Outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by esophagectomy in patients with resectable node-positive esophageal cancer

Docetaxel-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by En Bloc Resection for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A 15-Year Retrospective Analysis from a Regional Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Network

BACKROUND

Real-world, long-term survival outcomes of neoadjuvant, docetaxel-based therapy for esophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma are lacking. This study describes the long-term survival outcomes of patients with esophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy and en bloc transthoracic esophagectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively maintained database from a regional upper gastrointestinal cancer network in Quebec, Canada, was performed. From January 2007 to December 2021, all patients with locally advanced (cT3 and/or N1) esophageal/Siewert I/II adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant DCFx3 (Docetaxel/Cisplatin/5FU) or FLOTx4 (5FU/Leucovorin/Oxaliplatin/Docetaxel) and transthoracic en bloc esophagectomy were identified. Postoperative, pathological, and survival outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 236 of 420 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tumor location was esophageal/Siewert I/Siewert II (118/33/85), most were cT3-4 (93.6%) and cN+ (61.0%). DCF and FLOT were used in 127 of 236 (53.8%) and 109 of 236 (46.2%). All neoadjuvant cycles were completed in 87.3% with no difference between the regimens. Operative procedures included Ivor Lewis (81.8%), left thoraco-abdominal esophagectomy (10.6%) and McKeown (7.6%) with an R0 resection in 95.3% and pathological complete response in 9.7% (DCF 12.6%/FLOT 6.4%, p = 0.111). The median lymph node yield was 32 (range 4-79), and 60.6% were ypN+. Median follow-up was longer for the DCF group (74.8 months 95% confidence interval [CI] 4-173 vs. 37.8 months 95% CI 2-119, p <0.001. Overall survival was similar between the groups (FLOT 97.3 months, 78.6-115.8 vs. DCF 92.9, 9.2-106.5, p = 0.420).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant DCF and FLOT followed by transthoracic en bloc resection are both highly effective regimens for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma with equivalent survival outcomes despite high disease load.

Prognosis of patients with residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil therapy and surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) combination chemotherapy has been established as one of the standard neoadjuvant therapies for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, little is known about prognostic factors in patients with residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant DCF followed by surgery for locally advanced ESCC who are candidates for adjuvant nivolumab.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors in patients with residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant DCF chemotherapy followed by surgery for locally advanced ESCC.

Design

This was a retrospective cohort study.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients who received neoadjuvant DCF followed by surgery for locally advanced ESCC between June 2014 and January 2020 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East.

Results

Among a total of 210 patients, 45 patients (21.4%) achieved a pathological complete response. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was significantly lower in patients with residual pathological disease than in those with a pathological complete response [53.5% versus 74.5%; hazard ratio (HR): 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-3.77, p = 0.01]. In patients with residual pathological disease (n = 165), multivariate analysis revealed that pathological node positivity (HR: 3.59, 95% CI: 1.92-6.71, p < 0.01), supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.19-3.90, p = 0.01), and lymphovascular invasion (HR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.14-3.17, p = 0.02) were significantly associated with poor DFS.

Conclusion

In this largest-to-date cohort study, patients with residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant DCF followed by surgery for locally advanced ESCC had a poor prognosis. In these patients, pathological node positivity, including supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion were considered significant prognostic factors.

Total neoadjuvant therapy in oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction represent a large burden of cancer death in the Western World with an increasing incidence. In the past two decades, the overall survival of patients on a potentially curative treatment pathway has more than doubled due to the addition of perioperative oncological therapies to surgery. However, patients often fail to respond to oncological treatment or struggle to complete their treatment after surgery. In this review, we discuss the current evidence for total neoadjuvant therapy and options for assessment of treatment response.

Accurate Preoperative Evaluation of the Location of Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma Using Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

The surgical procedure for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma usually depends on the location of its epicenter or proximal margin, but accurate evaluation of these positions is often difficult. The usefulness of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for this purpose is unknown.

METHODS

Between June 2005 and February 2015, we enrolled 30 patients with cT2-4 EGJ adenocarcinoma (Siewert type I/II) who underwent surgical resection. We ascertained the sensitivity and specificity of preoperative PET-CT for identifying the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastasis, and compared PET-CT and pathological findings in terms of the distance from the EGJ to the tumor epicenter or proximal tumor margin.

RESULTS

PET-CT detected the primary tumor with a sensitivity of 97% (29/30), and detected lymph node metastasis with a sensitivity and specificity of 22% (4/18) and 100% (8/8), respectively. No significant association was observed between the maximal standardized uptake value and histological type, tumor size, or pT status. Regarding the accuracy of evaluating tumor location, the median differences between PET-CT and pathological measurements were .6 cm for the tumor epicenter and .5 cm for the proximal margin from the EGJ. PET-CT and pathological findings showed agreement regarding Siewert classification type (I or II) and lengths of esophageal involvement exceeding 4 cm or 2 cm in 77% (10/13), 85% (11/13), and 85% (11/13) of cases, respectively.

DISCUSSION

PET-CT had high sensitivity for primary EGJ adenocarcinoma. It may effectively locate the tumor epicenter and proximal margin and thus help clinicians determine the optimal surgical procedure.

Microscopic venous invasion is a predictor of prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is Japan's most effective treatment modality for advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the prognosis is not as expected. This study aimed to examine prognostic factors in patients with pathologically ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between December 2008 and July 2021. The patients were divided into the neoadjuvant chemotherapy effective group and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy ineffective group according to the pathological diagnosis. Clinicopathological data, prognosis, and recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients (121 males, 22 females; median age, 67 years) were included in this study. Of these, 34 patients were classified into the effective group and the remaining 109 patients were assigned to the ineffective group. The ineffective group had significantly worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival than the effective group (p = 0.0192 and p = 0.0070, respectively). In the ineffective group, multivariate analysis demonstrated that microscopic venous invasion was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 2.44; 95% confidence interval 1.13-5.30) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.43; 95% confidence interval 1.24-4.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Microscopic venous invasion was associated with poor survival and cancer recurrence in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy ineffective group of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant Triplet Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil versus Docetaxel, Cisplatin plus S-1 for Advanced Esophageal Squamous cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study examines whether neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin plus S-1 (DCS) therapy is superior to docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with resectable advanced ESCC at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2019 underwent either neoadjuvant DCF therapy or DCS therapy, followed by radical esophagectomy. Prior to August 2014, we usually used neoadjuvant DCF therapy; we then completely transitioned to using neoadjuvant DCS therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients received one of these triplet regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy: DCF therapy to 67 patients and DCS therapy to 77 patients. After propensity score matching, 55 patients in each group were selected as matched cohorts. There was no significant difference between the groups in complete response (DCF = 7.3%, DCS = 9.1%) or in partial response (DCF = 45.4%, DCS = 52.7%). The pathological response rate was 23.8% for grade 2 and 18.2% for grade 3 in the DCF group, compared with 30.9% and 14.5% in the DCS group. Independent predictive factors for recurrence-free survival were poor clinical response and pathological response ≤1b. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were poor clinical response, anastomotic leakage, and pathological response ≤1b. Duration of hospital stays in the DCS group was significantly shorter than those of the DCF group (6.0 vs. 15.0 days, p < 0.001). Expenses of drug and hospitalization for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the DCS group were also significantly lower than those of the DCF group (265.7 vs. 550.3 USD, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant DCS therapy for resectable advanced ESCC did not result in significantly higher clinical and pathological response than neoadjuvant DCF therapy. However, neoadjuvant DCS therapy for resectable ESCC required comparatively shorter hospital stays and incurred lower costs, making it an attractive therapeutic option.

