Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Influence of the Volume Effect Beyond Mortality

Readmissions Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Experience From a Tertiary Care Center in India

Background An enhanced recovery approach in surgery helps early postoperative discharge. With the decreasing trend of morbidity and mortality in recent times in patients undergoing complex procedures such as pancreaticoduodenectomy, readmissions are the next major concern. The causes and outcomes of these readmissions should be investigated for their impact on patient care and prevention. Methodology A total of 997 patients discharged after pancreaticoduodenectomy from a tertiary care center in northern India, between 1989 and 2021, were studied retrospectively to assess the readmission rate for sequelae after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The causes, interventions, outcomes, and predictive factors were studied. Results A total of 103 (10.3%) patients required readmission for sequelae after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 52 (50.4%) patients required interventions. The most common cause for readmission in our study was intra-abdominal collection (n = 23, 22.3%). Of these 103 patients, 63 (61.2%) had good outcomes, 36 (34.9%) had fair outcomes, and four (3.9%) had bad outcomes. Overall, 53 (51.5%) of 103 patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge, most commonly with intra-abdominal collection (16 of 53, 30.1%). Of these 53 patients, 22 (41.5%) required interventions, 34 (64.1%) had good outcomes, and 27 (50.9%) were readmitted within seven days of discharge. Of these 27 patients, 12 (44.4%) required interventions, with 24 (88.8%) experiencing good outcomes. Of the 103 patients, 12 (11.6%) were readmitted between 31 and 90 days, mostly due to external stent, T-tube, or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage-related problems. Overall, 38 (36.9%) of 103 patients were readmitted after 90 days, mostly with incisional hernia and strictured hepaticojejunostomy. Of these 38 patients, 26 (68.4%) required intervention, and 23 (60.5%) had good outcomes. A previous history of cholangitis (odds ratio (OR) = 1.771, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.17-2.67, p = 0.007), postoperative fever (OR = 1.628, 95% CI = 1.081-2.452, p = 0.02), wound infection (OR = 2.011, 95% CI = 1.332-3.035, p = 0.001), and wound dehiscence (OR = 2.136, 95% CI = 1.333-3.423, p = 0.002) predicted readmission on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed a previous history of cholangitis (OR = 1.755, CI = 1.158-2.659, p = 0.008) and wound infection (OR = 1.995, 95% CI = 1.320-2.690, p = 0.001) as factors independently predicting readmission. Conclusions Readmitted patients have high intervention rates and good recovery rates. Readmissions should not be considered a scale for poor healthcare. Patient education, proper management of postoperative complications, and a properly designed discharge care system can help tackle this problem.

Study of Risk Factors for Readmission After Pancreatectomy for Cancer: Analysis of Nationwide Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors associated with readmission after pancreatectomy for cancer and to assess their impact on the 1-year mortality in a French multicentric population.

BACKGROUND

Pancreatectomy is a complex procedure with high morbidity that increases the length of hospital stay and jeopardizes survival. Hospital readmissions lead to increased health system costs, making this a topic of great interest.

METHODS

Data collected from patients who underwent pancreatectomy for cancer between 2011 and 2019 were extracted from a French national medico-administrative database. A descriptive analysis was conducted to evaluate the association of baseline variables, including age, sex, liver-related comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor localization, and use of neoadjuvant therapy, along with hospital type and volume, with readmission status. Centers were divided into low and high volumes according to the cutoff of 26 cases/year. Logistic regression models were developed to determine whether the identified bivariate associations persisted after adjusting for the patient characteristics. The mortality rates during readmission and at 1 year postoperatively were also determined.

RESULTS

Of 22,935 patients who underwent pancreatectomy, 9129 (39.3%) were readmitted within 6 months. Readmission rates by year did not vary over the study period, and mean readmissions occurred within 20 days after discharge. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 1.12], age >70 years (OR = 1.16), comorbidities (OR = 1.21), distal pancreatectomy (OR = 1.11), and major postoperative complications (OR = 1.37) were predictors of readmission. Interestingly, readmission and surgery in low-volume centers increased the risk of death at 1 year by a factor of 2.15 [(2.01-2.31), P < 0.001] and 1.31 [(1.17-1.47), P < 0.001], respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission after pancreatectomy for cancer is high with an increased rate of 1-year mortality.

Racial and Socioeconomic Differences and Surgical Outcomes in Pancreaticoduodenectomy Patients: A Systematic Review of High- Versus Low-Volume Hospitals in the United States

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is associated with better outcomes in high-volume hospitals. However, it is unknown whether and to what extent the improved performance of high-volume hospitals may be associated with racial and socioeconomic factors, which have been shown to impact operative and postoperative outcomes in major surgeries. This review aims to identify the differences in racial and socioeconomic characteristics of patients who underwent PD surgery in high- and low-volume hospitals.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science were systematically searched between May 1, 2023 and May 7, 2023 without any time restriction on publication date. Studies that were conducted in the United States and had a direct comparison between high- and low-volume hospitals were included.

