Clinical significance of surgical resection for the recurrence of esophageal cancer after radical esophagectomy

Endoscopic ultrasound for structured surveillance after curative treatment of esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Structured surveillance after treatment of esophageal cancer is not established. Due to a paucity of data, no agreement exists on how surveillance should be performed. The main argument against intensive follow-up in esophageal cancer is that it may not lead to true survival advantage.

METHODS

Structured surveillance was performed in 42 patients after multimodal therapy with peri-operative chemotherapy (29) or definitive chemoradiotherapy (13) of esophageal cancer. The surveillance protocol included gastroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasound, and CEA measurement at regular intervals of up to five years. We analyzed relapse rate, time to relapse, localization of recurrence, diagnosis within or without structured surveillance, diagnostic method providing the first evidence of a relapse, treatment of recurrence, and outcome.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 48 months; 18/42 patients suffered from tumor relapse, with 16 asymptomatic patients diagnosed within structured surveillance. Median time to recurrence was 9 months. Isolated local or locoregional recurrence occurred in 6, and isolated distant relapse in 9 patients. All patients with isolated locoregional recurrence were exclusively diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound. Six patients received curatively intended therapy with surgery or chemoradiation, leading to long-lasting survival.

CONCLUSION

Structured surveillance offers the chance to identify limited and asymptomatic tumor relapse. Especially in cases of locoregional recurrence, long-lasting survival or even a cure can be achieved. Endoscopic ultrasound is the best method for the detection of locoregional tumor recurrence and should be an integral part of structured surveillance after curative treatment of esophageal cancer.

Treatment of Oligometastatic GI Cancers

Oligometastatic state is believed to potentially represent a transitional stage between early, locoregional state disease and widely metastatic disease. Historically, locoregional approaches, particularly in advanced colorectal cancers, have demonstrated efficacy in select patients with limited burden of metastatic disease. Recent strides in systemic therapies, including biomarker-based treatments and immunotherapy, alongside innovations in surgical techniques and novel locoregional approaches such as stereotactic radiotherapy and ablation, have ushered in a new era of therapeutic possibilities across all oligometastatic GI cancers. Despite these advancements, there remains a significant gap in high-quality prospective evidence guiding patient selection and treatment decisions across various disease types. Ongoing clinical trials are anticipated to provide crucial insights into oligometastatic states, fostering the refinement of disease-specific oligometastatic state definitions and treatment algorithms. This article reviews existing data on the management of oligometastatic GI cancer, summarizes current state of knowledge for each disease state, and provides updates on ongoing studies in this space.

Survival outcomes of esophageal cancer patients with recurrence after curative treatments

BACKGROUND

Little is known about predictive factors for survival outcomes of esophageal carcinoma (EC) patients who developed recurrence after undergoing multimodal therapies. We aimed to investigate long-term outcomes and identify prognostic factors in patients with relapsed EC, focusing especially on those with oligometastasis (OM).

METHODS

EC patients who developed recurrence after curative treatments (radical esophagectomy or definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT)) between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. Multivariate Cox hazards models were applied to determine independent predictors of poor post-recurrence survival (PRS).

RESULTS

In total, 178 patients were included. The median PRS was 12.9 months. Of the 178 patients, 98 had OM and 80 non-OM (NOM) disease. The survival outcomes of patients with OM were significantly better than those of patients with NOM (P < 0.01). Surgical treatments provided significantly better survival outcomes than CRT or chemo-/radiotherapy alone (3-year overall survival (OS); 78.1% vs. 42.5% vs. 28.9%, P < 0.01), mainly due to prolonging survival after the recurrence (3-year PRS 62.9% vs. 16.7% vs. 16.2%, P < 0.01). Multivariable analysis focusing on patients with OM revealed cStage III-IV disease (P < 0.01), high GPS at the time of recurrence (P = 0.02) and non-curative treatments (P < 0.01), to be independently associated with poor PRS. In contrast, in patients with NOM, no independent predictors for poor PRS were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival outcomes of patients with relapsed EC remain poor. Surgical treatments could provide survival benefits for patients with recurrent EC, especially for patients with OM.

Prediction of pulmonary metastasis in esophageal carcinoma patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules

BACKGROUND

Indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) are common after surgery for esophageal cancer. The paucity of data on postoperative IPNs for esophageal cancer causes a clinical dilemma.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics and clinical significance of IPNs after radical esophagectomy for metastatic esophageal cancer, determine the risk factors for pulmonary metastasis, and construct a risk score model to standardize the appropriate time to either follow up or treat the patient.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent radical surgery between 2013 and 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors and develop risk score models.