Impact of preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy on degree of malignant esophageal stenosis

BACKGROUND

Malignant esophageal stenosis is a common and severe complication of advanced esophageal cancer that can be a serious problem in the continuation of chemotherapy and other anticancer treatments. The impact of chemotherapy regimens on the degree of improvement in esophageal stenosis is unknown. In this study, we focused on the impacts of chemotherapy on the direct anticancer effects, and in the improvement of malignant stenosis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent radical esophagectomy after chemotherapy, either adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) or docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen, were included. We assessed the length of the cancerous stenosis, the width of the narrowest segment, and the size of the intraluminal area in the stenotic segment by fluoroscopy, and compared the differences before and after chemotherapy. In addition, we evaluated the dysphagia score (Mellow-Pinkas scoring system) as the evaluation of patients' symptoms. The antitumor effects of chemotherapy were also investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were enrolled: 50 were treated with FP, and 31 were treated with DCF. The expansion rate in the length of the narrowest part was significantly increased in the DCF group compared with the FP group. Furthermore, the stenosis index (intraluminal stenotic area/stenotic length) was significantly increased in the DCF group compared with the FP group (112% vs 96%, P = 0.038). Dysphagia score after chemotherapy significantly improved in the DCF group compared to the FP group (P = 0.007). The response rates were 60% in the FP group and 67.7% in the DCF group. Effective histopathological response (improvement to grade 2 or 3) was 24% in the FP group and 38.8% in the DCF group.

CONCLUSION

DCF therapy is more effective than FP treatment in the improvement of malignant esophageal stenosis.

Neoadjuvant Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy in Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) are the standard treatments in patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Adding PD-1 inhibitor to the chemotherapy has shown significant clinical benefits in first-line treatment of advanced ESCC. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy in patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

The clinical data of 96 patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC, treated with sintilimab plus chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy, were reviewed. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, R0 resection rate, tumor downstaging, survival, and safety were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Patients were between the ages of 43 and 78 years (interquartile range [IQR], 60–69 years). Forty (41.7%) were diagnosed with stage II ESCC, 52 (54.2%) with stage III, and 4 (4.2%) with stage IVA. Sixty-seven (69.8%) were male, and 84 (87.5%) patients had an ECOG PS of ≤1. Forty-eight (50.0%) patients received 3–4 cycles of the neoadjuvant treatment. Twenty-nine (30.2%) patients obtained pCR, and MPR was achieved in 60 (62.5%) patients. The R0 resection rate was 99%. Eighty (83.3%) patients achieved clinical downstaging, and 71 (74.0%) achieved pathological downstaging. The median follow-up was 8.9 months, and 1-year DFS rate was 95.2% (95% CI, 88.8%–100%). Grade 3–4 TRAEs occurred in 12 (12.5%) patients, and the incidence of grade 3–4 surgical complications was 2.1%. No deaths were reported.

Conclusion

These real-world data revealed that neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy could provide encouraging pCR with good tolerability for resectable locally advanced ESCC, and this regimen warrants further exploration in prospective clinical studies.

The Anti-Proliferative and Apoptotic Effects of Rutaecarpine on Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Line CE81T/VGH In Vitro and In Vivo

The overall five-year survival rate for patients with esophageal cancer is low (15 to 25%) because of the poor prognosis at earlier stages. Rutaecarpine (RTP) is a bioalkaloid found in the traditional Chinese herb Evodia rutaecarpa and has been shown to exhibit anti-proliferative effect on tumor cells. However, the mechanisms by which RTP confer these effects and its importance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treatment remain unclear. Thus, in the present study, we first incubated human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line, CE81T/VGH, with RTP to evaluate RTP’s effects on tumor cell growth and apoptosis. We also performed a xenograft study to confirm the in vitro findings. Furthermore, we determined the expression of p53, Bax, bcl-2, caspase-3, caspase-9, and PCNA in CE81T/VGH cells or the tumor tissues to investigate the possible mechanisms. All the effects of TRP were compared with that of cisplatin. The results showed that RTP significantly inhibits CE81T/VGH cell growth, promotes arrest of cells in the G₂/M phase, and induces apoptosis. Consistently, the in vivo study showed that tumor size, tumor weight, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen protein expression in tumor tissue are significantly reduced in the high-dose RTP treatment group. Furthermore, the in vitro and in vivo studies showed that RTP increases the expression of p53 and Bax proteins, while inhibiting the expression of Bcl-2 in cancer cells. In addition, RTP significantly increases the expression of cleaved caspase-9 and cleaved caspase-3 proteins in tumor tissues in mice. These results suggest that RTP may trigger the apoptosis and inhibit growth in CE81T/VGH cells by the mechanisms associated with the regulation of the expression of p53, Bax, Bcl-2, as well as caspase-9 and caspase-3.

Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study

AIMS

The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5-FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim, we conducted a phase II study.

METHODS

The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m² per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m² per day) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5-FU (750 mg/m² per day) on days 1-5. A single 3.6-mg dose of pegfilgrastim was given as a subcutaneous injection on day 7 of each cycle. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The primary endpoint was the grade-2/3 histopathological response rate.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven eligible patients were enrolled and received DCF. Thirty-four patients underwent esophagectomy. Two patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery. One patient withdrew consent and ended his hospital visit. One patient received additional radiotherapy before surgery. Histopathological responses of grade 3, grade 2, grade 1b, and grade 1a were observed in two (5.4%), 14 (37.8%), 10 (27.0%), and seven (18.9%) patients, respectively, and the primary endpoint was met. Of the 37 eligible patients, 11 (29.7%) developed FN in the first cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the histopathological responses were as expected, DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is considered to be effective as preoperative chemotherapy. However, the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim on day 7 was insufficient to prevent FN.

Early dynamics of circulating tumor DNA predict chemotherapy responses for patients with esophageal cancer

We investigated whether early circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) changes, measured using digital PCR (dPCR), can predict later chemotherapy responses in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). We compared the dynamics of ctDNA and tumor volumes during chemotherapy in 42 ESCC. The accuracy of predictions of later chemotherapy responses was evaluated by the ratio of the variant allele frequency of ctDNA (post-/pre-ctDNA) and the total tumor volume (post-/pre-volume) before and after an initial chemotherapy cycle using a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Total positive and negative objective responses (ORs) were defined as either >50 or ≤50% reductions, respectively, in the total tumor volume at the end of first-line chemotherapy. Mutation screening of 43 tumors from 42 patients revealed 96 mutations. The pretreatment dPCR-ctDNA data were informative in 38 patients, using 70 selected mutations (1-3 per patient). The areas under the curve (AUCs) for the post-/pre-volume and post-/pre-ctDNA levels used in predicting the total OR were 0.85 and 0.88, respectively. The optimal cutoff value of post-/pre-ctDNA was 0.13. In 20 patients with post-/pre-volume ≥50%, the total OR could be predicted by the post-/pre-ctDNA with high accuracy; the AUC by post-/pre-ctDNA was higher than that by post-/pre-volume (0.85 versus 0.76, respectively). Patients with low post-/pre-ctDNA (n = 18) had a significantly better overall survival rate than those with high post-/pre-ctDNA (n = 20; P = 0.03). Early ctDNA changes after an initial cycle of chemotherapy predict later responses to treatment with high accuracy in ESCC patients.