RESULTS

A total of 30 observational studies were included. When racial proportions were compared by hospital volume, thirteen studies reported that compared to high-volume hospitals, a higher percentage of racial minorities underwent PD in low-volume hospitals. Disparities in traveling distance, education levels, and median income at baseline between high- and low-volume hospitals were reported by four, three, and two studies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A racial difference at baseline between high- and low-volume hospitals was observed. Socioeconomic factors were less frequently included in existing literature. Future studies are needed to understand the socioeconomic differences between patients receiving PD surgery in high- and low-volume hospitals.

Do Weekend Discharges Impact Readmission Rate in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Weekend readmissions have been previously associated with increased mortality after pancreatic resection, but the effect of weekend discharge is less understood. In this study, we aim to determine the impact of weekend discharges on 30-day readmission rate after pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

All patients who underwent pancreatic surgery at a single, high-volume institution between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a targeted, institutional ACS-NSQIP database. Patients who died prior to discharge were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between readmission and weekend discharge.

RESULTS

Out of 2042 patients who underwent pancreatectomy, 418 patients (20.5%) were discharged on the weekend. Weekend discharge was associated with fewer Whipple surgeries, fewer open surgical approaches, and shorter operative time. Patients discharged on the weekend were also less likely to have had postoperative complications such as delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (6.7% vs 12.6%, p < 0.01) and were more frequently discharged to home (91.1% vs. 85.3%, p < 0.01). Thirty-day readmission rate was almost identical between groups (14.8% vs 14.8%, p = 0.997). On multivariable analysis, 30-day readmission was independently associated with DGE (OR (95% CI): 3.48 (2.31-5.23), p < 0.01), postoperative pancreatic fistula (3.36 (2.34-4.83), p < 0.01), myocardial infarction, and perioperative blood transfusion, but not weekend discharge (1.02 (0.72-1.43), p = 0.93). Readmission rate also did not differ significantly when including Friday discharges in the weekend group (15.2% vs 14.6%, p = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

With careful clinical decision making, patients may safely be discharged on the weekend after pancreatic surgery without increasing 30-day readmission rate.

Neoadjuvant therapy at local versus outside institutions does not adversely impact surgical timing or long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although high-volume centers are known to have better surgical outcomes, patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma often receive chemotherapy at treatment centers closer to home. This study aimed to determine whether treatment site of neoadjuvant therapy relative to surgery location impacts surgical timing and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

All patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent oncologic resection at a single, high-volume institution between January 2016 and February 2020 and had neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery were queried from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were sorted based on location of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients were included in the study. Seventy-four (41.3%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the same institution as their surgery (group A), 20 (11.2%) received chemotherapy outside of their surgical institution but within the same hospital/healthcare system (group B), and 85 (47.5%) received chemotherapy at an outside location (group C). The time from completion of neoadjuvant therapy to surgery was not significantly different between groups (A vs B vs C median [interquartile range]: 34.5 [14] vs 41.5 [24] vs 36 [22] days, P = .08). Thirty-day readmission rate was lower in group A (n (%): 1 (1.4%) vs 2 (10.0%) vs 11 (12.9%), P = .02). However, the 90-day mortality and overall survival did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients may receive neoadjuvant therapy at local centers without impacting surgical scheduling. Although these patients may experience higher postoperative readmission rates, perioperative mortality and long-term survival are not adversely affected by location of chemotherapy. Multidisciplinary care can be effectively practiced in different locations without affecting overall outcomes in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Birmingham score validation

BACKGROUND

The Birmingham score predicts the risk of hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed to validate the risk score in a different healthcare cohort.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2021, 301 patients underwent PD. The Birmingham score was applied to 276 patients. Postoperative deceased patients (n = 7) or those requiring a completion of pancreatectomy (n = 18) were excluded.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (17%) patients were readmitted after a median delay of 9 (range 1-49) days and stayed for 5 (range 1-27) days; 4 (8.5%) died during the hospital stay. The leading cause of readmission was a septic condition (53%), mostly resolved by medical treatment (77%). A multivariate analysis identified the occurrence of a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, the score criteria, and the score itself as independent factors favouring readmission. Readmission rates in patients with low [n = 97 (35%)], intermediate [n = 98 (36%)], and high [n = 81 (29%)] scores were 5%, 17%, and 31%, respectively (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the relevance and robustness of the Birmingham risk score. Patients with a high risk of readmission after PD, identified based on the score, were discharged to a partnership medical centre close to the pancreatic centre to plan readmission and avoid futile unplanned hospitalisation.

Complications of modern pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the past decades, the perioperative management of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has undergone major changes worldwide. This review aimed to systematically determine the burden of complications of PD performed in the last 10 years.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review was conducted in PubMed for randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting postoperative complications in at least 100 PDs from January 2010 to April 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool for randomized studies and the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). Pooled complication rates were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS

A total of 20 randomized and 49 observational studies reporting 63 229 PDs were reviewed. Mean MINORS score showed a high risk of bias in non-randomized studies, while one quarter of the randomized studies were assessed to have high risk of bias. Pooled incidences of 30-day mortality, overall complications and serious complications were 1.7% (95% CI: 0.9%-2.9%; I² = 95.4%), 54.7% (95% CI: 46.4%-62.8%; I² = 99.4%) and 25.5% (95% CI: 21.8%-29.4%; I²= 92.9%), respectively. Clinically-relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk was 14.3% (95% CI: 12.4%-16.3%; I² = 92.0%) and mean length of stay was 14.8 days (95% CI: 13.6-16.1; I² = 99.3%). Meta-regression partially attributed the observed heterogeneity to the country of origin of the study, the study design and the American Society of Anesthesiologists class.