RESULTS

A total of 816 patients were enrolled in the study. During a median follow-up period of 45 months, IPNs were detected in 221 (27.1%) patients, of whom 66 (29.9%) were diagnosed with pulmonary metastases. The following five variables maintained prognostic significance after multivariate analyses: the pathologic N category, number of IPNs, shape of IPNs, time of detection of IPNs, and size of IPNs. The Pulmonary Metastasis Prediction Model (PMPM) scale ranges from 0 to 15 points, and patients with higher scores have a higher probability of pulmonary metastases. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a good calibration performance of the clinical prediction model (χ2 = 8.573, P = 0.380). After validation, the PMPM scale showed good discrimination with an AUC of 0.939.

CONCLUSION

A PMPM scale for IPNs in patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC may be clinically useful for diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making.

Surveillance Strategy after Curative Resection for Oesophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Using the Hazard Function

Background

The optimal surveillance period and frequency after curative resection for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remain unclear, and current guidelines are mainly based on traditional Kaplan–Meier analyses of cumulative incidence rather than risk analysis. The aim of this study was to determine a suitable follow-up surveillance program following oesophagectomy for OSCC using the hazard function.

Methods

A total of 1187 patients who underwent curative resection for OSCC between 2000 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The changes in the estimated hazard rates (HRs) of recurrence over time were analyzed according to tumour-node-metastasis stage.

Results

Four hundred seventy-eight (40.2%) patients experienced recurrence during the follow-up period (median, 116.5 months). The risk of recurrence peaked at 9.2 months after treatment (HR = 0.0219) and then decreased to half the peak value at 24 months post-surgery. The HRs for Stage I and II patients were low (< 0.007) post-treatment. The HR for Stage III patients peaked at 9.9 months (HR = 0.031) and the hazard curve declined to a plateau at 30 months. Furthermore, the HR peaked at 10.8 months (HR = 0.052) in Stage IV patients and then gradually declined from 50 months.

Conclusions

According to tumour-node-metastasis stage, changes in the HRs of postoperative recurrence in OSCC varied significantly. Intensive surveillance should be undertaken for 3 years in Stage III patients and for 4 years in Stage IV patients, followed by annual screening. For Stage I OSCC patients, a reduction in the surveillance intensity could be taken into consideration.

Population-based study of treatment and outcome of recurrent oesophageal or junctional cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction have a high risk of recurrence after treatment with curative intent. The aim of this study was to analyse the site of recurrence, treatment, and survival in patients with recurrent disease.

METHODS

Patients with non-metastatic oesophageal or junctional carcinoma treated with curative intent between January 2015 and December 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data on recurrence were collected in the second half of 2019. Overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

In total, 862 of 1909 patients (45.2 per cent) for whom information on follow-up was available had disease recurrence, and 858 patients were included. Some 161 of 858 patients (18.8 per cent) had locoregional recurrence only, 415 (48.4 per cent) had distant recurrence only, and 282 (32.9 per cent) had combined locoregional and distant recurrence. In all, 518 of 858 patients (60.4 per cent) received best supportive care only and 315 (39.6 per cent) underwent tumour-directed therapy. Patients with locoregional recurrence alone more often received chemoradiotherapy than those with distant or combined locoregional and distant recurrence (19.3 per cent versus 0.7 and 2.8 per cent), and less often received systemic therapy (11.2 per cent versus 30.1 and 35.8 per cent). Median OS was 7.6, 4.2, and 3.3 months for patients with locoregional, distant, and combined locoregional and distant recurrence respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Disease recurred after curative treatment in 45.2 per cent of patients. Locoregional recurrence developed in only 18.8 per cent. The vast majority of patients presented with distant or combined locoregional and distant recurrence, and received best supportive care.

Importance of long-term surveillance after curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The long-term outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer remain uncertain and the optimal surveillance strategy after curative surgery remains controversial.

METHODS

In this study, the clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent curative thoracic esophagectomy between 1991 and 2015 at Toranomon Hospital were retrospectively analyzed and reviewed until December 2020. We evaluated the accumulated data regarding the pattern and rates of recurrence and second malignancy.

RESULTS

A total of 1054 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. Of these, 97% were followed up for 5 years, and the outcomes after 25 years could be determined in 65.5%. Recurrence was diagnosed in 318 patients (30.2%), and the most common pattern was lymph node metastasis (n = 168, 52.8%). Recurrence was diagnosed within 1 year in 174 patients (54.7%) and within 3 years in 289 (90.9%). Second malignancy possibly occurred through the entire study period after esophagectomy even in early-stage cancer, keeping 2%-5% of the incidental risk. There was no significant difference in the prognosis between 3-year survivors with and without a second malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Most recurrences after resection of esophageal cancer occurred within 3 years regardless of disease stage. However, these patients have an ongoing risk of developing a second malignancy after esophagectomy. Further consideration is required regarding the efficacy of long-term surveillance.