Recent Progress in the Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Neoadjuvant therapies, primarily chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, are able to improve the overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer (EC) based on the results of several randomized clinical trials. The advantage of neoadjuvant therapy is chiefly attributed to the decreased risk of local-regional recurrence and distant metastasis. Thus, it has been recommended as standard treatment for patients with resectable EC. However, several fundamental problems remain. First, the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), and surgery for EC patients with different histological types remain controversial. Furthermore, to reduce the toxicity of preoperative chemotherapy and the risk of complications caused by preoperative radiation therapy, the treatment protocols of nCT and nCRT still need to be investigated and optimized by prospective trials. Moreover, for patients with complete clinical response following neoadjuvant therapy, it is worth ascertaining whether a "watch and wait" surveillance plus surgery-as-needed policy is more favorable, as well as, in addition to preoperative chemoradiotherapy, whether immunotherapy, especially when combined with the traditional neoadjuvant therapy regimens, brings new prospects for EC treatment. In this review, we summarize the recent insights into the research progress and existing problems of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced resectable EC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

S-1 shows good efficacy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) under single use or combined with cisplatin or radiotherapy. The S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) regimen is one of the chemotherapy candidates for ESCC. However, the efficacy of the SP regimen for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not been verified. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of NAC with SP for advanced ESCC. In this study, patients with clinical stage II/III/IV ESCC received NAC with SP regimen from June 2016 to July 2020 in Ogaki Municipal Hospital were retrospectively evaluated. In the SP regimen, S-1 80 mg/m² was administered on days 1-14, and cisplatin was administered 70 mg/m² on day 1, repeated every 4 weeks, for two cycles. The completion rate, clinical and pathological response rate, adverse events, and long-term outcomes were analyzed. 43 ESCC patients were diagnosed clinical stage II/III/IV ESCC. Among the 43 patients, 31 patients underwent NAC with SP regimen. The completion rate was 93.5%. The clinical response and pathological response rates (grade 2 or 3) were 83.9% and 32.3%, respectively. Seven patients (22.6%) had a pathological complete response (grade 3). Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 33.7% of cases. No other grade 3 cases or higher toxicity was observed. The 3-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 52.6% and 65.6%, respectively. NAC with SP is a feasible and effective treatment strategy for advanced. ESCC. The antitumor response could be higher than that under the cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil regimen.

Positron emission tomography complete metabolic response as a favorable prognostic predictor in esophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil

BACKGROUND

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography is useful in diagnosing lymph node and distant metastases of esophageal cancer. However, its value for predicting survival is controversial.

AIM

To evaluate the value of PET complete metabolic response (CMR) as a prognostic predictor for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Between June 2013 and December 2017, 58 patients with squamous cell esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in Oita University were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Tumors were clinically staged using fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography before and after NAC. After NAC, maximal standardized uptake value ≤ 2.5 was defined as PET-CMR, and maximal standardized uptake value > 2.5 was defined as non-PET-CMR. We compared short-term outcomes between the PET-CMR group and non-PET-CMR group and evaluated prognostic factors by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The PET-CMR group included 22 patients, and the non-PET-CMR group included 36 patients. There were no significant differences in intraoperative and postoperative complications between the two groups. Five-year relapse-free survival and overall survival in the PET-CMR group were significantly more favorable than those in the non-PET-CMR group (38.6 mo vs 20.8 mo, P = 0.021; 42.8 mo vs 25.1 mo, P = 0.011, respectively). PET-CMR was a significant prognostic factor in terms of relapse-free survival by univariate analysis (hazard ratio: 2.523; 95% confidence interval: 1.034–7.063; P < 0.041). Particularly, PET-computed tomography negative N was an independent prognostic factor of relapse-free survival and overall survival by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

PET-CMR after NAC is considered a favorable prognostic factor for esophageal cancer. Evaluation by PET-computed tomography could be useful in clinical decision making for esophageal cancer.

Effects of SLC31A1 and ATP7B polymorphisms on platinum resistance in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

The relationship between the SLC31A1 (protein: copper transporter 1) rs10981694 A > C and ATP7B (protein: P-type adenosine triphosphatase 7B) rs9535828 A > G polymorphisms on the overall survival and disease-free survival of 104 Japanese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was investigated. Chemotherapy consisted of protracted infusion of 5-fluoracil (800 mg/m²/day) on days 1-5 and cisplatin or nedaplatin (80 mg/m²/day) on day 1. The median (range) follow-up was 47 (6-127) months. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 71.2% and 60.6%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in patients with the SLC31A1 rs10981694 C allele compared with the rs10981694 A/A genotype (91.7% vs. 65.0%, P = 0.018). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in patients with the SLC31A1 rs10981694 C allele compared with the rs10981694 A/A genotype (79.2% vs. 55.0%, P = 0.043). In addition, univariate and multivariate analyses showed the SLC31A1 rs10981694 A > C polymorphism to be a significant prognostic factor affecting 5-year overall survival after neoadjuvant CRT. However, the overall and disease-free survival rates after surgery did not differ significantly among the ATP7B rs9535828 genotypes. In conclusion, only the SLC31A1 rs10981694 A/A genotype was an independent predictor of a poorer 5-year overall survival. Therefore, in neoadjuvant CRT for ESCC patients, the effect of platinum was affected by the SLC31A1 rs10981694 A > C polymorphism. The presence of this polymorphism should be considered when devising neoadjuvant CRT regimens or treatment strategies for ESCC.

Clinical Significance of Prognostic Nutritional Index in the Treatment of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is reported to affect postoperative complications and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical significance of PNI in treatment of ESCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and sixty-three patients who underwent radical esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed. PNI was calculated in the pretreatment (pre-Tx), post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (post-NAC), and postoperative periods.

RESULTS

Pre-Tx PNI positively correlated with prognosis irrespective of undergoing NAC (p<0.05). In the patients with NAC, pre-Tx PNI was one of the independent prognostic factors (p=0.04). In patients with low pre-Tx PNI, the prognosis was improved by increase of PNI after NAC (p=0.08), and two cycles of NAC significantly correlated with high post-NAC PNI (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Pre-Tx PNI is an independent prognostic factor irrespective of NAC. Patients in whom the post-NAC PNI can be improved have a high probability of obtaining a good prognosis.

Clinical Significance of Pretherapeutic Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen Level in Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) is a tumor marker widely used to estimate the progression of esophageal SCC (ESCC), only a few studies have focused on the relationship between serum SCC-Ag levels and the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to elucidate the clinical significance of pretherapeutic serum SCC-Ag levels in patients who underwent NAC followed by esophagectomy.

METHODS

Data of 453 patients who underwent NAC followed by esophagectomy were collected from the esophageal cancer database of two high-volume Japanese centers. Serum SCC-Ag levels were measured prior to NAC, and the pathological therapeutic effect of NAC and patient survival were evaluated. Patients were classified according to the tertiles of the serum SCC-Ag value (low, middle, and high groups), and the outcomes among the groups were compared.

RESULTS

The levels of serum SCC-Ag were significantly associated with tumor stage (p < 0.01). With regard to the pathological therapeutic effect, the levels of serum SCC-Ag were negatively correlated with the therapeutic effect (p = 0.02). Moreover, increased levels of serum SCC-Ag negatively influenced relapse-free survival (p < 0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed the 'high' group as the independent factor for both the unfavorable therapeutic effect (p = 0.01) and the increased risk of disease recurrence (p < 0.01) when compared with the 'low' group.

CONCLUSION

Elevated levels of pretherapeutic serum SCC-Ag are significantly associated with advanced tumor stage, poor response to NAC, and increased risk of disease recurrence.