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled complication rates estimated in this study may be used to counsel patients scheduled to undergo a PD and to set benchmarks against which centers can audit their practice. However, cautious interpretation is necessary due to substantial heterogeneity.

Does CT scanning after pancreatoduodenectomy reduce readmission rates: an analysis of 900 resections at a high-volume center

BACKGROUND

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains associated with significant complication and readmission rates. Infection constitutes a significant proportion of morbidity. We aim to evaluate whether CT scans performed prior to discharge for suspected infection prevents readmission.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing PD at a tertiary referral center from 2010 to 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 982 patients underwent PD: 74% had no clinical infection at the index admission. Of the non-infected patients, 59% exhibited leukocytosis, 27% underwent a CT scan, and 33.6% were readmitted. Of the non-infected patients, 148 (20.3%) experienced major complications, and this was the strongest predictor of readmission (OR: 10.5, [95% CI: 6.5-17], p = 0.0001). In the non-infected patients who had major complications, CT scanning was predictive of lower risk of readmission (OR: 0.38, [95% CI: 0.17-0.83], p = 0.015). Leukocytosis was also found to be predictive of lower risk of readmission (OR: 0.42, [95% CI: 0.18-0.98], p = 0.044). These findings did not hold true for those who had yet to experience major complications on their index admission.

CONCLUSION

CT scanning without evidence of infection was associated with reduction of readmission in the cohort with major complications and showed a trend towards preventing readmission in the overall cohort. Development of clinical algorithms to maximize the utility of this test is warranted.

Contemporary outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and precancerous cystic lesions

BACKGROUND

The decision to undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and precancerous lesions has historically relied on outcomes data from operations for cancer. We aimed to describe risks for these specific patients and identify the highest risk groups.

METHODS

The ACS-NSQIP pancreatic targeted data was queried for pancreaticoduodenectomies for benign and pre-cancerous neoplasms from 2014 to 2018. Baseline characteristics, operative techniques and outcomes were examined. Multivariate regression was performed to identify predictors of major complications.

RESULTS

748 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for (n = 541,72.3%) IPMN, (n = 87,11.6%) MCN, (n = 78,10.4%) serous cystadenoma, and (n = 42,5.6%) solid pseudopapillary neoplasm. Median LOS was 8 days. Major complications (n = 135,18.0%), non-home discharges (n = 83,11.1%) and readmissions (n = 153,20.5%) occurred frequently. In patients ≥ 80 years of age (n = 37), major complications (n = 11,29.7%) and non-home discharge (n = 9,24.3%) were quite common. 5-item modified frailty index ≥ 0.4 (OR 1.84,95%CI 1.06-3.19,p = 0.030), Male sex (OR 1.729,95%CI 1.152-2.595,p = 0.008), Age ≥ 65 (OR 1.63,95%CI 1.05-2.54,p = 0.29) and African-American race (OR 2.50,95%CI 1.22-5.16,p = 0.013) were independent predictors of major morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreaticoduodenectomies in this setting have high rates of major complications. Morbidity extends beyond the index hospitalization, with frequent readmission and non-home discharge. Patient specific factors, rather than technical or disease factors predicted outcomes. In certain patients, particularly those older than 80, the morbidity of this operation may exceed the cancer prevention benefits.

The impact of upper gastrointestinal surgical volume on short term pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the SEER-Medicare population

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at low volume PD hospitals with high volume for other complex operations have comparable outcomes to high volume PD centers. We evaluated the impact of upper gastrointestinal operations (UGI) hospital volume on the outcomes of elderly, high risk patients undergoing PD.

METHODS

Patients >65 years old who underwent PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified from SEER-Medicare (2008-2015). Four volume cohorts were created using PD tertiles and UGI median: low (1st tertile PD), mixed-low (2nd tertile PD, low UGI), mixed-high (2nd tertile PD, high UGI) and high (3rd tertile PD). Multivariable logistic and negative binomial regression assessed short-term complications.

RESULTS

In total, 2717 patients were identified with a median age of 74.5 years. Patients treated at low, mixed-low and mixed-high volume hospitals, versus high volume, had higher risk of short-term complications, including major complications (low: OR 1.441, 95%CI 1.165-1.783; mixed-low: OR 1.374, 95%CI 1.085-1.740; mixed-high: OR 1.418, 95%CI 1.098-1.832) and 90-day mortality (low: OR 2.16, 95%CI 1.454-3.209; mixed-low: OR 2.068, 95%CI 1.347-3.175; mixed-high: OR 1.96, 95%CI 1.245-3.086).

CONCLUSION

Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who are older and more medically complex benefit from undergoing surgery at high volume PD centers, independent of the operative experience of that center.

