oncological and surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN The aim of this study was to identify clinically relevant quality indicators and their quality standard, and to determine their acceptable quality limit. A systematic review on cytoreductive results from 2000 to 2018 was performed focusing on clinical guidelines, consensus conferences, and publications. After the selection of quality indicators, a systematic review of indexed references was performed in order to calculate the quality standard for each indicator. STUDY SELECTION Unicentric/multicentric series, comparative studies, and clinical trials. Studies were to include outcomes after cytoreduction of colorectal origin and series with more than 50 patients. Quality indicators with at least 10 series were mandatory and objective measurements were also mandatory for inclusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Quality indicators selected were 1- to 5-year survival, overall disease-free survival, 1- to 5-year disease-free survival, complete surgical resection, duration of surgery, length of stay, overall morbimortality, major morbidity, re-intervention, postoperative hemorrhage, intestinal fistula, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, postoperative medical complications, overall recurrence, and failure to rescue. RESULTS The most relevant quality indicators and critical quality limits were overall disease-free survival and 5-year overall disease-free survival (14 months and <10 months, and 14% and <4%, respectively), completeness of surgical resection (89% and <80%, respectively), overall mortality (3% and >8%, respectively), overall morbidity (47% and >63%, respectively), failure to rescue (12% and <30%, respectively), reintervention (13 and <22%, respectively), anastomotic leakage (6% and <13%, respectively), and overall recurrence (60% and <74%, respectively). CONCLUSION This is the first study to assess quality standards in CRS + HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases. The current data are of particular relevance for future studies to control the variability of this surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luis Sabater Ortí
- Hospital Clínico Universitario, Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ding Y, Rao SX, Wang WT, Chen CZ, Li RC, Zeng M. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR findings in chemotherapy-induced sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in colorectal liver metastases. J Int Med Res 2021; 48:300060520926031. [PMID: 32500783 PMCID: PMC7278311 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520926031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We assessed the clinical presentations, biomarkers, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI features that were associated with oxaliplatin-induced sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) to detect chemotherapy-associated SOS in a timely manner. Methods Fifty-seven patients who underwent oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were included. Post-oxaliplatin heterogeneity in liver parenchyma was scored on a grading scale of 0 to 3. Abnormal clinical findings, including splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, gall bladder wall thickening, and hepatic vein narrowing, were also assessed. Additionally, alanine transaminase (ALT) levels, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, and platelet counts were measured. Results For SOS, 21 patients were scored grade 0, 24 were grade 1, seven were grade 2, and five were grade 3. Hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, gall bladder wall thickening, and hepatic vein narrowing were significantly correlated with the grade for non-tumorous hepatic parenchymal heterogeneity. For laboratory findings, ALT and AST levels, the AST-to-platelet ratio index score, and platelet counts were significantly associated with a high grade (≥2) of non-tumorous hepatic parenchymal heterogeneity. Conclusions We assessed the clinical presentations, biomarkers, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI features that were associated with oxaliplatin-induced sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) to detect chemotherapy-associated SOS in a timely manner. Additionally, specific laboratory findings were significantly associated with a high grade (≥2).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Ding
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sheng-Xiang Rao
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Tao Wang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Cai-Zhong Chen
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ren-Chen Li