RAD51 Expression as a Biomarker to Predict Efficacy of Preoperative Therapy and Survival for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Large-cohort Observational Study (KSCC1307)

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to identify biomarkers that predict efficacy of preoperative therapy and survival for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

BACKGROUND

It is essential to improve the accuracy of preoperative molecular diagnostics to identify specific patients who will benefit from the treatment; thus, this issue should be resolved with a large-cohort, retrospective observational study.

METHODS

A total of 656 patients with ESCC who received surgery after preoperative CDDP + 5-FU therapy, docetaxel + CDDP + 5-FU therapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were enrolled. Immunohistochemical analysis of TP53, CDKN1A, RAD51, MutT-homolog 1, and programmed death-ligand 1 was performed with biopsy samples obtained before preoperative therapy, and expression was measured by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In all therapy groups, overall survival was statistically separated by pathological effect (grade 3 > grade 2 > grade 0, 1, P < 0.0001). There was no correlation between TP53, CDKN1A, MutT-homolog 1, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and pathological effect, whereas the proportion of positive RAD51 expression (≥50%) in cases with grade 3 was lower than that with grade 0, 1, and 2 (P = 0.022). In the CRT group, the survival of patients with RAD51-positive tumor was significantly worse than RAD51-negative expressors (P = 0.0119). Subgroup analysis of overall survival with respect to positive RAD51 expression indicated preoperative chemotherapy (CDDP + 5-FU or docetaxel + CDDP + 5-FU) was superior to CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

In ESCC, positive RAD51 expression was identified as a useful biomarker to predict resistance to preoperative therapy and poor prognosis in patients who received preoperative CRT. Administration of preoperative chemotherapy may be warranted for patients with positive RAD51 expression.

Intranodal lymphangiography for chyle leakage after esophagectomy: A case report

Postoperative chylothorax after esophagectomy is a relatively rare complication, but treatment can sometimes be complicated. We report 3 cases of Lipiodol lymphangiography via inguinal lymph node puncture that was effective for chyle leakage occurring after esophagectomy. Case 1: A 67-year-old man with stage IIIA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent radical esophagectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). After enteral feeding, right pleural effusion drainage increased sharply and changed to white color that was diagnosed as chylothorax. Conservative treatment was started on postoperative day (POD) 15. On POD 50, intranodal Lipiodol lymphangiography and thoracic duct ligation were performed, resulting in complete improvement by the next day. Case 2: A 69-year-old man with stage IIIC esophageal cancer was treated salvage operation following chemoradiation. Postoperative chylothorax was diagnosed on POD 6. Despite conservative treatment, the pleural fluid volume did not decrease. Intranodal Lipiodol lymphangiography performed on POD 13 showed contrast medium draining from the thoracic duct near the tracheal bifurcation. Thoracotomy for thoracic duct ligation was performed on POD 15. Thereafter, drainage from the thoracic drain decreased significantly, and the right thoracic drain was removed 4 days later. Case 3: A 65-year-old man with Stage IVA hypopharyngeal cancer and Stage IIIA esophageal cancer underwent total pharyngopharyngeal esophagectomy by VATS following NAC. Postoperative chylothorax was diagnosed on POD 7. Despite conservative treatment, the pleural fluid volume did not decrease. Intranodal Lipiodol lymphangiography performed on POD 19 completely visualized the thoracic duct and showed no outflow of contrast from the main thoracic duct into the mediastinum. Pleural fluid decreased remarkably after lymphangiography. Intranodal Lipiodol lymphangiography for postoperative chylothorax accurately visualizes flow within the thoracic duct and clearly depicts its positional relationship with other organs. Besides lymphangiography is not only helps to determine the site of chyle leakage but can also be effective for curing chylothorax by less invasive and safer method.

Clinical outcomes according to the modified endoscopic criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) followed by surgery is one of the standard treatments for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, endoscopic evaluation of a primary lesion is not recommended during nCT because of reduced objectivity. This study aimed to develop and validate endoscopic evaluation criteria for nCT.

METHODS

This study retrospectively investigated patients with T2/3 ESCC who underwent nCT followed by radical esophagectomy across two institutions (test and validation sets). We retrospectively estimated the therapeutic effect by classifying patients according to degree of tumor shrinkage (evaluated with endoscopy) as follows: marked reduction (MR), half reduction (HR), insufficient reduction (IR), and progressive disease (PD). Three endoscopists evaluated patients in the test set. Another three endoscopists evaluated patients in the validation set. We analyzed recurrence-free survival (RFS) 3 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Of 129 patients in the test set, 44 had MR, 35 had HR, 44 had IR, and six had PD. The 3-year RFS rates were 55% (overall), 79% (MR), 54% (HR), 35% (IR), and 33% (PD). Of 91 patients in the validation set, 22 had MR, 49 had HR, 18 had IR, and two had PD. The 3-year RFS rates were 54% (overall), 77% (MR), 55% (HR), 22% (IR), and 50% (PD).

CONCLUSIONS

Our endoscopic criteria for nCT predicted prognosis; however, future studies are needed to further investigate our criteria before general application in the clinical setting.

Clinical significance of evaluating endoscopic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Clinical significance of endoscopic response (ER) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for esophageal cancer has not been fully understood. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the association between ER to NAC and its clinicopathological outcomes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

In total, 141 patients who underwent NAC and subsequent esophagectomy for ESCC were included. ER to NAC was retrospectively evaluated based on macroscopic findings of the primary tumor, which was classified into three categories: endoscopic no response (eNR), endoscopic partial response (ePR), and endoscopic good response (eGR). An endoscopic responder was defined as patients with eGR/ePR.

RESULTS

Approximately 89.4% of patients had cStage II-III disease, and 7.1% had pathological complete response. Upon ER evaluation, eNR, ePR, and eGR were observed in 46 (32.6%), 54 (38.3%), and 41 (29.1%) patients, respectively. Pathological responders significantly increased as the ER grade became better. Among preoperative clinical factors, only ER significantly correlated with pathological response in univariate and multivariate analysis. Endoscopic responders showed a significantly better prognosis than did eNR patients (P < 0.001), although the overall survival (OS) of the patients with eGR and ePR was equivalent. Endoscopic responder, ypT, ypN, and pathological responder were significant predictors of OS in the univariate analysis, and endoscopic responder, ypN, and pathological responder were independent predictors in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that ER can be a simple and important tool to predict the pathological response and survival of patients who undergo NAC for ESCC.

Intratumoral Fusobacterium Nucleatum Levels Predict Therapeutic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Emerging evidence indicates that gut microbiome plays a crucial role in the cancer pathogenesis. Although Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum) is associated with poor prognosis in multiple cancers, its clinical significance in predicting response to chemotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The F. nucleatum levels were quantified by qPCR assays in tumor tissues from 551 patients with ESCC from two independent cohorts, including 101 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to curative resection. Associations between F. nucleatum burden and recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well with chemotherapeutic response were evaluated using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECISTs), primary tumor metabolic response defined by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) changes in positron emission tomography-CT (PET/CT), and pathologic tumor regression grade (TRG).

RESULTS

High burden of F. nucleatum in patients with ESCC associated with poor RFS in both training [log-rank P = 0.02; HR = 1.61; P = 0.03] and validation cohorts (log-rank P = 0.003; HR = 1.96; P = 0.004). Importantly, patients with ESCC with high levels of F. nucleatum displayed poor chemotherapeutic response for all three evaluation methods: RECIST (P = 0.04), SUVmax change in PET/CT (P = 0.0004), and TRG (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that high levels of intratumoral F. nucleatum have a prognostic significance for predicting poor RFS in patients with ESCC. More importantly, our data indicates that higher F. nucleatum burden correlates with poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, suggesting the possibility that an antibiotic intervention against this bacterium may significantly improve therapeutic response in patients with ESCC.