Does hospital volume affect outcomes after abdominal cancer surgery: an analysis of Swiss health insurance claims data

Background

Medical treatment quality has been shown to be better in high volume than in low volume hospitals. However, this relationship has not yet been confirmed in abdominal cancer in Switzerland and is relevant for referral of patients and healthcare planning. Thus, the present study investigates the association between hospital volumes for surgical resections of colon, gastric, rectal, and pancreatic carcinomas and outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective analysis is based on anonymized claims data of patients with mandatory health insurance at Helsana Group, a leading health insurance in Switzerland. Outcome parameters were length of hospital stay, mortality and cost during the inpatient stay as well as at 1-year follow-up. Hospital volume information was derived from the Quality Indicators dataset provided by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health. The impact of hospital volume on the different treatment outcomes was statistically tested using generalized estimating equations (GEE) models, taking into account the non-independence of observations from the same hospital.

Results

The studies included 2′859 resections in patients aged 18 years and older who were hospitalized for abdominal cancer surgery between 2014 and 2018. Colon resections were the most common procedures (n = 1′690), followed by rectal resections (n = 709). For rectal, colon and pancreatic resections, an increase in the mean number of interventions per hospital and a reduction of low volume hospitals could be observed. For the relationship between hospital volume and outcomes, we did not observe a clear dose-response relationship, as no significantly better outcomes were observed in the higher-volume category than in the lower-volume category. Even though a positive “routine effect” cannot be excluded, our results suggest that even hospitals with low volumes are able to achieve comparable treatment outcomes to larger hospitals.

Conclusion

In summary, this study increases transparency on the relationship between hospital volume and treatment success. It shows that simple measures such as defining a minimum number of procedures only might not lead to the intended effects if other factors such as infrastructure, the operating team or aggregation level of the available data are not taken into account.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07513-5.

Improvement in Surgical Quality Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy With Increasing Case Volume in a Rural Hospital

BACKGROUND

The literature is replete with studies that define the nexus of quantity and quality in complex surgical operations. These observations have heralded a call for centralization of care to high-volume centers. The purpose of this study was to chronicle improvements in quality associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) as a rural hospital matures from a low- to very high-volume center.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective pancreatic surgery database was undertaken from July 2007 to June 2020. Annual periods were characterized as low (≤12/year), high (13-29/year), and very high volume (≥30/year). Data for the following quality benchmarks were aggregated and compared: length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, 30-day mortality, and 1- and 3-year survival. A subgroup analysis was undertaken in those patients undergoing PD for adenocarcinoma detailing margin status and number of lymph nodes harvested. Outcomes were compared using the Fisher's exact and Student's t-test.

RESULTS

375 PD were completed over the 13-year period; 62.1% were undertaken for ductal adenocarcinoma. There was a significant decrease in LOS and 30-day readmissions as the institution matured toward very high volume. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality, 1- and 3-year survival, or margin negativity rates associated with volume. Extent of lymph node harvest significantly improved as institutional experience increased.

DISCUSSION

Our pancreatic surgery program matured rapidly from low to very high volume with institutional commitment and dedicated resources. As the institution matured, operational efficiencies and surgical quality improved. Not unexpectedly, biology trumped volume as reflected in 1- and 3-year survival rates.

In-hospital survival after pancreatoduodenectomy is greater in high-volume hospitals versus lower-volume hospitals: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Variation in cut-off values for what is considered a high volume (HV) hospital has made assessments of volume-outcome relationships for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) challenging. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing in-hospital mortality after PD in hospitals above and below HV thresholds of various cut-off values.

METHOD

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to 4 January 2021 for studies comparing in-hospital mortality after PD in hospitals above and below defined HV thresholds. After data extraction, risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis, including meta-regressions. Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021224432.

RESULTS

From 1855 records, 17 observational studies of moderate quality were included. Median HV cut-off was 25 PDs/year (IQR: 20-32). Overall relative risk of in-hospital mortality was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.45), that is, 63% less in HV hospitals. All subgroup analyses found an in-hospital survival benefit in performing PDs at HV hospitals. Meta-regressions from included studies found no statistically significant associations between relative risk of in-hospital mortality and region (USA vs. non-USA; p = 0.396); or 25th percentile (p = 0.231), median (p = 0.822) or 75th percentile (p = 0.469) HV cut-off values. Significant inverse relationships were found between PD hospital volume and other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In-hospital survival was significantly greater for patients undergoing PDs at HV hospitals, regardless of HV cut-off value or region. Future research is required to investigate regions where low-volume centres have specialized PD infrastructure and the potential impact on mortality.

Centralisation of Pancreatoduodenectomy in India: Where Do We Stand?

BACKGROUND

The volume-outcome relationship dictates that high-volume centres lead to improved patient outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). We conducted a retrospective review to fathom the situation in India for PD and whether referral to high-volume centres would make a positive impact.

METHOD

A systematic literature search in MEDLINE was performed, and all articles published from Indian centres from 01.03.2008 to 30.11.2019 were scrutinised. Any series with less than 20 patients, case reports, abstracts, unpublished data and personal communications were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 36 unique series including 6226 patients from 24 institutes across India were identified. Amongst the 24 institutes, 2 institutes reported less than 10 cases/year, 11 reported 10-25 cases/year and 11 reported ≥26 cases/year. Overall perioperative morbidity was 42.4%, 43.4% and 41% for centres doing <10, 10-25 and ≥26 cases/year, respectively. Operative mortality also improved with increasing number of cases/year (5.1% vs. 6.6% vs. 3.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

With increasing volume of cases per year, trend towards improved PD outcomes is observed. To optimise the use of healthcare facilities, it would be pragmatic to consider building an organised referral system for complex surgeries to deliver unsurpassed patient care with maximum utilisation of the available healthcare infrastructure.

