Preoperative carboplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab in triple-negative breast cancer: final results of the phase II Ca.Pa.Be study

Neoadjuvant approach as a platform for treatment personalization: focus on HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer

The neoadjuvant setting provides unquestionable clinical benefits for high-risk breast cancer (BC) patients, mainly in terms of expansion of locoregional treatment options and prognostic stratification. Additionally, it is also emerging as a strategical tool in the research field. In the present review, by focusing on HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes, we examined the role of the neoadjuvant setting as a research platform to facilitate and rationalize the placement of escalation strategies, promote the adoption of biomarker-driven approaches for the investigation of de-escalated treatments, and foster the conduction of comprehensive translational analyses, thus ultimately aiming at pursuing treatment personalization. The solid prognostic role of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy, and its use as a surrogate endpoint to accelerate the drug approval process were discussed. In this context, available data on escalated treatment strategies capable of enhancing pathologic complete response (pCR) rate or improving prognosis of patients with residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant treatment, were comprehensively reviewed. We also summarized evidence regarding the possibility of obtaining pCR with de-escalated strategies, with particular emphasis on the role of biomarker-driven approaches for patient selection. Pitfalls of the dichotomy of pCR/RD were also deepened, and data on alternative/complementary biomarkers with a possible clinical relevance in this regard were reviewed.

An Orally Available Tubulin Inhibitor, VERU-111, Suppresses Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Tumor Growth and Metastasis and Bypasses Taxane Resistance

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 15% of breast cancer cases in the United States. TNBC has poorer overall prognosis relative to other molecular subtypes due to rapid onset of drug resistance to conventional chemotherapies and increased risk of visceral metastases. Taxanes like paclitaxel are standard chemotherapies that stabilize microtubules, but their clinical efficacy is often limited by drug resistance and neurotoxicities. We evaluated the preclinical efficacy of a novel, potent, and orally bioavailable tubulin inhibitor, VERU-111, in TNBC models. VERU-111 showed potent cytotoxicity against TNBC cell lines, inducing apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest in a concentration-dependent manner. VERU-111 also efficiently inhibited colony formation, cell migration, and invasion. Orally administered VERU-111 inhibited MDA-MB-231 xenograft growth in a dose-dependent manner, with similar efficacies to paclitaxel, but without acute toxicity. VERU-111 significantly reduced metastases originating from the mammary fat pad into lung, liver, and kidney metastasis in an experimental metastasis model. Moreover, VERU-111, but not paclitaxel, suppressed growth of luciferase-labeled, taxane-resistant, patient-derived metastatic TNBC tumors. In this model, VERU-111 repressed growth of preestablished axillary lymph node metastases and lung, bone, and liver metastases at study endpoint, whereas paclitaxel enhanced liver metastases relative to vehicle controls. Collectively, these studies strongly suggest that VERU-111 is not only a potent inhibitor of aggressive TNBC phenotypes, but it is also efficacious in a taxane-resistant model of metastatic TNBC. Thus, VERU-111 is a promising new generation of tubulin inhibitor for the treatment of TNBC and may be effective in patients who progress on taxanes.Results presented in this study demonstrate the efficacy of VERU-111 in vivo and provide strong rationale for future development of VERU-111 as an effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

Outcome for triple negative breast cancer in a retrospective cohort with an emphasis on response to platinum-based neoadjuvant therapy

Purpose

The rate of pathological complete response (pCR) for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is increased when carboplatin is added to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, while phase III trial data showing a survival benefit are awaited, carboplatin is not yet standard-of-care for TNBC. The aim of this study was to examine the rate of pCR and the outcome for those treated with carboplatin and to examine the predictors of response to therapy.

Methods

The retrospective series comprised 333 consecutive patients with TNBC (median follow-up time, 43 months). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 51% (n = 168) of patients and 29% (n = 97) received anthracycline–taxane NACT with carboplatin given to 9% (n = 31) of patients.

Results

Overall, 25% (n = 78) of patients experienced a breast cancer recurrence and 22% (n = 68) died from disease. A pCR breast and pCR breast/axilla was more common in those who received carboplatin (n = 18, 58% and n = 17, 55%, respectively) compared those who did not (n = 23, 36% and n = 18, 28%, respectively) (p = 0.041 and p = 0.011, respectively). By multivariable analysis, carboplatin and high tumor grade were independent predictors of pCR breast/axilla (OR_non-pCR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.06–0.54; p = 0.002; and OR_non-pCR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01–0.27; p < 0.001, respectively). pCR breast/axilla was an independent predictor of DFS (HR_non-pCR=6.23; 95% CI 1.36–28.50; p = 0.018), metastasis-free survival (HR_non-pCR = 5.08; 95% CI 1.09–23.65; p = 0.038) and BCSS (HR_non-pCR = 8.52; 95% CI 1.09–66.64; p = 0.041).

