1
|
Wei G, Harley F, O’Callaghan M, Adshead J, Hennessey D, Kinnear N. Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 2023; 34:371-389. [PMID: 36251061 PMCID: PMC9870963 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05339-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS We aim to review iatrogenic bladder and ureteric injuries sustained during caesarean section and hysterectomy. METHODS A search of Cochrane, Embase, Medline and grey literature was performed using methods pre-published on PROSPERO. Eligible studies described iatrogenic bladder or ureter injury rates during caesarean section or hysterectomy. The 15 largest studies were included for each procedure sub-type and meta-analyses performed. The primary outcome was injury incidence. Secondary outcomes were risk factors and preventative measures. RESULTS Ninety-six eligible studies were identified, representing 1,741,894 women. Amongst women undergoing caesarean section, weighted pooled rates of bladder or ureteric injury per 100,000 procedures were 267 or 9 events respectively. Injury rates during hysterectomy varied by approach and pathological condition. Weighted pooled mean rates for bladder injury were 212-997 events per 100,000 procedures for all approaches (open, vaginal, laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and robot assisted) and all pathological conditions (benign, malignant, any), except for open peripartum hysterectomy (6,279 events) and laparoscopic hysterectomy for malignancy (1,553 events). Similarly, weighted pooled mean rates for ureteric injury were 9-577 events per 100,000 procedures for all hysterectomy approaches and pathologies, except for open peripartum hysterectomy (666 events) and laparoscopic hysterectomy for malignancy (814 events). Surgeon inexperience was the prime risk factor for injury, and improved anatomical knowledge the leading preventative strategy. CONCLUSIONS Caesarean section and most types of hysterectomy carry low rates of urological injury. Obstetricians and gynaecologists should counsel the patient for her individual risk of injury, prospectively establish risk factors and implement preventative strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin Wei
- grid.410678.c0000 0000 9374 3516Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Frances Harley
- grid.417072.70000 0004 0645 2884Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael O’Callaghan
- grid.1010.00000 0004 1936 7304Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia ,grid.414925.f0000 0000 9685 0624Urology Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, Australia ,grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - James Adshead
- grid.415953.f0000 0004 0400 1537Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Derek Hennessey
- grid.411785.e0000 0004 0575 9497Department of Urology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Ned Kinnear
- grid.410678.c0000 0000 9374 3516Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia ,grid.1010.00000 0004 1936 7304Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gao J, Dang J, Chu J, Liu X, Wang J, You J, Jin Z. A Comparative Analysis of Robotic Single-Site Surgery and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery as Therapeutic Options for Stage IB1 Cervical Squamous Carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:3485-3492. [PMID: 33911898 PMCID: PMC8071700 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s299827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare perioperative outcomes between robotic single-site surgical technique and conventional laparoendoscopic single-site surgical technique. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study involving 67 patients who received robotic single-site surgery or laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the treatment of stage IB1 cervical squamous carcinoma. The robotic single-site radical hysterectomy technique combined with pelvic lymph node dissections were performed in 32 patients while the laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy technique combined with pelvic lymph node dissections were performed in 35 patients. Results The enrolled patients had been diagnosed with stage IB1 cervical squamous carcinoma. The perioperative outcomes were mean age (51.63±8.32 years in the lymph node dissection (RSS group) and 53.14±8.14 years in the lymph node dissection (LESS group), p=0.453); BMIs (23.76±2.72 in the RSS group and 23.46±2.28 in the LESS group, p=0.629); shorter operative times (223.56±15.43 min in the RSS group and 248.61±20.89 min in the LESS group, p<0.01) and less estimated blood loss (217.25±16.77 mL in the RSS group and 294.74±24.00 mL in the LESS group, p<0.01). None of the study participants exhibited postoperative pain. There were no statistically significant differences in the length of hospital stay (p=0.865), perioperative complications (p=0.602), duration of closure and removal of catheter (p=0.518) as well as in pathological diagnoses between the two groups. Conclusion Robotic single-site surgery can be used in the treatment of early stage cervical cancer as it exhibits acceptable operative times and perioperative outcomes. This surgical technique is feasible and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinghai Gao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai ChangZheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianhong Dang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai ChangZheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Chu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai ChangZheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaojun Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai ChangZheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai ChangZheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiahao You