Composite Length of Stay, An Outcome Measure of Postoperative and Readmission Length of Stays in Pancreatoduodenectomy

PURPOSE

Postoperative length of stay (PLOS) and readmission rate are pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) outcome measures, which are reported individually but may be interrelated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how well a composite length of stay measure (CLOS) that included PLOS and readmission length of stay describes outcomes. To do so, we evaluated how well CLOS correlated to postoperative complications absolutely and compared to PLOS.

METHODS

A total of 668 PDs performed between 2011 and 2018 were evaluated. CLOS was calculated from PLOS and readmission length of stay. Complication severity was judged by the Modified Accordion Grading System (MAGS). Multinomial logistical regression models (MLRM) were used to investigate the relationship between either PLOS or CLOS and complications. Multilevel and pairwise area under curves (AUC) using SAS macro %MultAUC were provided for both models.

RESULTS

A total of 432 of 668 patients (65%) developed complications. One hundred seventy-seven patients (27%) were readmitted. Mean PLOS was 10.2 days (7.1 SD) and mean CLOS was 12.3 days (10.1 SD). PLOS and CLOS both were correlated linearly to MAGS grade. Spearman correlation coefficient for CLOS vs. MAGS of 0.68 was higher than that of 0.49 for PLOS vs. MAGS. Multilevel AUC from MLRM using PLOS was 0.66, but multilevel AUC from MLRM using CLOS was 0.71.

DISCUSSION

CLOS provides an accurate estimate of hospital day utilization per patient for PD, reflecting not only the basal hospital recovery time for PD but the added time needed because of readmissions due to complications. It is tightly correlated to number and severity of postoperative complications.

Time Spent Away from Home in the Year Following High-Risk Cancer Surgery in Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

To understand where older adults spend time (at home, in the hospital, or in a nursing home) in the year following high-risk cancer surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Medicare beneficiaries using data from Medicare Inpatient claims to ascertain hospital days and the Minimum Data Set to ascertain nursing home days.

PARTICIPANTS

Beneficiaries who underwent high-risk cancer surgery (cystectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, gastrectomy, or esophagectomy) were identified to determine cumulative time spent away from home in the year following surgery.

MEASUREMENTS

Adjusted percentages of time spent away from home (ie, days in a hospital or nursing home) were modeled for the year following surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 37 748 beneficiaries underwent high-risk cancer surgery during the study period, and 28.3% died within 1 year. Overall, beneficiaries spent 13.9 ± 26.2 days in the hospital (over 1.5 ± 2.0 hospital readmissions) and 37.2 ± 50.6 days in the nursing home (over 1.5 ± 1.0 admissions) in the year following surgery. Among beneficiaries who were alive and dead at 1 year, 18.5% and 30.1% of time was spent away from home, respectively. Beneficiaries who were initially discharged to a facility following surgery and died within 1 year spent 44.4% of their final year away from home.

CONCLUSION

Time spent away from home in the hospital and/or nursing home in the year following high-risk cancer surgery is substantial among Medicare beneficiaries. This information is crucial in counseling patients on postoperative expectations and may additionally influence preoperative decision making. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:505-510, 2020.

Perioperative blood transfusion is associated with an increased risk for post-surgical infection following pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Perioperative blood transfusion is common after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and may predispose patients to infectious complications. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between perioperative blood transfusion and the development of post-surgical infection after PD.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PD from 2014 to 2015 were identified in the NSQIP pancreas-specific database. Logistic regression analysis was used to compute adjusted odds ratios (aOR) to identify an independent association between perioperative red blood cell transfusion (within 72 h of surgery) and the development of post-operative infection after 72 h.

RESULTS

A total of 6869 patients underwent PD during this time period. Of these, 1372 (20.0%) patients received a perioperative blood transfusion. Patients receiving transfusion had a higher rate of post-operative infection (34.7% vs 26.5%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for significant covariates, perioperative transfusion was independently associated the subsequent development of any post-operative infection (aOR 1.41 [1.23-1.62], p < 0.001), including pneumonia (aOR 2.01 [1.48-2.74], p < 0.001), sepsis (aOR 1.62 [1.29-2.04], p < 0.001), and septic shock (aOR 1.92 [1.38-2.68], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is a strong independent association between perioperative blood transfusion and the development of subsequent post-operative infection following PD.

Readmissions after Pancreatic Surgery in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: Does Hospital Variation Exist for Quality Measurement?

Background

The appropriateness of using readmission rate after pancreatic surgery among pancreatic cancer patients as a quality metric to evaluate hospital performance has been widely discussed in the literature.

Objectives

The present study reported readmission rate using Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), examined the reasons and risk factors for readmissions, and evaluated the appropriateness of using it as a quality metric.