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lieto E, Auricchio A, Cardella F, Mabilia A, Basile N, Castellano P, Orditura M, Galizia G. Fluorescence-Guided Surgery in the Combined Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Colorectal Cancer: Preliminary Results and Considerations. World J Surg 2018; 42:1154-1160. [PMID: 28929277 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4237-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indocyanine green (ICG) is a near-infrared fluorescent contrast agent, which preferentially accumulates in cancer tissue. The aim of our study was to investigate the role of fluorescence imaging (FI) with ICG (ICG-FI) for detecting peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS Four CRC patients with PC scheduled for cytoreductive surgery + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were enrolled in this prospective study. At a median time of 50 min after 0.25 mg/kg ICG injected intravenously, intraoperative ICG-FI using Fluobeam® was performed in vivo and ex vivo on all specimens. The Peritoneal Cancer Index was used to estimate the likelihood of complete cytoreduction. RESULTS No severe complications were recorded. ICG-FI took a median of 20 min (range 10-30, IQR 15-25). Sixty-nine nodules were harvested. Fifty-two nodules had been diagnosed preoperatively by conventional imaging (n = 30; 43%) or intraoperatively by visual inspection/palpation (n = 22; 32%). With ICG-FI, 47 (90%) nodules were hyperfluorescent, and five hypofluorescent. Intraoperative ICG-FI identified 17 additional hyperfluorescent nodules. On histopathology, 16 were metastatic nodules. Sensitivity increased from 76.9%, with the conventional diagnostic procedures, to 96.9% with ICG-FI. The positive predictive value of ICG-FI was 98.4%, and test accuracy was 95.6%. Diagnostic performance of ICG-FI was significantly better than preoperative (p = 0.027) and intraoperative conventional procedures (p = 0.042). The median PCI score increased from 7 to 10 after ICG-FI (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that intraoperative ICG-FI can improve outcomes in patients undergoing CS for PC from CRC. Further studies are needed to determine the role of ICG-FI in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Lieto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli' - School of Medicine, c/o II Policlinico, Edificio 17, Via Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Annamaria Auricchio
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli' - School of Medicine, c/o II Policlinico, Edificio 17, Via Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Cardella
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli' - School of Medicine, c/o II Policlinico, Edificio 17, Via Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Mabilia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli' - School of Medicine, c/o II Policlinico, Edificio 17, Via Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Basile
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli' - School of Medicine, c/o II Policlinico, Edificio 17, Via Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellano
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli' - School of Medicine, c/o II Policlinico, Edificio 17, Via Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Orditura
- Division of Medical Oncology - "F. Magrassi" Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli' - School of Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - Gennaro Galizia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli' - School of Medicine, c/o II Policlinico, Edificio 17, Via Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Impact of Synchronous Liver Resection on the Perioperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing CRS-HIPEC. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22:1576-1584. [PMID: 29713875 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3784-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While liver resection (LR) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are commonly performed for hepatic and peritoneal metastases, respectively, the safety of synchronous LR and CRS-HIPEC has not been established. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) databases from 2005 to 2016 were used to identify patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative outcomes were compared among patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC with and without synchronous LR. RESULTS Among 1168 patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC, 100 (8.6%) underwent synchronous LR and 1068 (91.4%) did not. The most common primary diagnosis was unspecified (65.3%) followed by appendix (16.0%) and colorectal (12.5%). Among patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC plus LR, the majority had a partial hepatectomy (96.0%), while a small subset underwent trisegmentectomy (2.0%) or hemihepatectomy (2.0%). Patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC plus LR underwent a greater number of operative procedures (8.3 ± 2.5 vs 6.7 ± 2.5, p < 0.001), had a longer operative time (520.7 ± 155.3 vs 454.6 ± 160.7 min, p = 0.001), had a longer hospital length of stay (16.7 ± 15.6 vs 11.1 ± 11.5 days, p < 0.001), were more likely to require reoperation (13.0 vs 6.9%, p = 0.03), and experienced greater 30-day morbidity (47.0 vs 27.4%, p < 0.001), but not mortality (3.0 vs 1.4%, p = 0.22). On multivariate logistic regression, LR was strongly associated with increased risk of postoperative morbidity even after controlling for potential confounders (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.03-2.64). CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous LR and CRS-HIPEC was associated with increased operative time, length of hospital stay, reoperation, and postoperative morbidity compared to CRS-HIPEC alone. For patients with synchronous hepatic and peritoneal metastases, a staged operative approach should be considered.