Long-term survival after pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with lung metastasis

OBJECTIVES

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis has a poor prognosis, and the only treatment modality is systemic therapy such as chemotherapy. Previous studies showed that pulmonary metastasectomy may provide benefits and has been suggested in selected patients with colorectal cancer, renal cancer, and sarcoma. However, there were few literatures evaluating the impact and treatment outcome of pulmonary metastasectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with isolated lung metastases. Therefore, we conducted this study.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis. Patients with extrapulmonary metastasis were excluded. We categorized them into two groups - the pulmonary resection group and the systemic treatment only group. We compared the overall survival and progression-free survival between groups, and also analyzed the surgical modality, which includes single or multiple port surgery.

RESULTS

The analysis included 44 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with lung metastasis. Among these 44 patients, 14 patients have received pulmonary metastasectomy, and 30 patients received systemic treatment only. Patients who received pulmonary metastasectomy had significantly better overall survival (p < 0.0001) and progression-free survival (p = 0.038) than those who received only systemic treatment. The one-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 100% and 48% in patients receiving pulmonary metastatectomy, and 49% and 33% in patients receiving only systemic treatment. Among 14 patients receiving pulmonary metastatectomy, 10 patients underwent single port surgery. There were no postoperative complications in these 14 patients.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with lung metastasis who can receive pulmonary metastasectomy have better prognosis, and some patients can achieve long-term survival. Our findings suggest that aggressive pulmonary metastasectomy is suggested in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with if no contraindication. Key question: How about the role of pulmonary metastasectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with isolated lung metastasis?

KEY FINDINGS

Patients who received pulmonary metastasectomy had better overall survival and progression-free survival than those who received only systemic treatment.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Esophageal cancer with isolated pulmonary metastasis can be treated aggressively with pulmonary metastasectomy if no contraindication.

Evaluation of post-operative surveillance strategies for esophageal and gastric cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus or guidelines internationally to inform clinicians of how patients should be monitored for recurrence after esophagogastric resections.

AIM

This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the latest evidence investigating the usefulness of surveillance protocols in patients who underwent esophagectomy or gastrectomy.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Review and Scopus databases. Articles were evaluated for the use of surveillance strategies including history-taking, physical examination, imaging modalities and endoscopy for monitoring patients post-gastrectomy or esophagectomy. Studies that compared surveillance strategies and reported detection of recurrence and post-recurrence survival were also included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies that described a surveillance protocol for post-operative patients were included in the review. Seven studies were used in the meta-analysis. Random-effects analysis demonstrated a statistically significant higher post-recurrence survival (standardized mean difference [SMD] 14.15, 95% CI 1.40-27.26, p = 0.03) with imaging-based planned surveillance post-esophagectomy. However, the detection of recurrence (OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.78-3.97, p = 0.17) for esophageal cancers as well as detection of recurrence (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.11-5.12, p = 0.76) and post-recurrence survival (SMD 6.42, 95% CI -2.16-18.42, p = 0.14) for gastric cancers were not significantly different with planned surveillance.

CONCLUSION

There is no consensus on whether surveillance carries prognostic survival benefit or how surveillance should be carried out. Surveillance may carry prognostic benefit for patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer. Randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate the survival benefits of intensive surveillance strategies, determine the ideal surveillance protocol and tailor it to the appropriate population.

Clinical outcomes of surgical resection for recurrent lesion after curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a nationwide, large-scale retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported the efficacy of resection for recurrent lesions. However, they involved a limited number of subjects. This study aimed to identify a subset of patients who benefit from surgical resection of recurrent lesions after curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Clinicopathological features of 186 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgical treatment for postoperative recurrent lesions at 37 accredited institutions of the Japanese Esophageal Society were evaluated.