Method

We analyzed 3,619 patient discharge records in 2014. The outcome of interest was all-cause 30-day readmission. Reasons for readmission were grouped into clinical associated categories. Hierarchical regression model was used for examining the relationship between risk factors and readmission.

Results

The 30-day readmission rate was 20.95%. The most common reason for readmission was surgery-related complication. In descriptive analyses, age, certain comorbidities, number of chronic conditions, mortality risk, severity of illness, living at large metropolitan area, resident of the state where patients received initial care, postoperative complication, length of stay, discharge location, and receiving care at the hospitals in large metropolitan area were predictive of readmission. In multivariable analysis, age, depression, peripheral vascular disorder, mortality risk, and discharge location were independently associated with readmission. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.41 for hierarchical regression model.

Conclusions

Readmission after pancreatic surgery remains an important issue. Our study found the majority of variation in readmissions is accounted for by patient factors whereas there was little between hospital variation. This finding does not support the use of readmission rate after pancreatic surgery as a quality metric.

Short-term outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy in the state of Victoria: hospital resources are more important than volume

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a high-risk procedure. Australian hospitals perform a relatively low volume of PD. This study sought to gain an understanding of hospital volume and short-term outcomes of the procedure in the Australian state of Victoria.

METHODS

The Dr Foster Quality Investigator tool was used to interrogate the Victorian Admitted Episodes Database for the Australian Classification of Health Intervention code for PD (30584) from July 2010 to June 2016. The data set included patients from a peer group of 14 hospitals that included all the public hospitals performing PD during this period. Patient characteristics, inpatient mortality, 30-day readmission rates and median length of stay were reported for each de-identified hospital.

RESULTS

There were 547 PD conducted over 6 years in 10 public hospitals. The median patient age was 65 years. Inpatient mortality was 2.7%. There was a significant risk adjusted difference in mortality between principal referral and other public hospitals. Annual hospital volume ranged from 3 to 20 PD, and there was no significant relationship between mortality, readmission rates or length of stay and hospital volume.

CONCLUSION

The inpatient mortality associated with PD in Victorian public hospitals is comparable to that seen in overseas studies. While hospital volume is relatively low, there does not seem to be a relationship between volume and short-term outcomes. Variability between hospital peer groups suggests that resource availability is more important than volume. The development of a procedure specific registry would be useful to test the outcomes of this study and determine long-term PD outcomes.

Comparison of pancreatojejunostomy techniques in patients with a soft pancreas: Kakita anastomosis and Blumgart anastomosis

Background

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (PF) is the main cause of operative mortality in patients who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy. Various pancreatoenteric anastomosis techniques have been reported to minimize the postoperative PF rate. However, the optimal method remains unknown. This study was performed to clarify the impact of pancreatojejunostomy on clinically relevant PF (CR-PF) between Blumgart anastomosis and Kakita anastomosis in patients with a soft pancreas.

Methods

In total, 620 consecutive patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy at our institute from January 2010 to December 2016, and 282 patients with a soft pancreas were analyzed (Blumgart anastomosis, n = 110; Kakita anastomosis, n = 176). Short-term outcomes were assessed, and univariate and multivariate analyses of several clinicopathological variables were performed to analyze factors affecting the incidence of CR-PF.

Results

The CR-PF rate was 42.7% (122/286). The CR-PF rate was not significantly different between the Blumgart and Kakita groups (42.7% and 42.6%, respectively; p = 0.985). The morbidity rate (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) was 24.5% (70/286), and the operation-related mortality rate was 0.7% (2/286). In the multivariate analysis, male sex (p = 0.0245) and a body mass index of ≥22 kg/m² (p < 0.0001) were statistically significant risk factors for CR-PF.

Conclusions

The CR-PF rate was not significantly different between patients treated with Kakita versus Blumgart anastomosis.

Hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Appropriate postoperative readmission rates and modifiable risk factors for readmission have yet to be defined for many operations. This systematic review and meta-analysis attempt to define these parameters for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The main outcomes were readmission rate, risk factors, and reasons for readmission. Meta-analyses were performed when data was homogeneous, otherwise, a qualitative review was performed.

RESULTS

The 30-day, 90-day, and overall readmission rates were 17.63%, 26.14%, and 27.18%, respectively. In the meta-analysis, chronic pancreatitis (OR, 1.44, p = 0.04), operative length (MD, 26.1; p < 0.01), wound infection (OR, 1.9, p < 0.01), intra-abdominal abscess (OR, 3.79, p < 0.01), VTE (OR, 2.27, p = 0.01), and LOS (MD, 1.66, p < 0.01) where associated with readmission.

CONCLUSION

Hospital readmission will continue to be a quality metric and will influence reimbursement models. Thirty and 60-day readmission data underestimate the true readmission rate. Chronic pancreatitis, operative length, and several post-operative complications were associated with greater readmission. More uniform reporting is necessary to identify modifiable risk factors associated with readmission.

Surgeon Variation in Intraoperative Supply Cost for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is Intraoperative Supply Cost Associated with Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

With increased scrutiny on the quality and cost of health care, surgeons must be mindful of their outcomes and resource use. We evaluated surgeon-specific intraoperative supply cost (ISC) for pancreaticoduodenectomy and examined whether ISC was associated with patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2012 and March 2015 were included. Outcomes were tracked prospectively through postoperative day 90, and ISC was defined as the facility cost of single-use surgical items and instruments, plus facility charges for multiuse equipment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test associations between ISC and patient outcomes using repeated measures at the surgeon level.

