1
|
Martínez Bravo WR, García Vicente AM, Noriega Álvarez E, González García B, López-de la Manzanara C, Cordero García JM, Soriano Castrejón Á. Failure of scintigraphy lymphatic mapping in endometrial cancer. Causes and solutions. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022; 41:78-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
2
|
Concin N, Planchamp F, Abu-Rustum NR, Ataseven B, Cibula D, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Knapp P, Marth C, Morice P, Querleu D, Sehouli J, Stepanyan A, Taskiran C, Vergote I, Wimberger P, Zapardiel I, Persson J. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1508-1529. [PMID: 34795020 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of surgical care as a crucial component of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary management improves outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma, notably helping to avoid suboptimal surgical treatment. Quality indicators (QIs) enable healthcare professionals to measure their clinical management with regard to ideal standards of care. OBJECTIVE In order to complete its set of QIs for the surgical management of gynecological cancers, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) initiated the development of QIs for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS QIs were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and documentation of the scientific evidence, two consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians and patient representatives. QIs were defined using a structured format comprising metrics specifications, and targets. A scoring system was then developed to ensure applicability and feasibility of a future ESGO accreditation process based on these QIs for endometrial carcinoma surgery and support any institutional or governmental quality assurance programs. RESULTS Twenty-nine structural, process and outcome indicators were defined. QIs 1-5 are general indicators related to center case load, training, experience of the surgeon, structured multi-disciplinarity of the team and active participation in clinical research. QIs 6 and 7 are related to the adequate pre-operative investigations. QIs 8-22 are related to peri-operative standards of care. QI 23 is related to molecular markers for endometrial carcinoma diagnosis and as determinants for treatment decisions. QI 24 addresses the compliance of management of patients after primary surgical treatment with the standards of care. QIs 25-29 highlight the need for a systematic assessment of surgical morbidity and oncologic outcome as well as standardized and comprehensive documentation of surgical and pathological elements. Each QI was associated with a score. An assessment form including a scoring system was built as basis for ESGO accreditation of centers for endometrial cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria .,Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial Sloann Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Pawel Knapp
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Oncology Center of Bialystok, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Alsace, France
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Artem Stepanyan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Nairi Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, VKV American Hospital, Istambul, Turkey
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martínez Bravo WR, García Vicente AM, Noriega Álvarez E, González García B, López-de la Manzanara C, Cordero García JM, Soriano Castrejón Á. Failure of scintigraphy lymphatic mapping in endometrial cancer. Causes and solutions. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2021; 41:S2253-654X(21)00059-7. [PMID: 34420892 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2021.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the effect of technical problems and patient characteristics on sentinel lymph node (SLN) scintigraphic detection and mapping success in early stages of endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS Patients with clinical early stage EC (IA-IB) underwent SLN mapping using technetium-99m-nanocolloid,between September 2011 and February 2020. were included. There were excluded cases with technical problems, 92 patients were included for the analysis of the diagnostic performance and the relation of mapping failure (pelvic unilateral or not detected SLN) with patient (age, body mass index, previous pelvic disease or surgery) and disease characteristics (histology, grade, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space infiltration, tumor size, and lymphatic infiltration risk). RESULTS The overall detection rate was 79%. Lymph node metastases were diagnosed in 7 patients. Age (p=0.01), depth of myometrial invasion ≥ 50% (p=0.04) and high risk of lymphatic infiltration (p=0.02) were positively associated with mapping failure. In multivariate analysis, age was significantly associated with mapping failure [odds ratio=1.63, 95%CI: 1.06-2.50; p=0.027]. CONCLUSIONS Age, depth of myometrial invasion and high risk of lymphatic infiltration were the factors associated with higher mapping failure. An individualized injection technique, optimizing the methodology, could minimize the detection failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A M García Vicente
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, Ciudad Real, España.