RESULTS

The most common recurrence site was the lymph node (106 cases; 58.6%), followed by the lung (40 cases; 22.1%). Univariate analyses revealed that pN 0-1 at esophagectomy (P = 0.0348), recurrence-free interval of ≥ 550 days (P = 0.0306), R0 resection (P < 0.0001), and absence of severe complications after resection for recurrent lesions (Clavien-Dindo grade < IIIa) (P = 0.0472) were associated with better overall survival after surgical resection. According to multivariate analyses, pN 0-1 (P = 0.0146), lung metastasis (P = 0.0274), recurrence-free interval after curative esophagectomy of ≥ 550 days (P = 0.0266), R0 resection (P = 0.0009), and absence of severe complications after resection for recurrent lesions (Clavien-Dindo grade < IIIa) (P = 0.0420) were independent predictive factors for better overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma lesions is a useful option, especially for cases involving lower pN stage, lung metastasis, long recurrence-free intervals after esophagectomy, and technically resectable lesions. Surgical risks should be minimized as much as possible.

Oligometastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus: Current Understanding, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Strategies

Esophageal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive cancer of increasing incidence and is associated with poor prognosis. The early recognition of synchronous and metachronous oligometastasis in esophageal adenocarcinoma may allow for prompt intervention and potentially improved survival. However, curative approaches to oligometastatic esophageal disease remain unproven and may represent an area of emerging divergence of opinion for surgical and medical oncologists. We sought to identify the current understanding and evidence for management of oligometastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma by performing a thorough review of the available literature.

Surgery for metachronous oligometastatic esophageal cancer: Is there enough evidence?

Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite advances in diagnostic modalities and treatment options, five-year survival rates are below 20%. Esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection is the mainstay of treatment. More than 50% of patients experience recurrence within 1-3 years postoperatively. Recurrent disease may present locoregionally at the site of anastomosis or as recurrence through lymphatic spread in lymph node basins, as hematogenic metastasis, or as a combination of these. The standard treatment of recurrence is currently predicated on systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Recent evidence suggests that surgical treatment of metachronous oligometastatic disease may be prognostically advantageous over medical management alone. Given the considerably low response rates to chemoradiotherapy, many institutions have adopted surgical treatment strategies for oligo-recurrent disease on a case-by-case basis. The aim of this article is to review the current evidence on the role of surgical treatment for metachronous oligometastases from esophageal cancer.

Clinical impact of abdominal versus mediastinal metastases as a prognostic factor for poor outcomes following esophageal cancer surgery: a retrospective study

Background

Surgery is still the mainstay of radical treatment for resectable esophageal cancer (EC). It is apparent that the presence or spread of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a powerful prognostic factor in patients with EC who are eligible for curative treatment. Although the importance and efficacy of lymph node dissection in radical esophagectomy have been reported, the clinical or prognostic relevance of specific metastatic patterns within the mediastinal cavity and abdomen remains unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the association of postoperative survival with clinical mediastinal LNM (cMLNM) and abdominal LNM (cALNM) in 157 patients who underwent radical EC surgery at our hospital between May 2012 and March 2018.

Results

A significant difference in cause-specific survival (CSS) was observed between patients with and without cALNM (log-rank p = 0.000). A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that cALNM and thoracic surgery (mediastinal lymphadenectomy via conventional open right thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) independently predicted CSS (p = 0.0007 and 0.021, respectively). Moreover, a significant difference in systemic recurrence-free survival was observed between those with and without cALNM (log-rank p = 0.000). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that cALNM and sex independently predicted systemic recurrence-free survival (p = 0.000 and 0.015, respectively).

Conclusion

cALNM was an independent poor prognostic factor for CSS after EC surgery. It may also be an independent prognostic factor for postoperative systemic recurrence, which can shorten the CSS. For patients with cALNM-positive EC who have a high potential risk of systemic metastases, more extensive treatment besides the conventional perioperative systemic chemotherapy may be necessary.

Surgery for metachronous oligometastatic esophageal cancer: Is there enough evidence?

Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite advances in diagnostic modalities and treatment options, five-year survival rates are below 20%. Esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection is the mainstay of treatment. More than 50% of patients experience recurrence within 1-3 years postoperatively. Recurrent disease may present locoregionally at the site of anastomosis or as recurrence through lymphatic spread in lymph node basins, as hematogenic metastasis, or as a combination of these. The standard treatment of recurrence is currently predicated on systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Recent evidence suggests that surgical treatment of metachronous oligometastatic disease may be prognostically advantageous over medical management alone. Given the considerably low response rates to chemoradiotherapy, many institutions have adopted surgical treatment strategies for oligo-recurrent disease on a case-by-case basis. The aim of this article is to review the current evidence on the role of surgical treatment for metachronous oligometastases from esophageal cancer.