Significance of Intramural Metastasis in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Indicator of Aggressive Cancer Behavior

BACKGROUND

Intramural metastasis (IM) is occasionally noted in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, few recent studies have investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of IM and its survival impact. The present study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of IM in patients with ESCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 918 consecutive patients who underwent curative intent esophagectomy for ESCC. IM was defined as a pathologically confirmed metastatic lesion, which was clearly separate from the primary tumor and located within the esophageal or gastric wall. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival impact of IM were evaluated. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to further elucidate the prognostic impact of IM.

RESULTS

Among 918 patients, 46 (5.0%) had IM. Advanced tumors were significantly more frequent in patients with IM than in those without IM. The curative resection rate was lower in patients with IM (P = 0.001). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were worse in patients with IM (both P < 0.001). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, IM presence was an independent poor prognostic indicator for OS and DSS (both P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, advanced tumors according to pathological N stage and lymphatic invasion were more frequent in patients with IM (P = 0.015 and 0.004, respectively). Additionally, OS and DSS were different between patients with and those without IM (both P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

IM from ESCC is a local indicator of lymphatic invasion and advanced cancer, as well as an independent factor for poor prognosis.

Neoadjuvant treatment strategy for locally advanced thoracic esophageal cancer

Multimodal treatment combining surgery with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy is necessary to improve the chances of survival in patients with locally advanced thoracic esophageal cancer. Based on the results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9907 (JCOG9907) trial, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, two courses of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), followed by esophagectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is the recommended treatment in Japan. Alternatively, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) typified by carboplatin and paclitaxel plus concurrent radiotherapy with 41.4 Gy (Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer followed by Surgery Study [CROSS]) has shown promising outcomes in some Western countries. Currently, several clinical trials are being conducted within and outside of Japan to confirm the best neoadjuvant treatment regimen. For instance, a three-arm phase III randomized controlled trial (JCOG1109) is ongoing in Japan. The three arms comprise a doublet regimen (two courses of cisplatin 80 mg/m2 day 1 and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 days 1-5; repeated every 3 weeks) versus a triplet regimen (three courses of docetaxel, 70 mg/m2 day 1; cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 1; and 5-FU 750 mg/m2 days 1-5; repeated every 3 weeks) versus a chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimen (radiotherapy of 41.4 Gy/23 fractions with two courses of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 days 1-4; repeated every 4 weeks). Development of a multimodal strategy for neoadjuvant therapy is expected to receive the continuous focus of research in the hope of achieving better outcomes from treatment of patients with advanced thoracic esophageal cancer.

The role of pretreatment prognostic nutritional index in esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of esophageal cancer (EC) patients with decreased prognostic nutritional index (PNI) have not been well investigated. So, we conducted this meta‐analysis. We performed comprehensive research in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The effect size was hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS). The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI were used to assess the association between PNI and clinicopathological features. A total of 3,425 EC patients were included in the present meta‐analysis. Male patients, advanced age, higher tumor stage, and lymph node metastases were associated with reduced PNI level (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.10‐1.79; OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.10‐1.66; OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.91‐2.94; OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.04‐2.56). And, the EC patients with decreased PNI held a worse OS and CSS compared with those who carried a higher PNI (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.10‐1.50; HR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.15‐5.57). This meta‐analysis demonstrated PNI level was associated with tumor stage and lymph nodes metastases and was an independent prognostic factor in EC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective nonrandomized trial for short-term outcomes

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) significantly extends survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the short-term outcomes for cT4 ESCC remain controversial. Many NAC regimens have been previously reported, although no study has reported a regimen of irinotecan and nedaplatin for cT4 potential resectable ESCC. We evaluated the short-term outcomes of NAC with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable ESCC. A total of 51 patients with cT4 potentially resectable ESCC were eligible for this study. Twenty of these patients underwent NAC, and the other 31 patients underwent surgery alone. The toxicities and response of NAC were evaluated. The clinicopathologic characteristics, responses, toxicities, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and survival time between the two groups were analyzed. No significant differences were found in clinicopathologic characteristics between the groups (P > 0.05). The response rate of NAC was 75% (15/20). The differences in the long-axis diameter of the tumor and cT stage between pre- and post-NAC were significant (P < 0.05). Twenty-four toxic events occurred in 11 patients of the NAC group, and 20/24 of these were mild. The R0 resection rates in the NAC group and the surgery alone group were 85% and 64.5%, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Differences in the pathological T stage and pathological tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage were significant (P < 0.05). The overall survival (OS) time and mortality in the NAC group versus the surgery alone group were 31.57 ± 3.06 months versus 15.24 ± 1.46 months and 25% versus 61.3%, respectively. The differences in OS and mortality were significant (P < 0.05). The NAC group and R0 resection were significant and independent predictors of positive prognosis. NAC with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable ESCC as a new NAC is safe and effective.

Comparative study of dual energy CT iodine imaging and standardized concentrations before and after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Background

To compare dual energy CT iodine imaging and standardized iodine concentration before and after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal cancer and evaluate the efficacy of CRT for EC by examining DECT iodine maps and standard CT values.

Methods

The clinical data of 45 patients confirmed by pathology with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer who underwent concurrent CRT from February 2012 to January 2017 in our department of radiology were collected. All patients underwent dual-source dual-energy CT (DECT) before and after CRT. Normalized iodine concentration (NIC) and normalized CT (NCT) corresponding to the overall cancer lesion and its maximum cross-sectional area were observed and compared. Additionally, 30 healthy individuals were compared as control group. After treatment, the patients were divided into two groups according to RECIST1.1: treatment effective group and ineffective group.

Results

There were 33 patients (CR 9, PR 24) in the effective group and 12 patients (SD 12, PD 0) in the ineffective group. There was no significant difference in the NIC-A, NIC-V, NCT-A and NCT-A indexes between the effective group (B group) and the ineffective group (C group) before treatment (P > 0.05). After the treatment, the above-mentioned indexes in the effective group of patients were significantly lower than before treatment, and compared with the ineffective group, the NIC-A, NIC-V, NCT-A and NCT-V values of the effective group were significantly lower than those of ineffective group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the NIC-V and NCT-V in the ineffective group were lower than before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). However, their NIC-A and NCT-A were not statistically different from those before treatment (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Using DECT iodine map, the changes of NIC and NIC before and after CRT in patients with esophageal cancer can evaluate the effect of CRT, and does not increase the radiation dose, so it is suitable for clinical use.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, nedaplatin, and fluorouracil for resectable esophageal cancer: A phase II study

Cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is regarded as standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan, but the prognosis remains poor. We have previously described how definitive chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DNF) led to a very high response rate and promising survival times. We therefore undertook a phase II trial to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant DNF. The study included patients with clinical stage Ib-III ESCC. Chemotherapy consisted of i.v. docetaxel (30 mg/m2 ) and nedaplatin (50 mg/m2 ) on days 1 and 8, and a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 /day) on days 1-5 and 8-12, every 3 weeks. After three courses of chemotherapy, esophagectomy was carried out. The primary end-point was the completion rate of the protocol treatment. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled (cStage Ib/II/III, 2/3/23) and all received at least two cycles of chemotherapy. Twenty-five patients underwent surgery, all of whom achieved an R0 resection, leading to a completion rate of 89.3%. The overall response rate was 87.0%. A pathological complete response was confirmed in eight (32.0%) cases. Grade 3/4 adverse events included leukopenia (32.1%), neutropenia (39.3%), febrile neutropenia (10.7%), thrombocytopenia (10.7%), and diarrhea (14.3%), but were manageable. Treatment-related deaths and major surgical complications did not occur. Estimated 2-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 70.4% and 77.2%, respectively. Thus, DNF therapy was well tolerated and deemed feasible, with a strong tumor response in a neoadjuvant setting for ESCC. This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN ID: 000014305).