Conclusion

Carboplatin therapy and high tumor grade are associated with a significant increase in the rate of pCR, which is an independent predictor of outcome. These data support the use of carboplatin in NACT for TNBC, while results from phase III studies are awaited.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-5066-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in luminal breast cancer: will tumour shrinkage patterns affect its efficacy of evaluating the pathological response?

AIM

To determine which region of interest (ROI) placement method of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement has the best performance for predicting pathological complete response (PCR) at two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) according to different tumour shrinkage patterns of luminal breast cancer and to assess the evaluative accuracy of ADC value combined with other clinicopathological indicators.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-one patients who underwent NAC for histopathologically confirmed breast cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study. The ADC values of different shrinkage patterns (concentric shrinkage, nest or dendritic shrinkage, and mixed shrinkage) for tumours shown by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were measured independently using three ROI placement methods (single-round, three-round, and freehand). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the interobserver variability in the ADC values. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of PCR.

RESULTS

The best placement method found was single-round ROI in all the patients (AUC=0.863). When analysed separately, the effectiveness results differed: the single-round method was optimal for concentrically shrinking tumours (AUC=0.970); the freehand method was optimal for nest or dendritically shrinking tumours (AUC=0.714); and the three-round method was optimal for mixed shrinking tumours (AUC=0.975). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that oestrogen receptor (ER), ΔADC% and tumour diameter reduction (ΔD%) were independent factors in evaluating the PCR.

CONCLUSION

The methods for measuring ADC values vary across different shrinkage patterns of luminal tumours. ΔADC%, ER and ΔD% were independent factors for evaluating the PCR.

Neoadjuvant treatments in triple-negative breast cancer patients: where we are now and where we are going

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains the poorest-prognosis breast cancer (BC) subtype. Gene expression profiling has identified at least six different triple-negative subtypes with different biology and sensitivity to therapies. The heterogeneous nature of TN tumors may justify the difficulty in treating this BC subtype. Several targeted agents have been investigated in clinical trials without demonstrating a clear survival benefit. Therefore, systemic chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of current clinical practice. Improving the knowledge of tumor biology is mandatory for patient management. In stages II and III, neoadjuvant systemic treatment is an effective option of care. The achievement of a pathological complete response represents an optimal surrogate for survival outcome as well as a test for tumor drug sensitivity. In this review, we provide a brief description of the main predictive biomarkers for tumor response to systemic treatment. Moreover, we review the treatment strategies investigated for TNBCs in neoadjuvant settings focusing on experimental drugs such as immunotherapy and poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitors that hold promise in the treatment of this aggressive disease. Therefore, the management of TNBC represents an urgent, current, unmet need in daily clinical practice. A key recommendation is to design biology-driven clinical trials wherein TNBC patients may be treated on the basis of tumor molecular profile.

Antitumor activity and safety profile of weekly carboplatin plus paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: a ten-year, monocentric, retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Taxanes are a mainstay in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Combination chemotherapy, including platinum-taxens doublets, can improve tumor responses and progression-free survival (PFS), but is associated with more toxicities and an uncertain benefit in terms of overall survival (OS).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on 274 consecutive patients with mBC treated at the Division of Medical Oncology of Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy, during the decade 2007-2016 with the combination of carboplatin AUC 2 plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m², both given on days 1 and 8 in every 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

264 patients were evaluable for treatment safety and activity. The objective response rate (ORR) was 44.7%. Median PFS and OS were 8.6 and 23.7 months, respectively. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients had significantly lower PFS and OS times compared to other biology groups. At multivariable analysis, previous exposure to taxanes, HR-positive HER2-negative biology, a higher number of metastatic sites, and de novo metastatic disease at diagnosis were associated with reduced PFS, while receiving maintenance therapy correlated with improved PFS. Overall, the treatment was quite well tolerated, with 10.2% of patients discontinuing one or both drugs because of adverse events (AEs). G3-G4 neutropenia occurred in 16.8% of patients, while the incidence of febrile neutropenia was 2.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen is active and well tolerated in mBC treatment. Prospective studies should be conducted to compare its efficacy and tolerability with standard single-agent paclitaxel or docetaxel treatment schedules, as well as with more recent combination regimens.