RESULTS

There were 249 patients who met inclusion criteria. Median ISC was $1,882 (interquartile range [IQR] $1,497 to $2,281). Case volume for 6 surgeons ranged from 18 to 66. Median surgeon-specific ISC ranged from $1,496 to $2,371. Greater case volume was associated with decreased ISC (p < 0.001). Overall, ISC was not predictive of postoperative complications (p = 0.702) or total hospitalization expenditures (p = 0.195). At the surgeon level, surgeon-specific ISC was not associated with the surgeon-specific incidence of severe complication or any wound infection (p > 0.227 for both), but was associated with delayed gastric emptying (p = 0.004) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a single-institution cohort of 249 pancreaticoduodenectomies, high-volume surgeons tended to be low-cost surgeons. Across the cohort, ISC was not associated with outcomes. At the surgeon level, associations were noted between ISC and complications, but these may be attributable to unmeasured differences in the postoperative management of patients. These findings suggest that quality improvement efforts to restructure resource use toward more cost-effective practice may not affect patient outcomes, although prospective monitoring of safety and effectiveness must be of the utmost concern.

Metabolic syndrome and in-hospital outcomes among pancreatic cancer patients

AIMS

Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) is an important etiologic and prognostic factor for pancreatic cancer, but few studies have assessed health outcomes among hospitalized pancreatic cancer patients. We examined the associations between MetS and in-hospital outcomes, i.e. pancreatic resection, post-surgery complications, in-hospital mortality and discharge disposition among hospitalized patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset from 2007 to 2011, we obtained data on 47,386 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models were used to compute estimates, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

Pancreatic cancer patients with MetS were more likely to undergo pancreatic resection (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.04-1.25) compared to those without MetS. However they were less likely to experience post-surgical complications (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81-0.99), discharge to a skilled nursing facility (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93), and less likely to experience in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44-0.61) compared to those without MetS.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalized pancreatic cancer patients with a clinical diagnosis of MetS were more likely to receive pancreatic resection, and had reduced odds of post-surgical complications and in-hospital mortality. If confirmed in future studies, then better understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying this association will be needed, potentially leading to the development of clinical and/or molecular biomarkers to improve early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and identify patients that may benefit from pancreatic resection.

Nationwide prospective audit of pancreatic surgery: design, accuracy, and outcomes of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit

BACKGROUND

Auditing is an important tool to identify practice variation and 'best practices'. The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit is mandatory in all 18 Dutch centers for pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Performance indicators and case-mix factors were identified by a PubMed search for randomized controlled trials (RCT's) and large series in pancreatic surgery. In addition, data dictionaries of two national audits, three institutional databases, and the Dutch national cancer registry were evaluated. Morbidity, mortality, and length of stay were analyzed of all pancreatic resections registered during the first two audit years. Case ascertainment was cross-checked with the Dutch healthcare inspectorate and key-variables validated in all centers.

RESULTS

Sixteen RCT's and three large series were found. Sixteen indicators and 20 case-mix factors were included in the audit. During 2014-2015, 1785 pancreatic resections were registered including 1345 pancreatoduodenectomies. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.6%. Following pancreatoduodenectomy, mortality was 4.1%, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III morbidity was 29.9%, median (IQR) length of stay 12 (9-18) days, and readmission rate 16.0%. In total 97.2% of >40,000 variables validated were consistent with the medical charts.

CONCLUSIONS

The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, with high quality data, reports good outcomes of pancreatic surgery on a national level.

Surgeon Characteristics Supersede Hospital Characteristics in Mortality After Urgent Colectomy

BACKGROUND

Urgent colectomy is a common procedure with a high mortality rate that is performed by a variety of surgeons and hospitals. We investigated patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics that predicted mortality after urgent colectomy.

METHODS

The University HealthSystem Consortium was queried for adults undergoing urgent or emergent colectomy between 2009 and 2013 (n = 50,707). Hospitals were grouped into quartiles according to risk-adjusted observed-to-expected (O/E) mortality ratios and compared using the 2013 American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine patient and provider characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The overall mortality rate after urgent colectomy was 9 %. Mortality rates were higher for patients with extreme severity of illness (27.6 %), lowest socioeconomic status (10.6 %), weekend admissions (10.7 %), and open (10.5 %) and total (15.8 %) colectomies. Hospitals with the lowest O/E ratios were smaller and had lower volume and less teaching intensity, but there were no significant trends with regard to financial (expenses, payroll, capital expenditures per bed) or personnel characteristics (physicians, nurses, technicians per bed). On multivariate analysis, mortality was associated with patient age (10 years: OR 1.31, p < 0.01), severity of illness (extreme: OR 34.68, p < 0.01), insurance status (Medicaid: OR 1.24, p < 0.01; uninsured: OR 1.40, p < 0.01), and weekend admission (OR 1.09, p = 0.04). Surgeon volume was associated with reduced mortality (per 10 cases: OR 0.99, p < 0.01), but hospital volume was not (per case: OR 1.00, p = 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality is common after urgent colectomy and is associated with patient characteristics. Surgeon volume and practice patterns predicted differences in mortality, whereas hospital factors did not. These data suggest that policies focusing solely on hospital volume ignore other more important predictors of patient outcomes.