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai ChangZheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhijun Jin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai ChangZheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang W, Li L, Wu M, Ma S, Tan X, Zhong S. Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1331. [PMID: 31828044 PMCID: PMC6890871 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
This study is to compare the survival outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) to those of abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB2 to IIB LACC who underwent radical hysterectomy between 2001 and 2015 were identified. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared according to the surgical approach and were adjusted based on clinicopathologic characteristics. A total of 396 patients were included in the study, with 179 (45.2%) and 217 (54.8%) patients in the ARH and LRH groups, respectively. The LRH group showed a significantly lower amount of estimated blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate and shorter length of hospital stay. Overall, there were no significant differences in the 5-year DFS and 5-year OS between the LRH and ARH groups with the Kaplan-Meier method. However, multivariate analyses identified LRH as an independent prognostic factor for a poor DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.19 to 0.87; p = 0.02). The analysis of stage IB2 disease and the squamous subtype (61.9% and 87.9% of all participants, respectively) reached the same conclusion. When stratifying by FIGO stage, the patients with IB2 (n = 348) in the ARH group had a significantly better DFS (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05–0.42, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.67, p = 0.11) than those in the LRH group in the Cox regression model. However, no differences were found in patient with stage IIA1, IIA2, or IIB in Cox regression model. When stratifying by histological types, for the patients with squamous carcinomas (n = 375), in Cox model, ARH had a significantly superior DFS compared with those who underwent LRH (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25–0.82, p = 0.01), but the OS was not statistically significant (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.27–1.20, p = 0.14). However, no differences were found in patient with adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinomas in the Cox model. Therefore, ARH was associated with a higher DFS than LRH in patients with LACC, especially in patients with stage IB2 disease or the squamous subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhui Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shuiqing Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xianjie Tan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Sen Zhong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ding D, Jiang H, Nie J, Liu X, Guo SW. Concurrent Learning Curves of 3-Dimensional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy as a Benchmark: A Single Surgeon's Experience. Med Sci Monit 2019; 25:5903-5919. [PMID: 31392971 PMCID: PMC6698092 DOI: 10.12659/msm.914952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For early-stage cervical cancers, radical hysterectomy (RH) with pelvic lymphadenectomy has been the standard care. This study compared the learning curves and intra-, peri-, and post-operative outcomes for 3-dimensional laparoscopic RH (3D-LRH) and robotic-assisted (RA)-LRH by a surgeon highly skilled in 2-dimensional (2D)-LRH for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Material/Methods Two hundred and thirty-nine patients with early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO stage: Ia2–IIa2) admitted to Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University were recruited into this prospective study: 54, 85, and 100 patients underwent 2D-, 3D-, and RA-LRH, respectively and were followed up. Patients’ demographic, clinical, and operative information was retrieved and compared. CUSUM (cumulative summation) analysis using a benchmark derived from previously performed 2D-LRHs. Results Both 3D- and RA-LRH had a steep learning curve. 3D-LRH was superior to 2D- and RA-LRH in terms of significantly shorter operating time. For all approaches, the operating time was associated with the uterus size of the patient and was not affected by other parameters. All approaches of LRH yielded comparable radicality and operative results other than operative time. Conclusions Both 3D- and RA-LRH approaches had similar radicality, and intra-operative and post-operative complication rates, however, 3D-LRH had the shortest operating time and lowest amount of blood loss. After reaching proficiency, RA-LRH had comparable operating time with that of 2D-LRH, and might be even shorter in cases where surgeon has acquired more experience. In countries where labor costs are low; 3D-LRH might be preferable to 2D- and RA-LRH for early-stage cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ding Ding
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland)
| | - Hongyuan Jiang
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland)
| | - Jichan Nie
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland)
| | - Xishi Liu
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine-Related Diseases, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland)
| | - Sun-Wei Guo
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine-Related Diseases, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu Y, Li L, Wu M, Ma S, Tan X, Zhong S, Lang J. The impact of the surgical routes and learning curve of radical hysterectomy on the survival outcomes in stage IB cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2019; 68:72-77. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
6
|