Collapse
|
9
|
McGee S, AlGhareeb W, Ahmad C, Armstrong D, Babak S, Berry S, Biagi J, Booth C, Bossé D, Champion P, Colwell B, Finn N, Goel R, Gray S, Green J, Harb M, Hyde A, Jeyakumar A, Jonker D, Kanagaratnam S, Kavan P, MacMillan A, Muinuddin A, Patil N, Porter G, Powell E, Ramjeesingh R, Raza M, Rorke S, Seal M, Servidio-Italiano F, Siddiqui J, Simms J, Smithson L, Snow S, St-Hilaire E, Stuckless T, Tate A, Tehfe M, Thirlwell M, Tsvetkova E, Valdes M, Vickers M, Virik K, Welch S, Marginean C, Asmis T. Eastern Canadian Colorectal Cancer Consensus Conference 2017. Curr Oncol 2018; 25:262-274. [PMID: 30111967 PMCID: PMC6092057 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.4083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The annual Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2017 was held in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, 28-30 September. Experts in radiation oncology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, and cancer genetics who are involved in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies participated in presentations and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses multiple topics in the management of gastric, rectal, and colon cancer, including ■ identification and management of hereditary gastric and colorectal cancer (crc);■ palliative systemic therapy for metastatic gastric cancer;■ optimum duration of preoperative radiation in rectal cancer-that is, short- compared with long-course radiation;■ management options for peritoneal carcinomatosis in crc;■ implications of tumour location for treatment and prognosis in crc; and■ new molecular markers in crc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S.F. McGee
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - W. AlGhareeb
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - C.H. Ahmad
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - D. Armstrong
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - S. Babak
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Berry
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - J. Biagi
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - C. Booth
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - D. Bossé
- Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, U.S.A
| | - P. Champion
- Prince Edward Island—Prince Edward Island Cancer Treatment Centre, Charlottetown
| | - B. Colwell
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - N. Finn
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - R. Goel
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Gray
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - J. Green
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - M. Harb
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - A. Hyde
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - A. Jeyakumar
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - D. Jonker
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Kanagaratnam
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - P. Kavan
- Quebec—McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (Kavan, Thirlwell); Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal (Tehfé)
| | - A. MacMillan
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - A. Muinuddin
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - N. Patil
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - G. Porter
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - E. Powell
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - R. Ramjeesingh
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - M. Raza
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - S. Rorke
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - M. Seal
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - F. Servidio-Italiano
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - J. Siddiqui
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - J. Simms
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - L. Smithson
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - S. Snow
- Nova Scotia—qeii Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax
| | - E. St-Hilaire
- New Brunswick—Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John (Gray); Centre hospitalier universitaire Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, Moncton (Finn, St-Hilaire); Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital, Fredericton (Raza); Moncton City Hospital (Harb)
| | - T. Stuckless
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - A. Tate
- Newfoundland and Labrador— Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s (Ahmad, Armstrong, Powell, Rorke, Seal, Siddiqui, Stuckless); Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Green, Seal, Siddiqui, Tate); Faculty of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s (Kanagaratnam); Eastern Health Authority, St. John’s (MacMillan); Labrador–Grenfell Regional Health Authority, Happy Valley–Goose Bay (Simms, Smithson)
| | - M. Tehfe
- Quebec—McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (Kavan, Thirlwell); Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal (Tehfé)
| | - M. Thirlwell
- Quebec—McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (Kavan, Thirlwell); Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal (Tehfé)
| | - E. Tsvetkova
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - M. Valdes
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - M. Vickers
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - K. Virik
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - S. Welch
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - C. Marginean
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| | - T. Asmis
- Ontario—The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa (AlGhareeb, Asmis, Goel, Hyde, Jonker, Marginean, McGee, Vickers); Queen’s University and Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Biagi, Booth, Virik); Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (Dawson); St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto (Babak); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (Berry); Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston (Mahmud); Queensway Health Centre, Toronto (Muinuddin); Colorectal Cancer Canada, North York (Servidio-Italiano); Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener (Tsvetkova, Valdes); London Health Sciences Centre, London (Welch)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang H, Dai W, Fu C, Yan X, Stemmer A, Tong T, Cai G. Diagnostic value of whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for detection of peritoneal metastases in colorectal malignancy. Cancer Biol Med 2018; 15:165-170. [PMID: 29951340 PMCID: PMC5994551 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2017.0162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI using diffusion-weighted sequence (WB-DWI) to determine the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in correlation with surgical and histopathological findings. Methods: Twenty-seven patients underwent preoperative WB-MRI, followed by cytoreductive surgery for primary tumors of the appendix (n = 15), colorectum (n = 12), and associated peritoneal disease. A total of 351 regions were retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated at 13 anatomical sites. The WB-DWI PCI and PCI type were compared with surgical and histopathological findings.
Results: No statistical difference was found between the WB-DWI PCI and surgical PCI (P = 0.574). WB-DWI correctly predicted the PCI type in 24 of 27 patients with high accuracy (88.9%), including 10 of 10 patients with small-volume tumor, 12 of 14 with moderate-volume tumor, and 2 of 3 with large-volume tumor. WB-DWI correctly depicted tumors in 163 of 203 regions, with 40 false-negative and 23 false-positive regions. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of WB-DWI for the detection of peritoneal tumors were 80.3%, 84.5%, and 82.1%, respectively. For lesions < 0.5 cm in diameter, WB-DWI demonstrated good sensitivity (69.4%).