Case mix-adjusted cost of colectomy at low-, middle-, and high-volume academic centers

BACKGROUND

Efforts to regionalize surgery based on thresholds in procedure volume may have consequences on the cost of health care delivery. This study aims to delineate the relationship between hospital volume, case mix, and variability in the cost of operative intervention using colectomy as the model.

METHODS

All patients undergoing colectomy (n = 90,583) at 183 academic hospitals from 2009-2012 in The University HealthSystems Consortium Database were studied. Patient and procedure details were used to generate a case mix-adjusted predictive model of total direct costs. Observed to expected costs for each center were evaluated between centers based on overall procedure volume.

RESULTS

Patient and procedure characteristics were significantly different between volume tertiles. Observed costs at high-volume centers were less than at middle- and low-volume centers. According to our predictive model, high-volume centers cared for a less expensive case mix than middle- and low-volume centers ($12,786 vs $13,236 and $14,497, P < .01). Our predictive model accounted for 44% of the variation in costs. Overall efficiency (standardized observed to expected costs) was greatest at high-volume centers compared to middle- and low-volume tertiles (z score -0.16 vs 0.02 and -0.07, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Hospital costs and cost efficiency after an elective colectomy varies significantly between centers and may be attributed partially to the patient differences at those centers. These data demonstrate that a significant proportion of the cost variation is due to a distinct case mix at low-volume centers, which may lead to perceived poor performance at these centers.

Cost-Effectiveness in Hepatic Lobectomy: the Effect of Case Volume on Mortality, Readmission, and Cost of Care

OBJECTIVE(S)

Higher-volume centers demonstrate better perioperative outcomes for complex surgical interventions, though resource utilization implications of this hospital-level variation are unclear. We hypothesized that for hepatic lobectomy, higher operative volume correlates with better outcomes and lower costs.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2011, 4163 patients undergoing hepatic lobectomy were identified from the University HealthSystems Consortium database. Univariate, multivariate logistic regression, and decision analytic models were constructed to identify differences in hospital utilization and cost. Cost included both index and readmission hospitalizations, when applicable.

RESULTS

The annual number of hepatic lobectomies performed by the institutions within the study ranged from 1 to 86. The median age of the 4163 patients was 58 years with a roughly equal gender split (M/F 49 %:51 %) and a racial breakdown which reflected that of the general US population. For all patients, the overall perioperative mortality rate was 2.3 % and the 30-day readmission rate was 13.4 %. Hospitals performing >30 hepatic lobectomies per year had significantly lower mortality and readmission rates than those hospitals performing ≤15 lobectomies annually (both p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, higher severity of illness (odd ratio (OR) 2.13, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [1.48-3.07], p < 0.001), discharge to rehab (OR 1.84, [1.28-2.64], p < 0.001), home with home health care (OR 1.38, [1.08-1.76], p = 0.01), and surgery at a low-volume hospital (OR 1.49, [1.18-1.88], p < 0.001) were significant predictors of readmission. Conversely, surgical intervention at high-volume centers was associated with decreased risk of readmission (OR 0.67, [0.53-0.85], p < 0.001). When both index and readmission costs were considered, per-patient cost at low-volume centers was 21.9 % higher than at high-volume centers ($19,669 vs. $16,137). Sensitivity analyses adjusting for perioperative mortality and readmission at all centers did not significantly change the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These data, for the first time, demonstrate that hospital volume in hepatic lobectomy is an important, modifiable risk factor for readmission and cost. To optimize resource utilization, patients undergoing complex hepatic surgery should be directed to higher-volume surgical institutions.

Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy Does Not Improve Use or Time to Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The modifiable variable best proven to improve survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy. A theoretical advantage of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MI-PD) is the potential for greater use and earlier initiation of adjuvant therapy, but this benefit remains unproven.

METHODS

The 2010-2012 National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Subjects were classified as MI-PD versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (O-PD). Baseline variables were compared between groups. The independent effect of surgical approach on the use and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy was estimated using multivariable regression analyses.

RESULTS

For this study, 7967 subjects were identified: 1191 MI-PD (14.9%) and 6776 O-PD (85.1%) patients. Patients who underwent MI-PD were more likely to have been treated at academic hospitals. Otherwise, the groups had no baseline differences. In both the MI-PD and O-PD groups, approximately 50% of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, initiated at a median of 54 versus 55 days postoperatively (p = 0.08). After multivariable adjustment, surgical approach was not independently associated with use (odds ratio 1.00; p = 0.99) or time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (-2.3 days; p = 0.07). Younger age, insured status, lower comorbidity score, higher tumor stage, and the presence of lymph node metastases were independently associated with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

At a national level, MI-PD does not result in greater use or earlier initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. As surgeons and institutions continue to gain experience with this complex procedure, it will be important to revisit this benchmark as a justification for its increasing use for patients with pancreatic cancer.