| | - E Noriega Álvarez
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, Ciudad Real, España
| | - B González García
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, Ciudad Real, España
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer, is the role of Nuclear Medicine specialist still needed? Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2021. [PMID: 34312107 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
5
|
Paredes P, Díaz-Feijoo B. Management of the sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer: Is the role of Nuclear Medicine specialists still needed? Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2021; 40:273-274. [PMID: 34312106 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar Paredes
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Facultat de Medicina - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Berta Díaz-Feijoo
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Facultat de Medicina - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Unidad de Ginecología Oncológica, Institut Clínic de Ginecologia, Obstetríciai Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nagar H, Wietek N, Goodall RJ, Hughes W, Schmidt-Hansen M, Morrison J. Sentinel node biopsy for diagnosis of lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 6:CD013021. [PMID: 34106467 PMCID: PMC8189170 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013021.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic lymphadenectomy provides prognostic information for those diagnosed with endometrial (womb) cancer and provides information that may influence decisions regarding adjuvant treatment. However, studies have not shown a therapeutic benefit, and lymphadenectomy causes significant morbidity. The technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), allows the first draining node from a cancer to be identified and examined histologically for involvement with cancer cells. SLNB is commonly used in other cancers, including breast and vulval cancer. Different tracers, including colloid labelled with radioactive technetium-99, blue dyes, e.g. patent or methylene blue, and near infra-red fluorescent dyes, e.g. indocyanine green (ICG), have been used singly or in combination for detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). OBJECTIVES To assess the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the identification of pelvic lymph node involvement in women with endometrial cancer, presumed to be at an early stage prior to surgery, including consideration of the detection rate. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE (1946 to July 2019), Embase (1974 to July 2019) and the relevant Cochrane trial registers. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of tracers for SLN assessment (involving the identification of a SLN plus histological examination) against a reference standard of histological examination of removed pelvic +/- para-aortic lymph nodes following systematic pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PLND/PPALND) in women with endometrial cancer, where there were sufficient data for the construction of two-by-two tables. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors (a combination of HN, JM, NW, RG, and WH) independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance, classified studies for inclusion/exclusion and extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We calculated the detection rate as the arithmetic mean of the total number of SLNs detected out of the total number of women included in the included studies with the woman as the unit of analysis, used univariate meta-analytical methods to estimate pooled sensitivity estimates, and summarised the results using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS The search revealed 6259 unique records after removal of duplicates. After screening 232 studies in full text, we found 73 potentially includable records (for 52 studies), although we were only able to extract 2x2 table data for 33 studies, including 2237 women (46 records) for inclusion in the review, despite writing to trial authors for additional information. We found 11 studies that analysed results for blue dye alone, four studies for technetium-99m alone, 12 studies that used a combination of blue dye and technetium-99m, nine studies that used indocyanine green (ICG) and near infra-red immunofluorescence, and one study that used a combination of ICG and technetium-99m. Overall, the methodological reporting in most of the studies was poor, which resulted in a very large proportion of 'unclear risk of bias' ratings. Overall, the mean SLN detection rate was 86.9% (95% CI 82.9% to 90.8%; 2237 women; 33 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). In studies that reported bilateral detection the mean rate was 65.4% (95% CI 57.8% to 73.0%) . When considered according to which tracer was used, the SLN detection rate ranged from 77.8% (95% CI 70.0% to 85.6%) for blue dye alone (559 women; 11 studies; low-certainty evidence) to 100% for ICG and technetium-99m (32 women; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). The rates of positive lymph nodes ranged from 5.2% to 34.4% with a mean of 20.1% (95% CI 17.7% to 22.3%). The pooled sensitivity of SLNB was 91.8% (95% CI 86.5% to 95.1%; total 2237 women, of whom 409 had SLN involvement; moderate-certainty evidence). The sensitivity for of SLNB for the different tracers were: blue dye alone 95.2% (95% CI 77.2% to 99.2%; 559 women; 11 studies; low-certainty evidence); Technetium-99m alone 90.5% (95% CI 67.7% to 97.7%; 257 women; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence); technetium-99m and blue dye 91.9% (95% CI 74.4% to 97.8%; 548 women; 12 studies; low-certainty evidence); ICG alone 92.5% (95% CI 81.8% to 97.1%; 953 women; 9 studies; moderate-certainty evidence); ICG and blue dye 90.5% (95% CI 63.2.6% to 98.1%; 215 women; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence); and ICG and technetium-99m 100% (95% CI 63% to 100%; 32 women; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). Meta-regression analyses found that the sensitivities did not differ between the