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in oncological clinical trials: Current techniques and standardization challenges

Radiological imaging plays an important role in oncological trials to provide imaging biomarkers for disease staging, stratifying patients, defining dose setting, and evaluating the safety and efficacy of new candidate drugs and innovative treatment. This paper reviews the techniques of most commonly used quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) biomarkers (dynamic contrast enhanced, dynamic susceptibility contrast, and diffusion weighted imaging) and their applications in oncological trials. Challenges of incorporating qMRI biomarkers in oncological trials are discussed including understanding biological mechanisms revealed by MRI biomarkers, consideration of rigorous trial design and standardized implementation of qMRI protocols.

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: Challenges and uncertainties

The management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains a major clinical issue, despite progress achieved in diagnosis and therapy. Preoperative or neoadjuvant therapy has gained interest since breast cancer has been regarded as a systemic disease. Comparing adjuvant versus neoadjuvant treatment, the neoadjuvant approach offers the advantage of downstaging the disease and testing the efficacy of therapy administered to patients. A large number of clinical trials have attempted to define the optimal neoadjuvant treatment, but little attention has been paid to the sequence of chemotherapy. Moreover, the integration of antibodies against Human Epidermal Receptor-2 (HER-2) and other biological therapies that may improve the long-term control of breast cancer patients, have a special clinical interest. In this review, we will discuss these topics attempting to answer the questions why, when and which regimen to use for patients with LABC. Especially, the introduction of the platina derivatives in neoadjuvant trials with their exceptional high pathological complete response rates are challenging to rethink the optimal treatment options in early and locally advanced breast cancer.

Bevacizumab Addition in Neoadjuvant Treatment Increases the Pathological Complete Response Rates in Patients with HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer Especially Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy is administered to breast cancer patients as an induction process before surgery or radiotherapy to reduce tumor size. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) negative breast cancer lacks effective standard target therapy. Bevacizumab has a controversial role in the treatment of breast cancer and we conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the value of adding bevacizumab in neoadjuvant regimen.

Methods

Potentially eligible studies were retrieved using PubMed, EMBASE and Medline. Clinical characteristics of patients and statistical data with pathological complete response (pCR) data were collected. Then a meta-analysis model was established to investigate the correlation between administration of bevacizumab in neoadjuvant therapy and pCR rates in HER-2 negative breast cancer.

Results

Seven eligible studies and 5408 patients were yielded. The pCR rates for “breast” or “breast plus lymph node” were similar. In subgroup analysis, we emphasized on patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the criterion of “lesions in breast” the pooled ORs was 1.55 [1.29, 1.86], P<0.00001 and regarding to the evaluation criterion of “lesions in breast and lymph nodes”, the pooled ORs was 1.48 [1.23, 1.78], P<0.0001, in favor of bevacizumab administration.

Conclusion

According to our pooled results, we finally find that bevacizumab addition as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy component, for induction use with limited cycle to improve the pCR rates and patients may avoid long-term adverse event and long-term invalid survival improvement. Especially in subgroup analysis, pCR rates could be improved significantly and physicians could consider bevacizumab with caution. As patients could avoid the adverse event caused by long-term using of bevacizumab, long-term quality of life improvement may be achieved, especially in TNBC.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for oncology drug development

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a promising tool for evaluating tumor vascularity, as it can provide vasculature-derived, functional, and quantitative parameters. To implement DCE-MRI parameters as biomarkers for monitoring the effect of antiangiogenic or vascular-disrupting treatment, two crucial elements of surrogate endpoint, ie, validation and qualification, should be satisfied. Although early studies have shown the accuracy and reliability of DCE-MRI parameters for evaluating treatment-driven vascular alterations, there have been an increasing number of studies demonstrating the limitations of DCE-MRI parameters as surrogate endpoints. Therefore, in order to improve the application of DCE-MRI parameters in drug development, it is necessary to establish a standardized evaluation method and to determine the correct therapeutics-oriented meaning of individual DCE-MRI parameter. In this regard, this article describes the biophysical background and data acquisition/analysis techniques of DCE-MRI while focusing on the validation and qualification issues. Specifically, the causes of disagreement and confusion encountered in the preclinical and clinical trials using DCE-MRI are presented in detail. Finally, considering these limitations, we present potential strategies to optimize implementation of DCE-MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:251-264.