Conclusions: WB-DWI accurately predicted PCI before surgery in patients undergoing evaluation for cytoreductive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Weixing Dai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Caixia Fu
- Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Xu Yan
- MR Collaboration NE Asia, Siemens Healthcare, Shanghai 210318, China
| | - Alto Stemmer
- MR Applications Development, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen 91052, Germany
| | | | - Guoxiang Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li XF, Tan YN, Zhong CH, Zhu LZ, Fang XF, Li J, Ding KF, Yuan Y. Left-sided primary tumor is a favorable prognostic factor for metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving surgery. Oncotarget 2017; 8:79618-79628. [PMID: 29108341 PMCID: PMC5668074 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2016] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of surgery in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains controversial. This study was performed to assess the impact of surgery on survival in metastatic colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Information of mCRC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013, was retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. Patients were classified in three groups: patients undergoing resection of both primary and distant metastatic tumors (group 'PMTR'), patients receiving primary tumor resection alone (group 'PTR') and patients not undergoing any surgery (group 'No resection'). Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were applied to estimate disease specific survival time (DSS) and determine prognostic factors. RESULTS A total of 38,591 mCRC patients were eligible. Overall, median DSS of group 'PMTR' was significantly longer compared with group 'PTR' and group 'No resection' (28.0 vs 21.0 vs 11.0 months, P < 0.001). Stratified analysis observed that primary tumor in left-sided colorectal cancer (LCRC) was a favorable prognostic factor compared with right-sided colorectal cancer (RCRC) (median DSS of LCRC: PMTR, 34 months, PTR, 25 months, No resection, 13 months; median DSS of RCRC: PMTR, 20 months, PTR, 16 months, No resection, 8 months; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that surgery was an independent prognostic factor for better survival (PMTR, HR = 0.403, 95% CI 0.384-0.423, P < 0.001; PTR, HR = 0.515, 95% CI 0.496-0.534, P < 0.001). Furthermore, in patients undergoing surgery, patients with younger age, female, married status, LCRC and lower CEA level were prone to receiving PMTR. CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrated that surgery was an independent prognostic factor for improved survival in mCRC. Patients with LCRC had better survival than patients with RCRC after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Fen Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Nuo Tan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chen-Han Zhong
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Li-Zhen Zhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xue-Feng Fang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ke-Feng Ding
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention of Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention of Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fluorescence Imaging After Indocyanine Green Injection for Detection of Peritoneal Metastases in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Colorectal Cancer: A Pilot Study. Ann Surg 2017; 264:1110-1115. [PMID: 27828822 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of fluorescence imaging (FI) using an intraoperative injection of free indocyanine green (ICG) in the detection of peritoneal metastases (PM) due to colorectal cancer (CRC). BACKGROUND A large proportion of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy will have local recurrence. This is, in part, related to the presence of small undetected nodules in the peritoneal cavity. Near-infrared FI-guided surgery has provided new opportunities for detection of nonvisible lesions during cancer surgery. METHODS Patients with PM from CRC admitted for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were selected for participation in this study (NCT02032485). Free ICG, at 0.25 mg/kg of patient weight, was intravenous (IV)-injected intraoperatively. Tumor-to-background ratio was calculated for all suspect resected PM. RESULTS Sixty-three of 78 peritoneal resected nodules in 14 patients were evaluated for fluorescence, among them, 53 were malignant (84%) and 10 benign (16%). Twenty-six were hypofluorescent, 16 moderately hyperfluorescent, and 21 hyperfluorescent. Amongst the 42 nodules of the 9 patients with nonmucinous adenocarcinoma, the mean tumor-to-background ratio was 1.92 (SD 0.67) in malignant and 1.02 (SD 0.06) in benign nodules (P = 0.0099). In 4 of 14 patients (29%), the surgery was modified by intraoperative ICG-FI, which detected additional PM not found using visualization and palpation. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study demonstrates that non-mucinous PM of CRC can be visualized intraoperatively using ICG-FI. Furthermore, ICG-FI findings resulted in modification of the planned surgery in 29% of patients.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kwakman R, Schrama AM, van Olmen JP, Otten RH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, de Cuba EM, Kazemier G, Te Velde EA. Clinicopathological Parameters in Patient Selection for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Metastases: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2017; 263:1102-11. [PMID: 26756756 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve patient selection for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) by evaluating various preoperatively assessable clinicopathological parameters as markers for survival after CRS and HIPEC. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Peritoneal metastases (PMs) originating from colorectal cancer are treated with CRS and HIPEC. Despite increasing survival, high morbidity and mortality warrant selection of patients with optimal benefit from this treatment. Many studies report a number of variables to be associated with survival after CRS and HIPEC, but no definitive analysis has been made to validate various markers. METHODS In concordance with PRISMA guidelines, we performed a literature search encompassing 4110 articles to select 50 articles that reported the influence of 1 or more clinicopathological variables on overall survival after CRS and HIPEC. In absence of RCTs, 25 cohort studies could be used to perform a meta-analysis on 10 prognostic variables. RESULTS We determined that concurrent liver metastasis, lymph node metastasis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor differentiation, and signet ring cell histology are all negative prognostic variables on overall survival after CRS and HIPEC. Conversely, sex and location of primary could not be validated as prognostic markers. More research is required to make definitive conclusions about neoadjuvant chemotherapy, onset of PMs, and mucinous histology. CONCLUSIONS Current clinical practice, which selects patients based on extraperitoneal metastasis, lymph node stage, performance status, and tumor histology, is validated by our pooled analysis. Our data merit further research into neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the setting of CRS and HIPEC for PMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riom Kwakman