different tracers used, between studies with a majority of women with FIGO stage 1A versus 1B or above; between studies assessing the pelvic lymph node basin alone versus the pelvic and para-aortic lymph node basin; or between studies that used subserosal alone versus subserosal and cervical injection. It should be noted that a false-positive result cannot occur, as the histological examination of the SLN is unchanged by the results from any additional nodes removed at systematic lymphadenectomy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The diagnostic test accuracy for SLNB using either ICG alone or a combination of a dye (blue or ICG) and technetium-99m is probably good, with high sensitivity, where a SLN could be detected. Detection rates with ICG or a combination of dye (ICG or blue) and technetium-99m may be higher. The value of a SLNB approach in a treatment pathway, over adjuvant treatment decisions based on uterine factors and molecular profiling, requires examination in a high-quality intervention study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Nagar
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast City Hospital and the Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Nina Wietek
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard J Goodall
- Department of Surgery and Cancer , Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Will Hughes
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mia Schmidt-Hansen
- National Guideline Alliance, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, GRACE Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann J, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Martin AG, Lax S, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell D, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza A, Taylor A, Westermann A, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Creutzberg CL. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2021; 154:327-353. [PMID: 33712263 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria; Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany.
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, UK
| | | | - Sigurd Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Austria; School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy
| | | | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Concin N, Creutzberg CL, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann JA, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, González-Martín A, Lax SF, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell DE, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza AE, Taylor A, Westermann AM, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Matias-Guiu X. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2021; 478:153-190. [PMID: 33604759 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-020-03007-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. .,Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Sigurd F Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria.,School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina E Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke M Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann J, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Gonzalez Martin A, Lax S, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell D, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza A, Taylor A, Westermann A, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Creutzberg CL. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:12-39. [PMID: 33397713 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 797] [Impact Index Per Article: 199.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multi-disciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria .,Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Sigurd Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria.,School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reinhold C, Ueno Y, Akin EA, Bhosale PR, Dudiak KM, Jhingran A, Kang SK, Kilcoyne A, Lakhman Y, Nicola R, Pandharipande PV, Paspulati R, Shinagare AB, Small W, Vargas HA, Whitcomb BP, Glanc P. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Endometrial Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:S472-S486. [PMID: 33153558 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
To date, there is little consensus on the role of pelvic imaging in assessing local disease extent during initial staging in patients with endometrial carcinoma, with practices differing widely across centers. However, when pretreatment assessment of local tumor extent is indicated, MRI is the preferred imaging modality. Preoperative imaging of endometrial carcinoma can define the extent of disease and indicate the need for subspecialist referral in the presence of deep myometrial invasion, cervical extension, or suspected lymphadenopathy. If distant metastatic disease is clinically suspected, preoperative assessment with cross-sectional imaging or PET/CT may be performed. However, most patients with low-grade disease are at low risk of lymph node and distant metastases. Thus, this group may not require a routine pretreatment evaluation for distant metastases. Recurrence rates in patients with endometrial carcinoma are infrequent. Therefore, radiologic evaluation is typically used only to investigate suspicion of recurrent disease due to symptoms or physical examination and not for routine surveillance after treatment. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yoshiko Ueno
- Research Author, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Esma A Akin
- George Washington University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | | | - Anuja Jhingran
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stella K Kang
- New York University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Yulia Lakhman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Refky Nicola
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, Buffalo, New York
| | | | - Rajmohan Paspulati
- University Hospitals Medical Group Radiology, Cleveland, Ohio, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Atul B Shinagare