Lee B, Kim K, Park Y, Lim MC, Bristow RE. Impact of hospital care volume on clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e13445. [PMID: 30544427 PMCID: PMC6310549 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000013445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In cervical cancer, the impact of hospital volume of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) has not been investigated systematically as in ovarian cancer.The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of hospital care volume of LRH on treatment outcomes of patients with cervical cancer. METHODS The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched with the terms "cervical cancer," "radical hysterectomy," and "laparoscopy." The selection criteria included studies presenting operative outcomes and/or perioperative complications of LRH from high-volume hospitals (HVHs) (≥15 cases/year) and low-volume hospitals (LVHs) (<15 cases/year). Fifty-nine studies including 4367 cases were selected. Linear regression analysis weighted by the average annual case number in each study was performed to evaluate differences between the groups. RESULTS In HVH, a higher number of lymph nodes (24.5 vs 21.1; P = .037) were retrieved by LRH in older women (48.4 vs 44.5 years; P = .010) with tendencies of shorter operation time (224.4 vs 256.4 minutes; P = .096) and less blood loss (253.1 vs 322.2 mL; P = .080). Compared with LVH, HVH had fewer patients with stage IA disease (13.8 vs 24.4%; P = .003) and more patients with stage IIA disease (15.3 vs 7.1%; P = .052) with comparable 5-year overall survival (93.1 vs 88.6%; P = .112). CONCLUSION HVH is a prognostic factor for operative outcome and perioperative complications in patients with cervical cancer undergoing LRH. The exact effect of hospital volume on survival outcome needs to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Banghyun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Kidong Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Gyeonggi-do
| | - Youngmi Park
- Division of Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-Si
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Cancer Healthcare Research Branch, Center for Uterine Cancer, and Center for Clinical Trials, Research Institute and Hospital, Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Robert E. Bristow
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Irvine Medical Center, University of California, Orange, CA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Park JY, Nam JH. Role of robotic surgery in cervical malignancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 45:60-73. [PMID: 28533153 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Revised: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Surgical treatment is the mainstay of the management of early-stage cervical cancer. Abdominal radical hysterectomy and trachelectomy have long been the standard surgical approach to early-stage cervical cancer, achieving excellent survival outcomes. Recently, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and trachelectomy have become the preferred alternative to abdominal surgery because laparoscopic approaches lead to better surgical outcomes without compromising survival outcomes. Since the robotic surgery platform was approved for the use of gynaecologic surgery in 2005, robotic radical hysterectomy and trachelectomy have been increasingly used in the surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer. However, the role of robotic surgery is poorly defined. This review examines the role of robotic surgery in the surgical management of cervical cancer by comparing the published data on its use with those of abdominal and laparoscopic surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong-Yeol Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo-Hyun Nam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shim SH, Kim DY, Lee SJ, Kim SN, Kang SB, Lee SW, Park JY, Suh DS, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Prediction model for para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 144:40-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2016] [Revised: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 11/05/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
9
|
Vásquez-Ciriaco S, Isla-Ortiz D, Palomeque-Lopez A, García-Espinoza JA, Jarquín-Arremilla A, Lechuga-García NA. [Initial experience in the laparoscopic treatment of benign and malignant gynaecological diseases in the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad in Oaxaca]. CIR CIR 2016; 85:12-20. [PMID: 27320647 DOI: 10.1016/j.circir.2016.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The history of laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological diseases progressed with the advances of Semm, as well as with the development of tools, equipment, and energy that led to its development in all surgical areas, including oncology. OBJECTIVE To present the initial experience in the laparoscopic treatment of benign and malignant gynaecological disease in the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad in Oaxaca. MATERIAL AND METHODS An analysis was performed on a total of 44 cases, distributed into: type III radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer, hysterectomy type I cervical cancer in situ, extrafascial hysterectomy for benign disease, routine endometrium, ovary and routine salpingo-oophorectomy. The variables included age, BMI, surgical time, bleeding, intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion, hospital stay, and pathology report. RESULTS Hysterectomy type III; age 40.2 years, BMI 25.8kg/m2, 238ml bleeding, operative time 228min, 2.6-day hospital stay, intraoperative or postoperative complications, tumour size 1.1cm, 14 lymph nodes dissected, vaginal and negative parametrical edge. Type I hysterectomy cervical cancer in situ: 51 years, BMI 23.8kg/m2, 80ml bleeding, operative time 127minutes, uterus of 9cm, length of stay of 2 days, a conversion by external iliac artery injury, with bleeding of 1500ml. Routine endometrium: 50.3 years, BMI 30.3kg/m2, 83ml bleeding, operative time 180minutes, uterus 12.6cm, length of stay 2.3 days, no complications. CONCLUSION The management of benign and malignant pelvic diseases using laparoscopy is feasible and safe, with shorter hospital stays and a prompt recovery to daily activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Vásquez-Ciriaco