Clinical Significance of Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen for Patients with Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) is a widely used tumor marker of SCC. However, the clinical significance of serum SCC-Ag levels in recurrent esophageal SCC (ESCC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of serum SCC-Ag levels in patients with recurrent ESCC after surgery.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 208 patients who experienced recurrence after curative resection for ESCC. Serum SCC-Ag levels at the time of recurrence were collected from the patients' records. The patients were classified into tertiles based on the serum SCC-Ag values (low, middle, and high), and the clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

Significant differences in sex (p = 0.001), pathologic T (p = 0.034), and N stages of primary cancer (p = 0.015) were observed among the groups. Although the recurrence patterns did not differ significantly, a high SCC-Ag was significantly associated with multiple recurrences (p = 0.019). The high-SCC-Ag group patients demonstrated a shorter time to recurrence than the other groups (p = 0.044). The SCC-Ag levels were significantly associated with overall survival after recurrence (p = 0.036). Multivariate analysis showed that serum SCC-Ag value at recurrence was an independent poor prognosticator (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

Elevated serum SCC-Ag levels at recurrence were significantly associated with a reduced time to recurrence, multiple recurrences, and a poor prognosis after recurrence. An alternative to the current standard treatment is required to improve the outcome for patients with high serum SCC-Ag levels at recurrence.

Postoperative follow-up strategy based on event dynamics for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Despite the improvements in radical surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), a large number of patients still develop recurrence. This research sought to graphically depict patterns in ESCC recurrence following curative surgical treatment using event dynamics and clarify approaches to postsurgical follow-up on the basis of recurrence time.

Methods

This study included 717 individuals with ESCC who received radical surgery in the Thoracic Department at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between 2013 and 2016. Event dynamics analysis was performed on the basis of hazard rates. An initial event was defined as the occurrence of local recurrence, distant metastasis, or both.

Results

After complete resection, patients were followed up for a median of 44 months (range, 2–83 months). A total of 223 (31.1%) patients developed recurrence, including 122 (17.0%) patients who developed only locoregional recurrence, and 101 (14.1%) patients who developed only distant metastasis or both locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis. Recurrences were concentrated mainly (98.2%) in the first 4 years of follow-up among all recurrences, with 100 cases (44.8%) in the first year, 69 cases (30.9%) in the second year, and 50 cases (22.4%) in the third and fourth years.

Conclusions

After curative surgery in a multimodal setting, a significant number of patients still experienced recurrence within 4 years after surgery, which suggests that current postoperative esophageal cancer follow-up strategies may need to be modified.

Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with lymph node recurrence after radical esophagectomy: importance of locoregional therapy

PURPOSE

Lymph node (LN) recurrence is frequently encountered in esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of various factors, including loco-regional treatment of LN-only recurrence, on the survival rate.

METHODS

Among 941 patients who underwent curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in 2003-2016, we retrospectively reviewed 117 patients (12.4%) who developed LN-only recurrence.

RESULTS

One, 2, 3, and 4 or more metastatic LNs were found in 72, 22, 6, and 17 patients, respectively, after a median disease-free interval of 8.4 months (range 1.1-62.0). Among all cases, recurrence was out of the surgical field in 53 cases (45.3%). Recurrent LNs were controlled by loco-regional treatment in 29 (43.9%) and by chemotherapy alone in 3 patients (7.0%). The 3-year survival rates of patients who did and did not achieve local control were 53.2% and 5.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed significant relationships between post-recurrence survival rate and pStage I-II at initial surgery, no history of radiotherapy, recurrence in ≤ 2 LN, and loco-regional treatment of LN recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified recurrence in ≤ 2 LN (HR 0.3169, 95% CI 0.1023-0.5314, p = 0.0038) and loco-regional treatment (HR 0.1973, 95% CI 0.0075-0.3871, p = 0.0416) as the only two significant and independent prognostic factors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence limited to ≤ 2 LN and loco-regional treatment (chemoradiotheapy or surgery) for LN recurrence were associated with favorable survival of patients with history of radical esophagectomy followed by LN recurrence. Our results emphasize the importance of local control of LN recurrence regardless of location.

Oligometastatic recurrence as a prognostic factor after curative resection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

In recent years, the concept of oligometastasis, which represents limited metastatic disease, has gained much interest. This study focuses on the oligometastatic recurrence (OLR) of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after esophagectomy.

METHODS

From among 514 patients who underwent curative resection for ESCC at our hospital between April 2005 and December 2019, 97 patients with recurrence were enrolled in this study. OLR was defined as fewer than five recurrences in a single organ. We analyzed the prognostic factors for patients with OLR after curative resection of ESCC, especially the relationship between the recurrence pattern and prognosis according to treatment, defined as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) and chemotherapy with local therapy as combined local therapy (CLT).