- Brigham & Women's Hospital Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William Small
- Stritch School of Medicine Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
| | | | - Bradford P Whitcomb
- University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut; Society of Gynecologic Oncology
| | - Phyllis Glanc
- Specialty Chair, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Soderini A, Depietri V, Crespe M, Rodriguez Y, Aragona A. The role of sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial carcinoma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 72:367-383. [PMID: 32921021 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4784.20.04626-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most commonly diagnosed gynecological malignancy in developing countries, and the second malignancy after cervical cancer in developing countries. The primary treatment is based on surgical and pathologic staging including extrafascial type A radical hysterectomy bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic and latero-aortic lymphadenectomy. Minimally invasive surgery is the most widely used technique. Sentinel node biopsy is part of this concept and has reached the management of endometrial cancer. The aim of this review was to describe the history, the different injection techniques and results of sentinel node biopsy, and analyze the future role of this technique in endometrial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Soderini
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Marie Curie Oncologic Hospital, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina -
| | - Valeria Depietri
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Marie Curie Oncologic Hospital, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Martin Crespe
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Marie Curie Oncologic Hospital, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Yanina Rodriguez
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Marie Curie Oncologic Hospital, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alejandro Aragona
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Marie Curie Oncologic Hospital, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Novy Z, Lobaz V, Vlk M, Kozempel J, Stepanek P, Popper M, Vrbkova J, Hajduch M, Hruby M, Petrik M. Head-To-Head Comparison of Biological Behavior of Biocompatible Polymers Poly(Ethylene Oxide), Poly(2-Ethyl-2-Oxazoline) and Poly[N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)Methacrylamide] as Coating Materials for Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles in Animal Solid Tumor Model. NANOMATERIALS 2020; 10:nano10091690. [PMID: 32867391 PMCID: PMC7558523 DOI: 10.3390/nano10091690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Nanoparticles (NPs) represent an emerging platform for diagnosis and treatment of various diseases such as cancer, where they can take advantage of enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for solid tumor accumulation. To improve their colloidal stability, prolong their blood circulation time and avoid premature entrapment into reticuloendothelial system, coating with hydrophilic biocompatible polymers is often essential. Most studies, however, employ just one type of coating polymer. The main purpose of this study is to head-to-head compare biological behavior of three leading polymers commonly used as “stealth” coating materials for biocompatibilization of NPs poly(ethylene oxide), poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) and poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide] in an in vivo animal solid tumor model. We used radiolabeled biodegradable hydroxyapatite NPs as a model nanoparticle core within this study and we anchored the polymers to the NPs core by hydroxybisphosphonate end groups. The general suitability of polymers for coating of NPs intended for solid tumor accumulation is that poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) and poly(ethylene oxide) gave comparably similar very good results, while poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide] was significantly worse. We did not observe a strong effect of molecular weight of the coating polymers on tumor and organ accumulation, blood circulation time, biodistribution and biodegradation of the NPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zbynek Novy
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Hnevotinska 5, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (Z.N.); (M.P.); (J.V.); (M.H.)
| | - Volodymyr Lobaz
- Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry AS CR, Heyrovskeho namesti 1888/2, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech Republic; (V.L.); (P.S.)
| | - Martin Vlk
- Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Brehova 7, 115 19 Prague 1, Czech Republic; (M.V.); (J.K.)
| | - Jan Kozempel
- Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Brehova 7, 115 19 Prague 1, Czech Republic; (M.V.); (J.K.)
| | - Petr Stepanek
- Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry AS CR, Heyrovskeho namesti 1888/2, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech Republic; (V.L.); (P.S.)
| | - Miroslav Popper
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Hnevotinska 5, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (Z.N.); (M.P.); (J.V.); (M.H.)
| | - Jana Vrbkova
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Hnevotinska 5, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (Z.N.); (M.P.); (J.V.); (M.H.)
| | - Marian Hajduch
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Hnevotinska 5, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (Z.N.); (M.P.); (J.V.); (M.H.)
| | - Martin Hruby
- Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry AS CR, Heyrovskeho namesti 1888/2, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech Republic; (V.L.); (P.S.)
- Correspondence: (M.H.); (M.P.); Tel.: + 420-296-809-130 (M.H.); + 420-585-632-126 (M.P.)
| | - Milos Petrik
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Hnevotinska 5, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (Z.N.); (M.P.); (J.V.); (M.H.)