- *Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands†Medical Library, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands‡Department of Biomedical Statistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands§Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Morales Soriano R, Morón Canis JM, Molina Romero X, Pérez Celada J, Tejada Gavela S, Segura Sampedro JJ, Jiménez Morillas P, Díaz Jover P, García Pérez JM, Sena Ruiz F, González Argente X. Influence of simultaneous liver and peritoneal resection on postoperative morbi-mortality and survival in patients with colon cancer treated with surgical cytoreduction and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. Cir Esp 2017; 95:214-221. [PMID: 28400138 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Revised: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIPEC) has recently been established as the treatment of choice for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colonic origin. Until recently, the simultaneous presence of peritoneal and hepatic dissemination has been considered a contraindication for surgery. The aim of this paper is to analyze the morbidity, mortality and survival of patients with simultaneous peritoneal and hepatic resection with HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to colon cancer. METHODS Between January 2010 and January 2015, 61 patients were operated on, 16 had simultaneous peritoneal and hepatic dissemination (group RH+), and 45 presented only peritoneal dissemination (group RH-). RESULTS There were no differences between the groups in terms of demographic data, length of surgery and extension of peritoneal disease. Postoperative grade III-V complications were significantly higher in the RH+ group (56.3 vs. 26.6%; P=.032). For the whole group, mortality rate was 3.2% (two patients in group RH-, and none in group RH+). Patients with liver resection had a longer postoperative stay (14.4 vs. 23.1 days) (P=.027). Median overall survival was 33 months for RH-, and 36 for RH+ group. Median disease-free survival was 16 months for RH-, and 24 months for RH+ group. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous peritoneal cytoreduction and hepatic resection resulted in a significantly higher Clavien grade III-V morbidity and a longer hospital stay, although the results are similar to other major abdominal interventions. The application of multimodal oncological and surgical treatment may obtain similar long-term survival results in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Morales Soriano
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España.
| | - José Miguel Morón Canis
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Xavier Molina Romero
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Judit Pérez Celada
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Silvia Tejada Gavela
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Juan José Segura Sampedro
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Patricia Jiménez Morillas
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Paula Díaz Jover
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - José María García Pérez
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Fátima Sena Ruiz
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Xavier González Argente
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ihemelandu C, Sugarbaker PH. Management for Peritoneal Metastasis of Colonic Origin: Role of Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Single Institution’s Experience During Two Decades. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 24:898-905. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5698-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
16
|
Surgical Management of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Centre Experience on Oncological Outcomes of Pulmonary Resection vs Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC. J Gastrointest Cancer 2016; 48:353-360. [PMID: 27864747 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-016-9895-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Metastasectomy is accepted as standard of care for selected patients with colorectal pulmonary metastases (CLM); however, the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) is not universally accepted. We aim to compare oncological outcomes of patients with CLM and CPM after pulmonary resection and CRS-HIPEC, respectively, by comparing overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS A retrospective review of 49 CLM patients who underwent pulmonary resection, and 52 CPM patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC in a single institution from January 2003 to March 2015, was performed. RESULTS The 5-year OS for CLM patients and CPM patients were 59.6 and 40.5%, respectively (p = 0.100), while the 5-year DFS were 24.0 and 14.2%, respectively (p = 0.173). CPM patients had longer median operative time (8.38 vs. 1.75 h, p < 0.001), median hospital stay (13 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001), a higher rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (67.3 vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of high-grade complications (17.3 vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that recurrent lung metastasis after metastasectomy was an independent prognostic factor for OS of CLM patients (OR = 0.045, 95%, CL 0.003-0.622, p = 0.021). There were no independent prognostic factors for OS in CPM patients by multivariate analysis. There were no independent prognostic factors for DFS in CLM patients by multivariate analysis, but peritoneal cancer index score, bladder involvement, and higher nodal stage at presentation of the initial malignancy were independent prognostic factors for DFS in CPM patients. CONCLUSIONS OS and DFS for CPM patients after CRS and HIPEC are comparable to CLM patients after lung resection, although morbidity appears higher. The prognostic factors affecting survival after surgery are different between CPM and CLM patients and must be considered when selecting patients for metastasectomy.