Outcomes of esophagectomy after chemotherapy with biweekly docetaxel plus cisplatin and fluorouracil for advanced esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis

Background

Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy can cause severe adverse events, including neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. The feasibility of DCF therapy is a concern, particularly for elderly patients, patients with moderate organ disorders, and patients suffering from malnutrition caused by dysphagia or insufficient oral intake. We introduced a biweekly DCF therapy (bDCF) for the purpose of reducing severe adverse events for these fragile patients. This study investigated the feasibility and outcome of an esophagectomy after bDCF therapy for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Fifty-nine patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent an esophagectomy after DCF or bDCF therapy as primary chemotherapy. DCF was administered to 37 patients in the DCF group, whereas bDCF was administered to 22 patients in the bDCF group.

Results

Patients in the bDCF group were significantly older than those in the DCF group (p = 0.016). Heart and pulmonary comorbidities were significantly more common in the bDCF than in the DCF group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.039, respectively). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was less frequent in the bDCF than in the DCF group (40.9 vs. 81.1%, p = 0.002). Anorexia was more frequent in the DCF group than in the bDCF group (18.9 vs. 0%, p = 0.030). The clinical response rate of the bDCF group was significantly higher than that of the DCF group (86.4 vs. 62.2%, p = 0.047). There was no significant between-group difference in the postoperative morbidity rate (bDCF 45.5% vs. DCF 32.4%) or in the histological therapeutic effect.

Conclusion

The results demonstrate that primary bDCF therapy for high-risk patients with advanced esophageal cancer is feasible and safe in both chemotherapeutic and perioperative periods without a reduction in the efficacy of DCF therapy.

Prevention of the Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis in Esophageal Cancer by Use of Hangeshashinto (TJ-14)

Objective:

Oral mucositis and diarrhea are adverse effects (AEs) of chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (CR/CRT) that commonly occur in patients of esophageal cancer (EC). We investigated whether Hangeshashinto (TJ-14)—a Japanese traditional medicine—could control oral mucositis, pain, incidence of esophagitis, and diarrhea in patients who underwent CT/CRT for EC.

Methods:

We enrolled 39 patients (36 men, 3 women) who underwent docetaxel- or cisplatin-based CT/CRT for EC between July 2012 and June 2014, of whom 19 used TJ-14 dissolved in water as an oral rinse 3 times a day over the first 2 courses of their treatment, and 20 (the control group) received no particular prophylaxis against mucositis. Their AEs, including mucositis, were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

Results:

Although incidences of oral mucositis, appetite loss, nausea, constipation, and vomiting did not significantly differ between the TJ-14 group and controls, diarrhea incidence was significantly lower in the TJ-14 group by the second treatment course (P = 0.0261 by per protocol set analyses).

Conclusions:

TJ-14 significantly decreases diarrhea caused by CT/CRT in patients treated for EC, although TJ-14 cannot prevent of causing oral mucositis.

Recent advancements in esophageal cancer treatment in Japan

The 11th edition of the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer (EC) was published in 2017. Some correction was made in the depth of tumor invasion to be consistent with the TNM classification by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). With regard to surgery, short-term safety and long-term effectiveness under thoracotomy/video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery are expected to be proven by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG)1409 study. Results of nutritional management and countermeasures for adverse events not only during the perioperative period but also during EC chemotherapy were reported. From now on, the pursuit of low invasiveness and radicality is desired. Esophageal surgery is also expected to be safe at all institutions. To determine the optimal modality of preoperative treatment and a novel chemo(radio)therapy regimen for patients with distant metastasis, the results of the ongoing JCOG1109 and 0807 studies are being released. The effect of the addition of molecular targeted drugs on chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiation has not yet improved overall survival. Immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs could offer a potential new treatment approach for patients with treatment-refractory advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network reported the results of a comprehensive genome analysis and molecular analysis of SCC and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Further differentiation of SCC and adenocarcinoma by molecular characterization analysis may be useful for the development of clinical trials and targeted drug therapies as precision medicine. The era of ultimate minimally invasive surgery and personalized treatment has begun. Large, prospective studies will be required to confirm the value of these advancements.

A 17-molecule set as a predictor of complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in esophageal cancer

Background

Recently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (NAC-DCF) was identified as a novel strong regimen with a high rate of pathological complete response (pCR) in advanced esophageal cancer in Japan. Predicting pCR will contribute to the therapeutic strategy and the prevention of surgical invasion. However, a predictor of pCR after NAC-DCF has not yet been developed. The aim of this study was to identify a novel predictor of pCR in locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with NAC-DCF.

Patients and methods

A total of 32 patients who received NAC-DCF followed by esophagectomy between June 2013 and March 2016 were enrolled in this study. We divided the patients into the following 2 groups: pCR group (9 cases) and non-pCR group (23 cases), and compared gene expressions between these groups using DNA microarray data and KeyMolnet. Subsequently, a validation study of candidate molecular expression was performed in 7 additional cases.

Results

Seventeen molecules, including transcription factor E2F, T-cell-specific transcription factor, Src (known as “proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase of sarcoma”), interferon regulatory factor 1, thymidylate synthase, cyclin B, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4, CDK, caspase-1, vitamin D receptor, histone deacetylase, MAPK/ERK kinase, bcl-2-associated X protein, runt-related transcription factor 1, PR domain zinc finger protein 1, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and interleukin 1, were identified as candidate molecules. The molecules were mainly associated with pathways, such as transcriptional regulation by SMAD, RB/E2F, and STAT. The validation study indicated that 12 of the 17 molecules (71%) matched the trends of molecular expression.

Conclusions

A 17-molecule set that predicts pCR after NAC-DCF for locally advanced esophageal cancer was identified.

The Presence of Serum p53 Antibody Predicts the Pathological Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin and Fluorouracil (DCF) in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) is a candidate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimen for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Although the efficacy and safety of DCF have been reported, the markers that predict the patient's response are still unknown. The aim of this study was to identify the predictive markers for a response to NAC with DCF in patients with ESCC.

METHODS

A total of 79 patients who received preoperative DCF followed by esophagectomy between August 2008 and December 2014 were enrolled in this study. All of the patients completed 2 preoperative courses of DCF. The clinical and pathological responses to DCF were investigated, and the associations between the pathological response, the clinicopathological factors and the prognosis were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 79 patients, the pathological response to DCF (evaluated according to the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer) was grade 3 (complete pathological response) in 7 patients (8.9 %), grade 2 in 13 patients (16.5 %), grade 1b in 8 patients (10.1 %) and grade 1a in 51 patients (64.6 %). A good pathological response (grade 2-3) was significantly associated with both favorable disease-free survival (P = 0.0051) and favorable cancer-specific survival (P = 0.0366). A multivariate analysis revealed that a good clinical response (HR 13.743, 95 % CI 2.455-76.917) and the presence of serum p53 antibody before treatment (HR 3.987, 95 % CI 1.103-14.416) were independent predictors of good pathological response.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of serum p53 antibody can be used as a novel, noninvasive predictor of the pathological tumor response to NAC with DCF in ESCC patients.