RESULTS

OLR was identified in 43 (44%) of the 97 patients with recurrence. The OLR group had a significantly better prognosis than the non-OLR group (P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that OLR was a prognostic factor after recurrence (P = 0.007) and that CLT after recurrence was the only prognostic factor in the OLR group (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that OLR is a prognostic factor after resection of ESCC and that CLT is a promising treatment modality for patients with OLR after curative resection of ESCC.

Expression of miR-1304 in patients with esophageal carcinoma and risk factors for recurrence

BACKGROUND

Esophageal carcinoma is a malignant gastrointestinal tumor with a very poor prognosis. MicroRNA (miR)-1304 is a newly discovered non-coding RNA, which shows differential expression in other cancers, and its clinical value in esophageal carcinoma remains unclear.

AIM

To explore the expression of miR-1304 in patients with esophageal carcinoma and its clinical value.

METHODS

The expression of miR-1304 in patients with esophageal carcinoma was analyzed based on the data on miR in esophageal carcinoma downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was adopted to determine the expression of miR-1304 in the tissues and serum of patients. The clinical diagnostic value of miR-1304 and independent factors for recurrence and prognosis of esophageal carcinoma were then analyzed. The potential target genes of miR-1304 were predicted, and then analyzed based on gene ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes, and Genomes, and protein-protein interaction.

RESULTS

The expression of miR-1304 in the tissues and serum of patients with esophageal carcinoma increased, and was also increased according to the database. Patients with high expression of miR-1304 suffered increased rates of tumor ≥ 3 cm, low differentiation and stage II + III. miR-1304 had a diagnostic value in identifying esophageal carcinoma, tumor size, differentiation and TNM stage. Tumor size, differentiation, TNM stage, and miR-1304 were independent risk factors for recurrence of esophageal carcinoma, and they had certain predictive and diagnostic value for the recurrence of esophageal carcinoma. Seventy-eight patients showed a 3-year survival rate of 38.46%, and patients with high expression of miR-1304 had a relatively lower survival rate. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size, differentiation, recurrence and miR-1304 were independent factors for the prognosis of patients. MiRTarBase, miRDB, and Targetscan predicted 20 target genes in total. Gene ontology enrichment analysis found 18 functions with ^aP < 0.05, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes, and Genomes analysis found 11 signal pathways with ^aP < 0.05. String analysis of protein co-expression found 269 relationship pairs, of which co-expression with epidermal growth factor was the most common.

CONCLUSION

miR-1304 can be used as a potential indicator for the diagnosis and recurrence of esophageal carcinoma and for survival of patients with this disease.

Weekly Chemotherapy of 5-Fluorouracil plus Cisplatin Concurrent with Radiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients with Postoperative Locoregional Recurrence: Results from a Phase II Study

LESSONS LEARNED

Weekly treatment with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, concurrent with radiotherapy, achieved promising response rates in patients with postoperative recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Superior toxicity results were also found.

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is one of the treatment strategies for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with postoperative locoregional recurrence. However, the once every 3 weeks chemotherapy regimen causes a high incidence of toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in postoperative locoregional recurrent ESCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients received four weekly chemotherapy cycles of cisplatin (25 mg/m² , day 1) plus 5-FU (1,176 mg/m² , day 1-3), and concurrent with radiotherapy (50.4-60 Gy). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were toxicity, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Between January 2013 and December 2015, 48 patients were enrolled. The ORR was 68.8% (12 patients with complete response, 21 patients with partial response), with DCR 68.8%. No treatment-related grade 4 adverse events occurred. Grade 3 hematologic toxicities were observed in eight (17%) patients. Grade 3 vomiting or esophagitis occurred in four (8%) patients each. The median PFS and OS were 13.94 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-51.05) and 27.43 months (95% CI, 5.278-49.58; Fig. 1).

CONCLUSION

Weekly 5-FU and cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy achieved a promising response rate and improved toxicity in patients with postoperative locoregional recurrent ESCC.

Management of Liver Oligometastatic Esophageal Cancer: Overview and Critical Analysis of the Different Loco-Regional Treatments

Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive disease that is associated with a poor prognosis. Since metastastic EC is usually considered suitable only for palliative therapy with an estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) less than 5%, the optimal management of patients with liver oligometastatic EC (LOEC) is still undefined. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the different treatment options for LOEC. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane to identify articles evaluating different treatment strategies for LOEC. Among 828 records that were identified, 20 articles met the inclusion criteria. These studies included patients who have undergone any type of surgical procedure and/or loco-regional therapy. Liver resection resulted in the best survival for patients with low tumor burden (3 lesions): 5-year OS 30–50% versus 8–12% after only chemotherapy (CHT). The 5-year OS of loco-regional therapies was 23% with a local recurrence risk ranging 0–8% for small lesions (2 to 3 cm). An aggressive multidisciplinary approach for LOEC patients may improve survival. Surgery seems to be the treatment of choice for resectable LOEC. If unfeasible, loco-regional therapies may be considered. In order to better select these patients and offer a chance of cure, prospective trials and a definition of treatment protocols are needed.