Collapse
|
17
|
Intraperitoneal-Free Cancer Cells Represent a Major Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59:615-22. [PMID: 27270513 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraperitoneal-free cancer cells are considered as an important prognostic tool in gastric and ovarian cancer. However, their significance in colorectal cancer remains more controversial. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the role of intraperitoneal-free cancer cells as a prognostic tool in the outcome in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with curative intent by complete cytoreductive surgery. DESIGN This study is an analysis of a prospectively maintained database. PATIENTS Between 1991 and 2012, all patients treated in a single institution for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis by complete cytoreductive surgery with peritoneal cytology available were evaluated. Peritoneal cytology was stained in the conventional way (May Grumwald Giemsa). RESULTS Among a population of 162 patients treated for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis by complete cytoreductive surgery, 38 presented positive intraperitoneal-free cancer cells (23.5%). Systemic chemotherapy was administered to 135 patients (85%) during the preoperative course. Median follow-up was 34.5 months. Median overall survival was 19 and 44 months for positive and negative intraperitoneal-free cancer cells (p = 0.018). In multivariate analysis, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index and positive intraperitoneal-free cancer cells were significant prognostic factors of overall survival (HR, 2.3 (1.18-4.52), p = 0.014; HR, 1.9 (1.08-3.38), p = 0.027). LIMITATIONS Retrospective analysis and the long period were limitations of study. CONCLUSION Along with the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index, intraperitoneal-free cancer cells are a strong prognostic factor for patients treated with curative intent for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis by complete cytoreductive surgery. The presence of intraperitoneal-free cancer cells should lead to the consideration of different treatment strategies such as extensive intraperitoneal lavage, targeted intraperitoneal therapies, or repeated intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ohkura Y, Shinohara H, Haruta S, Ueno M, Hashimoto M, Sakai Y, Udagawa H. Hepatectomy Offers Superior Survival Compared with Non-surgical Treatment for ≤ 3 Metastatic Tumors with Diameters < 3 cm from Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study. World J Surg 2016; 39:2757-63. [PMID: 26148522 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3151-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A consensus has almost been reached in favor of hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases. It remains unclear whether resection of gastric cancer metastases in the liver is justified. The purpose of this study was to assess the survival benefit of surgical resection for gastric cancer metastases confined to the liver. METHODS We reviewed the clinicopathological features and outcome of 107 patients with liver metastases without other non-curative factors from the case records of 5437 gastric cancer patients. These subjects included 34 synchronous cases with tumors present at the time of gastrectomy and 73 metachronous cases with new lesions that appeared after radical gastrectomy. RESULTS Hepatectomies were performed in nine synchronous and four metachronous cases that had ≤3 tumors with diameters <3 cm. The overall survival rates after hepatectomy were significantly higher than those in eligible candidates who did not receive hepatectomy despite having comparable metastatic status (synchronous, n = 8, p = 0.009; metachronous, n = 24, p = 0.016). The survival rate of patients who underwent hepatectomy for synchronous metastases was not inferior to that of patients who underwent hepatectomy for metachronous metastases. The median disease-free interval in metachronous cases was significantly shorter in patients who did not undergo resection than those who underwent resection. However, multivariate analyses revealed that hepatectomy was the only significant (p = 0.001) prognostic factor whereas DFI was not. CONCLUSIONS Hepatectomy for ≤3 metastatic tumors with diameters <3 cm offered superior survival compared with non-surgical treatment even for metastases detected synchronously or within a short period after radical gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Ohkura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisashi Shinohara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Shusuke Haruta
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaki Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaji Hashimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiharu Sakai