Failure of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Neoadjuvant treatment has become standard care for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. However, some patients cannot undergo surgery or curative resection because of disease progression during neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of this study is to identify the pretreatment characteristics of patients in whom neoadjuvant treatment failed. The study enrolled 231 patients who underwent chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) as neoadjuvant therapy for T1N1-3 or T2-3 any-N esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Of these patients, 201 (87.0%) underwent curative resection (R0) and 30 (13.0%) could not undergo curative resection; 19 patients (8.2%) underwent incomplete resection (R1 or R2), and 11 patients (4.8%) could not undergo surgery because of disease progression. We compared clinical characteristics and survival between patients who underwent curative resection (curative group) and those who could not undergo curative resection (noncurative group) to determine the factors predicting noncurative treatment. The noncurative group had significantly worse disease-specific survival than the curative group (P < 0.001). All patients in the noncurative group had cT3 tumors. In 141 patients with cT3 tumors, those in the noncurative group were more likely to have higher serum SCC antigen concentration (P = 0.021), location of the main tumor in the upper to the middle third of the esophagus (P = 0.071), intramural metastases (P < 0.001), advanced N category (P = 0.016), and bulky lymph node metastases (P = 0.060). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified location of the main tumor in the upper to the middle third of the esophagus (P = 0.047), intramural metastases (P = 0.002), and nodal metastases (N1, P = 0.014; N2, P = 0.015, respectively) as independent predictors of treatment failure in patients with cT3 tumors. Neoadjuvant CF therapy alone may not be effective for patients with cT3 tumors accompanied by these risk factors, and the efficacy of alternative strategies, such as triplet chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, should be evaluated.

Prognostic significance of the prognostic nutritional index in esophageal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Nutritional status is one of the most important issues faced by cancer patients. Several studies have shown that a low preoperative nutritional status is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with various types of cancer, including esophageal cancer (EC). Recently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and/or radiotherapy have been accepted as the standard treatment for resectable advanced EC. However, NAC has the potential to deteriorate the nutritional status of a patient. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the nutritional status for EC patients who underwent NAC. We retrospectively reviewed 66 squamous cell EC patients who underwent NAC consisting of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by subtotal esophagectomy at Nara Medical University Hospital between January 2009 and August 2015. To assess the patients' nutritional status, the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) before commencing NAC and prior to the operation was calculated as 10 × serum albumin (g/dl) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count in the peripheral blood (per mm3). The cutoff value of the PNI was set at 45. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The mean pre-NAC and preoperative PNI were 50.2 ± 5.7 and 48.1 ± 4.7, respectively (P = 0.005). The PNI decreased following NAC in 44 (66.7%) patients. Before initiating NAC, 9 (13.6%) patients had a low PNI, and 12 (18.2%) patients had a low PNI prior to the operation. The pre-NAC PNI and preoperative PNI were significantly associated with the OS (P = 0.013 and P = 0.004, respectively) and RFS (P = 0.036 and P = 0.005, respectively) rates. The multivariable analysis identified the preoperative PNI as an independent prognostic factor for poor OS and RFS, although the pre-NAC PNI was not an independent predictor. Our results suggest that the preoperative PNI is a useful marker for predicting the long-term outcomes of EC patients undergoing NAC and subsequent subtotal esophagectomy. Therefore, patients with a low preoperative nutritional status may be at a higher risk of EC recurrence.

Investigation of operative outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy after triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) has become the standard treatment for resectable stage II/III thoracic esophageal carcinoma in Japan. Recently, preoperative triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) has been reported to be effective for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) has been increasingly accepted worldwide for the treatment of esophageal cancer. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and outcomes of TE after DCF therapy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The medical records of 63 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent thoracoscopic surgery after chemotherapy were reviewed. Thirty-four patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CF, and 29 received DCF as first-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The clinical T stage was significantly higher in the DCF group than in the CF group (p < 0.0001), including 17 patients with T4. Lymph node metastasis was more frequent in the DCF group (p = 0.0005), and the clinical stage of the tumor was significantly higher in the DCF group than in the CF group (p = 0.0001). No significant difference existed between the two groups in operation time for the thoracic procedure (DCF 277.2 min vs. CF 302 min). Blood loss during the thoracic procedure was less in the DCF group than in the CF group (DCF 46.9 mL vs. CF 88.8 mL; p = 0.0056). No significant differences existed between the two groups in postoperative morbidity (DCF 34.5% vs. CF 47%) or mortality (DCF 0% vs. CF 2.9%) rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that TE after DCF therapy for advanced esophageal cancer is as safe as TE after CF therapy.

Stability of cervical esophagogastrostomy via hand-sewn anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the outcome of hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis during radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The outcomes of 467 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent cervical esophagogastric anastomosis using interrupted and double-layered sutures after radical esophagectomy via right thoracotomy or thoracoscopic surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Anastomotic leakage, including conduit necrosis, occurred in 11 of 467 patients (2.4%); 7 of 11 (63.6%) cases experienced only minor leakage, whereas the other four (36.4%) patients had major leakage that required surgical or radiologic intervention, including two patients of conduit necrosis. Anastomotic leakages were more frequently observed after retrosternal reconstruction compared with the posterior mediastinal route (P < 0.0001). The median time to healing of leakage was 40 days (range: 14-97 days). Two patients (2/467, 0.4%) died in the hospital due to sepsis caused by the leakage and conduit necrosis. Twelve patients (2.6%) developed anastomotic stenosis, which was improved by dilatation in all patients. Hand-sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is a stable and highly safe method of radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is less controlled at delayed phase in patients with esophageal cancer: a prospective registration study by the CINV Study Group of Japan

Chemotherapy is an indispensable therapeutic approach for esophageal cancer. Although chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most crucial adverse events, the current state of CINV in patients with esophageal cancer remains unclear. This multicenter prospective observational study analyzed data for 192 patents with esophageal cancer who underwent moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). The patients recorded their CINV incidence and severity daily for 7 days after receiving chemotherapy, using visual analog scales (VAS). Of the 192 patients, 181 received HEC including cisplatin, and 11 patients received MEC including nedaplatin. Approximately 81% of HEC and 82% of MEC patients received antiemetic therapy in compliance with guidelines. Although CINV was controlled relatively well in the early phase (days 1-4), it was not fully controlled in late phase (days 5-7) for both the HEC and MEC groups. Female sex was a major risk factor for delayed vomiting (P=0.034). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for VAS revealed that motion sickness, age, and use of other antiemetics were risk factors for delayed nausea. Adherence to antiemetic guidelines effectively controls vomiting but is less effective against delayed CINV in both HEC and MEC patients. Identification of individual risk factors, such as female sex, will help develop personalized treatments for CINV. In the clinical setting for esophageal cancer, regimens that include nedaplatin might need to be treated as HEC.

Current Status and Future Prospects for Esophageal Cancer Treatment

The local control effect of esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection (3FLD) is reaching its limit pending technical advancement. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) by thoracotomy is slowly gaining acceptance due to advantages in short-term outcomes. Although the evidence is slowly increasing, MIE is still controversial. Also, the results of treatment by surgery alone are limiting, and multimodality therapy, which includes surgical and non-surgical treatment options including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and endoscopic treatment, has become the mainstream therapy. Esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard treatment for clinical stages II/III (except for T4) esophageal cancer, whereas chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is regarded as the standard treatment for patients who wish to preserve their esophagus, those who refuse surgery, and those with inoperable disease. CRT is also usually selected for clinical stage IV esophageal cancer. On the other hand, with the spread of CRT, salvage esophagectomy has traditionally been recognized as a feasible option; however, many clinicians oppose the use of surgery due to the associated unfavorable morbidity and mortality profile. In the future, the improvement of each treatment result and the establishment of individual strategies are important although esophageal cancer has many treatment options.