Detection and management of oligometastatic disease in oesophageal cancer and identification of prognostic factors: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer worldwide. The prognosis of oesophageal cancer patients still remains poor. The 5-year survival rate rarely exceeds 5% in case of metastatic disease. Some patients may however present with oligometastasis which can be treated with loco-regional therapy.

AIM

To assess the current practice regarding the management of patients with oligometastatic oesophageal cancer and identify prognostic factors affecting survival following treatment for oligometastasis.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed in Cochrance Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from September 1950 to January 2019. Relevant electronic databases were searched for studies assessing the clinical outcome of oligometastasis.

RESULTS

A total of 14 publications were included, of which 12 studies assessing metachronous oligometastasis and 2 on synchronous oligometastasis. All included articles evaluated the specific outcomes of metastasis, management modality and survival outcomes. The majority of the patients presented with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The median disease free interval (time to recurrence) in patients was 19.6 mo and the overall survival reached 30.8 months. Unfavourable prognostic factors were assessed in eight studies and included time to recurrence < 12 mo, large diameter pulmonary lesions (> 20 mm), disease free interval (DFI) < 12 mo, extra-pulmonary metastasis, primary tumour pathological stage III/IV.

CONCLUSION

Oligometastatic oesophageal cancer in selected patients is amenable to loco-regional treatment, and the overall survival of this patient cohort may be improved with patient and tumour-specific treatments.

How does presurgical chemotherapy influence the efficiency of treatment for esophageal cancer recurrence after curative esophagectomy?

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of treatments for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), particularly chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT), remains unclear in patients who have previously been administered the same drugs during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 117 patients with recurrent thoracic ESCCs who had undergone curative resection were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on presurgical treatment: no presurgical treatment (n = 74), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 43). Prognosis after recurrence was analyzed differently in the group of patients who received CRT and chemotherapy for a recurrent site because of differences in recurrence patterns.

RESULTS

There were no differences in patterns and times to recurrence between the patients who underwent each presurgical treatment. For treatment of recurrence, CRT was administered to 66 patients, chemotherapy to 32, surgical resection to 5, and best supportive care to 14. In patients who underwent CRT for local recurrence, the survival rates of those administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy were similar to those who did not receive any presurgical treatment (P = 0.706). In patients who underwent chemotherapy for distant metastasis, the survival rates of those administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy were worse than in those who did not receive any presurgical treatment (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of CRT for recurrent cancers are not influenced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy, even when using the same anticancer agent. Chemotherapy is an acceptable treatment for patients who do not receive presurgical treatment.

Patterns and Outcomes of Recurrent Esophageal Cancer After Curative Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The recurrence patterns and therapeutic outcomes of patients with recurrent esophageal cancer after curative esophagectomy are not fully understood.

METHODS

Data on recurrence patterns and sites of recurrence in patients with recurrent esophageal cancer after curative esophagectomy from 2005 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Time to recurrence after curative esophagectomy and survival after recurrence were compared among groups stratified by recurrence pattern and site. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify clinicopathological parameters influencing survival after recurrence.

RESULTS

Of the 290 patients identified, a single pattern of recurrence occurred in 224 patients (77.2%) and a multiple pattern of recurrence occurred in 66 patients (22.8%). The most frequent recurrence pattern was lymph node in 173 patients (59.7%), followed by distant organ in 133 patients (45.9%). Median time to recurrence and median survival after recurrence of all patients were 228 and 327 days, respectively. Among patients with lymph node or lung recurrence, there were 5-year survivors after recurrence who underwent multimodal therapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that longer disease-free interval [hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.52-0.93], single pattern of recurrence (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39-0.74), and curative treatment for recurrence (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10-0.28) were significantly associated with favorable prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the prognosis of recurrent esophageal cancer remains unfavorable, if multimodal treatment that includes local therapy was curative, prognosis could improve, especially in patients with lymph node or lung recurrence.

The role of surgical treatment in isolated organ recurrence of esophageal cancer-a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Despite the improvements in the early detection and treatment of non-metastatic esophageal cancer, more than half of patients undergoing a curative treatment for esophageal cancer will develop recurrence within three years. The prognosis of these patients is poor. However, a wide range in overall survival has been reported, depending on the pattern of recurrence, and no optimal treatment strategy following recurrence has yet been uniformly accepted.