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Harushi Udagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Prognostic Relevance of the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score Compared to the Peritoneal Cancer Index for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Int J Surg Oncol 2016; 2016:2495131. [PMID: 27006828 PMCID: PMC4781959 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2495131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2015] [Revised: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) is a widely established scoring system that describes disease burden in isolated colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC). Its significance may be diminished with complete cytoreduction. We explore the utility of the recently described Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS) and compare its prognostic value against PCI. METHODS The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and survival less than 18 months (18 MS). RESULTS Fifty patients underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for CPC from 2003 to 2014, with 98% achieving complete cytoreduction. Median OS was 28.8 months (95% CI, 18.0-39.1); median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.7-13.9). Univariate analysis showed that higher PCI was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20) and PFS (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14). Conversely, PSDSS was not associated with either endpoint. Multivariate analysis showed that PCI, but not PSDSS, was predictive of OS and PFS. PCI was also able to discriminate survival outcomes better than PSDSS for both OS and PFS. There was no association between 18 MS and either score. CONCLUSION PCI is superior to PSDSS in predicting OS and PFS and remains the prognostic score of choice in CPC patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC.
Collapse
|
20
|
Baratti D, Kusamura S, Pietrantonio F, Guaglio M, Niger M, Deraco M. Progress in treatments for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases during the years 2010-2015. A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016; 100:209-22. [PMID: 26867984 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Revised: 11/25/2015] [Accepted: 01/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) were traditionally associated with bad prognosis. Only recently, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has resulted in survival improvements. A systematic literature search between January 2010 and June 2015 was performed. Studies were selected and appraised according to predetermined criteria. Nineteen cohort studies, and thirteen comparative studies of CRS/HIPEC were included. The weighted median overall survival was 31.6 months (range 16-51). Major morbidity was 17.6-52.4% (weighted average 32.6%). Mortality was 0-8.1% (weighted average 2.9%). Additional relevant topics, such as CRC-PM prevalence, results by systemic therapies, preoperative work-up, and technical aspects were summarized through a narrative review. The recent literature suggests that CRS/HIPEC is gaining acceptance as standard of care for selected CRC-PM patients. Refinement of selection criteria, and rationalization of comprehensive systemic and local-regional management is ongoing. Prevention and early treatment of PM are new and promising options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Baratti
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian, 1 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian, 1 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian, 1 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Marcello Guaglio
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian, 1 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Monica Niger
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian, 1 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Marcello Deraco
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian, 1 20133 Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lungoci C, Mironiuc AI, Muntean V, Oniu T, Leebmann H, Mayr M, Piso P. Multimodality treatment strategies have changed prognosis of peritoneal metastases. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 8:67-82. [PMID: 26798438 PMCID: PMC4714147 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i1.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Revised: 09/22/2015] [Accepted: 11/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
For a long time, treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM) was mostly palliative and thus, this status was link with “terminal status/despair”. The current multimodal treatment strategy, consisting of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), has been strenuously achieved over time, but seems to be the best treatment option for PM patients. As we reviewed the literature data, we could emphasize some milestones and also, controversies in the history of proposed multimodal treatment and thus, outline the philosophy of this approach, which seems to be an unusual one indeed. Initially marked by nihilism and fear, but benefiting from a remarkable joint effort of human and material resources (multi-center and -institutional research), over a period of 30 years, CRS and HIPEC found their place in the treatment of PM. The next 4 years were dedicated to the refinement of the multimodal treatment, by launching research pathways. In selected patients, with requires training, it demonstrated a significant survival results (similar to the Hepatic Metastases treatment), with acceptable risks and costs. The main debates regarding CRS and HIPEC treatment were based on the oncologists’ perspective and the small number of randomized clinical trials. It is important to statement the PM patient has the right to be informed of the existence of CRS and HIPEC, as a real treatment resource, the decision being made by multidisciplinary teams.
Collapse
|
22
|
Schorge JO, Clark RM, Lee SI, Penson RT. Primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: Are you a believer or a dissenter? Gynecol Oncol 2014; 135:595-605. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2014] [Revised: 10/01/2014] [Accepted: 10/07/2014] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|