- Correspondence: (M.H.); (M.P.); Tel.: + 420-296-809-130 (M.H.); + 420-585-632-126 (M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gaudet Chardonnet A, Azaïs H, Ballester M, Raimond E, Bendifallah S, Ouldamer L, Coutant C, Graesslin O, Touboul C, Collinet P, Bricou A, Huchon C, Daraï E, Lavoue V, Koskas M, Uzan C, Canlorbe G. Prognostic Value and Risk Factors of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Recurrence for Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Multicenter Study from the FRANCOGYN Group. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:212-221. [PMID: 32648177 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08812-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis for patients with endometrial cancer (EC) peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) recurrence has received little study. This study aimed to determine specific risk factors and prognosis of EC with PC recurrence (PCR) versus no PC recurrence (NPCR). METHODS Data of all patients with EC who received primary surgical treatment between January 2000 and February 2017 were abstracted from the French FRANCOGYN Research Group database. Clinical and pathologic variables were compared between the two groups (PCR vs. NPCR). Multivariate analysis was performed to define prognostic factors for peritoneal recurrence. Overall survivals (OS) of patients after recurrence were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The study analyzed 1466 patients, and 257 of these patients (17.5%) had recurrence. At presentation, 63 of these patients had PC. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages 3 and 4 disease were significantly associated with PCR versus NPCR (odds ratio 2.24; 95% confidence interval 1.23-4.07; p = 0.008). The death rate for the patients with PC was 47.6%, with a median survival of 12 months after diagnosis of recurrence. According to the histologic subtype, OS was 29 months (Q1-Q3, 13-NA) for endometrioid carcinomas, 7.5 months (Q1-Q3, 4-15) for serous carcinomas, and 10 months (Q1-Q3, 5-15) for clear cell carcinomas. Chemotherapy for treatment of PCR was associated with improved OS after recurrence (OSAR; p = 0.0025). CONCLUSION An initial advanced stage of EC is a risk factor for PCR. For women with PCR, a diagnosis of type 1 EC recurrence more than 12 months after the initial treatment and management of PCR with chemotherapy is associated with improved OSAR. Prospective studies are needed to determine the precise optimal management required in this clinical situation and to assess the relevance of biomarkers to predict the risk of PCR for EC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gaudet Chardonnet
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - H Azaïs
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Ballester
- Service de Chirurgie Gynécologique et Mammaire, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - E Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France.,INSERM UMR_S_938, "Cancer Biology and Therapeutics," Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - L Ouldamer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
| | - C Coutant
- Center de Lutte Contre le Cancer Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - O Graesslin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - C Touboul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Créteil, France
| | - P Collinet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Créteil, France.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille, France
| | - A Bricou
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Jean Verdier University Hospital, Bondy, France
| | - C Huchon
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Poissy, France
| | - E Daraï
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France.,INSERM UMR_S_938, "Cancer Biology and Therapeutics," Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - V Lavoue
- Service de Gynécologie, INSERM 1242, Oncogenesis, Stress and Signaling, CRLC Eugène Marquis, Université de Rennes 1, Hopital Sud, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - M Koskas
- Service de Chirurgie et Oncologie Gynécologique et Mammaire, APHP, Université Paris Diderot Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France
| | - C Uzan
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.,INSERM UMR_S_938, "Cancer Biology and Therapeutics," Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - G Canlorbe
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France. .,INSERM UMR_S_938, "Cancer Biology and Therapeutics," Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Sorbonne University, Paris, France. .,Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reboux PA, Azaïs H, Canova CH, Bendifallah S, Ouldamer L, Raimond E, Hudry D, Coutant C, Graesslin O, Touboul C, Collinet P, Bricou A, Huchon C, Daraï E, Ballester M, Lévêque J, Lavoué V, Koskas M, Uzan C, Canlorbe G. Impact of vaginal brachytherapy in intermediate and high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer: a multicenter study from the FRANCOGYN group. J Gynecol Oncol 2019; 30:e53. [PMID: 31074238 PMCID: PMC6543117 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective According to recent European Society of Medical Oncology, European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines, adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (VB) is optional in patients with intermediate risk (IR) and high-intermediate risk (HIR) endometrial cancer (EC). The aim of this French retrospective, multicenter study