Positive esophageal proximal resection margin: an important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer that warrants adjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Positive esophageal proximal resection margin (ERM+) following esophagectomy was considered as incomplete or R1 resection. The clinicopathological data and long-term prognosis of esophageal cancer (EC) patients with ERM+ after esophagectomy were still unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of ERM+ and its therapeutic option.

METHODS

From November 2008 to December 2014, 3,594 patients with histologically confirmed EC underwent radical resection in our department. Among them there were 37 patients (1.03%) who had ERM+. ERM+ was defined as carcinoma or atypical hyperplasia (severe or moderate) at the residual esophageal margin in our study. For comparison, another 74 patients with negative esophageal proximal resection margin (ERM-) were propensity-matched at a ratio of 1:2 as control group according to sex, age, tumor location and TNM staging. The relevant prognostic factors were investigated by univariate and multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

In this large cohort of patients, the rate of ERM+ was 1.03%. The median survival time was 35.000 months in patients with ERM+, significantly worse than 68.000 months in those with ERM- (Chi-square =4.064, P=0.044). Survival in patients with esophageal residual atypical hyperplasia (severe or moderate) was similar to those with esophageal residual carcinoma. Survival rate in stage I-II was higher than that in stage III-IV (Chi-square =27.598, P=0.000) in ERM-; But there was no difference between the two subgroups of patients in ERM+. Furthermore, in those patients with ERM+, survival was better in those who having adjuvant therapy, compared to those without adjuvant therapy (Chi-square =5.480, P=0.019). And the average survival time which was improved to a well situation for ERM+ patients who have adjuvant therapy was 68.556 months which is comparable to average survival time (65.815 months) of ERM- for those patients who are at earlier stages.

CONCLUSIONS

ERM+ after esophagectomy nowadays is of low incidence but still an important prognostic factor for patients with EC. Survival of ERM+ patients who have adjuvant therapy was improved to a well situation which is comparable to overall survival (OS) rate of ERM- for those patients who are at earlier stages.

Tumor/normal esophagus ratio in (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for response and prognosis stratification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography (PET) response criteria in solid tumors were recently proposed as a standardized method for the metabolic and quantitative assessment of response to chemotherapy. However, use of these criteria is limited in many institutions because of the need for exclusive software. This study was designed to clarify whether tumor to normal esophageal (T/N) ratio on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography could predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stratify prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Clinicopathological data were collected for 73 patients with ESCC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by curative resection. The right liver lobe and normal esophagus were utilized as reference tissues for diagnosing complete metabolic response (CMR). Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.

RESULTS

CMR was achieved in 24 patients on the basis of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and in 11 on the basis of SUVmax evaluation with T/N ratio. Although prognosis was poorer in patients who achieved CMR than partial metabolic response based on SUVmax, the responses were significantly correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) based on SUVmax evaluation with T/N ratio (P = 0.0011). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that SUVmax evaluation with T/N ratio was the best predictor of pGrade 3. Multivariate analysis showed that SUVmax evaluation with T/N ratio was an independent predictor of DFS in patients with pGrade 1 pathologic response.

CONCLUSIONS

SUVmax evaluation with T/N ratio is useful for evaluating the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ESCC.

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, nedaplatin, and S1 for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Although standard chemotherapy for esophageal cancer patients is fluorouracil and cisplatin, the prognosis is still unsatisfactory. A new therapeutic regimen combining docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5‐fluorouracil was recently developed to improve both local and distant tumor control. We developed a new regimen of docetaxel, nedaplatin, and S1 (DGS) and previously reported the recommended dose in a phase I dose‐escalation study. We then undertook a phase II study of DGS for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with clinical stage IB/II/III disease were eligible. Patients received two courses of chemotherapy: docetaxel 35 mg/m² with nedaplatin 40 mg/m² on day 8, 80 mg/m² S1 on days 1–14, and 2 weeks off. After completion of chemotherapy, patients underwent esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of protocol treatment (completion of two courses of preoperative chemotherapy and R0 surgery [no residual tumor]). We enrolled 32 patients. The completion rate of protocol treatment was 96.9%. During chemotherapy, the most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (25.0%). No treatment‐related deaths were observed, and the incidence of operative morbidity was tolerable. The overall response rate after chemotherapy was 83.3%. This DGS regimen was well tolerated and highly active. This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN ID: 000014626).

Expression of BRCA1, a factor closely associated with relapse-free survival, in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify the biomarkers associated with chemotherapeutic efficacy and long-term survival for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (NAC-DCF).

METHODS

This study included 45 patients with advanced SCCE who received NAC-DCF between 2008 and 2012. The NAC-DCF was conducted as a phase II study (UMIN000007408). The expressions of excision repair cross-complementing-1 (ERCC1), class III beta-tubulin, breast cancer susceptibility gene I (BRCA1), and thymidylate synthase were investigated simultaneously in the pre-treatment endoscopic tumor biopsy samples.

RESULTS

A multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that pathological responses were significantly associated with tumors with low ERCC1 expression (P = 0.016) and with tumors with high BRCA1 expression (P = 0.030). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analysis for relapse-free survival revealed high BRCA1 expression (P = 0.031, hazards ratio 4.39) as the factor associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Low ERCC1 expression and high BRCA1 expression in patients with SCCE were associative biomarkers for chemotherapeutic efficacy. High BRCA1 expression was considered the factor associated with survival. These findings may be helpful for tailoring chemotherapy.

Phase II trial of biweekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The prognosis of esophageal cancer patients is still unsatisfactory. Although a docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-Fu (DCF) regimen has been reported, it is often difficult to accomplish because of severe toxicity. Therefore, we developed a new biweekly DCF (Bi-DCF) regimen and previously reported the recommended dose in a phase I dose-escalation study. We then performed a phase II study of Bi-DCF for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Patients with clinical stage II/III were eligible. Patients received 2 courses of chemotherapy: docetaxel 35 mg/m² with cisplatin 40 mg/m² on days 1 and 15 and 400 mg/m² 5-fluorouracil on days 1–5 and 15–19 every 4 weeks. After completion of the chemotherapy, patients received esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of protocol treatment. Thirty-two patients were enrolled. The completion rate of protocol treatment (completion of two courses of preoperative chemotherapy and R0 surgery) was 100 %. During chemotherapy, the most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (31.3 %). No treatment-related death was observed, and the incidence of operative morbidity was tolerable. The overall response rate after the chemotherapy was 90.3 %. This Bi-DCF regimen was well tolerated and highly active. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (No. UMIN 000014625).

Successfully treated advanced esophageal cancer with left axillary lymph node metastasis and synchronous right breast cancer: a case report

The incidence of double cancer of the esophagus and breast is rare, and axillary lymph node metastasis (ALM) in esophageal cancer is also very rare. We report a case of advanced esophageal cancer with left ALM and synchronous right breast cancer. A 64-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with dysphagia. The clinical diagnosis was esophageal cancer (T3N0M1 stage IV) and right breast cancer (T1cN0M0 stage I). She was initially treated with triple chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil. The primary lesion in the esophagus achieved almost complete response as assessed by esophageal endoscopy. A computed tomography scan showed that the left ALM reduced in size and that stable disease was achieved for the right breast cancer. She underwent partial mastectomy of the right breast and bilateral axillary lymph node dissection. The histopathological diagnosis of the breast cancer was T1cN1M0 stage IIA. The lymph nodes from the left axilla contained metastatic cells from the squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Complete response was achieved for the primary lesion in the esophagus following chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and the patient has been relapse free 2 years after treatment. Thus, we report the successful treatment of synchronous double cancers of the esophagus with left ALM and right breast by combination therapy with chemotherapy, CRT, and surgery.