- Servicio de Oncología Quirúrgica, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Oaxaca, Oaxaca, México
| | - David Isla-Ortiz
- Servicio de Ginecología Oncológica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México, México
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Park JY, Ngan HYS, Park W, Cao Z, Wu X, Ju W, Chung HH, Chang SJ, Park SY, Ryu SY, Kim JH, Cho CH, Lee KH, Lee JW, Kumarasamy S, Kim JW, Wilailak S, Kim BG, Kim DY, Konishi I, Lee JK, Wang KL, Nam JH. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology International Workshop 2014. J Gynecol Oncol 2015; 26:68-74. [PMID: 25609163 PMCID: PMC4302288 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.68] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology International Workshop 2014 on gynecologic oncology was held in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea on the 23rd to 24th August 2014. A total of 179 participants from 17 countries participated in the workshop, and the up-to-date findings on the management of gynecologic cancers were presented and discussed. This meeting focused on the new trends in the management of cervical cancer, fertility-sparing management of gynecologic cancers, surgical management of gynecologic cancers, and recent advances in translational research on gynecologic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Yeol Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hextan Yuen Sheung Ngan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Won Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Zeyi Cao
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Center, Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohua Wu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Woong Ju
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Hoon Chung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk Joon Chang
- Gynecologic Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Sang Yoon Park
- Center for Uterine Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang Young Ryu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chi Heum Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Keun Ho Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Won Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Jae Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sarikapan Wilailak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University Faculty of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Byoung Gie Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dae Yeon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ikuo Konishi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Jae Kwan Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kung Liahng Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Nursing, Mackay Junior College of Medicine Nursing, and Management, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Joo Hyun Nam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Corrado G, Fanfani F, Ghezzi F, Fagotti A, Uccella S, Mancini E, Sperduti I, Stevenazzi G, Scambia G, Vizza E. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 41:136-41. [PMID: 25468748 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.10.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2014] [Revised: 09/24/2014] [Accepted: 10/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to verify possible differences in terms of perioperative outcomes and complications between mini-laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy (mLRH) and robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy (RRH) in patients with early cervical cancer (ECC). MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective study, thirty women with early stage cervical cancer who underwent mini-laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus lymphadenectomy (mLRH) were compared with a cohort of thirty women who underwent robotic multiport radical hysterectomy (RRH). The study involved patients, between August 2010 and December 2012, from three Italian institutions: National Cancer Institute of Rome, University of Insubria, Varese, and the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome. RESULTS No significant differences between groups were observed in terms of age, BMI, previous abdominal surgery or FIGO stage. Operative time, blood loss, need of blood transfusion, risk of intra- and post-operative complications, and lymph nodes yield were similar between mLRH and RRH in patients with ECC. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days in the mLRH group and 3 days in the RRH group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The few differences we registered do not seem clinically relevant, thus making the two procedures comparable. The decision on how to gain best access for radical hysterectomy considers the surgeon's skill and experience with the different possible approaches. Further randomized trials are needed to determine whether mini-laparoscopic techniques truly offer any advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Corrado
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Gynecologic Oncologic Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
| | - F Fanfani
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - F Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - A Fagotti
- Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecological Surgery, St. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - S Uccella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - E Mancini
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Gynecologic Oncologic Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - I Sperduti
- Unit of Biostatistics, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - G Stevenazzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - E Vizza
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Gynecologic Oncologic Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|