AIM

In this article, we aimed to systematically review the literature for the role of surgical resection of metachronous distant metastasis following primary treatment of esophageal cancer. Furthermore, we discuss possible factors that could possibly predict which patients may benefit from a surgical approach. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed using combinations of keywords.

RESULTS

Patients with recurrence may benefit of a multimodality treatment. Regarding the isolated recurrence of esophageal cancer in solid visceral organs, operative intervention has been proposed as a treatment that may offer a survival benefit in an individual basis. No definitive conclusions regarding the potential survival advantage offered by the surgical treatment of solitary recurrent lesions can be drawn. However, recent improvements in surgical treatment and optimization of perioperative management guarantee an acceptable operative risk, making surgical resection of solitary recurrence lesions a considerable therapeutic option.

CONCLUSIONS

It can be conferred from the available studies that the surgical treatment of isolated recurrence from esophageal cancer may offer a survival benefit for properly selected patients. Prospective, multicenter studies might be useful to gain a better insight into those factors that affect selection of patients to take benefit from an operative intervention.

Prognosis and Treatment After Diagnosis of Recurrent Esophageal Carcinoma Following Esophagectomy with Curative Intent

Background

Strategies for the treatment of recurrence after initial curative esophagectomy are increasingly being recognized. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors that affect survival in patients with recurrence and to evaluate treatment strategies.

Methods

A prospective database (2003–2013) was used to collect consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with initial curative esophagectomy. Locations, symptoms, and treatment of recurrence were registered. Post-recurrence survival was defined as the time between the first recurrence and death or last follow-up.

Results

Of the 335 selected patients, 171 (51 %) developed recurrence. Multivariable analysis identified distant recurrence as opposed to locoregional recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) 2.15, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.27–3.65; p = 0.005], more than three recurrent locations (HR 2.42, 95 % CI 1.34–4.34; p = 0.003), and treatment (HR 0.29, 95 % CI 0.20–0.44; p < 0.001) as independent prognostic factors associated with post-recurrence survival. Primary tumor characteristics, including neoadjuvant therapy, histological type, pTN stage, and radicality, did not independently influence post-recurrence survival. Treatment was initiated in 62 patients (37 %) and included chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or surgery. Median post-recurrence survival of all patients was 3.0 months (range 0–112). In total, six patients (4 %) were still disease-free following treatment, indicating cure.

Conclusions

In patients treated for esophageal cancer at curative intent, distant recurrence and more than three recurrent locations were independent prognostic factors associated with worse post-recurrence survival, irrespective of primary tumor characteristics. Although survival after recurrence was poor, treatment can prolong survival and can even lead to cure in selected patients.

Diagnostic Performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET and PET/CT for the Detection of Recurrent Esophageal Cancer After Treatment with Curative Intent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET and integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing recurrent esophageal cancer after initial treatment with curative intent.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were systematically searched for all relevant literature using the key words "(18)F-FDG PET" and "esophageal cancer" and synonyms. Studies examining the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET or integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT, either in routine clinical follow-up or in symptomatic patients in whom recurrence of esophageal cancer was suspected, were deemed eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the presence of recurrent esophageal cancer as determined by histopathologic biopsy or clinical follow-up. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Sensitivities and specificities of individual studies were meta-analyzed using bivariate random-effects models.

RESULTS

Eight eligible studies were included for meta-analysis, comprising 486 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT after previous treatment with curative intent. The quality of the included studies assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool was considered reasonable; there were few concerns with regard to the risk of bias and applicability. Integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT and standalone (18)F-FDG PET were used in 4 and 3 studies, respectively. One other study analyzed both modalities separately. In 4 studies, (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT was performed as part of routine follow-up, whereas in 4 other studies the diagnostic test was performed on indication during clinical follow-up. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity for (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT in diagnosing recurrent esophageal cancer were 96% (95% confidence interval, 93%-97%) and 78% (95% confidence interval, 66%-86%), respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy according to type of PET scanner (standalone PET vs. integrated PET/CT) or indication of scanning (routine follow-up vs. on indication).

CONCLUSION

(18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT are reliable imaging modalities with a high sensitivity and moderate specificity for detecting recurrent esophageal cancer after treatment with curative intent. The use of (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT particularly allows for a minimal false-negative rate. However, histopathologic confirmation of (18)F-FDG PET- or PET/CT-suspected lesions remains required, because a considerable false-positive rate is noticed.