was to assess the impact of VB in these groups on local recurrence rate, local recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods Data of 191 patients with IR and HIR EC who underwent primary surgery with or without VB and no other adjuvant treatment between 2000 and 2016 were extracted from the FRANCOGYN database. Rate of local recurrence, OS and local RFS in these two groups were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The number of patients with IR and HIR EC were 118 and 73 respectively. VB was used in 92 patients in IR group and 43 in HIR group. Median follow-up was 22 months. In the HIR group, the local recurrence rate was significantly higher in the no adjuvant therapy group in comparison with the VB group (16.7% and 0% respectively, p=0.02). There was also a significant improvement in local RFS (p=0.01) in VB group. In IR EC, there is no significant difference on local recurrence rate (4.2% and 3.2%, respectively, p=1.00) or local RFS (p=0.54) between the two groups. Conclusions VB is an efficient adjuvant treatment for patients with HIR EC. VB is not associated with an improvement of RFS or OS in IR EC patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Alain Reboux
- Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Paris, France
| | - Henri Azaïs
- Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Paris, France
| | - Charles Henry Canova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Paris, France.,INSERM UMR_S_938, "Cancer Biology and Therapeutics", Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Lobna Ouldamer
- Department of Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France; INSERM U1069, Université François-Rabelas, Tours, France
| | - Emilie Raimond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Delphine Hudry
- Center de Lutte Contre le Cancer Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Center de Lutte Contre le Cancer Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Olivier Graesslin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute Alix de Champagne University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Créteil, France
| | - Pierre Collinet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille, France
| | - Alexandre Bricou
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Jean Verdier University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), University Paris 13, Bondy, France
| | - Cyrille Huchon
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Poissy, France
| | - Emile Daraï
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Paris, France
| | - Marcos Ballester
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Paris, France
| | - Jean Lévêque
- CHU de Rennes, Service de Gynécologie, Hopital Sud, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- CHU de Rennes, Service de Gynécologie, Hopital Sud, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.,INSERM 1242, Oncogenesis, Stress and Signaling, CRLC Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Martin Koskas
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Uzan
- Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Paris, France.,INSERM UMR_S_938, "Cancer Biology and Therapeutics", Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Geoffroy Canlorbe
- Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Paris, France.,INSERM UMR_S_938, "Cancer Biology and Therapeutics", Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sahbai S, Taran FA, Staebler A, Wallwiener D, la Fougère C, Brucker S, Dittmann H. Sentinel lymph node mapping using SPECT/CT and gamma probe in endometrial cancer: an analysis of parameters affecting detection rate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44:1511-1519. [PMID: 28374119 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3692-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2016] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE SPECT/CT after pericervical injection of technetium-99 m-nanocolloid was shown to be suitable for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in endometrial cancer (EC). The aim of this study was to analyze factors affecting successful SLN detection by means of SPECT/CT such as imaging findings, patient characteristics and tumor biology in a large cohort of patients. METHODS One hundred and forty-five consecutive patients suffering from EC who received pre-surgical SLN mapping at our institution between 2011 and 2016 were included in this analysis. SPECT/CT data of abdomen and pelvis (mean 4:20 ± 1:20 h p.i.) were acquired after pericervical injection of technetium-99 m-nanocolloid (mean 230 ± 45 MBq) in all patients. Surgical staging was performed on the day after. Acquisition parameters, patient characteristics, SPECT/CT findings as well as histopathological results were collected. RESULTS A total of 282 SLNs were identified by means of SPECT/CT. Overall, preoperative and intraoperative SLN detection rates were 86%, 76% and 74% respectively. The most important factor associated with failure to detect SLNs was the presence of high bone marrow on SPECT/CT (p = 0.005). Peritoneal/abdominal radioactivity was also associated with missed SLN detection in SPECT/CT (p = 0.02). However, the presence of liver/spleen uptake on its own was not predictive for detection failure. Low numbers of detected SLNs in SPECT/CT were slightly related with older age and lower injected activity. No significant influence was found for the parameters of tumor histology and stage, lymph node involvement and the time gap between injection and imaging. CONCLUSIONS Venous drainage as indicated by bone marrow uptake is the most important factor associated with scintigraphic SLN detection failure. Moreover, high peritoneal and abdominal activity was also associated with detection failure. Thus, meticulous application of the radiotracer is crucial in EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samine Sahbai
- Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 14, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Christian la Fougère
- Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 14, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Brucker
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Helmut Dittmann
- Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 14, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pericervical Injection of 99mTc-Nanocolloid Is Superior to Peritumoral Injection for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection of Endometrial Cancer in SPECT/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2017; 41:927-932. [PMID: 27749429 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000001414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Scintigraphic mapping of sentinel lymph node (SLN) is increasingly performed in patients with endometrial carcinoma although its routine clinical use is still under investigation. The purpose of this study was to compare preoperative SLN detection by means of SPECT/CT using pericervical (PC) versus hysteroscopic peritumoral (PT) injection. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred forty consecutive patients with endometrial carcinoma who underwent surgery and preoperative SLN SPECT/CT with Tc-nanocolloid were included. Seventy women received hysteroscopic injection at 3 PT sites, and 70 women received PC injection at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-o'clock positions. Each patient underwent SPECT/CT followed by modified radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy on the day after. Histopathological results were collected for validation. RESULTS Three hundred thirty-four SLNs were detected by SPECT/CT in 106 patients (mean, 3.15; range, 1-9). The detection rate after PC nanocolloid injection was 83% versus 69% after PT injection (Pearson χ test, P = 0.049). However, PT application resulted in a higher rate of para-aortic SLNs (PC: 60% vs PT: 38% of positive scans, P = 0.02). SPECT/CT yielded an overall sensitivity of 70% for the SLN detection in women with lymph node metastases with 3 false-negative cases. Failure to detect SLN was mostly associated with uptake in the reticuloendothelial system (liver, spleen, and bone marrow) or peritoneal diffusion in both cohorts. Negative scans after PT application often showed a minor to even failing injection depot. CONCLUSIONS Pericervical injection leads to a significantly better detection rate of SLN on SPECT/CT while reducing invasiveness of the injection procedure. Failure to detect SLN seems to be associated with major venous drainage.
Collapse
|
17
|
Smith B, Backes F. The role of sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial and cervical cancer. J Surg Oncol 2015; 112:753-60. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.24022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Accepted: 08/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Blair Smith
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Ohio State University; Columbus Ohio
| | - Floor Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Ohio State University; Columbus Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Factors associated with successful bilateral sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 138:542-7. [PMID: 26095896 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2015] [Revised: 06/15/2015] [Accepted: 06/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As our understanding of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for endometrial cancer (EC) evolves, tailoring the technique to individual patients at high risk for failed mapping may result in a higher rate of successful bilateral mapping (SBM). The study objective is to identify patient, tumor, and surgeon factors associated with successful SBM in patients with EC and complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH). METHODS From September 2012 to November 2014, women with EC or CAH underwent SLN mapping via cervical injection followed by robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RA-TLH) at a tertiary care academic center. Completion lymphadenectomy and ultrastaging were performed according to an institutional protocol. Patient demographics, tumor and surgeon/intraoperative variables were prospectively collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed evaluating factors known or hypothesized to impact the rate of successful lymphatic mapping. RESULTS RA-TLH and SLN mapping was performed in 111 women; 93 had EC and 18 had CAH. Eighty women had low grade and 31 had high grade disease. Overall, at least one SLN was identified in 85.6% of patients with SBM in 62.2% of patients. Dye choice (indocyanine green versus isosulfan blue), odds ratio (OR: 4.5), body mass index (OR: 0.95), and clinically enlarged lymph nodes (OR: 0.24) were associated with SBM rate on multivariate analyses. The use of indocyanine green dye was particularly beneficial in patients with a body mass index greater than 30. CONCLUSION Injection dye, BMI, and clinically enlarged lymph nodes are important considerations when performing sentinel lymph node mapping for EC.
Collapse
|